YrhK is produced using an E. coli in vitro expression system, yielding soluble or membrane-bound forms depending on experimental conditions . Key parameters for its production include:
The use of E. coli as a host leverages its scalability, though B. subtilis itself is more commonly employed for secretory proteins due to its GRAS status and efficient secretion pathways .
While direct functional studies on YrhK are absent, its classification as a transmembrane protein aligns with roles observed in homologous B. subtilis systems:
Membrane Transport: Similar uncharacterized proteins in B. subtilis participate in antibiotic resistance or metabolite transport .
Stress Response: Membrane proteins often regulate osmotic stress or secretion systems, as seen in B. subtilis HtrA protease studies .
Current limitations in YrhK research include:
Functional Annotation: No knockout or overexpression studies to elucidate its biological role .
Optimization: E. coli-based expression may misfold transmembrane domains; switching to B. subtilis secretory systems could improve yield and stability .
Applications: Potential uses in industrial enzymology or synthetic biology remain unexplored .
B. subtilis is a preferred host for recombinant proteins due to:
While YrhK is currently produced in E. coli, transitioning to B. subtilis could align with industry trends favoring endotoxin-free systems .
KEGG: bsu:BSU27150
STRING: 224308.Bsubs1_010100014836
Recombinant Bacillus subtilis Uncharacterized protein yrhK (yrhK) is a small protein consisting of 96 amino acids that has not yet been functionally characterized in detail. The protein is identified in the UniProt database with ID O05401 and is also known as BSU27150. The full-length protein can be recombinantly expressed with an N-terminal His-tag in E. coli expression systems, allowing for purification and subsequent experimental analyses. The protein is derived from the Bacillus subtilis genome, a well-studied gram-positive bacterium frequently used as a model organism for genetic and molecular studies .
The amino acid sequence of the full-length yrhK protein (1-96 aa) is:
MKGNEEHDIQKELKRYELFFKKRYKVLYTVNDFIIGAMFLVGSFFFFYDRLMSAGIWLFAIGSLLLLIRPTIRLIHDFHYRKHVEQQFKHQSSTDD
Analysis of this sequence suggests that yrhK likely contains membrane-spanning domains based on the presence of hydrophobic amino acid stretches (e.g., FIIGAMFLVGS, WLFAIGSLLLLIR). The sequence also contains charged residues at both the N-terminal and C-terminal regions, which may be important for protein-protein interactions or localization within the bacterial cell .
Recombinant yrhK protein is typically supplied as a lyophilized powder and requires specific handling for optimal experimental use. The recommended storage protocol includes:
Store the lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
Aliquot the reconstituted protein to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week
Long-term storage requires 5-50% glycerol (optimally 50%) as a cryoprotectant
For reconstitution:
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect the contents at the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% for long-term storage
The storage buffer typically consists of Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0
The recombinant yrhK protein is typically expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag, which facilitates purification through affinity chromatography. The general purification procedure involves:
Expression of His-tagged yrhK in E. coli expression systems
Cell lysis under native or denaturing conditions depending on protein solubility
Affinity purification using nickel or cobalt resin that binds the His-tag
Washing steps to remove non-specifically bound proteins
Elution with imidazole buffer
Further purification may include size exclusion chromatography or ion exchange chromatography
The final product typically yields greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis, making it suitable for various biochemical and structural studies .
Studying uncharacterized proteins like yrhK requires a multi-faceted approach:
Computational prediction and structural analysis:
Sequence homology searches against characterized proteins
Secondary and tertiary structure prediction
Identification of conserved domains or motifs
Molecular modeling to predict potential binding partners
Expression analysis:
Quantitative PCR to determine expression patterns under different conditions
Promoter analysis to identify regulatory elements
RNA-seq to identify co-expressed genes in the same operon or regulon
Protein localization:
GFP fusion constructs to determine subcellular localization
Membrane fractionation studies, particularly relevant given yrhK's hydrophobic segments
Immunofluorescence microscopy with specific antibodies
Interaction studies:
Yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid screening
Co-immunoprecipitation with potential interacting partners
Crosslinking studies followed by mass spectrometry
Functional genomics:
To investigate yrhK's potential role under stress conditions, researchers should consider:
Stress-specific expression analysis:
Monitor yrhK expression levels under various stressors (osmotic, oxidative, pH, temperature)
Use qRT-PCR or luciferase reporter assays to quantify expression changes
Compare yrhK expression patterns with known stress-response genes
Knockout studies:
Create clean deletion mutants of yrhK using standard B. subtilis genetic tools
Construct complementation strains to confirm phenotypes
Perform growth curve analyses under various stress conditions
Analyze knockout strains for alterations in morphology, biofilm formation, or sporulation
Combinations with high-throughput approaches:
Perform RNA-seq on ΔyrhK strains vs. wild-type under stress conditions
Use proteomics to identify changes in protein abundance or post-translational modifications
Metabolomics analysis to identify altered metabolic pathways
Experimental evolution:
To investigate yrhK expression during sporulation, researchers can employ:
Temporal expression analysis:
Time-course sampling during sporulation induction
qRT-PCR targeting yrhK mRNA at various sporulation stages
Western blotting with anti-yrhK antibodies
Reporter gene fusions:
Sporulation-specific transcription factor dependency:
Analysis of yrhK expression in strains lacking sporulation sigma factors (σE, σF, σG, σK)
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) to test binding of sporulation regulators to yrhK promoter
ChIP-seq analysis to identify transcription factor binding in vivo
Comparative analysis with known sporulation genes:
The yrhK gene appears to be potentially related to a family of small genes that are under sporulation control in B. subtilis. Research approaches to investigate this relationship include:
Comparative genomic analysis:
Align sequences of known sporulation-controlled small genes with yrhK
Identify shared promoter elements or regulatory motifs
Perform phylogenetic analysis to determine evolutionary relationships
Regulatory network mapping:
Functional redundancy testing:
Generate single and multiple mutants lacking yrhK and related genes
Test sporulation efficiency in these mutants
Investigate whether deletion of multiple genes results in sporulation phenotypes similar to those described in search result , where deletion of six structurally similar genes actually improved sporulation efficiency
Structural analysis:
Based on the hydrophobic nature of yrhK's amino acid sequence, it likely has membrane association properties. To investigate this:
Membrane topology analysis:
Create fusion proteins with reporter tags at different positions
Use protease accessibility assays to determine which portions are exposed
Perform glycosylation mapping to identify lumenal regions
Use computational prediction tools (TMHMM, Phobius) to predict transmembrane segments
Subcellular fractionation:
Separate B. subtilis cellular components (cytoplasm, membrane, cell wall)
Use Western blotting to detect native yrhK in different fractions
Analyze detergent solubility to determine membrane microdomain association
Lipid interaction studies:
Perform liposome binding assays with purified yrhK
Analyze specific lipid preferences using lipid overlay assays
Use fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to study protein-lipid interactions
Structural studies:
To explore the potential functional relationships between yrhK and neighboring genes:
Operon analysis:
Perform RT-PCR across intergenic regions to determine if yrhK is co-transcribed with neighboring genes
Use Northern blotting to identify transcriptional units
Analyze terminator and promoter structures in the genomic region
Coordinated expression analysis:
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Perform bacterial two-hybrid or pull-down assays to test direct interactions
Use crosslinking mass spectrometry to identify proximal proteins
Investigate synthetic genetic interactions through double mutant analysis
Regulon mapping:
Advanced bioinformatic approaches to predict yrhK function include:
Deep homology detection:
Position-specific iterative BLAST (PSI-BLAST) to detect distant homologs
Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiles to identify related protein families
Structural homology modeling using tools like AlphaFold or RoseTTAFold
Genomic context analysis:
Examine conserved gene neighborhoods across bacterial species
Identify co-occurrence patterns with functionally characterized genes
Apply phylogenetic profiling to identify genes with similar evolutionary patterns
Network-based approaches:
Construct protein-protein interaction networks based on experimental data
Use guilt-by-association methods to infer function from network neighbors
Apply machine learning algorithms to predict function from multiple data types
Structural bioinformatics:
Predict binding pockets or active sites
Identify potential post-translational modification sites
Perform molecular docking simulations with potential ligands
Domain and motif analysis:
Researchers face several significant challenges when investigating uncharacterized proteins like yrhK:
Functional redundancy:
Multiple proteins may perform similar functions, masking phenotypes in single gene deletions
Requires generation of multiple deletion strains
Necessitates sophisticated phenotyping approaches to detect subtle effects
Condition-specific expression:
The protein may only be expressed under specific environmental conditions
Requires screening numerous conditions to identify when the protein is active
May need specialized equipment to mimic natural conditions
Technical limitations:
Small proteins like yrhK (96 aa) can be difficult to detect using standard proteomic approaches
Membrane proteins present challenges for purification and structural studies
Generating specific antibodies against small proteins can be problematic
Bioinformatic limitations:
Lack of characterized homologs limits computational predictions
Ab initio structure prediction remains challenging despite recent advances
Function prediction algorithms struggle with novel protein families
Integration of disparate data:
Research on yrhK could potentially advance our understanding of bacterial adaptation through:
Stress response mechanisms:
Membrane adaptations:
As a likely membrane protein, yrhK may participate in membrane remodeling during stress
Could reveal mechanisms for maintaining membrane integrity or fluidity
May identify novel lipid-protein interactions important for adaptation
Sporulation-related processes:
Horizontal gene transfer implications:
As B. subtilis can uptake DNA from the environment, studying yrhK in relation to competence and DNA uptake could reveal adaptation mechanisms
May provide insights into the integration of foreign DNA into cellular networks
Could help understand the evolutionary benefits and costs of horizontal gene transfer
When designing experiments to compare yrhK expression across different conditions, researchers should consider:
Experimental controls:
Include positive controls (genes known to respond to the tested conditions)
Include negative controls (housekeeping genes with stable expression)
Use appropriate normalization methods for qRT-PCR or RNA-seq data
Temporal dynamics:
Perform time-course experiments to capture transient expression changes
Consider both immediate responses and long-term adaptation
Account for growth phase-dependent expression patterns
Standardization of conditions:
Carefully control all environmental parameters
Use defined media rather than complex media when possible
Standardize inoculum density and growth phase
Technical considerations:
Use biological and technical replicates (minimum of 3)
Calculate statistical power to determine appropriate sample sizes
Consider using multiple measurement techniques (e.g., qRT-PCR and reporter fusions)
Data analysis approaches:
When analyzing yrhK expression data, researchers should consider these statistical approaches:
For qRT-PCR data:
Use the 2^(-ΔΔCT) method for relative quantification
Apply Student's t-test or ANOVA for comparing two or more conditions
Use non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis) if data doesn't follow normal distribution
Apply repeated measures ANOVA for time-course experiments
For RNA-seq data:
Use DESeq2 or edgeR for differential expression analysis
Apply GLM (Generalized Linear Models) for complex experimental designs
Implement multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure)
Consider time-series analysis methods for dynamic expression studies
For multi-omics integration:
Apply dimension reduction techniques (PCA, t-SNE)
Use network-based approaches to identify co-regulated genes
Implement machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition
Consider Bayesian approaches for integrating prior knowledge
For evolutionary analyses:
When faced with conflicting experimental results regarding yrhK function, researchers should:
Systematic analysis of experimental differences:
Compare exact experimental conditions (media, temperature, growth phase)
Evaluate strain backgrounds and potential secondary mutations
Assess methodological differences in protein expression or purification
Consider detection method sensitivity and specificity differences
Validation through independent approaches:
Use orthogonal experimental techniques to test the same hypothesis
Perform complementation experiments to confirm genetic manipulations
Validate key findings in different strain backgrounds
Consider collaboration with other labs to reproduce findings
Context-dependent function consideration:
Investigate if yrhK may have different functions under different conditions
Consider if post-translational modifications might alter function
Examine if protein partners or cofactors might vary between experiments
Assess if different cellular compartments were examined
Integration of seemingly contradictory results:
To distinguish direct from indirect effects when studying yrhK function:
Direct biochemical interaction studies:
Perform in vitro binding assays with purified components
Use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure interaction kinetics
Apply isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic analysis
Conduct crosslinking experiments followed by mass spectrometry
Immediate vs. delayed response analysis:
Use time-course experiments to identify rapid responses (likely direct)
Apply metabolic inhibitors to block protein synthesis and identify immediate effects
Implement pulse-chase experiments to track direct consequences
Use inducible systems to control the timing of yrhK expression
Genetic approach combinations:
Create point mutations in specific functional domains
Use suppressor screens to identify genetic interactions
Implement synthetic genetic arrays to map functional pathways
Apply CRISPR interference for rapid and tunable repression
Systems-level analysis:
Based on the current understanding of yrhK, several promising research directions emerge:
Structural characterization:
Determine the three-dimensional structure using NMR, X-ray crystallography, or cryo-EM
Map the membrane topology if it is indeed a membrane protein
Identify potential ligand binding sites or interaction domains
Functional genomics approaches:
Apply CRISPRi for tunable repression under various conditions
Use Tn-seq to identify genetic interactions
Implement ribosome profiling to precisely map translation
Apply chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify regulatory factors
Physiological context studies:
Investigate yrhK's role in natural environments rather than laboratory conditions
Study interactions with other soil microorganisms
Examine function during plant root colonization
Investigate potential roles in biofilm formation
Evolutionary perspectives:
Compare yrhK orthologs across Bacillus species
Investigate horizontal gene transfer patterns
Analyze selection pressures on different domains
Study the co-evolution with interacting partners
Integration into stress response networks:
To accelerate characterization of uncharacterized proteins through collaboration:
Interdisciplinary team formation:
Combine expertise in biochemistry, genetics, structural biology, and bioinformatics
Include computational biologists for prediction and data analysis
Engage statisticians for experimental design and data interpretation
Collaborate with mass spectrometry experts for proteomic analyses
Standardized protocols and data sharing:
Develop and share optimized protocols for protein expression and analysis
Create open-access databases for experimental results
Implement standardized metadata recording
Use electronic lab notebooks for improved reproducibility
High-throughput screening collaborations:
Distribute screening efforts across multiple labs
Share compound libraries and genetic resources
Develop centralized phenotypic analysis platforms
Implement machine learning for data integration
Collaborative funding approaches:
Apply for consortium grants focused on uncharacterized proteins
Develop shared resources through core facility funding
Implement distributed research networks
Engage industry partners for technology development
Community annotation and curation:
Emerging technologies likely to advance understanding of uncharacterized proteins include:
Advanced structural biology methods:
AlphaFold and related AI-based structure prediction tools
Cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural analysis
Microcrystal electron diffraction for small proteins
Time-resolved structural methods to capture dynamic states
Single-cell and single-molecule techniques:
Single-cell RNA-seq to capture cell-to-cell variation
Super-resolution microscopy for protein localization
Single-molecule tracking to follow protein dynamics
Nanopore sequencing for direct RNA modification detection
CRISPR-based technologies:
Base editors for precise genetic modifications
CRISPRi/CRISPRa for tunable gene regulation
CRISPR screening with single-cell readouts
Perturb-seq for combining genetic perturbation with transcriptome analysis
Proteomics advances:
Thermal proteome profiling to identify ligand interactions
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics
Crosslinking mass spectrometry for interaction mapping
Top-down proteomics for intact protein analysis
Computational and AI approaches: