Recombinant Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian 6-phosphofructokinase (pfkA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this during order placement.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery timelines. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize its inclusion.
Synonyms
pfkA; BT9727_4328; ATP-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase; ATP-PFK; Phosphofructokinase; EC 2.7.1.11; Phosphohexokinase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-319
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian (strain 97-27)
Target Names
pfkA
Target Protein Sequence
MKRIGVLTSG GDSPGMNAAI RAVVRKAIFH DIEVYGIYHG YAGLISGHIE KLELGSVGDI IHRGGTKLYT ARCPEFKDPE VRLKGIEQLK KHGIEGLVVI GGDGSYQGAK KLTEQGFPCV GVPGTIDNDI PGTDFTIGFD TALNTVIDAI DKIRDTATSH ERTYVIEVMG RHAGDIALWA GLADGAETIL IPEEEYDMED VIARLKRGSE RGKKHSIIVV AEGVGSAIDI GKHIEEATNF DTRVTVLGHV QRGGSPSAQD RVLASRLGAR AVELLIAGKG GRCVGIQDNK LVDHDIIEAL AQKHTIDKDM YQLSKELSI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein catalyzes the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of D-fructose 6-phosphate to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, representing the first committed step in glycolysis.

Database Links
Protein Families
Phosphofructokinase type A (PFKA) family, ATP-dependent PFK group I subfamily, Prokaryotic clade "B1" sub-subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is 6-Phosphofructokinase (pfkA) and what is its role in Bacillus thuringiensis metabolism?

6-Phosphofructokinase (pfkA) is a key regulatory enzyme in the glycolytic pathway that catalyzes the phosphorylation of fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate using ATP as a phosphate donor. In Bacillus thuringiensis, including the konkukian subspecies, pfkA plays a crucial role in central carbon metabolism by controlling the flux through glycolysis based on cellular energy needs and carbon availability . The enzyme typically consists of 319 amino acids in Bacillus species, as evidenced by recombinant protein sequences available from commercial sources .

As a regulatory enzyme, pfkA functions at a critical branch point in metabolism, directing carbon flux between energy production pathways and biosynthetic processes. The enzyme's activity is tightly regulated through allosteric mechanisms that respond to the energy state of the cell, making it a central metabolic control point. In B. thuringiensis, proper functioning of pfkA is essential for growth, sporulation, and toxin production, which are defining characteristics of this bacterial species.

How does recombinant pfkA expression differ between various host systems?

Recombinant Bacillus pfkA proteins, including those from B. thuringiensis subspecies, can be expressed in various heterologous systems, each offering distinct advantages and challenges. The most common expression systems include:

E. coli expression systems (bactosomes) are frequently employed for high-yield production of recombinant pfkA . These systems typically incorporate affinity tags such as His-tags to facilitate purification . E. coli-based expression benefits from rapid growth, high protein yields, and well-established protocols, but may sometimes struggle with proper folding of complex bacterial proteins.

Yeast expression systems represent an alternative approach that may be preferred when post-translational modifications are important or when E. coli-expressed proteins show poor solubility . Commercial recombinant pfkA proteins from Bacillus species are available with His-tags and demonstrate high purity (>90%) when expressed in yeast systems .

The choice of expression system significantly impacts protein yield, activity, and downstream applications. For structural and functional studies requiring high protein purity, researchers should consider:

  • Codon optimization for the chosen expression host

  • Selection of appropriate promoters and regulatory elements

  • Fusion tags that enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO, GST)

  • Expression conditions (temperature, induction time, media composition)

  • Cell lysis and protein extraction methods compatible with maintaining enzyme activity

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining recombinant pfkA activity?

Maintaining enzymatic activity during storage is critical for reliable experimental results when working with recombinant pfkA. Purified recombinant pfkA proteins are typically stored at -80°C for long-term storage or at -20°C for shorter periods. The storage buffer usually contains glycerol (20-50%) as a cryoprotectant to prevent freeze-thaw damage.

For optimal stability, the storage buffer should maintain a pH of 7.5-8.0 and include components such as:

  • Tris-HCl or phosphate buffer (20-50 mM)

  • NaCl (100-150 mM) to maintain ionic strength

  • DTT or β-mercaptoethanol (1-5 mM) to prevent oxidation of cysteine residues

  • Optional: protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and activity loss. If frequent use is anticipated, aliquoting the protein before freezing is recommended. For working solutions, temporary storage at 4°C is acceptable for 1-2 days, but activity should be monitored if stored for longer periods. Commercial preparations of recombinant pfkA with His-tags have demonstrated good stability under proper storage conditions .

How should researchers design an experimental approach to study pfkA enzyme kinetics?

Designing robust enzyme kinetic studies for pfkA requires careful consideration of experimental variables and controls. A systematic approach should include:

  • Variable identification:

    • Independent variable: Substrate (fructose-6-phosphate) concentration

    • Dependent variable: Reaction rate (velocity)

    • Controlled variables: Temperature, pH, ATP concentration, enzyme concentration

    • Potential confounding variables: Product inhibition, substrate degradation

  • Hypothesis formulation:

    • Clear, testable hypothesis about kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax) or regulatory effects

    • Prediction of expected outcomes based on existing literature

  • Reaction conditions optimization:

    • Buffer composition: Typically Tris-HCl or HEPES (pH 7.5-8.0)

    • Cofactor requirements: Mg2+ (usually 5-10 mM)

    • Temperature: 25-37°C depending on the specific research question

    • Enzyme concentration: Should be in the linear range of activity response

  • Measurement approach:

    • Direct assays: Spectrophotometric monitoring of NAD(P)H oxidation through coupled enzyme reactions

    • Indirect assays: Quantification of reaction products via HPLC or mass spectrometry

    • Time course measurements to ensure initial velocity conditions

  • Data analysis plan:

    • Michaelis-Menten plots for determining Km and Vmax

    • Lineweaver-Burk or other transformations for evaluating inhibition mechanisms

    • Statistical analysis to ensure significance of results

This experimental design framework enables the systematic investigation of pfkA kinetics and allows for valid comparisons between different enzyme sources or experimental conditions.

What methods are available for measuring recombinant pfkA activity in vitro?

Several established methods can be employed to measure the activity of recombinant pfkA in vitro, each with specific advantages and limitations:

  • Coupled enzyme assay (spectrophotometric): This widely used method couples the pfkA reaction to auxiliary enzymes whose activity results in oxidation or reduction of NAD(P)H, which can be monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. The assay typically includes:

    • Auxiliary enzymes: aldolase, triosephosphate isomerase, and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

    • Detection of NADH oxidation as fructose-1,6-bisphosphate is converted to glycerol-3-phosphate

    • Advantages: Real-time monitoring, high sensitivity

    • Limitations: Potential interference from auxiliary enzymes

  • Direct product quantification:

    • HPLC-based methods to directly quantify fructose-1,6-bisphosphate formation

    • LC-MS/MS approaches for highly sensitive and specific product detection

    • Advantages: Direct measurement without interference from coupled enzymes

    • Limitations: Generally endpoint assays rather than continuous monitoring

  • Radiometric assays:

    • Using [γ-32P]ATP to monitor transfer of radioactive phosphate to substrate

    • Advantages: High sensitivity, direct measurement of phosphoryl transfer

    • Limitations: Requires radioisotope handling facilities, safety considerations

  • Bioluminescent ADP detection:

    • Monitoring ADP production (byproduct of the pfkA reaction) using luciferase-based detection systems

    • Advantages: High sensitivity, compatible with high-throughput screening

    • Limitations: Potential interference from contaminants affecting luminescence

Each method requires careful validation, including establishing linear range of enzyme concentration and confirming reaction conditions are optimized for the recombinant enzyme. Researchers should select the approach that best aligns with their specific experimental questions and available equipment.

How can researchers evaluate the impact of allosteric regulators on recombinant pfkA activity?

Evaluating allosteric regulation of recombinant pfkA requires a systematic approach to detect and characterize the effects of potential regulators on enzyme activity. A comprehensive methodology includes:

  • Screening for potential regulators:

    • Test metabolites known to regulate glycolysis (e.g., AMP, ADP, PEP, citrate)

    • Evaluate bacterial-specific regulators like fructose-2,6-bisphosphate

    • Include species-specific compounds reported in literature

  • Kinetic characterization approaches:

    • Velocity vs. substrate concentration curves in the presence and absence of regulators

    • Generate a range of regulator concentrations to establish dose-response relationships

    • Determine changes in kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax) to identify the type of regulation

  • Analyzing allosteric effects:

    • Hill plots to quantify cooperativity (n < 1: negative cooperativity; n > 1: positive cooperativity)

    • Dixon plots to distinguish between competitive, noncompetitive, and uncompetitive inhibition

    • Global fitting of data to allosteric models (e.g., Monod-Wyman-Changeux or Koshland-Némethy-Filmer)

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Include buffer-only controls for each regulator concentration

    • Account for potential regulator effects on auxiliary enzymes if using coupled assays

    • Test combinations of regulators to identify synergistic or antagonistic effects

    • Consider the physiological relevance of regulator concentrations

  • Data interpretation guidelines:

    • Compare EC50 values for activators or IC50 values for inhibitors

    • Evaluate changes in sigmoidal character of substrate-velocity curves

    • Consider the fit of different allosteric models to the experimental data

    • Relate findings to the physiological role of pfkA in B. thuringiensis metabolism

This methodological framework enables researchers to systematically characterize the allosteric regulation of recombinant pfkA and make valid comparisons with native enzyme behavior.

How can researchers use site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the structure-function relationship of pfkA?

Site-directed mutagenesis is a powerful approach for investigating structure-function relationships in pfkA from Bacillus thuringiensis. A systematic experimental approach includes:

  • Target selection for mutagenesis:

    • Catalytic residues predicted from sequence alignments with well-characterized pfkA enzymes

    • Regulatory sites involved in allosteric regulation

    • Residues at subunit interfaces important for oligomerization

    • Species-specific residues that differ from other Bacillus pfkA enzymes

  • Mutagenesis strategy:

    • Conservative mutations: Substitution with amino acids of similar properties to probe subtle effects

    • Non-conservative mutations: Dramatic changes to establish essential functional roles

    • Alanine-scanning mutagenesis: Systematic replacement with alanine to identify critical residues

    • Domain swapping: Replacing entire segments with corresponding regions from other species

  • Expression and purification considerations:

    • Use the same expression system for wild-type and mutant proteins

    • Implement identical purification protocols to ensure valid comparisons

    • Verify protein folding using circular dichroism spectroscopy or thermal stability assays

    • Confirm oligomerization state using size-exclusion chromatography or native PAGE

  • Functional characterization of mutants:

    • Steady-state kinetics (Km, kcat, kcat/Km) to assess catalytic efficiency

    • Substrate specificity profiles to identify changes in recognition

    • Response to allosteric regulators to map regulatory sites

    • Temperature and pH stability to detect structural perturbations

  • Structural validation:

    • When possible, complement biochemical data with structural studies (X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM)

    • Use molecular dynamics simulations to predict effects of mutations

    • Apply hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to probe conformational changes

This methodological framework enables systematic investigation of pfkA structure-function relationships and the identification of residues critical for catalysis, regulation, and species-specific properties.

What approaches can be used to study the oligomeric structure of recombinant pfkA?

Understanding the oligomeric structure of recombinant pfkA is crucial, as the protein typically functions as a homotetramer or higher-order oligomer. Multiple complementary techniques can be employed to characterize oligomerization:

  • Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC):

    • Separates proteins based on hydrodynamic radius

    • Can distinguish between monomeric, dimeric, tetrameric, and higher-order states

    • Multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) provides absolute molecular weight determination

    • Limitations: Lower resolution for very large complexes, potential dilution effects

  • Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC):

    • Sedimentation velocity experiments to determine size distribution

    • Sedimentation equilibrium to determine molecular weight and association constants

    • Advantages: Solution-based technique without matrix interactions

    • Can detect multiple oligomeric species in equilibrium

  • Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis:

    • Preserves non-covalent protein interactions

    • Blue native PAGE (BN-PAGE) uses Coomassie dye instead of SDS

    • Clear native PAGE (CN-PAGE) for proteins that bind Coomassie poorly

    • Advantages: Simple technique, minimal equipment requirements

  • Chemical crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry:

    • Bifunctional reagents (e.g., glutaraldehyde, BS3) to covalently link proximal subunits

    • Analysis by SDS-PAGE to visualize crosslinked species

    • Mass spectrometry to identify crosslinked peptides and infer spatial relationships

    • Advantages: Can "freeze" transient interactions, works at low concentrations

  • Biophysical techniques for higher-resolution analysis:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) to monitor secondary structure changes upon oligomerization

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine thermodynamic parameters of association

    • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for low-resolution structural models

    • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for high-resolution structures of oligomers

These complementary approaches provide a comprehensive characterization of pfkA oligomeric structure and allow researchers to link structural features to functional properties.

What are the challenges and solutions for expressing and purifying recombinant pfkA with optimal activity?

Expressing and purifying recombinant pfkA with high activity presents several challenges that require strategic solutions:

  • Expression system selection:

    • Challenge: Maintaining proper folding and oligomerization in heterologous systems

    • Solutions:

      • E. coli-based expression (bactosomes) for high yield but may require optimization

      • Expression in Bacillus subtilis for more native-like processing

      • Co-expression with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J) to assist folding

      • Expression as fusion proteins (MBP, SUMO) to enhance solubility

  • Solubility and inclusion body prevention:

    • Challenge: Recombinant pfkA can form inclusion bodies in high-expression systems

    • Solutions:

      • Optimize induction conditions (lower temperature, reduced inducer concentration)

      • Use lysis buffers containing mild solubilizing agents (low concentrations of urea or detergents)

      • Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, trehalose) to extraction buffers

      • Consider native purification from inclusion bodies if refolding protocols are established

  • Purification strategy optimization:

    • Challenge: Maintaining enzymatic activity throughout purification

    • Solutions:

      • Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged constructs

      • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

      • Add reducing agents (DTT, TCEP) to prevent oxidation

      • Maintain physiological pH and ionic strength throughout purification

      • Minimize purification steps to reduce activity loss

  • Activity preservation:

    • Challenge: Activity loss during storage and handling

    • Solutions:

      • Add stabilizers (glycerol 20-50%, BSA) to storage buffers

      • Aliquot and flash-freeze to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

      • Include cofactors (Mg2+) and reducing agents in storage buffers

      • Optimize buffer composition based on thermal stability assays

By addressing these challenges with appropriate solutions, researchers can obtain highly active recombinant pfkA suitable for diverse experimental applications, from basic kinetic studies to structural investigations.

How should researchers analyze and interpret enzyme kinetic data for recombinant pfkA?

  • Initial velocity analysis:

    • Plot reaction velocity vs. substrate concentration

    • Fit data to appropriate mathematical models:

      • Michaelis-Menten equation for hyperbolic kinetics

      • Hill equation for sigmoidal kinetics indicating cooperativity

    • Use nonlinear regression rather than linearization methods (e.g., Lineweaver-Burk)

    • Report standard errors for all derived parameters

  • Kinetic parameter determination:

    • Calculate Km (substrate concentration at half-maximal velocity)

    • Determine Vmax and convert to kcat using enzyme concentration

    • Calculate catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) as a measure of enzyme perfection

    • For allosteric enzymes, report Hill coefficients and K0.5 instead of Km

  • Inhibition studies analysis:

    • Generate double-reciprocal plots (1/v vs. 1/[S]) at different inhibitor concentrations

    • Use pattern of line intersections to distinguish inhibition types:

      • Competitive: Lines intersect on y-axis

      • Noncompetitive: Lines intersect on x-axis

      • Uncompetitive: Parallel lines

      • Mixed: Lines intersect in quadrant II

    • Calculate inhibition constants (Ki) using appropriate equations for each inhibition type

  • Statistical validation:

    • Report goodness-of-fit parameters (R2, residual plots)

    • Perform replicate experiments to establish reproducibility

    • Use F-test to compare fits to different models

    • Calculate confidence intervals for all parameters

  • Interpretation guidelines:

    • Compare parameters with published values for related enzymes

    • Relate kinetic behavior to physiological context in B. thuringiensis

    • Consider substrate concentrations in vivo when interpreting Km values

    • Evaluate the physiological relevance of observed regulatory effects

This systematic analytical framework ensures rigorous interpretation of kinetic data and facilitates comparison with enzymes from different sources or under different experimental conditions.

How can researchers effectively troubleshoot recombinant pfkA activity assays when results are inconsistent?

Troubleshooting inconsistent results in pfkA activity assays requires a systematic approach to identify and address potential sources of variation:

  • Enzyme quality assessment:

    • Problem: Loss of activity during storage or handling

    • Diagnostic tests:

      • SDS-PAGE to check for degradation

      • Size-exclusion chromatography to verify oligomeric state

      • Thermal shift assay to assess protein stability

    • Solutions:

      • Prepare fresh enzyme dilutions from frozen stocks

      • Add stabilizers (glycerol, BSA) to dilution buffers

      • Verify concentration using reliable protein quantification methods

  • Assay component validation:

    • Problem: Variable quality of substrates or coupling enzymes

    • Diagnostic tests:

      • Use control enzymes with established activity

      • Systematically replace individual assay components

      • Check substrate purity by analytical methods

    • Solutions:

      • Prepare fresh substrate solutions

      • Use commercial coupling enzyme mixtures with verified activity

      • Verify cofactor quality (ATP, Mg2+)

  • Instrument and measurement issues:

    • Problem: Spectrophotometer variability or detection limitations

    • Diagnostic tests:

      • Calibrate instrument with standard solutions

      • Compare results across different instruments

      • Test linearity with standard reaction rates

    • Solutions:

      • Establish instrument-specific baseline corrections

      • Adjust enzyme concentration to optimal detection range

      • Consider alternative detection methods if necessary

  • Reaction conditions inconsistency:

    • Problem: Temperature, pH, or buffer composition variations

    • Diagnostic tests:

      • Monitor temperature during assays

      • Verify buffer pH before and after reaction

      • Test sensitivity to minor variations in reaction conditions

    • Solutions:

      • Use temperature-controlled cuvette holders or plate readers

      • Prepare larger volumes of reaction buffer for consistency

      • Standardize reagent addition order and timing

  • Data analysis issues:

    • Problem: Inconsistent calculation methods or data processing

    • Diagnostic tests:

      • Reanalyze raw data using different methods

      • Verify calculation formulas and conversion factors

      • Check for outliers and their impact on results

    • Solutions:

      • Implement standardized data analysis workflows

      • Use enzyme kinetics software for consistent analysis

      • Establish clear criteria for data inclusion/exclusion

By systematically addressing these potential issues, researchers can improve the reproducibility and reliability of pfkA activity measurements, enabling confident interpretation of experimental results.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.