Recombinant Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian ATP synthase subunit delta (atpH) is a genetically engineered protein derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian. This subunit is part of the ATP synthase complex, which plays a crucial role in energy production by synthesizing ATP from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. The ATP synthase complex is composed of two main domains: the extramembranous catalytic F1 domain and the membrane-embedded proton channel F0 domain, connected by central and peripheral stalks. The delta subunit is a component of the stalk, linking the F0 and F1 domains and facilitating the transmission of conformational changes or participating in proton conduction.
The ATP synthase subunit delta (atpH) in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian is a protein with a specific amino acid sequence that contributes to the structural integrity and functional efficiency of the ATP synthase complex. The sequence of this protein is crucial for its role in energy metabolism within the bacterium.
Sequence Information:
The target protein sequence for the recombinant ATP synthase subunit delta is: MSNGIVAKRY AVALFKIAKE KHVLEMFEEE LRLVQNVYEK NGELHSFLTQ PNISKEQKKT FLANVFGSVS ESILNTLYIL IDNKRIDILS DIANEYVVLA NEERNVADAT VYSTRLLSEE EKLNIAEAFA KRTGKDAIRV KNVVDEDLLG GIKVRIGNRI YDGSLQGKLA RIQRELMKNR.
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Protein Sequence | MSNGIVAKRY AVALFKIAKE KHVLEMFEEE LRLVQNVYEK NGELHSFLTQ PNISKEQKKT FLANVFGSVS ESILNTLYIL IDNKRIDILS DIANEYVVLA NEERNVADAT VYSTRLLSEE EKLNIAEAFA KRTGKDAIRV KNVVDEDLLG GIKVRIGNRI YDGSLQGKLA RIQRELMKNR |
| Function | Part of the ATP synthase complex, involved in ATP synthesis from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. |
| UniProt No. | Q6HAX6 |
KEGG: btk:BT9727_4991
The ATP synthase subunit delta (atpH) in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian is a protein that functions as a component of the stalk connecting the F₀ and F₁ domains of the ATP synthase complex. According to structural modeling data, the protein consists of 180 amino acids with the following sequence: MSNGIVAKRY AVALFKIAKE KHVLEMFEEE LRLVQNVYEK NGELHSFLTQ PNISKEQKKT FLANVFGSVS ESILNTLYIL IDNKRIDILS DIANEYVVLA NEERNVADAT VYSTRLLSEE EKLNIAEAFA KRTGKDAIRV KNVVDEDLLG GIKVRIGNRI YDGSLQGKLA RIQRELMKNR.
The computed structure model of this protein (available as AF_AFQ6HAX6F1 in the RCSB Protein Data Bank) has been generated using AlphaFold, with a global pLDDT (predicted Local Distance Difference Test) score of 84.29, indicating a relatively confident prediction of the protein's tertiary structure . The model was released in the AlphaFold database on December 9, 2021, and last modified on September 30, 2022 .
ATP synthase subunit delta serves as a critical component of the ATP synthase complex, which synthesizes ATP from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. The delta subunit specifically contributes to the structural integrity of the complex by linking the membrane-embedded F₀ domain with the catalytic F₁ domain. This linkage facilitates the transmission of conformational changes between the domains and may participate in the proton conduction process.
In bacterial energy metabolism, this subunit helps maintain the proper assembly and function of the entire ATP synthase complex, which is essential for cellular energy production. Disruption of the delta subunit function could potentially impair ATP synthesis and subsequently affect numerous cellular processes dependent on ATP availability.
For the recombinant expression of B. thuringiensis subsp. konkukian ATP synthase subunit delta, several expression systems can be employed based on research needs:
E. coli-based expression systems:
BL21(DE3) strains are commonly used for expressing bacterial proteins due to their reduced protease activity
pET vector systems under the control of T7 promoter provide high-yield expression
Fusion tags such as His6, GST, or MBP can facilitate purification and potentially enhance solubility
Methodology for optimization:
Clone the atpH gene (UniProt: Q6HAX6) into an expression vector with an appropriate fusion tag
Transform into competent E. coli cells
Screen multiple expression conditions varying:
Induction temperature (15-37°C)
IPTG concentration (0.1-1.0 mM)
Induction time (3-24 hours)
Analyze expression levels using SDS-PAGE and western blotting
When working with ATP synthase components, researchers should consider that these proteins typically function as part of a complex, and isolated subunits may exhibit different folding characteristics compared to their native environment.
A multi-step purification strategy is recommended for obtaining high-purity recombinant ATP synthase subunit delta:
Initial capture:
For His-tagged constructs: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA or Co-NTA resin
For GST-fusion proteins: Glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography
Intermediate purification:
Ion exchange chromatography (considering the theoretical pI of the protein)
Tag cleavage using TEV or thrombin protease (if tag removal is desired)
Polishing step:
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and achieve high homogeneity
Buffer optimization considerations:
pH range: 7.0-8.0 to maintain protein stability
Salt concentration: 150-300 mM NaCl to prevent non-specific interactions
Addition of glycerol (5-10%) to enhance protein stability
Potential inclusion of reducing agents like DTT or β-mercaptoethanol (1-5 mM)
The purification protocol should be validated using SDS-PAGE, western blotting, and mass spectrometry to confirm identity and purity.
When evaluating computational model reliability, researchers should consider:
For ATP synthase subunit delta, researchers should note that computational models currently lack experimental validation, as indicated in the model metadata: "There are no experimental data to verify the accuracy of this computed structure model" . Therefore, while useful for generating hypotheses and designing experiments, these models should be interpreted cautiously until experimentally validated.
Several experimental approaches can be employed to validate or refine the computational structure prediction of ATP synthase subunit delta:
X-ray crystallography:
Provides high-resolution structural information
Requires obtaining protein crystals, which can be challenging for membrane-associated proteins
Method:
Express and purify protein to >95% homogeneity
Screen numerous crystallization conditions
Optimize crystal growth for diffraction quality
Collect and process diffraction data
Solve structure using molecular replacement with the computational model as a starting point
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:
Useful for smaller proteins or domains (<25 kDa)
Provides information about protein dynamics in solution
Method:
Express isotopically labeled protein (¹⁵N, ¹³C)
Collect multi-dimensional NMR spectra
Assign resonances and calculate distance constraints
Generate and refine structural models
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Increasingly powerful for resolving protein structures
Particularly valuable for large complexes like complete ATP synthase
Method:
Prepare protein sample in vitrified ice
Collect micrographs under cryogenic conditions
Process images to generate 3D reconstructions
Fit atomic models into EM density maps
Integrative structural biology approaches:
Combine multiple experimental techniques with computational models
Particularly useful for challenging systems like membrane-associated proteins
Example workflow:
Use computational models for initial hypothesis generation
Validate secondary structure elements with circular dichroism
Probe specific regions with hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry
Identify domain interactions with crosslinking mass spectrometry
Integrate all data to refine the structural model
Investigating interactions between ATP synthase subunit delta and other components of the ATP synthase complex requires specialized techniques:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Useful for identifying stable protein-protein interactions
Method:
Generate antibodies against ATP synthase subunit delta or use tagged recombinant protein
Prepare bacterial cell lysate under non-denaturing conditions
Immunoprecipitate subunit delta with specific antibodies
Analyze co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Provides quantitative binding kinetics data
Method:
Immobilize purified ATP synthase subunit delta on a sensor chip
Flow potential interacting partners over the surface
Measure association and dissociation rates
Calculate binding affinity constants
Crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry:
Captures transient or weak interactions
Provides spatial constraints for structural modeling
Method:
Treat purified ATP synthase complex with crosslinking reagents
Digest crosslinked samples with proteases
Enrich crosslinked peptides
Identify crosslinks by mass spectrometry
Map interaction interfaces based on crosslinked residues
Bacterial two-hybrid assays:
In vivo system for detecting protein interactions
Method:
Clone ATP synthase subunit delta and potential interactors into appropriate vectors
Co-transform into reporter bacterial strain
Measure reporter gene activation as indicator of interaction
Validate with controls and competition assays
For studying the specific role of subunit delta in ATP synthase assembly, researchers can also employ mutagenesis approaches followed by functional assays to identify critical residues involved in complex formation and activity.
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Allows systematic analysis of key residues
Method:
Identify conserved or structurally important residues based on sequence alignments and structural models
Generate point mutations using PCR-based methods
Express and purify mutant proteins
Assess effects on ATP synthase assembly and activity
Compare kinetic parameters of wild-type vs. mutant complexes
Reconstitution experiments:
Enables assessment of subunit delta's role in complex assembly
Method:
Purify individual ATP synthase components
Assemble complexes with and without subunit delta
Measure ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activities
Analyze complex stability using native gel electrophoresis or analytical ultracentrifugation
ATP synthesis/hydrolysis assays:
Quantifies functional impact of subunit delta modifications
Method for ATP synthesis:
Reconstitute ATP synthase into liposomes
Generate proton gradient (pH or electrical potential)
Add ADP and Pi
Measure ATP production using luciferase assay
Method for ATP hydrolysis:
Incubate purified ATP synthase with ATP
Measure inorganic phosphate release colorimetrically
Calculate enzymatic parameters (Km, Vmax)
Proton translocation measurements:
Assesses coupling between proton movement and ATP synthesis
Method:
Reconstitute ATP synthase into proteoliposomes
Include pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
Initiate ATP hydrolysis and monitor pH changes
Compare efficiency with and without functional subunit delta
ATP synthase subunit delta shows varying degrees of conservation across bacterial species, which can provide insights into functional constraints and evolutionary relationships:
Sequence conservation analysis:
B. thuringiensis subsp. konkukian ATP synthase subunit delta (UniProt: Q6HAX6) can be compared with homologs from other species
Multiple sequence alignment reveals:
Highly conserved regions likely involved in critical functions
Variable regions potentially associated with species-specific adaptations
Conservation patterns related to structural elements (e.g., helices, loops)
Phylogenetic distribution:
ATP synthase subunit delta is widely distributed across bacterial phyla
Sequence similarity tends to correlate with taxonomic relationships
Within the Bacillus genus, higher sequence identity percentages (typically >70%) are observed
Structural conservation:
Functional motifs:
Key interaction surfaces for binding to other ATP synthase components show higher conservation
Regions involved in conformational changes during catalysis are typically more conserved than peripheral regions
For researchers interested in evolutionary analyses, focusing on patterns of conservation can provide valuable insights into structure-function relationships and guide experimental designs for mutational studies.
Comparing ATP synthase components across bacterial species reveals important structural and functional adaptations:
Structural variations:
Functional adaptations:
ATP synthases from extremophiles show adaptations to their environmental conditions:
Interaction interfaces:
The mode of interaction between subunit delta and other components may differ between species
These differences can affect the efficiency of energy coupling and ATP synthesis
Comparative analysis can reveal species-specific interaction networks
Regulatory mechanisms:
Different bacterial species may employ varied regulatory mechanisms for ATP synthase
Post-translational modifications may differ between species
Allosteric regulation sites can vary in location and sensitivity
Evolutionary implications:
Different selection pressures have shaped ATP synthase components
Horizontal gene transfer events may have contributed to diversity in some lineages
Co-evolution patterns between interacting subunits can provide insights into functional coupling
For researchers studying B. thuringiensis ATP synthase subunit delta, understanding these differences is crucial for interpreting experimental results and designing functional studies that account for species-specific characteristics.
ATP synthase represents a potential target for antimicrobial development, and understanding subunit delta could contribute to this research area:
Rationale for targeting ATP synthase:
Essential for bacterial energy metabolism
Structural differences exist between bacterial and human ATP synthases
Inhibition would broadly impact bacterial cellular functions
Strategies for targeting subunit delta:
Structure-based drug design:
Use computational models to identify potential binding pockets
Perform virtual screening of compound libraries
Test high-scoring candidates for inhibitory activity
Optimize lead compounds based on structure-activity relationships
Peptide-based inhibitors:
Design peptides that mimic interaction interfaces of subunit delta
Test their ability to disrupt complex assembly
Optimize peptide stability and cell penetration
Evaluate antimicrobial efficacy in vitro and in vivo
Antibody-based approaches:
Generate antibodies against accessible epitopes of subunit delta
Test for inhibition of ATP synthase function
Evaluate potential for immunotherapy applications
Experimental evaluation methods:
ATP synthesis inhibition assays using reconstituted systems
Growth inhibition assays with potential inhibitors
Membrane potential measurements to assess impact on proton motive force
Kill kinetics determination for promising compounds
Considerations for antimicrobial development:
Selectivity for bacterial over mammalian ATP synthase
Penetration of bacterial cell envelope
Potential for resistance development
Spectrum of activity across bacterial species
Research focusing on B. thuringiensis ATP synthase may have broader implications for developing antimicrobials against related pathogenic species within the Bacillus cereus group.
ATP synthase function is likely crucial for B. thuringiensis adaptation to various environmental conditions, with potential research implications:
Energy metabolism adaptation:
B. thuringiensis undergoes significant metabolic changes during different growth phases
ATP synthase regulation may be integrated with sporulation and toxin production pathways
Adaptation to fluctuating nutrient availability may involve modulation of ATP synthase activity
Stress response mechanisms:
Under environmental stresses (pH, temperature, nutrient limitation), energy metabolism must be optimized
ATP synthase function may be regulated to balance energy production with cellular needs
Potential research approaches:
Monitor ATP synthase gene expression under various stress conditions
Assess post-translational modifications in response to stress
Measure ATP synthesis capacity during adaptation to different environments
Compare ATP synthase activity between vegetative cells and spores
Relationship to virulence factors:
B. thuringiensis is known for producing delta-endotoxins (Cry proteins)
Energy demands for toxin production may require coordinated regulation of ATP synthase
Research has shown that medium components like FeSO4, K2HPO4, starch, and soybean meal influence delta-endotoxin production
Potential research questions:
Is ATP synthase activity coordinated with toxin production?
Do energy metabolism pathways influence toxin yield?
Can manipulation of ATP synthase affect virulence factor production?
Comparative ecology approach:
Comparison with related species like B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (which produces Cry toxins active against dipteran larvae)
Assessment of ATP synthase adaptation in strains from different ecological niches
Evaluation of energy metabolism differences between insecticidal and non-insecticidal strains
Researchers working with ATP synthase components often encounter several challenges that require specific troubleshooting approaches:
Expression challenges:
Low expression levels
Solution: Optimize codon usage for expression host
Screen different promoter systems
Test various induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, timing)
Protein insolubility
Solution: Express as fusion protein with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, TrxA)
Lower induction temperature (16-20°C)
Add osmolytes or folding enhancers to growth media
Consider cell-free expression systems
Toxicity to expression host
Solution: Use tightly regulated expression systems
Employ specialized strains designed for toxic protein expression
Use lower copy number plasmids
Purification challenges:
Aggregation during purification
Solution: Include stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific salt concentrations)
Add mild detergents for membrane-associated components
Optimize buffer conditions (pH, ionic strength)
Consider on-column refolding protocols
Co-purification of contaminants
Solution: Implement multi-step purification strategy
Include additional washing steps with higher salt or low concentrations of denaturants
Consider ion exchange chromatography as an orthogonal purification step
Proteolytic degradation
Solution: Add protease inhibitors throughout purification
Decrease purification time and temperature
Remove flexible regions prone to proteolysis through construct design
Quality control methods:
SDS-PAGE and western blotting to assess purity and integrity
Size exclusion chromatography to evaluate oligomeric state
Mass spectrometry to confirm identity and detect modifications
Circular dichroism to verify secondary structure content
Thermal shift assays to assess stability under different buffer conditions
Ensuring that purified recombinant ATP synthase subunit delta retains its functional properties is crucial for meaningful experiments:
Structural integrity assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy:
Measure far-UV CD spectrum (190-260 nm) to assess secondary structure content
Compare with predicted secondary structure based on computational models
Perform thermal denaturation to determine stability
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS):
Analyze oligomeric state and homogeneity
Determine absolute molecular weight
Detect potential aggregation
Functional assays:
Binding assays with interacting partners:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with other ATP synthase components
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to measure binding thermodynamics
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) for sensitive detection of interactions
Reconstitution experiments:
Combine with other purified ATP synthase components
Assess complex formation by native PAGE or analytical ultracentrifugation
Measure ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activity of reconstituted complexes
Compare activity with and without subunit delta to assess functional contribution
Validation approaches:
Limited proteolysis to probe folding and domain organization:
Incubate with proteases at low concentrations
Analyze digestion patterns by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Compare with predictions based on structural models
Thermal stability assays:
Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) to measure unfolding transitions
Test stability in different buffer conditions
Assess effects of potential ligands or interacting partners on stability
By combining multiple complementary approaches, researchers can gain confidence in the structural and functional integrity of their purified recombinant ATP synthase subunit delta before proceeding to more complex experiments.