Recombinant Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A (rsmA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested. Please contact us in advance; additional fees will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a particular tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rsmA; ksgA; BT_4043; Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A; EC 2.1.1.182; 16S rRNA; adenine(1518)-N(6)/adenine(1519)-N(6))-dimethyltransferase; 16S rRNA dimethyladenosine transferase; 16S rRNA dimethylase; S-adenosylmethionine-6-N'; N'-adenosyl(rRNA) dimethyltransferase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-267
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (strain ATCC 29148 / DSM 2079 / NCTC 10582 / E50 / VPI-5482)
Target Names
rsmA
Target Protein Sequence
MKLVKPKKFL GQHFLKDLKV AQDIADTVDT FPELPVLEVG PGMGVLTQFL VKKDRLVKVV EVDYESVAYL REAYPSLEDH IIEDDFLKMN LHRLFDGKPF VLTGNYPYNI SSQIFFKMLE NKDIIPCCTG MIQKEVAERI AAGPGSKTYG ILSVLIQAWY KVEYLFTVSE HVFNPPPKVK SAVIRMTRND TKELGCDEKL FKQVVKTTFN QRRKTLRNSI KPILGKDCPL TEDALFNKRP EQLSVEEFIS LTNQVEEALK TATASGN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein specifically dimethylates two adjacent adenosines (A1518 and A1519) in the loop of a conserved hairpin near the 3'-end of 16S rRNA within the 30S ribosomal subunit. It likely plays a crucial role in 30S subunit biogenesis.

Database Links

KEGG: bth:BT_4043

STRING: 226186.BT_4043

Protein Families
Class I-like SAM-binding methyltransferase superfamily, rRNA adenine N(6)-methyltransferase family, RsmA subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the function of ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A (rsmA) in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron?

Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A (rsmA) in B. thetaiotaomicron plays a critical role in post-transcriptional modification of 16S rRNA. Similar to its homolog KsgA in E. coli, it catalyzes the methylation of two adjacent adenosine residues in the 3'-end of the small ribosomal subunit rRNA . This methylation is essential for proper ribosome assembly and function. Research indicates that rsmA knockout in bacterial species results in the accumulation of 17S rRNA precursor, suggesting its involvement in ribosome maturation processes . In the context of B. thetaiotaomicron, an important gut commensal, rsmA likely contributes to the organism's ability to adapt to changing gut conditions, particularly during stress responses.

How does B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA differ structurally and functionally from similar methyltransferases in other bacterial species?

While both serve similar core functions in ribosome biogenesis, B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA exhibits distinct structural features compared to homologs in other bacterial species. The structural differences likely reflect adaptations to B. thetaiotaomicron's anaerobic gut environment, where RNA biology has evolved to suit specific ecological niches . Comparatively, E. coli's rsmA (also known as KsgA) has been extensively characterized, with knockout studies showing effects on ribosome assembly and 17S rRNA precursor accumulation .

B. thetaiotaomicron's rsmA likely demonstrates context-specific activities related to its role in gut adaptation, potentially including specialized interactions with other RNA-binding proteins that are part of the bacterium's RNA regulatory network. Computational analyses suggest that B. thetaiotaomicron RNA-binding proteins have evolved specific functions to regulate polysaccharide metabolism, which is crucial for this bacterium's ecological success in the human intestine .

What experimental approaches are recommended for initial characterization of recombinant B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA?

Table 1: Recommended Experimental Approaches for rsmA Characterization

ApproachMethodologyExpected OutcomesConsiderations
Expression AnalysisRNA-seq, differential RNA-seqTranscriptional units and expression levels under different conditionsIntegrate with transposon mutant fitness data
Knockout StudiesCRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, transposon mutagenesisPhenotypic changes, ribosome profiles, rRNA precursor accumulationConsider analyzing under multiple growth conditions
Protein PurificationRecombinant expression, affinity chromatographyPurified protein for in vitro assaysEnsure anaerobic conditions if necessary
Methylation AssaysMass spectrometry, primer extensionIdentification of methylation sites and efficiencyCompare with other bacterial rsmA orthologs
Structure DeterminationX-ray crystallography, cryo-EMStructural insights for functional analysisConsider co-crystallization with RNA substrates

For initial characterization, researchers should combine transcriptomic approaches with knockout studies. Differential RNA-seq methodologies as applied to B. thetaiotaomicron in recent research provide valuable insights into transcriptional regulation across different conditions . Integration with transposon mutant fitness data can help identify condition-specific functions of rsmA. Purification of recombinant rsmA followed by in vitro methylation assays will confirm its enzymatic activity and substrate specificity.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA?

When expressing recombinant B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA, researchers should consider several expression systems with specific optimizations:

For homologous expression within B. thetaiotaomicron, plasmid systems such as pNLY1-PsusA have been successfully used for gene overexpression, as demonstrated in studies examining RhaR overexpression . This approach maintains the natural cellular environment for proper protein folding and potential co-factors.

Regardless of the chosen system, fusion tags (His6, MBP, or GST) can facilitate purification while potentially enhancing solubility. Expression should be optimized through testing multiple induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, and duration) with verification by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

How can researchers develop a reliable assay to measure the methyltransferase activity of recombinant B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA?

A robust methyltransferase activity assay for B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA should incorporate these methodological elements:

  • Substrate preparation: Isolate or in vitro transcribe the 16S rRNA target sequence. For specificity testing, prepare both unmethylated and pre-methylated substrates.

  • Reaction conditions: Use a buffer system mimicking physiological conditions in B. thetaiotaomicron (pH, ionic strength). Include S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as methyl donor and appropriate divalent cations (typically Mg²⁺).

  • Detection methods:

    • Radiometric assay: Use ³H-labeled SAM and measure incorporation by scintillation counting

    • Mass spectrometry: Identify methylated nucleotides directly

    • Antibody-based detection: Use antibodies specific to methylated adenosines

    • Primer extension analysis: Methylation causes reverse transcriptase to pause or terminate

  • Controls and validation:

    • Use known rRNA methyltransferases (e.g., E. coli KsgA) as positive controls

    • Include no-enzyme and no-SAM negative controls

    • Conduct kinetic analyses to determine Km and Vmax values

Researchers should validate substrate specificity by testing the enzyme with various rRNA fragments to confirm target recognition patterns of B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA.

What knockout or knockdown approaches are most effective for studying B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA function in vivo?

For genetic manipulation of B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA, researchers have several options with varying advantages:

Complete gene deletion has been successfully implemented for studying RNA-binding protein functions in B. thetaiotaomicron, as demonstrated with rbpA and rbpB . This approach provides clear phenotypic observations but may be problematic if rsmA is essential.

Inducible knockdown systems using antisense RNA or CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) allow for temporal control of gene expression, particularly valuable if complete knockout proves lethal. This approach enables studying rsmA function at different growth phases.

Point mutations targeting catalytic residues can separate the structural role of rsmA from its enzymatic function, revealing distinct aspects of its biological role.

When implementing these approaches, researchers should:

  • Verify knockout/knockdown efficiency by RT-qPCR or Western blotting

  • Examine phenotypes under multiple environmental conditions, as B. thetaiotaomicron demonstrates condition-specific gene expression patterns

  • Analyze ribosome assembly profiles to detect accumulation of precursor rRNAs

  • Sequence the genome of knockout strains after extended growth to identify compensatory mutations, as B. thetaiotaomicron has been shown to undergo rapid genetic adaptation in the gut environment

How does B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA activity change under oxidative stress conditions?

B. thetaiotaomicron's response to oxidative stress involves complex adaptive mechanisms that likely include modulation of rsmA activity. Research indicates that B. thetaiotaomicron undergoes specific genetic adaptations during inflammatory conditions in the gut, which are characterized by elevated oxidative stress .

When exposed to oxidative environments, B. thetaiotaomicron exhibits metabolic shifts that enhance its stress tolerance. For example, rhamnose metabolism in B. thetaiotaomicron has been associated with reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and improved resistance to oxidative stress compared to glucose metabolism . The regulation of rRNA methylation by rsmA may be part of this adaptive response.

Methodologically, researchers investigating rsmA activity under oxidative stress should:

  • Compare methylation patterns in normal versus oxidative stress conditions using RNA-seq and methylation-specific sequencing

  • Measure expression levels of rsmA using qRT-PCR under various oxidative stress conditions

  • Analyze ribosome assembly profiles in wild-type versus rsmA mutant strains under oxidative stress

  • Assess the impact of rsmA activity on the translation of stress-response proteins

This research area is particularly relevant given B. thetaiotaomicron's role as a gut commensal that must adapt to inflammatory conditions during host-pathogen interactions .

What is the relationship between rsmA function and B. thetaiotaomicron's metabolic adaptation to different carbon sources?

B. thetaiotaomicron is renowned for its metabolic versatility, particularly in carbohydrate utilization. Recent research demonstrates that its transcriptional landscape significantly changes during growth on different carbon sources . The relationship between rsmA activity and these metabolic shifts remains an intriguing area for investigation.

rsmA likely influences translation efficiency of key metabolic enzymes through its role in ribosome maturation. In E. coli, rsmA (KsgA) knockout affects the expression of numerous proteins , suggesting a similar regulatory role may exist in B. thetaiotaomicron.

Table 2: Potential Relationships Between rsmA and Carbon Metabolism

Carbon SourceExpected rsmA InfluenceExperimental ApproachRelevant Pathways
GlucoseBaseline methylation activityCompare wild-type vs. rsmA mutant growth ratesCentral carbon metabolism
RhamnosePotentially elevated activity to support stress responseMeasure rsmA expression during rhamnose utilizationRhaKIPAO pathway
Dietary polysaccharidesPossible coordination with RNA-binding proteinsCo-expression analysis of rsmA and RBPsPolysaccharide utilization loci (PULs)
Host-derived glycansMay influence adaptation to intestinal environmentIn vivo colonization studies with rsmA mutantsMucin degradation pathways

To investigate these relationships, researchers should:

  • Compare transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of wild-type and rsmA mutant strains when grown on different carbon sources

  • Analyze ribosome assembly and translation efficiency during carbon source shifts

  • Examine potential interactions between rsmA and other RNA regulators involved in carbohydrate metabolism, such as the RNA-binding proteins that regulate polysaccharide utilization

How do intestinal inflammation conditions affect the expression and activity of B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA?

Intestinal inflammation creates a challenging environment for gut commensals like B. thetaiotaomicron, characterized by increased oxidative stress, altered nutrient availability, and host immune factors. Evidence suggests that B. thetaiotaomicron undergoes rapid and reproducible genetic adaptation when exposed to inflammatory conditions in the gut .

The expression and activity of rsmA during inflammation may be modulated as part of B. thetaiotaomicron's adaptive response. Research has shown that certain B. thetaiotaomicron populations exhibit enhanced resistance to oxidative stress through genetic adaptations during infection-induced inflammation . These adaptations likely involve changes in RNA processing and translation regulation, potentially implicating rsmA.

To investigate the relationship between inflammation and rsmA:

  • Employ mouse models of colitis to analyze B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA expression in vivo during inflammation

  • Compare methylation patterns of 16S rRNA between B. thetaiotaomicron isolated from healthy versus inflamed intestinal environments

  • Assess the competitive fitness of wild-type versus rsmA mutant strains during inflammation

  • Examine if inflammation-induced genetic adaptations in B. thetaiotaomicron involve rsmA mutations or altered expression

These studies would provide valuable insights into how B. thetaiotaomicron modulates translation through rRNA methylation during host inflammatory responses.

What are the main challenges in purifying active recombinant B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA, and how can they be overcome?

Purifying active recombinant B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA presents several technical challenges that can be addressed through specific methodological approaches:

Challenge 1: Protein solubility and folding

  • Solution: Use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP, SUMO, or Thioredoxin) that can be cleaved post-purification

  • Solution: Express at lower temperatures (16-20°C) to slow folding and reduce inclusion body formation

  • Solution: Include molecular chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK) during expression

Challenge 2: Maintaining anaerobic conditions

  • Solution: Perform expression and purification steps under controlled anaerobic conditions

  • Solution: Include reducing agents (DTT, β-mercaptoethanol) in all buffers

  • Solution: Consider using anaerobic expression hosts like Bacteroides species themselves

Challenge 3: Co-factor requirements

  • Solution: Supplement purification buffers with potential co-factors (SAM, Mg²⁺)

  • Solution: Avoid chelating agents (EDTA) that might strip essential metal ions

Challenge 4: Enzyme stability

  • Solution: Include glycerol (10-20%) and appropriate salt concentrations to enhance stability

  • Solution: Optimize buffer conditions through thermal shift assays

  • Solution: Consider storage in small aliquots with cryoprotectants

When evaluating purification success, researchers should assess both protein purity (SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry) and functional activity (methyltransferase assays) to ensure the recombinant rsmA maintains its native catalytic properties.

How can researchers distinguish between direct and indirect effects of rsmA mutation in B. thetaiotaomicron?

Distinguishing direct from indirect effects of rsmA mutation requires comprehensive experimental designs:

Complementation studies: Reintroduce wild-type rsmA or catalytically inactive mutants to knockout strains to determine which phenotypes are directly reversible by restoring rsmA function. This approach has been used successfully for studying RNA-binding proteins in B. thetaiotaomicron .

Temporal analysis: Use inducible expression systems to examine immediate versus delayed effects following rsmA restoration, helping separate primary (direct) from secondary (indirect) consequences.

Molecular interaction mapping:

  • RNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (RIP-seq) to identify direct RNA targets

  • Ribosome profiling to identify specific mRNAs whose translation is affected

  • Structural studies to confirm direct binding interactions

Comparative multi-omics:

  • Integrate transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data to construct regulatory networks

  • Apply similar approaches used in the comprehensive transcriptome atlas for B. thetaiotaomicron

  • Compare immediate versus long-term changes following rsmA inactivation

Targeted validation: For suspected direct targets, perform in vitro binding and methylation assays using recombinant rsmA and synthetic RNA substrates to confirm direct interactions.

These approaches collectively provide a framework for distinguishing primary effects of rsmA from downstream consequences of altered ribosome assembly and function.

What are effective strategies for studying B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA interactions with other RNA-binding proteins?

B. thetaiotaomicron possesses multiple RNA-binding proteins that potentially interact with rsmA in regulatory networks. Research has identified RNA-binding proteins like RbpA, RbpB, and RbpC that regulate polysaccharide metabolism in this bacterium . Understanding potential functional interactions between rsmA and these proteins requires specific experimental approaches:

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use tagged versions of rsmA to pull down interacting proteins, followed by mass spectrometry identification. This approach can identify physical interactions within protein complexes.

Bacterial two-hybrid systems: Adaptations of yeast two-hybrid systems for bacterial proteins can screen for direct protein-protein interactions between rsmA and other RNA-binding proteins.

Genetic interaction analysis:

  • Generate double knockout strains (e.g., ΔrsmA ΔrbpB)

  • Assess synthetic phenotypes that differ from single knockouts

  • Example methodology includes approaches used for studying Δrbp double mutants in B. thetaiotaomicron

RNA-mediated interactions:

  • CLIP-seq (Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing) to identify overlapping RNA targets

  • RNA bridge pull-down assays to detect proteins binding to the same RNA molecule

Functional complementation tests: Determine if overexpression of one RNA-binding protein can compensate for the loss of another, suggesting functional overlap.

Through these complementary approaches, researchers can uncover the network of interactions between rsmA and other RNA regulators, providing insights into the coordinated control of translation and gene expression in B. thetaiotaomicron.

How might rsmA contribute to B. thetaiotaomicron's adaptation in the human gut microbiome?

rsmA likely plays a critical role in B. thetaiotaomicron's gut adaptation capabilities through several mechanisms:

Translation regulation during stress conditions: As a ribosomal RNA methyltransferase, rsmA may modulate translation efficiency during oxidative stress, nutrient limitation, or pH fluctuations — all common challenges in the intestinal environment. Research has demonstrated that B. thetaiotaomicron undergoes genetic adaptation during inflammatory conditions, suggesting active mechanisms for stress response .

Impact on competitive fitness: The methylation state of ribosomes may influence growth rates and metabolic efficiency, affecting B. thetaiotaomicron's competitive advantage within the gut ecosystem. Changes in translation machinery could enable rapid adaptation to changing nutrient landscapes.

Host-microbe interaction modulation: rRNA modifications potentially influence the translation of surface proteins and metabolic enzymes that mediate interactions with host cells. Modified translation machinery might optimize expression of proteins involved in immune evasion or beneficial host interactions.

Biofilm formation regulation: Translation regulation through rsmA could affect expression of biofilm-related proteins, influencing community structure within the gut microbiome.

Future research should employ gnotobiotic mouse models with wild-type and rsmA mutant strains to assess colonization efficiency, persistence during perturbations (antibiotics, diet changes), and interactions with other microbiome members.

What potential exists for targeting B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA in microbiome engineering applications?

The potential for utilizing B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA in microbiome engineering presents several promising research avenues:

Engineered probiotics: Modifying rsmA expression could enhance B. thetaiotaomicron's stress resistance, enabling the development of robust probiotic strains that maintain beneficial functions under challenging gut conditions. This approach could leverage B. thetaiotaomicron's natural ability to metabolize diverse polysaccharides while improving its persistence.

Tunable gene expression systems: rsmA's role in translation regulation could be exploited to develop post-transcriptional control systems for engineered gene circuits in B. thetaiotaomicron. Such systems could modulate the production of therapeutic proteins or metabolites in response to gut conditions.

Microbiome stabilization: Understanding how rsmA contributes to B. thetaiotaomicron's ecological fitness could inform strategies to maintain beneficial Bacteroides populations during dysbiosis. Research has shown B. thetaiotaomicron adapts genetically to inflammatory conditions , and manipulating rsmA might enhance this adaptive capacity.

Synthetic biology applications:

  • Design of translation control elements responsive to specific gut signals

  • Development of B. thetaiotaomicron as a chassis for engineered gut microbiota

  • Creation of diagnostic strains that respond to inflammation by modulating rsmA-dependent translation

These applications require further characterization of rsmA's specific targets and regulatory mechanisms, as well as development of genetic tools for precise manipulation of B. thetaiotaomicron in the gut environment.

How might comparative studies of rsmA across different Bacteroides species inform our understanding of translation regulation in the gut microbiome?

Comparative analysis of rsmA across Bacteroides species represents a valuable approach to understanding translation regulation evolution in the gut microbiome:

Evolutionary conservation and divergence: Sequence and structural analysis of rsmA orthologs can reveal conserved catalytic domains versus species-specific adaptations. Computational approaches combining both sequence and structural analysis, as demonstrated for other Bacteroides RNA families , would be particularly informative.

Niche-specific adaptations: Comparing rsmA from Bacteroides species occupying different gut niches (proximal vs. distal colon, mucosal vs. luminal) may reveal adaptations to specific microenvironments. This approach aligns with research showing how B. thetaiotaomicron adapts to different intestinal conditions .

Function-structure relationships: By correlating structural differences in rsmA across species with differences in methylation patterns, researchers can identify critical determinants of substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency.

Regulatory network comparisons:

  • Examine how rsmA integrates with species-specific RNA regulatory networks

  • Compare interplay between rsmA and RNA-binding proteins across Bacteroides species

  • Analyze correlation between rsmA variations and polysaccharide utilization capabilities

Methodological approach:

  • Sequence analysis of rsmA across multiple Bacteroides species

  • Heterologous expression studies swapping rsmA between species

  • Comparative ribosome profiling to identify species-specific translation regulation

  • Functional complementation tests across species barriers

These comparative studies would reveal how translation regulation has evolved within the Bacteroides genus to support diverse ecological strategies within the gut microbiome.

What are the most significant recent advances in understanding B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA function?

Recent advances in understanding B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA function have been driven by technological developments in RNA biology and microbial genetics:

The expanded transcriptome atlas for B. thetaiotaomicron represents a significant advancement in understanding gene expression regulation across diverse conditions relevant to the gut environment . This resource provides unprecedented insight into transcriptional responses of B. thetaiotaomicron to stresses and nutrient shifts, creating a foundation for understanding rsmA expression patterns.

Studies demonstrating B. thetaiotaomicron's rapid genetic adaptation during intestinal inflammation highlight the importance of translation regulation mechanisms in maintaining fitness during host-induced stress . While not directly focusing on rsmA, these findings emphasize the dynamic nature of B. thetaiotaomicron's genome and regulatory systems during adaptation.

Advances in comparative genomics approaches for Bacteroides RNA biology have enabled prediction of RNA structures and identification of RNA-binding proteins with unprecedented accuracy . These computational frameworks provide essential tools for characterizing rsmA and its interaction partners.

Research on Bacteroides RNA-binding proteins has revealed their role in regulating polysaccharide metabolism, suggesting potential functional interactions with translation regulatory systems like rsmA . These findings point to complex regulatory networks coordinating metabolism and stress responses in B. thetaiotaomicron.

Collectively, these advances provide a foundation for understanding rsmA function within the broader context of B. thetaiotaomicron's adaptive strategies in the dynamic gut environment.

What controls and standards should be included in experimental designs studying B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA?

Robust experimental designs for studying B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA require comprehensive controls and standards:

Genetic manipulation controls:

  • Include wild-type strain alongside any mutant for direct comparison

  • Employ complementation controls (reintroduction of functional rsmA) to verify phenotype specificity

  • Use catalytically inactive rsmA mutants to distinguish structural from enzymatic functions

Expression analysis standards:

  • Validate qPCR reference genes specifically for B. thetaiotaomicron under study conditions

  • Include time-course measurements to capture dynamic responses

  • Normalize expression to cell density consistently across experiments

Growth condition standardization:

  • Define precise media composition for reproducibility across laboratories

  • Maintain consistent anaerobic conditions with verified oxygen levels

  • Document growth phase for all experiments (early log, mid-log, stationary)

Methylation assay controls:

  • Include unmethylated rRNA substrates as negative controls

  • Use pre-methylated substrates to establish assay ceilings

  • Include E. coli KsgA as a comparative positive control

In vivo experiment considerations:

  • Use defined microbiota mouse models with consistent dietary regimens

  • Include multi-strain competition assays to assess relative fitness

  • Monitor stability of genetic constructs throughout in vivo passages

These rigorous controls align with the comprehensive experimental approaches used in recent B. thetaiotaomicron studies and ensure reliable, reproducible results when investigating rsmA function.

How should researchers interpret conflicting data regarding B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA function across different experimental systems?

When encountering conflicting data regarding B. thetaiotaomicron rsmA function, researchers should employ systematic analytical approaches:

Context-dependent function analysis:

  • Consider that rsmA may perform different functions depending on growth conditions

  • Examine how B. thetaiotaomicron's transcriptional landscape changes across conditions

  • Analyze whether conflicting results correlate with specific environmental parameters (pH, redox state, nutrient availability)

Methodological discrepancy assessment:

  • Compare experimental protocols for key differences in media composition, growth conditions, or genetic backgrounds

  • Evaluate whether heterologous vs. homologous expression systems affect protein function

  • Consider if differences in detection methods influence observed outcomes

Strain variation considerations:

  • Sequence verify rsmA gene and regulatory regions across laboratory strains

  • Assess whether B. thetaiotaomicron's capacity for rapid genetic adaptation may have introduced strain differences

  • Consider potential suppressor mutations that arise after rsmA manipulation

Integrative data analysis approach:

  • Map conflicting observations to specific experimental variables

  • Design bridging experiments that systematically vary conditions between conflicting protocols

  • Employ multiple complementary techniques to address the same question

  • Consider whether seemingly conflicting data might reveal condition-specific regulation

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.