Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Tag type is determined during production. Please specify your required tag type for prioritized development.
KEGG: bhe:BH00020
STRING: 283166.BH00020
BH00020 likely resides within a variable genomic region, similar to other characterized B. henselae virulence factors. Current sequencing data suggests B. henselae maintains a largely conserved genome while harboring variable genomic islands that contain important virulence factors . For proper characterization of the BH00020 genomic region, researchers should employ long-read sequencing technologies, particularly if the gene contains repetitive elements. These technologies facilitate differentiation of close variants and effectively cover highly repetitive stretches without significant assembly problems, as demonstrated with the BadA genomic island .
Methodologically, researchers should perform comparative genomic analysis across multiple B. henselae isolates, similar to approaches used to characterize the BadA island, to identify potential variability in the BH00020 region that might reflect host adaptation processes.
Based on successful expression of other B. henselae proteins, recombinant BH00020 production should employ prokaryotic expression systems such as the pET200D/TOPO expression vector in E. coli BL21(DE3) . The methodology should include:
Gene amplification with primers containing appropriate restriction sites
Cloning into an expression vector with confirmation via Sanger sequencing
Transformation into expression host cells (E. coli BL21)
Induction of protein expression under optimized conditions
Protein purification via affinity chromatography
Researchers should verify correct protein expression through SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis, similar to approaches used for Pap31 protein, where purified recombinant proteins yielded distinct bands confirmed by Coomassie staining and immunoblotting . For protein interaction studies, maintaining proper folding is critical, so non-denaturing purification methods should be considered when functional assays are planned.
While specific information about BH00020 is limited in current literature, functional prediction requires comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of its domains. Other characterized B. henselae surface proteins provide relevant contexts - Pap31 functions as an adhesin for fibronectin, heparin, and human umbilical endothelial cells, mediating host-pathogen interactions , while BadA is crucial for binding to extracellular matrix proteins including fibronectin and collagen .
For rigorous domain analysis, researchers should:
Perform sequence alignment with known Maf-like proteins
Utilize structure prediction algorithms to identify potential functional domains
Compare identified domains with those in characterized virulence factors
Conduct hydrophobicity analysis to predict membrane association regions
Identify potential binding motifs for host cellular components
This approach would elucidate whether BH00020 contains domains consistent with adhesin functions, immune evasion, or other pathogenicity mechanisms common to B. henselae surface proteins.
B. henselae undergoes significant adaptation during host switching, with human-, feline-, and laboratory-adapted isolates displaying genomic and phenotypic differences related to outer membrane protein expression . To characterize potential variation in BH00020 expression:
Isolate B. henselae from different hosts (feline, human, and laboratory-adapted)
Grow strains under standardized conditions
Extract total RNA for quantitative RT-PCR analysis of BH00020 transcription
Prepare protein lysates for Western blot analysis using anti-BH00020 antibodies
Perform immunofluorescence microscopy to assess surface expression
Researchers should culture bacteria from different host origins under identical conditions to control for environmental factors affecting protein expression. This approach would reveal whether BH00020 undergoes differential regulation as part of the adaptive process between hosts, similar to what has been observed with BadA expression patterns .
Based on methodologies used for other B. henselae protein interaction studies, researchers should employ a multi-tiered approach:
Initial screening: Yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid systems to identify potential host protein interactors
Confirmation studies: Co-immunoprecipitation with BH00020-specific antibodies followed by mass spectrometry
Binding kinetics analysis: Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or microscale thermophoresis to determine binding affinities
Structural characterization: X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy of BH00020-host protein complexes
Functional validation: Cell-based assays using recombinant BH00020 to assess effects on host cell processes
For mass spectrometry analysis, proteins should be denatured with 8M urea and 100mM ammonium bicarbonate, reduced with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride, and alkylated with iodoacetamide before trypsin digestion. Analysis using high-resolution instruments such as Q Exactive HFX connected to an Easy-nLC 1200 would provide detailed peptide identification .
To determine the specific contributions of BH00020 to B. henselae pathogenesis, researchers should develop a markerless deletion mutant following methodologies established for BadA :
Construct a suicide vector containing approximately 1kb flanking regions up- and downstream of BH00020
Transform the construct into B. henselae via electroporation
Select transformants using antibiotic resistance markers
Induce second recombination event using counter-selection (e.g., sucrose sensitivity with sacB)
Confirm gene deletion via PCR, sequencing, and Western blot
The methodology should incorporate the following specific conditions based on established protocols:
Electroporation of approximately 4×10^8 competent B. henselae cells with 10μg purified plasmid DNA
Inclusion of TypeOne Restriction Inhibitor during transformation
Immediate recovery in specialized broth for 4 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2
Growth on selective media followed by PCR verification of proper integration
This approach enables precise analysis of BH00020's contribution to virulence through comparative studies between wild-type and deletion mutant strains .
The diagnostic potential of BH00020 should be evaluated systematically, considering the limitations observed with other B. henselae proteins like Pap31, which demonstrated 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity for human bartonellosis at a cutoff value of 0.215 . To assess BH00020's diagnostic value:
Express and purify full-length recombinant BH00020 and defined protein fragments
Develop ELISA protocols with optimized antigen coating concentrations
Test against serum panels from:
Confirmed B. henselae-infected patients
Patients with other bacterial infections (for cross-reactivity)
Healthy controls
The evaluation should include sensitivity, specificity, and cross-reactivity assessments with related pathogens. Researchers should determine optimal cutoff values through ROC curve analysis and establish whether full-length protein or specific domains provide superior diagnostic performance.
Bartonella infections have been associated with significant neurological manifestations including seizures, memory loss, fatigue, and headaches . Investigating BH00020's potential role in these manifestations requires:
Analyzing BH00020 expression in B. henselae isolates from patients with neurological symptoms
Testing BH00020 interactions with neural cell lines and blood-brain barrier models
Assessing inflammatory responses triggered by recombinant BH00020 in neural tissues
Evaluating antibody responses to BH00020 in cerebrospinal fluid from infected patients
The analysis should consider findings from studies of patients with Bartonella-associated neurological symptoms, where bacteremia was detected even in immunocompetent individuals . Table 1 illustrates the diversity of neurological manifestations observed in B. henselae infections:
| Manifestation | Frequency in documented cases | Associated with bacteremia |
|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | 6/6 patients | Yes |
| Headaches/Migraines | 5/6 patients | Yes |
| Memory loss/Disorientation | 3/6 patients | Yes |
| Seizures | 1/6 patients | Yes |
| Blurred vision | 1/6 patients | Yes |
| Paralysis | 1/6 patients | Yes |
This association with diverse neurological symptoms warrants investigation of whether BH00020 facilitates neurotropism or neuroinflammation during infection .
Studying potential antigenic variation in BH00020 faces challenges similar to those encountered with other B. henselae surface proteins. The highly repetitive nature of genes encoding surface proteins complicates accurate sequencing and assembly . Researchers should consider:
Using long-read sequencing technologies specifically optimized for repetitive regions
Implementing specialized assembly algorithms for highly repetitive DNA
Developing strain-specific antibodies to detect potential variations in protein expression
Employing epitope mapping to identify conserved versus variable regions
The application of Oxford Nanopore or PacBio SMRT sequencing would be particularly valuable for resolving repetitive regions that might undergo recombination, as observed with the BadA genomic island, where "active recombination mechanisms, possibly via phase variation (i.e., slipped-strand mispairing and site-specific recombination) within the repetitive badA island facilitate reshuffling of homologous domain arrays" .
Isolating BH00020-specific functions requires careful experimental design to address potential functional redundancy among Bartonella surface proteins. Researchers should:
Generate single and multiple knockout strains (ΔBH00020, ΔbadA, double mutants)
Perform complementation studies with controlled expression constructs
Utilize domain-swapping experiments to identify functional regions
Develop blocking antibodies against specific BH00020 epitopes
Design competitive binding assays to distinguish binding preferences
These approaches would help overcome challenges similar to those faced in Pap31 studies, where researchers found "either low sensitivity or questionable specificity," indicating that "recombinant Pap31 and the selected fragments may not be appropriate diagnostic targets" . Careful controls and comparative analyses between different protein systems are essential for accurate functional characterization.