Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, please indicate them during order placement. We will accommodate your request to the best of our ability.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If dry ice shipping is required, please contact us in advance; additional fees will apply.
Tag type determination occurs during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
KEGG: bhe:BH16560
STRING: 283166.BH16560
Bartonella henselae Succinyl-CoA ligase [ADP-forming] subunit beta (sucC) is a critical enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, catalyzing the reversible conversion of succinyl-CoA and ADP to succinate and ATP. As a mitochondrial matrix enzyme, it forms part of the Krebs cycle and plays an essential role in energy metabolism .
The enzyme consists of two subunits:
Alpha subunit (encoded by SUCLA1/SUCLG1)
Beta subunit (encoded by SUCLA2/SUCLG2, also known as sucC)
The beta subunit determines substrate specificity, dictating whether the enzyme utilizes ADP or GDP as a substrate . Research indicates that the enzyme may also interact with nucleoside diphosphate kinase, suggesting a potential role in nucleotide metabolism, which could impact bacterial replication and survival .
Recombinant B. henselae SucC is most commonly expressed in Escherichia coli expression systems. The general protocol involves:
Cloning: The sucC gene is amplified from B. henselae genomic DNA using PCR with specific primers that include appropriate restriction sites .
Vector construction: The amplified gene is typically cloned into an expression vector containing:
Expression: Transformation into E. coli expression strains (commonly BL21(DE3)) followed by induction with IPTG .
Purification: Using proprietary chromatographic techniques, primarily:
The resulting protein is typically a single, non-glycosylated polypeptide chain with a molecular mass of approximately 45-48 kDa . Purification typically yields protein with >80-95% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .
The stability of recombinant B. henselae SucC depends on proper storage conditions. Based on established protocols :
| Storage Duration | Recommended Conditions | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term (2-4 weeks) | 4°C | For entire vial usage within this timeframe |
| Long-term | -20°C | For extended periods |
| Buffer composition | 20mM HEPES buffer pH-7.6/8.0, 150-200mM NaCl with either 40% Sucrose or 20% Glycerol | Cryoprotectants prevent activity loss |
Important stability considerations:
Avoid multiple freeze-thaw cycles as they significantly reduce protein activity
Aliquoting before freezing is recommended for proteins that will be used multiple times
The presence of cryoprotectants (glycerol or sucrose) is crucial for maintaining the protein's native conformation during freezing
Recombinant B. henselae SucC has significant potential for diagnostic applications due to its immunogenic properties. Research has established that:
Serological detection: SucC belongs to the family of highly immunoreactive proteins produced by B. henselae, making it valuable for developing serological assays for Cat Scratch Disease (CSD) . Studies have shown that up to 95% of patients with CSD develop antibodies against B. henselae antigens .
ELISA development methodology:
Western blot applications:
Distinguishing between Bartonella species:
Research has shown that while the SucC-β peptide shares 81-93% identity with equivalent regions from other Bartonella species, specific epitopes can be identified for species-specific detection .
Several challenges have been reported when working with recombinant B. henselae SucC:
Expression challenges:
Purification issues:
Activity measurement:
Cross-reactivity in immunoassays:
Recent research has demonstrated that blood supplementation significantly enhances B. henselae growth and consequently protein expression . The following methodology has proven effective:
Optimal growth media:
Culture conditions:
Growth kinetics with blood supplementation:
| Culture Medium | Growth Without Blood | Growth With Blood | Optimal Sampling |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAPGM | Decreased over time | Increased through day 10 | Days 7, 14, 21 |
| Brugge | Moderate growth | Initial decrease, then significant increase after day 9 | After day 9 |
Inoculation protocol:
This enhanced growth methodology directly translates to improved protein yields when expressing recombinant SucC.
Studies suggest SucC may have multifunctional roles in B. henselae pathogenesis beyond its metabolic function :
Host-pathogen interaction studies:
Mouse model development:
Recent research has established a SCID/Beige immunocompromised mouse model that provides sustained B. henselae infection lasting up to 30 days, compared to the limited infection in immunocompetent mice . This model enables:
Methodological approaches to investigate SucC's role:
Gene knockout/knockdown: CRISPR-Cas9 or transposon mutagenesis to create SucC-deficient strains
Protein-protein interaction mapping: Pull-down assays with recombinant SucC to identify host interaction partners
Complementation studies: Reintroducing wild-type or mutant SucC to assess functional recovery
Comparative proteomics: Analyzing protein expression changes in SucC-deficient vs. wild-type strains
Enzymatic activity modulation:
Research has shown that SucC activity can be modulated by environmental conditions relevant to pathogenesis, suggesting its role may extend beyond metabolism to environmental adaptation during infection .
When facing contradictory results in B. henselae SucC research, implement this systematic approach to resolve discrepancies :
Comprehensive data examination:
Methodological evaluation:
Expression systems: E. coli strain variations (BL21 vs. Rosetta) can affect protein folding
Purification methods: Different chromatographic techniques may yield proteins with varying activity levels
Activity assays: Variations in buffer composition, pH, temperature, and substrate concentrations can significantly impact results
Standardization protocol:
Alternative explanations to consider:
Data reconciliation framework:
| Contradiction Type | Investigation Approach | Resolution Method |
|---|---|---|
| Activity discrepancies | Test multiple substrates (ADP vs. GDP) | Determine substrate preference |
| Structural variations | Circular dichroism or thermal shift assays | Identify stability conditions |
| Expression yield differences | Optimize codon usage and expression conditions | Standardize production protocol |
| Varied immunoreactivity | Epitope mapping | Identify conserved antigenic regions |
While B. henselae SucC has not been extensively studied as a vaccine candidate, several approaches show promise based on its characteristics and research with related proteins :
Epitope-based vaccine development:
Experimental approaches for vaccine evaluation:
T-cell stimulation assays: Measuring IFN-γ production by PBMCs exposed to recombinant SucC or derived peptides
Antibody neutralization tests: Evaluating whether anti-SucC antibodies can neutralize B. henselae infection in cell culture models
Challenge studies: Using the newly developed SCID/Beige mouse model to assess protection
Advantages of SucC as a vaccine component:
Formulation considerations:
The structure-function relationship of B. henselae SucC has been partially elucidated through comparative studies with homologs from other species:
Structural features:
The protein consists of a single polypeptide chain of approximately 45-48 kDa
Contains a conserved nucleotide-binding domain responsible for ADP binding
Features a CoA-binding domain critical for interaction with succinyl-CoA
Requires interaction with the alpha subunit (SucD) to form a functional heterodimer
Comparative analysis with other species:
Functional insights:
The beta subunit determines whether the enzyme utilizes ADP or GDP as a substrate
Mutations in homologous human genes (SUCLA2/SUCLG2) cause severe metabolic disorders, highlighting the enzyme's critical role
The enzyme's reverse reaction (ATP synthesis) may be particularly important under energy-limited conditions during infection
Species-specific variations:
| Species | Identity with B. henselae SucC | Key Functional Differences |
|---|---|---|
| B. bacilliformis | 81-93% | Minor variations in substrate affinity |
| B. quintana | ~90% | Similar kinetic properties |
| E. coli | 65-70% | Different regulatory mechanisms |
| Human | 40-45% | GDP preference rather than ADP |
Several enzymatic assays have been developed to characterize SucC activity, each with specific advantages:
Coupled spectrophotometric assays:
Forward reaction (succinyl-CoA → succinate):
Reverse reaction (succinate → succinyl-CoA):
Direct product quantification:
Isotope-based assays:
Recommended controls and validation:
Site-directed mutagenesis provides a powerful approach to investigate the catalytic mechanism of B. henselae SucC:
Experimental design for mutagenesis studies:
PCR-based all-recombinant cloning: A rapid and efficient methodology that requires no post-PCR modifications such as restriction digestion and phosphorylation
Primer design: Forward and reverse primers containing the desired mutation with ~15-20 nucleotides flanking the mutation site
PCR conditions: High-fidelity polymerase (e.g., Q5) with optimized annealing temperatures (typically 59-64°C)
Key residues for targeted mutagenesis:
Based on homology with well-characterized succinyl-CoA synthetases:
Functional analysis of mutants:
Steady-state kinetics: Determine kcat and Km values for wild-type and mutant enzymes
Isothermal titration calorimetry: Measure binding affinities for substrates
Thermal stability assays: Assess structural integrity using circular dichroism or differential scanning fluorimetry
pH-rate profiles: Identify ionizable groups essential for catalysis
Structure-guided mutagenesis strategy:
| Domain | Target Residues | Expected Effect | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotide binding | Conserved P-loop | Altered ADP/GDP specificity | Nucleotide preference assay |
| CoA binding | Hydrophobic pocket | Changed acyl-CoA affinity | ITC binding studies |
| Subunit interface | α/β interaction surface | Disrupted heterodimer formation | Size-exclusion chromatography |
| Catalytic site | His-Asp dyad | Reduced phosphoryl transfer | Product formation rate |
B. henselae SucC shows distinctive characteristics compared to other immunogenic proteins used in diagnostics:
Comparative immunoreactivity:
| Protein | Molecular Weight | Primary Antibody Response | Sensitivity in Diagnostics | Cross-reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SucC (SucB) | 45-48 kDa | IgG | High | Moderate with other Bartonella |
| Pap31 | 31 kDa | IgM | Very high (97.2%) | Low (species-specific) |
| GroEL | 60 kDa | IgG | Moderate | High with other bacteria |
| SCS-α | 30-31 kDa | IgM/IgG | High (34.5% for IgG) | Moderate |
Diagnostic performance characteristics:
SucC (SucB) shows high immunoreactivity, with up to 95% of Cat Scratch Disease patients developing antibodies against B. henselae antigens
Unlike Pap31, which is highly specific to particular Bartonella species, SucC shows some cross-reactivity with homologs from other Bartonella species (81-93% identity)
The immunogenic protein dihydrolipoamide-succinyltransferase (SucB) is considered one of the most important antigens for Cat Scratch Disease diagnosis
Advantages of SucC as a diagnostic target:
Limitations compared to other targets:
Several protocols have been developed for detecting anti-SucC antibodies in patient samples:
ELISA optimization for anti-SucC detection:
Antigen coating: 2-5 μg/mL of purified recombinant SucC in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6), incubated overnight at 4°C
Blocking: 3% BSA or 5% non-fat milk in PBS-T (0.05% Tween-20), 1-2 hours at room temperature
Sample dilution: 1:100-1:200 for serum samples in blocking buffer
Detection system: HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG or IgM (1:5000-1:10000)
Substrate: TMB with reaction stopped using 2N H₂SO₄, read at 450 nm
Controls: Include known positive and negative sera, as well as buffer-only wells
Western blot protocol:
Sample preparation: 0.5-1 μg recombinant SucC per lane on 12% SDS-PAGE
Transfer: Semi-dry or wet transfer to PVDF membrane (100V for 1 hour)
Blocking: 5% non-fat milk in TBS-T (0.1% Tween-20), 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody: Patient serum diluted 1:100-1:500 in blocking buffer, overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG/IgM (1:5000), 1 hour at room temperature
Line immunoassay approach:
Performance optimization:
Multiple experimental approaches can elucidate SucC's role in B. henselae metabolism and virulence:
Gene manipulation techniques:
Conditional knockdown: Using antisense RNA or CRISPR interference to reduce SucC expression without completely eliminating it
Allelic replacement: Generating point mutations in the chromosomal sucC gene to study specific residues
Complementation studies: Reintroducing wild-type or mutant sucC genes to confirm phenotypes
Metabolic studies:
Host-pathogen interaction studies:
Cell infection models: Comparing invasion and persistence of wild-type and SucC-deficient B. henselae in endothelial cells
Bacterial survival assays: Testing resistance to oxidative stress and nutrient limitation
SCID/Beige mouse model: Recently developed immunocompromised mouse model allowing for sustained B. henselae infection (up to 30 days)
Protein localization and trafficking:
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Using anti-SucC antibodies to track protein localization
Subcellular fractionation: Determining whether SucC is strictly cytoplasmic or associated with membranes
Bacterial two-hybrid system: Identifying protein interaction partners that might link metabolism to virulence
Expression analysis: