A key rRNA-binding protein, it directly interacts with 16S rRNA, facilitating the nucleation of the 30S ribosomal subunit platform by binding and bridging several 16S rRNA helices. It also forms an intersubunit bridge (bridge B4) with the 23S rRNA of the 50S subunit within the ribosome.
KEGG: bba:Bd1550
STRING: 264462.Bd1550
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is a small predatory deltaproteobacterium that parasitizes other Gram-negative bacteria through a complex lifecycle. Initially, motile B. bacteriovorus cells collide with host bacteria, attach at the point of contact opposite to their flagellum, and penetrate the host cell wall . The parasite then multiplies intracellularly between the cell wall and plasma membrane of the host, eventually leading to host cell lysis . While primarily known for parasitizing Gram-negative bacteria, certain strains can also attack Gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus through an "epibiotic" foraging strategy .
Studying ribosomal proteins like S15 (encoded by the rpsO gene) in B. bacteriovorus is particularly interesting due to the bacterium's unique predatory lifestyle, which may have influenced the evolution of its translation machinery compared to non-predatory bacteria.
Proper identification of B. bacteriovorus strains is essential before conducting any studies on specific genes like rpsO. Multiple complementary approaches should be used:
Plaque assay observation: B. bacteriovorus forms distinctive transparent, round plaques (0.5-0.7 cm diameter) on lawns of prey bacteria that expand after prolonged incubation, differentiating them from bacteriophage plaques .
PCR amplification: Use B. bacteriovorus-specific primers targeting:
Sequence analysis: Perform phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA sequences using software like MEGA with bootstrap analysis (1,000 replicates) to confirm taxonomic placement .
Microscopic examination: Gram staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to confirm morphological characteristics - B. bacteriovorus appears as rod-shaped bacteria approximately 0.4-0.5 μm wide and 0.8-0.9 μm long with a single polar flagellum .
The S15 ribosomal protein is relatively conserved across bacterial species, though with important variations that may reflect evolutionary adaptation. While the search results don't provide specific structural information about B. bacteriovorus S15, we can infer key characteristics based on ribosomal protein conservation patterns and available E. coli S15 data.
S15 typically functions in the assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit and binds directly to 16S rRNA. When comparing S15 proteins between species, researchers should examine:
Primary sequence conservation: Alignment analysis with homologous S15 proteins from related species
Secondary structure elements: Alpha helices and beta sheets that contribute to RNA binding
Key residues: Conservation of amino acids involved in rRNA interactions
Species-specific variations: Unique residues that may reflect adaptation to B. bacteriovorus' predatory lifestyle
The ability of E. coli S15 to be incorporated into Serratia marcescens ribosomes suggests some functional conservation across species boundaries , which may extend to B. bacteriovorus as well.
Based on established protocols for expressing ribosomal proteins and the specific information about rpsO gene cloning in E. coli , researchers can employ several expression systems:
When choosing an expression system, consider that E. coli rpsO was successfully cloned using pBR322 and incorporated into functional ribosomes in a different species (S. marcescens) . The pRF3 vector, which changes copy number depending on growth temperature in temperature-sensitive polA hosts, has also proven effective for studying ribosomal protein expression dynamics .
Codon optimization is critical when expressing B. bacteriovorus genes in E. coli due to potential differences in codon bias between these bacteria. A methodological approach includes:
Analyze native codon usage: Calculate the codon adaptation index (CAI) of native B. bacteriovorus rpsO sequence.
Identify rare codons: Map rare E. coli codons in the B. bacteriovorus sequence that might cause translational pausing or premature termination.
Optimize expression strategy:
Option A: Synthesize a codon-optimized gene for E. coli
Option B: Co-express rare tRNAs using specialized E. coli strains (e.g., Rosetta™, CodonPlus®)
Evaluate expression with pilot studies: Compare expression levels between native and optimized sequences.
Consider selective pressure: The expression of S15 is likely tightly regulated in nature, as demonstrated by the observation that even when plasmid copy number increased more than 20-fold, the relative synthesis rate of S15 only doubled , suggesting sophisticated feedback mechanisms.
Purifying recombinant S15 protein requires a multi-step approach:
Cell lysis optimization:
Sonication or French press for mechanical disruption
Lysozyme treatment (0.1-1 mg/ml) in appropriate buffer systems
Addition of nucleases to reduce contamination with nucleic acids
Initial capture:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) if using His-tagged constructs
Ion exchange chromatography based on S15's predicted isoelectric point
Intermediate purification:
Ammonium sulfate precipitation to separate protein fractions
Size exclusion chromatography to separate monomeric S15 from aggregates
Polishing step:
Reverse-phase HPLC for highest purity
Removal of affinity tags via specific proteases if needed
Quality control:
SDS-PAGE and western blotting to confirm identity and purity
Mass spectrometry to verify molecular weight and post-translational modifications
Circular dichroism to assess secondary structure integrity
Given that S15 interacts with RNA in its native context, researchers should verify that the purified recombinant protein retains RNA-binding capability through electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA).
B. bacteriovorus exhibits a unique biphasic lifecycle alternating between free-living attack phase and intraperiplasmic growth phase within its prey. This lifestyle may have placed selective pressures on its translation machinery:
Rapid protein synthesis requirements: During the intraperiplasmic growth phase, B. bacteriovorus rapidly synthesizes proteins using resources from its host . This may have led to adaptations in its ribosomal proteins, potentially including S15, to optimize translation efficiency under these conditions.
Host-derived translation components: Research should investigate whether B. bacteriovorus incorporates host-derived ribosomal components or must rely entirely on its own translation machinery during intracellular growth.
Regulatory adaptations: The observation that S15 synthesis increases only 2-fold despite a 20-fold increase in gene copy number suggests sophisticated regulation mechanisms. In B. bacteriovorus, these regulatory mechanisms may be specially adapted to coordinate rapid growth during the predatory cycle.
Structural adaptations: Comparative structural analysis of B. bacteriovorus S15 with homologs from non-predatory bacteria might reveal specific adaptations related to its predatory lifestyle.
Understanding S15's potential role in predation requires targeted experimental designs:
Gene knockout/knockdown studies:
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to create conditional S15 mutants
Evaluation of mutant phenotypes in predation efficiency assays
Complementation studies with native and modified S15 variants
Localization studies:
Fluorescent protein tagging of S15 to track localization during predatory cycle
Immunogold labeling for electron microscopy to achieve higher resolution localization
FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to study protein dynamics
Interaction studies:
Pull-down assays to identify prey proteins that might interact with B. bacteriovorus S15
Two-hybrid screening to detect potential protein-protein interactions
Crosslinking mass spectrometry to capture transient interactions
Comparative expression analysis:
RNA-seq to measure rpsO expression changes during different stages of predation
Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency of rpsO mRNA
Quantitative proteomics to measure S15 protein levels throughout the predatory cycle
Given B. bacteriovorus' predatory nature, researchers might investigate whether its ribosomal proteins interact with prey translation machinery:
Hybrid ribosome assembly assays:
In vitro reconstitution of ribosomes using components from both predator and prey
Functional testing of hybrid ribosomes through in vitro translation assays
Structural characterization of hybrid ribosomes using cryo-electron microscopy
Translation interference studies:
Introduction of recombinant B. bacteriovorus S15 into prey cells to observe effects
Cell-free translation systems to test direct effects on prey ribosomes
Competition assays between native prey S15 and B. bacteriovorus S15
Structural comparison:
Comparative modeling of S15 proteins from B. bacteriovorus and common prey species
Identification of structural differences that might enable competitive binding
Evolution analysis:
Phylogenetic analysis of S15 sequences across predatory and non-predatory bacteria
Selection pressure analysis to identify positively selected residues potentially involved in predation
Multiple complementary approaches can be used to determine S15 structure:
X-ray crystallography:
Expression and purification of sufficient quantities of recombinant S15 protein
Crystallization screening to identify optimal conditions
Data collection and structural determination at high resolution
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:
Isotopic labeling (15N, 13C) of recombinant S15
Collection of multidimensional NMR data
Structure calculation based on distance and angular constraints
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Particularly useful for visualizing S15 in the context of the whole ribosome
Single-particle analysis to achieve near-atomic resolution
Focused classification to improve resolution of the S15 region
In silico approaches:
Homology modeling based on structures of S15 from related species
Molecular dynamics simulations to study conformational flexibility
Protein-RNA docking to predict interactions with 16S rRNA
S15 primarily functions through RNA interactions, necessitating specialized techniques to characterize these interactions:
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA):
Titration of labeled RNA fragments with increasing concentrations of S15
Determination of binding constants and cooperativity
Competition assays to assess binding specificity
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Real-time monitoring of S15-RNA interactions
Determination of association and dissociation rates
Analysis of the effect of buffer conditions on binding kinetics
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):
Measurement of thermodynamic parameters of binding
Elucidation of the enthalpy-entropy balance of the interaction
Assessment of binding stoichiometry
Fluorescence-based methods:
Fluorescence anisotropy measurements with labeled RNA
FRET experiments to measure distances between labeled S15 and RNA
Microscale thermophoresis for binding affinity determination
Hydroxyl radical footprinting:
Identification of RNA regions protected by S15 binding
Mapping of the interaction interface at nucleotide resolution
Comparative analysis between predator and prey S15 proteins can reveal evolutionary adaptations:
| Feature | Typical Gram-negative S15 | Potential B. bacteriovorus S15 Adaptations | Methodological Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence conservation | Core functional residues conserved | Possible unique residues at RNA-binding interface | Multiple sequence alignment, conservation scoring |
| RNA-binding specificity | High affinity for specific 16S rRNA region | Potentially broader specificity | Comparative binding assays with heterologous RNAs |
| Protein stability | Moderate to high | Possibly enhanced for function during predation | Thermal shift assays, circular dichroism |
| Regulatory mechanisms | Translational autoregulation common | May have unique regulatory features | Reporter assays, structure probing of mRNA |
| Integration into ribosomes | Species-specific assembly pathways | May have flexibility for heterologous assembly | In vitro reconstitution experiments |
A thorough comparative analysis would involve examining S15 proteins from a range of bacteria including B. bacteriovorus, common prey species (E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and other predatory bacteria to identify convergent evolutionary adaptations.
Ribosomal proteins from predatory bacteria like B. bacteriovorus offer unique perspectives on bacterial evolution:
Adaptation to predatory lifestyle:
Comparative genomics to identify signatures of selection in ribosomal genes
Investigation of translation efficiency during rapid growth inside prey
Assessment of potential dual functions of ribosomal proteins in predation
Host-predator coevolution:
Analysis of ribosomal protein evolution rates in predator-prey pairs
Investigation of whether predatory bacteria target prey ribosomes during attack
Identification of potential resistance mechanisms in prey ribosomes
Biotechnological applications:
Cross-species compatibility:
Testing whether B. bacteriovorus S15 can function in heterologous systems
Investigation of the minimal set of species-specific features required for function
Development of hybrid ribosomes with enhanced properties
Several high-priority research directions emerge from current knowledge:
Structural biology approaches to determine high-resolution structures of B. bacteriovorus ribosomal proteins and complete ribosomes, particularly comparing attack phase and growth phase configurations.
Systems biology studies examining the dynamics of ribosome assembly and function during the predatory lifecycle, potentially revealing phase-specific adaptations.
Synthetic biology applications exploring whether unique features of B. bacteriovorus ribosomes can be harnessed for biotechnological purposes, such as specialized translation systems.
Comparative genomics across predatory bacteria to identify convergent adaptations in translation machinery related to predation.
Therapeutic applications investigating whether B. bacteriovorus ribosomal components could serve as targets for enhancing or regulating its activity as a "living antibiotic" .