KEGG: bba:Bd2962
STRING: 264462.Bd2962
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is a predatory bacterium that invades and consumes Gram-negative bacteria, including various pathogens. Its unique life cycle consists of two primary phases: the non-replicating attack phase (AP), where the predator actively searches for prey, and the intraperiplasmic phase (IP), which begins when the predator invades suitable prey. A third transition phase has also been identified where prey-derived cues trigger specific bdellovibrio transcription profiles .
Ribosomal protein L6 (rplF) is an essential component of the 50S ribosomal subunit involved in the late stage assembly of functional ribosomes. In B. bacteriovorus, L6 likely plays crucial roles in:
Ribosome assembly and stability during predatory growth
Translation efficiency during the rapid protein synthesis required for prey invasion and digestion
Potentially supporting the expression of hydrolytic enzymes necessary for prey consumption
The significance of L6 is heightened in B. bacteriovorus due to the organism's predatory lifestyle, which requires efficient protein synthesis to produce the numerous hydrolytic enzymes needed for prey digestion and utilization .
Expression and purification of recombinant B. bacteriovorus 50S ribosomal protein L6 typically follows this methodological workflow:
Most commonly, recombinant B. bacteriovorus proteins are expressed in E. coli systems using specialized expression vectors. For ribosomal proteins specifically, BL21(DE3) strains or derivatives are frequently employed due to their reduced protease activity .
PCR amplification of the rplF gene from B. bacteriovorus genomic DNA
Addition of appropriate restriction sites or recombination sequences
Insertion into an expression vector containing a suitable promoter and fusion tag
Based on protocols for other B. bacteriovorus proteins, optimal expression conditions typically include:
Induction at OD600 of 0.6-0.8
IPTG concentration of 0.5-1.0 mM
Post-induction growth at 16-25°C to enhance protein solubility
Expression time of 4-16 hours
A standard purification protocol would involve:
Cell lysis via sonication or pressure homogenization in a buffer containing protease inhibitors
Clarification by centrifugation (20,000 × g for 30 minutes)
Affinity chromatography using His-tag or other fusion tag
Size exclusion chromatography to increase purity
Buffer exchange to a stabilizing buffer
For optimal stability, the purified protein should be stored according to these parameters:
The protein concentration is typically determined using absorbance at 280 nm with the calculated extinction coefficient or via Bradford/BCA protein assays.
The structural and functional characteristics of B. bacteriovorus ribosomal protein L6 can be inferred from general ribosomal protein properties and specific data from related bacteria:
Typically consists of approximately 177 amino acids, similar to E. coli L6
Contains domains that interact with 23S rRNA, particularly helix 97
Likely possesses RNA-binding motifs essential for ribosome assembly
Features a tertiary structure that facilitates interactions with other ribosomal proteins
Ribosome assembly: Critical for the late stage assembly of the 50S ribosomal subunit. L6-depleted cells accumulate 45S precursor particles that lack L6, indicating its essential role in ribosome maturation .
Translation activity: L6 contributes to factor-dependent GTPase activity of the ribosome. Ribosomes lacking L6 show reduced GTPase activity, suggesting L6's involvement in interactions with translation factors .
Structural stability: Serves as a scaffold protein that helps maintain the integrity of the 50S subunit through interactions with rRNA and other ribosomal proteins.
Metabolic adaptation: Given B. bacteriovorus' predatory lifestyle and potential inability to synthesize some amino acids required for protein synthesis, L6 may have adapted to function efficiently under conditions where amino acids are derived from prey digestion .
The positioning of L6 near functional centers of the ribosome suggests it may influence translation efficiency and fidelity, which would be particularly important during the rapid growth phase within prey cells.
Ribosomal protein L6 shows varying degrees of conservation across bacterial species, with both preserved functional domains and species-specific adaptations:
While the search results don't provide direct sequence comparisons for B. bacteriovorus L6, database analysis tools like OrthoInspector can identify evolutionary relationships between L6 proteins from different species. In general, ribosomal proteins maintain conserved core domains involved in rRNA binding and ribosome assembly.
The predatory lifestyle of B. bacteriovorus may have driven specific adaptations in its translational machinery, including L6. These adaptations might include:
Altered affinity for rRNA or translation factors
Modified interactions with other ribosomal proteins
Optimized activity under the nutrient flux conditions experienced during prey consumption
The conservation of L6 across diverse bacterial phyla underscores its essential role in ribosome function. Comparative genomic analysis could reveal how sequence variations correlate with different bacterial lifestyles, providing insights into the evolutionary pressures shaping ribosomal proteins.
Understanding these similarities and differences is crucial for designing experiments that target L6 function specifically in B. bacteriovorus without affecting non-target organisms.
Researchers face several technical challenges when expressing and purifying recombinant B. bacteriovorus L6 protein:
Codon usage bias: B. bacteriovorus has a different codon usage pattern than common expression hosts like E. coli, potentially leading to:
Translational pausing
Premature termination
Low yield of full-length protein
Solution: Codon optimization or use of strains supplemented with rare tRNAs (e.g., Rosetta™)
Protein toxicity: Ribosomal proteins often interact with RNA and other cellular components, potentially causing toxicity when overexpressed in heterologous hosts.
Solution: Use of tightly regulated inducible promoters and lower induction temperatures (16-20°C)
Solubility issues: In the absence of their natural rRNA binding partners, ribosomal proteins often form insoluble aggregates.
Solution: Expression as fusion proteins with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, etc.) or inclusion of molecular chaperones
Nucleic acid contamination: L6's natural RNA-binding properties can result in co-purification with host RNA.
Solution: High-salt washes (500 mM-1M NaCl) and nuclease treatment during purification
Protein instability: Isolated ribosomal proteins may have reduced stability outside their natural complex.
Solution: Inclusion of stabilizing agents (glycerol 5-50%), optimal buffer conditions, and storage at -80°C
Protein authenticity: Ensuring the recombinant protein retains native folding and activity.
Solution: Circular dichroism spectroscopy to verify secondary structure elements and functional binding assays with 23S rRNA
Functional assessment: Verifying that purified L6 maintains its physiological activity is complex since its natural function occurs within the assembled ribosome.
Solution: In vitro reconstitution assays with 50S ribosomal components or complementation of L6-depleted strains
Structural integrity: Confirming proper folding is essential for functional studies.
Solution: Limited proteolysis to assess domain structure and thermal shift assays to evaluate protein stability
These challenges necessitate careful optimization of expression conditions, purification protocols, and validation methods to obtain functionally relevant recombinant B. bacteriovorus L6 protein.
Several genetic tools and approaches have been developed for B. bacteriovorus that can be adapted to manipulate L6 expression:
Four native B. bacteriovorus promoters have been identified as highly active during the attack phase: P1753, P3184, PAPsRNA5, and PmerRNA . These can be utilized to:
Drive constitutive expression of modified L6 proteins
Express additional copies of L6 with reporter tags
Create expression cassettes with varying strengths
The standard E. coli lac promoter shows weak expression in B. bacteriovorus, making native promoters preferable for robust expression .
Theophylline-activated riboswitches have been successfully demonstrated in B. bacteriovorus . This approach allows:
Chemical control of L6 expression levels
Creation of conditional L6 mutants
Temporal control of L6 function during predation cycles
The system can be designed by inserting the theophylline-responsive riboswitch (Theo-F) immediately downstream of the transcription start site of the rplF gene .
The suicide plasmid pK18mobsacB has been used for targeted gene modifications in B. bacteriovorus . For L6 manipulation, this approach enables:
Precise replacement of the native rplF gene with modified versions
Introduction of point mutations to study structure-function relationships
Creation of knock-in mutants with regulated expression
The protocol involves:
Cloning homologous regions flanking the integration site into pK18mobsacB
Conjugal transfer from E. coli S17-1 to B. bacteriovorus
Selection of merodiploids with kanamycin
Counter-selection with sucrose to identify double crossover events
Plasmids like pSUP404.2 have been successfully used in B. bacteriovorus . For L6 studies, these vectors allow:
Expression of tagged L6 variants
Co-expression of L6 with interacting partners
Introduction of multiple copies of L6 variants
The RBS Calculator tool has been employed to optimize ribosome binding sites for efficient translation in B. bacteriovorus . This approach enables:
Fine-tuning of L6 expression levels
Balancing expression of L6 with other experimental components
Creating an expression gradient for dose-dependent studies
For advanced functional studies, combinations of these tools can be implemented:
Riboswitch-controlled expression of the native L6 combined with constitutive expression of a modified L6
Dual reporter systems to monitor both L6 expression and predatory activity
Creation of L6 variant libraries with varying expression levels for high-throughput functional screening
These genetic tools provide researchers with multiple options for manipulating L6 expression to study its role in ribosome assembly, protein synthesis, and predatory behavior in B. bacteriovorus.
Ribosomal protein L6 potentially serves specialized functions throughout the distinct phases of B. bacteriovorus' predatory lifecycle:
During this non-replicative, high-motility phase, L6 likely contributes to:
Translation of proteins required for flagellar movement and chemotaxis
Synthesis of invasion-related proteins maintained in a predation-ready state
Efficient use of limited internal resources while searching for prey
The high activity of certain promoters during this phase suggests selective protein expression, in which L6-containing ribosomes would participate .
When B. bacteriovorus attaches to prey and prepares for invasion, L6 may be involved in:
Rapid translation reprogramming in response to prey-derived cues
Synthesis of proteins required for pore formation and entry into prey
Initial production of early-stage hydrolytic enzymes
The transition from free-living to invasion state represents a major metabolic shift that would require adaptable translation machinery .
Inside the bdelloplast (modified prey cell), L6 becomes especially critical during:
Extensive synthesis of hydrolytic enzymes that digest prey contents
Translation of proteins needed for DNA replication and filamentous growth
Adaptation to changing nutrient availability as prey components are metabolized
The ability of B. bacteriovorus to grow using exclusively prey-derived resources suggests its ribosomes, including L6, may have specialized adaptations for function under fluctuating amino acid and nucleotide pools .
As the predator divides into progeny cells, L6 likely participates in:
Translation of cell division proteins
Production of new ribosomes for progeny cells
Synthesis of proteins needed for flagella formation and progeny release
The synchronous septation pattern of B. bacteriovorus that allows both odd and even numbers of progeny suggests specialized control of division, possibly including tailored protein synthesis .
While direct experimental evidence specifically connecting L6 to predatory functions is limited, parallels can be drawn from related research:
Studies of the flagellar sigma factor fliA (controlled by riboswitches in experimental settings) showed that its regulation affects predation kinetics
L6-deficient E. coli shows impaired ribosome assembly and growth defects , suggesting that L6 perturbation in B. bacteriovorus would significantly impact its predatory capability
The essential nature of efficient protein synthesis throughout the predatory lifecycle positions L6 as a critical, if understudied, component of B. bacteriovorus' unique predatory mechanisms.
Investigating L6 function in the context of B. bacteriovorus predation requires integrating molecular genetics, biochemistry, and predation assays:
Conditional expression systems:
Domain mapping:
Generate targeted mutations in different functional domains of L6
Create chimeric L6 proteins combining domains from different bacterial species
Introduce fluorescent protein fusions to track L6 localization during predation
Ribosome profiling:
Isolate ribosomes from different predatory phases
Analyze ribosome composition and L6 incorporation
Compare translation efficiency between wild-type and L6-modified strains
Protein-RNA interaction studies:
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation to identify L6-interacting RNAs during predation
Use crosslinking approaches to capture transient interactions
Map binding sites of L6 on 23S rRNA in the context of predatory growth
Predation kinetics assays:
Quantify prey cell lysis rates using optical density measurements
Monitor predator population growth within prey using fluorescent markers
Compare wild-type with L6-modified strains across multiple prey species
Microscopy-based analyses:
Track predator-prey interactions using time-lapse microscopy
Visualize bdelloplast formation and development
Quantify septation patterns and progeny numbers in L6-modified strains
Use of synchronized predator populations to isolate specific predatory phases
Implementation of multicolor fluorescent labeling to distinguish predator-specific translation from prey-specific translation
Development of in vitro translation systems using isolated B. bacteriovorus ribosomes with modified L6 components
This multifaceted approach would provide comprehensive insights into how L6 contributes to the unique predatory lifestyle of B. bacteriovorus and potentially inform strategies for enhancing its use as a biocontrol agent .
The bacterial ribosome, including ribosomal proteins like L6, is central to antibiotic resistance through multiple mechanisms:
Target site modifications:
Mutations in ribosomal proteins can alter antibiotic binding sites
Modifications to rRNA (e.g., methylation) can prevent antibiotic interactions
Structural changes in the ribosome can reduce antibiotic affinity
Protection mechanisms:
Specialized proteins can bind to ribosomes, preventing antibiotic access
Alterations in ribosomal assembly can create drug-resistant ribosome populations
Heterogeneity in ribosome composition can contribute to population-level resistance
Research on trimethoprim (TMP) resistance in B. bacteriovorus provides insights into ribosome-related resistance mechanisms. One study identified that the gene bd3231 (encoding dihydrofolate reductase) confers high resistance to TMP when expressed in E. coli . While this doesn't directly involve L6, it demonstrates how bacterial species can possess intrinsic resistance mechanisms relevant to protein synthesis.
Structural adaptations:
Variations in L6 sequence between species may contribute to different antibiotic susceptibility profiles
L6 interactions with 23S rRNA could influence binding of macrolide antibiotics that target this region
Functional adaptations:
Ribosomal proteins as targets:
Understanding species-specific variations in L6 and other ribosomal proteins could enable development of narrow-spectrum antibiotics
Targeting ribosomal protein-rRNA interactions represents a potentially underexplored antibiotic strategy
B. bacteriovorus as a model:
Studying intrinsic antibiotic resistance in B. bacteriovorus could reveal novel resistance mechanisms
The predatory lifestyle may have driven unique adaptations in ribosomal components to function efficiently within prey cells
Resistance prediction:
Structural analysis of L6 and its interactions could help predict potential resistance mutations
Comparative genomics across bacterial species could identify natural variations in L6 that correlate with antibiotic susceptibility
Understanding the complex roles of ribosomal proteins like L6 in antibiotic resistance mechanisms is crucial for developing new antimicrobial strategies and predicting resistance evolution.
Modifications to ribosomal protein L6 could profoundly impact B. bacteriovorus ribosome assembly and function through several mechanisms:
Assembly defects:
Modifications to L6 domains that interact with 23S rRNA could disrupt the assembly pathway, potentially leading to accumulation of 45S precursor particles similar to observations in E. coli .
Altered assembly kinetics:
Changes affecting L6 incorporation could create a bottleneck in ribosome biogenesis, resulting in:
Slower formation of functional ribosomes
Accumulation of assembly intermediates
Disrupted stoichiometry of ribosomal components
Structural integrity:
L6 contributes to the structural stability of the 50S subunit through interactions with rRNA and neighboring proteins. Modifications could lead to:
Reduced subunit stability
Altered subunit association/dissociation dynamics
Formation of ribosomes with suboptimal conformations
Translation efficiency:
L6 modifications that affect GTPase activity could influence:
Initiation rates
Elongation speed
Termination efficiency
Ribosome recycling
Translation fidelity:
Alterations to L6 might affect:
tRNA selection accuracy
Reading frame maintenance
Stop codon recognition
Susceptibility to miscoding events
Response to regulatory factors:
Modified L6 could alter interactions with:
Translation factors (IF1/2/3, EF-Tu, EF-G)
Ribosome-associated quality control systems
Specialized regulatory factors
Predation kinetics:
Similar to the effects observed with fliA regulation , L6 modifications could result in:
Altered predation rates
Changes in prey preference or range
Modified bdelloplast development timeframes
Prey utilization efficiency:
B. bacteriovorus relies on prey-derived nutrients, including amino acids . L6 modifications affecting translation could impact:
Efficiency of prey resource utilization
Ability to adapt to different prey species
Yield of progeny cells per prey
Life cycle regulation:
Translation reprogramming is likely critical during transitions between predatory phases. L6 modifications might affect:
Attack phase to growth phase transition
Synchronization of progeny formation
Coordination of prey exit and new prey seeking
These predictions provide a framework for designing experimental studies on L6 function in B. bacteriovorus and understanding how ribosomal protein modifications might be leveraged to modulate predatory behavior for biotechnological applications.