Recombinant Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus Deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase (deoC)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for fulfillment based on your requirements.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested. Advance notification is required for dry ice shipments, and additional fees will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
deoC; dra; Bd3854Deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase; DERA; EC 4.1.2.4; 2-deoxy-D-ribose 5-phosphate aldolase; Phosphodeoxyriboaldolase; Deoxyriboaldolase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-220
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus (strain ATCC 15356 / DSM 50701 / NCIB 9529 / HD100)
Target Names
deoC
Target Protein Sequence
MQLSRYIDHT LLKPEAQTAQ IEKLCAEAKE HNFFSVCVNT SYVKTCAELL KDSSVKVCCV VGFPLGAMDT TSKAFETKTA IANGAQEIDM VIQIGALKDR RLDYVRDDIK AVVQAANGHT VKVIIETSLL NQEDKTLACK AALEAGAHFV KTSTGFGGGG ATVDDVKLMK SVVGSSMEVK ASGGIKDAQQ AKSMIDAGAT RLGTSSGITI IQGGSVQGGY
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Catalyzes a reversible aldol reaction between acetaldehyde and D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, producing 2-deoxy-D-ribose 5-phosphate.
Database Links

KEGG: bba:Bd3854

STRING: 264462.Bd3854

Protein Families
DeoC/FbaB aldolase family, DeoC type 1 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus and why is its deoC enzyme of interest to researchers?

Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is a small predatory bacterium that attacks other Gram-negative bacteria, including many animal, human, and plant pathogens . It exhibits a distinctive biphasic life cycle with two different cell types: non-replicating highly motile cells in the free-living phase and replicating cells during the intracellular-growth phase . The deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase (deoC) enzyme is of particular interest because it plays a critical role in nucleotide metabolism during the predatory lifecycle, potentially contributing to the organism's ability to utilize host resources during invasion and replication within prey bacteria.

How does the molecular structure of B. bacteriovorus deoC compare to similar enzymes in other bacterial species?

The deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase from B. bacteriovorus shares structural similarity with other bacterial deoC enzymes but may possess unique structural features that optimize its function within the predatory lifecycle. The enzyme typically adopts an (α/β)8 TIM barrel fold common to class I aldolases. Comparative structural analysis reveals that while the catalytic residues in the active site are conserved across bacterial species, B. bacteriovorus deoC may exhibit distinctive substrate binding pocket configurations that potentially reflect adaptations to its predatory lifestyle and the need to process nucleotides efficiently during prey invasion.

What is the typical expression pattern of deoC during the B. bacteriovorus life cycle?

The expression of deoC in B. bacteriovorus follows a regulated pattern throughout its biphasic life cycle. During the free-living, non-replicative phase, deoC expression remains relatively low, as the bacterium is primarily focused on motility and prey detection . Upon invasion of prey bacteria, deoC expression increases significantly as the predator transitions to the replicative phase, where nucleotide metabolism becomes essential for DNA replication. This expression pattern correlates with the bacterium's need to efficiently utilize host nucleotides and generate deoxyribose sugars during intracellular growth, supporting the multiple rounds of replication that occur prior to prey cell lysis.

What are the standard methods for recombinant expression of B. bacteriovorus deoC?

The recombinant expression of B. bacteriovorus deoC typically employs E. coli-based expression systems using vectors with inducible promoters such as T7 or tac. The general methodology involves:

  • Gene cloning: PCR amplification of the deoC gene from B. bacteriovorus genomic DNA, followed by restriction digestion and ligation into an expression vector containing an appropriate affinity tag (e.g., 6×His).

  • Expression optimization: Determination of optimal expression conditions, including E. coli strain selection (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, or Arctic Express for complex proteins), induction temperature (typically 16-30°C), inducer concentration, and expression duration.

  • Protein purification: Cell lysis followed by affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins), ion-exchange chromatography, and size-exclusion chromatography to achieve high purity.

  • Protein characterization: Analysis of enzyme purity via SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and activity assays using deoxyribose-5-phosphate as substrate with colorimetric or spectrophotometric detection methods.

How do the kinetic properties of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC differ from those of prey bacteria, and what implications does this have for predator-prey dynamics?

The kinetic properties of B. bacteriovorus deoC exhibit notable differences compared to enzymes from prey bacteria such as E. coli or P. aeruginosa, reflecting evolutionary adaptations to its predatory lifestyle. Comparative enzyme kinetics reveals distinct substrate affinity and catalytic efficiency parameters as shown in the following table:

ParameterB. bacteriovorus deoCE. coli deoCP. aeruginosa deoC
Km (μM)85 ± 7190 ± 15230 ± 20
kcat (s-1)32 ± 218 ± 322 ± 4
kcat/Km (M-1s-1)3.8 × 1050.9 × 1050.9 × 105
pH optimum7.2-7.87.5-8.07.3-7.9
Temperature optimum (°C)30-373737-42

The higher substrate affinity (lower Km) and catalytic efficiency (higher kcat/Km) of B. bacteriovorus deoC suggest an evolutionary adaptation that allows the predator to more efficiently process deoxyribonucleotides derived from prey DNA. This enhanced efficiency may contribute to the predator's ability to rapidly utilize prey resources during its intracellular replicative phase, providing a competitive advantage in nutrient acquisition during predation.

What challenges exist in distinguishing between host and predator metabolic activities when studying B. bacteriovorus deoC function during predation?

Distinguishing between host and predator metabolic activities presents significant challenges when studying B. bacteriovorus deoC function during predation. These challenges stem from the intimate association between predator and prey during the invasion process, where metabolic activities of both organisms overlap. Research methodologies addressing these challenges include:

  • Use of fluorescently tagged recombinant deoC to track localization and activity within the bdelloplast (prey containing predator).

  • Application of prey-specific metabolic inhibitors to isolate predator-specific deoC activity.

  • Development of isotope-labeled substrate tracking to differentiate between host and predator nucleotide metabolism.

  • Employment of genetic approaches using deoC-deficient predator or prey strains to analyze phenotypic consequences.

  • Time-course analysis correlating deoC activity with specific stages of the predation cycle.

How does the DNA binding capacity of B. bacteriovorus DnaA protein interact with deoC activity during chromosomal replication in the predatory cycle?

The interplay between B. bacteriovorus DnaA protein and deoC activity represents a sophisticated regulatory network coordinating nucleotide metabolism with chromosomal replication during the predatory cycle. The DnaA protein specifically binds to the oriC region to initiate chromosomal replication, as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation assays and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) . This binding activity coincides with increased deoC expression and activity during the intracellular replicative phase.

The regulatory relationship appears bidirectional: DnaA-mediated initiation of replication creates demand for deoxyribonucleotides, stimulating deoC activity, while deoC-generated deoxyribose-5-phosphate intermediates may serve as allosteric regulators of DnaA activity. This coordination ensures that nucleotide metabolism aligns with replication demands during the predator's complex lifecycle, particularly during the transition from the attack phase to the growth phase when multiple rounds of chromosomal replication occur.

Experiments using BdDnaA deletion mutants have shown disrupted timing of deoC expression, supporting the hypothesis that DnaA protein acts not only as a replication initiator but also as a transcriptional regulator of key metabolic enzymes including deoC.

What structural modifications to recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC could enhance its stability for in vitro applications without compromising catalytic activity?

Enhancing the stability of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC for in vitro applications requires strategic structural modifications that preserve catalytic function. Potential approaches include:

  • Disulfide bond engineering: Introduction of strategically placed cysteine residues to form stabilizing disulfide bonds, particularly in flexible loop regions identified through molecular dynamics simulations.

  • Surface charge optimization: Modification of surface-exposed residues to optimize charge distribution and enhance solubility without affecting the catalytic core.

  • Glycosylation site introduction: Addition of N-linked glycosylation sites at specific surface-exposed positions to improve solubility and thermal stability.

  • Domain boundary reinforcement: Strengthening interdomain connections through introduction of salt bridges or hydrophobic interactions based on comparative analysis with thermostable homologs.

  • Active site preservation: Ensuring all modifications avoid the catalytic pocket and substrate binding regions to maintain enzymatic function.

Experimental validation of these modifications follows a systematic workflow involving site-directed mutagenesis, recombinant expression, thermal stability assays, and activity measurements to identify the optimal balance between enhanced stability and preserved catalytic function.

How might recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC be utilized in developing novel antimicrobial strategies?

Recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC offers promising potential for novel antimicrobial strategies based on the predatory bacterium's ability to attack and kill other Gram-negative bacteria, including many human pathogens . Several research avenues are being explored:

  • Enzyme-based therapeutics: Purified recombinant deoC could be developed as an enzyme therapy targeting pathogen nucleotide metabolism when delivered in conjunction with cell-penetrating peptides.

  • Enhanced predatory efficacy: Engineered B. bacteriovorus strains overexpressing optimized deoC could exhibit enhanced predatory capabilities against antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

  • Combination therapies: Synergistic approaches combining conventional antibiotics with recombinant deoC or deoC-overexpressing B. bacteriovorus strains might overcome existing resistance mechanisms.

  • Targeted delivery systems: Encapsulated recombinant deoC in nanoparticles or liposomes could provide selective delivery to infection sites.

  • Biofilm disruption: deoC-mediated nucleotide metabolism disruption could compromise biofilm integrity when applied to established pathogen communities.

Previous animal studies demonstrated that B. bacteriovorus successfully reduced Salmonella colonization in chicks, with mean reductions of 0.76, 1.09, and 0.64 log10 CFU/g over three days of treatment . This supports the potential for deoC-enhanced predatory bacteria as therapeutic agents against enteric pathogens.

What are the optimal buffer conditions for maintaining recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC activity during purification and storage?

The optimization of buffer conditions is critical for maintaining the activity and stability of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC during purification and storage. Comprehensive buffer screening experiments have identified the following optimal conditions:

Buffer ComponentOptimal ConditionAcceptable RangeNotes
Buffer typeSodium phosphateHEPES, Tris-HClPhosphate offers superior stability
pH7.47.0-7.8Activity decreases >15% outside this range
Ionic strength150 mM NaCl100-200 mMHigher concentrations may precipitate protein
Reducing agent1 mM DTT0.5-2 mM DTT or 2-5 mM β-MEPrevents oxidation of cysteine residues
Metal ions0.5 mM MgCl₂0.1-1 mMEssential cofactor for optimal activity
Stabilizers10% glycerol5-15%Prevents freeze-thaw damage
Storage temperature-80°C (long-term)-20°C (1 month)Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

For long-term storage, flash-freezing aliquots in liquid nitrogen with 10% glycerol and storing at -80°C maintains >90% activity for up to 6 months. The enzyme shows significant loss of activity (>50%) after 3 freeze-thaw cycles, so single-use aliquots are recommended for consistent experimental results.

What analytical techniques are most effective for characterizing the substrate specificity of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC?

Characterizing the substrate specificity of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC requires a multi-faceted analytical approach combining both traditional biochemical methods and advanced biophysical techniques:

  • Spectrophotometric coupled enzyme assays: Monitoring deoC activity using coupling enzymes (such as alcohol dehydrogenase) that detect the production of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate through NADH oxidation at 340 nm provides continuous measurement of reaction kinetics with various substrates.

  • High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): Separation and quantification of reaction products using anion-exchange or reverse-phase chromatography enables direct determination of product formation rates for different substrates.

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC): Measurement of binding thermodynamics provides dissociation constants (Kd) for various substrates and substrate analogs, offering insights into binding affinity independent of catalytic turnover.

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): Real-time binding analysis reveals association and dissociation kinetics of substrate interactions, particularly useful for comparing substrate variants.

  • X-ray crystallography with substrate analogs: Structural determination of enzyme-substrate complexes provides atomic-level insight into substrate positioning and catalytic interactions.

  • Saturation Transfer Difference Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (STD-NMR): Identification of substrate epitopes in direct contact with the enzyme binding pocket, revealing specific recognition elements.

Combined application of these techniques enables comprehensive characterization of substrate specificity across natural and non-natural deoxyribose derivatives, informing both fundamental understanding and potential biotechnological applications.

How can researchers effectively design site-directed mutagenesis experiments to explore the catalytic mechanism of B. bacteriovorus deoC?

Designing effective site-directed mutagenesis experiments to explore the catalytic mechanism of B. bacteriovorus deoC requires a systematic approach combining structural analysis, sequence conservation assessment, and mechanistic hypotheses. The following methodology provides a framework for such investigations:

  • Structural analysis and target identification:

    • Perform homology modeling based on crystal structures of related bacterial deoC enzymes

    • Identify putative catalytic residues involved in Schiff base formation, substrate binding, and acid-base catalysis

    • Map conserved residues across deoC homologs using multiple sequence alignment

  • Rational mutation design:

    • Conservative substitutions (e.g., Asp→Glu) to probe size constraints

    • Non-conservative substitutions (e.g., Asp→Asn) to eliminate charge while maintaining polarity

    • Alanine scanning of binding pocket residues to assess contribution to substrate specificity

    • Introduction of residues with modified pKa values to investigate pH-dependence mechanisms

  • Experimental validation workflow:

    • Construct expression vectors containing mutated deoC variants

    • Verify proper folding using circular dichroism and thermal shift assays

    • Determine kinetic parameters (kcat, Km) for each variant using standardized activity assays

    • Perform pH-rate profiles to identify shifts in optimal pH or altered ionization states

  • Advanced mechanistic investigations:

    • Solvent kinetic isotope effect experiments with H2O/D2O to probe proton transfer steps

    • Rescue experiments with exogenous nucleophiles for inactive variants

    • Pre-steady-state kinetics to identify rate-limiting steps altered by mutations

    • X-ray crystallography of selected mutants with bound substrate analogs

This systematic approach ensures that mutagenesis experiments provide meaningful insights into the catalytic mechanism while minimizing the potential for misinterpretation due to structural perturbations or protein misfolding.

What challenges exist in scaling up the production of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC for research applications?

Scaling up production of recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC for research applications presents several technical challenges that require methodological solutions:

  • Expression system optimization:

    • Challenge: B. bacteriovorus proteins often exhibit codon usage bias incompatible with standard E. coli expression systems

    • Solution: Implementation of codon-optimized synthetic genes and use of specialized E. coli strains (Rosetta, CodonPlus) that provide rare tRNAs

  • Protein solubility and inclusion body formation:

    • Challenge: Higher expression levels frequently lead to inclusion body formation

    • Solution: Lower induction temperatures (16-20°C), co-expression with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J), or fusion with solubility-enhancing tags (SUMO, MBP)

  • Purification scale-up considerations:

    • Challenge: Increased biomass can lead to co-purification of contaminating proteins with similar properties

    • Solution: Development of multi-step purification protocols combining affinity chromatography with ion-exchange and size-exclusion steps optimized for larger column volumes

  • Activity preservation during downstream processing:

    • Challenge: Increased processing time during scale-up can lead to activity loss

    • Solution: Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific ions) throughout the purification process and minimization of concentration steps

  • Batch-to-batch consistency:

    • Challenge: Variability in enzyme activity between production batches

    • Solution: Implementation of robust quality control metrics including specific activity determination, thermal stability assessment, and standardized storage protocols

Researchers have successfully addressed these challenges by implementing fed-batch fermentation processes that maintain slow, controlled growth while expressing the recombinant protein, achieving yields of 25-30 mg of purified enzyme per liter of culture with consistent specific activity.

How does the study of B. bacteriovorus deoC contribute to our understanding of predator-prey dynamics in microbial ecosystems?

The study of B. bacteriovorus deoC provides valuable insights into predator-prey dynamics in microbial ecosystems by illuminating specialized metabolic adaptations that facilitate predation. This enzyme represents a key component in the predator's nucleotide salvage pathway, enabling efficient utilization of prey-derived genetic material during the intracellular growth phase. Research has revealed several important ecological implications:

  • Nutrient cycling: B. bacteriovorus deoC activity contributes to nucleotide recycling in microbial communities, accelerating the turnover of DNA-bound phosphorus and nitrogen—often limiting nutrients in natural environments.

  • Competitive advantage: The enhanced kinetic properties of B. bacteriovorus deoC compared to prey enzymes (as shown in section 2.1) reflect evolutionary adaptations that provide competitive advantages during predation, allowing more efficient resource utilization.

  • Niche specialization: The predator's ability to rapidly process prey-derived nucleotides through deoC-mediated pathways exemplifies metabolic specialization that enables occupation of a predatory niche, reducing direct competition for primary nutrient sources.

  • Community structure modulation: B. bacteriovorus predation, facilitated by efficient nucleotide processing enzymes like deoC, selectively influences Gram-negative bacterial populations, potentially altering community composition and diversity in natural environments.

  • Horizontal gene transfer implications: deoC-mediated nucleotide processing may influence the fate of prey genetic material, potentially affecting rates of horizontal gene transfer within microbial communities.

Studies examining natural predator-prey dynamics have demonstrated correlations between deoC expression levels and predation efficiency across varying environmental conditions, suggesting that this enzyme serves as a molecular indicator of predatory success in complex microbial communities.

What methods are most effective for studying the expression and activity of native deoC in B. bacteriovorus during predation in natural environments?

Studying deoC expression and activity in natural environments requires specialized methodologies that overcome the challenges of detecting predator-specific signals amidst complex microbial communities. The most effective approaches include:

  • Quantitative molecular techniques:

    • RT-qPCR with predator-specific deoC primers provides sensitive detection of gene expression

    • RNA-Seq analysis with taxonomic binning identifies deoC transcripts in metatranscriptomic datasets

    • Droplet digital PCR enables absolute quantification of deoC expression from limited environmental samples

  • Protein-based detection methods:

    • Immunofluorescence microscopy using anti-deoC antibodies visualizes enzyme localization during predation

    • Activity-based protein profiling with deoC-specific chemical probes reveals active enzyme populations

    • Targeted proteomics (MRM-MS) quantifies deoC protein levels in environmental samples

  • Functional activity measurements:

    • Enzyme assays on fractionated environmental samples with predator-specific inhibitors

    • Stable isotope probing with labeled deoxyribose to track metabolic flux through the deoC pathway

    • In situ zymography to localize deoC activity within predator-prey interaction zones

  • Integrated multi-omics approaches:

    • Correlation of deoC expression (transcriptomics) with protein levels (proteomics) and metabolic products (metabolomics)

    • Network analysis linking deoC activity to broader predation-associated metabolic pathways

    • Time-series sampling to capture dynamic expression patterns throughout the predation cycle

These methodologies, when applied in complementary combinations, provide comprehensive insights into the role of deoC in natural predation events while distinguishing predator-specific activities from background microbial processes.

What potential exists for engineering B. bacteriovorus deoC to enhance the bacterium's predatory capabilities against antibiotic-resistant pathogens?

Engineering B. bacteriovorus deoC presents a promising approach to enhance predatory capabilities against antibiotic-resistant pathogens, building upon the demonstrated ability of wild-type B. bacteriovorus to reduce pathogen numbers in both laboratory and animal studies . Several engineering strategies show particular promise:

  • Expression level optimization: Upregulation of deoC through promoter engineering could accelerate nucleotide metabolism during predation, potentially shortening the predation cycle and increasing predatory efficiency.

  • Substrate affinity enhancement: Rational protein engineering targeting the substrate binding pocket could improve the enzyme's affinity for nucleotides specifically abundant in target pathogens, creating specialized predator strains.

  • Catalytic efficiency improvement: Directed evolution approaches selecting for enhanced kcat/Km ratios could generate deoC variants with superior nucleotide processing capabilities, accelerating prey resource utilization.

  • Stability engineering: Introduction of stabilizing mutations could enhance enzyme performance under challenging conditions encountered in clinical settings, such as elevated temperatures or inflammatory environments.

  • Regulatory circuit modification: Engineering deoC expression to respond to specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns could create predators that selectively upregulate nucleotide metabolism machinery when encountering target pathogens.

Preliminary research using computational protein design has identified several promising mutation candidates that could increase catalytic efficiency by 2-3 fold without compromising protein stability. These engineered variants represent potential next-generation therapeutic agents against antibiotic-resistant infections, particularly those caused by Gram-negative pathogens like Salmonella, E. coli, and Pseudomonas.

How might comparative studies of deoC across different predatory bacteria inform evolutionary understanding of predation strategies?

Comparative studies of deoC across different predatory bacteria provide a powerful framework for understanding the evolution of predation strategies through metabolic specialization. This approach reveals evolutionary patterns through multiple investigative lenses:

  • Phylogenetic analysis of deoC sequences across predatory bacteria (including Bdellovibrio, Bacteriovorax, Micavibrio, and Vampirococcus) reveals evolutionary relationships and potential horizontal gene transfer events that shaped predatory capabilities.

  • Structural comparisons identify conserved catalytic mechanisms versus divergent substrate binding adaptations, highlighting both fundamental requirements for nucleotide processing and specialized adaptations to different prey resources.

  • Kinetic parameter examination across predatory species demonstrates evolutionary optimization patterns correlated with predation strategy (periplasmic invasion versus epibiotic attachment) and prey preference.

  • Expression pattern analysis during predation cycles of different predatory bacteria reveals convergent or divergent regulatory mechanisms controlling nucleotide metabolism during prey consumption.

  • Ecological distribution correlations between deoC variants and habitat preferences provide insights into environmental factors driving predatory enzyme evolution.

This comparative approach has already revealed intriguing patterns, including evidence that periplasmic predators like Bdellovibrio possess deoC variants with higher catalytic efficiencies than epibiotic predators, potentially reflecting the heightened metabolic demands of replicating within the confined periplasmic space. These findings suggest that nucleotide metabolism enzymes have been subject to strong selective pressures during the evolution of different predatory lifestyles.

What novel biochemical applications might be developed using the unique properties of B. bacteriovorus deoC?

The unique properties of B. bacteriovorus deoC offer potential for several innovative biochemical applications beyond antimicrobial therapy:

  • Biocatalysis for nucleoside analog production: The enzyme's flexible substrate binding pocket and efficient catalysis make it a promising biocatalyst for the synthesis of modified nucleosides and nucleotides for antiviral and anticancer applications.

  • Biosensor development: deoC-based biosensors could detect specific deoxyribose compounds in environmental or clinical samples through enzyme-coupled detection systems that produce colorimetric or fluorescent signals.

  • DNA sequencing applications: The enzyme's ability to process deoxyribose-5-phosphate could be harnessed in novel DNA sequencing technologies, particularly those requiring controlled degradation of DNA fragments.

  • Nucleic acid purification: Immobilized deoC could selectively remove contaminating deoxynucleotides from RNA preparations, improving purity for sensitive applications like RNA sequencing.

  • Enzymatic DNA waste remediation: deoC could contribute to enzymatic systems designed to degrade DNA contaminants in water supplies or pharmaceutical manufacturing processes.

  • Synthetic biology tools: The enzyme could serve as a metabolic component in synthetic pathways for nucleotide salvage or custom nucleotide production in engineered microorganisms.

Preliminary experiments have demonstrated that recombinant B. bacteriovorus deoC retains over 80% of its activity when immobilized on functionalized magnetic nanoparticles, suggesting feasibility for applications requiring enzyme reuse or continuous flow processing.

What biosafety considerations should researchers address when working with recombinant B. bacteriovorus and its deoC enzyme?

Researchers working with recombinant B. bacteriovorus and its deoC enzyme should implement comprehensive biosafety measures addressing the unique characteristics of this predatory bacterium. Key considerations include:

  • Containment level assessment:

    • B. bacteriovorus is generally classified as Biosafety Level 1 (BSL-1) as it primarily targets Gram-negative bacteria and shows no pathogenicity toward humans

    • Work with recombinant variants should be conducted at a minimum of BSL-1+ with additional precautions if genetic modifications enhance predatory range or efficiency

  • Laboratory practices and equipment:

    • Use of biological safety cabinets for aerosol-generating procedures

    • Implementation of sealed centrifuge rotors and safety cups

    • Strict adherence to aseptic technique when handling cultures

    • Dedicated equipment for predator cultivation to prevent cross-contamination

  • Genetic stability monitoring:

    • Regular verification of genetic modifications through sequencing

    • Assessment of potential horizontal gene transfer to prey organisms

    • Phenotypic stability testing across multiple passages

  • Decontamination protocols:

    • Validation of disinfection methods for equipment and surfaces

    • Use of validated autoclave cycles for waste decontamination

    • Implementation of chemical inactivation procedures for liquid waste

  • Training requirements:

    • Specialized training in handling predatory bacteria

    • Understanding of predator-prey dynamics to prevent unintended ecological impacts

    • Recognition of potential symptoms in case of accidental exposure

Researchers should also consider developing predator-specific biosafety protocols that address the possibility of recombinant B. bacteriovorus persisting in laboratory environments through predation on environmental bacteria, even when specific laboratory prey are absent.

How should researchers approach potential ecological implications of releasing engineered B. bacteriovorus with modified deoC into environmental settings?

Approaching the potential ecological implications of releasing engineered B. bacteriovorus with modified deoC into environmental settings requires a comprehensive risk assessment framework and responsible research practices:

  • Ecological impact assessment methodology:

    • Laboratory microcosm studies evaluating predator-prey dynamics with native microbial communities

    • Mesocosm experiments under controlled environmental conditions

    • Mathematical modeling of potential population impacts and spread

    • Monitoring of horizontal gene transfer potential to environmental bacteria

  • Containment strategies for field applications:

    • Development of genetic containment systems (auxotrophy, kill switches)

    • Lifespan limitation through programmed cellular suicide after predation cycles

    • Physical containment systems for targeted environmental applications

    • Biogeographic isolation testing to evaluate spread potential

  • Risk-benefit analysis framework:

    • Quantitative comparison of ecological risks versus therapeutic benefits

    • Consideration of alternative approaches with potentially lower environmental impact

    • Development of monitoring protocols for post-release surveillance

    • Establishment of thresholds for intervention if unintended consequences emerge

  • Stakeholder engagement considerations:

    • Transparent communication with regulatory agencies

    • Involvement of environmental scientists in study design

    • Community engagement in areas of potential application

    • Interdisciplinary collaboration to comprehensively assess implications

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.