Recombinant Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus Threonine--tRNA ligase (thrS), partial, is a synthesized form of the enzyme Threonine--tRNA ligase (thrS) derived from the bacterium Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus . Threonine--tRNA ligase, also known as threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS), is an essential enzyme that catalyzes the attachment of threonine to its corresponding tRNA(Thr) . This process is crucial for protein biosynthesis, ensuring the accurate translation of genetic information into proteins. The "partial" designation indicates that the recombinant protein represents a fragment or a specific domain of the full-length enzyme .
Threonine--tRNA ligase (EC 6.1.1.3) belongs to the ligase family, specifically those that form carbon-oxygen bonds in tRNA and related compounds . It is an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that links amino acids to their cognate transfer RNAs (tRNA) in aminoacylation reactions, establishing the connection between a specific amino acid and a nucleotide triplet anticodon embedded in the tRNA .
The reaction catalyzed by threonine-tRNA ligase is :
$$
ATP + L\text{-threonine} + tRNA(Thr) \rightleftharpoons AMP + \text{diphosphate} + L\text{-threonyl-tRNA(Thr)}
$$
This enzyme has several other names, including threonyl-tRNA synthetase, threonyl-transfer ribonucleate synthetase, and TARS .
Aminoacylation: The primary function of ThrRS is to catalyze the attachment of threonine to tRNA(Thr), forming threonyl-tRNA(Thr). This is a crucial step in protein synthesis, as it ensures that threonine is incorporated into the growing polypeptide chain at the correct positions specified by the mRNA .
Regulation of Translation: Threonyl-tRNA synthetase (TARS) can also regulate the translation of its own gene by binding to its mRNA .
Editing Mechanism: Threonyl-tRNA synthetase uses a unique zinc ion to discriminate against the isosteric valine at the activation step . It can also hydrolyze incorrectly formed ser-tRNA(Thr) at a specific site in the N-terminal domain of the enzyme .
Recombinant Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus Threonine--tRNA ligase (thrS), partial can be utilized in various research applications:
Enzyme Activity Assays: To study the catalytic activity of the enzyme and its interactions with substrates and inhibitors.
Structural Studies: To determine the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme fragment and gain insights into its mechanism of action.
Drug Discovery: To identify compounds that can inhibit or modulate the activity of the enzyme, potentially leading to the development of new antibacterial agents .
Protein Engineering: To modify the enzyme's properties, such as its stability, activity, or substrate specificity, for biotechnological applications.
KEGG: bba:Bd1617
STRING: 264462.Bd1617
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus Threonine--tRNA ligase (thrS), also known as Threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS), is a class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzyme with EC number 6.1.1.3. This essential enzyme catalyzes the attachment of threonine to its cognate tRNA (tRNA^Thr) through a two-step aminoacylation reaction necessary for protein synthesis. The enzyme first binds threonine and ATP to form threonyl adenylate (Thr-AMP) with the release of pyrophosphate, then transfers the threonine moiety to the 3'OH site of tRNA^Thr . The enzyme is homodimeric, with a molecular weight of approximately 150 kDa in bacteria . In B. bacteriovorus HD100, this enzyme plays a critical role in the predator's unique lifecycle, supporting protein synthesis during both the free-living attack phase and the intraperiplasmic growth phase within prey bacteria .
While the core catalytic mechanism remains conserved across species, B. bacteriovorus thrS contains structural adaptations that reflect the specialized metabolism of this predatory bacterium. The enzyme maintains the characteristic class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase architecture, with N-terminal domains and a catalytic core, but may feature specific adaptations related to the predatory lifestyle . These differences potentially influence substrate recognition, catalytic efficiency, and regulation during the transition between predatory phases.
Key structural distinctions include:
| Feature | B. bacteriovorus thrS | E. coli thrS |
|---|---|---|
| N-terminal domain organization | TGS-fold in N1 domain (residues 1-62) | Similar fold but different residue composition |
| Catalytic domain | Contains conserved class II motifs | Contains conserved class II motifs |
| Oligomeric state | Homodimer | Homodimer |
| Regulatory elements | May contain predator-specific regulatory regions | Contains bacterial regulatory elements |
These structural differences may contribute to the enzyme's function during the predatory lifecycle, particularly during the transition from attack phase to growth phase inside prey bacteria .
Optimal storage and handling conditions for recombinant B. bacteriovorus thrS depend on preparation format and research requirements:
Storage conditions:
Liquid formulations: Store at -20°C to -80°C with a typical shelf life of 6 months
Lyophilized formulations: Store at -20°C to -80°C with an extended shelf life of 12 months
Reconstitution protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (50% is commonly recommended) for long-term storage
Important handling considerations:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can compromise enzyme activity
For experimental work, maintain the enzyme at appropriate temperature (typically 4°C) during assay preparation
Consider buffer composition for specific applications, especially regarding divalent metal ion requirements for activity
Two primary expression systems have been validated for producing recombinant B. bacteriovorus thrS:
E. coli expression system:
Most commonly used for bacterial protein expression
Yields functional recombinant protein with >85% purity (SDS-PAGE)
Suitable for structural studies and biochemical characterization
Expression typically employs T7-based expression vectors
Requires optimization of induction conditions and purification strategies
Yeast expression system:
Alternative system reported for expression of B. bacteriovorus proteins
May provide different post-translational modifications
Reported to produce functional protein with >85% purity (SDS-PAGE)
Can be advantageous for proteins that are toxic in bacterial systems
Recent advances in B. bacteriovorus genetic engineering have expanded options for heterologous expression, including:
Development of Golden Standard (GS) cloning techniques specifically adapted for B. bacteriovorus HD100
Characterization of constitutive and inducible promoters for controlled expression
Implementation of Tn7 transposon-based chromosomal integration methods
Verification of recombinant B. bacteriovorus thrS enzymatic activity involves several complementary approaches:
ATP-PPi exchange assay:
Measure the formation of [32P]ATP from [32P]PPi and AMP in the presence of threonine
Reaction components: thrS enzyme, threonine, ATP, [32P]PPi, and appropriate buffer (typically containing Mg2+)
Quantify radiolabeled ATP formation as a measure of adenylation activity
Aminoacylation assay:
Monitor the attachment of [14C]threonine or [3H]threonine to tRNA^Thr
Reaction components: thrS enzyme, labeled threonine, ATP, purified tRNA^Thr, and buffer
Precipitate charged tRNA with TCA, filter, and quantify radioactivity
Alternatively, use a more modern thin-layer chromatography (TLC) approach to separate charged and uncharged tRNAs
Coupled spectrophotometric assay:
Monitor ATP hydrolysis during aminoacylation using coupled enzymes (pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase)
Follow NADH oxidation spectrophotometrically at 340 nm
Calculate enzyme activity based on the rate of NADH consumption
Activity validation should include appropriate controls:
Negative control: reaction mixture without threonine
Positive control: commercially available E. coli thrS (if available)
Substrate specificity control: test with non-cognate amino acids
Recombinant B. bacteriovorus thrS serves as a valuable tool for investigating predation mechanisms through several research strategies:
Lifecycle stage-specific protein synthesis:
Use thrS activity assays to measure protein synthesis capacity during different predatory lifecycle stages
Correlate thrS activity with transcriptomic data to understand translational regulation during predation
Develop thrS-based reporter constructs to visualize protein synthesis dynamics during prey invasion and consumption
Prey-predator interaction studies:
Examine how B. bacteriovorus maintains translation fidelity during different predatory phases
Investigate whether prey-derived amino acids or nucleotides directly influence thrS activity
Use thrS as a marker for predator metabolic activity when co-cultured with prey bacteria
Host-independent growth investigation:
Compare thrS expression and activity between host-dependent (HD) and host-independent (HI) B. bacteriovorus strains
Determine if alterations in thrS function contribute to the HI phenotype
Study how translation machinery adapts between predatory and saprophytic lifestyles
These applications can be facilitated through recently developed genetic tools for B. bacteriovorus, including:
Inducible expression systems like PJ^ExD/EliR
Constitutive high-expression promoters like P^BG37
B. bacteriovorus thrS may influence several aspects of the bacterium's potential as a "living antibiotic":
Predatory efficiency and metabolic activity:
thrS activity directly impacts protein synthesis rates needed for efficient predation
Optimization of thrS expression could potentially enhance predatory capabilities against pathogens
Understanding thrS regulation may reveal strategies to maintain predatory fitness in therapeutic settings
Host range determination:
Translation machinery adaptability may influence the range of bacterial prey that can be effectively utilized
thrS function could be critical when B. bacteriovorus transitions between diverse prey environments
Potential correlation between thrS activity and predation efficiency against specific pathogens
Survival in therapeutic contexts:
thrS functionality under physiological conditions (temperature, pH, serum proteins) relevant to therapeutic applications
Potential for engineering thrS variants with enhanced stability for increased predator persistence in therapeutic settings
Role in predator recovery and reproduction after completing predation cycles in vivo
Research data supporting therapeutic potential:
Developing genetic tools to study B. bacteriovorus thrS function presents several significant challenges:
Essential gene manipulation:
thrS is likely essential for predator viability, complicating knockout studies
Requires conditional expression systems or partial loss-of-function approaches
Host-independent (HI) derivatives may be needed to study genes essential for predatory growth
Limited genetic toolbox:
Despite recent advances, B. bacteriovorus genetic manipulation remains challenging
Available approaches include:
Technical challenges:
Predatory lifestyle complicates isolation and maintenance of pure cultures
Host-dependent (HD) growth requires co-culture with prey bacteria
Difficulty in selecting transformants due to obligate predatory lifestyle
Recent methodological advances that can be applied to thrS studies:
Marker-free deletion techniques using suicide plasmids containing sacB for counter-selection (pSSK10, pK18mobsacB)
The Golden Standard (GS) hierarchical assembly cloning technique adapted for B. bacteriovorus HD100
Characterized constitutive promoters (e.g., P^BG37) and inducible systems (PJ^ExD/EliR)
Structural analysis of B. bacteriovorus thrS could contribute to antimicrobial development through several approaches:
Selective inhibitor design:
Identification of structural differences between B. bacteriovorus thrS and pathogen thrS enzymes
Design of inhibitors that selectively target pathogen thrS while preserving B. bacteriovorus enzyme function
Development of combination therapies using predatory bacteria and synthetase inhibitors with complementary target spectra
Predation enhancement strategies:
Structural insights into regulatory domains that control thrS activity during predatory lifecycle
Engineering thrS variants with optimized catalytic efficiency for enhanced predator performance
Identification of structural adaptations that support protein synthesis during the transition from attack phase to growth phase
Novel antimicrobial peptide discovery:
Investigation of potential moonlighting functions of thrS fragments
Many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases harbor domains with secondary functions or give rise to bioactive peptides
Structural characterization may reveal peptide regions with direct antimicrobial activity
Structural features of interest:
Purification of recombinant B. bacteriovorus thrS can be achieved through the following optimized approach:
Expression and initial preparation:
Express with appropriate affinity tag (His-tag is commonly used)
Harvest cells and disrupt by sonication or French press
Clarify lysate by centrifugation (30,000 × g, 30 minutes, 4°C)
Filter supernatant through 0.45 μm membrane
Multi-step purification strategy:
Affinity chromatography:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin for His-tagged protein
Wash with increasing imidazole concentrations (10-50 mM)
Elute with high imidazole buffer (250-300 mM)
Ion exchange chromatography:
Apply to anion exchange column (Q Sepharose) equilibrated with low salt buffer
Elute with linear NaCl gradient (0-500 mM)
Collect and pool fractions containing thrS (monitor by SDS-PAGE and activity)
Size exclusion chromatography:
Apply concentrated sample to Superdex 200 column
Elute with buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT
Verify purity by SDS-PAGE (target >95% purity)
Quality control assessment:
Verify enzymatic activity using aminoacylation assay
Confirm identity by mass spectrometry
Assess oligomeric state by native PAGE or analytical gel filtration
Check for contaminating nucleases or proteases
Typical yield from E. coli expression systems is 2-5 mg of purified protein per liter of culture, with final purity exceeding 85% by SDS-PAGE analysis .
To investigate the role of thrS in B. bacteriovorus predation efficiency, consider the following experimental approaches:
Genetic manipulation approaches:
Conditional expression system:
Domain swapping:
Generate chimeric thrS proteins by swapping domains with thrS from non-predatory bacteria
Evaluate how domain replacements affect predation efficiency
Identify domains critical for predatory lifestyle
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Target conserved catalytic residues or predator-specific residues
Evaluate effects on aminoacylation activity and predation
Create structure-function maps of residues critical for predation
Predation assay designs:
Quantitative predation efficiency measurement:
Co-culture B. bacteriovorus strains with prey bacteria (E. coli, Pseudomonas, etc.)
Monitor prey killing via viable counts, optical density, or live/dead staining
Calculate predation efficiency as reduction in prey population over time
Microscopy-based approaches:
Use fluorescently labeled prey to visualize predation events
Implement time-lapse microscopy to track predator-prey interactions
Quantify predation parameters (attachment time, invasion time, bdelloplast formation)
Metabolic labeling:
Use amino acid analogs (e.g., BONCAT) to track protein synthesis during predation
Correlate thrS activity with protein synthesis rates at different predatory stages
Identify prey-derived vs. predator-synthesized proteins
Data analysis framework:
| Parameter | Measurement Method | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Predation efficiency | Prey viability reduction | Correlation between thrS activity and predation rate |
| Bdelloplast formation | Phase contrast/fluorescence microscopy | Dependency of successful invasion on thrS function |
| Progeny number | Direct counting of released predators | Relationship between thrS activity and reproductive capacity |
| Protein synthesis rate | Radioisotope or analog incorporation | Translation activity during predatory lifecycle |
Several complementary approaches can investigate interactions between B. bacteriovorus thrS and prey-derived molecules:
Biochemical interaction studies:
Pull-down assays:
Immobilize tagged recombinant thrS on appropriate resin
Incubate with prey cell lysates or fractions
Elute and identify interacting molecules by mass spectrometry
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilize thrS on sensor chip
Flow prey-derived fractions or candidate molecules
Measure binding kinetics and affinity constants
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC):
Directly measure thermodynamic parameters of thrS-ligand interactions
Determine binding stoichiometry and specificity
Characterize interactions with prey-derived nucleotides or metabolites
Structural approaches:
X-ray crystallography:
Crystallize thrS alone and in complex with prey-derived molecules
Solve structures to identify binding sites and conformational changes
Compare with thrS structures from non-predatory bacteria
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Monitor conformational changes in thrS upon interaction with prey molecules
Identify regions with altered solvent accessibility
Map potential allosteric regulation sites
Functional assays:
Enzymatic activity modulation:
Test thrS activity in presence of prey cell extracts or fractions
Identify inhibitory or stimulatory effects on aminoacylation
Characterize specificity of effects for B. bacteriovorus thrS vs. other synthetases
Prey-specific adaptation studies:
Compare thrS activity when B. bacteriovorus is grown on different prey species
Identify prey-specific adaptations in enzyme kinetics or substrate preference
Correlate with transcriptomic or proteomic changes during predation
Bioinformatic analyses:
Conduct comparative genomic analyses across predatory and non-predatory bacteria
Identify predator-specific sequence motifs or domains in thrS
Model potential interaction sites based on sequence conservation patterns
This multi-faceted approach can reveal whether B. bacteriovorus thrS has evolved specific adaptations for interaction with prey-derived molecules, potentially contributing to the bacterium's predatory efficiency and host range.
Recent advances in understanding B. bacteriovorus thrS function have emerged from several complementary research directions:
Regulatory mechanisms during predation cycle:
Transcriptomic studies have revealed stage-specific expression patterns of thrS during the predatory lifecycle
thrS expression appears coordinated with other translation machinery components during the transition from attack phase to growth phase
Evidence suggests specific regulatory mechanisms may control thrS activity to support the rapid protein synthesis required during prey consumption
Genomic and evolutionary insights:
Comparative genomic analyses have identified predator-specific features in thrS sequences
These adaptations may reflect optimization for the unique metabolic demands of predatory bacteria
Recent reclassification of Bdellovibrio from Deltaproteobacteria to class Oligoflexia (with proposals for a distinct phylum Bdellovibrionota) has prompted reexamination of evolutionary relationships among predatory bacteria translation machinery
Technological developments:
New genetic tools specifically adapted for B. bacteriovorus manipulation have enabled more sophisticated studies
The Golden Standard (GS) hierarchical assembly cloning technique has been adapted for B. bacteriovorus HD100
Characterization of constitutive (P^BG37) and inducible (PJ^ExD/EliR) promoters now allows controlled gene expression
Tn7 transposon-based chromosomal integration systems provide stable genetic modification options
These advances provide a foundation for future studies exploring the specific roles of thrS in supporting B. bacteriovorus' predatory lifestyle and potential therapeutic applications.
The function of thrS in B. bacteriovorus likely shows significant differences between host-dependent (HD) and host-independent (HI) growth modes:
Differential expression patterns:
In HD mode, thrS expression must coordinate with predatory lifecycle stages
In HI mode, expression likely follows patterns more similar to conventional bacteria
Transcriptomic studies suggest different regulatory networks govern translation machinery in these distinct growth modes
Functional adaptations:
HD growth requires rapid protein synthesis during the bdelloplast stage to support filamentous growth and progeny formation
HI growth may involve more conventional translation regulation responsive to nutrient availability
Different sets of genes are essential for HD versus HI growth, suggesting potential functional divergence in core processes including translation
Metabolic context differences:
| Aspect | Host-Dependent (HD) Mode | Host-Independent (HI) Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Amino acid source | Primarily prey-derived | Environmental/media-derived |
| Translation timing | Cyclic (attack vs. growth phase) | More constant during growth |
| Energy availability | Abundant during prey consumption | Limited by environmental conditions |
| Growth pattern | Filamentous growth within bdelloplast | Conventional bacterial growth |
Experimental evidence and research directions:
HI strains have been instrumental in studying B. bacteriovorus genetics by enabling cultivation without prey
Transposon mutagenesis in HI isolates has helped identify genes essential for different growth modes
Comparative studies of thrS activity between HD and HI strains could reveal adaptation mechanisms
Engineering thrS variants optimized for either growth mode might enhance research applications
Understanding these differences has practical implications for both fundamental research and potential applications of B. bacteriovorus as a biocontrol agent or living antibiotic.
Several promising research directions involving B. bacteriovorus thrS warrant further investigation:
Structural biology and drug development:
High-resolution structural characterization of B. bacteriovorus thrS
Comparative structural analyses with pathogen thrS enzymes
Structure-guided design of selective inhibitors targeting pathogen synthetases while sparing predator enzymes
Exploration of potential moonlighting functions or bioactive peptides derived from thrS
Synthetic biology applications:
Engineering B. bacteriovorus strains with enhanced thrS activity for improved predation efficiency
Development of biosensors using thrS-based reporters to monitor predator activity in complex environments
Creation of predator strains with expanded prey range through synthetase modifications
Design of genetic circuits controlling thrS expression to modulate predator behavior
Therapeutic development:
Investigation of thrS role in predator survival within mammalian hosts
Optimization of thrS function for enhanced predator persistence in therapeutic contexts
Study of potential immunomodulatory effects of B. bacteriovorus proteins including thrS
Development of combination therapies pairing predatory bacteria with conventional antibiotics
Fundamental biological questions:
Elucidation of translation regulation mechanisms during predatory lifecycle transitions
Investigation of potential horizontal gene transfer between predator and prey affecting translation machinery
Understanding how thrS activity is coordinated with other cellular processes during predation
Exploration of the evolutionary history of thrS in predatory bacteria
Emerging methodologies enabling these directions:
Cryo-electron microscopy for high-resolution structural studies
Single-cell RNA-seq to capture transcriptional dynamics during predation
Advanced genetic tools specifically optimized for B. bacteriovorus
In vivo imaging techniques to track predator activity in complex environments
These research directions could significantly advance both fundamental understanding of predatory bacteria and their practical applications in biotechnology and medicine.