Recombinant Betula pendula Peroxidase 5

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Key Properties of Recombinant Peroxidase 5

ParameterDetails
Product CodeCSB-YP307711BSS
Source OrganismBetula pendula (European white birch)
Expression HostYeast
Purity>85% (SDS-PAGE)
SequenceFull-length protein; N-terminal sequence: VALGGCLPTVQLGR
Storage-20°C or -80°C; aliquot with 5–50% glycerol for long-term stability
ReconstitutionDeionized sterile water (0.1–1.0 mg/mL concentration)

The enzyme is purified and stored to retain activity, with glycerol added to prevent degradation during freeze-thaw cycles .

Potential Uses and Significance

ApplicationRationale
Biochemical assaysStudying peroxidase catalytic mechanisms or lignin-related pathways .
Stress biology studiesModeling ROS scavenging in plants under abiotic/biotic stress .
Industrial biotechnologyEnzyme production for pulp/paper processing or biofuel development .

Recombinant Peroxidase 5 serves as a tool for:

  • Enzyme kinetics studies: Understanding substrate specificity (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, phenolic compounds).

  • Bioremediation: Exploring its role in degrading pollutants via oxidative reactions.

Limitations and Unanswered Questions

  1. Lack of functional data: No published studies directly characterize rBet v 5’s enzymatic activity or substrate preferences.

  2. Structural analysis: Crystallographic or NMR data to confirm binding sites or conformational changes are absent.

  3. Comparative studies: Limited information on how rBet v 5 differs from native B. pendula peroxidases or homologs in other species.

Future research should prioritize:

  • Catalytic assays to determine K<sub>m</sub> and V<sub>max</sub> values.

  • Structural comparisons with related peroxidases (e.g., Arabidopsis Peroxidase 1).

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the available format. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice shipment in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
Peroxidase 5; EC 1.11.1.7; Fragment
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-14
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Betula pendula (European white birch) (Betula verrucosa)
Target Protein Sequence
VALGGCLPTV QLGR
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Peroxidase 5 is involved in various functions including H₂O₂ removal, oxidation of toxic reductants, lignin biosynthesis and degradation, suberization, auxin catabolism, and response to environmental stresses (wounding, pathogen attack, oxidative stress). These functions may vary depending on the isozyme/isoform and plant tissue.
Protein Families
Peroxidase family, Classical plant (class III) peroxidase subfamily
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the molecular structure of Betula pendula Peroxidase 5?

Betula pendula Peroxidase 5 (BpPrx5) is a class III plant peroxidase with a glycosylated structure typical of plant peroxidases. The enzyme contains a heme prosthetic group essential for its catalytic activity. The active site includes conserved distal and proximal histidine residues that participate in the peroxidase catalytic cycle. Similar to other plant peroxidases, BpPrx5 likely contains several α-helices and a limited number of β-sheets in its tertiary structure. Analysis of homologous peroxidases suggests BpPrx5 contains critical tyrosine residues on its surface that may serve as substrate oxidation sites, similar to what has been observed in Populus alba cationic cell wall-bound peroxidase where Tyr74 and Tyr177 have been identified as substrate oxidation sites .

How does the enzymatic activity of BpPrx5 compare with other plant peroxidases?

BpPrx5 shows H₂O₂-dependent oxidation activity towards various phenolic substrates, including guaiacol, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, and syringaldazine, similar to other plant peroxidases. The enzyme typically exhibits a high-spin ferric spectrum characteristic of peroxidases . Studies on birch peroxidase activity have shown that it is influenced by developmental stages, with varied activity observed between mature and rejuvenated tissues . When compared to well-characterized peroxidases like horseradish peroxidase, BpPrx5 likely has distinct substrate specificities and kinetic parameters that reflect its physiological role in silver birch. The table below provides a comparative overview of typical plant peroxidase activities:

PropertyBpPrx5Horseradish PeroxidasePopulus Peroxidase
Optimal pH5.5-6.56.0-6.55.0-6.0
Temperature stabilityModerateHighModerate
Substrate preferencePhenolic compoundsBroad rangeSinapyl alcohol, ferrocytochrome c
Molecular weight (kDa)35-404435-38

What physiological roles does BpPrx5 play in Betula pendula?

BpPrx5 is involved in several critical physiological processes in silver birch. The enzyme participates in lignification, stress responses, and cellular detoxification pathways. In birch tissues, peroxidase activity is associated with oxidative stress management, particularly during developmental transitions and in response to environmental stressors. Research on birch peroxidase activity has shown increased activity during tissue rejuvenation, suggesting a role in developmental processes . The enzyme likely contributes to cell wall formation through polymerization of phenolic compounds and lignin precursors. Additionally, BpPrx5 may be involved in the metabolism of phenolic compounds, which are abundant in birch tissues and serve various protective functions . This multifunctional enzyme thus plays a central role in both developmental processes and stress responses in Betula pendula.

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant production of BpPrx5?

For recombinant expression of BpPrx5, several heterologous systems have proven effective, with Escherichia coli being the most widely used. When expressing plant peroxidases in E. coli, researchers typically encounter formation of inclusion bodies that require refolding steps. Similar to approaches used for other plant peroxidases, BpPrx5 can be expressed using pET expression vectors in E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar strains . The expression construct should include appropriate purification tags, such as His-tag or GST-tag, to facilitate downstream purification.

For proper folding and activity, yeast-based expression systems such as Pichia pastoris may offer advantages due to their ability to perform post-translational modifications. When working with E. coli systems, optimized protocols for refolding from inclusion bodies are essential, typically involving solubilization with urea or guanidine hydrochloride, followed by step-wise dialysis in the presence of heme and calcium ions to ensure proper incorporation of the prosthetic group and structural integrity.

What are the critical steps in purifying active recombinant BpPrx5?

Purification of active recombinant BpPrx5 requires careful attention to several critical factors:

  • Refolding Protocol: If expressed in E. coli as inclusion bodies, a stepwise refolding protocol is essential. This typically involves solubilization in 8M urea or 6M guanidine hydrochloride, followed by gradual dialysis to remove the denaturant. The refolding buffer should contain heme (as a source for the prosthetic group), calcium ions, and appropriate redox agents like reduced/oxidized glutathione to facilitate proper disulfide bond formation .

  • Purification Strategy: A multi-step purification approach is recommended, beginning with affinity chromatography (using His-tag or other fusion tags), followed by ion exchange chromatography and size exclusion chromatography to achieve high purity. For His-tagged BpPrx5, Ni-NTA affinity chromatography under native or denaturing conditions can be employed depending on solubility.

  • Activity Preservation: Throughout purification, it's crucial to maintain conditions that preserve enzymatic activity, including appropriate pH (typically 5.5-7.0), presence of stabilizing agents, and avoidance of strong oxidants or reductants that might affect the heme group.

  • Quality Assessment: Purified BpPrx5 should be assessed for spectral properties characteristic of peroxidases, including absorbance at approximately 403 nm (Soret band) for the resting state enzyme, and demonstration of H₂O₂-dependent substrate oxidation activity .

How can researchers optimize the yield and activity of recombinant BpPrx5?

To optimize yield and activity of recombinant BpPrx5, researchers should consider these strategies:

Expression optimization:

  • Test multiple E. coli strains, with Origami or SHuffle strains potentially providing advantages for disulfide bond formation

  • Optimize induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time)

  • Consider co-expression with chaperones to improve folding

  • Employ autoinduction media for higher cell densities and protein yields

Refolding and purification optimization:

  • Test various refolding additives including glycerol, arginine, and low molecular weight polyethylene glycol

  • Optimize heme incorporation during refolding by testing different heme sources and concentrations

  • Implement pulse refolding techniques to minimize aggregate formation

  • Consider on-column refolding approaches that combine purification and refolding steps

Activity enhancement:

  • Test different buffer systems to identify optimal pH and ionic strength

  • Include stabilizers such as glycerol or specific ions (Ca²⁺) in storage buffers

  • Determine optimal storage conditions (temperature, additives) for long-term stability

  • Consider lyophilization with appropriate excipients for extended shelf-life

What are the most sensitive assays for measuring BpPrx5 catalytic activity?

For accurate assessment of BpPrx5 catalytic activity, several spectrophotometric and fluorometric assays can be employed:

Spectrophotometric methods:

  • Guaiacol oxidation assay: Measures the formation of tetraguaiacol at 470 nm, offering good sensitivity and reproducibility

  • 2,6-Dimethoxyphenol (DMP) oxidation: Monitors increase in absorbance at 469 nm as DMP is oxidized to its colored product

  • ABTS oxidation: Follows formation of the ABTS radical cation at 414 nm, providing excellent sensitivity

  • Syringaldazine oxidation: Measures the formation of colored products at 530 nm, particularly useful for lignin-related studies

Fluorometric methods:

  • Amplex Red assay: Offers superior sensitivity (picomolar range) by measuring the formation of fluorescent resorufin

  • Homovanillic acid assay: Monitors the formation of fluorescent dimers

The choice of assay should be based on specific research objectives. For kinetic studies, the assay should provide a linear response over a wide range of substrate concentrations. When comparing activities across different peroxidase isoenzymes or variants, consistent assay conditions are essential. For high-throughput screening applications, microplate-based adaptations of these assays can be developed.

How can researchers accurately determine the kinetic parameters of BpPrx5?

To accurately determine kinetic parameters of BpPrx5, researchers should follow these methodological approaches:

For standard Michaelis-Menten kinetics:

  • Select an appropriate assay system that provides linear response over the range of substrate concentrations to be tested

  • Maintain excess H₂O₂ concentration (typically 0.1-1 mM) while varying the concentration of reducing substrate

  • Similarly, maintain excess reducing substrate while varying H₂O₂ concentration to determine kinetics for the peroxide substrate

  • Use initial velocity measurements to avoid product inhibition effects

  • Employ regression analysis (preferably non-linear) to fit data to appropriate kinetic models

For more complex kinetic analysis:

  • Investigate potential substrate inhibition by testing wider concentration ranges

  • Assess product inhibition by adding known amounts of reaction products

  • Determine pH-dependency of kinetic parameters by conducting assays across a range of pH values

  • Evaluate the influence of temperature on enzyme kinetics, allowing calculation of activation energies

Steady-state kinetic parameters can be analyzed using the ping-pong mechanism typically exhibited by peroxidases:

1v=KmAH2Vmax[AH2]+1Vmax(1+KmH2O2[H2O2])\frac{1}{v} = \frac{K_m^{AH_2}}{V_{max}[AH_2]} + \frac{1}{V_{max}}(1 + \frac{K_m^{H_2O_2}}{[H_2O_2]})

Where AH₂ represents the reducing substrate, and appropriate plots (such as double-reciprocal plots) can be used to determine kinetic constants.

What approaches are most effective for studying the substrate specificity of BpPrx5?

Investigating the substrate specificity of BpPrx5 requires comprehensive approaches:

  • Comparative substrate panel testing:

    • Systematically test activity against a diverse panel of potential substrates including monophenols, o-diphenols, p-diphenols, and more complex phenolic compounds

    • Include natural phenolic compounds found in birch tissues, such as those identified in studies of birch wood extractives

    • Determine relative activity rates under standardized conditions to construct a substrate preference profile

  • Structure-activity relationship studies:

    • Test series of structurally related compounds differing in specific molecular features (hydroxylation pattern, methoxylation, side chain structure)

    • Correlate structural features with catalytic efficiency to identify key substrate recognition determinants

  • Competition assays:

    • Perform experiments with multiple substrates simultaneously to detect preferential oxidation

    • Analyze reaction products to determine regioselectivity of oxidation

  • Advanced analytical techniques:

    • Employ HPLC, LC-MS, or GC-MS to identify and quantify reaction products

    • Use stopped-flow spectroscopy to capture rapid reaction kinetics with different substrates

    • Implement isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine binding parameters for various substrates

  • In silico approaches:

    • Develop molecular docking studies using homology models to predict substrate binding modes

    • Identify potential substrate binding sites through computational analysis of the enzyme structure

How does BpPrx5 compare to peroxidases from other plant species in terms of structure and function?

BpPrx5 shares the conserved structural features of class III plant peroxidases but exhibits species-specific characteristics that distinguish it from other plant peroxidases:

Structural comparisons:

  • Like other plant peroxidases, BpPrx5 likely contains a heme prosthetic group, distal and proximal histidine residues, and calcium binding sites

  • The enzyme may contain surface tyrosine residues involved in substrate oxidation, similar to those identified in Populus alba peroxidase (Tyr74 and Tyr177)

  • The glycosylation pattern is likely species-specific and may differ from other plant peroxidases

Functional comparisons:

  • Studies on birch peroxidase have shown distinct patterns of activity during developmental processes like rejuvenation

  • BpPrx5 likely exhibits unique substrate preferences adapted to the specific phenolic compounds found in birch tissues, which include various phenyl glucoside esters, lignans, diarylheptanoids, and phenolic aldehydes/ketones

  • The enzyme may display specialized adaptations for functioning in the specific physiological and environmental conditions encountered by birch trees

The table below presents a comparative analysis of key features across different plant peroxidases:

CharacteristicBetula pendula Prx5Horseradish PeroxidaseArabidopsis Prx A2Populus alba CWPO-C
Molecular weight35-40 kDa44 kDa33 kDa35-38 kDa
GlycosylationModerateHighModerateModerate
pH optimum5.5-6.56.0-6.55.0-6.05.0-6.0
Substrate preferenceBirch phenolicsBroad rangeMonolignolsSinapyl alcohol, lignin polymers
Surface oxidation sitesLikely presentAbsentAbsentTyr74, Tyr177

What distinguishes BpPrx5 from other peroxidase isoenzymes in Betula pendula?

Betula pendula, like other plants, expresses multiple peroxidase isoenzymes that differ in several aspects:

Tissue-specific expression:

  • BpPrx5 likely has a distinct expression pattern compared to other birch peroxidases

  • Some isoenzymes may be predominantly expressed in specific tissues (xylem, phloem, leaves) or under particular conditions

Developmental regulation:

  • Studies on birch have shown that peroxidase activity varies between mature and rejuvenated tissues, suggesting differential expression or activation of specific isoenzymes during development

  • BpPrx5 may have a specialized role during specific developmental stages or stress responses

Biochemical properties:

  • Each isoenzyme typically has a unique pH optimum, temperature stability, and substrate preference profile

  • Isoelectric points may vary significantly, with some being acidic and others basic, affecting their localization and function

Functional specialization:

  • Some peroxidase isoenzymes may be specialized for lignification, while others focus on stress responses or phenolic compound metabolism

  • BpPrx5 likely has evolved specific functions related to the unique phenolic chemistry of birch trees, potentially interacting with compounds like the phenyl glucoside esters and diarylheptanoids identified in birch wood

Research has identified at least 23 phenolic compounds in birch wood, and different peroxidase isoenzymes may have evolved to interact with specific subsets of these compounds in various physiological contexts .

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to investigate the catalytic mechanism of BpPrx5?

Site-directed mutagenesis represents a powerful approach for investigating the catalytic mechanism of BpPrx5:

Key residues for targeted mutagenesis:

  • Distal and proximal histidines: Mutation of these conserved residues (typically His42 and His170 in plant peroxidases) would confirm their essential role in the catalytic cycle

  • Arginine in the distal pocket: This residue (typically Arg38) is crucial for H₂O₂ binding and activation

  • Surface tyrosine residues: Based on findings in Populus peroxidase, mutation of surface tyrosines (homologous to Tyr74 and Tyr177) would help determine if BpPrx5 employs a similar surface oxidation mechanism

  • Calcium-binding residues: Mutations affecting calcium coordination would reveal the importance of calcium for structural integrity and activity

Experimental approach:

  • Generate single and multiple mutants using overlapping PCR or commercial site-directed mutagenesis kits

  • Express and purify mutant proteins following established protocols for wild-type enzyme

  • Conduct comprehensive kinetic analyses comparing wild-type and mutant enzymes

  • Perform spectroscopic analyses (UV-visible, resonance Raman, EPR) to detect changes in heme environment

  • Employ stopped-flow techniques to analyze individual steps in the catalytic cycle

  • Where possible, determine crystal structures of key mutants to visualize structural changes

Potential mechanistic insights:

  • Identification of residues essential for substrate binding versus catalysis

  • Clarification of whether BpPrx5 employs classical peroxidase mechanism or surface-based oxidation

  • Understanding of structure-function relationships that dictate substrate specificity

What are the emerging applications of recombinant BpPrx5 in biotechnology research?

Recombinant BpPrx5 has emerging applications in several biotechnology research areas:

Bioremediation research:

  • Investigation of BpPrx5's ability to degrade environmental pollutants, particularly phenolic compounds

  • Development of enzyme-based systems for treatment of industrial effluents containing phenolic contaminants

  • Exploration of enzyme immobilization technologies to create reusable biocatalysts for environmental applications

Lignin modification studies:

  • Utilization of BpPrx5 for controlled polymerization or depolymerization of lignin

  • Investigation of enzyme's ability to modify lignin structure for improved biomass processing

  • Comparative studies with other lignin-modifying enzymes to develop enzyme cocktails for biomass conversion

Biosensor development:

  • Creation of peroxidase-based biosensors for detection of H₂O₂, phenolic compounds, or specific environmental pollutants

  • Exploration of enzyme immobilization on various electrode materials

  • Development of enzyme-nanomaterial hybrids with enhanced stability and sensitivity

Biocatalytic synthesis:

  • Exploration of BpPrx5 for regioselective oxidation of complex phenolic compounds

  • Investigation of the enzyme's ability to catalyze C-C and C-O coupling reactions for synthesis of phenolic polymers

  • Development of enzymatic processes for production of high-value compounds derived from birch extractives

These applications leverage the unique properties of BpPrx5, potentially including substrate specificity patterns adapted to the diverse phenolic compounds found in birch tissues .

How does the response of BpPrx5 expression and activity change under various stress conditions?

The expression and activity of plant peroxidases including BpPrx5 undergo significant changes in response to various stress conditions:

Oxidative stress responses:

  • Peroxidase activity in birch has been shown to increase in response to oxidative stress, providing protection against reactive oxygen species

  • Gene expression and enzyme activity likely show dose-dependent responses to H₂O₂ and other oxidative stressors

Environmental stress factors:

  • Heavy metal exposure: Studies on fluctuating asymmetry in Betula pendula under environmental stress conditions suggest adaptive responses to heavy metal contamination, likely involving peroxidase enzyme systems

  • Drought stress: Peroxidase activity typically increases under water deficit conditions to manage increased ROS production

  • Temperature extremes: Both heat and cold stress likely induce changes in BpPrx5 expression and activity as part of the plant's protective response

Developmental factors:

  • Research on birch shows that peroxidase activity varies between mature and rejuvenated tissues, indicating developmental regulation

  • Prolonged subculture time has been shown to affect peroxidase activity in birch shoot apices, suggesting complex temporal regulation

  • High sucrose concentration significantly increases polyphenol oxidase activity and total phenolic concentration, potentially affecting peroxidase expression and activity through interconnected pathways

Tissue-specific variations:

  • Studies on birch have shown differential peroxidase activity in shoot apices, stems, and leaves, reflecting tissue-specific roles

  • The enzyme's response to stressors likely varies across different tissue types, with potential coordination between different peroxidase isoenzymes

What are common challenges in expressing and purifying recombinant BpPrx5, and how can researchers overcome them?

Researchers commonly encounter several challenges when working with recombinant BpPrx5:

Expression challenges:

  • Inclusion body formation in E. coli: Optimize by lowering induction temperature (16-20°C), reducing inducer concentration, or using specialized strains like Origami or SHuffle

  • Low expression levels: Test different promoter systems, optimize codon usage for expression host, or evaluate alternative expression hosts (yeast, insect cells)

  • Heterogeneity in heme incorporation: Supplement growth media with δ-aminolevulinic acid to enhance heme biosynthesis, or add hemin during expression

Purification challenges:

  • Inefficient refolding: Implement step-wise dialysis, test various refolding additives (L-arginine, glycerol, low concentrations of denaturants), or try on-column refolding techniques

  • Heme loss during purification: Include low concentrations of calcium in all buffers, avoid strong chelating agents, and maintain appropriate pH (typically 5.5-7.0)

  • Aggregation during concentration: Add stabilizers like glycerol (10-20%), use moderate protein concentrations, and maintain ionic strength above 50 mM

Activity challenges:

  • Low specific activity: Ensure proper heme incorporation, verify correct disulfide bond formation, and optimize refolding protocol

  • Instability of purified enzyme: Identify optimal storage conditions (buffer composition, pH, additives), consider lyophilization, or store as ammonium sulfate precipitate

  • Batch-to-batch variability: Standardize expression and purification protocols, implement quality control checks (spectral properties, specific activity)

How can researchers differentiate between the activity of BpPrx5 and other oxidative enzymes in complex biological samples?

Differentiating BpPrx5 activity from other oxidative enzymes requires strategic experimental approaches:

Inhibitor-based approaches:

  • Use sodium azide (1-10 mM) as a relatively specific peroxidase inhibitor

  • Apply catalase to eliminate H₂O₂ and inhibit peroxidase reactions while not affecting other oxidases

  • Employ 4-aminobenzoic acid hydrazide as a more selective inhibitor for certain peroxidases

  • Use salicylhydroxamic acid to inhibit certain peroxidases without affecting polyphenol oxidase

Substrate specificity:

  • Select substrates with high specificity for peroxidases (e.g., syringaldazine) over other oxidative enzymes

  • Design comparative assays using substrates specific for different enzyme classes (peroxidases vs. laccases vs. polyphenol oxidases)

  • Analyze reaction products to distinguish between different enzyme activities

Biochemical separation:

  • Employ ion exchange chromatography to separate different enzyme classes based on charge

  • Use size exclusion chromatography to separate enzymes of different molecular weights

  • Implement affinity chromatography with specific ligands for targeted enzyme isolation

Immunological methods:

  • Develop specific antibodies against BpPrx5 for immunoprecipitation or immunodepletion

  • Utilize immunoblotting to specifically detect BpPrx5 protein in complex samples

  • Consider enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for quantitative measurement

Molecular approaches:

  • Design specific primers for RT-PCR to quantify BpPrx5 gene expression

  • Use RNA interference or CRISPR-based approaches in experimental systems to selectively suppress BpPrx5 expression

  • Employ heterologous expression of BpPrx5 to compare native vs. recombinant enzyme properties

What strategies are most effective for studying the interactions between BpPrx5 and potential protein partners or substrates?

To effectively study interactions between BpPrx5 and its potential protein partners or substrates, researchers can employ these strategic approaches:

In vitro interaction studies:

  • Pull-down assays: Immobilize tagged BpPrx5 on appropriate resin and identify interacting proteins from plant extracts using mass spectrometry

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Determine binding kinetics and affinity constants for purified protein partners or substrates

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): Obtain thermodynamic parameters of binding interactions

  • Microscale thermophoresis (MST): Analyze interactions with minimal sample consumption

  • Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry: Identify interaction surfaces and binding sites

Structural approaches:

Computational methods:

  • Molecular docking: Predict binding modes of substrates or protein partners

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Study dynamic aspects of interactions

  • Integrative modeling: Combine experimental data with computational approaches for comprehensive interaction analysis

In vivo approaches:

  • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): Visualize protein-protein interactions in plant cells

  • Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET): Detect interactions between fluorescently labeled proteins

  • Co-immunoprecipitation from plant tissues: Validate physiologically relevant interactions

  • Proximity labeling approaches: Identify proteins in close proximity to BpPrx5 in cellular context

These methodologies provide complementary information about the interaction landscape of BpPrx5, enabling researchers to understand both the structural basis and functional significance of these interactions in the context of birch physiology.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.