The Lyme disease bacterium, Borrelia burgdorferi, is a spirochete that utilizes its periplasmic flagella for motility and infection. Among the proteins crucial for flagellar assembly and function is the M-ring protein, encoded by the gene fliF. The recombinant form of this protein, Recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi Flagellar M-ring protein (fliF), is a genetically engineered version used in research to study its role in flagellar structure and bacterial motility.
The M-ring is a component of the flagellar basal body, which anchors the flagellum to the bacterial cell membrane. In B. burgdorferi, the M-ring is essential for the assembly and stability of the periplasmic flagella. The fliF gene encodes the protein that forms this ring, which is crucial for maintaining the structural integrity of the flagellum and facilitating its rotation.
B. burgdorferi relies on its periplasmic flagella for motility, which is essential for navigating through tissues and reaching the site of infection. The M-ring protein, fliF, plays a critical role in this process by ensuring the proper assembly and function of the flagella. Disruption or mutation in the fliF gene can lead to impaired motility, affecting the bacterium's ability to infect hosts effectively.
| Protein | Function | Role in Motility |
|---|---|---|
| fliF | Forms the M-ring of the flagellar basal body | Essential for flagellar assembly and stability |
| FlhF | Regulates flagellar number and polarity | Controls the number and position of periplasmic flagella |
| FlbB | Forms a periplasmic ring supporting collar assembly | Crucial for flagellar orientation and motility |
| FliL | Enhances motor function by forming a ring around the stator complex | Facilitates assembly of the stator complex |
KEGG: bbu:BB_0291
STRING: 224326.BB_0291
FliF is the primary structural component of the MS-ring (membrane and supramembrane ring) in the Borrelia burgdorferi flagellar motor. The MS-ring serves as the foundation for flagellar assembly, embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane and forming a circular hub that anchors the flagellar structure . In B. burgdorferi, this ring is particularly important because, unlike in many other bacteria, the flagella are located in the periplasmic space rather than externally. The MS-ring formed by FliF provides attachment sites for other flagellar components and contributes to the unique motility of this spirochete, which is essential for its pathogenesis and dissemination within mammalian hosts .
While the core function of forming the MS-ring is conserved, B. burgdorferi FliF has evolved specific adaptations related to the periplasmic location of its flagella. The MS-ring in B. burgdorferi is surrounded by a distinctive collar structure composed of multiple proteins (FlcA, FlcB, FlcC, FlbB, and FlcD/Bb0236) that is not found in most other bacterial flagellar systems . This collar effectively bridges the rotor and the 16 torque-generating stator complexes in each flagellar motor, contributing to the specialized motility of spirochetes in complex environments . Additionally, B. burgdorferi FliF must interact with flagellar proteins like FlbB, which forms a distinctive periplasmic ring around the MS-ring that acts as a scaffold supporting collar assembly and subsequent recruitment of stator complexes .
The FliF protein in B. burgdorferi, when expressed as a recombinant protein fused to an MBP-tag (as described in the pull-down assays), forms a complex with a molecular weight dependent on the native FliF protein plus the 42.4 kDa contributed by the MBP tag . The native FliF forms oligomeric ring structures with specific symmetry that are crucial for flagellar function. Structural studies using cryo-electron tomography have revealed that the MS-ring formed by FliF serves as a central hub around which other flagellar components, including a 16-fold symmetric FlbB ring structure with 32-fold symmetry elements, are organized .
For optimal recombinant expression of B. burgdorferi FliF protein, the gene coding for FliF should be cloned into an expression vector such as pMALc-5x from New England Biolabs (NEB) to express MBP-FliF fusion protein . The vector should then be transformed into E. coli codon plus cells to account for codon usage differences between B. burgdorferi and E. coli. Protein expression should be induced following the manufacturer's instructions for the specific expression system being used. Based on approaches used for similar B. burgdorferi flagellar proteins, expression conditions typically involve induction with IPTG at concentrations between 0.1-1.0 mM when cultures reach mid-log phase, followed by growth at lower temperatures (16-25°C) to enhance proper folding of the recombinant protein .
A highly effective purification strategy for recombinant B. burgdorferi FliF involves:
Expression as an MBP-fusion protein for enhanced solubility
Cell lysis using French press to disrupt the E. coli cells harboring the expression plasmids
Affinity chromatography using amylose resin, which binds specifically to the MBP tag
Elution with maltose buffer according to manufacturer's instructions
Optional: Secondary purification using size exclusion chromatography to separate monomeric from oligomeric species
This approach yields proteins with >90% purity, similar to that achieved with other B. burgdorferi flagellar proteins . For functional studies, it's crucial to verify that the recombinant protein maintains its ability to form oligomeric structures, which can be assessed through analytical ultracentrifugation or negative-stain electron microscopy.
Verification of structural integrity for purified recombinant FliF protein can be accomplished through multiple complementary approaches:
SDS-PAGE analysis to confirm the expected molecular weight (similar to the approach used for flagellin protein, which shows the predicted size of the fusion protein)
Western blotting using antibodies against MBP or, if available, anti-FliF antibodies
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure content
Limited proteolysis to evaluate the folding state of the protein
Negative-stain electron microscopy to visualize oligomeric ring structures that would indicate proper folding and assembly capacity
Functional binding assays with known interaction partners such as FlbB to confirm that the recombinant protein maintains its binding properties
Based on the available research, FliF in B. burgdorferi interacts with several key proteins:
FlbB - Forms a distinctive periplasmic ring around the MS-ring and acts as a scaffold supporting collar assembly
Collar proteins (FlcA, FlcB, FlcC, and FlcD/Bb0236) - Form complex, interconnected protein densities surrounding the MS-ring
FliG - While not explicitly mentioned in the search results, FliG typically interacts with FliF in bacterial flagellar systems to form part of the rotor
Stator complexes - The FliF-based MS-ring indirectly interacts with 16 torque-generating stator complexes through the collar protein network
Pull-down assays have specifically demonstrated interaction between recombinant FLAG-FlbB-His₆ and MBP-FliF proteins, which were co-purified using Ni-NTA agarose resin and detected by immunoblotting with Anti-MBP antibody .
Researchers can quantitatively assess binding affinity between FliF and its interaction partners using multiple biophysical techniques:
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) - Immobilize purified FliF on a sensor chip and flow interaction partners at varying concentrations to determine association and dissociation rate constants (ka and kd) and calculate the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD)
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) - Directly measure the thermodynamic parameters of binding, providing not only binding affinity but also enthalpy and entropy changes
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) - Measure changes in the thermophoretic movement of fluorescently labeled FliF upon binding to interaction partners
Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) - Similar to SPR but using optical interferometry to detect binding
Pull-down assays with quantitative analysis - Similar to the methods described for FlbB-FliF interaction studies, where proteins are mixed in defined ratios, purified using affinity resin, and quantified by immunoblotting
For specificity control, researchers should include appropriate negative controls such as unrelated proteins expressed with the same tags.
FliF forms the MS-ring that serves as the foundation for the unique flagellar collar structure in B. burgdorferi. This collar structure is crucial for the flat-wave morphology and motility of this Lyme disease spirochete . Evidence suggests that FliF provides a stable platform for the recruitment and assembly of collar proteins through direct or indirect interactions. The MS-ring formed by FliF is surrounded by a FlbB ring, which in turn acts as a scaffold supporting collar assembly .
The sequential assembly process likely proceeds as follows:
FliF assembles into the MS-ring in the cytoplasmic membrane
FlbB is recruited to form a distinctive periplasmic ring around the MS-ring
Other collar proteins (FlcA, FlcB, FlcC, and FlcD/Bb0236) assemble onto this scaffold
The complete collar structure facilitates recruitment of stator complexes
Without proper FliF function, this assembly sequence would be disrupted, preventing formation of functional periplasmic flagella and compromising the spirochete's distinctive motility, which is essential for its pathogenesis .
For studying structure-function relationships in recombinant B. burgdorferi FliF, researchers can employ several effective site-directed mutagenesis approaches:
QuikChange Mutagenesis - Design complementary primers containing the desired mutation and use high-fidelity DNA polymerase to amplify the entire plasmid containing the fliF gene
Gibson Assembly - Generate DNA fragments with overlapping ends containing the desired mutations and assemble them in a single isothermal reaction
Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis - Use non-overlapping primers where one or both contain the desired mutations, followed by KLD (kinase, ligase, DpnI) enzyme mix treatment
After generating mutations, express the mutant proteins using the same MBP-fusion system described for wild-type FliF . Crucial mutations to consider include:
Conserved residues at the predicted interfaces with other flagellar proteins
Residues involved in oligomerization
Residues in predicted transmembrane domains
Potential phosphorylation or glycosylation sites that might regulate function
Verify the impact of mutations using structural integrity assays (as described in 2.3) and functional interaction studies with binding partners like FlbB .
Optimizing cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) for studying in situ FliF structure within B. burgdorferi flagellar motors requires attention to several key parameters:
Sample preparation:
Use cell tips where flagellar motors are concentrated
Apply 4-5 μl of bacterial culture to glow-discharged, carbon-coated, copper grids
Plunge-freeze samples in liquid ethane using a vitrification device with controlled humidity
Data collection:
Collect tilt series from approximately -64° to +64° with 2° increments
Use low-dose conditions (~100 electrons/Ų) for the entire tilt series
Implement dose-symmetric acquisition schemes to minimize radiation damage
Tomogram reconstruction:
Align tilt series using fiducial gold markers
Use weighted back-projection or SIRT algorithms for reconstruction
Apply CTF correction to enhance resolution
Subtomogram averaging:
Extract subvolumes containing flagellar motors
Apply alignment and averaging procedures to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio
Implement appropriate symmetry parameters during refinement
Using these optimized approaches, researchers have achieved resolutions of ~13Å for wild-type flagellar motors and ~44Å for mutant structures, allowing detailed visualization of the MS-ring formed by FliF and its interactions with surrounding proteins .
When developing antibodies against B. burgdorferi FliF for immunolocalization studies, researchers should consider:
Antigen selection:
Use full-length recombinant MBP-FliF protein for polyclonal antibody production
Identify surface-exposed epitopes for monoclonal antibody development
Consider using synthetic peptides corresponding to unique regions of FliF
Antibody validation:
Confirm specificity by Western blot against recombinant FliF and B. burgdorferi lysates
Test cross-reactivity with FliF proteins from related spirochetes
Perform immunoprecipitation to verify recognition of native FliF
Immunolocalization optimization:
Controls:
Include fliF knockout mutants as negative controls
Use pre-immune serum for background assessment
Perform peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity
These considerations will help ensure specific and reliable detection of FliF in its native context within the complex flagellar structure of B. burgdorferi.
Mutation or deletion of the fliF gene in B. burgdorferi would have profound effects on motility and virulence:
These effects align with observations that B. burgdorferi motility is essential for dissemination and invasion in the mammalian host, which are in turn essential for pathogenesis . Unlike flagellar filament mutants where specific components like FlaB are degraded by proteases such as HtrA , MS-ring mutants would fail to initiate flagellar assembly altogether, resulting in a more fundamental defect in motility.
The structure of FliF and the MS-ring it forms are fundamentally related to the unique motility patterns of B. burgdorferi in different host environments:
Structural adaptations:
Environment-specific motility:
In low-viscosity environments (like bloodstream), the FliF-based motor structure enables translational movement
In high-viscosity environments (like connective tissues), the same motor structure facilitates cork-screw-like movement
The MS-ring structure allows for coordinated rotation of multiple flagellar motors at both cell poles
Chemotactic adaptation:
The distinct structure of the MS-ring and its integration with spirochete-specific features like the collar ultimately contribute to B. burgdorferi's ability to migrate through diverse host tissues, which is essential for its pathogenic lifecycle .
While the search results don't directly address post-translational modifications (PTMs) of FliF in B. burgdorferi, we can provide a methodological approach to studying this important aspect:
Potential PTMs to investigate:
Phosphorylation - May regulate assembly or motor function
Glycosylation - Could affect interactions with other flagellar components
Proteolytic processing - Might be involved in maturation or regulation
Analytical approaches:
Mass spectrometry analysis of purified native FliF from B. burgdorferi
Comparison of PTM patterns between FliF isolated from different growth conditions
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential modification sites followed by functional assessment
Functional impacts to assess:
Effects on MS-ring assembly and stability
Changes in protein-protein interactions with collar components
Alterations in flagellar filament assembly efficiency
Impacts on motor rotation and switching
Regulatory significance:
PTMs may serve as mechanisms for B. burgdorferi to adapt its motility to different host environments
Modifications could be part of the regulatory network that coordinates flagellar gene expression with assembly
Understanding these modifications would provide insights into the sophisticated regulation of flagellar function that enables B. burgdorferi to navigate and survive in diverse host environments.
A comparative analysis of B. burgdorferi FliF with homologs in other bacteria reveals several important distinctions:
Key structural differences include:
In B. burgdorferi, FliF must accommodate the unique periplasmic location of flagella
B. burgdorferi FliF interacts with spirochete-specific collar proteins essential for its flat-wave morphology
The MS-ring in B. burgdorferi connects to 16 torque-generating stator complexes through the collar structure
These structural adaptations reflect the specialized motility requirements of B. burgdorferi for invasion and dissemination within mammalian hosts .
Several insights from well-studied bacterial flagellar systems can be applied to B. burgdorferi FliF research:
Structural biology approaches:
High-resolution structures of FliF from E. coli and Salmonella can guide modeling of B. burgdorferi FliF domains
Symmetry determination methods used in other systems can be applied to understand the B. burgdorferi MS-ring
Assembly mechanisms:
Knowledge about FliF oligomerization in model organisms can inform studies of B. burgdorferi MS-ring formation
Understanding of membrane insertion and anchoring from other systems may apply to B. burgdorferi FliF
Regulatory insights:
Transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms identified in other bacteria may have parallels in B. burgdorferi
Export and assembly checkpoints known from model systems can guide investigation of B. burgdorferi flagellar assembly
Experimental techniques:
FRET-based protein interaction assays developed for other flagellar systems
Single-molecule approaches to study motor function and dynamics
In vitro reconstitution methods to study isolated components
Validating structural predictions from AlphaFold or similar tools for B. burgdorferi FliF requires a multi-faceted approach:
Computational validation:
Assess confidence scores (pLDDT values) from AlphaFold predictions
Compare predictions from multiple tools (AlphaFold, RoseTTAFold, etc.)
Use evolutionary coupling analysis to verify predicted contacts
Experimental validation:
Limited proteolysis to probe accessible regions and domain boundaries
Circular dichroism to verify secondary structure content matches predictions
Cross-linking mass spectrometry to validate predicted proximity of amino acids
Cryo-EM of purified recombinant FliF to verify oligomeric structure
Mutational analysis:
In situ validation:
This approach, similar to that used for FlbB structural modeling , provides robust validation of computational predictions and ensures that structural models accurately represent the native FliF protein.
Engineering FliF as a platform for heterologous antigen display offers several advantages for vaccine development:
Design considerations:
Identify surface-exposed loops in the FliF structure that can accommodate insertions
Use structural modeling to predict optimal insertion sites that won't disrupt MS-ring formation
Create genetic constructs that fuse antigenic epitopes to these permissive sites
Expression strategies:
Develop complementation systems where engineered FliF replaces native FliF
Create dual-expression systems where both native and engineered FliF are co-expressed
Optimize expression levels to ensure proper flagellar assembly
Validation methods:
Verify MS-ring assembly and flagellar function in engineered strains
Confirm surface exposure of inserted epitopes using immunogold electron microscopy
Assess immune responses to the displayed antigens in animal models
Potential applications:
Display protective antigens from B. burgdorferi for Lyme disease vaccines
Create multivalent vaccines by displaying antigens from multiple pathogens
Develop diagnostic tools using engineered FliF displaying specific epitopes
This approach takes advantage of the organized, multimeric structure of FliF while utilizing B. burgdorferi's natural adjuvant properties to potentially enhance immune responses.
Studying FliF assembly and turnover dynamics in live B. burgdorferi presents several challenges and potential solutions:
Challenges:
The small size of B. burgdorferi cells (approximately 0.2-0.5 μm in diameter)
The periplasmic location of flagella, making them less accessible
Limited genetic tools compared to model organisms
The complex structure of the flagellar motor with multiple interacting components
Solutions for visualization:
Fluorescent protein fusions with FliF that retain function
Split-fluorescent protein complementation to study FliF-partner interactions
Photoactivatable or photoconvertible FliF fusions for pulse-chase experiments
Super-resolution microscopy techniques (PALM, STORM) to overcome size limitations
Solutions for turnover studies:
Inducible expression systems to control FliF production
Protein degradation tags to trigger selective FliF removal
Quantitative proteomic approaches using stable isotope labeling
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) with functional fluorescent fusions
Solutions for assembly studies:
Single-molecule tracking of labeled FliF components
Correlative light and electron microscopy to connect dynamics with structure
Microfluidic systems for rapid environmental changes to trigger assembly
These approaches would provide unprecedented insights into the dynamic processes of flagellar motor assembly in this important pathogen.
A multi-omics approach to create comprehensive models of B. burgdorferi flagellar assembly centered on FliF would integrate:
Structural omics:
Functional omics:
Transcriptomics to identify co-regulated flagellar genes
Proteomics to quantify stoichiometry and post-translational modifications
Phenomics relating flagellar structure variants to motility phenotypes
Interactomics mapping the complete network of protein-protein interactions
Regulatory omics:
ChIP-seq to identify transcription factor binding sites controlling flagellar gene expression
RNA-seq under different conditions to map environmental regulation
Phosphoproteomics to identify signaling networks controlling assembly
Metabolomics to link metabolic state to flagellar function
Integration strategies:
Mathematical modeling of assembly pathways with kinetic parameters
Machine learning approaches to predict assembly outcomes from multi-omics data
Systems biology frameworks connecting regulation to structure and function
4D visualization tools to represent the temporal dimension of assembly
This integrated approach would provide a holistic understanding of how B. burgdorferi coordinates the complex process of flagellar assembly, with FliF serving as the foundation for this elaborate nanomachine that is essential for pathogenesis .
The FliF-based flagellar assembly pathway offers several promising therapeutic targets for controlling B. burgdorferi infection:
FliF-FlbB interface:
MS-ring assembly:
Compounds that interfere with FliF oligomerization could prevent MS-ring formation
These would act early in the flagellar assembly process, having maximal impact
The unique features of the B. burgdorferi MS-ring could allow for specificity
FliF-specific regions:
Targeting spirochete-specific regions of FliF not present in commensal bacteria
This approach could minimize disruption of beneficial microbiota
Monoclonal antibodies against these regions could be effective in early infection
Regulatory pathways:
Targeting regulatory mechanisms controlling fliF expression
Disrupting export or assembly checkpoints specific to B. burgdorferi
Triggering premature degradation of FliF through proteolytic pathways
These approaches would directly impact B. burgdorferi motility, which is essential for its dissemination and invasion in the mammalian host, processes that are critical for pathogenesis .
Several critical questions about B. burgdorferi FliF structure and function remain unresolved and should be prioritized in future research:
Structural questions:
What is the atomic-resolution structure of B. burgdorferi FliF, and how does it differ from non-spirochete homologs?
How does FliF oligomerize to form the MS-ring, and what determines its diameter and curvature?
What specific interfaces mediate FliF interaction with unique spirochete components like FlbB and the collar proteins?
Assembly questions:
What is the temporal sequence of FliF assembly into the MS-ring?
How is FliF targeted to the membrane and what chaperones are involved?
What quality control mechanisms ensure proper MS-ring assembly?
Functional questions:
How does the MS-ring structure contribute to the unique rotational properties of spirochete flagella?
What role does FliF play in the directional switching of flagellar motors?
How do post-translational modifications regulate FliF function under different conditions?
Evolutionary questions:
How has FliF evolved specifically in spirochetes to accommodate periplasmic flagella?
What structural adaptations in FliF contribute to the distinctive motility patterns of B. burgdorferi?
How do sequence variations in FliF across Borrelia strains relate to differences in motility and virulence?
Addressing these questions would significantly advance our understanding of this fundamental protein and potentially lead to new therapeutic approaches targeting B. burgdorferi motility.
Emerging technologies are poised to revolutionize our understanding and manipulation of B. burgdorferi FliF:
Structural biology advances:
Cryo-electron tomography with improved detectors and phase plates could achieve sub-nanometer resolution of in situ flagellar motors
Integrative structural biology combining cryo-ET, X-ray crystallography, and AlphaFold predictions to build complete atomic models
Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture intermediates in MS-ring assembly
Advanced image processing algorithms to extract more information from existing data
Synthetic biology approaches:
CRISPR-Cas systems optimized for B. burgdorferi to enable precise genetic manipulation
Optogenetic control of FliF expression or degradation to study assembly dynamics
Synthetic flagellar motors with modified or hybrid components to understand design principles
Cell-free expression systems to study flagellar assembly in controlled environments
Nanotechnology integration:
Single-molecule force spectroscopy to measure mechanical properties of FliF interactions
Nanobody-based probes for super-resolution imaging of flagellar structures
Microfluidic devices mimicking host environments to study contextual flagellar function
DNA origami scaffolds to template and study controlled FliF assembly
Computational advances:
Molecular dynamics simulations of complete MS-ring structure in membrane environments
Machine learning approaches to predict functional consequences of FliF mutations
Systems biology models integrating structural, genetic, and proteomic data