Recombinant Bothrops insularis C-type lectin BiL

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
C-type lectin BiL; CTL
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
24-158
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Bothrops insularis (Golden lancehead) (Lachesis insularis)
Target Protein Sequence
NNCPQDW LPMNGLCYKI FDELKAWKDA EMFCRKYKPG CHLASFHLYG ESPEIAEYIS DYHKGQSEVW IGLWDKKKDF SWEWTDRSCT DYLSWDKNQP DHYQNKEFCV ELVSDTGYRL WNDQVCESKN AFLCQCKF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This lectin demonstrates hemagglutinating activity, inhibited by galactose, lactose, and EDTA. Its activity is calcium-dependent.
Protein Families
True venom lectin family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed by the venom gland.

Q&A

What is Bothrops insularis C-type lectin (BiL)?

BiL is a carbohydrate-binding protein (lectin) isolated from the venom of Bothrops insularis, commonly known as the golden lancehead snake. It belongs to the C-type lectin family, which requires calcium ions for their carbohydrate-binding activity. BiL is a disulfide-linked dimeric protein with monomers of approximately 16,206 m/z, as determined by mass spectrometry analysis. The protein displays hemagglutinating activity that can be inhibited by specific carbohydrates such as galactose and lactose, as well as by the calcium-chelating agent EDTA. BiL shares significant sequence similarity with other snake venom C-type lectins, suggesting evolutionary conservation of structure and function within this protein family .

How is BiL structurally characterized?

BiL's structural characterization involves several complementary techniques. The protein exists as a disulfide-linked dimer, with each monomer having a molecular weight of 16,206 m/z as determined by mass spectrometry. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) confirms its dimeric nature. The primary structure of BiL was initially deduced from its cDNA sequence obtained from a venom gland cDNA library and subsequently verified through Edman degradation sequencing and peptide mass fingerprinting analysis. Modeling studies have provided insights into BiL's three-dimensional structure, particularly its dimeric configuration and the structural elements responsible for carbohydrate and calcium binding. These structural studies reveal the presence of carbohydrate recognition domains typical of C-type lectins, which are crucial for their biological activities .

What are the primary functional properties of BiL?

The primary functional property of BiL is its carbohydrate-binding activity, specifically its ability to recognize and bind to certain sugars like galactose and lactose. This property is demonstrated through hemagglutination assays, where BiL causes the agglutination of red blood cells—a process that can be inhibited by specific sugars or by removing calcium with EDTA. Like other snake venom C-type lectins, BiL likely participates in various biological processes related to the venom's effects on prey, potentially including effects on platelets, coagulation factors, or other components of the hemostatic system. The calcium dependency of BiL's activity is a characteristic feature of C-type lectins, indicating that calcium ions play a crucial role in maintaining the proper conformation of the carbohydrate-binding site .

How does the recombinant expression system affect BiL's post-translational modifications?

The choice of expression system significantly impacts post-translational modifications (PTMs) of recombinant BiL. Baculovirus expression systems are often preferred for producing recombinant snake venom proteins due to their capacity to perform complex eukaryotic PTMs. When expressing BiL in baculovirus systems, researchers should consider potential differences in glycosylation patterns compared to the native protein from snake venom. These differences may affect protein folding, stability, and carbohydrate-binding specificity. Comparative analyses using techniques such as mass spectrometry and glycan profiling between native and recombinant BiL can reveal important differences in PTMs. Researchers should be particularly attentive to disulfide bond formation, which is critical for maintaining the dimeric structure of BiL, as improper disulfide pairing could significantly alter the protein's functional properties .

What methodological challenges exist in studying BiL's interaction with cellular targets?

Investigating BiL's interactions with cellular targets presents several methodological challenges. First, distinguishing specific from non-specific binding requires careful experimental design, including appropriate negative controls and competition assays with known ligands like galactose and lactose. Second, the calcium dependency of BiL's activity necessitates precise control of calcium concentrations in experimental buffers. Third, the dimeric nature of BiL creates potential avidity effects that can complicate the interpretation of binding kinetics and affinity measurements. Surface plasmon resonance, isothermal titration calorimetry, and fluorescence-based binding assays need to be carefully optimized to account for these factors. Additionally, when studying BiL's effects on cells like platelets or endothelial cells, researchers must consider the complex milieu of cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids that might serve as BiL receptors, potentially necessitating approaches like glycan array screening to identify specific binding partners .

How can structural modeling inform the design of BiL mutants for structure-function studies?

Structural modeling provides invaluable insights for designing BiL mutants to investigate structure-function relationships. Based on modeling studies of BiL's dimeric structure and its structural determinants for carbohydrate and calcium binding, researchers can identify key residues involved in these functions. For carbohydrate binding, residues in the carbohydrate recognition domain that directly interact with sugars like galactose or lactose would be primary targets for site-directed mutagenesis. Similarly, residues coordinating calcium ions can be mutated to assess the precise role of calcium in maintaining the protein's structure and function. Residues at the dimer interface are excellent candidates for mutations aimed at understanding the importance of dimerization for BiL's biological activities. Additionally, comparing BiL's modeled structure with other C-type lectins can reveal conserved and divergent regions that might explain differences in carbohydrate specificity or biological activities, guiding the design of chimeric proteins or domain-swapping experiments .

How can hemagglutination assays be optimized for studying BiL's activity?

Optimizing hemagglutination assays for BiL requires careful consideration of several parameters. First, the choice of erythrocytes impacts assay sensitivity, with different species' red blood cells exhibiting varying susceptibilities to lectin-mediated agglutination. Researchers should screen erythrocytes from different sources (human, rabbit, etc.) to identify the most responsive type for BiL studies. Second, the assay buffer composition is critical, particularly calcium concentration, which should be optimized to support BiL's activity while avoiding calcium-induced erythrocyte aggregation. Third, temperature and incubation time affect agglutination kinetics and should be standardized for reproducible results. For quantitative analyses, serial dilutions of BiL can establish the minimum concentration required for hemagglutination (hemagglutinating unit). To confirm specificity, inhibition assays with sugars like galactose and lactose should be performed in parallel. Additionally, negative controls using calcium-free buffers with EDTA can verify the calcium dependency of the observed activity. These optimized hemagglutination assays provide a functional readout for comparing wild-type and mutant BiL proteins or for assessing the effects of experimental conditions on BiL's carbohydrate-binding activity .

What expression systems are most suitable for producing functional recombinant BiL?

Selecting the appropriate expression system for recombinant BiL production requires balancing considerations of yield, functionality, and post-translational modifications. Baculovirus expression systems in insect cells represent an excellent choice for BiL production, as indicated by the commercial availability of baculovirus-expressed recombinant BiL. These eukaryotic systems provide machinery for proper protein folding and formation of disulfide bonds, which are critical for BiL's dimeric structure. Additionally, insect cells can perform many of the post-translational modifications that might be present in native BiL. While bacterial expression systems like E. coli offer high yields and ease of manipulation, they lack sophisticated machinery for disulfide bond formation and post-translational modifications, potentially necessitating in vitro refolding protocols. Yeast expression systems present an intermediate option, with better capacity for disulfide bond formation than bacteria but potentially different glycosylation patterns than the native protein. Mammalian expression systems, though more expensive, could be considered for advanced functional studies where mammalian-type glycosylation might be important. For each expression system, optimization of expression conditions, including temperature, induction parameters, and harvest timing, is essential to maximize the yield of correctly folded, functional BiL .

What insights can BiL provide about the evolution of snake venom C-type lectins?

BiL offers valuable insights into the evolutionary history of snake venom C-type lectins. Sequence analysis shows that BiL shares significant similarity with other members of the C-type lectin family from various snake species, suggesting that these proteins evolved from a common ancestral gene. The conservation of structural features like calcium-binding sites and cysteine residues involved in disulfide bonding across species indicates strong evolutionary pressure to maintain these functional elements. Comparative studies between BiL and other snake venom lectins, as well as with non-venom C-type lectins, can illuminate the molecular adaptations that occurred during the recruitment and modification of these proteins for venom function. Additionally, examining variations in carbohydrate-binding specificity among snake venom lectins might reveal adaptations to different prey types targeted by different snake species. These evolutionary perspectives contribute to our broader understanding of venom as a complex adaptive trait and the molecular mechanisms underlying the diversification of venom components .

How can BiL be used as a tool in glycobiology research?

BiL's specific carbohydrate-binding properties make it a valuable tool in glycobiology research. As a lectin with documented specificity for galactose and lactose, BiL can be employed in various applications for detecting, isolating, and characterizing glycoconjugates containing these sugars. In histochemistry and cytochemistry, fluorescently labeled BiL can visualize the distribution of galactose-containing glycans in tissue sections or on cell surfaces. For glycoprotein purification, BiL-based affinity chromatography can isolate specific glycoproteins from complex mixtures. In glycomics studies, BiL can be incorporated into lectin arrays for high-throughput screening of glycan structures. Additionally, comparing the binding profiles of BiL with other galactose-binding lectins can provide nuanced information about the fine specificity of glycan recognition. For these applications, recombinant BiL offers advantages over native protein, including consistent quality, absence of other venom components, and the possibility of engineering modifications like fluorescent tags or biotinylation sites to enhance utility in specific experimental contexts .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.