STRING: 9913.ENSBTAP00000055855
UniGene: Bt.33483
Bovine Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 149 (CCDC149) belongs to the CCDC protein family characterized by alpha-helical coiled-coil structural motifs. These motifs facilitate protein-protein interactions and can form dimeric or multimeric complexes essential for protein function. The coiled-coil domains typically contain heptad repeat patterns with hydrophobic residues in specific positions that create an amphipathic helix. While the specific sequence of bovine CCDC149 has similarities with human CCDC149, researchers should note that the full sequence conservation and structural elements may differ between species. For recombinant expression, understanding these structural characteristics is essential for proper folding and function .
Based on established protocols for related CCDC proteins, E. coli remains the most widely used expression system for producing Recombinant Bovine CCDC149. For optimal expression, consider the following methodology:
Vector selection: pET or pGEX vectors with T7 promoters offer high-level expression
Tags: N-terminal His6 tags facilitate purification while minimally affecting protein structure
Expression conditions: Induction at OD600 0.6-0.8 with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at 16-18°C overnight typically reduces inclusion body formation
Buffer composition: PBS with 1M Urea at pH 7.4 is often suitable for stabilization
When expressing CCDC149, researchers should monitor protein solubility as coiled-coil domains can sometimes aggregate. Lower induction temperatures (16°C) and longer expression times often improve proper folding and solubility .
Multi-step purification protocols yield the highest purity for Recombinant Bovine CCDC149:
| Purification Step | Method | Buffer Composition | Expected Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Capture | IMAC (Ni-NTA) | 50 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0 | >70% purity |
| Intermediate | Ion-exchange chromatography | 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 with gradient to 1M NaCl | >85% purity |
| Polishing | Size exclusion chromatography | PBS, pH 7.4 | >95% purity |
For optimal storage after purification, maintain the protein in PBS with 1M urea at pH 7.4, aliquot to avoid freeze-thaw cycles, and store at -20°C. This methodology typically yields preparations with >80% purity suitable for most research applications .
While specific bovine applications are still emerging, recombinant CCDC149 has been validated for several research applications that can be applied to bovine studies:
Antibody validation and competition assays
Protein-protein interaction studies
Structural analysis through circular dichroism or X-ray crystallography
Blocking/neutralizing experiments to assess functional roles
Researchers should consider using properly folded recombinant protein as a positive control in immunoassays and western blotting applications. Additionally, recombinant CCDC149 can serve as an antigen for generating specific antibodies for immunohistochemistry and localization studies in bovine tissues .
To investigate CCDC149 function in bovine cellular systems, employ a multi-faceted approach:
Gene expression manipulation:
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to introduce mutations or knockdown CCDC149
siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown in bovine cell lines
Overexpression using lentiviral vectors with inducible promoters
Protein interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation with potential binding partners
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID or APEX)
Yeast two-hybrid screening for novel interactions
Functional assessment:
Subcellular localization through immunofluorescence
Response to cellular stressors (oxidative stress, heat shock)
Cell phenotype analysis after expression modulation
Transcriptomic approaches to study CCDC149 expression in bovine systems should include:
RNA-Seq analysis:
Compare expression across different bovine tissues and developmental stages
Analyze differential expression under disease conditions or treatments
Identify co-expressed genes that may function in the same pathways
In situ hybridization techniques:
RNAscope for highly specific cellular localization
Fluorescent in situ hybridization for co-localization studies with other transcripts
Chromogenic in situ hybridization for tissue distribution analysis
Single-cell RNA-Seq:
Identify cell type-specific expression patterns
Map CCDC149 expression in heterogeneous tissue populations
For reliable results, researchers should collect samples consistently, use appropriate normalization methods for RNA-Seq data, and validate findings through RT-qPCR or protein-level analysis .
For comparative functional analysis of CCDC149 across species:
| Species | Sequence Similarity | Known Functions | Cellular Localization | Experimental Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bovine (Bos taurus) | Reference | Under investigation | Presumed cytoplasmic | Primary bovine cells, bovine cell lines |
| Human | Moderate-high | Not fully characterized | Cytoplasmic | Human cell lines (HEK293, HeLa) |
| Mouse | Moderate | No experimental evidence for molecular function | Not fully determined | Mouse models, mouse embryonic fibroblasts |
| Other mammals | Variable | Limited data available | Variable | Species-dependent |
When conducting cross-species functional comparisons, researchers should:
Perform sequence alignments focusing on conserved domains
Compare expression patterns in homologous tissues
Test functional complementation in knockout/knockdown models
Assess interaction partner conservation
This comparative approach can provide insights into evolutionarily conserved functions versus species-specific adaptations of CCDC149 .
To investigate CCDC149's potential role in bovine immune responses:
Immune cell expression profiling:
Isolate specific bovine immune cell populations (T cells, B cells, macrophages)
Quantify CCDC149 expression by RT-qPCR and western blotting
Compare expression levels before and after immune stimulation
Functional immune assays:
Co-culture systems with macrophages and T cells with CCDC149 modulation
Cytokine production measurement after CCDC149 knockdown/overexpression
Phagocytosis and bacterial killing assays in CCDC149-modified cells
Infection models:
Monitor CCDC149 expression changes during bacterial challenges (e.g., Mycobacterium bovis)
Assess correlation between CCDC149 expression and bacterial survival
Evaluate immune cell recruitment and activation in relation to CCDC149 levels
When designing immune function studies, researchers should consider the temporal dynamics of immune responses and use appropriate stimulation conditions that mimic physiological challenges .
Structural biology methodologies provide critical insights into CCDC149 function:
Computational structure prediction:
Homology modeling based on known coiled-coil domain structures
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational flexibility
Protein-protein docking to identify potential interaction interfaces
Experimental structure determination:
X-ray crystallography of purified recombinant protein
Cryo-electron microscopy for larger complexes
NMR spectroscopy for dynamic structural analysis
Structure-function analysis:
Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted functional residues
Domain deletion studies to map functional regions
Cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify interacting domains
For successful structural studies, researchers should focus on producing highly pure (>95%), homogeneous protein preparations and consider expressing individual domains separately if the full-length protein proves challenging to crystallize .
When designing antibodies against bovine CCDC149:
Epitope selection strategy:
Target unique, accessible regions not conserved in other CCDC family proteins
Avoid hydrophobic regions within coiled-coil domains that may be inaccessible
Consider both linear and conformational epitopes
Use this peptide sequence as a starting point for antibody generation: SVDELQDVKEERSSYQDKVERL
Validation methodology:
Confirm specificity using recombinant CCDC149 as a positive control
Perform antibody competition assays with purified protein
Validate in multiple applications (western blot, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence)
Include knockout/knockdown controls to confirm specificity
Polyclonal vs. monoclonal considerations:
Polyclonal antibodies offer broader epitope recognition but lower specificity
Monoclonal antibodies provide consistent results across experiments but may be sensitive to epitope masking
For optimal results, researchers should validate antibodies in the specific bovine tissue or cell type of interest and confirm cross-reactivity if using antibodies raised against human or mouse CCDC149 .