How do redox modifications regulate ATG4B activity, and how can this be experimentally dissected?
ATG4B activity is reversibly inhibited by oxidation at Cys292 and Cys361, forming intramolecular disulfide bonds.
Approach:
Treat recombinant ATG4B with H₂O₂ (oxidizing agent) or DTT (reducing agent) and assay proteolytic activity .
Use site-directed mutagenesis (e.g., C292S/C361S) to create redox-insensitive variants. These mutants retain activity under oxidative stress .
Monitor autophagic flux in redox-insensitive mutant cells via LC3-II turnover under H₂O₂ exposure .
How do conflicting reports on ATG4B’s role in cancer biology arise, and how can researchers address them?
ATG4B shows context-dependent roles: pro-survival in colorectal cancer vs. growth-inhibitory in triple-negative breast cancer .
Resolution strategies:
Cell line specificity: Compare ATG4B inhibition effects across cancer subtypes (e.g., HER2+ vs. HER2– breast cancer) .
Autophagy-independent pathways: Use transcriptomics/proteomics to identify non-canonical ATG4B interactors (e.g., HER2) .
In vivo validation: Test ATG4B inhibitors (e.g., LV-320) in xenograft models of divergent cancer types .
What structural features of ATG4B determine substrate specificity for LC3 vs. GABARAP proteins?
The C-terminal LC3-interacting region (LIR) motif (residues 393–396) is critical:
Experimental proof:
Table 1: Redox regulation of ATG4B activity
| Condition | ATG4B Activity | LC3-II Levels | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| H₂O₂ (oxidative) | Inhibited | Increased | |
| DTT (reductive) | Activated | Decreased | |
| C292,361S mutant | Constitutively active | Stable |
Table 2: ATG4B inhibitors and their mechanisms
| Compound | Target Site | IC₅₀ (μM) | Cellular Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| LV-320 | Catalytic cleft | 0.8 | Blocks autophagic flux |
| NSC185058 | LIR motif | 5.2 | Reduces GABARAP binding |