Recombinant Bovine Serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B (SPTSSB)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Production and Purification

Recombinant bovine SPTSSB is synthesized using diverse expression systems, with purity and yield optimized through specific protocols:

ParameterDetails
Host SystemsE. coli, HEK293 cells, wheat germ, or cell-free systems
Purification MethodsSDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining (>80% purity)
Concentration50 µg/mL in Tris-based buffer (pH 7.3) with 10% glycerol
Storage-20°C or -80°C; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

Tag Variations: The C-terminal Myc-DYKDDDDK tag enhances detection in antibody assays , while His-tag facilitates immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) .

Biochemical Functions and Pathways

SPTSSB regulates sphingolipid metabolism by influencing SPT activity and substrate preference:

FunctionMechanismInteracting Proteins
Enzymatic ActivityContributes to serine C-palmitoyltransferase activity with SPTLC1/SPTLC2 SPTSSA (small subunit A)
Substrate SpecificityModulates affinity for C18 fatty acyl-CoA, influencing LCB chain length SPTLC1, SPTLC2, SPTLC3
Protein BindingInteracts with SCARB1, ATP7A, and other membrane-associated proteins C9orf116, PAEP, FAM72A

Key Finding: A mutation in Sptssb (Stellar mutation) increases SPT affinity for C18 substrates, leading to elevated 20-carbon long-chain bases (C20 LCBs) and neurodegeneration in mice .

Applications in Research

Recombinant SPTSSB serves as a tool for studying sphingolipid biosynthesis and related diseases:

ApplicationDetails
Antibody ProductionUsed as a native antigen for generating anti-SPTSSB antibodies
ELISA/AssaysStandard control in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
Neurodegeneration ModelsDemonstrates how altered LCB chain length disrupts protein homeostasis
Sphingolipid MetabolismAnalyzes SPT isoform-specific roles in LCB production

Experimental Insights:

  • C20 LCB Toxicity: Overexpression of C20 LCBs due to SPTSSB mutations causes axon degeneration and ubiquitinated protein accumulation .

  • Subunit Interactions: SPTSSB and SPTSSA differentially regulate SPT activity, with SPTSSB favoring C18 substrates .

Regulatory and Handling Considerations

ParameterDetails
Storage Buffer25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.3), 100 mM glycine, 10% glycerol
StabilityStable at -80°C for long-term storage; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
HandlingThaw on ice; aliquot into single-use tubes for short-term use

Research Findings and Clinical Relevance

  • Neurodegenerative Diseases: Dysregulation of SPTSSB-linked LCB synthesis may contribute to conditions like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s .

  • Cancer Metabolism: SPTSSB’s role in sphingolipid homeostasis positions it as a potential therapeutic target .

  • Comparative Biology: Bovine SPTSSB shares structural homology with human and mouse orthologs, enabling cross-species studies .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, we are happy to accommodate specific requests. Please indicate your desired format in the order notes, and we will do our best to fulfill your needs.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchase method and location. For precise delivery estimates, please contact your local distributor.
Note: All protein shipments are standardly packaged with blue ice packs. Should dry ice packaging be required, please communicate with us in advance. Additional fees may apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. For optimal usage, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
For optimal reconstitution, we recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Please reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend incorporating 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%, serving as a convenient reference point.
Shelf Life
The shelf life of our products is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein itself.
Generally, liquid formulations have a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized formulations, on the other hand, exhibit a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. For multiple uses, aliquoting is recommended. To maintain product integrity, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is established during the production process. Should you have a specific tag type preference, please communicate it to us, and we will prioritize the development of your requested tag.
Synonyms
SPTSSB; ADMP; SSSPTB; Serine palmitoyltransferase small subunit B; Protein ADMP; Small subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase B; ssSPTb
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-76
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Bos taurus (Bovine)
Target Names
SPTSSB
Target Protein Sequence
MDFKRVKDYLSWLYYQYQIISCCAVLEPWEQSMFNTIILTIFAMVVYTAYVFIPIHIRLA WEFFSKMCGYHSTISN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SPTSSB acts as a stimulator of serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) activity. The composition of the SPT complex dictates substrate preference, with complexes containing this subunit exhibiting a clear preference for longer acyl-CoAs. Notably, the SPTLC1-SPTLC2-SPTSSB complex demonstrates a strong affinity for C18-CoA substrates, while the SPTLC1-SPTLC3-SPTSSB isozyme displays broader acyl-CoA utilization without a distinct preference.
Database Links
Protein Families
SPTSS family, SPTSSB subfamily
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the functional role of SPTSSB in the serine palmitoyltransferase complex?

SPTSSB functions as one of the small subunits in the trimeric serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) enzyme complex. The SPT enzyme consists of two large subunits (SPTLC1 and either SPTLC2 or SPTLC3) and a small subunit (either SPTssa or SPTssb). This complex catalyzes the condensation of L-serine and palmitoyl-CoA, which constitutes the rate-limiting step in the de novo synthesis of sphingolipids . The small subunits play a critical role in controlling SPT activity, substrate affinity, and specifying sphingolipid long chain base (LCB) chain length in vivo . Studies have shown that mutations in SPTSSB can significantly alter the enzyme's substrate affinity, demonstrating its importance in regulating the specificity and activity of the SPT complex .

How do SPT small subunits differ from the large subunits in structure and function?

The SPT enzyme consists of large subunits (SPTLC1, SPTLC2, or SPTLC3) with molecular weights of approximately 53 kDa and 63 kDa, forming the core heterodimer . The small subunits (SPTssa or SPTssb) associate with these large subunits to form a functional trimeric complex.

While the large subunits provide the primary catalytic framework of the enzyme, the small subunits serve as crucial regulators that fine-tune substrate specificity and enzymatic activity. Specifically, the small subunits play a major role in determining sphingolipid long chain base length by influencing the affinity of the enzyme toward different fatty acyl-CoA substrates . This regulatory function is evidenced by studies demonstrating that mutations in SPTSSB can alter substrate preference, such as increasing affinity for C18 fatty acyl-CoA, which subsequently changes the profile of sphingolipids produced .

What experimental systems are suitable for studying recombinant bovine SPTSSB?

Several experimental systems have proven effective for studying recombinant SPTSSB:

  • Mammalian expression systems: HEK293 cells can be used for co-transfection of SPTSSB with other SPT subunits using plasmids like pcDNA3.1ZEO. Selection can be performed using antibiotics such as geneticin (400 μg/ml) or zeocin (200 μg/ml) to establish stable cell lines .

  • Bacterial expression systems: For producing soluble SPT, expression systems based on S. paucimobilis have been utilized successfully .

  • Mouse models: Transgenic and knockout mouse models have been instrumental in studying the in vivo functions of SPTSSB, particularly in investigating the neurological phenotypes associated with SPTSSB mutations .

For confirmation of successful expression, techniques such as RT-PCR for transcript detection and western blotting for protein expression are commonly employed. When selecting colonies after transfection, it is advisable to screen multiple clones (at least 3) to identify the highest expressing cell line for further studies .

How does the mutation in SPTSSB affect sphingolipid metabolism and what are the neurological consequences?

The Stellar (Stl) mutation in SPTSSB significantly alters sphingolipid metabolism by increasing the enzyme's affinity toward C18 fatty acyl-CoA substrate by approximately twofold. This enhanced affinity results in elevated production of 20-carbon (C20) long chain bases (LCBs) in neural tissues, particularly in the brain and eye .

The neurological consequences of this altered sphingolipid metabolism are profound and multifaceted:

  • Structural abnormalities: Mutant mice exhibit aberrant membrane structures in neural tissues.

  • Protein homeostasis disruption: Accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins on membranes occurs, indicating impaired protein degradation pathways.

  • Neurodegeneration: Axon degeneration becomes evident, compromising neural function.

These findings suggest that even subtle alterations in sphingolipid composition, particularly elevations in C20 LCBs or sphingolipids containing C20 LCBs, can severely impair protein homeostasis and neural function . This highlights the critical importance of precise regulation of sphingolipid chain length in maintaining neural health and function.

What considerations should be taken when designing experiments to measure SPTSSB-mediated alterations in sphingolipid profiles?

When designing experiments to measure SPTSSB-mediated alterations in sphingolipid profiles, researchers should consider several critical factors:

  • Sample preparation methodology: Depending on the research question, decide whether to use total cell lysate or microsomal preparations. While microsomes traditionally provide improved specific activity, recent methodological advances allow for accurate measurements in total cell lysate when 0.1% sucrose monolaurate (SML) is added to inhibit interfering thioesterase activity .

  • Detection method selection: Consider the sensitivity requirements of your experiment:

    • Radioactive assay using [14C]labeled L-serine: Suitable for standard measurements but has lower sensitivity.

    • HPLC-based assay: Offers a 20-fold lower detection limit compared to radioactive methods and allows the use of an internal standard to correct for extraction variations .

  • Substrate considerations: For comprehensive analysis, use optimal substrate concentrations (5 mM L-serine for HPLC-based assays or 0.5 mM for radioactive assays; 50 μM palmitoyl-CoA; 20 μM pyridoxal 5′-phosphate) .

  • Tissue-specific effects: Since SPTSSB mutations can affect different tissues differently, particularly neural tissues, design sampling strategies that account for tissue-specific variations in sphingolipid profiles .

  • Temporal dynamics: Consider time-course experiments to capture the progressive effects of SPTSSB alterations, as sphingolipid changes may have cascading effects on cellular function over time.

How can researchers distinguish between direct effects of SPTSSB alterations and secondary consequences in sphingolipid metabolic pathways?

Distinguishing between direct and secondary effects of SPTSSB alterations requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Time-course analysis: Monitor sphingolipid profile changes chronologically after inducing SPTSSB alterations. Direct effects typically manifest earlier than secondary consequences. Studies have shown that changes in sphingolipid levels can occur rapidly, with reductions in plasma S1P observable as early as one week after deletion of upstream pathway components .

  • Substrate specificity assays: Directly measure the affinity of wild-type versus altered SPTSSB for different acyl-CoA substrates to confirm primary enzymatic changes. For example, mutations in SPTSSB have been demonstrated to increase affinity for C18 fatty acyl-CoA substrate by twofold .

  • Metabolic flux analysis: Use labeled precursors (such as [14C]labeled L-serine) to track the flow of metabolites through the sphingolipid pathway and identify where alterations first occur.

  • Gain- and loss-of-function experiments: Compare the effects of SPTSSB overexpression, knockdown, and mutation to identify consistent primary effects versus variable secondary consequences.

  • Rescue experiments: Attempt to rescue phenotypes by supplementing with specific sphingolipid species to determine which effects are directly due to the absence of certain metabolites versus downstream consequences.

  • Cross-tissue comparison: Analyze changes across multiple tissue types with different baseline sphingolipid profiles to identify consistent direct effects of SPTSSB alterations.

What are the implications of SPTSSB-mediated changes in sphingolipid composition for cellular protein homeostasis?

SPTSSB-mediated changes in sphingolipid composition have significant implications for cellular protein homeostasis:

  • Membrane protein trafficking: Alterations in membrane sphingolipid composition can disrupt the trafficking and localization of membrane proteins, as observed in mutant mouse models with elevated C20 LCBs .

  • Protein degradation pathways: Elevated C20 LCBs due to SPTSSB mutations correlate with the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins on membranes, suggesting impairment of protein degradation pathways, potentially including disruptions in proteasomal or lysosomal function .

  • Membrane microdomain disruption: Changes in sphingolipid chain length can alter the biophysical properties of membrane microdomains (lipid rafts), affecting the function of proteins that operate within these specialized membrane environments.

  • ER stress responses: Aberrant sphingolipid composition can trigger endoplasmic reticulum stress, as evidenced by the localization of SPT subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum and the potential disruption of ER membrane properties with altered sphingolipid profiles.

  • Axonal transport mechanisms: The axonal degeneration observed in mutant models suggests that sphingolipid alterations may impair protein transport along axons, which is essential for maintaining neuronal integrity and function .

These findings collectively indicate that precise regulation of sphingolipid composition, particularly LCB chain length, is critical for maintaining proper protein homeostasis in neural tissues.

What are the optimized protocols for measuring SPT activity in systems expressing recombinant SPTSSB?

The following optimized protocol is recommended for measuring SPT activity in systems expressing recombinant SPTSSB:

Reaction conditions:

  • Buffer: 50 mM HEPES (pH 8) containing 1 mM EDTA and 0.1% (w/v) sucrose monolaurate (SML)

  • L-serine: 5 mM for HPLC-based assay or 0.5 mM for radioactivity-based assay

  • Palmitoyl-CoA: 50 μM

  • Pyridoxal 5′-phosphate: 20 μM

Protocol improvements for enhanced sensitivity:

  • Use total cell lysate with 0.1% SML instead of microsomes, which allows working with smaller amounts of tissue or cells

  • Ensure reaction linearity for up to 60 minutes by adding 0.1% SML

  • Reduce or omit DTT to improve palmitoyl-CoA stability

  • For higher sensitivity, employ the HPLC-based detection method

HPLC-based detection method:

  • Convert 3-ketodihydrosphingosine (3KDS) chemically with sodium borohydride to sphinganine

  • Derivatize the resulting erythro- and threo-sphinganine with ortho-phthalaldehyde

  • Quantify by HPLC with fluorescence detection

This optimized protocol offers several advantages, including:

  • 20-fold lower detection limit compared to radioactive methods

  • Ability to use an internal standard for extraction normalization

  • Option to work with total cell lysate rather than microsomes

  • Improved linearity of the reaction

What strategies are effective for expressing and purifying active recombinant bovine SPTSSB?

Expression strategies:

  • Mammalian expression system:

    • Clone SPTSSB gene into a suitable expression vector (e.g., pcDNA3.1ZEO)

    • For optimal expression, include appropriate tags (such as HA-tag) for detection and purification

    • Co-transfect with other SPT subunits (SPTLC1, SPTLC2) in HEK293 cells

    • Select stable transfectants using appropriate antibiotics (e.g., 400 μg/ml geneticin or 200 μg/ml zeocin)

    • Change media every 4 days during selection

    • After 2 weeks, isolate and expand surviving colonies

    • Screen colonies by RT-PCR and western blot to identify highest expressing clones

  • Bacterial expression system:

    • For soluble SPT components, expression systems based on S. paucimobilis have proven effective

    • Modify the sequence to optimize codon usage for the host organism

    • Use strong inducible promoters to control expression

Purification approaches:

  • Affinity chromatography:

    • Use epitope tags (such as HA-tag) for immunoaffinity purification

    • For His-tagged constructs, employ nickel affinity chromatography

  • Size exclusion chromatography:

    • Further purify the protein based on molecular size to separate monomeric from aggregated forms

  • Ion exchange chromatography:

    • Use charge properties for additional purification if needed

Activity preservation considerations:

  • Include 0.1% SML in buffers to stabilize the enzyme

  • Avoid or minimize DTT, which can affect palmitoyl-CoA stability

  • Include 20 μM pyridoxal 5′-phosphate as a cofactor to maintain activity

How can researchers effectively generate and validate SPTSSB mutants to study structure-function relationships?

Generation of SPTSSB mutants:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis:

    • Design primers containing the desired mutation with ~15-20 nucleotides of flanking sequence on either side

    • Use overlap extension PCR techniques as demonstrated in previous studies:

      • First amplify the 5' portion with a forward primer containing restriction site (e.g., BamHI) and a reverse primer with the mutation

      • Amplify the 3' portion with a forward primer overlapping the mutation site and a reverse primer with appropriate restriction site

      • Combine the products in a final PCR with the outermost primers

    • Clone the mutated gene into an expression vector

  • CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis:

    • For in vivo studies, design guide RNAs targeting specific regions of the SPTSSB gene

    • Introduce specific mutations via homology-directed repair with a donor template

Validation approaches:

  • Sequence verification:

    • Confirm the presence of intended mutations and absence of unwanted mutations

  • Expression validation:

    • Verify expression levels by western blot using specific antibodies against SPTSSB or epitope tags

    • Confirm correct subcellular localization using immunofluorescence

  • Interaction analysis:

    • Assess binding to other SPT subunits via co-immunoprecipitation

    • Evaluate complex formation using size exclusion chromatography

  • Functional validation:

    • Measure enzyme activity using the optimized SPT activity assay described above

    • Determine substrate affinity changes for different acyl-CoA substrates

    • Analyze alterations in sphingolipid profiles, particularly changes in LCB chain length

Reference mutations:

  • The Stellar (Stl) mutation identified in mouse models provides a valuable reference point, as it has been demonstrated to increase affinity for C18 fatty acyl-CoA substrate by twofold and elevate C20 LCB production

What analytical techniques are most suitable for characterizing sphingolipid profiles in tissues expressing modified SPTSSB?

Sample preparation considerations:

  • Tissue extraction:

    • For neural tissues (brain, retina), rapid extraction is crucial to prevent post-mortem changes

    • For blood components (plasma, RBCs), proper fractionation is essential to distinguish compartment-specific changes

  • Extraction methods:

    • Use appropriate solvent systems (chloroform/methanol/water) with pH adjustment

    • Include internal standards for quantification

    • Consider tissue-specific optimization to account for lipid composition differences

Analytical techniques:

  • Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS):

    • Most sensitive and comprehensive approach for sphingolipid profiling

    • Enables quantification of specific species including:

      • Long chain bases (LCBs)

      • Phosphorylated sphingoid bases (S1P, dhS1P)

      • Ceramides with different fatty acid chain lengths

      • Sphingomyelins

  • HPLC with fluorescence detection:

    • For targeted analysis of specific sphingolipid classes

    • Requires derivatization with fluorescent tags (e.g., ortho-phthalaldehyde)

    • Offers excellent sensitivity (20-fold lower detection limit than radioactive methods)

  • Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC):

    • Useful for rapid screening of major sphingolipid classes

    • Can be combined with radioactive labeling for metabolic studies

Data analysis strategies:

  • Comprehensive profiling:

    • Analyze multiple sphingolipid classes simultaneously

    • Pay particular attention to alterations in LCB chain length distribution

    • Track both early pathway metabolites (LCBs) and downstream products (ceramides, sphingomyelins)

  • Time-course analysis:

    • Monitor changes over time to distinguish primary from secondary effects

    • Studies have shown rapid equilibration between different sphingolipid pools (e.g., plasma and RBC S1P levels)

  • Multi-compartment analysis:

    • Compare sphingolipid profiles across different tissues and compartments

    • This approach has revealed that endothelial SPTLC1 influences sphingolipid levels in circulation and peripheral organs

How do SPTSSB mutations impact neurological function and what are the implications for neurodegenerative disease research?

SPTSSB mutations can significantly impact neurological function through several mechanisms:

  • Aberrant membrane structures: The Stellar (Stl) mutation in SPTSSB leads to structural abnormalities in neural cell membranes, likely due to altered sphingolipid composition resulting from increased C20 LCB production .

  • Protein homeostasis disruption: Studies have demonstrated accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins on membranes in mutant models, indicating compromised protein degradation pathways that are critical for neural function .

  • Axonal degeneration: Perhaps most significantly, SPTSSB mutations can lead to axon degeneration, directly impairing neural connectivity and function .

These findings have several important implications for neurodegenerative disease research:

  • Novel pathogenic mechanism: The link between sphingolipid chain length and neurodegeneration represents a previously underappreciated mechanism that may contribute to various neurodegenerative conditions.

  • Biomarker potential: Alterations in sphingolipid profiles, particularly elevations in C20 LCBs, could serve as biomarkers for certain neurodegenerative processes.

  • Therapeutic targets: The SPT complex, including SPTSSB, represents a potential target for therapeutic interventions aimed at modulating sphingolipid metabolism in neurodegenerative contexts.

  • Model systems: SPTSSB mutant mouse models provide valuable tools for studying specific aspects of neurodegeneration, particularly those related to protein homeostasis and axonal integrity.

Researchers should consider examining SPTSSB expression and mutations in human neurodegenerative disease samples to determine whether similar mechanisms operate in conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or various forms of peripheral neuropathy.

What are the current technical challenges in studying SPTSSB function and how might they be addressed?

Current technical challenges and potential solutions:

  • Enzyme complex stability:

    • Challenge: The SPT complex includes multiple subunits (SPTLC1, SPTLC2/SPTLC3, and SPTssa/SPTssb) that must associate correctly for proper function.

    • Solution: Include 0.1% sucrose monolaurate (SML) in buffers to stabilize the complex. This has been shown to significantly improve SPT activity and provide better linearity in enzymatic assays .

  • Substrate stability:

    • Challenge: Palmitoyl-CoA, a key substrate, is susceptible to degradation by thioesterases and can be affected by reducing agents.

    • Solution: Reduce or omit DTT from reaction buffers, as it has been shown to negatively affect palmitoyl-CoA stability .

  • Tissue-specific expression:

    • Challenge: SPTSSB may have tissue-specific functions that are difficult to study in standard cell culture models.

    • Solution: Develop tissue-specific conditional knockout or knockin mouse models. Studies with endothelial-specific SPTLC1 knockout mice have successfully revealed tissue-specific roles .

  • Detection sensitivity:

    • Challenge: Traditional radioactive assays for SPT activity have limited sensitivity.

    • Solution: Implement HPLC-based detection methods, which offer a 20-fold lower detection limit compared to radioactive assays and allow for the use of internal standards to correct for variation in extraction .

  • Distinguishing direct from indirect effects:

    • Challenge: Changes in sphingolipid metabolism can have cascading effects, making it difficult to isolate specific SPTSSB functions.

    • Solution: Conduct time-course experiments to track the progression of changes. Studies have shown that alterations in sphingolipid levels can occur rapidly after genetic manipulation of pathway components .

  • Recombinant protein expression:

    • Challenge: Obtaining sufficient quantities of active recombinant SPTSSB for in vitro studies.

    • Solution: Optimize expression by using mammalian systems (HEK293) for full-length protein or bacterial systems (based on S. paucimobilis) for soluble variants .

How does bovine SPTSSB compare to its human ortholog, and what implications does this have for translational research?

While the search results do not provide direct comparative data between bovine and human SPTSSB, general principles of ortholog comparison and translational research considerations can be outlined:

Sequence and structural comparison:

  • Mammalian SPT components are generally well-conserved across species, suggesting that bovine SPTSSB likely shares significant sequence identity with its human ortholog.

  • Key functional domains involved in subunit interactions and substrate specificity would be expected to show the highest conservation.

Functional implications:

Translational research considerations:

  • Model validity: When using bovine SPTSSB in research with translational goals, researchers should verify that key functional characteristics are conserved in the human ortholog.

  • Species-specific assays: Develop and validate assays that can detect species-specific differences in SPTSSB function or activity.

  • Cellular context: Evaluate SPTSSB function in appropriate cellular contexts that recapitulate human pathophysiology.

  • Mutation analysis: Compare the effects of analogous mutations in bovine and human SPTSSB to establish cross-species conservation of structure-function relationships. The Stellar (Stl) mutation identified in mouse models provides a reference point for such comparative studies .

  • Therapeutic relevance: For drug development targeting the SPT complex, consider species-specific differences that might affect compound binding or efficacy.

Comparative SPT Activity Measurement Methods

ParameterRadioactive AssayHPLC-Based AssayNotes
Detection limitStandard20-fold lower than radioactiveHPLC offers significantly enhanced sensitivity
L-serine concentration0.5 mM5 mMHPLC method allows use of optimal substrate concentration
Sample preparationMicrosomes or total cell lysate with 0.1% SMLTotal cell lysate with 0.1% SMLAddition of SML inhibits interfering thioesterase activity
Reaction linearityUp to 60 min with 0.1% SMLUp to 60 min with 0.1% SMLImproved signal-to-noise ratio with longer incubation
DTT requirementReduced or omittedReduced or omittedImproves palmitoyl-CoA stability
Internal standard useLimited optionsCompatible with various standardsImproves quantification accuracy

Table based on methodological improvements described in search result

Effect of SPTSSB Mutation on Sphingolipid Production

Sphingolipid SpeciesWild TypeSPTSSB Stellar MutationFold ChangeTissue Affected
C20 Long Chain BasesBaselineSignificantly elevated~2× increaseBrain and eye
C18 Long Chain BasesBaselineVariable changes-Neural tissues
Sphingoid bases in circulationBaselineReduced-Plasma, RBC
Phosphorylated sphingoid bases (S1P, dhS1P)BaselineReduced-Plasma, RBC
Ceramides (C22-C26)BaselineReduced in circulation-RBC

Table synthesized from findings in search results and

Protocol Optimization for SPT Activity Assay

ParameterTraditional ApproachOptimized MethodPerformance Improvement
Sample preparationMicrosomes onlyTotal cell lysate with 0.1% SMLSimilar activity to microsomes with less starting material
Reaction buffer50 mM HEPES (pH 8) with EDTA50 mM HEPES (pH 8) with EDTA and 0.1% SMLImproved enzyme stability and linearity
DTT additionStandard additionReduced or omittedEnhanced palmitoyl-CoA stability
Detection methodRadioactiveHPLC-based20-fold lower detection limit
Reaction linearityVariableLinear up to 60 minBetter signal-to-noise ratio
L-serine concentrationLimited by radioactivity concernsCan use optimal 5 mMMore physiologically relevant conditions

Table based on methodological improvements described in search result

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.