Tyrosine recombinases are enzymes that facilitate site-specific recombination, a process crucial for DNA manipulation and chromosome maintenance in prokaryotes. These enzymes, including XerC and XerD in E. coli, work by cleaving DNA strands at specific sequences, facilitating strand exchange, and then rejoining the strands to form recombinant DNA products . The dif site, where these enzymes act, is typically located near the replication terminus region of the chromosome.
In E. coli, XerC and XerD are chromosomally encoded tyrosine recombinases that resolve chromosomal dimers by acting on the dif site. This process is essential for ensuring that each daughter cell receives a single copy of the chromosome during cell division . The synaptic complex formed by XerC, XerD, and the dif site is crucial for the recombination process.
While specific research on recombinant Bradyrhizobium japonicum Tyrosine Recombinase XerC is not readily available, studies on tyrosine recombinases in general highlight their conserved role across different bacterial species. For instance, in Archaea, XerA is the primary tyrosine recombinase involved in site-specific recombination, acting on a conserved dif sequence similar to that in bacteria .
Given the lack of specific data on recombinant Bradyrhizobium japonicum Tyrosine Recombinase XerC, we can compare the general characteristics of tyrosine recombinases across different species:
| Recombinase | Species | Function | Recombination Site |
|---|---|---|---|
| XerC | E. coli | Chromosome dimer resolution | dif (28 bp) |
| XerA | Archaea | Chromosome dimer resolution | dif (28 bp) |
| XerH | Helicobacter | Chromosome dimer resolution | difH |
Serre, M.C., et al. (2013). The Carboxy-Terminal Alpha N Helix of the Archaeal Xera Tyrosine Recombinase is a Molecular Switch to Control Site-Specific Recombination. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e63010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063010
Complete Genome Sequence of the Soybean Symbiont... (2011). PMC.
RSC Advances. (Accepted Manuscript).
Frontiers in Microbiology. (2017). Xer Site Specific Recombination: Double and Single Recombinase Systems. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00453
Sachs Lab. (2011). Bradyrhizobium japonicum.
Structure-activity relationships of new natural product-based diaryloxazoles... (2017). PMC.
KEGG: bja:blr0446
STRING: 224911.blr0446
Bradyrhizobium japonicum is a gram-negative soil bacterium known for its nitrogen-fixing symbiotic relationship with leguminous plants, particularly soybeans. The bacterium possesses tyrosine recombinases including XerC, which plays a crucial role in site-specific recombination systems. These recombinases are involved in chromosome segregation and the resolution of dimeric chromosomes that form during DNA replication.
The XerC recombinase specifically catalyzes the first strand exchange in the recombination process at the chromosomal dif site, forming a Holliday junction intermediate. This recombination mechanism is essential for chromosome maintenance and proper segregation during cell division .
The Xer site-specific recombination system in B. japonicum, like in other bacteria, involves two related tyrosine recombinases: XerC and XerD. These recombinases bind cooperatively to specific DNA sequences (recombination sites) and catalyze sequential strand exchanges.
Methodology for studying this system typically involves:
In vitro recombination assays using purified recombinases and DNA substrates
Analysis of recombination products using gel electrophoresis
Site-directed mutagenesis to identify key residues in the recombinases
The process begins with XerC and XerD binding to the left and right halves of the recombination site, respectively. XerC typically initiates the first strand exchange to form a Holliday junction intermediate, which is then resolved by XerD-mediated strand exchange or by cellular resolvases .
While no crystal structure specific to B. japonicum XerC has been published in the search results, insights can be drawn from related tyrosine recombinases. The first crystal structure of a full-length archaeal tyrosine recombinase, XerA from Pyrococcus abyssi, was determined at 3.0 Å resolution .
Key structural features of tyrosine recombinases typically include:
An N-terminal domain involved in protein-protein interactions
A C-terminal catalytic domain containing the active site
A catalytic tyrosine residue that forms a covalent 3'-phosphotyrosyl linkage with DNA during recombination
Alpha-helical structures that facilitate DNA binding and protein dimerization
In the case of XerA, the C-terminal αN helix was found to function as a molecular switch to control site-specific recombination, suggesting a similar mechanism might exist in other tyrosine recombinases including XerC .
Creating recombinant B. japonicum strains with modified XerC requires specialized techniques due to the bacterium's slow growth and high incidence of spontaneous antibiotic resistance. An effective methodological approach includes:
Design of recombinant constructs:
Clone the xerC gene with appropriate regulatory elements into a vector compatible with B. japonicum
For site-directed mutagenesis, use overlapping PCR or commercial kits to introduce specific mutations
Transformation methods:
Electroporation with specialized parameters for B. japonicum
Triparental mating using helper plasmids like pRK2013
Conjugation from E. coli donor strains
Selection strategy:
Verification of recombinants:
PCR amplification of the modified region
Sequencing to confirm the desired mutation
Functional assays to verify recombinase activity
This approach addresses the challenges posed by B. japonicum's characteristics while ensuring efficient generation of verified recombinant strains .
Purification and characterization of recombinant XerC from B. japonicum requires a systematic approach:
Protein Expression System Selection:
E. coli-based expression is typically preferred due to faster growth compared to native B. japonicum
Consider codon optimization for efficient expression
Use fusion tags (His6, MBP, GST) to facilitate purification and potentially enhance solubility
Purification Protocol:
Cell lysis: Sonication or French press in buffer containing protease inhibitors
Initial purification: Affinity chromatography using the fusion tag
Tag removal: Protease cleavage if the tag might interfere with activity
Further purification: Ion exchange and size exclusion chromatography
Quality control: SDS-PAGE and western blotting to verify purity and identity
Functional Characterization Methods:
DNA binding assays: Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with labeled dif sites
Recombination activity: In vitro recombination assays using suicide substrates and supercoiled plasmid DNA containing dif sites
Kinetic analysis: Measure reaction rates under various conditions
Structural studies: Circular dichroism for secondary structure analysis, potentially X-ray crystallography
Activity Verification:
Track recombination products using techniques such as gel electrophoresis, with particular attention to the formation of Holliday junction intermediates characteristic of XerC-initiated recombination .
Establishing optimal conditions for in vitro XerC recombinase activity assays requires careful optimization of multiple parameters:
Reaction Buffer Components:
pH: Typically 7.5-8.0
Ionic strength: 50-150 mM NaCl or KCl
Divalent cations: 5-10 mM MgCl₂
Reducing agent: 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol
Protein stabilizers: 5-10% glycerol
DNA Substrate Design:
Suicide substrates for unidirectional reactions
Supercoiled plasmid DNA containing dif sites for bidirectional reactions
Linear substrates with appropriate flanking sequences
Reaction Parameters:
Temperature: 25-37°C (considering B. japonicum's growth temperature preference)
Protein:DNA ratio: Typically 5-10:1 molar ratio
Incubation time: 30-120 minutes
Detection Methods:
Gel electrophoresis (agarose or polyacrylamide)
Fluorescence-based assays if using labeled substrates
Quantitative PCR for sensitive detection of recombination products
The assay can be adapted to study XerC-XerD cooperative binding by adding purified XerD protein and examining the sequential strand exchange process as demonstrated in studies with E. coli Xer recombinases .
The ExsFGH exporter system in B. japonicum has been identified as an RND family exporter involved in the efflux of ferric xenosiderophores from the periplasm. While direct interactions between ExsFGH and XerC/D recombination systems have not been explicitly described in the search results, an analysis of potential functional relationships can be made based on current understanding:
Cellular Stress Responses: Both systems may be involved in stress response mechanisms. ExsFGH exports potentially toxic compounds (siderophore-bound iron, certain antibiotics) , while XerC/D ensures proper chromosome segregation during stress conditions.
Methodological Approach to Study Interactions:
Generate double mutants (exsG xerC) and analyze phenotypes
Perform transcriptomic analysis to identify co-regulation patterns
Use fluorescence microscopy with tagged proteins to analyze co-localization
Conduct protein-protein interaction studies (bacterial two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation)
Research Questions to Address:
Does iron homeostasis disruption (via ExsFGH mutation) affect chromosome segregation?
Are both systems regulated by similar stress response pathways?
Does chromosomal integrity, maintained by XerC/D, affect membrane transporter function?
This represents an unexplored area where the intersection of iron homeostasis, antibiotic resistance, and DNA recombination/repair systems could reveal new bacterial stress response mechanisms .
Highly reiterated sequence-possessing (HRS) B. japonicum strains exhibit extensive genome rearrangements that could potentially relate to XerC recombinase activity. The search results reveal that:
HRS isolates possess significantly higher copy numbers of repeated sequences (RSα and RSβ) compared to normal isolates, as shown in the table below:
| Isolate Type | RSα copies (range) | RSβ copies (range) | Mean generation time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal isolates | 7.3 ± 1.2 (5-9) | 6.2 ± 2.5 (2-9) | 6.5 ± 0.7 |
| Niigata-type HRS | 128 ± 25 (86-175) | 33 ± 9 (22-45) | 10.3 ± 0.8 |
| Tokachi-type HRS | 21 ± 3 (17-23) | 44 ± 6 (35-51) | 10.0 ± 1.9 |
These HRS isolates also show shifts and duplications of nif- and hup-specific hybridization bands, suggesting genomic rearrangements .
Methodological approach to investigate XerC's role:
Comparative analysis:
Sequence the xerC gene from HRS and normal isolates to identify potential mutations
Analyze expression levels of xerC in both types of strains
Characterize potential XerC binding sites near repeated sequences
Functional studies:
Create xerC deletion or point mutants in normal B. japonicum and assess RS stability
Overexpress wild-type or mutant XerC in normal strains to see if it induces HRS-like phenotypes
Perform ChIP-seq to identify XerC binding sites genome-wide
Recombination activity tests:
Develop in vitro assays using RS elements as substrates for purified XerC
Analyze potential cooperative activity with transposases or other recombination systems
This research direction could elucidate whether XerC plays a role in generating or resolving the extensive genomic rearrangements observed in HRS isolates, potentially revealing new mechanisms of bacterial genome plasticity .
The dif site is the chromosomal target sequence where XerC and XerD bind to catalyze site-specific recombination. Variations in dif sequences across bacterial species lead to differences in recombinase binding affinity and recombination efficiency.
Methodological approach to investigate dif variants:
Sequence analysis and site design:
Identify the native B. japonicum dif sequence through bioinformatic analysis
Create a library of dif variants with systematic alterations in:
XerC and XerD binding sites
Central region length and sequence
Flanking sequences
Binding affinity determination:
Perform quantitative EMSA with purified XerC and dif variants
Use isothermal titration calorimetry or surface plasmon resonance for precise Kd measurements
Compare cooperative binding with XerD across different variants
Recombination efficiency analysis:
Conduct in vitro recombination assays with various dif variants
Measure reaction kinetics and product formation
Develop an in vivo recombination assay using a reporter system in B. japonicum
Structural studies:
Model XerC-dif interactions based on known crystal structures
Identify key contact points between XerC and DNA
Predict effects of sequence variations on binding and catalysis
Expected results would include identification of critical nucleotides within the dif site that determine specificity for B. japonicum XerC, potentially revealing species-specific adaptations in the recombination system. This information would be valuable for understanding the evolution of site-specific recombination systems and could be applied to develop improved genetic tools for B. japonicum manipulation .
When encountering contradictory results in XerC recombination activity assays, a systematic troubleshooting approach should be employed:
Common Sources of Contradictions and Solutions:
Protein Quality Issues
Verify protein purity by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
Assess protein folding via circular dichroism
Check for inhibitory contaminants or aggregation
Solution: Optimize purification protocol or prepare fresh protein
Substrate Variability
Confirm substrate sequence and structure
Evaluate DNA preparation method effects (supercoiling, nicking)
Test multiple substrate preparations
Solution: Standardize DNA preparation methods and quality control
Reaction Condition Inconsistencies
Systematically vary buffer components, pH, and salt concentration
Control temperature fluctuations
Ensure consistent protein:DNA ratios
Solution: Establish a detailed standard operating procedure
Detection Method Limitations
Compare multiple detection techniques
Include appropriate controls for each detection method
Verify the sensitivity range of the assay
Solution: Validate detection methods with known standards
Methodological Decision Tree:
Verify reagent quality and preparation consistency
Test activity under multiple buffer conditions
Compare results from different detection methods
Seek collaborator verification with different protein preparations
Consider potential protein-protein interactions that might affect activity
When analyzing contradictory data from XerC activity assays, researchers should also consider that XerC typically requires interaction with XerD for full functionality in the natural system, and the absence of this partner could explain variations in observed activity .
Discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo XerC recombination results are common and require careful interpretation:
Common Discrepancies and Their Potential Causes:
| Observation | Potential Causes | Investigation Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Active in vitro, inactive in vivo | Improper expression/folding in vivo | Western blot, RT-PCR |
| Missing cofactors or partners | Co-immunoprecipitation, protein complex analysis | |
| Cellular regulation mechanisms | Promoter analysis, regulatory protein identification | |
| Inactive in vitro, active in vivo | Suboptimal in vitro conditions | Systematic buffer optimization |
| Requirement for additional factors | Cell extract supplementation experiments | |
| Post-translational modifications | Mass spectrometry analysis | |
| Different substrate specificity | Chromatin structure effects | Nucleosome reconstitution assays |
| Accessory proteins in vivo | ChIP-seq for protein binding partners | |
| Cellular DNA topology differences | Topology modulation in vitro |
Methodological Approach to Resolve Discrepancies:
Bridge the gap between systems:
Add cellular extracts to in vitro reactions
Create semi-in vivo systems (permeabilized cells)
Purify protein directly from B. japonicum rather than recombinant systems
Identify missing components:
Conduct fractionation of cell extracts to identify essential cofactors
Perform proteomics on XerC-associated proteins in vivo
Examine post-translational modifications present in vivo
Adjust experimental design:
Modify in vitro conditions to better mimic cellular environment
Design reporter systems for more sensitive in vivo detection
Consider temporal aspects of recombination in vivo
When interpreting differences, remember that in vivo systems include factors such as DNA supercoiling, macromolecular crowding, and protein-protein interactions that may be absent in simplified in vitro assays. Additionally, the sequential action of XerC and XerD may depend on regulatory mechanisms present only in the cellular context .
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for advancing our understanding of XerC-mediated recombination in B. japonicum:
CRISPR-Cas Systems for Precise Genome Editing:
Create precise mutations in xerC and partner genes
Engineer reporter systems at recombination sites
Develop inducible xerC expression systems for temporal studies
Single-Molecule Techniques:
Single-molecule FRET to observe XerC-DNA interactions in real-time
Optical tweezers to measure forces during recombination
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize recombination complexes in vivo
Structural Biology Advances:
Cryo-electron microscopy for XerC-XerD-DNA complexes
Time-resolved X-ray crystallography to capture recombination intermediates
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics
Systems Biology Approaches:
Multi-omics integration to understand XerC regulation networks
Machine learning to identify patterns in recombination site selection
Synthetic biology to create minimal recombination systems
Methodological Implementation Strategy:
Establish CRISPR-Cas9 editing protocols optimized for B. japonicum
Develop fluorescent tagging systems compatible with slow-growing bacteria
Create high-throughput assays for recombination efficiency
Apply computational modeling to predict recombination outcomes
These technologies would allow researchers to address fundamental questions about the mechanistic details of XerC-mediated recombination, its regulation in response to environmental factors, and its role in genome stability maintenance .
Understanding the species-specific adaptations of XerC in B. japonicum compared to model organisms like E. coli requires a comparative analysis approach:
Potential Differences and Research Approaches:
Sequence and Structural Variations
Conduct comparative sequence analysis between B. japonicum XerC and E. coli XerC
Model structural differences based on conserved domains
Express both proteins and compare biochemical properties
Perform domain swapping experiments to identify functional differences
Substrate Specificity
Compare dif site sequences between B. japonicum and E. coli
Test cross-species recombination with heterologous dif sites
Identify species-specific accessory sequences around dif
Map the minimal and optimal substrate requirements for each
Regulation and Interaction Networks
Identify potential B. japonicum-specific interaction partners
Compare expression patterns and regulation mechanisms
Investigate co-evolution with replication systems
Explore potential links to symbiotic gene regions
Functional Context
Examine XerC function in the context of B. japonicum's slower growth rate
Investigate potential connections to nitrogen fixation and symbiosis
Assess impacts on genome stability in symbiotic versus free-living states
Explore role in managing the larger B. japonicum genome
Given that B. japonicum has a substantially different lifestyle (nitrogen-fixing symbiont with slow growth) compared to E. coli (fast-growing enteric bacterium), XerC may have evolved specific adaptations related to chromosome maintenance during prolonged cell cycles or environmental stresses associated with symbiosis .
Engineered XerC recombinases offer promising applications in synthetic biology approaches for B. japonicum, particularly in agricultural and environmental contexts:
Genetic Tool Development:
Creation of site-specific integration systems for stable gene insertion
Development of recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) for modular genetic engineering
Design of genetic switches based on inducible recombination
Implementation of genome-scale engineering via multiplexed recombination sites
Agricultural Applications:
Engineering improved nitrogen fixation capacity through stable genetic modifications
Creating biosensor strains that respond to specific soil conditions
Developing conditional symbiosis traits activated by plant signals
Engineering controlled persistence in agricultural soils
Environmental Monitoring:
Designing recombination-based memory systems for environmental exposure recording
Creating strains with recombination-activated reporter systems
Developing bioremediation capabilities through stable pathway integration
Methodological Approach to Develop These Applications:
Characterize and optimize native XerC-dif recombination systems in B. japonicum
Engineer XerC variants with altered specificity through directed evolution
Develop orthogonal recombination systems to enable multiple independent recombination events
Create standardized genetic parts based on XerC recombination for B. japonicum synthetic biology
Potential Modifications to XerC:
Alter substrate specificity through targeted mutations
Create split-recombinase systems for inducible activity
Develop fusion proteins with additional functional domains
Engineer variants with enhanced catalytic properties
These applications would leverage the natural precision of site-specific recombination while addressing the specific challenges of working with B. japonicum, such as its slow growth and specialized symbiotic lifestyle .
When publishing research on recombinant B. japonicum XerC, researchers should adhere to the following best practices to ensure reproducibility, clarity, and impact:
Experimental Documentation:
Provide complete sequence information for all constructs
Include detailed methods for protein expression and purification
Specify exact buffer compositions and reaction conditions
Report all controls performed and their outcomes
Document growth conditions precisely, considering B. japonicum's slow growth
Data Presentation:
Include representative images of experimental results
Provide quantitative data with appropriate statistical analysis
Present both positive and negative results to avoid publication bias
Include sufficient replicates (biological and technical)
Compare results to appropriate reference strains or proteins
Appropriate Controls:
Include wild-type XerC alongside engineered variants
Use both positive controls (known functional XerC from model organisms) and negative controls
Perform enzymatic dead mutants (e.g., tyrosine to phenylalanine catalytic mutants)
Validate antibodies and reagents used
Contextual Information:
Discuss findings in relation to other tyrosine recombinases
Address potential implications for B. japonicum biology
Consider evolutionary aspects of recombination systems
Relate to broader bacterial physiology where appropriate
Data Sharing:
Deposit sequences in GenBank or other appropriate databases
Share plasmids through repositories like Addgene
Provide detailed protocols via protocols.io or similar platforms
Consider sharing raw data through appropriate repositories
Following these practices will enhance the utility of published work and facilitate replication and extension by other researchers in the field .
Researchers working with B. japonicum XerC should be familiar with the following reference materials and resources:
Key Literature:
Research papers on tyrosine recombinases, particularly those focusing on XerC/D systems in proteobacteria
Studies on B. japonicum genetics and genome organization
Literature on site-specific recombination mechanisms
Publications on protein expression and purification from slow-growing bacteria
Genetic Resources:
The complete genome sequence of B. japonicum strain USDA6T and USDA110
Annotated XerC/D genes and dif sites in related organisms
Plasmid vectors optimized for B. japonicum
Expression systems compatible with B. japonicum
Methodological Protocols:
Rapid methods for selection of recombinant site-directed mutants of B. japonicum
Techniques for protein purification from recombinant systems
Assays for tyrosine recombinase activity
DNA binding assays specific for site-specific recombinases
Bioinformatic Tools:
Programs for identification of dif sites in bacterial genomes
Software for prediction of protein structure and function
Tools for comparative genomic analysis of recombination systems
Databases of bacterial tyrosine recombinases
Research Communities and Organizations:
International Society for Plasmid Biology and other Mobile Genetic Elements
Research groups specializing in bacterial recombination systems
Agricultural research institutes working on rhizobial symbiosis
Synthetic biology consortia developing tools for non-model organisms