Recombinant Brugia pahangi 60S ribosomal protein L15

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction

Recombinant Brugia pahangi 60S ribosomal protein L15 (RPL15) is a genetically engineered protein derived from the parasitic nematode Brugia pahangi, a causative agent of lymphatic filariasis. This protein is a component of the 60S ribosomal subunit and plays a critical role in ribosome assembly and protein synthesis. Recombinant production enables its use in functional studies, diagnostic applications, and therapeutic research .

Production and Purification

ParameterDetail
Host SystemYeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
TagN-terminal His tag
Purity>90% (verified via SDS-PAGE and chromatography)
Expression VectorCustom yeast expression vector optimized for ribosomal protein yields
Post-Translational ModificationsGlycosylation, phosphorylation (inferred from yeast expression)

This production method ensures eukaryotic post-translational modifications, enhancing structural fidelity .

Applications in Research

Recombinant Brugia pahangi RPL15 is primarily used in:

  1. ELISA Development: Detecting filarial infections via antibody-antigen interactions .

  2. Structural Studies: Investigating ribosome assembly mechanisms in parasitic nematodes.

  3. Vaccine Research: Screening immunogenic targets for lymphatic filariasis .

Comparative Analysis of Recombinant RPL15 Variants

SpeciesHost SystemTagApplicationKey Reference
Brugia pahangiYeastHis tagELISA, diagnostics
Homo sapiensE. coliGST tagCancer research
Spinacia oleraceaYeastHis tagPlant ribosome studies

Challenges and Considerations

  • Sequence Ambiguity: The unresolved residue ("X") in the Brugia pahangi RPL15 sequence may affect antibody binding or functional assays .

  • Species-Specificity: Cross-reactivity with human RPL15 requires validation for diagnostic accuracy .

  • Parasite Adaptation: Brugia spp. RPL15 may interact with Wolbachia endosymbionts, complicating therapeutic targeting .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format unless you specify a preference when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default; dry ice shipping is available for an extra fee upon request.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
; 60S ribosomal protein L15; Fragment
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
2-71
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Brugia pahangi (Filarial nematode worm)
Target Protein Sequence
GAYRYMQEL WRKKKSETMR YLLRIRCWQY RQLTAIHRVS RPTRPEKARR LGYLSNEGYI IYRVRVLRGG R
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Brugia pahangi and how does it relate to human filarial pathogens?

Brugia pahangi is a filarial nematode that primarily infects cats and other animals but shares significant biological similarity with the human pathogen Brugia malayi. B. pahangi has a complex life cycle, involving mosquito vectors and mammalian hosts. The parasite exists as microfilariae in the bloodstream and develops through larval stages before establishing as adults in the lymphatics. B. pahangi is subperiodic, meaning microfilariae can be found in blood samples taken at any time of day, unlike the nocturnally periodic B. malayi . This characteristic makes B. pahangi a useful laboratory model for studying lymphatic filariasis, as it provides greater flexibility in experimental design. B. pahangi can be distinguished from B. malayi through various morphological features, including different patterns of acid phosphatase activity - B. pahangi shows diffuse staining throughout the microfilaria, while B. malayi shows two distinct foci at the excretory and anal pores .

What methods are used to isolate Brugia pahangi for protein research?

Researchers typically obtain B. pahangi parasites through laboratory life cycle maintenance using mosquito vectors and susceptible mammalian hosts. Third-stage larvae (L3) can be recovered from infected mosquitoes through Baermannization techniques, as described in published protocols . For experimental infections, motile L3 are washed in RPMI 1640 medium containing antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin) and antifungals (amphotericin B) before use . Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) serve as permissive hosts for B. pahangi and are commonly used for in vivo studies. Parasites can be recovered from infected animals by careful dissection of tissues, including lymphatic vessels, lymph nodes, and spermatic cord lymphatics, followed by soaking in phosphate-buffered saline . For protein studies, parasites are typically homogenized in appropriate buffers containing protease inhibitors to preserve protein integrity.

How are Brugia species differentiated in laboratory settings?

Accurate species identification is crucial when working with Brugia parasites. Microscopic examination remains a standard method, with microfilariae of B. pahangi distinguishable by their size (246-280 μm in length, 5-6 μm in width), blunt rounded head, and tapered tail . The acid phosphatase staining pattern provides a reliable method for distinguishing B. pahangi from B. malayi and other Brugia species, as each shows characteristic patterns: B. pahangi exhibits diffuse staining throughout the microfilaria, B. malayi shows localized staining at the excretory pore and anal pore, and B. patei shows staining in the cephalic vesicle, excretory pore, and tail region . For molecular identification, nucleic acid amplification tests targeting species-specific DNA sequences offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity compared to morphological methods. These techniques are particularly valuable when working with recombinant proteins to confirm the source organism.

What expression systems are most suitable for recombinant Brugia pahangi proteins?

For immunological studies, the choice of expression system can significantly impact the conformational epitopes preserved in the recombinant protein. Researchers studying Brugia antigens often use tagged recombinant proteins; for example, studies on Brugia malayi have successfully used recombinant Bm14 protein for ELISA-based antibody detection . Similar approaches could be applied to B. pahangi ribosomal proteins, potentially utilizing purification tags that can be cleaved post-purification to maintain native protein structure.

What are the challenges in purifying functional Brugia ribosomal proteins?

Purification of functional Brugia ribosomal proteins presents several challenges, including maintaining protein solubility, preserving native conformation, and removing contaminating bacterial components when using prokaryotic expression systems. Standard protocols often involve affinity chromatography using tags such as poly-histidine, followed by size exclusion chromatography.

Particular attention must be paid to buffer conditions during purification, as ribosomal proteins tend to form complexes with nucleic acids. Including nucleases in lysis buffers and using high-salt washes during purification can help minimize nucleic acid contamination. Additionally, ribosomal proteins often require specific ionic conditions to maintain their folded state, necessitating careful optimization of buffer composition throughout the purification process. Validation of protein functionality through binding assays or activity tests specific to ribosomal protein L15 is essential to confirm that the recombinant protein retains its native properties.

How can researchers optimize experimental design for studying Brugia pahangi migration in host models?

Studying B. pahangi migration requires careful experimental design to track parasites and measure host responses accurately. Based on established protocols, intradermal injection of L3 stage larvae into the hind limb of gerbils allows for controlled infection and subsequent tracking of parasite migration . Researchers should consider the following methodological aspects:

  • Larval preparation: L3 should be recovered from infected mosquitoes via Baermannization, washed in antibiotic-containing media, and examined for motility before use .

  • Infection protocol: Standardized infections using 100 L3 in 50 μl RPMI medium delivered intradermally via 28-gauge needle ensures reproducibility .

  • Temporal analysis: Based on migration patterns documented in previous studies, key timepoints for analysis include 3h, 24h, 72h, 7 days, and 28 days post-infection to capture the complete migration pattern .

  • Tissue collection: Systematic dissection and examination of tissues should include the infection site, lymph nodes (popliteal, inguinal, subinguinal, ileac, and renal), lymphatic vessels, heart, lungs, testicles, and spermatic cord lymphatics .

  • Parasite recovery techniques: Tissues should be examined twice after soaking in phosphate-buffered saline for at least 1 hour .

This approach has revealed that B. pahangi L3 migrate rapidly from the infection site, with 96.3% recovered from the infection site at 3 hours, but only 53.2% remaining at 24 hours, demonstrating the speed of parasite dissemination through host tissues . By 28 days post-infection, most parasites (35.7%) are established in the spermatic cord lymphatics , as shown in the table below:

TissueLarval recovery at time postinfection:
3 h
Mean ± SD
Hind limb-skin muscle33.8 ± 18.5
PLN0.8 ± 0.9
Spermatic cord0

What methodologies are most effective for studying immune responses to Brugia pahangi ribosomal proteins?

When investigating immune responses to B. pahangi ribosomal proteins, researchers should implement complementary approaches to characterize both cellular and humoral immunity:

  • Cytokine profiling: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of cytokine mRNA expression in tissues provides insight into the local immune environment. Studies have shown that B. pahangi infection induces early peaks of IL-6 and TNF-α at 3 hours post-infection, with a later shift to IL-4 dominance by 28 days, indicating a transition from acute inflammation to a Th2-polarized response .

  • Antibody detection: For measuring antifilarial antibodies, indirect ELISA using recombinant proteins as capture antigens is effective. While commercial tests like the Brugia Rapid test (using BmR1 antigen) exist, in-house ELISAs using recombinant proteins such as Bm14 have been successfully implemented . Similar approaches could be adapted for studying antibody responses to recombinant B. pahangi 60S ribosomal protein L15.

  • Cellular response assays: Flow cytometry analysis of cells isolated from infected tissues can identify responding immune cell populations. Histological examination has shown that neutrophils are the predominant early responders to migrating L3 in the dermis and muscle near the injection site at 3-24 hours post-infection .

  • Cross-reactivity testing: When evaluating the specificity of immune responses, it's important to test for cross-reactivity with other filarial species. Researchers should include control antigens from related species (B. malayi, Wuchereria bancrofti) and unrelated nematodes to determine the specificity of antibody or cellular responses.

  • Longitudinal sampling: To capture the dynamic nature of the immune response, sampling at multiple timepoints is essential, with 3h, 24h, 7 days, and 28 days representing key stages in the evolution of the host response from acute inflammation to established Th2 polarization .

How can structural biology approaches enhance our understanding of Brugia pahangi 60S ribosomal protein L15?

Structural studies of B. pahangi 60S ribosomal protein L15 can provide valuable insights into its function and potential as a diagnostic or therapeutic target. Researchers should consider these methodological approaches:

  • Homology modeling: When crystallographic structures are unavailable, homology modeling using structures of ribosomal protein L15 from related organisms can predict the three-dimensional structure. This approach leverages the evolutionary conservation of ribosomal proteins to generate reliable structural models.

  • X-ray crystallography: For definitive structural determination, researchers should optimize conditions for protein crystallization, which typically requires highly pure, monodisperse protein samples. Screening various buffer conditions, precipitants, and temperatures is necessary to identify crystallization conditions.

  • Cryo-electron microscopy: This technique has revolutionized structural biology of ribosomes and their components, allowing visualization of ribosomal proteins in their native complex without the need for crystallization. Sample preparation involves vitrification of purified ribosomes or subunits on specialized grids.

  • Protein-protein interaction studies: To understand the functional context of L15 within the ribosome, techniques such as cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry can identify interaction partners. Pull-down assays using tagged recombinant L15 can also help elucidate its binding partners within the ribosomal complex.

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Once a structural model is established, computational approaches can simulate the dynamic behavior of the protein under various conditions, including interactions with potential drug compounds or antibodies.

These structural approaches can identify unique features of B. pahangi L15 that might distinguish it from host ribosomal proteins, potentially revealing epitopes for specific antibody recognition or unique binding pockets for selective drug targeting.

What are the key considerations when developing species-specific diagnostic assays based on Brugia pahangi ribosomal proteins?

Developing diagnostic assays based on B. pahangi ribosomal proteins requires careful consideration of several factors to ensure specificity, sensitivity, and field applicability:

  • Epitope selection: Researchers should identify regions of the 60S ribosomal protein L15 that are unique to B. pahangi and not conserved in other filarial species or the host. Bioinformatic analysis comparing sequences across species can identify candidate epitopes, which should be experimentally validated.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Comprehensive testing against other Brugia species (B. malayi, B. timori), related filariae (Wuchereria bancrofti, Loa loa), and unrelated nematodes is essential to confirm specificity. This is particularly important given the antigenic similarities between B. pahangi and B. malayi .

  • Assay format selection: For field applications, lateral flow assays or simplified ELISA formats may be more practical than complex laboratory tests. The Brugia Rapid test for B. malayi provides a model for such development, though quality control issues have been reported .

  • Sample type optimization: Determining the optimal sample type (serum, whole blood, or other body fluids) and processing requirements is crucial for assay development. For serological assays, researchers need to evaluate the persistence of antibody responses, as this affects the test's ability to distinguish active from past infections.

  • Validation in endemic settings: Field validation in areas where multiple filarial species coexist is necessary to assess real-world performance. This should include testing samples from patients with confirmed infections of various filarial and non-filarial parasites to establish positive and negative predictive values.

Experience with existing diagnostic tests for Brugia infections, such as the indirect ELISA using recombinant Bm14 protein as the antigen , provides valuable lessons for new assay development.

How can transcriptomic and proteomic approaches enhance research on Brugia pahangi ribosomal proteins?

Integrating transcriptomic and proteomic approaches provides comprehensive insights into the biology of B. pahangi ribosomal proteins across the parasite's life cycle:

  • Stage-specific expression analysis: RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) across different life stages (microfilariae, L3, L4, adult males, adult females) can identify when 60S ribosomal protein L15 is most highly expressed, potentially indicating stages where it plays critical roles.

  • Differential expression during host transition: Comparing expression levels between mosquito-derived L3 and mammalian host-adapted parasites can reveal adaptations in the protein synthesis machinery during this critical transition, which occurs rapidly as parasites migrate from the infection site .

  • Post-translational modification mapping: Mass spectrometry-based proteomic approaches can identify post-translational modifications of ribosomal proteins that may regulate their function. These modifications may differ between life stages or in response to environmental stressors.

  • Ribosome profiling: This technique provides insight into active translation by sequencing ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Applied to B. pahangi, it could reveal how translation regulation changes during development and host adaptation.

  • Protein-protein interaction networks: Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS) using antibodies against L15 can identify interaction partners specific to different parasite stages, potentially revealing unique aspects of B. pahangi ribosome function.

These -omics approaches provide context for understanding the role of 60S ribosomal protein L15 within the parasite's biology and can guide the development of targeted interventions or diagnostic applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.