Recombinant Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Baizongia pistaciae 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Before opening, briefly centrifuge the vial to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a guideline for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.

The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.

Synonyms
rpmI; bbp_121; 50S ribosomal protein L35
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-65
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Baizongia pistaciae (strain Bp)
Target Names
rpmI
Target Protein Sequence
MPKIKTLRSA AKRFKKTESG KFKRKQAHLR HILTKKNTHY KRHLRSKVMI SKKDIQKVRL FLPYL
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Buchnera aphidicola and why is it significant in research contexts?

Buchnera aphidicola is a prokaryotic endosymbiont found in specialized cells (bacteriocytes) of aphids. It plays a critical role in the aphid's nutrition by providing essential amino acids that are lacking in the aphid's diet of plant sap. This symbiotic relationship represents one of the most well-studied examples of obligate endosymbiosis in insects. The significance of Buchnera in research stems from its unique evolutionary trajectory, characterized by extreme genome reduction while maintaining essential metabolic pathways for amino acid supplementation. This makes it an excellent model system for studying genome evolution, host-symbiont interactions, and the biological mechanisms of obligate symbiosis. The specialized nature of this relationship is evidenced by the retention of genes for peptidoglycan synthesis in pea aphid Buchnera, while Buchnera of other aphid species partially or completely lack these genes .

What are the structural characteristics of 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) in Buchnera aphidicola?

The 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) in Buchnera aphidicola is a component of the large subunit of the bacterial ribosome. The protein maintains the core structural elements essential for ribosomal assembly and function despite the genome reduction characteristic of endosymbionts. In Buchnera, the ribosomal proteins are particularly important given the unusual translation context - many Buchnera genes are preceded by poor ribosome-binding sites, requiring specialized adaptations in the translation machinery . The rpmI protein works in concert with other ribosomal proteins to facilitate proper ribosome assembly and function. When produced as a recombinant protein, rpmI typically has high purity (>90%) and is typically stored in liquid form containing glycerol .

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant Buchnera aphidicola ribosomal proteins?

For the production of recombinant Buchnera aphidicola ribosomal proteins including rpmI, several expression systems have proven effective, each with specific advantages depending on research objectives:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsTypical Yield
E. coliHigh yield, rapid growth, cost-effectivePotential folding issues with complex proteins5-15 mg/L culture
YeastBetter post-translational modificationsSlower growth than E. coli2-10 mg/L culture
BaculovirusSuperior folding for complex proteinsMore technically demanding1-5 mg/L culture
Mammalian CellBest for highly complex proteinsHighest cost, lowest yield0.5-2 mg/L culture

E. coli expression systems are most commonly employed for Buchnera ribosomal proteins due to their prokaryotic origin, which facilitates proper folding in the bacterial environment. The host systems reported for recombinant Buchnera ribosomal proteins include "E. coli or Yeast or Baculovirus or Mammalian Cell" as noted in commercial preparations . When using E. coli systems, codon optimization may be necessary to account for the AT-rich genome of Buchnera. For functional studies requiring proper protein folding and activity, it's essential to validate the structural integrity of the recombinant protein through circular dichroism or limited proteolysis assays.

What purification strategies yield optimal results for recombinant rpmI?

Purification of recombinant 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) from Buchnera aphidicola typically employs a multi-step chromatography approach to achieve high purity (>90%) as observed in commercial preparations . The following protocol has proven effective:

  • Initial Capture: Affinity chromatography using His-tag or other fusion tags

  • Intermediate Purification: Ion exchange chromatography (typically cation exchange due to the basic nature of many ribosomal proteins)

  • Polishing Step: Size exclusion chromatography for final purification and buffer exchange

For researchers experiencing protein solubility issues, the addition of mild detergents or arginine in the purification buffers can improve yield without compromising structure. When higher purity is required for structural studies or specific functional assays, additional steps such as hydrophobic interaction chromatography may be incorporated. It's critical to include protease inhibitors throughout the purification process and to maintain temperature control to prevent protein degradation.

How should recombinant Buchnera aphidicola 50S ribosomal protein L35 be stored to maintain activity?

Optimal storage conditions for recombinant Buchnera aphidicola 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) are crucial for maintaining protein stability and activity. The recommended storage protocol based on commercial preparations is:

  • Short-term storage (up to one week): Store working aliquots at 4°C

  • Medium-term storage: Store at -20°C

  • Long-term storage: Store at -20°C or -80°C in small aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

The protein is typically stored in a liquid formulation containing glycerol, which acts as a cryoprotectant . The addition of 10-15% glycerol helps prevent freezing damage to protein structure. It is strongly recommended to avoid repeated freezing and thawing, as this significantly reduces protein activity and stability . For experiments requiring absolute retention of activity, lyophilization may be considered as an alternative storage method, though refolding conditions must be carefully optimized upon reconstitution.

How can recombinant rpmI be used to study aphid-Buchnera symbiosis at the molecular level?

Recombinant 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) serves as a valuable tool for investigating the molecular basis of aphid-Buchnera symbiosis through several sophisticated experimental approaches:

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Recombinant rpmI can be used to identify interactions with both bacterial and host proteins, potentially revealing novel aspects of the symbiotic interface. Pull-down assays with tagged rpmI can capture interaction partners from bacteriocyte lysates.

  • Structural Basis of Adaptation: Crystallography or cryo-EM studies of recombinant rpmI can reveal structural adaptations specific to the endosymbiotic lifestyle. These studies are particularly relevant given the unusual translation environment in Buchnera, where many genes lack strong ribosome binding sites .

  • Immunolocalization Experiments: Antibodies raised against recombinant rpmI can be used to track ribosome distribution within bacteriocytes, providing insights into the spatial organization of protein synthesis in the symbiotic system.

  • Ribosome Assembly Studies: Recombinant rpmI can be employed in in vitro ribosome assembly experiments to understand the specific contributions of this protein to ribosome structure and function in the context of genome reduction.

  • Translation Efficiency Analysis: Given the poor ribosome-binding sites preceding many Buchnera genes , recombinant rpmI can be used in reconstituted translation systems to assess its role in translation efficiency under these unusual conditions.

These approaches collectively contribute to our understanding of how protein synthesis machinery has adapted to the endosymbiotic lifestyle and how ribosomal proteins like rpmI may contribute to the maintenance of this obligate symbiosis.

What is known about the genome context and expression patterns of rpmI in Buchnera aphidicola?

The genomic context of rpmI in Buchnera aphidicola reveals important aspects of gene organization and expression in this endosymbiont. Ribosomal protein genes in Buchnera are distributed throughout the genome and often show conservation of gene order with related bacteria, despite extensive genome reduction. Analysis of available genomic data indicates that ribosomal protein genes, including those encoding 50S subunit components, are retained even in highly reduced Buchnera genomes, underscoring their essential function.

How does peptidoglycan synthesis in Buchnera relate to ribosomal protein function?

The relationship between peptidoglycan (PGN) synthesis and ribosomal protein function in Buchnera aphidicola represents an interesting intersection of cellular processes in this endosymbiont. Despite genome reduction, pea aphid Buchnera retains genes for PGN synthesis, while Buchnera from other aphid species partially or completely lack these genes . This variable retention pattern contrasts with the consistent retention of ribosomal protein genes across Buchnera lineages.

The maintenance of both translation machinery (including rpmI) and PGN synthesis capabilities in some Buchnera lineages suggests a functional integration of these processes in maintaining endosymbiont cellular integrity. Ribosomal proteins ensure proper protein synthesis, including the enzymes required for PGN synthesis, while PGN contributes to cellular structure and protection. Cell-wall labeling studies using d-alanine probes have confirmed that both Macrosiphini and Aphidini Buchnera retain functional PGN synthesis despite gene losses in some lineages .

Interestingly, the coincident loss of host horizontally-transferred gene amiD and symbiont murCEF in tribe Aphidini (contrasting with their retention in tribe Macrosiphini) suggests either functional linkage between host and symbiont genes or compensatory adaptations that preserve PGN synthesis despite the loss of genes typically considered essential for this pathway . This demonstrates the complex co-evolutionary dynamics between host and symbiont genomes in maintaining essential cellular functions.

What are the common challenges in expressing recombinant Buchnera ribosomal proteins?

Researchers working with recombinant Buchnera aphidicola ribosomal proteins face several challenges that require specific technical solutions:

ChallengePotential CausesRecommended Solutions
Low expression yieldAT-rich codon bias; toxicity to hostCodon optimization; use of inducible promoters; lower growth temperature
Protein insolubilityImproper folding; hydrophobic interactionsFusion with solubility tags (MBP, SUMO); expression at lower temperatures (16-20°C)
Protein degradationProteolytic activity in hostUse of protease-deficient strains; addition of protease inhibitors
Co-purification contaminantsNon-specific binding to purification resinIncreased washing stringency; tandem purification tags
Loss of activityImproper folding or disulfide formationInclusion of molecular chaperones; oxidized/reduced glutathione buffer

The expression of functional recombinant ribosomal proteins from endosymbionts presents unique challenges due to their adaptation to the specialized intracellular environment. Using E. coli as an expression host typically yields the best results, but careful optimization of induction conditions is essential. For particularly difficult-to-express proteins, specialized expression strains like BL21(DE3)pLysS or C41/C43 may provide better results by reducing toxicity effects. When traditional approaches fail, in vitro translation systems might offer an alternative production method for highly toxic or unstable ribosomal proteins.

How can researchers validate the proper folding and function of recombinant rpmI?

Validating the proper folding and function of recombinant 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) from Buchnera aphidicola is critical for ensuring experimental validity. Multiple complementary approaches should be employed:

  • Structural Validation:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements

    • Limited proteolysis to probe structural integrity

    • Thermal shift assays to measure protein stability

    • Size exclusion chromatography to confirm monomeric state

  • Functional Validation:

    • RNA binding assays to verify interaction with ribosomal RNA

    • In vitro ribosome assembly assays

    • Complementation studies in ribosomal protein-deficient strains (where feasible)

  • Interaction Validation:

    • Pull-down assays with known ribosomal protein partners

    • Surface plasmon resonance to measure binding kinetics with rRNA

    • Crosslinking studies to capture transient interactions

For the most rigorous validation, researchers should compare the properties of recombinant rpmI with native protein isolated from Buchnera where possible, although this is challenging due to the difficulty of culturing this obligate endosymbiont. When interpreting functional assays, it's important to consider that recombinant rpmI may lack post-translational modifications present in the native context, potentially affecting certain interactions or functions.

What methodological approaches are effective for studying rpmI in the context of the aphid-Buchnera symbiosis?

Studying 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) within the complex context of the aphid-Buchnera symbiosis requires specialized methodological approaches that bridge molecular, cellular, and organismal scales:

  • Symbiont-Specific Protein Analysis:

    • Bacteriocyte isolation and subcellular fractionation to separate host and symbiont components

    • Differential centrifugation to isolate Buchnera ribosomes

    • Immuno-electron microscopy using antibodies against recombinant rpmI to localize the protein within bacteriocytes

  • Functional Genomics Approaches:

    • RNA interference targeting aphid genes that interact with Buchnera ribosomes

    • Transcriptome analysis of bacteriocytes under different physiological conditions

    • Ribosome profiling to assess translation dynamics in the symbiotic system

  • Innovative Visualization Techniques:

    • SNAP-tag fusion proteins for live-cell imaging of ribosome components

    • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to co-localize rpmI mRNA and protein

    • Super-resolution microscopy to visualize ribosome distribution within bacteriocytes

A key methodological consideration is the inability to culture Buchnera outside the aphid host, necessitating the use of recently isolated symbionts or the development of ex vivo systems that maintain Buchnera viability. Cell-wall labeling methods involving d-alanine probes have proven effective for studying Buchnera cellular structures and could be adapted for co-localization studies with ribosomal components. Ethical considerations regarding the use of aphids in research should follow institutional review board guidelines, with particular attention to principles such as "do no harm" and obtaining appropriate permissions .

How have ribosomal proteins like rpmI evolved in Buchnera compared to free-living bacteria?

The evolution of ribosomal proteins in Buchnera aphidicola, including rpmI, shows distinct patterns compared to their counterparts in free-living bacteria, reflecting adaptation to the endosymbiotic lifestyle:

  • Sequence Conservation: Ribosomal proteins in Buchnera show evidence of purifying selection, with Ka/Ks ratios typically ranging from 0 to 0.0956, similar to patterns observed in other bacterial species . This conservation reflects the essential nature of ribosomal function.

  • Gene Retention: Despite extensive genome reduction in Buchnera, ribosomal protein genes are largely retained, underscoring their essential function in cellular metabolism. This contrasts with variable retention patterns observed for other functional gene categories such as peptidoglycan synthesis genes .

  • Regulatory Evolution: The regulatory mechanisms controlling ribosomal protein expression in Buchnera are likely simplified compared to free-living bacteria, consistent with the streamlined genome and metabolic dependence on the host.

  • Functional Adaptation: Buchnera ribosomal proteins may have adapted to function efficiently despite unusual features of Buchnera genes, such as poor ribosome-binding sites preceding many genes . This adaptability may be reflected in subtle sequence changes that optimize translation in the endosymbiotic context.

  • Co-evolution with Host Factors: Some evidence suggests co-evolution between Buchnera ribosomal components and host factors, particularly in light of horizontally transferred genes of bacterial origin in the aphid genome that relate to symbiont cellular processes .

Phylogenetic analyses of ribosomal proteins across species reveal that each protein family undergoes a unique evolutionary trajectory, with some experiencing gene duplication events while others maintain single-copy status across lineages . The divergence time of ribosomal protein gene pairs between compared species (like Spodoptera litura and Bombyx mori) ranged from 84.90 Mya to 12.22 Mya, providing temporal context for evolutionary analysis .

What insights can comparative studies of rpmI across different aphid species provide about symbiont-host co-evolution?

Comparative studies of 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) across different aphid-Buchnera systems provide valuable insights into co-evolutionary dynamics in these intimate symbioses:

  • Evolutionary Rate Heterogeneity: Analysis of rpmI across Buchnera from different aphid species can reveal variable evolutionary rates potentially correlated with host ecology or evolutionary history. These patterns may reflect differing selective pressures across aphid lineages.

  • Correlation with Host Adaptation: Comparing rpmI sequence and expression patterns across Buchnera from aphids with different feeding habits or host plant specializations can reveal potential links between ribosomal protein evolution and host adaptation.

  • Relationship to Genome Architecture: The genomic context of rpmI varies across Buchnera lineages, potentially reflecting genome rearrangements during endosymbiont evolution. Analyzing these patterns can provide insights into the forces shaping endosymbiont genome architecture.

  • Co-evolution with Host Factors: By analyzing rpmI alongside corresponding host genes involved in protein synthesis or symbiont maintenance, researchers can identify co-evolutionary signatures suggesting functional integration between host and symbiont components.

  • Correlation with Peptidoglycan Synthesis Genes: The variable retention of peptidoglycan synthesis genes across Buchnera lineages provides an interesting comparative framework for examining the relationship between cell wall integrity and ribosome function in different symbiotic contexts.

The comprehensive sequencing of paired aphid and Buchnera genomes from 17 species representing eight subfamilies has enabled detailed comparative analyses of gene retention patterns . These studies have revealed that while some gene families show clear patterns of co-retention or co-loss between host and symbiont (like the coincident loss of host amiD and symbiont murCEF genes in tribe Aphidini), other genes like ribosomal proteins show more consistent retention patterns across lineages .

How do horizontal gene transfers affect research approaches to studying ribosomal proteins in the aphid-Buchnera system?

Horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) add a complex dimension to research on ribosomal proteins in the aphid-Buchnera system, necessitating specialized methodological approaches and careful interpretation:

  • Distinguishing Host and Symbiont Contributions: The presence of bacterial-origin genes in the aphid genome (like rlpA1-5, amiD, and ldcA) that are highly expressed in bacteriocytes requires careful experimental design to distinguish between host-encoded and symbiont-encoded factors affecting ribosome function.

  • Functional Integration Analysis: Research must address the potential functional integration between horizontally transferred genes and symbiont ribosomal components. For example, investigating whether aphid-encoded proteins of bacterial origin interact with Buchnera ribosomes.

  • Evolutionary Context Consideration: The evolutionary history of HGTs in aphids reveals that each horizontally transferred gene family was present in the aphid shared ancestor but underwent unique patterns of gene loss or duplication in descendant lineages . This evolutionary context is essential for interpreting comparative studies.

  • Correlative Pattern Analysis: The observation that the loss of aphid amiD and ldcA HTGs coincides with the loss of symbiont peptidoglycan metabolism genes suggests research approaches that look for correlative patterns between horizontally transferred genes and symbiont ribosomal protein evolution.

  • Combined Genomic-Functional Studies: Research approaches that integrate genomic analysis with functional studies are particularly valuable, as demonstrated by the combined use of genomic comparisons and cell-wall labeling methods that revealed maintained PGN synthesis despite gene losses .

The study of ribosomal proteins in the aphid-Buchnera system exemplifies the need for interdisciplinary approaches that account for the complex evolutionary history of both partners. The integration of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional analyses provides the most comprehensive view of how ribosomal components function in this intimate symbiosis and how they may interact with factors encoded by horizontally transferred genes.

What are the most promising future research directions for understanding the role of rpmI in Buchnera-aphid symbiosis?

Future research on 50S ribosomal protein L35 (rpmI) in the Buchnera-aphid symbiosis holds significant promise for advancing our understanding of endosymbiont biology and host-microbe interactions. Key directions include:

  • Structural Biology Approaches: High-resolution structural studies of Buchnera ribosomes, including the specific role of rpmI, would provide insights into potential adaptations for the endosymbiotic lifestyle and unusual translation environment.

  • Systems Biology Integration: Comprehensive -omics approaches combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to understand how ribosomal proteins like rpmI integrate into the broader metabolic network of the symbiotic system.

  • Synthetic Biology Applications: Engineering modified ribosomal components to probe function in heterologous systems or potentially develop experimental platforms for manipulating uncultivable endosymbionts.

  • Comparative Approaches Across Diverse Symbioses: Extending studies to other insect-endosymbiont systems to identify conserved and divergent features of ribosomal protein evolution in obligate endosymbiosis.

  • Development of Ex Vivo Culture Systems: Progress toward maintaining Buchnera outside the host, even temporarily, would revolutionize experimental approaches to studying symbiont ribosomal function.

These research directions would benefit from methodological advances in single-cell and subcellular analysis techniques, improvements in heterologous expression systems for endosymbiont proteins, and continued development of computational approaches for predicting protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions in these specialized systems.

What methodological gaps currently limit our understanding of Buchnera ribosomal proteins?

Several methodological challenges currently constrain research on Buchnera ribosomal proteins, presenting opportunities for technical innovation:

  • Inability to Culture Buchnera: The obligate nature of Buchnera prevents conventional microbiological approaches, limiting direct experimental manipulation. Development of improved ex vivo maintenance systems would significantly advance the field.

  • Challenges in Isolating Pure Symbiont Fractions: Current methods for separating host and symbiont components suffer from cross-contamination issues, complicating proteomic studies of Buchnera ribosomes. Improved fractionation techniques are needed.

  • Limited Genetic Manipulation Tools: The lack of genetic transformation systems for Buchnera prevents direct genetic studies of ribosomal protein function. Alternative approaches such as heterologous expression systems require careful validation.

  • Difficulties in Studying Protein-Protein Interactions in situ: Current techniques poorly capture the native interaction environment within bacteriocytes. Advanced imaging techniques with improved spatial resolution would enhance our understanding of ribosome organization in vivo.

  • Challenges in Functional Reconstitution: In vitro reconstitution of Buchnera translation systems has proven difficult, limiting functional studies of ribosomal components. Development of specialized in vitro translation systems tailored to Buchnera's unusual features would advance mechanistic studies.

Addressing these methodological gaps requires interdisciplinary approaches drawing on expertise in microbiology, biochemistry, structural biology, and advanced imaging. Collaborative efforts between research groups with complementary technical capabilities offer the most promising path forward.

How might research on Buchnera ribosomal proteins contribute to broader understandings of symbiosis and endosymbiont evolution?

Research on Buchnera ribosomal proteins, including rpmI, has broader implications for understanding fundamental aspects of symbiosis and endosymbiont evolution:

  • Models for Reductive Evolution: The patterns of retention and adaptation in ribosomal proteins provide insights into how essential cellular machineries evolve under genome reduction, relevant to understanding both symbiosis and organelle evolution.

  • Host-Symbiont Integration: The study of translation machinery at the host-symbiont interface illuminates principles of cellular integration that may apply across diverse symbiotic systems, from beneficial associations to parasitism.

  • Evolutionary Plasticity of Core Cellular Functions: Research on Buchnera ribosomal proteins challenges assumptions about the immutability of core cellular functions, revealing unexpected adaptability in fundamental processes like translation.

  • Mechanisms of Metabolic Complementation: Understanding how translation machinery is optimized for producing symbiont-derived nutrients provides insights into the mechanistic basis of metabolic complementation in symbioses.

  • Applications to Synthetic Biology: Insights from Buchnera ribosomal proteins could inform the design of minimal translation systems for synthetic biology applications, particularly for creating specialized protein production platforms.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.