Recombinant Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Baizongia pistaciae Probable tRNA threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis protein Gcp (gcp)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notice and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. Please specify your required tag type for preferential development.
Synonyms
tsaD; gcp; bbp_055; tRNA N6-adenosine threonylcarbamoyltransferase; EC 2.3.1.234; N6-L-threonylcarbamoyladenine synthase; t(6)A synthase; t(6)A37 threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis protein TsaD; tRNA threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis protein TsaD
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-338
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Baizongia pistaciae (strain Bp)
Target Names
tsaD
Target Protein Sequence
MTCILGIETS CDDTCVAVYD TNNGVIFNQV YSQSQLYNYY GGIVPEFSAR KHLEILIVLL KNIFKKGKIS KNLIDAVAYT AGPGLVGSLL VGASVGTALA YSLKVPVVLV NHMEAHLLTP MLENIKPTFP FLALLVSGGH TQLINALGIG EYELLGETLD DAVGEAFDKV AQALGLGYPG GSNLSKLARS GIPGTFNFPR PMINNSNLNF SFSGLKTFVL NIIQKNNNDF QIKANIAREF ENAVVDSLVI KCIRALKKLK YTTLVVSGGV SKNDVLRMHI NRIIKQYNYK VFYSHLKYCS DNAAMIAYVG SIRYKKFKSL NLEIKINPNW SIVDLAKI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein is essential for the formation of a threonylcarbamoyl group on adenosine at position 37 (t6A37) in tRNAs that recognize codons starting with adenine. It participates in transferring the threonylcarbamoyl moiety from threonylcarbamoyl-AMP (TC-AMP) to the N6 group of A37, in collaboration with TsaE and TsaB. TsaD likely plays a direct catalytic role in this reaction.

Database Links

KEGG: bab:bbp_055

STRING: 224915.bbp055

Protein Families
KAE1 / TsaD family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the functional role of tRNA threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis protein Gcp in Buchnera aphidicola?

The Gcp protein in Buchnera aphidicola is involved in the biosynthesis of threonylcarbamoyladenosine, a modified nucleoside found in tRNAs. This modification is crucial for maintaining translational fidelity and protein synthesis efficiency in this endosymbiont. Given Buchnera's reduced genome and its nutritional symbiosis with aphids, the retention of this gene suggests its essential role in maintaining cellular function and symbiotic relationships . Like other proteins in Buchnera, Gcp likely functions within the constraints of the organism's limited metabolic capabilities while supporting its primary role of synthesizing essential amino acids for the aphid host.

How has genome reduction in Buchnera aphidicola affected the conservation of the gcp gene?

Despite extensive genome reduction in Buchnera aphidicola, the gcp gene has been retained, indicating its essential function. The Buchnera genome from Baizongia pistaciae contains approximately 504 protein-coding genes, representing significant reduction compared to free-living relatives . The conservation of gcp amid this reduction suggests strong selective pressure to maintain tRNA modification capabilities. This conservation pattern aligns with other essential genes involved in translation and amino acid biosynthesis pathways that support the nutritional symbiosis with aphid hosts . The retention of gcp likely reflects its indispensable role in maintaining translational accuracy, which is particularly critical in an organism with limited error correction mechanisms.

What experimental approaches are recommended for expressing recombinant Gcp protein from Buchnera aphidicola?

For expressing recombinant Gcp from Buchnera aphidicola, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

  • Gene synthesis rather than direct cloning, accounting for the low GC content (typically around 25-30%) characteristic of Buchnera genes .

  • Codon optimization for the expression host (typically E. coli), as Buchnera's codon usage differs significantly from most expression systems.

  • Use of fusion tags (such as His6, MBP, or GST) to improve solubility and facilitate purification.

  • Expression in specialized E. coli strains designed for toxic or membrane-associated proteins, as Gcp may have specific folding requirements.

  • Low-temperature induction (16-20°C) to mitigate potential toxicity and improve proper folding.

This methodological framework addresses the challenges associated with expressing proteins from obligate endosymbionts with AT-rich genomes and specialized cellular environments .

What is known about the structure-function relationship of Gcp proteins in bacterial endosymbionts?

The structure-function relationship of Gcp in bacterial endosymbionts like Buchnera remains largely inferential due to limited direct structural studies. Based on homologous proteins, Gcp likely belongs to the metalloprotease superfamily with a characteristic metal-binding motif. The functional domains typically include:

DomainPredicted FunctionConservation in Buchnera
N-terminalSubstrate recognitionModerate conservation
Central catalyticMetal coordination and nucleophilic attackHighly conserved
C-terminalProtein-protein interactionsVariable conservation

The protein likely requires metal cofactors (Zn²⁺ or Mn²⁺) for catalytic activity in the threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis pathway. The retention of these structural features despite genome reduction underscores their essential nature for maintaining translational fidelity in these highly specialized endosymbionts .

How does the evolutionary rate of the gcp gene in Buchnera aphidicola compare to other genes involved in tRNA modification?

The evolutionary rate of the gcp gene in Buchnera aphidicola presents an interesting case study in molecular evolution within obligate endosymbionts. While direct comparative data for gcp specifically is limited in the search results, the evolutionary patterns of essential genes in Buchnera follow certain trends:

Gene CategoryEvolutionary RateSelection PressureExamples
Essential translation genesSlowStrong purifying16S rRNA, tRNA synthetases
tRNA modification genesModeratePurifyinggcp, trmD, truB
Amino acid biosynthesisVariableFunction-dependenttrpEG (elevated in some lineages)

The gcp gene likely experiences stronger purifying selection compared to amino acid biosynthesis genes like trpEG, which show evidence of amplification and adaptive evolution in some Buchnera lineages . The strict co-evolution between Buchnera and its aphid hosts (dated 150-250 million years ago) has created a unique evolutionary context for genes like gcp, where they must maintain function despite accumulating slightly deleterious mutations due to genetic drift in small effective population sizes .

What methodological approaches can overcome the challenges of studying protein function in unculturable endosymbionts like Buchnera?

Given the unculturable nature of Buchnera aphidicola, researchers face significant challenges when studying protein function. A comprehensive methodological framework includes:

  • Heterologous expression systems: Express Buchnera proteins in E. coli or yeast to characterize biochemical properties in vitro.

  • Antisense peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) approach: Similar to the technique demonstrated with groEL, researchers can:

    • Design antisense PNAs targeting gcp mRNA

    • Conjugate with cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) for enhanced cellular uptake

    • Deliver via microinjection into host aphids

    • Assess phenotypic consequences of gcp knockdown

  • Comparative genomics: Analyze conservation patterns across Buchnera strains from different aphid hosts to infer functional importance.

  • Structural modeling: Employ homology modeling based on related proteins with known structures to predict functional domains.

  • Host cell manipulation: Use RNAi to target host factors that interact with Buchnera proteins.

This multi-faceted approach allows for functional characterization despite the inability to culture the organism independently .

How do modifications in tRNA threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis affect the symbiotic relationship between Buchnera and its aphid host?

Disruptions in tRNA threonylcarbamoyladenosine biosynthesis potentially have profound effects on the symbiotic relationship between Buchnera and its aphid host:

  • Translational fidelity: Reduced modification of tRNAs leads to increased mistranslation, particularly affecting codons requiring the modified nucleoside.

  • Essential amino acid synthesis: Compromised translation efficiency may impair the biosynthesis of essential amino acids that Buchnera produces for its aphid host, similar to effects observed when other critical proteins like GroEL are disrupted .

  • Endosymbiont viability: Severe disruption of tRNA modification processes could affect Buchnera cell integrity and population dynamics, as observed with other essential genes .

  • Host development: Significant reduction in Buchnera functionality would impact aphid development, reproduction, and survival due to nutritional dependency.

  • Metabolic synchronization: tRNA modifications fine-tune translation rates, potentially affecting the coordination between host demands and endosymbiont amino acid production.

This interdependence highlights the delicate balance maintained in this ancient symbiotic relationship, where even disruptions to seemingly auxiliary processes like tRNA modification can have system-wide consequences .

What techniques are most effective for analyzing the interaction network of Gcp protein in the context of the reduced Buchnera proteome?

Analyzing protein interaction networks in Buchnera presents unique challenges due to its reduced proteome and unculturable nature. The most effective methodological approaches include:

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening using Gcp as bait against a Buchnera proteome library, with modifications to account for AT-rich codon bias.

  • Pull-down assays using recombinant tagged Gcp protein incubated with Buchnera cellular extracts obtained from purified bacteriocytes.

  • Chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry (CXMS) to capture transient interactions between Gcp and other proteins or RNA molecules.

  • Computational predictions of protein-protein interactions based on:

Prediction MethodStrengthsLimitationsApplication to Gcp
Homology-basedLeverages known interactionsLimited by divergenceIdentify conserved complexes
Gene neighborhoodUses genomic contextLimited in reduced genomesIdentify operonic relationships
Co-expressionIdentifies functional relationshipsRequires transcriptomic dataConnect to related pathways
  • Bacterial two-hybrid systems optimized for AT-rich genes to verify predicted interactions.

The integration of these approaches provides a comprehensive map of Gcp's functional network despite the experimental limitations inherent to studying obligate endosymbionts .

How does the genetic organization of the gcp gene region in different Buchnera strains reflect evolutionary adaptations to distinct aphid hosts?

The genetic organization surrounding the gcp gene across Buchnera strains offers insights into evolutionary adaptations to different aphid hosts:

These genomic organizational differences represent adaptations to the specific nutritional needs and evolutionary history of different aphid hosts, similar to the differential organization observed for tryptophan biosynthesis genes .

What are the implications of Gcp functional studies for developing novel approaches to manage aphid pests in agriculture?

Understanding Gcp function in Buchnera presents several potential applications for agricultural pest management:

  • Targeted symbiont disruption: Developing specific inhibitors of Gcp function could disrupt the Buchnera-aphid symbiosis. The PNA-based approach demonstrated with groEL provides a methodological framework for targeting gcp in vivo :

ApproachMechanismAdvantagesChallenges
Antisense PNAsBlocks translationHigh specificityDelivery to field populations
Small molecule inhibitorsDisrupts enzyme activityPotential for systemic deliveryTarget specificity
Host-induced gene silencingRNAi targeting symbiontCan be expressed in crop plantsRegulatory approval
  • Symbiosis management: Rather than complete disruption, modulating Gcp function could potentially alter amino acid production, affecting aphid fitness in specific agricultural contexts.

  • Resistance management: Targeting evolutionarily conserved genes like gcp may provide strategies that are less prone to resistance development compared to conventional insecticides.

  • Screening approaches: High-throughput systems to identify compounds that specifically disrupt Gcp function without affecting beneficial insects.

  • Transgenic strategies: Engineering crop plants to express molecules that interfere with Gcp function specifically within aphid bacteriocytes.

These approaches leverage fundamental research on obligate endosymbionts to develop targeted, environmentally conscious pest management strategies .

How might comparative studies of Gcp across different endosymbiont systems advance our understanding of tRNA modification in reduced genomes?

Comparative analysis of Gcp across diverse endosymbiont systems would provide valuable insights into the evolution and significance of tRNA modification machinery in reduced genomes. Future research should focus on:

  • Phylogenetic analysis of Gcp proteins from various obligate endosymbionts including Buchnera (aphids), Wigglesworthia (tsetse flies), and Blochmannia (ants) to identify lineage-specific adaptations.

  • Correlation between host lifestyle and Gcp sequence conservation/divergence, particularly examining whether faster-growing aphid species place different selective pressures on tRNA modification systems.

  • Experimental determination of minimum functional domains required for Gcp activity in reduced-genome contexts.

  • Investigation of potential compensatory mechanisms in endosymbionts that have lost certain tRNA modification capabilities.

  • Assessment of whether tRNA modification enzymes like Gcp experience different evolutionary constraints compared to other translation-related factors in obligate intracellular symbionts.

These comparative approaches would provide fundamental insights into the molecular mechanisms that maintain translational fidelity in some of the most extreme examples of genome reduction in cellular life .

What methodological advances would enable real-time monitoring of tRNA modification activities within intact bacteriocytes?

Developing techniques for real-time monitoring of tRNA modification within intact bacteriocytes represents a significant methodological challenge. Future approaches could include:

  • Fluorescent reporter systems:

    • Modified tRNAs labeled with fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) pairs

    • Changes in FRET signal would indicate modification status

    • Delivery via microinjection into bacteriocytes

  • Nanobody-based sensors:

    • Development of specific nanobodies that recognize the threonylcarbamoyladenosine modification

    • Conjugation with fluorophores for real-time imaging

    • Expression in transgenic aphids

  • Mass spectrometry innovations:

    • Development of in situ MALDI-imaging techniques for tRNA modifications

    • Spatial mapping of modification patterns within intact bacteriocytes

  • Single-cell sequencing adaptations:

    • Methods to capture and analyze tRNA populations from individual bacteriocytes

    • Detection of modification levels through nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Such methodological advances would transform our understanding of tRNA modification dynamics in host-restricted endosymbionts and potentially reveal previously unknown regulatory mechanisms in these specialized cellular environments .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.