Recombinant Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Schizaphis graminum Elongation factor Tu (tuf)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction

The elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is a critical GTPase protein in bacterial translation, facilitating the delivery of aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome during protein synthesis. In Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Schizaphis graminum, an obligate endosymbiont of aphids, the tuf gene encodes this essential protein. While direct experimental data on its recombinant form is limited in the provided sources, its structural and functional characteristics can be inferred from studies on Buchnera’s genome and related bacterial systems.

Genomic and Functional Context

  • Genome Conservation: Buchnera’s reduced genome (~600 kbp) retains core genes critical for symbiosis, including translation machinery. The tuf gene is likely conserved due to its essential role in protein synthesis .

  • Protein Structure: EF-Tu typically consists of three GTP-binding domains, with structural motifs enabling tRNA binding and ribosome interaction. Buchnera’s EF-Tu likely maintains this architecture, though genome reduction may have introduced minor adaptations .

  • Expression: High expression levels of flagellar proteins and translation machinery in Buchnera suggest robust translational activity, necessitating functional EF-Tu .

Recombinant Production and Biochemical Properties

Recombinant EF-Tu from Buchnera would likely be expressed in heterologous systems (e.g., E. coli) due to the bacterium’s inability to be cultured independently. Based on analogous proteins:

PropertyValue/Description
Molecular Weight~43-45 kDa (typical for bacterial EF-Tu)
Purity≥90% (via SDS-PAGE, as seen in similar proteins)
Storage BufferTris/PBS-based buffer with trehalose
StabilitySensitive to repeated freeze-thaw cycles

Applications in Research

  • Symbiosis Studies: Investigating EF-Tu’s role in nutrient exchange between Buchnera and its aphid host .

  • Structural Biology: Comparing Buchnera’s EF-Tu to free-living bacteria to study genome reduction impacts .

  • Diagnostic Tools: Potential use in Western blot or ELISA assays for detecting Buchnera in aphid tissues .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  • Direct Experimental Data: No specific studies on Buchnera’s recombinant EF-Tu exist in the provided sources, highlighting the need for targeted proteomic analyses.

  • Functional Studies: Investigating EF-Tu’s interaction with Buchnera’s translation machinery and aphid-derived factors.

  • Phylogenetic Comparisons: Aligning Buchnera’s tuf sequence with other endosymbionts to trace evolutionary divergence .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times may vary based on purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with normal blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
tuf; tufB; BUsg_507Elongation factor Tu; EF-Tu
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-394
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Buchnera aphidicola subsp. Schizaphis graminum (strain Sg)
Target Names
tuf
Target Protein Sequence
MSKEKFQRVK PHINVGTIGH VDHGKTTLTA AITTVLSKKY GGSARAFDQI DNAPEEKARG ITINTSHVEY DTELRHYAHV DCPGHADYIK NMITGAAQMD GAILVVAATD GPMPQTREHI LLGRQVGVPY IIVFLNKCDM VDDEELLELV EMEVRDLLTQ YDFPGDDTPI IRGSALKALE GDADWESKIL DLSKFLDTYI PEPKRAIDQP FLLPIEDVFS ISGRGTVVTG RVERGIVKVG EEVEIVGIKK TTKTTCTGVE MFRKLLDEGR AGENVGVLLR GTKRDEIERG QVLAKPGSIH PHTTFESEVY VLSKEEGGRH TPFFKGYRPQ FYFRTTDVTG SIELPEGVEM VMPGDNIKMT VTLIHPIAMA DGLRFAIREG GRTVGAGVVS KVLV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein facilitates the GTP-dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site during protein biosynthesis.
Database Links
Protein Families
TRAFAC class translation factor GTPase superfamily, Classic translation factor GTPase family, EF-Tu/EF-1A subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Buchnera aphidicola and why is its Elongation Factor Tu significant?

Buchnera aphidicola is an intracellular bacterial symbiont of aphids that maintains a remarkably small genome of approximately 600 kbps . Despite this genome reduction, Buchnera retains and highly expresses the tuf gene encoding Elongation Factor Tu (EF-Tu), indicating its essential function in this obligate symbiosis . EF-Tu is one of the most abundant proteins in the Buchnera proteome and plays a critical role in protein synthesis by delivering aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosome during translation . Its significance stems from both its conserved fundamental role in bacterial protein synthesis and its potential involvement in host-symbiont interactions that have evolved over millions of years of coevolution with aphids .

How do evolutionary rates of the tuf gene in Buchnera compare to free-living bacteria?

The tuf gene in Buchnera aphidicola demonstrates distinctive evolutionary patterns compared to free-living bacteria:

Substitution TypeBuchnera Rate (per position per year)Comparison to Free-living Bacteria
Nonsynonymous1.3 × 10⁻¹⁰ to 2.5 × 10⁻¹⁰Significantly higher than E. coli and S. typhimurium
Synonymous3.9 × 10⁻⁹ to 8.0 × 10⁻⁹Approximates mutation rates in E. coli and S. typhimurium

These rates are considered among the most reliable substitution rates for bacterial protein-coding genes . The elevated nonsynonymous substitution rates in Buchnera compared to related free-living bacteria like Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium suggest less efficient purifying selection in the endosymbiont lineage . Meanwhile, synonymous substitution rates approximate mutation rates for E. coli and S. typhimurium, consistent with synonymous changes acting as neutral mutations in Buchnera . These evolutionary patterns are attributed to the absence of selective codon preferences in Buchnera and the influence of Muller's ratchet (the irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations in asexual populations) on small asexual populations .

What methods are commonly used to isolate Buchnera aphidicola from aphid hosts?

Isolating Buchnera from aphid hosts requires specialized techniques due to the intracellular nature of these endosymbionts. A standardized protocol involves:

  • Cultivating aphids (e.g., Acyrthosiphon pisum strain LSR1) on host plants under controlled conditions (16h/8h light/dark cycles at 20°C)

  • Surface sterilization of aphids in 0.5% NaClO solution followed by rinsing in ultrapure water

  • Gentle grinding of aphids in Buffer A (25mM KCl, 35mM Tris base, 10mM MgCl₂, 250mM EDTA, and 500mM Sucrose at pH 7.5)

  • Sequential vacuum filtration (100μm → 20μm → 10μm → 5μm) and centrifugation steps to separate Buchnera cells

  • Resuspension of the Buchnera pellet in sucrose solution (300mM sucrose and 100mM Tris base)

This procedure yields intact Buchnera cells that remain viable at 4°C for up to 24 hours, allowing for subsequent protein isolation and analysis . The protocol's success can be verified by brightfield microscopy to confirm the presence of intact Buchnera cells .

What are the optimal protocols for isolating and purifying recombinant Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu protein?

Isolating EF-Tu from Buchnera aphidicola presents unique challenges due to the organism's obligate endosymbiotic nature and inability to be cultured conventionally. A specialized protocol adapted from research on flagellum basal body complexes can be modified for EF-Tu isolation:

  • Preparation of Buchnera cells from aphids using differential centrifugation and filtration as described in section 1.3

  • Incubation of Buchnera cells with egg white lysozyme (0.1mg/mL) on ice for 30 minutes

  • Addition of EDTA to a final concentration of 10mM, followed by gradual warming to room temperature with gentle agitation

  • Addition of Triton X-100 (1% w/v) and DNase I (1mg/mL) with 30 minutes of stirring to lyse cells

  • pH adjustment to 10 using 1N NaOH to denature host and bacterial cytoplasmic proteins

  • Sequential centrifugation at 5000g (10 min, 4°C, three times) followed by ultracentrifugation at 30,000g (1 hour, 4°C)

  • Resuspension of the pellet in TET buffer (10mM Tris-HCl, 5mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, pH 8.0) overnight at 4°C

  • For recombinant EF-Tu specifically, immuno-affinity chromatography using anti-EF-Tu antibodies can provide higher purity

This methodology typically yields highly enriched protein preparations, as demonstrated by mass spectrometry analyses showing significant enrichment of target proteins relative to other proteins in the Buchnera proteome .

How can researchers overcome challenges in expressing recombinant Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu in heterologous systems?

Expression of recombinant Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu in heterologous systems faces several challenges due to the peculiar evolutionary history and genetic characteristics of this endosymbiont. Addressing these challenges requires specific strategies:

  • Codon optimization: Due to the absence of selective codon preferences in Buchnera , the tuf gene sequence should be optimized for expression in the host system (typically E. coli) to improve translation efficiency.

  • Expression vector selection: Vectors containing promoters that provide moderate expression levels (such as pET28a with IPTG-inducible T7 promoter) often yield better results than high-expression systems that may lead to inclusion body formation.

  • Fusion tags: Addition of solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, or TrxA) can significantly improve folding and solubility of recombinant Buchnera EF-Tu.

  • Expression conditions: Lower temperatures (16-20°C) and reduced inducer concentrations have proven effective in improving soluble protein yields by slowing protein synthesis and allowing proper folding.

  • Purification strategy: A two-step chromatography approach combining affinity chromatography and size exclusion chromatography typically yields the highest purity recombinant EF-Tu protein.

Researchers should be mindful that Buchnera proteins may have evolved unique structural characteristics due to their endosymbiotic lifestyle and the effects of Muller's ratchet on their genetic composition , potentially affecting their expression in heterologous systems.

What mass spectrometry approaches are most effective for characterizing Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu?

Mass spectrometry (MS) has proven valuable for characterizing Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu, with specific approaches yielding the most comprehensive results:

  • LC-MS/MS with high-resolution mass analyzers: Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry utilizing Orbitrap or Q-TOF mass analyzers provides the sensitivity needed for detailed characterization of EF-Tu isolated from limited Buchnera samples .

  • Multiple fragmentation techniques: Combining collision-induced dissociation (CID), higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) enables comprehensive sequence coverage and post-translational modification (PTM) analysis.

  • Quantitative proteomics: Label-free quantification approaches have successfully demonstrated the high abundance of EF-Tu in the Buchnera proteome relative to other proteins, confirming it as one of the most abundantly expressed proteins alongside GroL .

  • Comparative analysis: Comparing spectral counts from isolated protein fractions with proteomic datasets from whole aphids and dissected bacteriocytes provides valuable insights into enrichment efficiency and relative abundance in different sample preparations .

For example, studies have used these approaches to show significant enrichment of specific Buchnera proteins during isolation procedures, with EF-Tu (Tuf) being among the most abundant proteins in the Buchnera proteome but becoming depleted during flagellum basal body isolation procedures , indicating its primarily cytoplasmic localization.

How does the structure and function of Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu differ from that of free-living bacteria?

Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu maintains its core function in protein synthesis while exhibiting specific structural and functional adaptations compared to homologs in free-living bacteria:

These differences reflect the unique evolutionary trajectory of Buchnera as an obligate endosymbiont, balancing the preservation of essential functions with adaptation to the intracellular environment of aphid bacteriocytes.

What role might EF-Tu play in the Buchnera-aphid symbiotic relationship?

While EF-Tu's primary role in protein synthesis is well-established, evidence suggests potential additional functions in the Buchnera-aphid symbiotic relationship:

  • Molecular recognition: In pathogenic bacteria, EF-Tu can act as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) that triggers host immune responses. In the Buchnera-aphid symbiosis, EF-Tu might serve as a molecular signal recognized by aphid cells to regulate symbiont populations.

  • Potential secretion: Although not directly identified as secreted, EF-Tu's high abundance in Buchnera places it among proteins that could potentially interact with host cells. Buchnera retains gene clusters coding for flagellum basal body proteins that may function as type III secretion systems , potentially providing a mechanism for protein secretion.

  • Metabolic integration: Buchnera provides essential amino acids to its aphid host. As a key protein in translation, EF-Tu may be critical for maintaining the biosynthetic capacity of Buchnera in nutrient-poor phloem-based diets, indirectly supporting aphid nutrition.

  • Stress response: In some bacteria, EF-Tu participates in stress responses. In the context of Buchnera-aphid symbiosis, EF-Tu might contribute to bacterial adaptation to changing host physiological conditions, particularly in response to environmental stressors affecting the aphid host.

The specific mechanisms of these potential non-canonical functions remain speculative and represent important avenues for future research on this model symbiotic system.

How has the reduced genome of Buchnera aphidicola influenced the evolution of its EF-Tu protein?

The extreme genome reduction in Buchnera aphidicola has profoundly influenced the evolution of its EF-Tu protein through several mechanisms:

  • Accelerated evolutionary rates: The tuf gene in Buchnera evolves with significantly higher nonsynonymous substitution rates compared to free-living relatives , consistent with the influence of Muller's ratchet on this asexual population with limited effective population size.

  • Loss of codon bias: Unlike free-living bacteria that show strong codon preferences, Buchnera lacks selective codon bias , resulting in different patterns of synonymous substitutions in the tuf gene.

  • Functional constraint despite genomic reduction: Despite extensive gene loss throughout the Buchnera genome, the tuf gene has been retained and remains highly expressed , underscoring its essential function that cannot be complemented by the host.

  • Relaxed purifying selection: The higher nonsynonymous substitution rates suggest relaxed purifying selection on some portions of the EF-Tu protein, potentially allowing amino acid changes that would be deleterious in free-living bacteria.

  • Co-evolution with host factors: The long-term association with aphid hosts (dating back approximately 160-280 million years) has potentially led to co-evolutionary adaptations in EF-Tu to function optimally within the specific intracellular environment of aphid bacteriocytes.

These evolutionary patterns demonstrate how an essential protein adapts within the constraints of an obligate endosymbiotic lifestyle while maintaining its core functionality in protein synthesis.

What are effective strategies for investigating post-translational modifications of Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu?

Investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) of Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu requires specialized approaches due to the challenging nature of obtaining sufficient endosymbiont material:

  • Phosphoproteome analysis: Studies on switchgrass response to greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) herbivory have demonstrated effective phosphoproteome analysis using label-free proteomics shotgun techniques . This approach identified phosphopeptides with primarily serine phosphorylated residues (79%) compared to threonine phosphorylated sites (21%) . Similar techniques can be applied specifically to Buchnera EF-Tu.

  • Enrichment techniques: For comprehensive PTM analysis, phosphopeptide enrichment using titanium dioxide (TiO₂) or immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) significantly improves detection sensitivity.

  • Multiple proteases strategy: Using complementary proteases (trypsin, chymotrypsin, and Glu-C) to generate overlapping peptides increases sequence coverage and improves PTM site identification.

  • Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM): This targeted mass spectrometry approach enables quantification of specific modified peptides, providing insights into the stoichiometry of EF-Tu modifications under different conditions.

  • Comparative analysis: Comparing PTM profiles of Buchnera EF-Tu from different aphid species or under various stress conditions can reveal functional significance of these modifications in the symbiotic relationship.

These methodologies enable researchers to map the PTM landscape of Buchnera EF-Tu and investigate how these modifications might regulate protein function in the context of the aphid-Buchnera symbiosis.

How can researchers effectively design experiments to study interactions between Buchnera EF-Tu and aphid host proteins?

Designing experiments to study interactions between Buchnera EF-Tu and aphid host proteins presents unique challenges due to the obligate nature of the symbiosis. Effective experimental approaches include:

  • Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening:

    • Clone the Buchnera tuf gene into a bait vector and screen against a prey library of aphid (Schizaphis graminum) proteins

    • Validate positive interactions through secondary screens to minimize false positives

    • Confirm interactions using alternative methods such as co-immunoprecipitation

  • Pull-down assays with recombinant proteins:

    • Express recombinant Buchnera EF-Tu with affinity tags (His, GST, or FLAG)

    • Incubate with aphid tissue lysates followed by affinity purification

    • Identify interacting partners by mass spectrometry

    • Validate specific interactions with Western blotting

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):

    • Fuse Buchnera EF-Tu and candidate aphid proteins to complementary fragments of a fluorescent protein

    • Express in appropriate cell models or through microinjection into aphid cells

    • Monitor fluorescence reconstitution indicating protein-protein proximity

  • Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS):

    • Apply chemical crosslinkers to isolated bacteriocytes containing Buchnera

    • Digest and analyze by mass spectrometry to identify crosslinked peptides

    • Map interaction surfaces between EF-Tu and aphid proteins

  • Immunolocalization studies:

    • Generate specific antibodies against Buchnera EF-Tu

    • Perform immunofluorescence microscopy on aphid bacteriocytes

    • Use co-localization analysis to identify potential interacting host proteins

These methodologies provide complementary approaches to identifying and characterizing potential interactions between Buchnera EF-Tu and aphid host proteins, offering insights into the molecular basis of this obligate symbiosis.

What genetic manipulation approaches can be used to study Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu function despite its unculturable nature?

  • RNA interference (RNAi) in aphids:

    • Design dsRNA targeting the Buchnera tuf gene

    • Deliver via microinjection, feeding, or soaking methods to aphids

    • Monitor effects on Buchnera population dynamics and aphid fitness

    • Quantify EF-Tu levels using qPCR and Western blotting to confirm knockdown

  • Heterologous expression systems:

    • Express Buchnera tuf genes in related, culturable bacteria (e.g., E. coli)

    • Utilize temperature-sensitive E. coli tuf mutants for complementation studies

    • Compare functionality of Buchnera EF-Tu with homologs from free-living bacteria

  • Functional replacement studies:

    • Generate chimeric EF-Tu proteins combining domains from Buchnera and E. coli

    • Express in E. coli tuf mutants to identify functionally important regions

    • Correlate structural differences with functional outcomes

  • In vitro translation systems:

    • Develop reconstituted translation systems incorporating purified Buchnera EF-Tu

    • Compare translation efficiency and accuracy with systems using EF-Tu from free-living bacteria

    • Identify specific functional adaptations in the Buchnera protein

  • Aphid line selection experiments:

    • Maintain aphid lines under different selection pressures

    • Monitor changes in Buchnera tuf gene expression and sequence

    • Correlate with changes in symbiont density and host fitness

These approaches, while indirect, can provide valuable insights into the function and evolution of Buchnera EF-Tu despite the inability to directly manipulate the endosymbiont genome through conventional genetic techniques.

How might understanding Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu evolution inform symbiosis research in other systems?

The study of Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu evolution provides valuable insights that can inform symbiosis research across diverse biological systems:

  • Molecular clock applications: The well-established evolutionary rates of the tuf gene in Buchnera (1.3 × 10⁻¹⁰ to 2.5 × 10⁻¹⁰ nonsynonymous and 3.9 × 10⁻⁹ to 8.0 × 10⁻⁹ synonymous substitutions per position per year) serve as reliable calibration points for molecular clock analyses in other endosymbiont systems where fossil records may be lacking.

  • Genomic reduction models: The retention and high expression of tuf despite extreme genome reduction illustrates how essential genes are preserved during symbiont genome streamlining, providing a model for predicting gene retention patterns in nascent symbioses.

  • Functional repurposing: The potential multifunctional nature of Buchnera EF-Tu suggests mechanisms by which conserved bacterial proteins may evolve new roles in symbiotic associations, a pattern potentially repeated across diverse symbiotic systems.

  • Host-symbiont co-evolution: The methods used to calibrate Buchnera tuf gene phylogeny using aphid host divergence times demonstrate effective approaches for studying co-evolutionary dynamics in other symbiotic systems.

  • Muller's ratchet effects: The observed patterns of sequence evolution in Buchnera tuf genes provide empirical evidence for the effects of Muller's ratchet in endosymbiont populations , offering insights applicable to other obligate symbionts with similar population structures.

These principles derived from Buchnera EF-Tu research can guide investigations into other symbiotic systems, particularly those involving intracellular bacteria with reduced genomes.

What are the implications of Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu research for understanding agricultural pest resistance?

Research on Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu has significant implications for developing novel approaches to agricultural pest management, particularly for aphid species like Schizaphis graminum that act as major crop pests:

  • Symbiont-targeted pest control: Understanding the critical role of EF-Tu in Buchnera metabolism and aphid nutrition could lead to the development of targeted compounds that interfere with EF-Tu function, potentially disrupting the symbiosis without broad-spectrum environmental impacts.

  • Host plant resistance mechanisms: Studies on switchgrass response to greenbug (Schizaphis graminum) herbivory have revealed complex proteome and phosphoproteome changes in plants . Comparing these responses with the biology of Buchnera EF-Tu could identify novel connections between plant defense and symbiont function.

  • Symbiosis-based biomarkers: The highly conserved nature of EF-Tu makes it a potential biomarker for monitoring Buchnera population dynamics in field conditions, potentially allowing early detection of aphid infestations before visible crop damage occurs.

  • Climate change adaptation: Understanding how temperature and other environmental stressors affect Buchnera EF-Tu function could help predict shifts in aphid pest ranges and damage potential under climate change scenarios.

  • RNA interference applications: The essential nature of EF-Tu for Buchnera makes the tuf gene a potential target for RNAi-based pest management strategies, where dsRNA targeting this gene could be expressed in crop plants or applied as biopesticides.

These applications highlight how fundamental research on Buchnera EF-Tu can translate into practical agricultural innovations for sustainable pest management.

What methodological advances are needed to further Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu research?

Despite significant progress in understanding Buchnera aphidicola EF-Tu, several methodological challenges remain that, if addressed, would substantially advance the field:

  • In vivo imaging techniques: Development of non-destructive methods to visualize EF-Tu localization and dynamics within living bacteriocytes would transform our understanding of its potential non-canonical functions. This might involve advanced fluorescent protein tagging systems compatible with the Buchnera cellular environment.

  • Single-cell proteomics: Refinement of single-cell proteomic techniques to analyze individual bacteriocytes would enable examination of cell-to-cell variation in EF-Tu abundance and modifications, potentially revealing functional heterogeneity within Buchnera populations.

  • Cryo-electron microscopy applications: Adapting cryo-EM techniques specifically for Buchnera would allow determination of high-resolution structures of EF-Tu in its native cellular context, potentially revealing structural adaptations not evident in recombinant protein studies.

  • CRISPR-based approaches: While direct genetic manipulation of Buchnera remains challenging, development of host-directed CRISPR systems that could modify aphid genes interacting with Buchnera EF-Tu would provide powerful tools for functional studies.

  • Synthetic biology platforms: Creation of minimal cellular systems incorporating Buchnera EF-Tu would enable controlled studies of its function outside the complex host environment, potentially allowing direct manipulation not possible in the natural system.

  • Comparative multi-omics: Integration of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data across multiple aphid species and their Buchnera endosymbionts would provide a systems-level understanding of EF-Tu's role in these symbioses.

These methodological advances would address current technical limitations in studying this obligate endosymbiont and potentially reveal new aspects of EF-Tu function in the Buchnera-aphid symbiosis.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.