The atpD gene encodes the β-subunit of the F0F1 ATP synthase, a membrane-bound enzyme responsible for ATP synthesis during oxidative phosphorylation. Key features include:
Catalytic Activity: Participates in ATP hydrolysis/synthesis via conformational changes in the α/β subunits .
Metabolic Regulation: Downregulated during B. cenocepacia adhesion to host cells (e.g., bronchial epithelial cells), suggesting reduced energy demand in early infection stages .
Cofactor Dependency: Requires Mg²⁺ or other divalent cations for enzymatic activity, akin to related ATP synthases .
atpD is a conserved marker in multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes for Burkholderia species:
Though no direct studies on recombinant atpD are cited, methodologies from related Burkholderia proteins provide a framework:
Cloning Strategies: Genes are typically amplified via PCR, ligated into plasmids (e.g., pET23a+), and expressed in E. coli .
Structural Predictions: Homology modeling based on Meiothermus ruber PPK2-III (51% identity) suggests conserved Walker A/B motifs critical for ATP binding .
Potential Applications:
Expression Dynamics: atpD transcription is repressed during host cell adhesion, paralleling reduced oxidative phosphorylation .
Thermostability: Related F0F1 ATP synthase subunits in Burkholderia show stability up to 62°C, suggesting recombinant atpD may retain function under harsh conditions .
Evolutionary Conservation: Low dN/dS ratios (synonymous vs. nonsynonymous mutations) in atpD indicate strong purifying selection, emphasizing its essential role .
Structural Characterization: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography of recombinant atpD could clarify its role in ATP synthase assembly.
Pathogenicity Link: Does atpD downregulation during infection enhance persistence or antibiotic tolerance?
Biocatalytic Potential: Can recombinant atpD be integrated into ATP-regenerating systems for industrial enzymology ?
ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) is a critical component of the F1 sector of ATP synthase (EC 3.6.3.14) in Burkholderia cenocepacia. This protein plays an essential role in cellular energy metabolism, participating in the synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate during oxidative phosphorylation. The beta subunit contains the catalytic sites responsible for ATP synthesis and is highly conserved across bacterial species due to its fundamental role in energy production.
In B. cenocepacia, atpD is particularly important as this opportunistic pathogen requires efficient energy metabolism to survive in diverse environments, from soil and plant rhizospheres to the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients . The protein consists of 464 amino acids in B. cenocepacia strain AU 1054, as documented in the UniProt database (Q1BRB0) .
Recent genomic analyses have revealed that strains currently classified as Burkholderia cenocepacia actually represent at least two distinct species. Phylogenetic analyses and whole genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) studies suggest a significant taxonomic division within this group .
The two main clades identified are:
A clade containing most clinical isolates, including the highly virulent ET12 lineage, which possesses multiple key virulence factors
A clade enriched in environmental isolates that lacks several genetic traits involved in human virulence
Digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) analysis supports this species delimitation, with values ranging from 49.9% to 61% between the two clades, well below the 70% threshold for considering organisms as the same species . Additionally, some strains originally described as B. cenocepacia show closer genomic identity with other Burkholderia species:
| Strain | Closest species match | Identity (%) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 869 T2 | B. seminalis | 98.99 | 88.85 |
| DDS 22E-1 | B. pseudomultivorans | 97.57 | 80.85 |
| DWS 37E-2 | B. latens | 99.01 | 89.92 |
These findings indicate that what has been called B. cenocepacia may actually be B. cenocepacia sensu stricto plus a separate species that shows different virulence characteristics .
Recombinant ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) serves as an excellent phylogenetic marker for studying evolutionary relationships among Burkholderia species for several reasons:
Optimal evolutionary rate: atpD contains sufficient sequence variation to discriminate between closely related species while maintaining enough conservation to establish deeper evolutionary relationships.
Single-copy nature: Unlike 16S rRNA genes which may exist in multiple copies, atpD typically exists as a single copy in bacterial genomes, avoiding the complications of paralogous gene analysis.
Essential function: As a component of a critical metabolic pathway, atpD is present in all Burkholderia species, making it universally applicable for comparative studies.
For phylogenetic studies, researchers can:
Amplify and sequence the atpD gene from multiple Burkholderia isolates
Express and analyze recombinant atpD proteins to examine structural and functional differences
Combine atpD sequence data with other housekeeping genes in multilocus sequence typing approaches
In the context of the recent findings showing that B. cenocepacia comprises at least two distinct species, atpD sequence analysis can contribute significantly to clarifying taxonomic classifications and understanding the divergence between clinical and environmental isolates .
While ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) is primarily involved in energy metabolism rather than being a classical virulence factor, it may contribute to virulence and host adaptation in B. cenocepacia through several indirect mechanisms:
Energy provision for virulence:
Efficient ATP production is crucial for powering energy-intensive virulence processes
Adaptation of energy metabolism to different host environments may involve atpD modifications
Survival under stress conditions:
In host environments, pathogens face various stresses (nutrient limitation, immune response)
Optimized ATP synthase function could contribute to stress tolerance and persistence
Potential moonlighting functions:
Some metabolic enzymes, including ATP synthase components, have been shown to have secondary functions
atpD could potentially play roles beyond energy metabolism, such as in adhesion or immune evasion
Insights from the use of ATP synthase subunit beta (AtpD) as a serological marker in other bacteria, such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, suggest potential applications for B. cenocepacia atpD in diagnostic contexts .
The development pathway for atpD-based diagnostics could include:
Antigen identification and validation:
Express and purify recombinant B. cenocepacia atpD
Validate recognition by sera from patients with confirmed B. cenocepacia infections
Assay development:
Develop enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for detecting IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies
Optimize assay conditions for maximum sensitivity and specificity
Performance assessment:
Evaluate using well-characterized serum panels from infected patients and healthy controls
Compare performance with existing diagnostic methods
Based on studies with M. pneumoniae, combining atpD with other B. cenocepacia antigens might improve diagnostic performance . For example, researchers found that combining the recombinant AtpD and the C-terminal fragment of adhesin P1 provided maximum discrimination between M. pneumoniae-infected patients and healthy subjects for IgM detection .
| Antigen | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rAtpD alone | 85.4 | 82.6 | 86.1 | 81.9 |
| rP1-C alone | 88.2 | 84.1 | 87.5 | 85.0 |
| rAtpD + rP1-C | 94.6 | 91.3 | 92.8 | 93.4 |
Note: This table is an example based on M. pneumoniae studies; actual values for B. cenocepacia would require specific validation.
Based on available information and established protocols for similar proteins, the following approach is recommended for efficient expression and purification of recombinant B. cenocepacia atpD:
Expression System:
Host: E. coli is the documented expression system for B. cenocepacia atpD
Vector: pET-series vectors with T7 promoter for high-level expression
Tags: Consider His6-tag for purification; fusion partners like MBP or SUMO may improve solubility
Expression Conditions:
Temperature: 16-20°C for overnight expression often improves solubility
Induction: 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG for controlled expression
Media: LB or TB medium for standard expression; defined media for isotope labeling if NMR studies are planned
Duration: 16-24 hours at lower temperatures
Purification Strategy:
Cell lysis in appropriate buffer (typically Tris or phosphate buffer, pH 7.5-8.0)
Initial purification by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Tag removal if necessary using site-specific proteases
Further purification by ion exchange and size exclusion chromatography
Storage Recommendations:
For liquid formulations: Store at -20°C/-80°C for up to 6 months
For lyophilized preparations: Store at -20°C/-80°C for up to 12 months
Addition of glycerol (5-50% final concentration) is recommended before freezing
Reconstitution:
For lyophilized protein, reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Consider adding glycerol (5-50% final concentration) for long-term storage
Assessing the activity of recombinant ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) in vitro requires specialized approaches since this protein normally functions as part of the multisubunit ATP synthase complex:
1. ATP/ADP Binding Assays:
Fluorescence-based methods:
Measure changes in intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence upon nucleotide binding
Use fluorescent ATP analogs (e.g., TNP-ATP) to monitor binding directly
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC):
Quantitatively determine binding affinities and thermodynamic parameters
2. Partial Reactions of Catalysis:
ATP hydrolysis activity:
Isolated beta subunits may exhibit some ATPase activity
Measure inorganic phosphate release using colorimetric assays (malachite green)
Monitor ADP formation using coupled enzyme assays
Experimental Setup for ATP Hydrolysis Assay:
| Component | Concentration |
|---|---|
| Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 | 50 mM |
| MgCl₂ | 5 mM |
| ATP | 2-5 mM |
| Recombinant atpD | 0.1-1 μM |
Incubate at 37°C for 15-60 minutes
Measure inorganic phosphate release using malachite green assay
Calculate phosphate release using a standard curve
3. Structural Integrity Assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to verify proper folding
Differential scanning fluorimetry to assess thermal stability and nucleotide effects
4. Reconstitution Experiments:
Combine recombinant atpD with other purified ATP synthase subunits
Measure ATP synthesis or hydrolysis activities of reconstituted complexes
These approaches allow for comprehensive evaluation of recombinant atpD functionality even in the absence of the complete ATP synthase complex.
Analyzing ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) sequence conservation across different strains of B. cenocepacia requires sophisticated bioinformatic approaches:
1. Sequence Alignment and Conservation Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment using tools like MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Clustal Omega
Conservation scoring using entropy-based methods or substitution matrix-based scoring
Sliding window analysis to identify regions of high/low conservation
2. Phylogenetic Analysis:
Maximum Likelihood methods (RAxML, IQ-TREE) for tree construction
Evolutionary model testing to find best-fit models
Comparison between clinical and environmental B. cenocepacia clades to identify clade-specific signatures
3. Selection Pressure Analysis:
Calculate dN/dS ratios to assess selective pressures using PAML or HyPhy
Site-specific selection detection to identify positively or negatively selected residues
Branch-site tests for lineage-specific selection potentially related to host adaptation
4. Structural Bioinformatics:
Homology modeling of atpD structures using tools like SWISS-MODEL or AlphaFold
Mapping sequence variation to structure to identify if variable regions correspond to surface-exposed areas
Assessing if conserved regions map to functional sites or protein-protein interfaces
Comparative Analysis Framework:
| Analysis Type | Tools | Key Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence alignment | MUSCLE, MAFFT | Identification of variable/conserved regions |
| Phylogenetic analysis | RAxML, IQ-TREE | Strain relationships, clade definition |
| Selection analysis | PAML, HyPhy | Sites under selection, adaptation signatures |
| Structural mapping | PyMOL, UCSF Chimera | Functional interpretation of variation |
This comprehensive bioinformatic toolkit enables thorough investigation of atpD sequence conservation patterns across B. cenocepacia strains, providing insights into evolutionary dynamics and potential adaptation to different ecological niches, including the differences between clinical and environmental isolates identified in recent genomic studies .
Expressing and purifying functional recombinant ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) from B. cenocepacia presents several technical challenges:
Protein solubility: atpD normally functions as part of a multi-subunit complex, and when expressed alone, it may form inclusion bodies due to exposed hydrophobic surfaces that would normally interact with other ATP synthase components.
Proper folding: Ensuring correct folding is crucial for maintaining native structure and function, particularly challenging when expressing a protein from a gram-negative bacterium like B. cenocepacia in heterologous systems.
Stability during purification: atpD may be susceptible to degradation during purification, necessitating the use of protease inhibitors and optimized buffer conditions.
Functional assessment: Unlike enzymes with easily assayable activities, testing the functionality of isolated atpD is difficult since it normally operates as part of the ATP synthase complex.
Endotoxin contamination: When expressed in E. coli, purified recombinant proteins may contain lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination, which can interfere with immunological studies.
Strategies to overcome these challenges include:
Using solubility-enhancing tags like MBP or SUMO
Optimizing expression conditions (lower temperature, reduced inducer concentration)
Employing specialized E. coli strains designed for expressing difficult proteins
Implementing rigorous purification protocols with appropriate quality control steps
Considering co-expression with other ATP synthase subunits
The genomic analyses indicating that B. cenocepacia likely comprises at least two distinct species—one clade dominated by clinical isolates and another by environmental isolates—raises important questions about the role of atpD in host adaptation .
While specific differences in atpD between these clades are not explicitly detailed in the available research, several hypotheses can be proposed:
Sequence variations: Clinical isolates might exhibit specific amino acid substitutions that optimize ATP synthase function in host environments, while environmental isolates may have adaptations for variable external conditions.
Regulatory adaptations: Expression levels and regulation of atpD might differ between clinical and environmental isolates to meet different energetic demands.
Energy efficiency: Clinical isolates might have evolved more efficient ATP synthesis to thrive in the specific conditions of host environments, while environmental isolates might prioritize versatility over efficiency.
To definitively characterize these differences, comparative studies would need to:
Sequence and analyze atpD from multiple strains of both clades
Compare biochemical properties, stability, and enzymatic activities
Investigate structural differences using techniques like X-ray crystallography
The finding that the clade enriched in environmental isolates lacks multiple key virulence factors, which are conserved in the clade where most clinical isolates fall , suggests that even conserved proteins like atpD might show subtle but functionally significant differences that contribute to adaptation to different ecological niches.
ATP synthase is an attractive target for antimicrobial development due to its essential role in bacterial energy metabolism. Several aspects make B. cenocepacia atpD a potential target for novel therapeutic approaches:
Essential function: Disrupting ATP synthase activity would severely compromise bacterial energy production and survival.
Surface accessibility: The beta subunit has regions that could potentially be accessed by inhibitors.
Structural uniqueness: Differences between bacterial and human ATP synthases could be exploited for selective targeting.
Research approaches could include:
High-throughput screening for small molecule inhibitors specific to B. cenocepacia atpD
Structure-based drug design targeting unique features of the protein
Inhibitory antibody development against surface-exposed regions
Peptide inhibitors designed to disrupt atpD interactions with other ATP synthase subunits
This approach is particularly relevant for B. cenocepacia infections, which are notoriously difficult to treat due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. Targeting essential metabolic enzymes represents a promising alternative strategy that might be less prone to resistance development.
Comparative studies of atpD between the clinical-dominated and environmental-dominated clades of B. cenocepacia could provide valuable insights into bacterial adaptation to different ecological niches :
Identification of adaptive signatures: Detailed sequence and structural comparisons could reveal specific substitutions that contribute to host adaptation.
Functional consequences: Biochemical characterization of atpD variants from both clades might demonstrate differences in catalytic efficiency, regulatory properties, or stability under different conditions.
Co-evolutionary patterns: Analysis of atpD evolution in concert with other ATP synthase subunits might reveal coordinated changes that optimize energy production in different environments.
Integration with virulence studies: Correlating atpD variations with the documented differences in virulence factor distribution between clades could illuminate the relationship between energy metabolism and pathogenicity.
A comprehensive research program would include:
Sequencing atpD from multiple strains representing both clades
Recombinant expression and biochemical characterization
Structural studies to identify meaningful differences
In vivo studies to assess the impact of atpD variants on bacterial fitness in different environments
Such work would contribute to our fundamental understanding of bacterial adaptation mechanisms and potentially identify new targets for therapeutic intervention.