Recombinant Burkholderia phymatum tRNA pseudouridine synthase A (truA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Role of TruA in Burkholderia spp.

TruA belongs to the pseudouridine synthase family, which introduces Ψ residues into RNA through an enzyme activity requiring conserved aspartate residues (e.g., D48, D90 in E. coli TruB) . In Burkholderia phytofirmans, recombinant TruA (UniProt: B2T9N4) is expressed in E. coli and retains enzymatic activity, targeting tRNA substrates . Key features include:

  • Molecular Weight: ~35 kDa (predicted from sequence data) .

  • Catalytic Mechanism: Base-flipping to access uridine, followed by glycosidic bond rotation .

  • Conserved Motifs: K64 for RNA binding and D48/D90 for catalysis .

3.1. Enzyme Activity-Independent Functions

  • TruA homologs (e.g., TruB1 in humans) regulate RNA processing independently of pseudouridylation. For example, TruB1 binds pri-let-7 miRNA to enhance maturation without modifying uridine .

  • In Burkholderia, TruA’s RNA-binding activity may similarly stabilize tRNA or other non-coding RNAs during stress .

3.2. Symbiotic Relevance

  • While B. phymatum’s nitrogen-fixing symbiosis relies on nif and nod genes , TruA’s role in symbiosis remains uncharacterized.

  • Mutational studies in related rhizobia suggest tRNA modifications are critical for stress adaptation and host interaction .

Recombinant Expression and Purification

  • Expression System: E. coli BL21(DE3) .

  • Purification: Affinity chromatography yields >85% purity (SDS-PAGE verified) .

  • Sequence: 206 amino acids with conserved catalytic motifs (e.g., MKRIALGVQY...) .

Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions

  • No direct studies on B. phymatum TruA exist. Current data derive from homologs like B. phytofirmans TruA and human TruB1 .

  • Open questions:

    • Does TruA influence B. phymatum’s symbiosis via tRNA modification?

    • How does pseudouridylation interact with nitrogen fixation pathways?

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. Note: We will prioritize shipping the format we have in stock. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery information. Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; additional charges will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50% for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
truA; Bphy_4372tRNA pseudouridine synthase A; EC 5.4.99.12; tRNA pseudouridine(38-40) synthase; tRNA pseudouridylate synthase I; tRNA-uridine isomerase I
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-267
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Paraburkholderia phymatum (strain DSM 17167 / CIP 108236 / LMG 21445 / STM815) (Burkholderia phymatum)
Target Names
truA
Target Protein Sequence
MTRIALGIQY DGAAFCGWQS QPHGKTVQDE LERALREFAL TPLQTVVAGR TDTGVHGLGQ VVHFDTELDR AEFSWVRGTN AFLPSTVAVQ WAKPMPDAFH ARFSAFERTY YYALYVHPVR SPMLASRAGW IHTPLDVDAM REAAACLIGE HDFSAFRSSE CQSKTPVKHL YQIDIRPQGD FIHFRFRANA FLHHMVRNLM GCLVAVGRGR YPAAWLSEVL HGRDRNRAAP TFMPDGLYLA QVGYPETFAV PAPQAGSVPW STVWTDS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Forms pseudouridine at positions 38, 39, and 40 in the anticodon stem and loop of transfer RNAs.
Database Links
Protein Families
TRNA pseudouridine synthase TruA family

Q&A

What is the structural and functional role of tRNA pseudouridine synthase A (truA) in bacteria?

tRNA pseudouridine synthase A (truA) catalyzes the conversion of uridine to pseudouridine at positions 38, 39, and/or 40 in the anticodon stem-loop (ASL) of tRNA. The enzyme contains a completely conserved active site aspartate that is crucial for its catalytic mechanism, suggesting this mechanism is shared across the pseudouridine synthase family. The Thermus thermophilus TruA structure reveals flexible features in the tRNA-binding cleft that facilitate primary tRNA interaction, with charged residues in the cleft guiding tRNA to the active site .

What characterizes Burkholderia phymatum as a bacterial species?

Burkholderia phymatum is a nitrogen-fixing beta-rhizobium capable of nodulating legume plants, including Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean). Phylogenetic analysis including 30 Burkholderia reference strains has shown that strains from root nodules of P. vulgaris form a tight cluster with B. phymatum . The B. phymatum genome contains two complete Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) clusters that, according to classification by Angus et al. (2014), are not associated with pathogenicity . These secretion systems play important roles in interbacterial competition both in vitro and in vivo, giving B. phymatum competitive advantages in soil environments.

How do tRNA modifications impact bacterial physiology?

tRNA modifications like those catalyzed by truA play critical roles in translation accuracy, efficiency, and fidelity. The conversion of uridine to pseudouridine in the anticodon stem-loop affects tRNA structure and function, potentially influencing:

  • Codon recognition accuracy

  • Translation speed and efficiency

  • tRNA stability and folding

  • Bacterial adaptation to environmental changes

A conformational change of the substrate tRNA appears necessary to facilitate access to the active site aspartate residue deep within the cleft of the enzyme .

What expression systems are recommended for producing recombinant B. phymatum truA?

For successful expression of recombinant B. phymatum truA:

  • Vector selection: pET expression systems with T7 promoters are commonly used for controlled, high-yield expression

  • Host strains: E. coli BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains for efficient expression of proteins with rare codons

  • Induction conditions: Optimize IPTG concentration (typically 0.1-1.0 mM) and temperature (16-37°C)

  • Protein solubility: Consider fusion tags (His, GST, MBP) to enhance solubility and facilitate purification

For structural studies similar to those performed with T. thermophilus TruA, purification to homogeneity followed by crystallization trials would be essential for X-ray crystallography analysis .

What methods are effective for measuring truA enzyme activity?

MethodPrincipleAdvantagesLimitations
Radioisotope assaysDetection of [3H] or [14C] release during pseudouridine formationHigh sensitivity, quantitativeRequires radioactive materials, specialized equipment
HPLC analysisSeparation and detection of modified nucleosidesGood resolution, multiple modifications can be detectedSample preparation intensive, requires standards
Mass spectrometryDetection of mass shift after modificationHigh precision, no radioactivity neededExpensive equipment, complex data analysis
Antibody-based detectionUse of anti-pseudouridine antibodiesCan be used for in situ detectionLimited specificity, semi-quantitative

How can researchers create and validate truA mutants in B. phymatum?

Based on methodologies used for T6SS mutants in B. phymatum , a systematic approach would include:

  • Target selection: Identify conserved catalytic residues based on sequence alignments with characterized truA enzymes

  • Mutagenesis strategy: Insertional mutagenesis or CRISPR-Cas9 editing

  • Verification: PCR confirmation, sequencing, and Western blot analysis

  • Growth assessment: Compare mutant growth to wild-type in rich and minimal media conditions

  • Phenotypic characterization: Assess effects on tRNA modification, translation fidelity, and symbiotic capabilities

How do researchers address contradictory findings in truA research?

Resolving contradictions in research follows a systematic framework derived from literature analysis methods :

  • Identification stage: Use semantic predication analysis to identify potentially contradictory claims about truA function

  • Categorization of contradictions:

    • Internal patient/system factors (species differences, genetic backgrounds)

    • External experimental factors (methodologies, conditions)

    • Endogenous/exogenous influences

    • Known controversies in the field

    • Actual contradictions requiring resolution

  • Resolution approach:

    • Standardize experimental conditions and methodologies

    • Account for biological variables in experimental design

    • Use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate evidence quality

    • Design critical experiments that directly test competing hypotheses

This approach can systematically address the 2.6% of apparent contradictions that represent true scientific disagreements requiring resolution .

What is the relationship between truA function and stress response in bacteria?

RNA modifications often play crucial roles in bacterial stress responses. For B. phymatum, which must adapt to various environmental conditions during free-living and symbiotic stages, truA likely contributes to stress adaptation through:

Research approaches could include:

  • Exposing wild-type and truA mutant strains to various stressors (oxidative, acidic, osmotic)

  • Measuring survival rates, growth curves, and protein synthesis under stress conditions

  • Comparing transcriptomes and proteomes to identify differentially expressed genes/proteins

How can researchers effectively analyze truA activity data across different experimental conditions?

Following best practices from behavioral research data management :

This structured approach enables robust statistical analysis and visualization of truA activity patterns .

What bioinformatic approaches can identify potential truA substrates in B. phymatum?

A multi-layered bioinformatic approach would include:

  • Sequence-based prediction:

    • Identify all tRNA genes in B. phymatum genome

    • Analyze anticodon stem-loop sequences for conservation patterns

    • Compare with known truA substrate features from model organisms

  • Structural analysis:

    • Model tRNA secondary structures to identify structural determinants

    • Perform docking simulations with truA homology models

    • Predict accessibility of potential modification sites

  • Comparative genomics:

    • Analyze truA and tRNA conservation across related Burkholderia species

    • Identify co-evolution patterns between truA and potential substrate tRNAs

Analysis TypeToolsExpected Outcomes
tRNA gene identificationtRNAscan-SE, ARAGORNComplete tRNA repertoire
Sequence motif analysisMEME, GLAM2Conserved sequence patterns
Secondary structureRNAfold, tRNAdbStructural features of potential substrates
Homology modelingSWISS-MODEL, Phyre2B. phymatum truA structural model
Molecular dockingHADDOCK, AutoDockPrediction of truA-tRNA interactions

How might truA interact with other RNA modification systems in B. phymatum?

RNA modification enzymes often work in coordination to produce the complete modification landscape. Future research could explore:

  • Modification networks: Identify other tRNA modification enzymes in B. phymatum and map their functional relationships

  • Sequential modifications: Determine if truA-catalyzed pseudouridylation precedes or follows other modifications

  • Regulatory interactions: Investigate whether truA activity is regulated by or regulates other RNA modification pathways

These interactions could be particularly important in stress conditions or during symbiosis establishment.

What role might truA play in B. phymatum's competitive fitness in soil environments?

Given B. phymatum's use of T6SS for interbacterial competition , truA could contribute to competitive fitness through:

  • Translation optimization: Enhancing protein synthesis efficiency for rapid responses to competitors

  • Stress adaptation: Improving survival under competitive stress conditions

  • Symbiotic efficiency: Enhancing nodulation speed or efficiency, similar to how T6SS affects nodulation competition

Research could compare the competitive index of wild-type and truA mutant strains in mixed soil populations using methods similar to those employed for T6SS competition studies .

How does truA structure in B. phymatum compare to that of other bacterial species?

Based on structural information from T. thermophilus TruA , comparative analysis could:

  • Generate homology models of B. phymatum truA using the T. thermophilus structure as template

  • Identify conserved and divergent regions, particularly in the tRNA-binding cleft

  • Predict species-specific substrate interactions

  • Design experiments to test structural hypotheses through site-directed mutagenesis

The remarkably flexible structural features in the tRNA-binding cleft identified in T. thermophilus truA may show interesting variations in B. phymatum that reflect its specific biological niche and tRNA substrates.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.