KEGG: bxb:DR64_7297
STRING: 266265.Bxe_B1996
Bxeno_B1021 (also known as Bxe_B1996) is a UPF0060 family membrane protein from Paraburkholderia xenovorans (formerly classified as Burkholderia xenovorans). The full-length protein consists of 106 amino acids with the sequence: MKTFLLYAVTAVAEIVGCYLPWRWLKEGGSIWLLVPGALSLALFAWLLTLHGTAAGRVYAAYGGVYVAVAIAWLWCVDKVRPTLWDAAGVVFTLAGMAIIAFQPRV . As suggested by its hydrophobic amino acid composition, Bxeno_B1021 is an integral membrane protein with multiple transmembrane regions. The protein is identified in the UniProt database with the accession number Q13PK0 .
When expressed recombinantly, the protein is typically fused with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). The presence of multiple hydrophobic domains suggests that this protein is embedded within cellular membranes, which influences both experimental approaches and functional hypotheses.
For research applications, Bxeno_B1021 is primarily expressed in E. coli expression systems optimized for membrane protein production . The selection of an appropriate expression system is critical due to the membrane-embedded nature of the protein, which can lead to toxicity, aggregation, or misfolding in standard expression systems.
When working with this protein, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
Using specialized E. coli strains (such as C41/C43 or BL21-AI) designed for membrane protein expression
Optimizing induction conditions (lower temperatures, reduced IPTG concentrations)
Supplementing with specific membrane-stabilizing additives
Employing fusion partners that enhance membrane insertion and stability
While E. coli remains the predominant expression system as documented in the literature, advanced research may explore alternative expression systems such as insect cells or yeast when native-like membrane composition is required for structural or functional studies .
Maintaining structural integrity and functionality of Bxeno_B1021 requires careful attention to storage and reconstitution protocols. Based on experimental evidence, the following approach is recommended:
Storage Protocol:
Store lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
For working solutions, store at 4°C for no more than one week
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they significantly diminish protein integrity
Reconstitution Protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to collect contents
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (typically 50%) for long-term storage
Aliquot to minimize freeze-thaw cycles and store at -20°C/-80°C
The reconstitution buffer composition may need modification depending on downstream applications. Researchers investigating protein-lipid interactions or structural studies may require specific detergents or lipid mixtures to maintain native conformation during reconstitution.
Efficient extraction and purification of membrane proteins like Bxeno_B1021 requires specialized approaches to maintain structural integrity while achieving high purity. Recommended methodology includes:
Extraction Protocol:
Harvest cells expressing Bxeno_B1021 at optimal density
Resuspend in buffer containing protease inhibitors
Disrupt cell membranes using methods such as sonication or high-pressure homogenization
Isolate membrane fractions through differential centrifugation
Solubilize membrane proteins using appropriate detergents (typically non-ionic detergents like DDM, LDAO, or OG)
Purification Considerations:
Leverage the His-tag for IMAC purification
Consider detergent exchange during purification to optimize stability
Implement size exclusion chromatography as a final polishing step
Monitor protein quality using analytical techniques (e.g., SDS-PAGE, Western blot, mass spectrometry)
Researchers working with this protein should be aware that extraction efficiency is highly dependent on detergent selection. Preliminary screening of multiple detergents is often necessary to identify optimal conditions for specific downstream applications .
Understanding the precise membrane topology and subcellular localization of Bxeno_B1021 is essential for functional characterization. Advanced techniques recommended for these studies include:
Membrane Topology Analysis:
Cysteine scanning mutagenesis: Systematic replacement of residues with cysteine followed by accessibility testing with membrane-impermeable thiol-reactive reagents
Protease protection assays: Controlled proteolytic digestion with domain-specific antibody detection
Fluorescence approaches: Position-specific fluorescent labeling combined with quencher accessibility studies
Localization Studies:
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Using antibodies against the His-tag or the protein itself
Fluorescent protein fusions: Creating GFP/RFP fusions for live-cell imaging
Subcellular fractionation: Paired with Western blot analysis for biochemical verification
For in vivo studies, researchers might consider adapting the glycocapture method described for blood-brain barrier proteins, which demonstrates high specificity for cell surface proteins, especially those that are glycosylated . This approach could be particularly valuable if Bxeno_B1021 is found to have glycosylation modifications in its native context.
Identifying binding partners and protein-protein interactions is crucial for elucidating the functional role of Bxeno_B1021. Several complementary approaches are recommended:
In vitro Interaction Studies:
Pull-down assays: Utilizing the His-tag on recombinant Bxeno_B1021
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): For quantitative binding kinetics
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC): For thermodynamic parameters of interactions
In vivo Interaction Studies:
Proximity labeling approaches: BioID or APEX2 fusions to identify proximal proteins
Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry (XL-MS): For capturing transient interactions
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): For monitoring interactions in living cells
For membrane proteins like Bxeno_B1021, maintaining the native membrane environment is particularly challenging. Researchers should consider reconstituting the protein in nanodiscs or liposomes for interaction studies to preserve physiologically relevant conformations and interaction interfaces .
Despite being classified as a UPF0060 family protein with unknown function, several systematic approaches can help elucidate the physiological role of Bxeno_B1021:
Genetic Approaches:
Gene knockout/knockdown: Analyzing phenotypic consequences of Bxeno_B1021 deletion
Complementation studies: Rescuing knockout phenotypes with wild-type and mutant variants
Conditional expression systems: Investigating effects of protein depletion or overexpression
Physiological Characterization:
Stress response assays: Testing sensitivity to various environmental stressors
Membrane integrity analyses: Assessing permeability and potential transporter functions
Metabolomic profiling: Identifying metabolic pathways affected by Bxeno_B1021 manipulation
Since search result indicates that Bxeno_B1021 participates in several biological pathways, researchers should consider systematic phenotypic screening approaches. Cross-referencing experimental findings with bioinformatic predictions can narrow down potential functional hypotheses for targeted investigation.
Determining the three-dimensional structure of membrane proteins like Bxeno_B1021 presents significant challenges. The following approaches represent current best practices:
Sample Preparation Strategies:
Detergent screening: Systematic evaluation of detergents for stability and homogeneity
Lipid cubic phase crystallization: For maintaining membrane-like environment
Nanodiscs or amphipols: For detergent-free stabilization
Structural Determination Methods:
X-ray crystallography: Requires high-quality crystals, challenging for membrane proteins
Cryo-electron microscopy: Increasingly powerful for membrane protein structures
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Suitable for smaller membrane proteins or domains
Complementary Approaches:
Molecular dynamics simulations: For refining structures and studying dynamics
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry: For probing conformational changes
Cross-linking studies: For constraining structural models
Given the relatively small size of Bxeno_B1021 (106 amino acids), solution NMR might be feasible if sufficient quantities of isotopically-labeled protein can be produced in a suitable membrane mimetic environment .
Understanding the evolutionary context of Bxeno_B1021 can provide valuable insights into its function. A comprehensive comparative analysis should include:
Sequence Analysis:
| Species | Protein Identifier | Sequence Identity (%) | Predicted Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paraburkholderia xenovorans | Bxeno_B1021 (Q13PK0) | 100 | UPF0060 membrane protein |
| Related Burkholderia species | Various | 80-95 (estimated) | UPF0060 membrane protein |
| Other β-proteobacteria | Various | 50-75 (estimated) | UPF0060 membrane protein |
| Distantly related bacteria | Various | 30-45 (estimated) | May have annotated functions |
Structural Conservation:
Analyze predicted transmembrane topology across homologs
Identify conserved motifs or residues for targeted mutagenesis
Examine co-evolution patterns to predict functional interfaces
Genomic Context Analysis:
Investigate neighboring genes across species
Identify conserved operon structures
Look for co-occurrence patterns with functionally characterized genes
This comparative approach can reveal conserved features that have been maintained through evolutionary pressure, suggesting functional importance. Combined with experimental data, these analyses can guide hypothesis generation for functional studies .
To conduct comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of Bxeno_B1021, researchers should utilize a combination of specialized tools and databases:
Sequence Analysis Tools:
BLAST/PSI-BLAST: For identifying homologs across species
Multiple Sequence Alignment tools: MUSCLE, CLUSTAL, T-Coffee
Phylogenetic analysis: RAxML, MrBayes, PhyML
Structural Prediction Resources:
Transmembrane topology: TMHMM, TOPCONS, Phobius
Secondary structure: PSIPRED, JPred
Tertiary structure: AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, I-TASSER
Functional Prediction Tools:
InterProScan: For domain and family identification
STRING: For protein-protein interaction networks
KEGG/BioCyc: For metabolic pathway mapping
Specialized Membrane Protein Resources:
MemProtMD: For membrane protein simulations
OPM database: For orientation of proteins in membranes
PDBTM: Transmembrane protein structure database
By integrating results from these resources, researchers can develop testable hypotheses about structure-function relationships, potential interaction partners, and physiological roles of Bxeno_B1021 .
Membrane proteins like Bxeno_B1021 present specific challenges in recombinant expression and purification. The following troubleshooting approaches address common issues:
Expression Challenges:
| Issue | Potential Solutions |
|---|---|
| Low expression levels | Try lower induction temperatures (16-20°C) Use specialized expression strains Optimize codon usage for expression host |
| Protein toxicity | Use tightly controlled inducible promoters Express as fusion with soluble partners Consider cell-free expression systems |
| Inclusion body formation | Co-express with chaperones Include solubilizing agents in media Optimize membrane insertion with signal sequences |
Purification Challenges:
| Issue | Potential Solutions |
|---|---|
| Poor solubilization | Screen various detergents and concentrations Try milder solubilization conditions Consider native nanodiscs extraction |
| Aggregation during purification | Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids) Maintain consistent detergent concentration Optimize buffer components (pH, salt concentration) |
| Low purity | Implement multiple purification steps Consider on-column detergent exchange Use size exclusion as final polishing step |
Researchers should implement systematic optimization strategies rather than changing multiple variables simultaneously, documenting conditions that improve protein quality and yield .
Ensuring the quality of purified Bxeno_B1021 is critical for reliable downstream experiments. A comprehensive quality control workflow should include:
Basic Characterization:
Western blotting: For identity confirmation
Mass spectrometry: For accurate mass determination and sequence verification
Functional Validation:
Circular dichroism: For secondary structure assessment
Fluorescence spectroscopy: For tertiary structure evaluation
Size exclusion chromatography: For oligomeric state analysis
Stability Assessment:
Thermal shift assays: For determining thermal stability
Time-course activity/structure measurements: For monitoring stability over time
Detergent/lipid optimization: For identifying stabilizing conditions
For membrane proteins like Bxeno_B1021, additional specialized quality control may include reconstitution into proteoliposomes or nanodiscs to verify proper membrane insertion and functional state. Researchers should establish acceptance criteria for each quality parameter before proceeding to functional or structural studies .
Several cutting-edge methodologies show promise for deeper characterization of membrane proteins like Bxeno_B1021:
Advanced Structural Approaches:
Microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED): For structure determination from nano-sized crystals
Integrative structural biology: Combining multiple data types (cross-linking, HDX-MS, cryo-EM) for comprehensive models
Serial crystallography: Using X-ray free-electron lasers for room-temperature structures
Functional Genomics:
CRISPRi/CRISPRa systems: For precise control of gene expression in native contexts
RNA-seq and Ribo-seq: For transcriptomic and translational impacts of Bxeno_B1021 modulation
Metabolic flux analysis: For determining effects on cellular metabolism
Single-molecule approaches:
Single-molecule FRET: For conformational dynamics
High-speed AFM: For visualizing structural changes in real-time
Nanopore recording: If Bxeno_B1021 has channel or transport functions
The novel glycocapture approach described in search result could potentially be adapted for studying Bxeno_B1021 in its native membrane environment, providing insights into its accessibility and potential interactions with extracellular factors .
Investigation of Bxeno_B1021 has potential implications for several important areas of bacterial membrane biology:
Fundamental Membrane Protein Biology:
Insights into membrane protein folding and stability
Understanding of protein-lipid interactions in bacterial membranes
Models for membrane protein evolution and specialization
Bacterial Physiology:
Potential roles in membrane organization or compartmentalization
Contributions to stress response or environmental adaptation
Involvement in signaling across bacterial membranes
Comparative Microbiology:
Functional conservation across bacterial species
Species-specific adaptations of membrane proteomes
Evolution of specialized membrane functions
While the specific function of Bxeno_B1021 remains to be fully characterized, systematic investigation using the approaches outlined in this FAQ will contribute to our understanding of this protein family and potentially reveal new aspects of bacterial membrane biology .