Recombinant Cancer pagurus Cuticle protein CP466

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Cancer pagurus Cuticular Proteins

Cuticular proteins in Cancer pagurus (rock crab) are critical components of the exoskeleton, contributing to structural integrity, calcification, and molting. Key domains identified include:

  • Cuticle_1: Associated with calcified regions of the exoskeleton .

  • Chitin_bind_4 (RR consensus): Mediates chitin binding in both calcified and uncalcified cuticles .

  • PfamB_109992: A domain linked to CPCP1876, a specific C. pagurus cuticle protein .

CPs like CPCP1158 (P81580) and CPCP1876 (P81584) are well-characterized in C. pagurus, with transcriptomic studies revealing differential expression across molting stages . These proteins are often recombinantly expressed to study their roles in biomineralization and structural resilience.

Recombinant Production of Crustacean Cuticular Proteins

Recombinant CPs are typically produced using heterologous systems (e.g., E. coli or insect cells) for functional studies. Key steps include:

  1. Gene Cloning: Isolating the target CP gene (e.g., from C. pagurus cDNA libraries).

  2. Vector Design: Incorporating affinity tags (e.g., His-tag) for purification.

  3. Expression and Purification: Optimizing conditions for solubility and yield .

For example, CPCP434 (P81585), a homolog in C. pagurus, shares structural features with CP466 and has been studied for its interaction with chitin and calcium ions .

Research Applications

Recombinant C. pagurus CPs have been utilized in:

  • Biomimetic materials: Developing lightweight, durable composites inspired by crustacean exoskeletons .

  • Pathogen resistance: Studying CP interactions with bacterial pathogens (e.g., shell disease in C. pagurus) .

  • Molting regulation: Identifying CPs as biomarkers for aquaculture management .

Data Gaps and Future Directions

Direct references to CP466 are absent in the provided sources, suggesting:

  • Potential nomenclature discrepancies (e.g., CP434 vs. CP466).

  • Need for targeted proteomic or transcriptomic studies to confirm CP466’s existence and function.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format unless you specify a format preference when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Contact your local distributor for specific delivery details. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice shipment in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon arrival. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
Cuticle protein CP466; CPCP466
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-44
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Cancer pagurus (Rock crab)
Target Protein Sequence
EVLLEGPSGV LFKDGQKKYL PPGVKIVLLT ESGAVLSNGD NVQF
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Cuticle protein CP466 in Cancer pagurus?

Cuticle protein CP466 (CPCP466) is a small structural protein found in the calcified shell (carapace cuticle) of Cancer pagurus (Rock crab). It belongs to a family of cuticle proteins that contribute to the physical properties of the crustacean exoskeleton. CPCP466 is specifically associated with the calcified regions of the cuticle, as evidenced by its tissue specificity in the calcified shell . This 44-amino acid protein has a molecular weight of 4655.9 Da (as determined by plasma desorption mass spectrometry) . As part of the exoskeletal matrix, CPCP466 works alongside other cuticular proteins to maintain structural integrity of the crab's carapace.

What is the molecular structure and organization of CP466?

CPCP466 is a relatively small protein consisting of 44 amino acids with a molecular weight of 4657 MW . The protein contains two distinct repeat regions: Repeat 1 (amino acids 3-20) and Repeat 2 (amino acids 27-44) . The complete amino acid sequence is: EVLLEGPSGV LFKDGQKKYL PPGVKIVLLT ESGAVLSNGD NVQF . This sequence organization suggests functional domains that may interact with other cuticle components. Unlike some other cuticle proteins that contain the cuticle_1 domain (found in 13 different cuticle proteins in Portunus pelagicus) or the chitin_bind_4 domain (found in 4 different cuticle proteins), CP466 appears to share characteristics with proteins containing the PfamB_109992 domain previously identified in Cancer pagurus .

How does CP466 expression change during the molt cycle?

Based on studies of related cuticle proteins, CP466 likely shows differential expression throughout the molt cycle, similar to the pattern observed in other cuticle proteins from crustaceans. Research in Portunus pelagicus has identified 21 distinct cuticle protein transcripts that show molt cycle-related differential expression . Cuticle proteins with domains similar to those in Cancer pagurus (like CP1158, CP1876, and CP434) show specific temporal expression patterns coordinated with the synthesis of new cuticle . Some cuticle proteins are upregulated during pre-molt and post-molt stages when new cuticle formation occurs, while others show increased expression during intermoult when the exoskeleton is fully formed and hardened . To precisely determine CP466's expression pattern, quantitative PCR analysis across molt stages would be necessary.

What expression systems are optimal for producing recombinant CP466?

For recombinant expression of Cancer pagurus proteins, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems have been utilized. Based on experience with other crustacean proteins, Escherichia coli and insect cell lines are viable options. E. coli systems offer high yield and cost-effectiveness, while insect cell lines may provide better post-translational modifications and proper protein folding.
When expressing CP466, special consideration should be given to:

  • Codon optimization for the chosen expression system

  • Fusion tags for improved solubility and purification (His-tag, GST, or MBP)

  • Expression conditions that minimize protein aggregation

  • Refolding protocols if the protein forms inclusion bodies in E. coli
    The critical challenge in recombinant production of cuticle proteins is ensuring proper folding and disulfide bond formation, which are essential for their native structure and function.

What purification strategies are effective for recombinant CP466?

Purification of recombinant CP466 should follow a multi-step approach:

  • Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using fusion tags (His-tag, GST) for selective binding

  • Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography leveraging CP466's charged properties

  • Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography to separate aggregates and achieve high purity
    When designing purification protocols, researchers should account for CP466's small size (44 amino acids, 4.7 kDa) , which may affect binding efficiency and elution characteristics. Purification under native conditions is preferable to preserve structural integrity, though refolding from inclusion bodies may be necessary if expression yields insoluble protein. Quality control should include mass spectrometry verification against the expected molecular weight of 4655.9 Da and functional assays to confirm proper folding.

What techniques are suitable for studying CP466 integration into chitin matrices?

Investigating CP466's integration into chitin matrices requires specialized approaches:

  • In vitro reconstitution assays: Mixing purified recombinant CP466 with chitin fibrils under controlled conditions to assess binding kinetics and structural changes.

  • Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): Visualizing the ultrastructure of chitin matrices with and without CP466 to determine morphological effects.

  • Atomic force microscopy (AFM): Measuring nanomechanical properties of reconstituted chitin-CP466 complexes to assess functional contributions.

  • Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D): Quantifying binding dynamics between CP466 and chitin surfaces in real-time.

  • Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP): Using fluorescently-labeled CP466 to study mobility and exchange within chitin matrices.
    These methods would provide insights into how CP466 contributes to the structural integrity of the crab exoskeleton, particularly in calcified regions where it is predominantly expressed .

How can researchers assess the role of CP466 in biomineralization?

CP466's presence in calcified shell tissue suggests involvement in biomineralization processes. To investigate this function, researchers should consider:

  • In vitro mineralization assays: Testing whether recombinant CP466 affects calcium carbonate crystal nucleation, growth, or morphology.

  • Calcium binding assays: Determining if CP466 directly binds calcium ions using techniques like isothermal titration calorimetry.

  • Comparative expression analysis: Quantifying CP466 expression levels in calcified versus non-calcified tissues to confirm specific association with mineralized structures.

  • Knockdown studies: Using RNAi approaches in cell culture systems to assess changes in mineralization capacity when CP466 expression is reduced.

  • Structural studies: Investigating how CP466 might create binding sites for minerals through its repeated sequences (amino acids 3-20 and 27-44) .
    Analysis of related cuticle proteins in Portunus pelagicus showed differential expression patterns correlating with calcification timing , suggesting CP466 may follow similar temporal regulation during shell formation and hardening.

How do environmental factors affect CP466 expression in Cancer pagurus?

Environmental factors likely influence CP466 expression, as cuticle proteins are responsive to ecological conditions. Research approaches should include:

  • Environmental exposure experiments: Subjecting crabs to varying conditions (temperature, pH, pollutants) and quantifying CP466 expression changes.

  • Seasonal sampling: Analyzing CP466 levels across seasons to identify natural variation patterns.

  • Climate change models: Investigating how predicted ocean acidification or warming might affect CP466 expression and function.
    Recent research has shown that elevated pCO₂ affects physiological responses in Cancer pagurus , suggesting that changing ocean chemistry may impact cuticle protein expression. Additionally, studies on biodegradable plastic hydrolysis by Cancer pagurus gastric enzymes highlight how this species responds biochemically to environmental exposures , indicating potential adaptability in protein expression patterns.

What protocols are recommended for isolating native CP466 from Cancer pagurus?

Isolation of native CP466 from Cancer pagurus tissue requires specific extraction protocols:

  • Tissue selection: Target calcified shell tissue, specifically the carapace cuticle where CP466 is expressed .

  • Initial extraction: Decalcify shell fragments using EDTA solution (pH 7.4) to remove calcium carbonate while preserving protein structure.

  • Protein solubilization: Extract proteins using denaturing buffers containing urea or guanidine hydrochloride, followed by renaturation.

  • Fractionation: Apply size exclusion chromatography to separate low molecular weight proteins like CP466 (4.7 kDa) .

  • Identification: Confirm identity using mass spectrometry to match the known molecular weight of 4655.9 Da .
    These methods align with techniques used to identify CP466 initially through plasma desorption mass spectrometry . For quantitative isolation, establishing a purification scheme similar to that used for other Cancer pagurus cuticle proteins (CP1158, CP1876, CP434) would be advisable .

How can researchers verify proper folding of recombinant CP466?

Verifying proper folding of recombinant CP466 is critical for functional studies. Recommended methods include:

  • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: Assess secondary structure elements and compare with predicted models.

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy: For detailed structural analysis of this small protein (44 amino acids) .

  • Functional binding assays: Test interaction with known binding partners as a functional verification of correct folding.

  • Limited proteolysis: Properly folded proteins typically show resistance to proteolytic digestion compared to misfolded variants.

  • Mass spectrometry: Analyze disulfide bond formation if present in the native structure.
    Although structural data specifically for CP466 is limited, comparison with homologous proteins can guide expectations for proper folding characteristics. Alternatively, researchers could use AlphaFold predictions as noted in database entries to generate structural models for comparison with experimental data.

How does CP466 compare to other cuticle proteins in Cancer pagurus?

Cancer pagurus possesses multiple cuticle proteins with distinct characteristics:

Cuticle ProteinSize (aa)Molecular Weight (Da)Domain TypeFunction
CP466 (CPCP466)444,657Contains 2 repeatsStructural component of calcified shell
CP1158 (CPCP1158)~100*~10,000*cuticle_1Structural role in cuticle formation
CP1876 (CPCP1876)~190*~19,000*PfamB_109992Component of cuticle matrix
CP434 (CPCP434)~40*~4,300*Similar to CP466Structural role in exoskeleton
*Estimated values based on comparable proteins in research literature
These proteins show differential expression during the molt cycle, suggesting complementary roles in cuticle formation and maintenance . While some cuticle proteins like those containing the chitin_bind_4 domain directly interact with chitin fibrils, others like CP466 may contribute to matrix organization or mineralization processes. The presence of repeat regions in CP466 (amino acids 3-20 and 27-44) suggests potential self-assembly or specific interaction sites with other cuticle components.

What can we learn from studying CP466 compared to cuticle proteins in other crustaceans?

Comparative analysis of CP466 with cuticle proteins from other crustaceans provides evolutionary and functional insights:

  • Evolutionary conservation: Examining homologs across crustacean species can reveal conserved functional domains and species-specific adaptations.

  • Domain organization: Unlike the 13 proteins containing cuticle_1 domains or 4 proteins with chitin_bind_4 domains found in Portunus pelagicus , CP466 contains unique repeat structures that may reflect specialized functions.

  • Expression patterns: Research in Portunus pelagicus revealed stage-specific expression patterns of cuticle proteins during molting , suggesting CP466 may follow similar temporal regulation coordinated with the molt cycle.

  • Biomineralization roles: Comparing CP466 with proteins from other calcifying crustaceans could illuminate common mechanisms of shell hardening and mineralization.

  • Environmental adaptation: Analyzing cuticle protein variation across species from different habitats may reveal adaptations to specific environmental pressures.
    Studies of crustacean cuticle proteins indicate that these molecules evolved to support diverse exoskeletal properties, from flexibility to hardness, depending on body location and ecological niche .

What are promising research frontiers for CP466 and related cuticle proteins?

Several promising research directions could advance understanding of CP466:

  • Structural biology: Determining the three-dimensional structure of CP466 using X-ray crystallography or NMR would provide insights into its functional mechanisms.

  • Biomimetic applications: Investigating how CP466's properties could inform the development of bio-inspired materials with controlled mineralization.

  • Climate change impacts: Assessing how ocean acidification affects CP466 expression and function, given the vulnerability of calcified structures to changing ocean chemistry.

  • Comparative genomics: Analyzing CP466 homologs across crustacean species to track evolutionary conservation and specialization.

  • Synthetic biology: Engineering modified versions of CP466 with enhanced properties for materials science applications.
    These research avenues would build upon the foundation of knowledge about CP466's basic structure (44 amino acids with two repeat regions) and its presence in calcified shell tissue, expanding into new applications and ecological contexts.

What technical challenges remain in CP466 research?

Several technical challenges persist in CP466 research:

  • Expression optimization: Developing systems that produce correctly folded recombinant CP466 in sufficient quantities for structural and functional studies.

  • Functional assays: Establishing reliable assays to measure CP466's specific contributions to cuticle properties and mineralization.

  • In vivo studies: Creating methodologies to study CP466 function in living organisms, potentially through gene editing or knockdown approaches.

  • Interaction mapping: Identifying the complete network of molecular interactions involving CP466 within the cuticle matrix.

  • Environmental relevance: Connecting molecular-level understanding of CP466 to ecosystem-level impacts of environmental change on crab populations . Addressing these challenges will require interdisciplinary approaches combining molecular biology, biochemistry, materials science, and ecology to fully understand CP466's role in crustacean biology.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.