Recombinant Candida boidinii Peroxisomal membrane protein PMP30A (PEX11A)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies depending on purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a shelf life of 6 months at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form has a shelf life of 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process. If you require a specific tag type, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
PEX11A; PMP30A; PMP31; Peroxisomal membrane protein PMP30A; Peroxin-11A; Peroxisomal membrane protein PMP31
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-256
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Candida boidinii (Yeast)
Target Names
PEX11A
Target Protein Sequence
MVYGELIYHP VVTKLLKFLD SSASREKLLR LLQYLCRFLT YYTFRRNINI ETIQLIKKIQ SSIAISRKPL RFLKNLPHLK NLNKIYSNEL LDSTIRIGDL IKNFGYALYF QFDTLQWLKL LGLLTSKNSG ALYFKVDKLA ANFWLIGLTG SIITDLRNLK ISYDSNKALL NEINSQEKTD GSITSDEKLI VQNNELILKN NEKINLNKRD LFKNVLDSLI ALKGSQLIDL NDGVLGFAGI ITSIIGIEDI WNATKA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Involved in peroxisomal proliferation. May participate in peroxisomal elongation or fission and be involved in dividing peroxisomes into regular units.
Protein Families
Peroxin-11 family
Subcellular Location
Peroxisome membrane; Peripheral membrane protein.

Q&A

What is PMP30A and what is its relationship to PEX11A?

PMP30A (formerly designated as PMP31) is a peroxisomal membrane protein in the methylotrophic yeast Candida boidinii that is strongly induced by diverse peroxisome proliferators such as methanol, oleate, and D-alanine . It belongs to the peroxin-11 (PEX11) family of proteins that are involved in peroxisome proliferation across eukaryotes . PMP30A is specifically the C. boidinii homolog of the more broadly named PEX11 proteins found across species, with the human homolog being termed PEX11A . The protein contains 256 amino acids and is predicted to span the peroxisomal membrane once or twice, with a highly basic charge (predicted isoelectric point above 10) .

What is the primary function of PMP30A/PEX11A in peroxisome biology?

PMP30A plays a direct role in peroxisome proliferation and regulation of organelle size rather than functioning in specific peroxisomal metabolic pathways . The protein promotes membrane protrusion and elongation on the peroxisomal surface, which is an essential step preceding organelle division . When PMP30 is disrupted in C. boidinii, cells exhibit significantly inhibited growth on methanol and develop fewer, larger, and more spherical peroxisomes when grown in both methanol and oleate media . This phenotype clearly demonstrates that PMP30A functions in remodeling peroxisomal membranes during proliferation events rather than participating directly in metabolic functions within the organelle.

How does PMP30A contribute to the mechanism of peroxisome proliferation?

PMP30A contributes to peroxisome proliferation through a sequential process that begins with membrane remodeling. Based on research findings, PMP30A likely functions early in the peroxisome division cycle by promoting membrane protrusion and elongation on the peroxisomal surface . In synchronized cell cultures, peroxisomes sequentially enlarge, elongate, and then double in number, which correlates with peaks in expression of PEX11 family proteins, followed by FIS1 and DRP3A proteins that are involved in the later stages of membrane fission . The elongation step mediated by PMP30A/PEX11A appears to be prerequisite for the recruitment of dynamin-related GTPases that subsequently act in membrane scission to physically separate the dividing peroxisomes .

What evolutionary insights can be derived from studying PMP30A and its homologs across species?

Comprehensive comparative genomics surveys have revealed that the PEX11 protein (of which PMP30A is a member) is highly conserved and ancestral, having undergone numerous lineage-specific duplications throughout eukaryotic evolution . While PEX11 itself appears to be a foundational peroxisomal protein, other PEX11 family members represent fungal-specific innovations . The functional conservation between distantly related species is remarkable - PMP30A from C. boidinii can functionally complement the loss of PMP27 in S. cerevisiae, and vice versa, despite these organisms being separated by significant evolutionary distance . This conservation suggests that the mechanism of peroxisome proliferation is a fundamental cellular process that evolved early in eukaryotic history and has been maintained with relatively little functional divergence despite sequence changes.

What genetic approaches can be used to study PMP30A function?

Several genetic approaches have proven valuable for studying PMP30A function:

  • Gene disruption: Targeted disruption of the PMP30 gene in haploid strains of C. boidinii (such as strain S2) allows researchers to observe the resulting phenotype - inhibited growth on methanol and the development of fewer, larger, and more spherical peroxisomes .

  • Heterologous complementation: Expression of PMP30A in PMP27-disrupted S. cerevisiae cells, or expression of PMP27 in PMP30-disrupted C. boidinii cells, provides powerful evidence for functional homology. This approach demonstrated that complementation was successful in both directions, although reversion to a wild-type phenotype was only partial for the PMP30 disruptant .

  • Protein-protein interaction studies: Techniques such as yeast two-hybrid assays can be used to identify interaction partners. Similar studies with Arabidopsis PEX11 proteins revealed homooligomerization of PEX11 isoforms and heterooligomerizations with other proteins involved in peroxisome division, such as FIS1b .

What phenotypic assays are most informative when studying PMP30A mutants?

The most informative phenotypic assays for studying PMP30A mutants include:

  • Growth rate analysis on peroxisome-inducing substrates: Measuring growth rates on methanol, oleate, or D-alanine media provides functional data on the impact of mutations, as PMP30A-disrupted cells show significantly inhibited growth on methanol .

  • Microscopic characterization of peroxisome morphology: Analyzing peroxisome number, size, and shape using fluorescence microscopy with peroxisomal markers is critical. Wild-type cells typically have numerous small peroxisomes, while PMP30A-disrupted cells develop fewer, larger, and more spherical peroxisomes .

  • Cell synchronization studies: Synchronizing cell cultures and monitoring peroxisome dynamics throughout the cell cycle provides insights into the temporal regulation of PMP30A function. This approach has revealed that peroxisomes sequentially enlarge, elongate, and then double in number during G2 phase, correlating with peaks in PEX11 expression .

How do researchers explain the observed differences in phenotype severity when PMP30/PEX11 is disrupted in different organisms?

This discrepancy might be explained by:

  • Functional redundancy among PEX11 family members in organisms with multiple PEX11 isoforms.

  • Species-specific differences in the molecular mechanisms of peroxisome biogenesis.

  • The possibility that Y. lipolytica PEX11 retained an ancestral role in de novo peroxisome assembly that was lost in other lineages.

These differences highlight the importance of comparative studies across diverse organisms to fully understand the evolutionarily conserved and divergent aspects of peroxisome biogenesis and proliferation.

What are the technical challenges in working with recombinant PMP30A/PEX11A proteins?

Working with recombinant PMP30A/PEX11A presents several technical challenges:

  • Membrane protein expression and purification: As integral membrane proteins, PMP30A/PEX11A can be difficult to express and purify in functional form. Researchers must carefully choose expression systems and solubilization methods that preserve protein structure and function.

  • Functional assays: Since PMP30A/PEX11A functions in membrane remodeling, traditional enzymatic assays are not applicable. Instead, researchers must rely on more complex assays such as liposome tubulation assays or in vivo complementation studies.

  • Structural characterization: The membrane-embedded nature of these proteins makes them challenging subjects for structural studies using techniques like X-ray crystallography. Alternative approaches such as cryo-electron microscopy may be more suitable but present their own technical challenges.

What is known about the regulation of PMP30A/PEX11A expression and activity?

Post-translational modifications may also regulate PMP30A/PEX11A activity. For example, human PEX11A does not appear to be N-glycosylated , but other potential modifications such as phosphorylation have not been thoroughly investigated. The basic isoelectric point (above 10) of PMP30A suggests that charge interactions could play a significant role in its membrane-remodeling functions .

How do researchers differentiate between direct and indirect effects when studying PMP30A/PEX11A function?

Differentiating between direct and indirect effects of PMP30A/PEX11A is methodologically challenging. Researchers employ several approaches:

  • Temporal studies: By examining the sequence of events following PMP30A/PEX11A induction, researchers can determine which changes occur first (likely direct effects) versus those that appear later (potentially indirect effects).

  • Structure-function analyses: Creating targeted mutations that affect specific protein domains or functions helps dissect which aspects of the observed phenotype are directly linked to particular protein features.

  • In vitro reconstitution: Using purified components to reconstitute PMP30A/PEX11A function in artificial membrane systems provides strong evidence for direct effects.

  • Complementation specificity: The observation that PMP30A and PMP27 (S. cerevisiae homolog) can functionally complement each other suggests that their effects on peroxisome morphology and proliferation are direct rather than through species-specific interaction partners .

How does PMP30A compare structurally and functionally across different species?

The following table summarizes key comparative aspects of PMP30A/PEX11 across different species:

SpeciesProtein NameSize (aa)Key FeaturesPhenotype When DeletedReference
Candida boidiniiPMP30A/B256Basic protein (pI >10), 1-2 transmembrane domainsFewer, larger, more spherical peroxisomes; inhibited growth on methanol
Saccharomyces cerevisiaePMP27Similar to PMP30Functional homolog of PMP30Fewer, larger peroxisomes when grown on oleate
Arabidopsis thalianaPEX11a-e (5 isoforms)VariesThree groups based on sequence homologySilencing of PEX11c-e leads to 40% reduction in peroxisome number
Yarrowia lipolyticaPex11pNot specifiedAncestral role retainedComplete absence of peroxisomes (classical pex phenotype)
HumansPEX11A114 aa fragment characterizedNon-glycosylated, promotes membrane protrusionNot specified in search results

This comparative analysis reveals both conservation and divergence in PEX11 structure and function across evolution. The basic membrane-remodeling function appears to be conserved, but the severity of deletion phenotypes varies significantly, suggesting species-specific adaptations in peroxisome biogenesis pathways.

What are the promising future research directions for PMP30A/PEX11A?

Several promising research directions emerge from current knowledge of PMP30A/PEX11A:

  • Structural biology: Determining the three-dimensional structure of PMP30A/PEX11A would provide insights into the molecular mechanism of membrane remodeling.

  • Lipid interactions: Investigating how PMP30A/PEX11A interacts with specific membrane lipids could reveal the biophysical basis of membrane tubulation.

  • Interactome mapping: Comprehensive identification of PMP30A/PEX11A protein interaction partners across different conditions and species would illuminate its functional network.

  • Evolutionary analysis: Further comparative studies across diverse eukaryotes could clarify why some organisms show more severe phenotypes upon PEX11 deletion and reveal the ancestral functions of this protein family.

  • Synthetic biology applications: Engineered versions of PMP30A/PEX11A could potentially be used to manipulate peroxisome abundance in biotechnological applications or to address peroxisomal disorders.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.