Recombinant Candida glabrata Mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 10 (NUT2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Candida glabrata Mediator of RNA Polymerase II Transcription Subunit 10 (NUT2)

Recombinant Candida glabrata Mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 10, commonly referred to as NUT2, is a crucial component of the Mediator complex, which plays an essential role in the transcriptional regulation of RNA polymerase II-dependent genes. This subunit acts as a coactivator that facilitates the communication between gene-specific regulatory proteins and the basal transcription machinery, thereby influencing gene expression significantly.

Structure and Function of NUT2

NUT2 is part of a larger Mediator complex that is integral to the transcription process. The Mediator complex serves as a bridge, connecting transcription factors with RNA polymerase II, and is involved in the assembly of the preinitiation complex necessary for transcription initiation.

Key Functions:

  • Transcription Regulation: NUT2 is involved in regulating nearly all RNA polymerase II-dependent genes.

  • Scaffold Formation: It helps in forming a scaffold for assembling the preinitiation complex along with general transcription factors.

  • Interaction with Regulatory Proteins: NUT2 is recruited to promoters through direct interactions with various regulatory proteins, which enhances its role in gene activation.

Role in Antifungal Resistance

Recent studies have highlighted the significance of NUT2 in antifungal resistance mechanisms, particularly in Candida glabrata. The subunit is implicated in modulating resistance to azole antifungal drugs, which are commonly used to treat fungal infections.

Research Findings:

  • A study demonstrated that deletion of the MED2 gene (CgMED2), which encodes a tail subunit related to NUT2, resulted in increased susceptibility to azole antifungals due to impaired transcriptional activation of resistance-related genes such as CgPdr1 and CgCdr1 .

  • Furthermore, NUT2's interaction with other Mediator components like CgNut1 and CgSrb8 is essential for high-level fluconazole resistance conferred by hyperactive alleles of CgPdr1 .

Experimental Studies and Data Analysis

Table 1: Functional Partners of NUT2

Protein NameFunction Description
SOH1Mediator subunit involved in regulated transcription
SRB6Coactivator for RNA polymerase II transcription
SRB7Component of the Mediator complex aiding transcription
MED7Facilitates assembly of preinitiation complex
MED14Involved in conveying regulatory signals to polymerase II

This table summarizes key functional partners of NUT2 within the Mediator complex, emphasizing its collaborative role in gene regulation.

Implications for Future Research

The understanding of NUT2's role extends beyond basic biology; it has significant implications for developing new therapeutic strategies against Candida glabrata infections. Given its involvement in antifungal resistance pathways, targeting components like NUT2 could enhance treatment efficacy and overcome existing resistance mechanisms.

Future Directions:

  • Investigating the structural dynamics of NUT2 within the Mediator complex.

  • Exploring potential inhibitors that can disrupt NUT2 interactions with regulatory proteins.

  • Conducting further transcriptomic analyses during infection models to identify additional roles of NUT2.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes. We will fulfill your request whenever possible.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless otherwise requested. Dry ice shipping requires prior notification and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability.
Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.

The tag type is determined during production. If you have a specific tag requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize its inclusion.

Synonyms
NUT2; MED10; CAGL0I08525gMediator of RNA polymerase II transcription subunit 10; Mediator complex subunit 10
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-199
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Candida glabrata (strain ATCC 2001 / CBS 138 / JCM 3761 / NBRC 0622 / NRRL Y-65) (Yeast) (Torulopsis glabrata)
Target Names
NUT2
Target Protein Sequence
MGSVKSSNPA LEGLHEELGV MEEQIRSIIE SFIELGVSVY DFPGTPEASQ GMVTNLKRNV DRIFKLNQTS NDPQSALKDV NVPLEVVQYI EDGRNPDIYT REFVEAIRRS NQYQRAKMHG MGMLRDSLAE KIKEQFPELK DDVENIVQRT NMKPTGQARV NSGTTNMTTT AEQSNVVNAT AGDVGTNANT TESVEQNGI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Mediator complex component; a coactivator involved in the regulated transcription of nearly all RNA polymerase II-dependent genes. Mediator acts as a bridge, transmitting information from gene-specific regulatory proteins to the basal RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. It is recruited to promoters through direct interactions with regulatory proteins and serves as a scaffold for assembling a functional preinitiation complex with RNA polymerase II and general transcription factors.
Database Links
Protein Families
Mediator complex subunit 10 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is the structure and organization of the Mediator complex in C. glabrata?

The Mediator complex in C. glabrata follows the typical eukaryotic organization with four distinct modules: head, middle, tail, and CDK/cyclin modules. Based on research, the complex includes identified subunits such as CgMed2, CgPgd1 (CgMed3), and CgRgr1 (CgMed14) in the tail module; CgNut1 (CgMed5) in the middle module; and CgSrb8 (CgMed12) in the CDK/cyclin module . While the NUT2 subunit (Med10) is not specifically characterized in the available literature, it would likely be positioned in the middle module based on homology with other eukaryotes. The tail module preferentially regulates SAGA complex-dependent genes and relays information from gene-specific regulatory proteins through the middle and head modules to the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery .

How do I determine if my recombinant Med10/NUT2 protein is properly folded and functional?

To assess proper folding and functionality of recombinant C. glabrata Med10/NUT2:

  • Structural integrity assessment: Use circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to examine secondary structure elements, comparing the spectrum with predicted structural features based on homology models.

  • Interaction validation: Test the ability of the recombinant protein to interact with known binding partners from the middle module. Co-immunoprecipitation assays can verify these interactions, similar to how researchers have detected protein complexes like CgYhi1-CgMfa2 .

  • Complementation studies: Express your recombinant Med10/NUT2 in a Med10-deficient strain and assess rescue of phenotypes, similar to approaches used with CgMed2Δ/CgMED2 strains in low pH tolerance studies .

  • Aberrant migration monitoring: Be aware that Mediator subunits may show aberrant migration patterns on SDS-PAGE due to post-translational modifications or complex formation. Western blot analysis of your recombinant protein should account for potential discrepancies between calculated and observed molecular weights .

What roles do Mediator subunits play in C. glabrata pathogenicity?

Mediator subunits contribute significantly to C. glabrata pathogenicity through multiple mechanisms:

  • Antifungal resistance: CgMed2 is essential for both basal tolerance and acquired resistance to azole antifungals by facilitating transcriptional activation of genes encoding the zinc finger transcription factor CgPdr1 and the multidrug efflux pump CgCdr1 . Deletion of CgMed2 increases susceptibility to fluconazole and caspofungin, suggesting its pivotal role in drug resistance mechanisms .

  • Host cell interactions: CgMed2 deletion leads to elevated adherence to epithelial cells due to increased expression of EPA1 and EPA7 adhesin genes . This indicates that Mediator subunits regulate virulence factors involved in host-pathogen interactions.

  • Survival in host environments: CgMed2 is required for intracellular proliferation in human macrophages and modulates survival in a murine model of disseminated candidiasis . Additionally, the Mediator complex contributes to stress tolerance, with CgMed2 being critical for survival under low pH conditions (pH 2.0) .

  • Interspecies cooperation: While not directly linked to Med10/NUT2, C. glabrata utilizes a mating signaling pathway to express and efflux a novel protein, CgYhi1, that induces hyphal growth in C. albicans, which is essential for host tissue invasion . This represents a sophisticated strategy where C. glabrata, which cannot invade host tissue alone, benefits from interaction with C. albicans during mixed-species invasive candidiasis .

What are the recommended methods for expressing and purifying recombinant Mediator subunits from C. glabrata?

Based on successful approaches with other Mediator subunits, the following methods are recommended:

  • Expression system selection:

    • E. coli systems with codon optimization for heterologous expression

    • Yeast expression systems (S. cerevisiae or native C. glabrata) for proper eukaryotic post-translational modifications

  • Construct design:

    • Incorporate affinity tags (6xHis, GST, or MBP) for purification

    • Consider epitope tags (HA or FLAG) for detection in complex biological samples

    • For functional studies, ensure the tag doesn't interfere with protein-protein interactions

  • Purification strategy:

    • Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using the incorporated tag

    • Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography to separate charged variants

    • Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography to isolate monomeric protein or stable complexes

  • Validation methods:

    • Western blotting with specific antibodies

    • Mass spectrometry for identity confirmation

    • Circular dichroism for secondary structure assessment

    • Dynamic light scattering for homogeneity analysis

  • Special considerations:

    • Be aware of potential complex formation with other Mediator subunits

    • Account for aberrant migration on SDS-PAGE, as seen with CgYhi1-CgMfa2 complex, which migrated at ~40 kDa despite different calculated molecular weights

    • Consider native conditions to preserve functionally important interactions

What are effective approaches for studying protein-protein interactions involving Med10/NUT2?

To investigate protein-protein interactions involving Med10/NUT2 in C. glabrata:

  • Computational prediction:

    • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies using predicted 3D structures to explore potential interactions, similar to approaches used for CgMfa2 and CgYhi1

    • Homology modeling based on S. cerevisiae Med10 interactions

    • Protein-protein docking simulations to predict interaction interfaces

  • In vitro interaction assays:

    • Pull-down assays using recombinant Med10/NUT2 as bait

    • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure binding kinetics

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters of interactions

  • In vivo approaches:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with tagged Med10/NUT2 followed by mass spectrometry

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening to identify novel interaction partners

    • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to visualize interactions in living cells

    • Proximity-dependent biotin labeling (BioID/TurboID) to capture transient interactions

  • Structural characterization:

    • Crosslinking mass spectrometry to map interaction interfaces

    • Cryo-electron microscopy of purified Mediator complex to visualize Med10/NUT2 position

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify interaction surfaces

  • Functional validation:

    • Mutagenesis of predicted interaction sites followed by phenotypic analysis

    • Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis to identify functional partners

How can knockout and complementation studies be designed for investigating Med10/NUT2 function?

Based on successful approaches with other Mediator subunits, the following strategy is recommended:

  • Knockout strain generation:

    • Homologous recombination-based gene replacement using selectable markers

    • CRISPR-Cas9 system for precise gene editing

    • Alternative approach: Use transposon (Tn7) insertions as described for other Mediator subunits like CgSrb8, CgRgr1, CgNut1, and CgPgd1

  • Verification strategies:

    • PCR verification of the target locus

    • RT-qPCR to confirm absence of target transcript

    • Western blotting to verify protein absence

    • Whole genome sequencing to confirm single integration without off-target effects

  • Complementation construct design:

    • Native promoter and terminator to ensure physiological expression levels

    • Optional epitope tag for detection (C-terminal preferred to minimize functional disruption)

    • Selection marker different from the one used for knockout generation

    • Integration at the native locus or a neutral site

  • Phenotypic characterization:

    • Growth assays under various stress conditions (similar to CgMed2 studies at pH 2.0)

    • Antifungal susceptibility testing (azoles, echinocandins)

    • Virulence-related phenotypes (adherence, biofilm formation)

    • Transcriptome analysis to identify regulated genes

  • Special considerations:

    • If Med10/NUT2 deletion proves lethal, consider conditional expression systems

    • Be aware that some Mediator subunit combinations may be synthetically lethal (as seen with attempts to generate CgMED2 and CgPDR1 double deletion)

    • Include appropriate controls, including wild-type and other Mediator subunit mutants for comparison

How does the Mediator complex coordinate transcriptional responses to different stressors in C. glabrata?

The Mediator complex in C. glabrata orchestrates stress-specific transcriptional responses through several mechanisms:

  • Stress-specific transcription factor interactions:

    • Under low pH stress, the protein kinase CgYak1 activates transcription factor CgYap6, which then recruits CgMed2 to express glycerophospholipid-related genes

    • During azole stress, CgMed15 binds to CgPdr1 through its KIX domain to activate CDR gene transcription

  • Module-specific functions:

    • Tail module subunits (CgMed2, CgMed15) primarily interact with stress-specific transcription factors

    • Middle module subunits (likely including Med10/NUT2) relay signals from the tail to the head module

    • CDK/cyclin module subunits (CgSrb8) may regulate complex activity

  • Integrated stress responses:

    • Multiple Mediator subunits (CgMed2, CgNut1, CgSrb8) cooperate for high-level fluconazole resistance

    • CgMed2 contributes to both azole resistance and cell wall integrity, suggesting coordinated regulation of multiple stress responses

  • Quantitative effects on stress tolerance:

    • CgMed2 deletion resulted in decreased cell growth (26.1%) and survival (32.3%) at pH 2.0

    • Overexpression of CgMed2 increased cell growth (12.4%) and survival (5.9%) compared to wild-type

For Med10/NUT2, as a predicted middle module component, it likely serves as a critical junction in transmitting signals from stress-specific transcription factors bound to tail subunits to the core transcriptional machinery, ensuring appropriate stress responses.

What methodologies can reveal the genome-wide binding patterns of Med10/NUT2?

To investigate genome-wide binding patterns of Med10/NUT2 in C. glabrata:

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq):

    • Epitope-tag Med10/NUT2 (HA or FLAG) in the native locus

    • Optimize crosslinking conditions for protein-DNA interactions

    • Perform ChIP with tag-specific antibodies

    • Sequence recovered DNA to identify binding sites

    • Analyze for enrichment at specific promoters or genomic features

  • CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag:

    • These techniques offer higher signal-to-noise ratio than traditional ChIP

    • Particularly useful for factors with weak or transient chromatin interactions

    • Can be performed with fewer cells, which is advantageous for experiments under stress conditions

  • ChEC-seq (Chromatin Endogenous Cleavage):

    • Fuse Med10/NUT2 to MNase enzyme

    • Upon activation, MNase cleaves DNA at binding sites

    • Sequence the resulting fragments to determine binding locations

  • Comparative genomic approaches:

    • Compare binding patterns under different stress conditions

    • Overlay with transcription factor binding sites to identify co-regulatory relationships

    • Integrate with transcriptome data (RNA-seq) to correlate binding with gene expression changes

  • Data integration and validation:

    • Motif discovery to identify sequence preferences

    • Comparison with binding patterns of other Mediator subunits

    • Validation of key binding sites with directed ChIP-qPCR

    • Functional validation through reporter gene assays

This multi-faceted approach would reveal not only where Med10/NUT2 binds across the genome but also how these binding patterns change under different conditions, providing insights into its role in transcriptional regulation.

What is the relationship between Med10/NUT2 and antifungal resistance mechanisms in C. glabrata?

While specific information on Med10/NUT2's role in antifungal resistance is limited, we can formulate research approaches based on knowledge of other Mediator subunits:

  • Potential mechanisms based on homology:

    • As a middle module component, Med10/NUT2 likely facilitates communication between tail subunits (which interact with transcription factors) and the core transcriptional machinery

    • It may be essential for transmitting signals from CgPdr1-CgMed15 interactions to activate multidrug resistance genes like CgCDR1

  • Experimental approaches to investigate:

    • Generate conditional Med10/NUT2 mutants and assess azole susceptibility

    • Measure expression of known resistance genes (CgCDR1, CgPDR1) in Med10/NUT2-depleted cells

    • Perform epistasis analysis with hyperactive CgPDR1 alleles, similar to studies showing that CgMed2, CgNut1, and CgSrb8 are required for high-level fluconazole resistance

    • Use ChIP to determine if Med10/NUT2 is recruited to promoters of resistance genes

  • Integration with known resistance pathways:

    • The current model suggests that azole resistance requires coordination between multiple Mediator modules

    • Middle module subunits like Med10/NUT2 may provide structural stability for the complex during stress responses

    • Research should examine if Med10/NUT2 interacts with known resistance determinants like CgPdr1

  • Clinical relevance:

    • Sequence Med10/NUT2 in clinical isolates with varying antifungal susceptibilities

    • Determine if Med10/NUT2 mutations correlate with resistance phenotypes

    • Assess if Med10/NUT2 function is altered in strains that develop resistance during therapy

How does Med10/NUT2 contribute to C. glabrata pathogenesis in different host niches?

To investigate Med10/NUT2's contribution to C. glabrata pathogenesis:

  • Host niche-specific expression patterns:

    • Analyze Med10/NUT2 expression levels during colonization of different host environments

    • Compare transcriptional profiles of wild-type versus Med10/NUT2-depleted cells recovered from different host niches

    • Examine if Med10/NUT2 is differentially regulated under conditions mimicking specific host environments

  • Interspecies interactions:

    • Investigate if Med10/NUT2 affects C. glabrata's ability to interact with other microorganisms, similar to how C. glabrata uses the mating signaling pathway to express CgYhi1, which induces hyphal growth in C. albicans

    • Examine mixed-species biofilms with wild-type versus Med10/NUT2-depleted C. glabrata

  • Host immune interactions:

    • Assess Med10/NUT2's role in survival within macrophages, similar to studies showing CgMed2 is required for intracellular proliferation

    • Investigate effects on neutrophil responses and other immune cell interactions

    • Determine if Med10/NUT2 regulates expression of immunomodulatory factors

  • Biofilm and adherence contributions:

    • Evaluate adhesion to different host surfaces with and without Med10/NUT2

    • Examine biofilm architecture and composition

    • Investigate regulation of adhesin genes, particularly EPA family members which are affected by CgMed2

  • In vivo models:

    • Murine models of disseminated candidiasis with tissue-specific tracking

    • Gastrointestinal colonization models to assess commensalism

    • Ex vivo organ culture systems to examine tissue-specific interactions

This comprehensive approach would reveal how Med10/NUT2 contributes to C. glabrata's remarkable adaptability across diverse host environments.

What are the structural determinants of Med10/NUT2 interaction with other Mediator subunits?

Understanding the structural basis of Med10/NUT2 interactions requires:

  • Computational structural analysis:

    • Homology modeling based on solved structures of Med10 from other organisms

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to identify stable interaction interfaces

    • Evolutionary conservation analysis to identify functionally important residues

    • Similar approaches have successfully predicted interactions between CgMfa2 and CgYhi1

  • Experimental mapping techniques:

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify protected regions upon complex formation

    • Crosslinking mass spectrometry to map proximity between specific residues

    • Deletion and point mutation analysis to identify critical interaction domains

    • Co-crystallization or cryo-EM studies of Med10/NUT2 with interacting subunits

  • Functional validation approaches:

    • Mutate predicted interface residues and assess effects on:

      • Complex assembly (co-immunoprecipitation)

      • Transcriptional activation (reporter assays)

      • Stress tolerance and antifungal resistance

    • Compensatory mutation analysis to confirm specific interactions

  • Comparison with other fungal species:

    • Comparative analysis with S. cerevisiae Med10 interactions

    • Identification of C. glabrata-specific interaction features

    • Assessment of conservation across pathogenic Candida species

  • Integration with whole-complex architecture:

    • Position Med10/NUT2 interactions within the context of the entire Mediator complex

    • Identify potential allosteric effects of Med10/NUT2 interactions on distant regions of the complex

    • Map conformational changes induced by transcription factor binding that might affect Med10/NUT2 interactions

This integrated structural biology approach would reveal how Med10/NUT2 contributes to the architecture and function of the Mediator complex in C. glabrata.

Can Med10/NUT2 be targeted for development of novel antifungal therapies?

Med10/NUT2 presents several possible advantages as a therapeutic target:

  • Target validation considerations:

    • If Med10/NUT2 proves essential for viability, it may serve as a direct antifungal target

    • If non-essential but required for virulence or drug resistance (similar to CgMed2), it could be targeted to enhance existing therapies or reduce pathogenicity

    • Evaluation should include both deletion studies and point mutation analysis to identify critical functions

  • Druggability assessment:

    • Structural analysis to identify potential binding pockets

    • Virtual screening against predicted structure

    • Fragment-based approaches to identify starting molecules

    • Peptide mimetics of natural interaction partners

  • Therapeutic strategies:

    • Direct inhibition of Med10/NUT2 function

    • Disruption of specific protein-protein interactions, particularly those unique to fungi

    • Destabilization of the Mediator complex through allosteric effects

    • Combination therapy with existing antifungals, similar to how CgMed2, CgNut1, and CgSrb8 are required for high-level fluconazole resistance

  • Selectivity considerations:

    • Comparative analysis with human Med10 to identify fungal-specific features

    • Focus on interaction surfaces unique to fungi

    • Assess potential off-target effects on human Mediator function

  • Delivery strategies:

    • Consider bioavailability issues for targeting an intracellular protein

    • Evaluate potential for developing peptide-based inhibitors

    • Assess possibility of RNA interference approaches if direct targeting proves challenging

While challenging, targeting components of fundamental transcriptional machinery offers potential for broad-spectrum activity against difficult-to-treat fungal infections.

What technological advances are needed to better understand Med10/NUT2 function in C. glabrata?

Several technological advances would significantly enhance our understanding of Med10/NUT2:

  • Improved structural biology techniques:

    • Higher resolution cryo-EM to visualize the entire C. glabrata Mediator complex

    • In situ structural determination methods to study the complex in its native nuclear environment

    • Time-resolved structural methods to capture dynamic conformational changes during transcription

  • Advanced genetic manipulation tools:

    • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for conditional depletion if Med10/NUT2 proves essential

    • Genome-wide genetic interaction mapping (synthetic genetic array) optimized for C. glabrata

    • More efficient homologous recombination systems for generating targeted mutations

  • Single-cell technologies:

    • Single-cell RNA-seq to capture transcriptional heterogeneity in response to Med10/NUT2 perturbation

    • Single-molecule tracking to visualize Med10/NUT2 dynamics during transcription

    • Multiplexed imaging approaches to simultaneously track multiple Mediator subunits

  • In vivo and ex vivo systems:

    • Improved animal models that better recapitulate human C. glabrata infections

    • Ex vivo organ culture systems to study host-pathogen interactions

    • Humanized immune system models to study host-specific virulence mechanisms

  • Computational approaches:

    • Enhanced molecular dynamics simulations for larger protein complexes

    • Improved homology modeling for fungal-specific proteins

    • Machine learning approaches to predict functional consequences of mutations

The integration of these technologies would provide unprecedented insights into Med10/NUT2 function and its role in C. glabrata pathogenesis and antifungal resistance.

How does the evolutionary conservation of Med10/NUT2 inform our understanding of fungal transcriptional regulation?

Evolutionary analysis of Med10/NUT2 offers valuable insights:

  • Phylogenetic comparisons across fungal species:

    • Identify conserved regions likely essential for core functions

    • Detect lineage-specific adaptations that might relate to pathogenicity

    • Compare with distantly related fungi like basidiomycetes (Cryptococcus neoformans, Ustilago maydis) where the mating MAPK signaling pathway is critical for forming infectious structures

  • Functional implications of conservation:

    • Design experiments to test if conserved regions perform similar functions across species

    • Investigate if species-specific variations explain differences in transcriptional regulation

    • Determine if Med10/NUT2 conservation correlates with conservation of interacting partners

  • Structural conservation analysis:

    • Compare predicted structures across species to identify conserved interaction surfaces

    • Evaluate if structural features correlate with functional specialization

    • Assess conservation of post-translational modification sites

  • Horizontal gene transfer assessment:

    • Investigate potential instances of horizontal gene transfer of Mediator components

    • Examine if such events correlate with acquisition of new transcriptional programs

    • Consider implications for antifungal resistance emergence

  • Research applications:

    • Use conservation data to design broad-spectrum antifungal approaches

    • Leverage species-specific variations to develop selective inhibitors

    • Create chimeric proteins to test functional hypotheses about domain specialization

This evolutionary perspective not only enhances our understanding of Med10/NUT2 but also provides insights into the broader adaptation of transcriptional regulation during fungal evolution and specialization to different environmental niches.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.