Recombinant Candida glabrata Mitochondrial Import Inner Membrane Translocase Subunit TIM22 (TIM22) is a protein involved in the mitochondrial protein import machinery. It is part of the TIM22 complex, which plays a crucial role in inserting polytopic membrane proteins into the mitochondrial inner membrane. This complex is essential for maintaining mitochondrial function and integrity across various organisms, including fungi like Candida glabrata.
The TIM22 complex is responsible for the insertion of membrane proteins into the mitochondrial inner membrane. It works in conjunction with small Tim proteins, such as Tim9-Tim10 and Tim8-Tim13 complexes, which act as chaperones to guide hydrophobic membrane proteins to the insertion complex . TIM22 itself forms the central channel through which these proteins are inserted into the membrane .
In yeast, TIM22 forms an intramolecular disulfide bond, which is crucial for its stability and function. This disulfide bond helps maintain interactions with other components of the TIM22 complex, such as Tim18, especially under stress conditions like elevated temperatures . The absence of this disulfide bond can lead to destabilization of the TIM22 complex and impair the assembly of substrate proteins into the inner membrane.
Recombinant TIM22 proteins are engineered versions of the native protein, often produced in a laboratory setting for research purposes. These proteins can be tagged with markers like His-tags to facilitate purification and identification. The recombinant Candida glabrata TIM22 protein is used to study mitochondrial protein import mechanisms and the role of TIM22 in fungal mitochondria .
Research on TIM22 has provided insights into its role in maintaining mitochondrial membrane functions. In plants like Arabidopsis, the TIM22 complex is essential for seed development, indicating its broader biological significance across different kingdoms of life . Studies on recombinant TIM22 proteins can help elucidate the mechanisms of mitochondrial protein import and may contribute to understanding diseases related to mitochondrial dysfunction.
Recombinant Candida glabrata Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM22 (TIM22) is an essential core component of the TIM22 complex. This complex mediates the import and insertion of multi-pass transmembrane proteins into the mitochondrial inner membrane. Within the TIM22 complex, TIM22 forms a voltage-activated and signal-gated channel. It functions as a twin-pore translocase, utilizing the membrane potential as an external driving force in two voltage-dependent steps.
KEGG: cgr:CAGL0G05654g
STRING: 284593.XP_446607.1
TIM22 in C. glabrata functions as the core channel-forming component of the mitochondrial inner membrane translocase complex. Similar to other fungal species, it likely contains four transmembrane domains that form a hydrophobic lateral cave exposed to the lipid bilayer . The TIM22 complex mediates the insertion of multipass transmembrane proteins, particularly members of the SLC25A family of metabolite carrier proteins, into the mitochondrial inner membrane .
The TIM22 complex in most fungal species has an apparent molecular weight of approximately 300-440 kDa when assessed by blue native PAGE . Structurally, TIM22 is expected to have four hydrophobic transmembrane segments with conserved cysteine residues that form a disulfide bond critical for protein stability and function .
While specific data on C. glabrata TIM22 is limited in the provided search results, we can infer similarities based on conservation patterns. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TIM22 complex consists of four membrane-integrated subunits (Tim22, Tim54, Tim18, and Sdh3) and a peripheral chaperone complex of small TIM proteins (Tim9-Tim10-Tim12) .
It's worth noting that metazoan TIM22 complexes contain additional subunits not found in yeast, such as Tim29 , highlighting evolutionary divergence in this machinery.
Based on successful approaches with TIM22 from other organisms, the following methodology is recommended:
Expression system selection:
Purification strategy:
Quality control:
Mass spectrometry confirmation of protein identity
Circular dichroism or thermal shift assays to verify proper folding
Size exclusion chromatography to assess oligomeric state
Based on recent advances in structural biology of membrane proteins:
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Crosslinking mass spectrometry:
Useful for mapping protein-protein interactions within the complex
Can identify intersubunit contacts that stabilize the complex
Functional reconstitution:
| Technique | Resolution Range | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryo-EM | 3-4 Å | No crystallization required; captures native state | Requires highly pure, homogeneous samples |
| X-ray crystallography | 1.5-3 Å | Atomic resolution possible | Difficult crystallization of membrane proteins |
| NMR spectroscopy | Variable | Dynamic information | Size limitations |
| Crosslinking MS | N/A | Maps protein interactions | Indirect structural information |
Reconstitution experiments have demonstrated that TIM22 forms a hydrophilic, high-conductance channel with distinct opening states and pore diameters . To assess channel activity:
Liposome reconstitution:
Purified TIM22 protein can be incorporated into liposomes of defined lipid composition
The protein-to-lipid ratio should be optimized to ensure proper insertion
Electrophysiological measurements:
Substrate protein interaction assays:
Fluorescently labeled substrate proteins can be used to measure binding affinity
Changes in channel conductance upon substrate addition can indicate functional interactions
Based on studies in other yeast species, the conserved cysteine residues in TIM22 form an intramolecular disulfide bond that is critical for protein stability and function . Specifically:
Structural stability:
Functional implications:
Mutations of these cysteine residues (Cys→Ser) result in destabilization of the TIM22 complex
The destabilized complex shows reduced efficiency in assembly of polytopic inner membrane proteins, especially when handling excess substrate proteins
Growth defects become apparent in yeast cells with Cys→Ser mutations when carrier proteins are overexpressed
A disulfide bond between Cys69 and Cys141 has been identified in structural studies, which appears to stabilize transmembrane helices . These cysteines are likely conserved in C. glabrata TIM22 as well.
Candida glabrata has emerged as a significant pathogen with innate resistance to azole antifungal agents . While direct evidence linking TIM22 to pathogenicity is not established in the provided search results, several potential connections can be hypothesized:
Metabolic adaptation:
Stress response:
Mitochondrial function is implicated in cellular stress responses
Proper protein import via TIM22 may be critical for responding to host immune defenses or antifungal drugs
Drug resistance mechanisms:
Altered mitochondrial function has been linked to antifungal resistance in some fungi
TIM22-dependent protein import might influence the expression or localization of drug efflux pumps or other resistance factors
Given the essential nature of TIM22 in mitochondrial biogenesis, it represents a potential target for novel antifungal development:
Target validation considerations:
Selectivity potential:
Experimental approaches:
High-throughput screening of compound libraries against recombinant C. glabrata TIM22
Structure-based drug design targeting unique features of the fungal protein
In vitro reconstitution assays to identify compounds that disrupt channel activity
Based on the available information about yeast and human TIM22 complexes:
Compositional differences:
Structural variations:
Functional implications:
These differences suggest divergent mechanisms of substrate recognition and membrane insertion
They may offer opportunities for selective targeting of fungal TIM22 for therapeutic purposes
| Feature | Yeast TIM22 | Human TIM22 | Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex size | ~300 kDa | ~440 kDa | Different subunit composition |
| Specific subunits | Tim22, Tim54, Tim18, Sdh3 | Tim22, Tim29, AGK | Different regulatory mechanisms |
| TOM complex interaction | Not documented | Via Tim29 | Different substrate transfer mechanisms |
| Channel architecture | Likely multiple Tim22 subunits | Single Tim22 subunit | Different insertion mechanisms |
When conducting comparative studies between C. glabrata TIM22 and its homologs in other yeast species:
Expression level normalization:
Ensure comparable expression levels of TIM22 across different species
Western blotting with antibodies against conserved epitopes or tagged constructs
Substrate selection:
Growth condition standardization:
Culture all yeast strains under identical conditions
Test multiple conditions, including stress conditions that might reveal functional differences
Genetic complementation assays:
Test whether C. glabrata TIM22 can complement S. cerevisiae TIM22 deletion
Analyze growth rates and mitochondrial protein import efficiency in complemented strains
The disulfide bond between conserved cysteine residues in TIM22 plays a crucial role in protein stability and function . Advanced research questions include:
Conformational changes during import:
The disulfide bond may restrict conformational flexibility of Tim22
Molecular dynamics simulations could reveal how this constraint affects channel gating
Redox regulation:
The redox state of the mitochondrial intermembrane space might regulate TIM22 activity
Investigation of whether transient reduction/oxidation of the disulfide bond occurs during the import cycle
Experimental approaches:
Site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to track conformational changes
Single-molecule FRET to monitor distance changes between domains during substrate binding
Recent studies have implicated the TIM22 complex in regulating mitochondrial one-carbon metabolism , which could have significant implications for C. glabrata physiology:
Metabolic dependencies:
Potential research directions:
Metabolomic profiling of wild-type versus TIM22-depleted C. glabrata
Analysis of how alterations in one-carbon metabolism affect virulence and drug resistance
Comparison with metabolic adaptations in other pathogenic Candida species
Experimental approaches:
CRISPR-based manipulation of TIM22 expression levels
Proteomics analysis of mitochondrial carrier protein abundance
13C-labeled substrate tracing to monitor metabolic flux
Membrane protein expression and purification present numerous challenges:
Expression systems:
Toxicity when overexpressed in heterologous systems
Improper folding or aggregation
Solution: Test multiple expression systems (E. coli, yeast, insect cells) and optimize induction conditions
Solubilization and stability:
Finding appropriate detergents for extraction from membranes
Maintaining stability during purification
Solution: Screen detergent panels and consider addition of lipids or stabilizing agents
Quality assessment:
Verifying proper folding and oligomeric state
Solution: Combine size exclusion chromatography, BN-PAGE, and thermal shift assays
Functional verification:
Confirming that purified protein forms channels
Solution: Liposome reconstitution and electrophysiology measurements
Studying interactions within membrane protein complexes presents unique challenges:
Co-immunoprecipitation strategies:
Use epitope tags at positions that don't disrupt complex formation
Carefully optimize detergent conditions to maintain interactions
Cross-validation with multiple tag positions and reciprocal pull-downs
Crosslinking approaches:
Chemical crosslinking combined with mass spectrometry can map interaction interfaces
In vivo photo-crosslinking with genetically encoded crosslinkers provides spatial precision
Genetic interaction mapping:
Synthetic genetic array analysis to identify functional relationships
Suppressor screening to identify compensatory mutations
Split reporter assays:
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation to visualize interactions in living cells
Split luciferase assays for quantitative interaction assessment
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Best Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-IP | Captures native complexes | Detergent sensitivity | Stable interactions |
| Crosslinking-MS | Identifies interaction sites | Complex data analysis | Transient interactions |
| Genetic screens | In vivo relevance | Indirect evidence | Functional relationships |
| Split reporters | Live cell visualization | Potential artifacts | Dynamic interactions |