Recombinant Candida glabrata Nonsense-mediated decay protein 4 (NMD4)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a reference for your convenience.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
NMD4; CAGL0G05005g; Nonsense-mediated decay protein 4
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-244
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Candida glabrata (strain ATCC 2001 / CBS 138 / JCM 3761 / NBRC 0622 / NRRL Y-65) (Yeast) (Torulopsis glabrata)
Target Names
NMD4
Target Protein Sequence
MNQYNFILDA SAFEKGLGNV KRWCQSNGNV DGKKNVYLRF YVPTFTLQEL NFLQYRHKSF SAKEALKFID KLETATSEGQ RNHVVIGRKK EEDLRSDLEL FIEFPDILDA VTWPTVLSYC TEGQATIDSL NKLPKRFKIL LKSCVYKCHL EDDDRIRWIL VTEDPQVRKI ASQCHIPWCS IVDADSIISK DMNDRSFRDS EKFNSMMLKR GVAKSENMDG KEVIKTNFDQ TVYATRGSGK LWTP
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Involved in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) of transcripts containing premature termination codons.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is the function of NMD4 in Candida glabrata's nonsense-mediated decay pathway?

NMD4 likely functions as part of the conserved eukaryotic nonsense-mediated mRNA decay surveillance mechanism in C. glabrata. Based on established NMD mechanisms, NMD4 would participate in recognizing mRNAs containing premature termination codons (PTCs) and triggering their accelerated degradation . This prevents the synthesis of potentially toxic truncated proteins and contributes to maintaining gene expression quality.

The methodology to investigate this function would involve:

  • Creating NMD4 deletion mutants in C. glabrata

  • Measuring stability of known NMD target transcripts in wildtype versus mutant strains

  • Performing RNA-seq analysis to identify transcripts whose abundance increases in NMD4-deficient cells

  • Using reporter constructs containing engineered PTCs to assess NMD efficiency

How does C. glabrata NMD4 function compare to its homologs in other fungi?

While specific data on C. glabrata NMD4 is limited in the provided search results, comparative analysis would be based on evolutionary conservation patterns. Like other fungal pathogens, C. glabrata likely maintains core NMD functions while potentially evolving specialized adaptations related to its pathogenic lifestyle.

Research approaches should include:

  • Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of NMD4 across fungal species

  • Complementation studies expressing NMD4 from different species in C. glabrata NMD4 knockouts

  • Comparative analysis of NMD substrate specificity across species

  • Evaluation of protein interaction networks through tandem-affinity purification and mass spectrometry approaches similar to those used for other C. glabrata proteins

What techniques are most effective for detecting NMD4 expression in C. glabrata?

Methodology recommendations include:

  • Quantitative RT-PCR with primers specifically designed for C. glabrata NMD4

  • Western blotting using custom antibodies against C. glabrata NMD4

  • Epitope tagging of the endogenous NMD4 gene for detection with commercial antibodies

  • GFP-fusion constructs for visualization of subcellular localization and expression dynamics

  • RNA-seq analysis for transcriptome-wide expression measurement

For dynamic studies, researchers should consider:

  • Time-course experiments during host-pathogen interactions

  • Expression analysis under stress conditions relevant to pathogenesis

  • Comparison of expression in drug-resistant versus susceptible isolates

How can I design CRISPR-Cas9 experiments to study NMD4 function in C. glabrata?

CRISPR-Cas9 approaches for C. glabrata NMD4 should consider the following protocol elements:

Guide RNA Selection:

  • Design multiple sgRNAs targeting conserved functional domains

  • Verify specificity using C. glabrata genome database

  • Test efficiency in vitro before cellular application

Delivery Method:

  • Lithium acetate transformation with repair templates for targeted modifications

  • Use of selectable markers appropriate for C. glabrata

  • Sequential modification strategy for multiple edits

Verification Strategy:

  • PCR amplification and sequencing of modified loci

  • Western blot confirmation of protein deletion/modification

  • Phenotypic validation through growth curves and stress response assays

  • RNA-seq to identify transcriptome changes

Controls:

  • Include wildtype strains subjected to the same transformation protocol

  • Create reversion strains to confirm phenotype specificity

  • Generate catalytically inactive mutants to distinguish scaffold versus enzymatic functions

What experimental approaches can identify the NMD4 interactome in C. glabrata?

The interactome analysis should employ multiple complementary approaches:

Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:

  • Tandem affinity purification (TAP) followed by mass spectrometry, similar to approaches used for histone H4 interactome studies in C. glabrata

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening using NMD4 as bait

  • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) to capture transient interactions

  • Co-immunoprecipitation with epitope-tagged NMD4

RNA-Protein Interaction Analysis:

  • CLIP-seq (UV crosslinking immunoprecipitation with sequencing)

  • RIP-seq (RNA immunoprecipitation with sequencing)

  • RNA Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)

Data Analysis Pipeline:

  • Filtering against common contaminants

  • Enrichment analysis relative to control purifications

  • Network analysis to identify interaction clusters

  • Cross-reference with known NMD pathway components

How does DNA damage response in C. glabrata interact with NMD4 function?

Given that DNA damage response mechanisms are important in C. glabrata's ability to survive stressors like methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) , investigation of potential connections with NMD4 would involve:

Expression Analysis:

  • qRT-PCR and western blotting to measure NMD4 levels after DNA damage induction

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify transcription factors regulating NMD4

Genetic Interaction Studies:

  • Double mutant analysis combining NMD4 deletion with mutations in key DNA repair genes

  • Epistasis analysis to determine pathway relationships

  • Synthetic genetic array screening to identify genetic interactions

Functional Assays:

  • Survival rates under DNA damaging conditions (MMS, UV, etc.)

  • Homologous recombination frequency measurement

  • Determination of mutation rates in NMD4 mutants

Molecular Mechanism Investigation:

  • Analysis of histone levels in NMD4 mutants, given that histone H4 dosage modulates DNA damage response in C. glabrata

  • Assessment of NMD4's role in regulating transcripts encoding DNA repair proteins

What role does NMD4 play in C. glabrata virulence and host adaptation?

Investigation methodologies should include:

In vitro Virulence Assays:

  • Macrophage survival assays (particularly relevant as C. glabrata can replicate in macrophages )

  • Adhesion to epithelial cells

  • Biofilm formation capacity

  • Stress resistance profiles (oxidative, pH, thermal)

In vivo Models:

  • Mouse systemic infection models

  • Tissue burden assessment in wildtype versus NMD4 mutant infections

  • Histopathological examination of infected tissues

  • Immune response characterization

Molecular Analysis:

  • Transcriptome comparison of wildtype and NMD4 mutants during host interaction

  • Identification of virulence-associated transcripts subject to NMD regulation

  • Analysis of whether NMD4, like histone H4, influences virulence gene expression

Host Response Studies:

  • Cytokine profiling during infection with wildtype versus NMD4 mutants

  • Analysis of phagolysosome maturation in infected macrophages

  • Host cell death pathway activation comparison

How does NMD4 contribute to stress adaptation in clinical settings?

Research approaches should include:

Clinical Isolate Analysis:

  • Sequencing NMD4 from diverse clinical isolates to identify polymorphisms

  • Expression analysis in isolates from different infection sites

  • Correlation of NMD4 sequence variants with virulence or drug resistance phenotypes

Stress Response Characterization:

  • Growth curves under clinically relevant stressors

  • Transcriptome and proteome analysis during stress adaptation

  • Time-course studies to determine immediate versus adaptive responses

Host Niche Adaptation:

  • Survival in artificial urine, blood, or cerebrospinal fluid models

  • Competition assays between wildtype and NMD4 mutants in mixed infections

  • Analysis of metabolic adaptation in different host environments

How does NMD4 function impact antifungal drug resistance mechanisms?

Investigation should focus on:

Susceptibility Testing:

  • Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination for major antifungal classes

  • Time-kill kinetics to assess rate of fungicidal activity

  • Post-antifungal effect measurement

  • Biofilm susceptibility testing

Resistance Mechanism Analysis:

  • Assessment of efflux pump expression and activity in NMD4 mutants

  • Ergosterol biosynthesis pathway analysis

  • Cell wall composition and integrity testing

  • Target enzyme expression level measurement

Evolution Studies:

  • Laboratory evolution of resistance under drug pressure

  • Comparison of resistance acquisition rates

  • Whole genome sequencing to identify compensatory mutations

  • Fitness cost analysis of resistance mutations

What expression systems optimize yield and activity of recombinant C. glabrata NMD4?

Expression System Comparison:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsOptimization Strategies
E. coliHigh yield, simple cultivationPossible folding issues with eukaryotic proteinsCodon optimization, fusion tags, lowered induction temperature
S. cerevisiaeSimilar cellular context to native proteinLower yield than bacterial systemsStrong inducible promoters, protease-deficient strains
Pichia pastorisHigh-density cultivation, strong promotionLonger development timeMethanol induction optimization, multi-copy integrants
Baculovirus-insect cellEukaryotic processing, high expressionComplex system, higher costOptimized viral titers, cell line selection
Mammalian cellsMost authentic post-translational modificationsHighest cost, lowest yieldStable cell line development, optimized media

Construct Design Considerations:

  • Inclusion of purification tags (His, GST, FLAG)

  • Protease cleavage sites for tag removal

  • Domain-based expression for difficult-to-express proteins

  • Solubility-enhancing fusion partners

Expression Optimization Parameters:

  • Temperature and induction timing

  • Media composition and supplements

  • Cell density at induction

  • Harvest timing to maximize yield

What are effective purification strategies for maintaining NMD4 activity?

Purification Protocol Development:

  • Initial capture via affinity chromatography matching chosen tag

  • Intermediate purification using ion exchange chromatography

  • Polishing step via size exclusion chromatography

  • Activity assays at each purification step to track functional recovery

Buffer Optimization:

  • Systematic screening of pH and ionic strength

  • Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents)

  • Testing protease inhibitor requirements

  • Assessment of metal ion requirements or inhibition

Protein Quality Assessment:

  • Circular dichroism spectroscopy for secondary structure verification

  • Dynamic light scattering for aggregation analysis

  • Thermal shift assays for stability assessment

  • Limited proteolysis to identify stable domains

How can I develop functional assays for recombinant C. glabrata NMD4?

Biochemical Activity Assays:

  • ATPase activity measurement if NMD4 possesses this function

  • RNA binding assays using fluorescence anisotropy

  • Protein-protein interaction assays via surface plasmon resonance

  • In vitro reconstitution of minimal NMD complexes

Cell-Based Functional Assays:

  • Complementation of NMD4 knockout in C. glabrata

  • Reporter systems with PTC-containing transcripts

  • Transcriptome analysis after NMD4 re-expression

  • Stress recovery assays in complemented strains

Structure-Function Analysis:

  • Identification of critical residues through site-directed mutagenesis

  • Domain truncation studies to map functional regions

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics

How has the NMD4 gene evolved across pathogenic Candida species?

Analytical approaches should include:

Sequence Analysis:

  • Multiple sequence alignment of NMD4 orthologs

  • Calculation of evolutionary rates (dN/dS) across different domains

  • Identification of species-specific insertions or deletions

  • Analysis of selective pressure on different functional domains

Structural Bioinformatics:

  • Homology modeling based on related structures

  • Conservation mapping onto predicted structures

  • Identification of species-specific surface features

  • Protein-protein interaction interface prediction

Functional Divergence:

  • Cross-species complementation experiments

  • Domain-swapping between orthologs to identify species-specific functions

  • Correlation of sequence features with ecological niches

  • Analysis of co-evolution with other NMD pathway components

Regulatory Evolution:

  • Promoter comparison across species

  • Analysis of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms

  • Identification of species-specific alternative splicing

What insights can comparative analysis of NMD pathway architecture provide across fungal pathogens?

Research strategies should involve:

Pathway Component Identification:

  • Genome mining for all known NMD factors across species

  • Assessment of component conservation and loss events

  • Identification of lineage-specific additions to the pathway

  • Detection of gene duplication and diversification

Interaction Network Comparison:

  • Interactome determination in multiple species

  • Cross-species analysis of protein complex composition

  • Identification of conserved versus species-specific interactions

  • Correlation of network architecture with pathway efficiency

Substrate Specificity Analysis:

  • Transcriptome-wide identification of NMD targets in multiple species

  • Comparison of PTC recognition mechanisms

  • Analysis of species-specific regulatory targets

  • Correlation with virulence-associated transcripts

How can NMD pathway differences between humans and C. glabrata inform therapeutic strategies?

Research approaches should focus on:

Comparative Mechanism Analysis:

  • Detailed comparison of PTC recognition mechanisms

  • Analysis of protein-protein interaction interfaces

  • Substrate specificity differences

  • Regulatory pathway differences

Structural Divergence:

  • Identification of fungi-specific binding pockets or domains

  • Analysis of surface electrostatic properties

  • Ligand binding site comparison

  • Conformational dynamics differences

Target Validation:

  • Essentiality assessment through gene deletion

  • Phenotypic consequences of NMD inhibition

  • Effects on virulence and stress adaptation

  • Potential for resistance development

Therapeutic Development Strategy:

  • Structure-based design targeting fungi-specific features

  • High-throughput screening against recombinant fungal proteins

  • Repurposing screens of approved drugs

  • Validation in cellular and infection models

How does NMD4 integrate into C. glabrata's RNA quality control network?

Investigation methodologies should include:

Global Interaction Mapping:

  • Synthetic genetic array analysis with other RNA processing factors

  • Protein-protein interaction screening with RNA decay machineries

  • Transcriptome-wide analysis of RNA processing defects in NMD4 mutants

  • Ribosome profiling to assess translation effects

Pathway Integration Analysis:

  • Double mutant phenotyping with other quality control pathways

  • Analysis of functional overlap with no-go decay and non-stop decay

  • Investigation of connections with stress granule and P-body components

  • Assessment of links to homologous recombination pathways, which are known to be affected by histone levels in C. glabrata

Regulatory Network Construction:

  • Identification of transcription factors controlling NMD components

  • Analysis of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms

  • Assessment of feedback loops within the system

  • Computational modeling of network dynamics

What transcriptomic changes occur in C. glabrata NMD4 deletion mutants under different conditions?

Experimental design should involve:

Comprehensive RNA-seq Analysis:

  • Comparison of wildtype versus NMD4 deletion under standard conditions

  • Transcriptome profiling under host-relevant stresses

  • Time-course analysis during stress adaptation

  • Single-cell RNA-seq for population heterogeneity assessment

Data Analysis Strategy:

  • Differential expression analysis with appropriate statistical controls

  • Pathway enrichment analysis of affected transcripts

  • Alternative splicing and 3' UTR analysis

  • Integration with proteomics data for comprehensive understanding

NMD Target Classification:

  • Identification of direct versus indirect effects through decay rate measurement

  • Classification of targets by NMD-triggering features

  • Correlation with functional categories

  • Assessment of condition-specific regulation

Validation Studies:

  • qRT-PCR confirmation of key targets

  • Reporter construct analysis for selected transcripts

  • Measurement of mRNA half-lives for candidate targets

  • Functional characterization of regulated pathways

How does NMD4 function respond to environmental signals relevant to pathogenesis?

Research approaches should include:

Environmental Response Profiling:

  • NMD4 expression and localization under various stresses

  • Activity assays under different conditions

  • Post-translational modification analysis

  • Protein-protein interaction dynamics during stress

Signaling Pathway Integration:

  • Analysis of kinase-dependent regulation

  • Investigation of connections to known stress response pathways

  • Assessment of phosphorylation-dependent activity changes

  • Identification of upstream regulators

Host-Pathogen Interface Studies:

  • NMD4 activity during macrophage interaction

  • Response to host-derived stressors

  • Regulation during biofilm formation

  • Adaptation during different infection stages

Temporal Dynamics:

  • Real-time analysis of NMD4 activity using reporter systems

  • Population-level versus single-cell responses

  • Memory effects after repeated stress exposure

  • Correlation with pathogen survival and proliferation rates

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.