KEGG: cgr:CAGL0G05005g
STRING: 284593.XP_446578.1
NMD4 likely functions as part of the conserved eukaryotic nonsense-mediated mRNA decay surveillance mechanism in C. glabrata. Based on established NMD mechanisms, NMD4 would participate in recognizing mRNAs containing premature termination codons (PTCs) and triggering their accelerated degradation . This prevents the synthesis of potentially toxic truncated proteins and contributes to maintaining gene expression quality.
The methodology to investigate this function would involve:
Creating NMD4 deletion mutants in C. glabrata
Measuring stability of known NMD target transcripts in wildtype versus mutant strains
Performing RNA-seq analysis to identify transcripts whose abundance increases in NMD4-deficient cells
Using reporter constructs containing engineered PTCs to assess NMD efficiency
While specific data on C. glabrata NMD4 is limited in the provided search results, comparative analysis would be based on evolutionary conservation patterns. Like other fungal pathogens, C. glabrata likely maintains core NMD functions while potentially evolving specialized adaptations related to its pathogenic lifestyle.
Research approaches should include:
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of NMD4 across fungal species
Complementation studies expressing NMD4 from different species in C. glabrata NMD4 knockouts
Comparative analysis of NMD substrate specificity across species
Evaluation of protein interaction networks through tandem-affinity purification and mass spectrometry approaches similar to those used for other C. glabrata proteins
Methodology recommendations include:
Quantitative RT-PCR with primers specifically designed for C. glabrata NMD4
Western blotting using custom antibodies against C. glabrata NMD4
Epitope tagging of the endogenous NMD4 gene for detection with commercial antibodies
GFP-fusion constructs for visualization of subcellular localization and expression dynamics
RNA-seq analysis for transcriptome-wide expression measurement
For dynamic studies, researchers should consider:
Time-course experiments during host-pathogen interactions
Expression analysis under stress conditions relevant to pathogenesis
Comparison of expression in drug-resistant versus susceptible isolates
CRISPR-Cas9 approaches for C. glabrata NMD4 should consider the following protocol elements:
Guide RNA Selection:
Design multiple sgRNAs targeting conserved functional domains
Verify specificity using C. glabrata genome database
Test efficiency in vitro before cellular application
Delivery Method:
Lithium acetate transformation with repair templates for targeted modifications
Use of selectable markers appropriate for C. glabrata
Sequential modification strategy for multiple edits
Verification Strategy:
PCR amplification and sequencing of modified loci
Western blot confirmation of protein deletion/modification
Phenotypic validation through growth curves and stress response assays
RNA-seq to identify transcriptome changes
Controls:
Include wildtype strains subjected to the same transformation protocol
Create reversion strains to confirm phenotype specificity
Generate catalytically inactive mutants to distinguish scaffold versus enzymatic functions
The interactome analysis should employ multiple complementary approaches:
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Tandem affinity purification (TAP) followed by mass spectrometry, similar to approaches used for histone H4 interactome studies in C. glabrata
Yeast two-hybrid screening using NMD4 as bait
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) to capture transient interactions
Co-immunoprecipitation with epitope-tagged NMD4
RNA-Protein Interaction Analysis:
CLIP-seq (UV crosslinking immunoprecipitation with sequencing)
RIP-seq (RNA immunoprecipitation with sequencing)
RNA Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)
Data Analysis Pipeline:
Filtering against common contaminants
Enrichment analysis relative to control purifications
Network analysis to identify interaction clusters
Cross-reference with known NMD pathway components
Given that DNA damage response mechanisms are important in C. glabrata's ability to survive stressors like methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) , investigation of potential connections with NMD4 would involve:
Expression Analysis:
qRT-PCR and western blotting to measure NMD4 levels after DNA damage induction
Chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify transcription factors regulating NMD4
Genetic Interaction Studies:
Double mutant analysis combining NMD4 deletion with mutations in key DNA repair genes
Epistasis analysis to determine pathway relationships
Synthetic genetic array screening to identify genetic interactions
Functional Assays:
Survival rates under DNA damaging conditions (MMS, UV, etc.)
Homologous recombination frequency measurement
Determination of mutation rates in NMD4 mutants
Molecular Mechanism Investigation:
Analysis of histone levels in NMD4 mutants, given that histone H4 dosage modulates DNA damage response in C. glabrata
Assessment of NMD4's role in regulating transcripts encoding DNA repair proteins
Investigation methodologies should include:
In vitro Virulence Assays:
Macrophage survival assays (particularly relevant as C. glabrata can replicate in macrophages )
Adhesion to epithelial cells
Biofilm formation capacity
Stress resistance profiles (oxidative, pH, thermal)
In vivo Models:
Mouse systemic infection models
Tissue burden assessment in wildtype versus NMD4 mutant infections
Histopathological examination of infected tissues
Immune response characterization
Molecular Analysis:
Transcriptome comparison of wildtype and NMD4 mutants during host interaction
Identification of virulence-associated transcripts subject to NMD regulation
Analysis of whether NMD4, like histone H4, influences virulence gene expression
Host Response Studies:
Cytokine profiling during infection with wildtype versus NMD4 mutants
Analysis of phagolysosome maturation in infected macrophages
Host cell death pathway activation comparison
Research approaches should include:
Clinical Isolate Analysis:
Sequencing NMD4 from diverse clinical isolates to identify polymorphisms
Expression analysis in isolates from different infection sites
Correlation of NMD4 sequence variants with virulence or drug resistance phenotypes
Stress Response Characterization:
Growth curves under clinically relevant stressors
Transcriptome and proteome analysis during stress adaptation
Time-course studies to determine immediate versus adaptive responses
Host Niche Adaptation:
Survival in artificial urine, blood, or cerebrospinal fluid models
Competition assays between wildtype and NMD4 mutants in mixed infections
Analysis of metabolic adaptation in different host environments
Investigation should focus on:
Susceptibility Testing:
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination for major antifungal classes
Time-kill kinetics to assess rate of fungicidal activity
Post-antifungal effect measurement
Biofilm susceptibility testing
Resistance Mechanism Analysis:
Assessment of efflux pump expression and activity in NMD4 mutants
Ergosterol biosynthesis pathway analysis
Cell wall composition and integrity testing
Target enzyme expression level measurement
Evolution Studies:
Laboratory evolution of resistance under drug pressure
Comparison of resistance acquisition rates
Whole genome sequencing to identify compensatory mutations
Fitness cost analysis of resistance mutations
Expression System Comparison:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Optimization Strategies |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, simple cultivation | Possible folding issues with eukaryotic proteins | Codon optimization, fusion tags, lowered induction temperature |
| S. cerevisiae | Similar cellular context to native protein | Lower yield than bacterial systems | Strong inducible promoters, protease-deficient strains |
| Pichia pastoris | High-density cultivation, strong promotion | Longer development time | Methanol induction optimization, multi-copy integrants |
| Baculovirus-insect cell | Eukaryotic processing, high expression | Complex system, higher cost | Optimized viral titers, cell line selection |
| Mammalian cells | Most authentic post-translational modifications | Highest cost, lowest yield | Stable cell line development, optimized media |
Construct Design Considerations:
Inclusion of purification tags (His, GST, FLAG)
Protease cleavage sites for tag removal
Domain-based expression for difficult-to-express proteins
Solubility-enhancing fusion partners
Expression Optimization Parameters:
Temperature and induction timing
Media composition and supplements
Cell density at induction
Harvest timing to maximize yield
Purification Protocol Development:
Initial capture via affinity chromatography matching chosen tag
Intermediate purification using ion exchange chromatography
Polishing step via size exclusion chromatography
Activity assays at each purification step to track functional recovery
Buffer Optimization:
Systematic screening of pH and ionic strength
Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents)
Testing protease inhibitor requirements
Assessment of metal ion requirements or inhibition
Protein Quality Assessment:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy for secondary structure verification
Dynamic light scattering for aggregation analysis
Thermal shift assays for stability assessment
Limited proteolysis to identify stable domains
Biochemical Activity Assays:
ATPase activity measurement if NMD4 possesses this function
RNA binding assays using fluorescence anisotropy
Protein-protein interaction assays via surface plasmon resonance
In vitro reconstitution of minimal NMD complexes
Cell-Based Functional Assays:
Complementation of NMD4 knockout in C. glabrata
Reporter systems with PTC-containing transcripts
Transcriptome analysis after NMD4 re-expression
Stress recovery assays in complemented strains
Structure-Function Analysis:
Identification of critical residues through site-directed mutagenesis
Domain truncation studies to map functional regions
Cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational dynamics
Analytical approaches should include:
Sequence Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment of NMD4 orthologs
Calculation of evolutionary rates (dN/dS) across different domains
Identification of species-specific insertions or deletions
Analysis of selective pressure on different functional domains
Structural Bioinformatics:
Homology modeling based on related structures
Conservation mapping onto predicted structures
Identification of species-specific surface features
Protein-protein interaction interface prediction
Functional Divergence:
Cross-species complementation experiments
Domain-swapping between orthologs to identify species-specific functions
Correlation of sequence features with ecological niches
Analysis of co-evolution with other NMD pathway components
Regulatory Evolution:
Promoter comparison across species
Analysis of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Identification of species-specific alternative splicing
Research strategies should involve:
Pathway Component Identification:
Genome mining for all known NMD factors across species
Assessment of component conservation and loss events
Identification of lineage-specific additions to the pathway
Detection of gene duplication and diversification
Interaction Network Comparison:
Interactome determination in multiple species
Cross-species analysis of protein complex composition
Identification of conserved versus species-specific interactions
Correlation of network architecture with pathway efficiency
Substrate Specificity Analysis:
Transcriptome-wide identification of NMD targets in multiple species
Comparison of PTC recognition mechanisms
Analysis of species-specific regulatory targets
Correlation with virulence-associated transcripts
Research approaches should focus on:
Comparative Mechanism Analysis:
Detailed comparison of PTC recognition mechanisms
Analysis of protein-protein interaction interfaces
Substrate specificity differences
Regulatory pathway differences
Structural Divergence:
Identification of fungi-specific binding pockets or domains
Analysis of surface electrostatic properties
Ligand binding site comparison
Conformational dynamics differences
Target Validation:
Essentiality assessment through gene deletion
Phenotypic consequences of NMD inhibition
Effects on virulence and stress adaptation
Potential for resistance development
Therapeutic Development Strategy:
Structure-based design targeting fungi-specific features
High-throughput screening against recombinant fungal proteins
Repurposing screens of approved drugs
Validation in cellular and infection models
Investigation methodologies should include:
Global Interaction Mapping:
Synthetic genetic array analysis with other RNA processing factors
Protein-protein interaction screening with RNA decay machineries
Transcriptome-wide analysis of RNA processing defects in NMD4 mutants
Ribosome profiling to assess translation effects
Pathway Integration Analysis:
Double mutant phenotyping with other quality control pathways
Analysis of functional overlap with no-go decay and non-stop decay
Investigation of connections with stress granule and P-body components
Assessment of links to homologous recombination pathways, which are known to be affected by histone levels in C. glabrata
Regulatory Network Construction:
Identification of transcription factors controlling NMD components
Analysis of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Assessment of feedback loops within the system
Computational modeling of network dynamics
Experimental design should involve:
Comprehensive RNA-seq Analysis:
Comparison of wildtype versus NMD4 deletion under standard conditions
Transcriptome profiling under host-relevant stresses
Time-course analysis during stress adaptation
Single-cell RNA-seq for population heterogeneity assessment
Data Analysis Strategy:
Differential expression analysis with appropriate statistical controls
Pathway enrichment analysis of affected transcripts
Alternative splicing and 3' UTR analysis
Integration with proteomics data for comprehensive understanding
NMD Target Classification:
Identification of direct versus indirect effects through decay rate measurement
Classification of targets by NMD-triggering features
Correlation with functional categories
Assessment of condition-specific regulation
Validation Studies:
qRT-PCR confirmation of key targets
Reporter construct analysis for selected transcripts
Measurement of mRNA half-lives for candidate targets
Functional characterization of regulated pathways
Research approaches should include:
Environmental Response Profiling:
NMD4 expression and localization under various stresses
Activity assays under different conditions
Post-translational modification analysis
Protein-protein interaction dynamics during stress
Signaling Pathway Integration:
Analysis of kinase-dependent regulation
Investigation of connections to known stress response pathways
Assessment of phosphorylation-dependent activity changes
Identification of upstream regulators
Host-Pathogen Interface Studies:
NMD4 activity during macrophage interaction
Response to host-derived stressors
Regulation during biofilm formation
Adaptation during different infection stages
Temporal Dynamics:
Real-time analysis of NMD4 activity using reporter systems
Population-level versus single-cell responses
Memory effects after repeated stress exposure
Correlation with pathogen survival and proliferation rates