Recombinant Candida glabrata Ras modification protein ERF4 (ERF4)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Function of ERF4

ERF4 is essential for the stable formation of the palmitoyl-ERF2 intermediate, which is the first step in palmitoyl transfer to protein substrates . Without ERF4, the rate of hydrolysis at the active site of the palmitoyl thioester intermediate increases, leading to reduced palmitoyl transfer to a Ras2 substrate .

One key role of ERF4 is to regulate ERF2 stability through an ubiquitin-mediated pathway . ERF4 affects the stability, autopalmitoylation, and palmitoyltransferase activity of ERF2 .

Role in Azole Resistance

The transcription factor CgRpn4 in Candida glabrata is a determinant of azole drug resistance . Deleting CgRPN4 increases sensitivity to azole drugs, while its overexpression increases tolerance to fluconazole and ketoconazole . CgRpn4 regulates the expression of 212 genes, activating 80 genes and repressing 132 genes upon fluconazole exposure . The genes activated by CgRpn4 include those involved in the proteasome and ubiquitination, lipid and fatty acid metabolism, and the stress response . Repressed genes are enriched in cell wall organization and carbon metabolism . CgRpn4 is required for maintaining ergosterol levels upon fluconazole stress, which is associated with a role in the upkeep of cell permeability and decreased intracellular fluconazole accumulation .

Role in Stress Resistance

Histone modification is a key mechanism by which Candida glabrata resists host defense peptides and caspofungin . Mutants lacking genes involved in histone modification, such as ADA2, GCN5, SPT8, HOS2, RPD3, and SPP1, show increased susceptibility to host defense peptides and caspofungin . Deletion of ADA2, GCN5, and RPD3 also increases susceptibility to mammalian host defense peptides . The Δ ada2 and Δ gcn5 mutants exhibit increased susceptibility to other stressors, such as $$H_2O_2$$ and SDS .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder *Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.*
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates. *Note: All protein shipments include standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.*
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process. The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ERF4; CAGL0E02189gRas modification protein ERF4
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-265
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Candida glabrata (strain ATCC 2001 / CBS 138 / JCM 3761 / NBRC 0622 / NRRL Y-65) (Yeast) (Torulopsis glabrata)
Target Names
ERF4
Target Protein Sequence
MYTDLEDNEN RFYTNSDVIL EEGTLGSSLG RSSRRTHEKG EDVQDPVFFN VHEVTESYFA DITNPTVFRD HDEDHSLCVT HFMNVYASQD SRLFEETRVV RIPRRFDMGN RWYPMFSDLL PGSEPGAILH DTDGLQFVPR GITQDGNVYG YSSVSPLSLY LTQQHFQEIV TTINDILLAT YSTYGFYNIL NIILEVFTLG LWSYVCKRIN YALSIDPMKR LDVYVRELNA SPAFVEAQIK LINPRDSGFL SLDFQIPKPK SISTQ
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The ERF2-ERF4 complex functions as a palmitoyltransferase specific to Ras proteins. It palmitoylates RAS2, a crucial process for its correct localization to the plasma membrane.
Database Links
Protein Families
ERF4 family
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Peripheral membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the functional role of ERF4 in C. glabrata stress response?

ERF4 likely plays a role in the stress response pathways of C. glabrata, potentially parallel to or intersecting with established stress response mechanisms. Research on C. glabrata has identified unique stress response pathways that differ from model organisms like S. cerevisiae. For instance, C. glabrata employs an Ire1-dependent mechanism for ER stress response that functions independently of Hac1 . When studying ERF4, researchers should consider testing its function under various stress conditions (oxidative, ER, hypoxic) using similar methodologies to those employed in the characterization of other C. glabrata stress response proteins.

How does ERF4 compare to homologous proteins in related Candida species?

When investigating ERF4, researchers should conduct phylogenetic analysis similar to those performed for other C. glabrata proteins. For example, researchers identified that C. glabrata maintains two Hap1 homologs (Zcf27 and Zcf4) that evolved to serve distinct roles in adapting to specific host and environmental conditions . For ERF4 characterization, perform comparative genomics across Candida species to identify functional conservation and divergence.

Recommended methodology:

  • Perform protein BLAST searches against other Candida species

  • Generate multiple sequence alignments

  • Construct phylogenetic trees to determine evolutionary relationships

  • Complement with functional studies in heterologous systems

What expression systems are optimal for producing recombinant C. glabrata ERF4?

Based on successful expression of other C. glabrata proteins, consider these expression systems:

Expression SystemAdvantagesConsiderations for ERF4
E. coliHigh yield, simplicityMay lack post-translational modifications
S. cerevisiaeEukaryotic modifications, genetic similarityPotential for complementation studies
C. glabrataNative modifications, authentic functionMore challenging transformation
Mammalian cellsComplex modificationsHigher cost, lower yield

When choosing an expression system, consider that C. glabrata proteins may require specific conditions for proper folding and function, as demonstrated in studies of Ire1 where both protein kinase and nuclease domains were functionally important .

What gene deletion strategies are most effective for studying ERF4 function in C. glabrata?

For generating ERF4 deletion mutants, adapt methodologies used successfully for other C. glabrata genes:

  • Use PCR-based gene disruption with carefully designed primers containing 50-60bp homology to target locus

  • Employ selectable markers appropriate for C. glabrata (NAT1, CgHIS3, CgTRP1)

  • Confirm deletions by both PCR and phenotypic analysis

  • Create complemented strains with wild-type ERF4 to confirm phenotype specificity

Researchers should note that when studying Ire1 in C. glabrata, targeted mutations in functional domains (such as the D723N and K725N in the kinase domain) provided valuable insights into domain-specific functions . Similar approaches could be applied to ERF4 functional domains.

How can RNA-sequencing approaches identify ERF4-dependent transcriptional networks?

RNA-sequencing is valuable for understanding the global impact of ERF4. Based on transcriptomic studies of other C. glabrata regulatory proteins:

  • Design experiments comparing wild-type, ERF4 deletion, and complemented strains

  • Include relevant stress conditions (consider testing conditions like azole treatment that revealed distinct roles for Zcf27 and Zcf4)

  • Apply robust statistical analysis with appropriate FDR correction

  • Validate key targets using qRT-PCR

Studies of stress response in C. glabrata have revealed that 325 genes were differentially regulated under TM treatment, with 75 genes upregulated in the wild-type strain . Similar comprehensive analysis should be applied to ERF4 studies.

How might ERF4 interact with established stress response pathways in C. glabrata?

When investigating ERF4's role in stress response, consider its potential interaction with known pathways:

  • Unfolded protein response (UPR): Unlike S. cerevisiae, C. glabrata employs an Ire1-dependent but Hac1-independent mechanism for ER stress response . Examine whether ERF4 functions in this non-canonical pathway.

  • Calcineurin signaling: Microarray analysis revealed that transcriptional response to ER stress in C. glabrata is largely dependent on calcineurin signaling and partially on the Slt2 MAPK pathway . Test for ERF4 involvement in these pathways through genetic interaction studies.

  • Azole resistance mechanisms: C. glabrata exhibits intrinsic resistance to azole antifungal drugs. Investigate whether ERF4 contributes to this resistance, similar to studies of Zcf27 which showed altered susceptibility to azole drugs .

Experimental approach: Generate double mutants (ERF4Δ with IRE1Δ, CNB1Δ, or ZCF27Δ) to test for genetic interactions and shared pathway functions.

What chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) strategies are effective for identifying ERF4 binding sites?

For characterizing ERF4 DNA-binding properties:

  • Generate epitope-tagged ERF4 constructs (3×HA or TAP tag) under native promoter

  • Perform ChIP followed by qPCR for candidate targets or ChIP-seq for genome-wide binding profile

  • Compare binding patterns under different stress conditions

  • Identify binding motifs using computational approaches

Studies of Zcf27 and Zcf4 demonstrated that these transcription factors associate with promoters of ERG genes, with enrichment enhanced upon azole treatment or hypoxic conditions, respectively . Similar approaches could reveal condition-specific binding patterns for ERF4.

How do post-translational modifications affect ERF4 function?

Given the importance of protein modifications in regulating signaling proteins:

  • Use mass spectrometry to identify phosphorylation, ubiquitination, or other modifications

  • Generate site-specific mutants to test functional significance of modifications

  • Examine modification changes under various stress conditions

  • Investigate kinases or other enzymes responsible for these modifications

Research on C. glabrata Ire1 demonstrated that its protein kinase function was required for the ER stress response, highlighting the importance of phosphorylation in stress response pathways .

What approaches can overcome difficulties in detecting low-abundance proteins like ERF4?

For improving detection of low-abundance C. glabrata proteins:

Technical ChallengeSolutionApplication to ERF4
Low expression levelUse stronger promoters (TEF1, PGK1)Generate overexpression constructs
Protein instabilityAdd proteasome inhibitors during extractionTest multiple extraction conditions
Poor antibody recognitionUse epitope tagging (FLAG, HA, MYC)Create tagged versions for detection
Low sensitivityEmploy more sensitive detection methods (chemiluminescence)Optimize signal development time

The research on Zcf4 revealed that it is barely detected under aerobic conditions but specifically induced under hypoxic conditions . Similar condition-dependent expression might occur with ERF4, necessitating careful optimization of detection methods.

How can contradictory results in ERF4 functional studies be reconciled?

When facing contradictory data:

  • Systematically vary experimental conditions (media, temperature, pH, stress levels)

  • Test multiple strain backgrounds to account for genetic variability

  • Use complementary approaches (genetic, biochemical, computational)

  • Consider strain-specific adaptations or compensatory mechanisms

Research on C. glabrata stress response mechanisms demonstrated that seemingly contradictory results can reveal biological complexity. For example, the discovery that C. glabrata has lost the canonical UPR but instead possesses the RIDD pathway contradicted initial assumptions about conservation of stress response mechanisms .

What host-pathogen interaction studies would illuminate ERF4's role in virulence?

To investigate ERF4's potential role in pathogenesis:

  • Perform infection studies using the ERF4Δ mutant in appropriate mouse models

  • Analyze fungal burden, cytokine profiles, and histopathology

  • Examine ERF4 expression during host cell interaction using ex vivo models

  • Test ERF4's role in phagocyte survival

Research has uncovered attenuated virulence of C. glabrata Δire1 mutant in a mouse model of disseminated candidiasis , suggesting that stress response proteins can significantly impact pathogenicity.

How might ERF4 contribute to antifungal drug resistance mechanisms?

To investigate potential roles in drug resistance:

  • Determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for various antifungals in ERF4Δ strains

  • Monitor ERF4 expression levels in clinical isolates with different drug susceptibility profiles

  • Test for genetic interactions between ERF4 and known resistance genes

  • Examine ERF4's impact on membrane ergosterol content

Studies on Zcf27 demonstrated that its deletion resulted in increased azole susceptibility due to decreased azole-induced expression of ERG genes and reduced total ergosterol levels . Similar mechanisms might involve ERF4.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.