Recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b, chloroplastic (atpF)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Carica papaya ATP Synthase Subunit b, Chloroplastic (atpF)

Recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b, chloroplastic (atpF), is a protein derived from the papaya plant, specifically engineered for research purposes. This subunit is part of the ATP synthase complex, which plays a crucial role in generating ATP (adenosine triphosphate) in chloroplasts. ATP synthase is essential for photosynthesis, converting light energy into chemical energy stored in ATP.

Structure and Function

The ATP synthase complex in chloroplasts consists of two main parts: the F0 sector embedded in the thylakoid membrane and the F1 sector protruding into the stroma. The subunit b (atpF) is part of the F0 sector, which is responsible for proton translocation across the membrane. This process drives the rotation of the stalk subunits, leading to the synthesis of ATP in the F1 sector.

ComponentFunctionLocation
F0 SectorProton TranslocationThylakoid Membrane
F1 SectorATP SynthesisStroma
Subunit b (atpF)Part of F0 Sector, involved in proton translocationThylakoid Membrane

Recombinant Production

Recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b, chloroplastic (atpF), is produced using genetic engineering techniques. The gene encoding this subunit is inserted into a suitable host organism, such as E. coli, where it is expressed and purified. This process allows for large-scale production of the protein for research purposes.

Applications in Research

This recombinant protein is primarily used in laboratory settings for studying the structure and function of chloroplastic ATP synthase. It can be used in various biochemical assays to understand the mechanisms of ATP synthesis and the role of subunit b in proton translocation. Additionally, it may be employed in ELISA kits for detecting specific antibodies against this subunit.

ApplicationDescription
Biochemical AssaysStudying ATP synthesis mechanisms and proton translocation
ELISA KitsDetecting antibodies against subunit b (atpF)

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, provided as a guideline for your reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is finalized during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us for preferential development.
Synonyms
atpF; ATP synthase subunit b, chloroplastic; ATP synthase F(0 sector subunit b; ATPase subunit I
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-184
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Carica papaya (Papaya)
Target Names
atpF
Target Protein Sequence
MKNVTDSFVFLGHWPSAGSFGFNTDILATNPINLSVVLGVLIFFGKGVLSDLLDNRKQRI LNTIRNSEELRDGAIEQLEKARARLRKVEMEAEQFRVNGYSEIEREKWNLINSTSKTLEQ LENYKNETIQFEQQRAINQVRQRVFQQALQGAIGTLNSCLSNELHLRTINANIGMFGAMK EITD
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
F(1)F(0) ATP synthase catalyzes ATP synthesis from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. This enzyme comprises two domains: the extramembraneous catalytic F(1) domain and the membrane-bound proton channel F(0) domain, connected by a central and a peripheral stalk. ATP synthesis in the F(1) catalytic domain is coupled to proton translocation through the rotary mechanism of the central stalk subunits. This protein is a component of the F(0) channel and forms part of the peripheral stalk, linking F(1) and F(0).
Database Links

KEGG: cpap:5878397

Protein Families
ATPase B chain family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast thylakoid membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the basic structure and function of ATP synthase subunit b in Carica papaya chloroplasts?

Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) is a critical component of the membrane-embedded F₀ domain of the chloroplastic ATP synthase complex. This subunit forms part of the peripheral stalk, connecting the catalytic F₁ domain to the membrane-integrated F₀ domain. In chloroplasts, this connection is essential for maintaining the structural integrity necessary for ATP synthesis during photosynthesis.

The subunit b typically consists of a hydrophobic N-terminal region that anchors it to the thylakoid membrane and a hydrophilic C-terminal domain that extends into the stroma to interact with other subunits of the ATP synthase complex. Similar to other plants, the Carica papaya atpF gene is likely encoded in the chloroplast genome and plays a crucial role in energy transduction during photosynthesis .

How does chloroplastic ATP synthase subunit b differ from its mitochondrial counterpart?

Chloroplastic ATP synthase subunit b differs from its mitochondrial counterpart in several key ways:

  • Genetic origin: The chloroplastic subunit b (atpF) is typically encoded by the chloroplast genome, whereas the mitochondrial counterpart is nuclear-encoded.

  • Structural adaptations: Chloroplastic subunit b has evolved specific structural features for functioning in the thylakoid membrane environment, with adaptations for light-dependent ATP synthesis.

  • Regulatory mechanisms: Chloroplastic ATP synthase is regulated by light-dependent processes and redox regulation, while mitochondrial ATP synthase responds to respiratory substrates and membrane potential.

  • Protein interaction network: The chloroplastic subunit b interacts with chloroplast-specific assembly factors and other subunits, forming a unique interactome distinct from the mitochondrial counterpart .

What are the optimal expression systems for producing recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b?

For optimal expression of recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b, researchers should consider the following expression systems and methodologies:

E. coli Expression System:

  • Vector selection: pET-21(a)-His vector or similar expression vectors that incorporate a His-tag for purification

  • Host strain: BL21(DE3) or Rosetta for improved expression of plant proteins

  • Induction conditions: 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at 18-25°C for 16-24 hours to reduce inclusion body formation

Protein Production Optimization Table:

ParameterRecommended RangeNotes
Growth temperature18-25°CLower temperatures reduce inclusion body formation
IPTG concentration0.5-1.0 mMOptimize based on preliminary expression tests
Post-induction time16-24 hoursExtended time improves yield for membrane-associated proteins
MediaLB with 2% glucoseGlucose helps maintain plasmid stability
Cell density at inductionOD₆₀₀ 0.6-0.8Induction during log phase improves yield

Similar strategies to those used for expressing other chloroplastic proteins in Carica papaya may be effective, as demonstrated in the expression of CpGH3 proteins .

What purification strategies yield the highest purity and activity for recombinant atpF protein?

For optimal purification of recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF), a multi-step purification strategy is recommended:

  • Initial Extraction:

    • Homogenize E. coli cells in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6) containing 2 mM EDTA, protease inhibitor cocktail, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol

    • Centrifuge at 12,000 × g for 30 minutes to separate soluble and membrane fractions

  • Membrane Protein Solubilization:

    • Treat membrane fraction with 1% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside (DDM) or 1% digitonin for 1 hour at 4°C

    • Centrifuge at 100,000 × g for 1 hour to remove insoluble material

  • Affinity Chromatography:

    • Apply solubilized protein to His GraviTrap columns for His-tagged protein purification

    • Use step-wise imidazole gradient (10 mM, 20 mM, 50 mM, 250 mM) to improve purity

  • Size Exclusion Chromatography:

    • Further purify using Superdex 200 column to separate monomeric protein from aggregates

    • Buffer composition: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% DDM

  • Protein Concentration Determination:

    • Use Protein Quantification Kit-Rapid for accurate determination of protein concentration

This approach typically yields >95% pure protein suitable for structural and functional studies.

What are the most reliable methods for assessing the functional activity of recombinant atpF protein?

To reliably assess the functional activity of recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF), researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches:

1. ATP Hydrolysis Activity Assay:

  • Measure ATP hydrolysis in reconstituted systems containing recombinant atpF and other essential ATP synthase subunits

  • Monitor inorganic phosphate release using malachite green or enzyme-coupled assays

  • Compare activity with and without atpF to determine its contribution to the complex

2. Reconstitution Assays:

  • Reconstitute atpF with other purified ATP synthase subunits in liposomes

  • Assess ATP synthesis capacity upon establishment of a proton gradient

  • Methodology similar to in vitro reconstitution assays described for cF₁ catalytic core assembly

3. Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis:

  • Use pull-down assays to verify interactions with other ATP synthase subunits

  • Employ Y2H (yeast two-hybrid) analysis to identify interaction partners

  • Analyze interaction strength using surface plasmon resonance or microscale thermophoresis

4. Structural Integrity Assessment:

  • Use circular dichroism to assess secondary structure composition

  • Employ limited proteolysis to verify proper folding

  • Analyze thermal stability using differential scanning fluorimetry

Each of these methods contributes to a comprehensive understanding of atpF functionality, with reconstitution assays providing the most physiologically relevant information about its role in ATP synthesis.

How can researchers accurately quantify the binding affinity between atpF and other ATP synthase subunits?

Accurate quantification of binding affinities between Carica papaya atpF and other ATP synthase subunits requires sophisticated biophysical techniques:

1. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):

  • Immobilize purified atpF on a sensor chip

  • Flow solutions containing other ATP synthase subunits at varying concentrations

  • Calculate association (ka) and dissociation (kd) rate constants

  • Determine equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) from the ratio kd/ka

2. Microscale Thermophoresis (MST):

  • Label atpF with a fluorescent dye

  • Titrate with increasing concentrations of interaction partners

  • Measure changes in thermophoretic mobility to determine binding affinities

  • Advantages include low sample consumption and analysis in solution

3. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):

  • Directly measure heat changes during binding events

  • Determine thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS, and KD)

  • No labeling required, providing label-free binding measurements

Binding Affinity Comparison Table:

Interaction PartnerEstimated KD Range (μM)Preferred MethodNotes
Subunit α0.1-1.0SPRStrong interaction expected
Subunit β0.5-5.0MSTModerate affinity
c-ring1.0-10.0ITCComplex interaction with the entire ring
δ subunit0.2-2.0SPR/MSTImportant for peripheral stalk assembly

These interaction studies should be designed with appropriate controls, including unrelated proteins and buffer-only conditions, to ensure specificity of the measured interactions.

How do post-translational modifications affect the function of Carica papaya atpF protein?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly influence the function, stability, and interactions of Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF). Understanding these modifications is crucial for interpreting the protein's behavior in various experimental contexts:

1. N-terminal Processing:

  • The atpF protein undergoes N-terminal cleavage during chloroplast import

  • Processing occurs in two steps: first by the stromal processing peptidase, then by the thylakoid processing peptidase

  • The mature protein starts after removal of a bipartite transit peptide, similar to other chloroplast membrane proteins

  • Experimental verification: Compare molecular weights of recombinant vs. native protein by Western blotting

2. Phosphorylation:

  • Potential phosphorylation sites in the stromal domain regulate interaction with F₁ subunits

  • Phosphorylation status may change in response to light conditions, mediating activity regulation

  • Mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics can identify specific modified residues

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of phosphorylation sites (Ser→Ala or Ser→Asp) can assess functional relevance

3. Redox Modifications:

  • Conserved cysteine residues may form disulfide bonds or undergo other redox modifications

  • These modifications likely respond to chloroplast redox status, linking photosynthetic electron transport to ATP synthesis

  • DTT treatment can assess the impact of reducing conditions on protein function

Researchers should employ complementary strategies to study these PTMs, including mass spectrometry, site-directed mutagenesis, and activity assays under varying redox conditions to fully characterize their impact on atpF function.

What structural features of Carica papaya atpF are critical for its assembly into the ATP synthase complex?

The assembly of Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) into the functional ATP synthase complex depends on specific structural features:

1. Membrane-Anchoring Domain:

  • N-terminal hydrophobic domain (approximately 25-30 amino acids) anchors the protein in the thylakoid membrane

  • Critical for proper orientation and assembly within the F₀ complex

  • Mutations in this region disrupt membrane integration and subsequent complex assembly

2. Coiled-Coil Interaction Domains:

  • Extended α-helical regions form coiled-coil structures essential for interaction with other stalk subunits

  • These regions contain characteristic heptad repeats (a-b-c-d-e-f-g pattern) with hydrophobic residues at positions 'a' and 'd'

  • Disruption of these patterns through mutation severely impairs ATP synthase assembly

3. F₁-Connecting Domain:

  • C-terminal region interacts with the δ subunit of F₁

  • Contains conserved charged residues that form salt bridges with complementary charges on F₁ subunits

  • These interactions are essential for maintaining the connection between F₀ and F₁ during rotational catalysis

4. Assembly-Facilitating Elements:

  • Specific sequences serve as recognition sites for assembly factors like BFA1, which coordinates early steps of complex formation

  • These regions may not contribute to the final structure but are critical during biogenesis

Experimental approaches to study these features include:

  • Truncation analysis to identify minimal functional domains

  • Alanine-scanning mutagenesis to pinpoint critical residues

  • Crosslinking studies to map interaction interfaces with other subunits

  • Chimeric protein analysis, swapping domains with homologs from other species

These structural features work together to ensure proper integration into the ATP synthase complex, with defects in any domain potentially leading to assembly failure or functional impairment.

What are the key considerations for designing experiments to study atpF interactions with other ATP synthase subunits?

When designing experiments to study Carica papaya atpF interactions with other ATP synthase subunits, researchers should consider these critical factors:

1. Protein Preparation Strategy:

  • Express and purify individual subunits separately, maintaining their native conformations

  • Consider co-expression of interacting partners to enhance stability and solubility

  • Use mild detergents (0.05-0.1% DDM or digitonin) to maintain membrane protein structure

  • Verify protein quality by size-exclusion chromatography before interaction studies

2. Experimental Approach Selection:

  • For initial screening: Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) or pull-down assays to identify potential interactions

  • For interaction mapping: In vitro chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry

  • For quantitative analysis: Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

  • For in vivo validation: Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) in plant protoplasts

3. Controls and Validation:

  • Positive controls: Use known interacting subunits (e.g., α/β heterodimers)

  • Negative controls: Include unrelated proteins of similar size/charge

  • Competitive binding assays: Verify specificity with unlabeled competitors

  • Mutational analysis: Confirm binding sites by targeted mutations of predicted interface residues

4. Environmental Considerations:

  • Buffer composition: Test multiple pH values (7.0-8.6) and salt concentrations (50-250 mM)

  • Redox conditions: Include reducing agents (DTT or 2-mercaptoethanol) to prevent artificial disulfide formation

  • Temperature: Perform experiments at 4°C and 25°C to assess temperature dependence

  • Divalent cations: Include physiological concentrations of Mg²⁺ (5 mM) as needed for ATP-dependent interactions

Experimental Design Decision Matrix:

Research QuestionRecommended Primary MethodSecondary ValidationKey Controls
Initial interaction screeningY2H or pull-downCo-immunoprecipitationUnrelated proteins
Binding site mappingCross-linking/MSAlanine scanning mutagenesisModified vs. unmodified protein
Quantitative binding parametersSPR or ITCFluorescence anisotropyConcentration series
In vivo assemblyBiFC in protoplastsCo-localization studiesFluorescent protein alone

Following these considerations will enhance experimental rigor and increase the reliability of results when studying atpF interactions within the ATP synthase complex.

How can researchers overcome common challenges in expressing and isolating functional recombinant atpF protein?

Researchers frequently encounter challenges when expressing and isolating functional recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF). Here are evidence-based strategies to overcome these obstacles:

1. Addressing Poor Expression Yields:

  • Optimize codon usage for E. coli expression using codon adaptation index (CAI) analysis

  • Use specialized expression strains (Rosetta, C41/C43) designed for membrane proteins

  • Lower incubation temperature to 16-18°C during induction to improve proper folding

  • Add molecular chaperones by co-transforming with plasmids expressing GroEL/GroES

2. Resolving Protein Solubility Issues:

  • Create fusion proteins with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, TrxA) at the N-terminus

  • Express only the soluble domains for interaction studies when full-length protein is problematic

  • Supplement growth media with specific lipids that stabilize membrane proteins

  • Screen different detergents for optimal solubilization:

DetergentConcentration RangeBest For
DDM0.05-1%Initial extraction
Digitonin0.5-1%Maintaining native interactions
LMNG0.01-0.05%Long-term stability
CHAPS0.5-1%Crystallization preparations

3. Improving Protein Purity:

  • Implement multi-step purification: IMAC followed by ion exchange and size exclusion chromatography

  • Use on-column detergent exchange during affinity purification

  • Apply gradient elution with imidazole (10-250 mM) to separate high-affinity binding proteins

  • Consider adding low concentrations of glycerol (5-10%) to stabilize the purified protein

4. Verifying Functional Activity:

  • Assess proper folding using circular dichroism before functional assays

  • Verify membrane insertion capacity by liposome reconstitution experiments

  • Conduct interaction studies with known binding partners (other ATP synthase subunits)

  • Compare properties with native protein extracted from Carica papaya chloroplasts when possible

5. Addressing Proteolytic Degradation:

  • Add protease inhibitor cocktails throughout the purification process

  • Identify and mutate specific protease-sensitive sites without affecting function

  • Perform purification steps at 4°C and minimize handling time

  • Consider removing flexible regions prone to degradation based on structure prediction

These methodological approaches have proven effective in overcoming the challenges associated with membrane protein expression and purification, as demonstrated in successful studies of other chloroplastic proteins .

What analytical techniques can reveal connections between atpF expression and papaya stress responses?

To elucidate connections between ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) expression and stress responses in Carica papaya, researchers should employ multiple complementary analytical techniques:

1. Transcriptomic Analysis:

  • RNA-Seq to quantify atpF expression changes under various stress conditions

  • qRT-PCR validation of expression patterns using gene-specific primers

  • Comparison with other chloroplast-encoded and nuclear-encoded ATP synthase subunits

  • Analysis of transcript processing and maturation, as ATP synthase genes often undergo complex post-transcriptional regulation

2. Proteomic Approaches:

  • 2D-DIGE (Differential Gel Electrophoresis) to identify changes in atpF protein abundance

  • iTRAQ or TMT labeling for quantitative mass spectrometry

  • Phosphoproteomic analysis to detect stress-induced post-translational modifications

  • Blue-native PAGE to assess changes in ATP synthase complex assembly under stress conditions

3. Physiological Measurements:

4. Integrative Approaches:

  • Correlation analysis between atpF expression levels and stress physiological markers

  • Network analysis to identify genes co-regulated with atpF under stress conditions

  • Comparison with known stress response mechanisms in other plant species

  • Multi-omics integration to provide comprehensive view of stress response pathways

Stress Response Analysis Protocol:

Stress TypeKey MeasurementsExpected atpF ResponseAnalytical Techniques
DroughtWater potential, ABA levelsDownregulation with severityRNA-Seq, qRT-PCR, BN-PAGE
HeatMembrane integrity, HSP expressionPost-translational modificationPhosphoproteomics, Complex assembly analysis
PathogenSalicylic acid, ROS productionPossible upregulationProteomics, ATP/ADP ratio
ColdMembrane fluidity, proline contentExpression changes affecting complex stabilityRNA-Seq, Chlorophyll fluorescence

A study on the effect of ascorbic acid (AsA) treatment showed that it influenced postharvest fruit quality parameters, suggesting that stress response mechanisms involving ATP metabolism may play important roles in papaya physiology . Similar experimental designs could be applied to study atpF specifically.

How can CRISPR/Cas9 technology be optimized for studying atpF function in Carica papaya?

Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 technology for studying ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) in Carica papaya requires specialized approaches due to the chloroplast location of the gene:

1. Targeting Strategy Development:

  • Design plastid-targeted CRISPR/Cas9 systems with chloroplast transit peptides

  • Select efficient guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting conserved regions of atpF

  • Use computational tools to predict off-target effects specific to the papaya plastome

  • Consider transplastomic approaches for direct editing of the chloroplast genome

2. Delivery Method Optimization:

Delivery MethodEfficiency in PapayaAdvantagesLimitations
Agrobacterium-mediatedModerate (15-25%)Established protocolsIndirect plastid targeting
Biolistic transformationHigh (30-40%)Direct plastid DNA accessEquipment intensive
PEG-mediated protoplastVariable (10-30%)Allows transient assaysRegeneration challenges
CRISPR ribonucleoproteinsEmerging techniqueNo DNA integrationDelivery to organelles difficult

3. Editing Strategy Selection:

  • Knockout approach: Create null mutations to assess loss-of-function phenotypes

  • Base editing: For precise nucleotide changes without double-strand breaks

  • Prime editing: For targeted insertions or complex edits

  • Consider inducible systems (e.g., dexamethasone-inducible) for temporal control

4. Screening and Validation Protocol:

  • PCR-based screening with primers flanking the target site

  • Restriction enzyme digestion assays for initial mutation detection

  • Sanger sequencing to confirm mutations and characterize editing events

  • Digital droplet PCR to quantify heteroplasmy levels in transplastomic lines

  • Protein analysis by western blotting to verify impact on atpF protein

5. Phenotypic Analysis Framework:

  • Measure ATP synthase activity in isolated chloroplasts

  • Assess photosynthetic parameters using chlorophyll fluorescence

  • Monitor growth and development under various light conditions

  • Evaluate fruit development and ripening characteristics in successful transformants

This comprehensive approach integrates molecular techniques with physiological analyses to enable detailed functional studies of atpF in Carica papaya, potentially revealing its roles in energy metabolism and fruit development.

What are the most promising approaches for engineering modified atpF proteins with enhanced functionality?

Engineering ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) proteins with enhanced functionality represents an emerging frontier in chloroplast biology research. The most promising approaches include:

1. Rational Design Based on Structural Insights:

  • Target the membrane-spanning domain to enhance proton conductance

  • Modify the stator stalk region to optimize stability during rotational catalysis

  • Engineer the F₁-interacting domain to strengthen coupling with catalytic subunits

  • Use homology modeling based on bacterial and mitochondrial counterparts to guide design

2. Directed Evolution Strategies:

  • Develop chloroplast-compatible selection systems for atpF variants

  • Create libraries with error-prone PCR or DNA shuffling

  • Screen for variants with improved thermal stability or catalytic efficiency

  • Use competitive growth assays under selective conditions to identify beneficial mutations

3. Hybrid Protein Engineering:

  • Create chimeric proteins incorporating functional domains from thermophilic organisms

  • Substitute critical regions with counterparts from species with desired properties

  • Test fusion proteins with stabilizing domains while maintaining functional interactions

  • Evaluate cross-species compatibility between ATP synthase components

4. Site-Directed Mutagenesis at Critical Residues:

  • Target conserved residues identified through evolutionary analysis

  • Modify charged residues at subunit interfaces to strengthen interactions

  • Introduce disulfide bridges to enhance stability under stress conditions

  • Create phosphomimetic mutations to simulate regulatory post-translational modifications

5. Synthetic Biology Approaches:

Engineering GoalTechnical ApproachExpected BenefitValidation Method
Enhanced stabilityThermostabilizing mutations identified from comparative genomicsImproved performance under heat stressThermal inactivation assays
Increased efficiencyModified proton-interacting residuesHigher ATP production per protonATP synthesis rate measurements
Stress toleranceIntroduction of redox-insensitive amino acidsMaintained function under oxidative stressActivity assays with H₂O₂ treatment
Altered regulationModification of regulatory sitesCustomized response to environmental signalsIn vitro reconstitution studies

These engineering approaches could potentially improve photosynthetic efficiency, stress tolerance, or post-harvest characteristics in papaya and other crops. Implementation would require sophisticated chloroplast transformation protocols and careful phenotypic analysis to assess the impact on plant physiology .

How can researchers address inconsistent results when studying atpF expression in papaya tissues?

When confronting inconsistent results in studies of ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) expression in papaya tissues, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

1. Sample Collection and Preparation Standardization:

  • Harvest tissues at consistent times of day to account for diurnal variations

  • Standardize developmental stages using objective metrics (e.g., days post-anthesis)

  • Implement rapid preservation methods (liquid N₂ flash-freezing) to prevent RNA/protein degradation

  • Document environmental conditions (light intensity, temperature, irrigation) for all samples

2. RNA Extraction and Quality Control:

  • Use specialized protocols for recalcitrant tissues with high polysaccharide content

  • Implement DNase treatment to eliminate chloroplast DNA contamination

  • Verify RNA integrity using RIN (RNA Integrity Number) scores >7

  • Assess chloroplast transcript enrichment using known chloroplast gene controls

3. Expression Analysis Method Refinement:

TechniqueCommon IssuesMitigation StrategiesQuality Controls
qRT-PCRPrimer inefficiencyDesign primers spanning exon junctionsStandard curves, melt curves
RNA-SeqChloroplast genome coverageRibodepletion methodsERCC spike-in controls
Northern blottingRNA degradationUse fresh reagents, RNase-free conditionsMultiple biological replicates
Western blottingCross-reactivityValidate antibodies with recombinant proteinInclude positive/negative controls

4. Data Normalization and Analysis:

  • Select appropriate reference genes verified for stability in papaya tissues

  • Use multiple reference genes rather than a single housekeeping gene

  • Apply tissue-specific normalization factors for cross-tissue comparisons

  • Consider absolute quantification for plastid genes with variable copy numbers

5. Accounting for Biological Variability:

  • Increase biological replicates (minimum n=5) to capture natural variation

  • Document fruit position on the plant for fruit-based studies

  • Consider the impact of environmental fluctuations during growth

  • Track changes in IAA-amido synthetase activity as it may correlate with developmental variation

6. Technical Validation Approaches:

  • Verify key findings using orthogonal methods (e.g., supplement qPCR with protein analysis)

  • Compare results across different extraction methods

  • Include spike-in controls to assess technical variation

  • Collaborate with other laboratories to cross-validate findings

What methodological approaches can resolve conflicting data on atpF post-translational modifications?

Resolving conflicting data on post-translational modifications (PTMs) of ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) requires sophisticated methodological approaches that can definitively characterize these modifications:

1. Advanced Mass Spectrometry Strategies:

  • Employ multiple fragmentation techniques (CID, ETD, HCD) to improve PTM identification

  • Use phosphoproteomic enrichment methods (TiO₂, IMAC) for phosphorylation analysis

  • Implement parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for targeted quantification of specific modified peptides

  • Apply intact protein mass spectrometry to determine the combinatorial pattern of modifications

2. Site-Specific Mutational Analysis:

  • Create point mutations at predicted modification sites (Ser→Ala, Lys→Arg)

  • Generate phosphomimetic mutations (Ser→Asp/Glu) to simulate constitutive phosphorylation

  • Compare functional properties of wild-type and mutant proteins in reconstitution assays

  • Assess impact on protein-protein interactions using quantitative binding assays

3. Confirmation with Orthogonal Techniques:

PTM TypePrimary DetectionComplementary MethodFunctional Validation
PhosphorylationLC-MS/MS with neutral lossPhospho-specific antibodiesIn vitro kinase assays
AcetylationMS with immonium ion detectionAnti-acetyl-Lys antibodiesDeacetylase sensitivity tests
OxidationMS with characteristic mass shiftsRedox-sensitive dyesDTT reversibility analysis
N-terminal processingEdman degradationN-terminal antibodiesMass comparison with predicted sequences

4. Temporal and Environmental Context Analysis:

  • Examine PTMs under different developmental stages and stress conditions

  • Compare modifications in different tissues (leaves versus fruit)

  • Track changes during the day/night cycle to identify light-responsive modifications

  • Assess modification patterns in response to treatments like ascorbic acid that affect fruit ripening

5. Structural Context Integration:

  • Map identified PTMs onto structural models of ATP synthase

  • Assess conservation of modification sites across species

  • Evaluate proximity to functional domains and protein interfaces

  • Conduct molecular dynamics simulations to predict functional consequences

6. Controlled Environmental Studies:

  • Implement consistent growth conditions to reduce variability

  • Use isolated chloroplast systems for in organello modification studies

  • Compare results between heterologous expression systems and native protein

  • Document all environmental parameters that might influence PTM patterns

By implementing this multi-faceted approach, researchers can resolve conflicting data and develop a consensus view of atpF post-translational modifications, their regulation, and functional significance in Carica papaya.

What are the most significant unanswered questions about Carica papaya atpF that warrant further research?

Several critical knowledge gaps regarding Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) remain to be addressed through focused research efforts:

  • Regulatory Mechanisms: How is atpF expression regulated in response to developmental cues and environmental stresses specific to tropical fruit crops like papaya? Understanding the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation will provide insights into energy metabolism adaptation.

  • Structural Uniqueness: What structural features distinguish papaya atpF from its counterparts in other plant species, particularly in relation to optimal function in tropical environments? Comparative structural biology approaches could reveal adaptations specific to papaya.

  • Interaction Networks: How does atpF interact with assembly factors like PAB, BFA1, and other auxiliary proteins during ATP synthase biogenesis in papaya chloroplasts ? Mapping these interaction networks would enhance our understanding of complex assembly.

  • Developmental Transitions: What role does atpF play during the transition from chloroplasts to chromoplasts during fruit ripening, and how does this impact energy metabolism throughout papaya fruit development?

  • Post-Translational Regulation: How do post-translational modifications of atpF respond to the unique physiological conditions experienced during papaya fruit development and ripening? The relationship between these modifications and fruit quality traits remains unexplored.

  • Climate Resilience: How might atpF function be affected by climate change factors (increased temperature, drought, altered precipitation patterns) in this economically important tropical crop?

  • Biotechnological Applications: Can targeted modifications of atpF improve photosynthetic efficiency, stress tolerance, or post-harvest characteristics in papaya? The potential for applying fundamental research to crop improvement remains largely untapped.

These questions represent promising directions for future research that could significantly advance our understanding of energy metabolism in papaya and potentially lead to applications in crop improvement.

What recommendations can be made for standardizing research protocols involving recombinant Carica papaya atpF protein?

To enhance reproducibility and facilitate cross-laboratory comparisons in research involving recombinant Carica papaya ATP synthase subunit b (atpF), the following standardization recommendations are proposed:

1. Gene Sequence and Expression Construct Standardization:

  • Adopt a consensus reference sequence derived from the papaya chloroplast genome

  • Standardize codon optimization strategies for heterologous expression

  • Use consistent affinity tags positioned at the same terminus (preferably C-terminal)

  • Deposit all constructs in publicly accessible repositories with detailed annotation

2. Expression and Purification Protocol Standardization:

Protocol StageRecommended StandardCritical ParametersQuality Control Metrics
Expression systemE. coli BL21(DE3)Induction: 0.5 mM IPTG, 18°C, 16hOD₆₀₀ at induction: 0.6-0.8
Cell lysisFrench press or sonicationBuffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM 2-MEComplete lysis verified by microscopy
Membrane extractionUltracentrifugation at 100,000×g1 hour at 4°CPellet resuspension in detergent buffer
Detergent solubilization1% DDM or 1% digitonin1 hour at 4°CClarity of supernatant after centrifugation
Affinity purificationHis GraviTrap columnsImidazole gradient: 10-250 mMPurity >90% by SDS-PAGE
Size exclusionSuperdex 200Flow rate: 0.5 mL/minMonodisperse peak profile

3. Functional Assay Standardization:

  • Implement consistent reconstitution protocols for assessing ATP synthase activity

  • Standardize liposome composition for membrane protein incorporation

  • Define standard conditions for measuring ATP hydrolysis and synthesis activities

  • Establish reference values for wild-type protein activity for cross-study comparison

4. Reporting Requirements:

  • Provide detailed methods including buffer compositions, incubation times, and temperatures

  • Report protein concentration determination methods with calibration standards

  • Include gel images showing protein purity and Western blots confirming identity

  • Document storage conditions and stability over time

5. Data Sharing and Collaboration:

  • Contribute structural data to Protein Data Bank with detailed metadata

  • Share negative results and technical challenges through appropriate platforms

  • Establish a community-wide database for atpF variants and their properties

  • Develop collaborative networks for cross-validation of key findings

6. Validation with Native Protein:

  • Compare recombinant protein properties with native atpF extracted from papaya chloroplasts

  • Document any differences in post-translational modifications or activity

  • Develop standardized extraction protocols for native protein to serve as reference

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.