Recombinant Ceratotherium simum ATP synthase protein 8 (MT-ATP8)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. However, if you have specific format requirements, please indicate them during order placement. We will accommodate your needs to the best of our ability.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please contact your local distributors for specific delivery timelines.
Note: All our proteins are shipped standard with blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance. Additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is discouraged. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We suggest adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard final glycerol concentration is 50%, which can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
We will determine the tag type during production. If you have a specific tag type in mind, please let us know, and we will prioritize development of the specified tag.
Synonyms
MT-ATP8; ATP8; ATPASE8; MTATP8; ATP synthase protein 8; A6L; F-ATPase subunit 8
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-68
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Ceratotherium simum (White rhinoceros) (Square-lipped rhinoceros)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MPQLDTSTWSITIVSMIITLFIMFQLKLSKYSYPSSPELKLTKTPTHTTPWESKWTKTYLPLSLPQQS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Mitochondrial membrane ATP synthase (F(1)F(0) ATP synthase or Complex V) catalyzes ATP synthesis from ADP in the presence of a proton gradient across the membrane. This gradient is generated by the electron transport complexes of the respiratory chain. F-type ATPases consist of two structural domains: F(1) - containing the extramembraneous catalytic core and F(0) - containing the membrane proton channel, linked together by a central stalk and a peripheral stalk. During catalysis, ATP synthesis in the catalytic domain of F(1) is coupled via a rotary mechanism of the central stalk subunits to proton translocation. This protein is part of the complex F(0) domain and is a minor subunit located within the membrane alongside subunit a.
Protein Families
ATPase protein 8 family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is MT-ATP8 and what is its function in mitochondria?

MT-ATP8 (mitochondrially encoded ATP synthase membrane subunit 8) is a small but essential component of mitochondrial ATP synthase, also known as Complex V of the electron transport chain. This subunit belongs to the F₀ complex of the large, transmembrane F-type ATP synthase. MT-ATP8 is involved in facilitating proton flow across the inner mitochondrial membrane, which creates the electrochemical gradient necessary for ATP production. This enzyme catalyzes the final step of oxidative phosphorylation, converting ADP to ATP by harnessing the energy from proton flow. The protein is encoded in the mitochondrial genome rather than the nuclear genome, which has implications for inheritance patterns and evolutionary considerations .

What is the structure and composition of Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8?

Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 is a small protein comprising 68 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 8 kDa. The full amino acid sequence is: MPQLDTSTWSITIVSMIITLFIMFQLKLSKYSYPSSPELKLTKTPTHTTPWESKWTKTYLPLSLPQQS . The protein contains a hydrophobic region that anchors it within the inner mitochondrial membrane. Like other MT-ATP8 proteins, it has a relatively simple structure and functions as part of the larger ATP synthase complex. When produced as a recombinant protein, it is often expressed using baculovirus expression systems, which can achieve purity levels above 85% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis .

What is the genomic organization of MT-ATP8 in the mitochondrial genome?

MT-ATP8 in mammals, including Ceratotherium simum, is encoded in the mitochondrial genome. An unusual feature of the MT-ATP8 gene is its 46-nucleotide overlap with the MT-ATP6 gene. With respect to the reading frame (+1) of MT-ATP8, the MT-ATP6 gene starts on the +3 reading frame . This overlapping gene organization is a common feature in the compact mitochondrial genome and represents an interesting example of genetic economy. When the complete human mitochondrial genome was first published, the MT-ATP8 gene was described as the unidentified reading frame URF A6L, indicating the historical development of our understanding of this gene .

How do post-translational modifications affect MT-ATP8 function in comparative studies?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of MT-ATP8 in Ceratotherium simum have not been extensively characterized, but based on studies of MT-ATP8 in other species, these modifications likely play crucial roles in regulating protein function, stability, and interactions within the ATP synthase complex. Researchers investigating these modifications should employ techniques such as mass spectrometry to identify phosphorylation, acetylation, or other modifications that may differ between species. When comparing rhinoceros MT-ATP8 with human or other mammalian versions, attention should be given to conserved modification sites that might indicate functional importance. Experimental designs should include appropriate controls and validation methods to confirm the presence and functional significance of identified PTMs.

How does the interaction between MT-ATP8 and other ATP synthase subunits differ in Ceratotherium simum?

The interaction between MT-ATP8 and other subunits of ATP synthase in Ceratotherium simum likely involves species-specific contacts that optimize complex assembly and function. To study these interactions, researchers should employ techniques such as co-immunoprecipitation, crosslinking mass spectrometry, or yeast two-hybrid assays using the recombinant protein. Particular attention should be paid to interactions with the MT-ATP6 subunit, given their genomic proximity and functional relationship. Structural modeling based on known ATP synthase structures from other species can guide the identification of potential interaction interfaces. Experimental designs should include validation of interactions in multiple systems and under varying physiological conditions to establish biological relevance.

What evolutionary adaptations are evident in Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 compared to other mammals?

Evolutionary analysis of Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 can reveal adaptations related to the species' unique metabolic demands and environmental pressures. Researchers should conduct comparative sequence analyses across mammals with diverse ecological niches, focusing on sites under positive selection. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) can identify regions under selection pressure. Functional studies comparing ATP synthase efficiency between rhinoceros and other species can link sequence differences to phenotypic adaptations. Analysis should also consider the coevolution of MT-ATP8 with other mitochondrial and nuclear-encoded subunits of ATP synthase to understand the coordinated evolution of this essential complex.

What are the optimal conditions for storing and handling recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8?

For optimal storage and handling of recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8, researchers should follow specific protocols to maintain protein stability and activity. The recombinant protein is typically available in either liquid or lyophilized form. For liquid preparations, storage at -20°C/-80°C provides a shelf life of approximately 6 months, while lyophilized forms can be stable for up to 12 months at the same temperatures . When reconstituting lyophilized protein, use deionized sterile water to achieve a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. The addition of glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% is recommended for long-term storage, with 50% being the standard recommendation . To minimize protein degradation, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles; instead, prepare working aliquots that can be stored at 4°C for up to one week . Before opening, briefly centrifuge vials to bring contents to the bottom.

What expression systems are most effective for producing functional recombinant MT-ATP8?

The most effective expression system for producing functional recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 is the baculovirus expression system, which allows for proper folding and post-translational modifications of this mitochondrial membrane protein . This system can achieve purity levels above 85% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. When designing expression constructs, researchers should consider including appropriate affinity tags that facilitate purification while minimizing interference with protein function. The tag type is often determined during the manufacturing process based on optimal expression and purification outcomes . Alternative expression systems such as E. coli may be considered for certain applications, but may require additional optimization to address challenges related to membrane protein expression, including inclusion body formation and proper folding. Regardless of the system chosen, expression conditions should be optimized for temperature, induction time, and media composition to maximize yield of functional protein.

What analytical methods should be used to verify recombinant MT-ATP8 quality and functionality?

To verify the quality and functionality of recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8, researchers should employ a multi-faceted analytical approach. SDS-PAGE analysis can confirm protein purity (target >85%) and approximate molecular weight. Western blotting using antibodies specific to MT-ATP8 or included affinity tags can verify protein identity. Mass spectrometry should be used to confirm the amino acid sequence and identify any post-translational modifications. Circular dichroism spectroscopy can assess secondary structure integrity. Functional assays should measure the protein's ability to integrate into liposomes or membrane mimetics and facilitate proton translocation. For studies requiring incorporation into ATP synthase complexes, researchers should verify assembly using blue native PAGE and measure ATP synthesis activity in reconstituted systems. Quality control should also include endotoxin testing for applications involving cell culture or in vivo experiments.

How can researchers incorporate recombinant MT-ATP8 into functional ATP synthase complexes for in vitro studies?

Incorporating recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 into functional ATP synthase complexes requires careful reconstitution approaches. Researchers should first solubilize the recombinant protein in appropriate detergents (e.g., digitonin, n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside) that maintain protein structure while allowing integration into membranes. For reconstitution with other ATP synthase subunits, stepwise assembly protocols beginning with the c-ring and other F₀ components before adding F₁ components have proven effective. Alternatively, researchers can use the recombinant MT-ATP8 to replace the native subunit in partially disassembled ATP synthase complexes isolated from mitochondria. Liposome reconstitution systems using lipid compositions that mimic the inner mitochondrial membrane can provide a suitable environment for complex assembly. Functionality of reconstituted complexes should be verified through ATP synthesis assays, proton pumping measurements, and structural analysis using electron microscopy or other imaging techniques.

How can researchers differentiate between native and recombinant MT-ATP8 in experimental samples?

Differentiating between native and recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 in experimental samples requires strategic analytical approaches. If the recombinant protein includes affinity tags, these provide straightforward targets for differential detection using tag-specific antibodies in Western blotting. Mass spectrometry can identify sequence differences, particularly if the recombinant version contains silent mutations or codon optimizations that don't affect amino acid sequence but create distinguishable peptide fragments after digestion. When both versions are present in the same sample, quantitative PCR with primers specific to each version can differentiate between mitochondrially encoded and recombinant transcripts. For functional studies, researchers can use specific inhibitors or antibodies that selectively target either the native or recombinant form based on structural differences. In cell culture systems, researchers can employ cells depleted of mitochondrial DNA (ρ⁰ cells) to eliminate background from native MT-ATP8 expression.

What approaches should be used to analyze MT-ATP8 integration into the ATP synthase complex?

Analyzing MT-ATP8 integration into ATP synthase complexes requires multiple complementary techniques. Blue native PAGE (BN-PAGE) allows visualization of intact complexes and can reveal assembly intermediates when comparing systems with native versus recombinant MT-ATP8. Crosslinking combined with mass spectrometry (XL-MS) can identify specific interaction partners and contact points between MT-ATP8 and other subunits. Cryo-electron microscopy provides structural insights into the position and orientation of the integrated subunit. Functional assays should measure ATP synthesis rates and proton translocation efficiency as indicators of successful integration. Researchers should employ both qualitative and quantitative approaches, using software like ImageJ for densitometric analysis of BN-PAGE results and statistical tools to compare integration efficiency across experimental conditions. Time-course experiments can provide insights into the kinetics of complex assembly with recombinant MT-ATP8 compared to native assembly processes.

How should researchers interpret contradictory results in MT-ATP8 functional studies?

When encountering contradictory results in MT-ATP8 functional studies, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach. First, evaluate experimental variables that might contribute to discrepancies, including protein preparation methods, storage conditions, and assay systems. The stability of recombinant MT-ATP8 is time and temperature-dependent, with different shelf lives for liquid (6 months) versus lyophilized (12 months) preparations . Consider whether differences in post-translational modifications might explain functional variations, as these can significantly impact protein activity. Verify the integrity and purity of the recombinant protein using multiple analytical methods, as degradation or contamination can lead to inconsistent results. Examine whether the expression system influences protein folding or activity; baculovirus-expressed MT-ATP8 may behave differently from protein expressed in other systems. Finally, consider species-specific effects when comparing results across studies using MT-ATP8 from different organisms, as the protein differs in sequence between Metazoa, plants, and fungi .

What bioinformatic tools are most useful for comparative analysis of MT-ATP8 across species?

For comparative analysis of MT-ATP8 across species, researchers should employ a suite of specialized bioinformatic tools. Multiple sequence alignment tools like MUSCLE, MAFFT, or Clustal Omega can reveal conserved regions and species-specific variations. Phylogenetic analysis using maximum likelihood (RAxML, PhyML) or Bayesian inference (MrBayes) methods can reconstruct evolutionary relationships and identify lineage-specific adaptations. Structural prediction tools like AlphaFold2 or I-TASSER can generate comparative models of MT-ATP8 from different species despite limited experimental structural data. Selection analysis tools like PAML, HyPhy, or FUBAR can identify sites under positive, negative, or relaxed selection. Protein-protein interaction prediction tools such as PRISM or HADDOCK can model species-specific differences in interactions with other ATP synthase subunits. For analyzing the consequences of sequence variations, tools like PROVEAN or PolyPhen-2 can predict the functional impact of amino acid substitutions. Researchers should integrate results from multiple tools and validate computational predictions with experimental data whenever possible.

How can recombinant MT-ATP8 be used in comparative mitochondrial function studies?

Recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 provides a valuable tool for comparative mitochondrial function studies. Researchers can use this protein to investigate species-specific adaptations in energy metabolism by comparing ATP synthase efficiency between white rhinoceros and other mammals. Experimental designs should incorporate the recombinant protein into reconstituted ATP synthase complexes containing components from different species to create chimeric complexes. These hybrid systems allow researchers to isolate the specific contribution of MT-ATP8 to observed functional differences. When conducting such studies, control experiments should include complexes with native proteins from each species. Measurements should focus on parameters like ATP synthesis rate, proton translocation efficiency, and complex stability under varying conditions (pH, temperature, ATP/ADP ratios). This approach can reveal how evolutionary adaptations in MT-ATP8 contribute to species-specific metabolic adaptations.

What are the best practices for using MT-ATP8 in protein-protein interaction studies?

When using recombinant Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 in protein-protein interaction studies, researchers should employ multiple complementary techniques to ensure robust results. Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against MT-ATP8 or potential interaction partners can identify stable interactions, while more transient interactions may require crosslinking approaches. Yeast two-hybrid or split-luciferase assays can validate direct interactions, though these may require optimization for membrane proteins like MT-ATP8. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or microscale thermophoresis (MST) can provide quantitative binding parameters including association/dissociation rates and binding affinities. When designing experiments, researchers should consider the membrane environment, as interactions involving MT-ATP8 may depend on lipid composition. Control experiments should include known interaction partners (e.g., MT-ATP6) as positive controls and unrelated proteins as negative controls. Data analysis should incorporate statistical validation and consider the impact of experimental conditions on observed interactions.

How can researchers use recombinant MT-ATP8 for developing species-specific antibodies?

Developing species-specific antibodies against Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 requires strategic immunization and validation approaches. Researchers should begin by identifying unique epitopes that differ from other species, particularly regions with low sequence conservation. The full amino acid sequence (MPQLDTSTWSITIVSMIITLFIMFQLKLSKYSYPSSPELKLTKTPTHTTPWESKWTKTYLPLSLPQQS) should be analyzed to select peptide regions that balance immunogenicity, accessibility, and species-specificity. For polyclonal antibody production, immunize rabbits or other suitable animals with the purified recombinant protein (>85% purity) or with synthetic peptides conjugated to carrier proteins. For monoclonal antibody development, screen hybridoma supernatants against both Ceratotherium simum MT-ATP8 and homologous proteins from other species to identify clones with the desired specificity. Validation should include Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry using tissues from white rhinoceros and other species to confirm specificity. Cross-reactivity testing is essential to determine the antibody's utility for comparative studies across different rhinoceros species or other mammals.

How does serum protein analysis in white rhinoceros relate to MT-ATP8 research?

While serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) studies in white rhinoceros, such as those establishing reference intervals for healthy and injured animals , do not directly analyze MT-ATP8, they provide important contextual information for mitochondrial research. The established reference intervals for total serum protein (76–111 g/L) and globulin fractions (α1a: 1.6–3.2 g/L; α1b: 1.7–3.6 g/L; α2: 16.1–26.6 g/L; β1: 6.6–18.2 g/L; β2: 11.8–30.4 g/L; γ: 10.4–23.1 g/L) serve as baseline data for assessing rhinoceros health. Researchers studying MT-ATP8 can correlate mitochondrial function with these protein profiles, particularly when investigating disease states or stress responses that might impact energy metabolism. For example, the observation that wounded rhinoceros had lower concentrations of total serum protein, albumin, and specific globulin fractions might indicate altered metabolic states that could influence mitochondrial function and ATP production. Integrating serum protein analysis with mitochondrial studies can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how organismal physiology relates to cellular energetics in this species.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.