Recombinant Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus Putative movement protein (ORF I)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Cestrum Yellow Leaf Curling Virus (CmYLCV)

Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus (CmYLCV) is identified as the causal agent of the Cestrum parqui mosaic disease . It is a plant pararetrovirus belonging to the Caulimoviridae family . The virus has a double-stranded DNA genome of 8253 base pairs, containing seven open reading frames (ORFs) . CmYLCV is closely related to the Soybean chlorotic mottle virus (SbCMV) .

Genomic Organization and ORFs of CmYLCV

The genome of CmYLCV comprises seven ORFs . These ORFs encode proteins essential for virus replication, movement, and pathogenesis. The arrangement and function of these ORFs are typical of plant pararetroviruses. The primer-binding site is located in the intercistronic region following ORF Ib, unlike other members of the SbCMV-like genus . Additionally, CmYLCV lacks an ORF corresponding to ORF VII found in other related viruses .

Recombinant Putative Movement Protein (ORF I)

The DNA-B segment of viruses like Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (ToLCNDV) encodes movement proteins (MPs) via ORFs such as BC1 . These MPs are crucial for cell-to-cell movement, facilitating systemic infection . In CmYLCV, ORF I is presumed to encode a movement protein due to its similarity to MPs found in other viruses .

Promoter Activity of CmYLCV

The promoter isolated from CmYLCV is highly active in various plant tissues, including callus, meristems, and vegetative and reproductive tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana tabacum, Lycopersicon esculentum, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa . The expression level is comparable to or higher than that of the CaMV 35S promoter, the 'super-promoter,' or the maize ubiquitin 1 promoters . The strong and constitutive activity in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, along with the narrow host range of CmYLCV, makes its promoter an attractive tool for regulating transgene expression in a wide variety of plant species .

Functional Analysis of Viral ORFs

Functional analyses of viral ORFs, such as ORF5 in Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2), have shown localization to the endoplasmic reticulum and interactions with various cellular proteins . These interactions can provide insights into the molecular mechanisms of viral pathogenicity . While specific functional analysis of CmYLCV ORF I is not detailed in the provided references, understanding the functions of similar ORFs in other viruses can offer a basis for future research .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipment of the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes, and we will accommodate your request to the best of our ability.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless otherwise requested. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ORF; I; Putative movement protein; Mov; Cell-to-cell transport protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-312
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus (CmYLCV)
Target Names
ORF
Target Protein Sequence
MDVLDYLDMS ESSEKFHVSV LSEKDKFKIE SADITLKEGD DFKRISTIRN IFDRKNVIFY GKYLSESFVK LETASGKFEL PIVNIDHIYD QISKIRNQEK RKTLSCIHIS TIQIVLKSTF LKGLDYPISL AITDERINNP KEKIIGIVHG NLATVTLKFS VHLGFAIPLT EEDLSRSISL TYKAYRNDLM NDQKQGFSIT YAVSYALANS HHSIQFANKD RIYLDEIFKQ VSFTEKPRPI SPIKPNGLKF LKKKPSNLED LIGVPRNHLS LQPPPLRVAR KDSEESSSTS VPEIENLTKQ VKDISSYLKD RL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein facilitates the direct transport of the viral genome to neighboring plant cells via plasmodesmata, without budding. It enables efficient cell-to-cell viral propagation by circumventing the plant cell wall. This function is achieved through the formation of tubular structures that increase the size exclusion limit (SEL) of plasmodesmata, allowing viral ribonucleocapsids to directly spread to adjacent cells.

Database Links

KEGG: vg:1732958

Protein Families
Caulimoviridae movement protein family
Subcellular Location
Host cell junction, host plasmodesma. Note=Assembles in tubules that are embedded within modified plasmodesmata.

Q&A

What is Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus and how is it characterized?

Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus (CmYLCV) has been identified as the causative agent of Cestrum parqui mosaic disease. The virus belongs to the Caulimoviridae family of plant pararetroviruses, with a fully sequenced genome of 8253 bp containing seven open reading frames (ORFs). CmYLCV has been confirmed as infectious through cloning and inoculation experiments with C. parqui. Phylogenetic analysis places CmYLCV in close relationship with the Soybean chlorotic mottle virus (SbCMV)-like genus, though it differs in key genomic features, such as the location of its primer-binding site in the intercistronic region following ORF Ib and the absence of an ORF corresponding to ORF VII .

To characterize CmYLCV in laboratory settings, researchers typically employ techniques such as PCR amplification of viral genomic segments, restriction enzyme digestion, and Southern blot hybridization to confirm infection. These methodologies are similar to those used for other plant viruses, as demonstrated in studies of related viruses where techniques like rolling circle amplification (RCA) and subsequent restriction enzyme digestion have been effective for viral detection .

How does the genetic structure of CmYLCV compare to other members of the Caulimoviridae family?

CmYLCV shares structural similarities with other members of the Caulimoviridae family but exhibits distinctive features that set it apart. Its genome contains all characteristic domains typically conserved in plant pararetroviruses. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that CmYLCV is most closely related to the Soybean chlorotic mottle virus (SbCMV)-like genus .

  • The primer-binding site in CmYLCV is located in the intercistronic region following ORF Ib, rather than within this ORF as seen in related viruses

  • CmYLCV lacks an ORF corresponding to ORF VII, which is present in other related viruses

These structural differences may contribute to CmYLCV's unique biological properties, including its narrow host range, which makes it particularly valuable for biotechnological applications.

What methodologies are most effective for expressing and purifying recombinant CmYLCV movement protein?

For successful expression and purification of recombinant CmYLCV movement protein (ORF I), researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

For researchers specifically interested in studying the functional aspects of the movement protein in planta, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) or transient expression systems may prove more informative than purified protein studies.

How can recombination events be detected and analyzed in CmYLCV genomes?

Recombination events in viral genomes such as CmYLCV can be crucial for understanding viral evolution and host adaptation. While the search results don't provide specific examples for CmYLCV, methodologies from related virus studies can be applied:

  • Sequence Collection and Alignment: Obtain a comprehensive dataset of CmYLCV sequences from various isolates and geographical regions. Perform multiple sequence alignment using tools like MUSCLE or MAFFT.

  • Recombination Detection Programs: Employ specialized software packages such as RDP4 (Recombination Detection Program), which incorporates multiple detection methods including:

    • RDP

    • GENECONV

    • Bootscan

    • MaxChi

    • Chimaera

    • SiScan

    • 3Seq

  • Validation Criteria: Consider recombination events statistically significant when detected by multiple methods with a p-value threshold (typically p < 10⁻⁵) and an acceptable R score (e.g., ≥ 0.47) .

  • Phylogenetic Analysis: Construct phylogenetic trees using different genomic regions to visualize incongruencies that may indicate recombination. Maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods are typically employed for robust phylogenetic inference.

Recombination analysis is particularly important for viruses, as interspecies recombination has been demonstrated to be a source of viral speciation . For example, in geminiviruses, weeds have been identified as mixing vessels for recombination events that can lead to the emergence of new viruses with altered host ranges or virulence.

What are the current approaches for studying CmYLCV movement protein interactions with host cellular components?

Understanding the interactions between viral movement proteins and host cellular components is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms of viral transport. For CmYLCV movement protein (ORF I), researchers can employ several sophisticated approaches:

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) Screening: This technique can identify potential host protein interactors. The CmYLCV movement protein would be used as bait against a cDNA library from host plants.

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Mass Spectrometry: These methods can verify protein-protein interactions in planta and identify interaction partners from complex cellular extracts.

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): This approach allows visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells, providing spatial information about where these interactions occur.

  • Transmission Electron Microscopy: This technique can be used to visualize viral movement complexes in association with plasmodesmata or other cellular structures.

  • Proteomics Analysis: Differential proteomics comparing healthy and infected plants can identify host proteins with altered expression or modification in response to viral infection.

When studying promoter-based interactions, researchers have found that CmYLCV promoter elements interact with plant transcription factors such as TGA3 and WRKY53 in Arabidopsis, mediating salicylic acid-dependent gene expression . Similar approaches could be applied to study movement protein interactions.

How can infectious clones of CmYLCV be constructed for studying movement protein function?

Construction of infectious clones is essential for studying viral protein functions in their native context. For CmYLCV, the following methodology has proven effective:

  • Viral DNA Isolation: Extract total DNA from infected plant tissue, preferably using samples with high viral titer as confirmed by PCR or quantitative PCR.

  • Genome Amplification: Employ rolling circle amplification (RCA) using phi29 DNA polymerase to amplify the circular viral genome. This technique is particularly effective for pararetrovirus genomes like CmYLCV.

  • Clone Construction Strategy:

    • Digest RCA products with appropriate restriction enzymes that cut once in the viral genome

    • Clone the full-length viral genome into a suitable vector for transformation

    • For specific movement protein studies, create variants with mutations in ORF I using site-directed mutagenesis

  • Transformation and Plant Inoculation:

    • Transform the infectious clone into Agrobacterium tumefaciens

    • Inoculate test plants using agroinfiltration

    • Monitor for symptom development over 3-4 weeks post-inoculation

  • Verification of Infection:

    • Confirm successful infection using PCR, Southern blotting, and symptom evaluation

    • For movement protein studies, employ tissue-specific sampling to track viral movement

Historical data shows that CmYLCV clone has successfully been proven infectious to C. parqui, making this methodology viable for studying the virus and its components in a laboratory setting .

What challenges might arise when expressing CmYLCV movement protein in heterologous systems, and how can they be addressed?

Researchers expressing CmYLCV movement protein in heterologous systems may encounter several challenges:

  • Protein Insolubility: Viral movement proteins often form aggregates when overexpressed.

    • Solution: Optimize expression conditions by lowering temperature (16-20°C), using weaker promoters, or adding solubility-enhancing tags like MBP or SUMO. Consider extracting under denaturing conditions followed by refolding.

  • Post-translational Modifications: Movement proteins may require specific modifications not present in bacterial systems.

    • Solution: Express in eukaryotic systems such as yeast, insect cells, or plant-based expression systems that more closely mimic the native environment.

  • Protein Toxicity: Expression of viral proteins can be toxic to host cells.

    • Solution: Use tightly regulated inducible expression systems and optimize induction parameters to balance protein yield with cellular viability.

  • Functional Assessment: Determining if the recombinant protein retains functionality can be challenging.

    • Solution: Develop in vitro assays for RNA binding or cell-to-cell movement using fluorescently labeled nucleic acids and artificial membranes or protoplast systems.

  • Expression Level Variability: Inconsistent expression levels between experiments.

    • Solution: Consider using the CmYLCV promoter itself, which has been shown to drive high-level constitutive expression in diverse plant species . The promoter activity is comparable to or higher than commonly used promoters in biotechnology.

By addressing these challenges methodically, researchers can enhance the likelihood of successfully expressing and studying functional CmYLCV movement protein.

How can CRISPR-Cas9 technology be applied to study CmYLCV movement protein function in host plants?

CRISPR-Cas9 technology offers powerful approaches for studying viral-host interactions relevant to CmYLCV movement protein:

  • Host Factor Knockout:

    • Design sgRNAs targeting host genes potentially involved in viral movement

    • Generate transgenic plants with mutations in these factors

    • Challenge with CmYLCV and assess the impact on viral movement and symptom development

    • This approach can identify essential host components required for movement protein function

  • Viral Genome Editing:

    • Design CRISPR systems targeting the viral ORF I in infected plants

    • Analyze the resulting viral variants for altered movement capabilities

    • This approach can provide insights into functional domains within the movement protein

  • Tagged Variant Creation:

    • Use CRISPR-mediated homology-directed repair to introduce tags into the endogenous viral genome

    • Track the movement protein in real-time during infection

    • Study protein-protein interactions in the native context

  • Promoter Editing:

    • Modify the ORF I promoter region to alter expression levels

    • Assess the impact of movement protein abundance on infection dynamics

  • Immunity Development:

    • Engineer plant immunity against CmYLCV by designing CRISPR systems targeting conserved regions of ORF I

    • This approach has potential applications in developing virus-resistant crop varieties

When implementing these techniques, researchers should consider the narrow host range of CmYLCV and select appropriate experimental systems. Additionally, off-target effects should be carefully assessed through whole-genome sequencing of edited plants.

What bioinformatics approaches are most valuable for analyzing the evolution and structure of CmYLCV movement protein?

Comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of CmYLCV movement protein requires a multi-faceted approach:

  • Sequence Conservation Analysis:

    • Multiple sequence alignment of movement proteins from CmYLCV isolates and related viruses

    • Identification of conserved motifs and functional domains using tools like MEME and PROSITE

    • Calculation of selection pressures (dN/dS ratios) to identify regions under positive or purifying selection

  • Structural Prediction and Analysis:

    • Secondary structure prediction using algorithms like PSIPRED

    • Tertiary structure modeling using homology modeling or ab initio approaches with tools like I-TASSER or AlphaFold2

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to study protein flexibility and potential interaction surfaces

  • Phylogenetic Analysis:

    • Construction of phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods

    • Reconciliation of gene and species trees to identify potential horizontal gene transfer events

    • Analysis of cophylogenetic patterns between virus and host evolution

  • Recombination Analysis:

    • Implementation of methods similar to those used in identifying novel geminiviruses

    • Detection of potential recombination breakpoints within the movement protein gene

    • Assessment of the impact of recombination on protein function and host range

  • Comparative Genomics:

    • Analysis of genomic context of ORF I in CmYLCV compared to related viruses

    • Investigation of differences in primer-binding site location, which in CmYLCV is located in the intercistronic region following ORF Ib rather than within this ORF

    • Exploration of the implications of the missing ORF VII in CmYLCV

These bioinformatic approaches can provide valuable insights into the evolution and function of the CmYLCV movement protein, guiding experimental design and hypothesis generation.

How does the host range of CmYLCV compare to other plant viruses with similar movement proteins?

CmYLCV displays a notably narrow host range compared to many other plant viruses, which is a distinctive characteristic that influences its research and biotechnological applications:

  • CmYLCV Host Range:

    • Primary natural host: Cestrum parqui

    • Extremely narrow host range compared to other plant pararetroviruses

    • Successfully cloned and proven infectious to C. parqui in laboratory conditions

  • Comparative Analysis with Related Viruses:

    • In contrast to CmYLCV's limited range, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) infects multiple plant families including:

      • Solanaceae (tomato, pepper)

      • Cucurbitaceae (cucumber, squash)

      • Fabaceae (common bean)

      • Chenopodiaceae (Chenopodium quinoa)

  • Movement Protein Contribution to Host Range:

    • The narrow host specificity of CmYLCV may be partially attributed to unique features of its movement protein

    • The absence of ORF VII in CmYLCV could potentially impact its host range, as homologous ORFs in related viruses may have functions affecting host adaptation

  • Experimental Host Range Determination:

    • Standard methodology involves:

      • Inoculation of diverse plant species with viral clones

      • Monitoring for symptom development

      • Confirmation of infection through PCR and serological methods

      • Quantification of viral load in different hosts

The extremely narrow host range of CmYLCV, combined with the strong activity of its promoter in diverse plant species, makes it a particularly valuable tool for transgene expression in biotechnology applications . This unique combination allows for high expression levels while minimizing concerns about potential viral spread beyond intended host species.

What defense mechanisms do plants employ against viral movement proteins, and how might this affect CmYLCV research?

Plants have evolved sophisticated defense mechanisms against viral movement proteins, which researchers studying CmYLCV should consider:

  • RNA Silencing Pathways:

    • Plants utilize RNA interference (RNAi) to target viral RNA for degradation

    • siRNAs derived from viral sequences can lead to sequence-specific silencing

    • For CmYLCV research, consider monitoring small RNA profiles in infected plants to understand silencing responses directed against movement protein transcripts

  • R Gene-Mediated Resistance:

    • Plant R proteins can recognize viral components including movement proteins

    • Recognition triggers hypersensitive response (HR) and programmed cell death

    • When studying CmYLCV movement protein, researchers should assess potential R gene interactions in different host backgrounds

  • Plasmodesmata Regulation:

    • Plants can regulate plasmodesmata permeability in response to infection

    • Callose deposition at plasmodesmata can restrict viral movement

    • Research methodologies should include analysis of plasmodesmatal structure and callose deposition in response to CmYLCV infection

  • Hormone-Mediated Responses:

    • Salicylic acid (SA) pathways are activated during viral infections

    • Studies have shown that Arabidopsis TGA3 and WRKY53 transcription factors interact with the CmYLCV promoter in SA-dependent gene expression

    • Similar interactions may occur in relation to movement protein function or expression

  • Experimental Considerations:

    • Control for plant age and environmental conditions that affect defense responses

    • Consider using defense-compromised mutants to isolate movement protein functionality

    • Compare responses across different host species to identify common and unique defense mechanisms

Understanding these plant defense mechanisms is crucial for designing effective experiments and interpreting results in CmYLCV movement protein research, particularly when expressing recombinant proteins or studying viral movement in planta.

How might CRISPR-based diagnostic tools be developed for detecting CmYLCV in plant samples?

CRISPR-based diagnostic systems offer promising approaches for sensitive and specific detection of CmYLCV in plant samples:

  • CRISPR-Cas12a-based Detection Systems:

    • Design crRNAs targeting conserved regions of CmYLCV ORF I

    • Utilize the trans-cleavage activity of Cas12a on reporter molecules

    • Develop a lateral flow assay for field-deployable diagnostics

    • Expected sensitivity: 10-100 copies of viral DNA per reaction

  • SHERLOCK and DETECTR Platforms:

    • Adapt these platforms for amplification-free detection of CmYLCV

    • Combine with isothermal amplification methods for enhanced sensitivity

    • Potential for multiplexed detection of CmYLCV alongside other plant pathogens

  • On-site Detection Protocol Development:

    • Optimize sample preparation from plant tissue (targeting leaves showing mosaic symptoms)

    • Standardize reaction conditions for consistent results

    • Validate against conventional detection methods (PCR, Southern blotting)

  • Implementation Considerations:

    • Design crRNAs that account for potential genetic diversity in CmYLCV isolates

    • Include internal controls to verify assay performance

    • Establish clear thresholds for positive/negative results

This emerging diagnostic approach offers advantages over traditional methods including speed (results within 30-60 minutes), reduced equipment requirements, and potential for field deployment. Early detection of CmYLCV can facilitate timely implementation of control measures, particularly important for research facilities working with susceptible plant species.

What are the potential applications of CmYLCV movement protein in plant biotechnology beyond understanding viral pathogenesis?

The unique properties of CmYLCV and its movement protein offer several innovative biotechnological applications:

  • Protein Trafficking Enhancement:

    • Fusion of the CmYLCV movement protein with recombinant proteins of interest

    • Facilitation of cell-to-cell transport for improved distribution of therapeutic or industrial proteins in plant biofactories

    • Development of plant-based protein expression systems with enhanced intercellular distribution

  • Targeted Delivery Systems:

    • Engineering the movement protein to selectively transport specific RNA or protein cargoes

    • Development of plant-based drug delivery systems utilizing the movement protein's transport capabilities

    • Creation of tissue-specific delivery mechanisms for agricultural applications

  • Novel Expression Systems:

    • The CmYLCV promoter has already demonstrated strong constitutive expression in diverse plant species

    • Coupling this promoter with modified movement protein elements could create customizable expression systems

    • The extremely narrow host range of CmYLCV provides built-in biosafety for transgenic applications

  • Plant Architecture Modification:

    • Controlled expression of modified movement proteins to influence plasmodesmata function

    • Potential applications in altering plant development, stress responses, or resource allocation

    • Creation of plants with novel source-sink relationships for improved crop productivity

  • Nanotechnology Applications:

    • Utilization of movement protein properties for developing plant-based nanomaterials

    • Design of biomolecular transport systems for delivering nanoparticles within plant tissues

    • Creation of plant-viral hybrid nanostructures for various biotechnological applications

These applications leverage the fundamental properties of the CmYLCV movement protein while extending their utility beyond the context of viral pathogenesis. The combination of the strong CmYLCV promoter with modified movement protein functions could yield particularly valuable tools for plant biotechnology.

What are the most promising future research directions for CmYLCV movement protein studies?

The study of CmYLCV movement protein presents several promising research directions that could significantly advance our understanding of plant-virus interactions and lead to novel applications:

  • Structural Biology Approaches:

    • Determination of the three-dimensional structure of CmYLCV movement protein

    • Structure-function relationship studies to identify critical domains

    • Comparative structural analysis with movement proteins from viruses with broader host ranges

  • Host Factor Identification:

    • Comprehensive screening for host proteins interacting with CmYLCV movement protein

    • Functional validation of these interactions using CRISPR-Cas9 knockout approaches

    • Comparison of interactome profiles between compatible and incompatible hosts

  • Movement Dynamics Visualization:

    • Development of advanced imaging techniques to track movement protein trafficking in real-time

    • Utilization of super-resolution microscopy to visualize plasmodesmata interactions

    • Implementation of correlative light and electron microscopy for detailed structural analysis

  • Synthetic Biology Applications:

    • Engineering of movement protein variants with altered host specificity or transport characteristics

    • Development of movement protein-based molecular tools for plant biotechnology

    • Integration with the already-characterized CmYLCV promoter for novel expression systems

  • Evolutionary Studies:

    • Investigation of recombination events in CmYLCV evolution, similar to studies in other viral systems

    • Comparative genomics across the Caulimoviridae family to understand the evolutionary trajectory of movement proteins

    • Assessment of selective pressures on different domains of the movement protein

These research directions will not only enhance our fundamental understanding of viral movement mechanisms but could also lead to practical applications in plant biotechnology, crop protection, and synthetic biology. The unique properties of CmYLCV, particularly its narrow host range and strong promoter activity , make it an especially valuable model system for such studies.

How might breakthroughs in understanding CmYLCV movement protein contribute to broader plant virology and biotechnology fields?

Advancements in understanding CmYLCV movement protein have the potential to make significant contributions to multiple fields:

  • Fundamental Virology Insights:

    • Elucidation of universal mechanisms underlying viral movement in plants

    • Better understanding of host range determinants and virus-host co-evolution

    • Insights into the role of recombination in viral evolution and adaptation

  • Applied Biotechnology Developments:

    • Novel protein delivery systems for plant genetic engineering

    • Enhanced tools for transgene expression utilizing the CmYLCV promoter's strong constitutive activity across plant species

    • Biosafe expression systems leveraging CmYLCV's extremely narrow host range

  • Crop Protection Strategies:

    • Targeted approaches to disrupt viral movement in economically important crops

    • Development of broad-spectrum resistance strategies against multiple viral pathogens

    • Creation of diagnostic tools for early detection of emerging viral threats

  • Synthetic Biology Platforms:

    • Engineering of artificial cellular communication systems based on movement protein principles

    • Development of programmable intercellular transport mechanisms

    • Creation of novel biomaterials with self-assembling properties

  • Cross-disciplinary Applications:

    • Adaptation of insights from plant viral movement to address challenges in animal virology

    • Application of movement protein principles to drug delivery systems in medical biotechnology

    • Inspiration for biomimetic approaches in materials science and nanotechnology

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.