Recombinant Chicken Arginine and glutamate-rich protein 1 (ARGLU1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is finalized during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ARGLU1; RCJMB04_7p10Arginine and glutamate-rich protein 1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-276
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Gallus gallus (Chicken)
Target Names
ARGLU1
Target Protein Sequence
MGRSRSRSSS RSKHTKSSKH NKKNRSRSRS RSREKERARK RSKSRESKRN RRRESRSRSR SNTAPSSRRD RERERERASS PPDRIDIFGR TVSKRSSLDE KQKREEEEKK AEFERQRKIR QQEIEEKLIE EETARRVEEL VAKRVEEELE KRKDEIEREV LRRVEEAKRI MEKQLLEELE RQRQAELAAQ KAREEEERAK REELERILEE NNRKIAEAQA KLAEEQLKIV EEQRKIHEER MKLEQERQRQ QKEEQKIILG KGKSRPKLSF SLKSQD
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the molecular structure of chicken ARGLU1 and how does it compare to mammalian homologs?

ARGLU1 is a small protein (273 amino acids in humans) characterized by distinct structural domains: an N-terminal positively charged region enriched with arginine residues and a C-terminal negatively charged region enriched with glutamate residues . Computational predictions using AlphaFold suggest the presence of an α-helix at residues 93-255, though this has not been experimentally confirmed .

The protein lacks known structural or functional domains and contains intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) . The high conservation of ARGLU1 across species suggests evolutionary importance, with significant sequence similarity between avian and mammalian versions. Studies have shown that ARGLU1 is particularly conserved in vertebrates, with the intron 2 region containing an Ultraconserved element (UCE) showing 95% sequence conservation for 500 nucleotides between human and chicken .

What are the established functions of ARGLU1 in cellular processes?

ARGLU1 functions primarily in two critical cellular processes:

  • Transcriptional regulation: ARGLU1 serves as a coactivator for nuclear receptors, including estrogen receptor (ER) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) . It interacts directly with the Mediator complex through binding to Mediator subunit 1 (MED1) . Recent evidence indicates that ARGLU1 also enhances promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II, likely by inhibiting the interaction between JMJD6 and BRD4 .

  • RNA splicing modulation: ARGLU1 plays a significant role in alternative splicing events, particularly in neuronal cells responding to glucocorticoid signaling . Studies have shown that ARGLU1 deletion leads to global splicing alterations and neuronal deficiencies .

Interestingly, only about 7.5% of genes differentially alternatively spliced by ARGLU1 are also transcriptionally regulated by the protein, suggesting independent mechanisms for these two functions .

What experimental approaches are commonly used to express and purify recombinant chicken ARGLU1?

Recombinant expression of ARGLU1 typically employs bacterial expression systems using vectors with appropriate tags for purification. Based on established protocols in the literature:

  • Expression systems:

    • E. coli BL21(DE3) strain with pGEX vectors for GST-fusion proteins

    • Eukaryotic expression using HEK293 cells for FLAG-tagged or HA-tagged constructs

  • Purification approaches:

    • Affinity chromatography (GST, His, or FLAG tag-based) followed by size exclusion chromatography

    • For GST-fusion proteins: glutathione-Sepharose beads with appropriate buffer conditions (typically PBS with protease inhibitors)

  • Buffer considerations:

    • Due to the charged nature of ARGLU1 (arginine-rich N-terminus and glutamate-rich C-terminus), buffers should be carefully selected to maintain protein solubility

    • Higher salt concentrations may be necessary to prevent non-specific ionic interactions

What evidence exists for ARGLU1 binding to RNA in experimental settings?

RNA-immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments have demonstrated that ARGLU1 protein can bind to RNA molecules. In particular:

This RNA-binding capacity appears critical for ARGLU1's function in alternative splicing regulation, though the protein lacks conventional RNA-binding domains found in other mammalian RNA-binding proteins .

How does ARGLU1 interact with the Mediator complex to regulate transcription?

ARGLU1 serves as a MED1/Mediator-associated protein that plays a crucial role in the regulation of gene transcription through its interaction with the Mediator complex. Detailed protein-protein interaction studies have revealed:

  • Direct interaction with MED1: ARGLU1 directly interacts with the far C-terminal region of MED1, making it the first reported protein to bind this specific region of MED1 .

  • Domain-specific interactions: Deletion mapping experiments have shown that the N-terminal arginine-rich region of ARGLU1 (amino acids 1-89), not the C-terminal glutamate-rich region, is responsible for pulling down MED1 and other Mediator complex components .

  • Nuclear colocalization: Immunofluorescence studies have confirmed that ARGLU1 colocalizes with MED1 in the nucleus, supporting their functional interaction .

  • Estrogen receptor-mediated gene transcription:

    • ARGLU1 is recruited to estrogen receptor (ER) target gene promoters in a ligand-dependent manner

    • ChIP-reChIP assays have confirmed that ARGLU1 and MED1 colocalize on the same ER target gene promoters upon estrogen induction

    • ARGLU1 is required for the expression of ER target genes

The mechanistic model suggests that ARGLU1 works cooperatively with MED1 to bridge the interaction between nuclear receptors and RNA polymerase II, facilitating transcriptional activation.

What mechanisms underlie ARGLU1's role in alternative splicing regulation?

ARGLU1 employs distinct mechanisms to regulate alternative splicing events, particularly in response to hormonal stimuli:

  • Domain-specific functions: While the C-terminal glutamate-rich domain of ARGLU1 mediates interaction with nuclear receptors for transcriptional coactivation, the N-terminal arginine-rich domain mediates interactions with splicing factors .

  • Hormone-responsive splicing regulation: In neuronal cells, glucocorticoid signaling through dexamethasone treatment significantly changes the alternative splicing landscape in an ARGLU1-dependent manner .

  • ARGLU1 and sisRNA interaction: RNA-immunoprecipitation experiments have demonstrated that ARGLU1 protein binds to Arglu1 sisRNA, suggesting a potential autoregulatory mechanism . This interaction may play a role in mediating broader splicing events.

  • Global splicing effects: Deletion of ARGLU1 leads to global splicing alterations affecting genes involved in:

    • Histone chromatin organization

    • Neurogenesis

    • Other developmental pathways

  • Splicing machinery interaction: ARGLU1 appears to interact with components of the splicing machinery, though specific protein-protein interactions beyond MED1 remain to be fully characterized .

Importantly, the splicing regulatory function of ARGLU1 seems largely independent of its transcriptional regulation function, as only a small percentage (7.5%) of genes show both differential alternative splicing and transcriptional regulation by ARGLU1 .

How can researchers investigate ARGLU1's role in promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II?

To investigate ARGLU1's role in promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II, researchers can employ the following methodological approaches:

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays:

    • Perform ChIP for RNA Polymerase II with antibodies specific to different phosphorylation states of the C-terminal domain (CTD)

    • Calculate pausing index (ratio of Pol II at promoter vs gene body) with and without ARGLU1 modulation

    • ChIP-seq analysis to identify genome-wide Pol II distribution patterns

  • Nascent RNA analysis:

    • Global Run-On sequencing (GRO-seq) or Precision Run-On sequencing (PRO-seq) to measure nascent transcription

    • Comparison of nascent transcription at promoter-proximal regions vs gene bodies

  • Protein-protein interaction studies:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation of ARGLU1 with JMJD6 and BRD4 to confirm interaction dynamics

    • In vitro competition assays to verify if ARGLU1 disrupts JMJD6-BRD4 interaction

    • Proximity ligation assays (PLA) to visualize interactions in situ

  • Functional genomics approaches:

    • ARGLU1 knockdown/overexpression followed by RNA-seq and ChIP-seq

    • Analysis of pause-release factors (P-TEFb, BRD4, JMJD6) recruitment in ARGLU1-depleted cells

Recent evidence suggests that ARGLU1 promotes promoter-proximal pausing by inhibiting the interaction between JMJD6 and BRD4, but the detailed molecular mechanisms require further investigation using these approaches .

What is the relationship between ARGLU1 and the DNA damage response pathway?

ARGLU1 has recently been implicated in DNA damage response pathways and chemoresistance in cancer cells:

  • Enhanced DNA damage repair:

    • ARGLU1 overexpression promotes DNA damage repair in cancer cells

    • This effect may be mediated through enhancement of RNA polymerase II promoter-proximal pausing

  • Chemoresistance:

    • Cancer cells overexpressing ARGLU1 show increased resistance to genotoxic drugs

    • ARGLU1 enhances cancer cell survival when exposed to DNA-damaging agents

  • Growth regulation:

    • ARGLU1 overexpression increases cancer cell growth rate

    • Knockdown of ARGLU1 leads to growth arrest

    • Depletion of ARGLU1 significantly impairs growth and colony formation (both anchorage-dependent and -independent) of breast cancer cells

  • Link to viral oncoproteins:

    • ARGLU1 binds to adenovirus Early protein 1A (E1A)

    • ARGLU1 expression is elevated by Epstein-Barr virus EBNALP protein in EBV-associated lymphoma cells

The relationship between ARGLU1's role in transcriptional regulation and its function in DNA damage repair suggests a potential connection between these processes, where ARGLU1 may regulate the expression of genes involved in DNA repair pathways or directly participate in the DNA damage response.

What experimental approaches are optimal for studying ARGLU1 protein-protein interactions?

To effectively study ARGLU1 protein-protein interactions, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Standard approach using tagged versions of ARGLU1 (FLAG, HA) and potential binding partners

    • As demonstrated in previous studies, Co-IP with total cell extracts from HEK293 cells transiently transfected with tagged versions of proteins (e.g., HA-tagged GR and FLAG-tagged ARGLU1)

    • Reverse Co-IP to confirm specificity of interactions

  • GST pulldown assays:

    • GST-fused ARGLU1 (full-length or domains) expressed and purified from bacteria

    • Pulldown experiments using nuclear extracts or recombinant proteins of interest

    • Particularly useful for domain mapping studies, as demonstrated for MED1 interaction

  • Deletion and mutational analysis:

    • Generate truncation mutants (e.g., ARGLU1 N-term and C-term constructs) to map interaction domains

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues identified through computational analysis

    • Functional validation using reporter assays (e.g., GAL4-GR/UAS-luciferase system)

  • In situ visualization approaches:

    • Immunofluorescence coupled with proximity ligation assay (PLA)

    • Single-molecule FISH combined with immunofluorescence for studying RNA-protein interactions

    • As demonstrated in studies showing colocalization of ARGLU1 with sisRNA and pre-mRNA

  • Mass spectrometry-based approaches:

    • Affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP-MS)

    • Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) for capturing transient interactions

    • Intact protein complex analysis by native mass spectrometry

The choice of method should be dictated by the specific question being addressed about ARGLU1 interactions.

How can researchers effectively design experimental controls when studying recombinant chicken ARGLU1?

When studying recombinant chicken ARGLU1, robust experimental design should include the following controls:

  • Expression controls:

    • Empty vector controls processed in parallel with ARGLU1-expressing constructs

    • Expression of an unrelated protein of similar size and biochemical properties (e.g., MAZ, a nuclear protein used as negative control in interaction studies)

    • Western blotting to confirm equal protein expression levels of wild-type and mutant ARGLU1 constructs

  • Functional assay controls:

    • For transcriptional assays: reporter assays with and without ligand stimulation to assess ligand-dependency

    • Dose-response experiments to establish specificity

    • Co-expression with known coactivators (e.g., SRC1, TIF2, PGC1α) to test additivity or synergy

  • Interaction study controls:

    • No antibody controls in immunoprecipitation experiments

    • IgG controls for non-specific binding

    • Competitive binding assays with unlabeled proteins

    • Reverse pull-down experiments to confirm specificity of interactions

  • RNA-binding experiments:

    • RNase treatment controls to confirm RNA-dependency of interactions

    • Use of non-target RNA controls

    • Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) knockdown of specific RNAs to test binding specificity

  • Knockdown/knockout controls:

    • Non-targeting siRNA/shRNA controls

    • Rescue experiments using RNAi-resistant constructs

    • Time-course experiments to distinguish direct from indirect effects

These controls help establish specificity, rule out artifacts, and ensure reproducibility in ARGLU1 research.

What are the technical challenges in purifying functional recombinant chicken ARGLU1?

Purification of functional recombinant chicken ARGLU1 presents several technical challenges that researchers should address:

  • Protein solubility issues:

    • The highly charged nature of ARGLU1 (arginine-rich N-terminus, glutamate-rich C-terminus) can lead to aggregation or precipitation

    • Solution: Optimize buffer conditions with varying salt concentrations and pH; consider addition of solubility-enhancing tags (e.g., MBP, SUMO)

  • Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs):

    • ARGLU1 contains intrinsically disordered regions that can complicate expression and purification

    • Solution: Expression at lower temperatures (15-18°C), use of specialized E. coli strains designed for IDR-containing proteins

  • Post-translational modifications:

    • Bacterial expression systems lack eukaryotic post-translational modifications that may be essential for function

    • Solution: Consider eukaryotic expression systems (insect cells, mammalian cells) for studies requiring authentic modifications

  • RNA contamination:

    • Given ARGLU1's RNA-binding properties, co-purification with bacterial RNA is possible

    • Solution: Include high-salt washes and/or RNase treatment during purification, monitor A260/A280 ratio

  • Functional validation:

    • Confirming that purified recombinant ARGLU1 retains its functional properties

    • Solution: Develop in vitro functional assays (RNA binding assays, protein interaction assays) to validate activity

Table 1: Optimization strategies for recombinant chicken ARGLU1 purification

ChallengeOptimization StrategyRationale
Protein solubilityTest buffers with 150-500 mM NaCl; Add 5-10% glycerolHigh salt reduces ionic interactions; glycerol stabilizes proteins
AggregationExpress at 16-18°C; Add detergents (0.05-0.1% Tween-20)Lower temperature reduces aggregation; mild detergents prevent hydrophobic interactions
RNA contaminationInclude 1 M NaCl wash step; RNase A treatmentHigh salt disrupts protein-RNA interactions; RNase digests contaminating RNA
Proteolytic degradationAdd protease inhibitor cocktail; Include 1-5 mM EDTAInhibits proteases; EDTA chelates metal ions needed by metalloproteases
Yield optimizationCodon optimization for E. coli; Test multiple fusion tagsImproves translation efficiency; different tags offer varying solubility profiles

How can researchers assess the functional consequences of ARGLU1 mutations in experimental systems?

To assess the functional consequences of ARGLU1 mutations, researchers can employ several complementary approaches:

  • Structure-function analysis:

    • Generate targeted mutations in key domains (N-terminal arginine-rich region vs. C-terminal glutamate-rich region)

    • Create chimeric proteins by swapping domains with unrelated proteins

    • Test functional complementation using ARGLU1 knockout systems

  • Transcriptional activity assays:

    • Reporter gene assays using hormone-responsive elements (e.g., GAL4-GR/UAS-luciferase system)

    • Test additive effects with other coactivators (SRC1, TIF2, PGC1α)

    • Measure effects on endogenous target gene expression by RT-qPCR

  • Protein-protein interaction studies:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation assays with wild-type vs. mutant ARGLU1

    • Quantitative measurement of binding affinities using biophysical methods (SPR, ITC)

    • Test interactions with known partners (MED1, nuclear receptors, splicing factors)

  • Splicing regulation assessment:

    • Minigene splicing assays to measure effects on alternative splicing

    • RNA-seq to assess global splicing pattern changes

    • RT-PCR analysis of specific splice variants in ARGLU1-mutant expressing cells

  • Cellular phenotype analysis:

    • Proliferation assays in cancer cell lines

    • Colony formation assays (both anchorage-dependent and -independent)

    • Cell cycle analysis and apoptosis measurements

    • Genotoxic drug sensitivity testing

Successful examples from the literature include deletion mapping experiments that identified the C-terminal domain of ARGLU1 as responsible for GR coactivation, while the N-terminal domain was found to interact with MED1 and mediate RNA binding .

What high-throughput approaches can be used to study ARGLU1-dependent gene regulation networks?

Several high-throughput approaches are valuable for investigating ARGLU1-dependent gene regulation networks:

  • Transcriptome analysis:

    • RNA-seq following ARGLU1 knockdown/overexpression to identify differentially expressed genes

    • RNA-seq with and without hormone treatment to identify ARGLU1-dependent hormone-responsive genes

    • Differential alternative splicing analysis to distinguish transcriptional from splicing effects

  • Chromatin occupancy studies:

    • ChIP-seq for ARGLU1 to identify direct genomic binding sites

    • ChIP-seq for RNA Polymerase II to assess effects on promoter-proximal pausing

    • ChIP-seq for histone modifications to evaluate effects on chromatin state

  • Protein-protein interaction networks:

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS)

    • BioID or APEX proximity labeling to identify the ARGLU1 interactome

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening for novel interaction partners

  • Functional genomics approaches:

    • CRISPR-Cas9 screening with ARGLU1-dependent reporters

    • Synthetic genetic interaction mapping to identify genetic dependencies

    • Combinatorial siRNA/shRNA screening with ARGLU1 and interacting partners

  • Integrative data analysis:

    • Integration of transcriptome, chromatin, and interactome data

    • Network analysis to identify key nodes and regulatory hubs

    • Pathway enrichment analysis to identify biological processes affected by ARGLU1

Table 2: Key findings from high-throughput studies of ARGLU1 function

ApproachKey FindingsReference
RNA-seqGlucocorticoid signaling significantly changes alternative splicing landscape in an ARGLU1-dependent manner
Deletion analysisOnly 7.5% of genes differentially alternatively spliced by ARGLU1 were also transcriptionally regulated by ARGLU1
Functional pathway analysisARGLU1 regulates genes involved in histone chromatin organization and neurogenesis
Co-IP combined with reporter assaysARGLU1 shows additivity with other coactivators (SRC1, TIF2, PGC1α) suggesting multi-protein complex formation
ChIP-reChIPARGLU1 and MED1 colocalize on estrogen receptor target gene promoters upon estrogen induction

These approaches provide complementary insights into ARGLU1 function, from direct molecular interactions to genome-wide regulatory effects.

What methods can be used to compare ARGLU1 binding partners across different species?

To compare ARGLU1 binding partners across different species (such as chicken vs. mammalian), researchers can employ several complementary methodologies:

  • Comparative interactome analysis:

    • Perform immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) using species-specific ARGLU1 antibodies or tagged recombinant proteins

    • Compare resulting interaction networks to identify conserved and species-specific interactors

    • Quantitative proteomics approaches (SILAC, TMT) can provide relative binding affinities

  • Cross-species protein-protein interaction validation:

    • Express recombinant chicken ARGLU1 in mammalian cells and vice versa

    • Perform Co-IP experiments to test interaction with known partners (e.g., MED1, nuclear receptors)

    • Use purified recombinant proteins from different species for in vitro binding assays

  • Domain conservation analysis:

    • Generate chimeric proteins combining domains from chicken and mammalian ARGLU1

    • Test functional complementation and interaction capabilities

    • Identify critical residues required for protein-protein interactions across species

  • Bioinformatic prediction and validation:

    • Use computational approaches to predict conserved interaction motifs

    • Perform molecular docking simulations with potential binding partners

    • Validate predictions experimentally using targeted mutations

  • Evolutionary analysis of binding interfaces:

    • Compare sequences at protein-protein interaction interfaces across species

    • Identify sites under positive or negative selection

    • Correlate evolutionary conservation with functional importance in binding

These approaches can reveal evolutionary conserved core interactions that are likely fundamental to ARGLU1 function, as well as species-specific interactions that may reflect adaptation to different cellular contexts or regulatory requirements.

How can recombinant chicken ARGLU1 be utilized to study hormone-dependent gene regulation?

Recombinant chicken ARGLU1 can serve as a valuable tool for studying hormone-dependent gene regulation through several experimental approaches:

  • Comparative receptor coactivation studies:

    • Use reporter gene assays with various nuclear receptors (ER, GR, others) and recombinant chicken ARGLU1

    • Compare coactivation potency with mammalian ARGLU1 to identify species-specific differences

    • Test ligand specificity and dose-response relationships specific to avian receptor systems

  • Reconstituted transcription systems:

    • Develop in vitro transcription assays using purified components including recombinant chicken ARGLU1

    • Add chicken nuclear receptor proteins and hormone ligands to assess direct effects on transcription

    • Compare with mammalian components to identify mechanistic differences

  • Structural studies of protein-protein interactions:

    • Perform crystallography or cryo-EM studies of chicken ARGLU1 in complex with MED1 fragments

    • Map interaction surfaces with nuclear receptors and comparison with mammalian counterparts

    • Use structural information to design mutations that specifically disrupt certain interactions

  • Chromatin binding and remodeling:

    • ChIP experiments in avian cell lines with and without recombinant ARGLU1 expression

    • Assess recruitment to hormone-responsive elements and effects on chromatin accessibility

    • Compare binding profiles with mammalian systems to identify conserved and divergent target genes

  • Splicing regulation in hormone-responsive genes:

    • Analyze effects of recombinant chicken ARGLU1 on alternative splicing of hormone-responsive genes

    • Develop minigene splicing assays specific to avian splicing mechanisms

    • Compare glucocorticoid-responsive splicing events between avian and mammalian systems

The research findings to date indicate that ARGLU1 shows ligand-dependent recruitment to hormone receptor target genes, with differential effects on various nuclear receptors. Among the receptors showing ligand dependence for ARGLU1, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) demonstrates the highest dependency, followed by estrogen receptor α (ERα) .

What insights can ARGLU1 research provide for cancer biology and therapeutic development?

Research on ARGLU1 has revealed several significant implications for cancer biology and potential therapeutic development:

  • Cancer cell growth and survival:

    • ARGLU1 overexpression increases cancer cell growth rate

    • Depletion of ARGLU1 significantly impairs growth and colony formation (both anchorage-dependent and -independent) of breast cancer cells

    • These findings suggest ARGLU1 as a potential therapeutic target in certain cancers

  • Chemoresistance mechanisms:

    • Cancer cells overexpressing ARGLU1 show increased resistance to genotoxic drugs

    • ARGLU1 promotes DNA damage repair, potentially explaining this chemoresistance

    • Inhibiting ARGLU1 might sensitize resistant tumors to conventional chemotherapies

  • Hormone-dependent cancer regulation:

    • ARGLU1 is required for estrogen-dependent gene transcription and breast cancer cell growth

    • It interacts with ER and GR to regulate hormone-responsive genes

    • This suggests potential relevance in hormone-dependent cancers (breast, prostate)

  • Transcriptional and splicing regulation in cancer:

    • ARGLU1's dual role in transcription and splicing may contribute to cancer-specific gene expression profiles

    • Targeting either of these functions could provide novel therapeutic approaches

    • Understanding ARGLU1-dependent splicing events may identify cancer-specific isoforms

  • Connection to viral oncogenesis:

    • ARGLU1 binds to viral oncoproteins including adenovirus Early protein 1A (E1A)

    • ARGLU1 expression is elevated by Epstein-Barr virus EBNALP protein in EBV-associated lymphoma cells

    • This suggests potential roles in virus-associated malignancies

Table 3: ARGLU1-targeted therapeutic strategies based on current research

Therapeutic ApproachMechanismPotential ApplicationsResearch Stage
ARGLU1 knockdown/inhibitionReduce cancer cell growth and survivalBreast cancer, potentially other hormone-dependent cancersPreclinical
Disruption of ARGLU1-MED1 interactionBlock estrogen/glucocorticoid-dependent gene activationHormone-receptor positive cancersTarget validation
Targeting ARGLU1's role in DNA damage repairEnhance sensitivity to genotoxic drugsChemoresistant tumorsDiscovery
Modulation of ARGLU1-dependent splicingCorrect cancer-specific splicing eventsCancers with splicing dysregulationTarget identification
Combination with hormone therapiesEnhanced efficacy of hormone receptor antagonistsBreast cancer, prostate cancerHypothetical

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.