Recombinant Chicken DNA polymerase epsilon subunit 2 (POLE2), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms maintain stability for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is finalized during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its implementation.
Synonyms
POLE2; RCJMB04_9k18; DNA polymerase epsilon subunit 2; DNA polymerase II subunit 2; DNA polymerase epsilon subunit B
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Gallus gallus (Chicken)
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Accessory component of the DNA polymerase epsilon complex. It plays a role in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication.
Database Links
Protein Families
DNA polymerase epsilon subunit B family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is the function of DNA polymerase epsilon subunit 2 (POLE2)?

POLE2 is a B subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon involved in regulating DNA replication. Located on chromosome 14q21-q22 in humans, it serves primarily as a non-catalytic component that tethers the catalytic POLE subunit to replication forks . Recent research has identified POLE2 as a general NPF-motif receptor that can interact with various proteins containing the Asn-Pro-Phe (NPF) motif, including those involved in replication, DNA repair, and transcription regulation . This dual functionality positions POLE2 as a potential hub linking DNA replication with other nuclear processes.

What experimental methods are commonly used to analyze POLE2 expression?

Multiple complementary techniques are employed to comprehensively analyze POLE2 expression:

  • RNA Extraction and Quantification: Total RNA is extracted using TRIzol reagent and reverse transcribed using an mRNA reverse transcription kit. Specific primers for POLE2 are used for RT-qPCR, with relative expression quantified using the 2-ΔΔCt method .

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Standard immunoperoxidase staining procedures with anti-POLE2 antibodies (such as Proteintech 21146-1-AP at 1:400 dilution) are used to detect protein expression in tissue samples . Scoring systems typically evaluate:

Score ComponentCriteriaPoints
Staining IntensityNo staining0
Weak staining1
Moderate staining2
Strong staining3
Percentage of Stained Cells≤0%0
1-24%1
25-49%2
50-74%3
≥75%4
Final Score InterpretationScore <4Low POLE2 expression
Score ≥4High POLE2 expression
  • Western Blot Analysis: Used to confirm protein expression levels and validate knockdown efficiency in functional studies .

How can POLE2 be experimentally knocked down for functional studies?

POLE2 knockdown for functional studies typically employs RNA interference approaches:

  • Design of targeting sequences: Specific shRNAs targeting the POLE2 gene are designed and validated for knockdown efficiency.

  • Delivery methods: Lentiviral vectors are commonly used to deliver shPOLE2 constructs into target cells, enabling stable knockdown .

  • Validation of knockdown: Efficiency is confirmed through qPCR for mRNA levels and Western blot for protein expression.

  • Functional assays following knockdown:

    • Cell proliferation assessment using CCK-8 assay

    • Migration ability evaluation through wound healing and trans-well assays

    • Apoptosis rate measurement via flow cytometry

    • Protein expression analysis using techniques like Human Apoptosis Antibody Array

This knockdown approach has been essential in establishing POLE2's role in various cellular processes, particularly in cancer progression models.

What is the relationship between POLE2 and cancer progression?

POLE2 has emerged as a significant factor in multiple cancer types, with consistent evidence of oncogenic properties:

Cancer TypeEffect of POLE2 KnockdownMolecular Mechanisms
Osteosarcoma (OS)- Inhibited proliferation
- Reduced migration
- Increased apoptosis
- Reduced CD44 expression
- Increased Caspase 3, Caspase 8, and p53
- Decreased IGF-II
Bladder Cancer (BLCA)- Inhibited clone formation
- Reduced proliferation
- Decreased invasion and migration
- Increased cisplatin sensitivity
- Identified as a key prognostic essential gene (PEG)
- Associated with molecular subtypes and chemotherapy response
Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)- Inhibited proliferation
- Reduced migration
- Facilitated apoptosis
- Attenuated tumorigenesis
- Upregulated Bad and p21
- Downregulated HSP70, IGF-I, IGF-II, survivin, and sTNF-R1
- Inhibited p-Akt, CCND1, MAPK9, and PIK3CA

In osteosarcoma specifically, POLE2 has been shown to reduce the ubiquitination degradation of CD44 by acting on MDM2 . The overexpression of POLE2 in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues has been consistently observed across various cancer types, and higher expression levels correlate with poorer patient prognosis . These findings collectively establish POLE2 as both a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in cancer.

How does POLE2 function as an NPF motif receptor, and what are its binding partners?

Recent research has revealed POLE2's unexpected role as a general NPF-motif receptor, expanding our understanding of its biological functions:

  • Binding mechanism: POLE2 selectively binds diverse NPF-containing peptides through a shallow pocket near its C-terminus. Key residues involved in NPF coordination include Y513, E520, and S522, as confirmed by AlphaFold predictions .

  • Binding affinities: Fluorescence polarization assays with recombinant His6-avi-MBP-tagged POLE2 and fluorescein-labeled NPF-containing peptides show binding with micromolar affinities (approximately 16 μM for DONSON_71-88 peptide) .

  • NPF-containing binding partners:

ProteinFunctionInteraction MechanismBiological Significance
WDHD1DNA replicationNPF motif binding to POLE2Links replication processes
DONSONReplication stress responseNPF motif binding to POLE2Coordinates replication stress management
TTF2Transcription termination factorNPF motif binding to POLE2Connects replication with transcription regulation
SYNJ1Phosphoinositide phosphataseNPF motif binding to POLE2Demonstrates versatility of POLE2 as an NPF receptor

These findings establish POLE2 as a central hub in a complex interaction network, linking DNA replication with other nuclear processes through NPF motif recognition .

What methodological approaches are used to study POLE2-NPF motif interactions?

Several complementary approaches have been developed to characterize POLE2-NPF motif interactions:

  • Native holdup (nHU) assay: This quantitative approach measures the depletion of proteins from cell extracts when exposed to immobilized peptide baits containing NPF motifs. The technique has successfully identified POLE2 as a binding partner of various NPF-containing peptides .

  • Fluorescence polarization assays: Used with recombinant POLE2 (His6-avi-MBP-tagged) and fluorescein-labeled NPF-containing peptides to determine binding affinities. This approach has demonstrated direct interaction between POLE2 and NPF motifs with dissociation constants in the micromolar range .

  • Proteome-scale affinity screens: These have identified NPF-containing nuclear proteins that bind POLE2, with mutations in their NPF motifs abolishing binding in cell extracts .

  • Western blot validation: Targeted analyses to confirm interactions between NPF motifs and cellular POLE2 .

  • Mutational analysis: Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues in both POLE2 and NPF-containing peptides to determine specificity determinants and binding mechanisms .

This multi-faceted experimental approach has been crucial in establishing POLE2's role as an NPF motif receptor and characterizing its interaction network.

How can POLE2 mutations impact protein function and potential therapeutic targeting?

POLE mutations can significantly alter protein function and therapeutic interactions:

  • Structural impact: Mutations in POLE can affect tertiary structure stability, as evidenced by molecular dynamic simulation studies showing varying root mean square deviation (RMSD) values between wildtype (stable at 0.31 nm/3.1 Å) and mutant variants (stable at 0.22 to 0.39 nm/2.2 to 3.9 Å) .

  • Binding affinity alterations: In silico analyses have shown that POLE mutants can have favorable binding affinities compared to wild-type counterparts. For example, the P286R variant demonstrates altered binding characteristics with therapeutic compounds like cladribine .

  • Methodological approaches to assess mutation impact:

    • Molecular docking using platforms like Schrödinger's SiteMap module to identify favorable binding regions

    • Molecular dynamic simulations to assess structural stability

    • Sequence conservation analysis to evaluate evolutionary importance of mutated residues

    • Secondary structure prediction to determine structural changes

These findings have significant implications for potential therapeutic targeting of POLE/POLE2, suggesting that mutation status might influence drug efficacy and binding characteristics.

What are the methods for analyzing POLE2's role in cancer stemness and cancer progression?

Advanced methodologies for investigating POLE2's role in cancer stemness include:

  • RNA stemness score (RNAss): Based on mRNA expression, this score evaluates cancer stemness characteristics. Correlation between POLE2 expression and RNAss using Spearman rank-based testing provides insights into POLE2's impact on stem-cell-like phenotypes of cancer cells .

  • In vivo tumor models: Xenograft models with POLE2-modified cancer cells assess tumor growth and response to therapies under physiological conditions. These models have confirmed that POLE2 knockdown attenuates tumorigenesis in various cancer types .

  • Bioinformatic analysis pipeline:

    • RNA-seq data analysis from TCGA and GEO databases

    • Identification of differentially expressed genes using tools like GSE14359 chip

    • Construction and validation of prognostic gene signatures

    • Correlation of gene expression with clinical outcomes

  • Integration with molecular subtyping: POLE2 expression has been correlated with previously defined molecular subtypes in cancers like bladder cancer, suggesting its utility in predicting subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes .

These methodological approaches have established POLE2 as a significant factor in cancer progression and potential therapeutic target across multiple cancer types.

What experimental approaches are used to produce recombinant POLE2 for biochemical studies?

Production of functional recombinant POLE2 for biochemical studies requires specialized techniques:

  • Expression system selection: While the search results don't specifically detail chicken POLE2 expression, recombinant POLE2 has been successfully produced with a His6-avi-MBP tag for biochemical studies . Expression systems typically include:

    • Bacterial systems (E. coli BL21 or Rosetta strains)

    • Insect cell systems (Sf9 or Hi5 cells) for eukaryotic post-translational modifications

  • Protein purification strategies:

    • Affinity chromatography using the His6 tag for initial capture

    • Additional purification steps like ion exchange or size exclusion chromatography

  • Functional validation:

    • Fluorescence polarization assays to confirm NPF-binding activity

    • Competitive binding assays to characterize binding specificity

  • Storage considerations:

    • Buffer optimization to maintain protein stability

    • Flash freezing in single-use aliquots to preserve activity

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.