GGNBP2 proteins generally have a unique structure that includes an N-terminal domain with a previously undescribed fold, known as the Sausage Roll Domain (SRD), and a disordered C-terminal domain . The SRD is crucial for interacting with gametogenetin, while the C-terminal domain is involved in binding to the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex .
In humans, GGNBP2 is involved in spermatogenesis and may function as a corepressor to inhibit estrogen receptor alpha's transcriptional activity, potentially affecting tumorigenic potential in breast tissue . In Drosophila, GGNBP2 plays a role in motor neuron synaptic development and autophagy, processes relevant to neurodegenerative diseases like ALS .
| Tissue/Condition | Expression Level | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Human Testis | High | |
| Glioblastoma | Upregulated | |
| Drosophila Motor Neurons | Essential for synaptic development |
| Function | Organism/Context | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Spermatogenesis | Human | |
| Corepressor for ERα | Human | |
| Synaptic Development | Drosophila | |
| Autophagy Regulation | Drosophila |
May be involved in spermatogenesis.
KEGG: gga:425053
UniGene: Gga.19170
RT-PCR remains the gold standard for initial detection of GGNBP2 transcripts in chicken tissues. Design primers specific to the open reading frame (ORF) of chicken GGNBP2, targeting conserved regions identified through sequence alignment with other vertebrate orthologs. For optimal results, extract RNA from multiple tissue types (including reproductive tissues, lens, cornea, and retina) to establish expression patterns. After amplification, clone and sequence the products to verify transcript identity and detect any splice variants . Normalized quantitative RT-PCR against housekeeping genes like GAPDH can provide relative expression levels across different tissues . For validation, submit experimentally verified cDNA sequences to GenBank to establish reference sequences for the research community.
For optimal extraction of native chicken GGNBP2:
Fresh tissue homogenization should be performed in buffer containing protease inhibitors (PMSF 1mM, leupeptin 10μg/ml, aprotinin 10μg/ml) and phosphatase inhibitors.
Include reducing agents (5-10mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to maintain protein stability.
For membrane-associated proteins like GGNBP2, incorporate non-ionic detergents (0.5-1% Triton X-100).
Centrifugation parameters significantly impact recovery: use 15,000g for 15 minutes at 4°C for initial clarification.
For enrichment, consider subcellular fractionation techniques before western blot analysis.
For western blot detection, develop peptide antibodies targeting unique, potentially antigenic regions of chicken GGNBP2, as demonstrated for γ-crystallins in chicken lens research . Test antibody specificity against recombinant protein controls before application to tissue samples.
A multi-analytical approach provides the most comprehensive characterization:
Shotgun mass spectrometry of tryptic digests can confirm protein identity and post-translational modifications. This approach successfully identified eleven tryptic peptides for chicken γS-crystallin, confirming transcript translation in vivo .
Sequence analysis tools should be employed to identify:
Conserved domains through multiple sequence alignment
Prediction of secondary structure elements
Post-translational modification sites
Subcellular localization signals
Sedimentation analysis and size-exclusion chromatography can determine oligomerization states under physiological conditions.
Circular dichroism spectroscopy provides information about secondary structure composition and thermal stability.
The pET expression system in E. coli has proven effective for chicken protein expression, as demonstrated with γ-crystallins . For GGNBP2 expression:
Clone the ORF of chicken GGNBP2 into a pET vector (pET-28a or pET-32a) containing a His-tag for purification.
Transform into expression hosts like BL21(DE3) or Rosetta(DE3) - the latter provides additional tRNAs for rare codons prevalent in chicken genes.
Optimize expression conditions systematically:
Test multiple induction temperatures (16°C, 25°C, 37°C)
Vary IPTG concentrations (0.1-1.0 mM)
Adjust induction duration (4-24 hours)
Expression challenges are common, as observed with chicken γN-crystallin, which failed to express despite numerous optimization attempts . If bacterial expression proves challenging, alternative systems should be considered:
Baculovirus expression in insect cells (Sf9 or High Five)
Mammalian expression in HEK293 or CHO cells
Cell-free protein expression systems
Based on experiences with other recombinant chicken proteins, several strategies can enhance GGNBP2 solubility:
Expression temperature reduction to 16-18°C significantly increases soluble protein yield for many difficult proteins.
Co-expression with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) can assist proper folding.
Fusion tags that enhance solubility:
MBP (maltose-binding protein)
SUMO
Thioredoxin
GST (glutathione S-transferase)
Buffer optimization during purification:
Include 5-10% glycerol as a stabilizing agent
Test multiple salt concentrations (150-500 mM NaCl)
Evaluate pH ranges (pH 6.5-8.5)
Add non-detergent sulfobetaines (NDSB-201)
Successful expression should aim for protein concentrations of 40mg/ml while maintaining solubility, as achieved with chicken γS-crystallin variants .
A multi-step purification approach typically yields the highest purity for functional studies:
Initial capture using affinity chromatography:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins
Glutathione affinity for GST-tagged proteins
Intermediate purification:
Ion exchange chromatography (cation or anion exchange depending on theoretical pI)
Hydrophobic interaction chromatography
Polishing step:
Size exclusion chromatography to separate oligomeric states and remove aggregates
| Purification Step | Resin/Method | Buffer Composition | Expected Purity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capture | Ni-NTA | 50mM Tris pH 8.0, 300mM NaCl, 10-250mM imidazole | 75-85% |
| Intermediate | Q or SP Sepharose | 20mM Tris pH 8.0, 0-1M NaCl gradient | 85-95% |
| Polishing | Superdex 75/200 | 20mM Tris pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl | >98% |
Verify protein identity using mass spectrometry of tryptic peptides, as demonstrated for chicken lens proteins . Document all purification steps with SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis.
Multiple complementary approaches should be employed to establish biological functions:
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Proximity labeling (BioID or APEX)
Pull-down assays with recombinant protein as bait
Subcellular localization:
Immunofluorescence with peptide-specific antibodies
Expression of GFP-fusion proteins in chicken cell lines (DF1 cells)
Subcellular fractionation followed by western blotting
Functional reporter assays:
RNA binding assessment (if relevant):
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA)
CLIP-seq for genome-wide binding profile
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in chicken cells requires specific optimization:
Design multiple sgRNAs targeting:
Catalytic or functional domains of GGNBP2
Regions conserved across species
Exons present in all splicing variants
For primary chicken cell modification:
For validation of genomic modifications:
For chicken primordial germ cell (PGC) modification (to generate knockout chickens):
For germline transmission assessment:
For comprehensive developmental expression analysis:
Tissue collection strategy:
Sample tissues at multiple embryonic stages (E5, E8, E12, E15, E18)
Include post-hatch timepoints (day 1, day 7, day 21, adult)
Preserve matched samples for both protein and RNA extraction
RNA analysis:
Quantitative RT-PCR using reference genes appropriate for developmental studies (GAPDH, β-actin)
RNAseq for global expression changes
Validate with in situ hybridization for spatial expression patterns
Protein analysis:
Western blot with quantification against loading controls
Immunohistochemistry for tissue localization
Targeted proteomics using selected reaction monitoring (SRM)
Statistical analysis:
To investigate immune pathway involvement:
Overexpression and knockdown studies:
Viral challenge experiments:
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Test interactions with key immune signaling components (chMDA5-N, chMAVS, chTBK1, chIKKε, chIRF7)
Perform co-immunoprecipitation to confirm physical associations
Use deletion mutants to map interaction domains
Gene expression analysis following immune stimulation:
Treat cells with poly(I:C), LPS, or viral infection
Measure GGNBP2 expression changes over time (2h, 6h, 12h, 24h post-treatment)
Correlate with expression of known immune response genes
For evolutionary function conservation analysis:
Sequence analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment of GGNBP2 from various species (chicken, mouse, human, zebrafish)
Identify conserved domains and motifs
Calculate selection pressure (dN/dS ratios) across protein regions
Heterologous expression:
Express chicken GGNBP2 in mammalian cells and vice versa
Test functional complementation in knockout cell lines
Compare subcellular localization patterns
Cross-species protein interaction studies:
Test if chicken GGNBP2 can interact with mammalian binding partners
Identify conserved vs. species-specific interaction networks
Map interaction domains through deletion constructs
Comparative tissue expression profiling:
Compare expression patterns across homologous tissues in different species
Identify conserved regulatory elements in promoter regions
Analyze epigenetic modifications at GGNBP2 loci across species
For optimal PTM characterization:
Sample preparation strategies:
Enrich for specific modifications using antibodies (phospho-specific, ubiquitin-specific)
Use titanium dioxide for phosphopeptide enrichment
Employ IMAC (immobilized metal affinity chromatography) for phosphopeptide purification
MS methodology:
Employ multiple proteolytic enzymes (trypsin, chymotrypsin, Glu-C) to increase sequence coverage
Use electron transfer dissociation (ETD) or electron capture dissociation (ECD) for labile modifications
Implement parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for targeted PTM analysis
Data analysis pipeline:
Search against chicken proteome databases with variable modifications
Manual validation of PTM-containing spectra
Quantify stoichiometry of modifications at specific sites
Validate key modifications using site-specific antibodies or mutational analysis
Functional correlation:
Generate site-specific mutants (phosphomimetic, phospho-null)
Test effects on protein-protein interactions, localization, and function
Correlate PTM status with cellular conditions or developmental stages
| PTM Type | Enrichment Method | MS Fragmentation | Typical Stoichiometry | Validation Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | TiO2 or IMAC | HCD and ETD | 1-100% | Phospho-specific antibodies |
| Ubiquitination | K-ε-GG antibody | HCD | 0.1-5% | Ubiquitin-specific antibodies |
| Acetylation | Anti-acetyl lysine | HCD | 1-30% | Acetyl-lysine antibodies |
| Glycosylation | Lectin enrichment | ETD/ECD | 80-100% | Glycosidase treatment |
When facing expression challenges similar to those reported for chicken γN-crystallin :
Codon optimization:
Analyze the codon adaptation index (CAI) for the chicken GGNBP2 sequence
Optimize codons for E. coli expression while maintaining key structural features
Consider synthetic gene synthesis for optimized sequences
Expression system alternatives:
Test multiple E. coli strains (BL21, Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Consider insect cell expression (baculovirus system)
Evaluate wheat germ or rabbit reticulocyte cell-free expression systems
Fusion partner screening:
Test multiple solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, TrxA)
Compare N-terminal vs. C-terminal tag placement
Include TEV or PreScission protease sites for tag removal
Expression parameter matrix:
Systematically test combinations of temperature (15-37°C)
Vary IPTG concentration (0.1-1.0 mM)
Adjust media composition (LB, TB, autoinduction)
Test expression duration (4-48 hours)
Protein stabilization:
Include chemical chaperones in growth media (4% ethanol, 1M sorbitol)
Add ligands or cofactors that might stabilize the protein
Test expression in the presence of binding partners
For developing specific antibodies:
Epitope selection strategy:
Target unique, exposed regions of chicken GGNBP2
Select multiple peptides (15-20 amino acids) with high antigenicity scores
Ensure epitopes are not in regions prone to post-translational modifications
Verify uniqueness against the chicken proteome
Antibody production considerations:
Conjugate peptides to carrier proteins (KLH or BSA)
Immunize multiple rabbits for each epitope
Use affinity purification against the specific peptide
Test bleeds at multiple timepoints to select optimal harvest
Validation methods:
Test against recombinant GGNBP2 protein
Include knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls
Perform peptide competition assays
Verify specificity across multiple chicken tissues
Alternative detection methods:
Consider epitope tagging strategies (HA, FLAG, V5)
Use anti-tag antibodies for detection of recombinant protein
Develop proximity ligation assays for enhanced specificity
Employ mass spectrometry for label-free detection
When facing discrepancies between RNA and protein detection, as observed with chicken γ-crystallins :
Transcript analysis refinement:
Verify RNA integrity through bioanalyzer analysis
Design multiple primer pairs targeting different exons
Quantify absolute transcript copy number using digital PCR
Assess potential alternative splicing through full transcript sequencing
Protein detection enhancement:
Implement protein enrichment strategies before western blotting
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Increase protein loading (up to 100μg per lane)
Test alternative detection methods (chemiluminescence vs. fluorescence)
Translation efficiency assessment:
Analyze 5' and 3' UTRs for regulatory elements
Perform polysome profiling to assess translation status
Investigate microRNA targeting through bioinformatics and reporter assays
Test protein stability through cycloheximide chase experiments
Targeted proteomics approach:
Develop selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) assays
Target multiple unique peptides from the protein of interest
Include stable isotope-labeled standard peptides for quantification
Establish limits of detection for low-abundance proteins