Recombinant Chicken Selenoprotein T (SELT)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
SELENOT; RCJMB04_16o1; Thioredoxin reductase-like selenoprotein T; SelT; EC 1.8.1.9
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
25-199
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Gallus gallus (Chicken)
Target Names
SELENOT
Target Protein Sequence
AEQGGV PAKKLRMAYA TGPLLKFQIC VSUGYRRVFE EYMRVISQRY PDIRIEGENY LPQPIYRHIA SFLSVFKLVL IGLIIVGKDP FAFFGMQAPS IWQWGQENKV YACMMVFFLS NMIENQCMST GAFEITLNDV PVWSKLESGH LPSMQQLVQI LDNEMKLNVH MESMPHHRS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Selenoprotein with thioredoxin reductase-like oxidoreductase activity.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Studies indicate that a selenium-deficient diet reduces selenoprotein T (SelT) levels and increases oxidative stress in chicken immune organs. PMID: 24958020
Database Links
Protein Families
SelWTH family, Selenoprotein T subfamily
Subcellular Location
Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Selenoprotein T (SELT) and what are its primary functions in chickens?

Selenoprotein T (SELT) is a selenium-containing protein that plays several critical roles in chicken physiology. Research indicates that SELT is primarily associated with the regulation of calcium homeostasis and neuroendocrine secretion. Additionally, it influences cell adhesion mechanisms and participates in redox regulation within cellular environments . In chickens specifically, SELT appears to be particularly important in immune organ function, where selenium deficiency can impair proper immune development and response .

Unlike many standard proteins, SELT incorporates the amino acid selenocysteine, which contains selenium in place of sulfur. This selenocysteine residue is crucial for the protein's redox functions and represents the biologically active form of selenium within the protein structure.

How does chicken SELT compare structurally to SELT in other species?

Detailed sequence analysis of chicken SELT reveals remarkable conservation across species. Studies have demonstrated that both the coding sequence (CDS) and deduced amino acid sequence of chicken SELT are highly homologous to those found in at least 17 other animal species, including various mammals . This high degree of conservation suggests that SELT serves fundamental biological functions that have been preserved throughout evolutionary history.

The redox function and response to selenium deficiency observed in chicken SELT appears to be conserved across species, indicating similar mechanistic pathways. This conservation makes chicken SELT a valuable model for studying selenoprotein function more broadly across species .

What expression patterns does SELT show in chicken tissues?

SELT demonstrates differential expression across chicken tissues, with particularly notable presence in immune organs including the spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius . This expression pattern correlates with its proposed immune regulatory functions. During selenium deficiency conditions, SELT expression levels decrease significantly across these immune tissues, with corresponding increases in oxidative stress markers .

Expression levels also appear to be developmentally regulated, with studies measuring SELT at different points (15, 25, 35, 45, and 55 days of age) showing age-dependent variations in expression patterns . These temporal changes suggest specific roles during different developmental stages of the chicken immune system.

How should experiments be designed to study chicken SELT expression under different selenium conditions?

When designing experiments to study chicken SELT expression under different selenium conditions, researchers should implement a balanced control group design. This approach involves:

  • Randomized allocation of subjects (chickens) to experimental groups

  • Establishing a control group with normal selenium intake and an experimental group with modified selenium levels

  • Collection of baseline measurements for all subjects

  • Controlled environmental conditions across groups

  • Appropriate timeframes for selenium status to influence SELT expression

For example, a well-designed study would follow this methodology:

  • Begin with day-old chickens randomly divided into at least two groups: a control group (C) receiving adequate selenium (typically 0.2 mg/kg Se as sodium selenite) and a low selenium group (L) receiving a selenium-deficient diet (approximately 0.020 mg/kg Se)

  • Collect tissue samples at multiple time points (e.g., 15, 25, 35, 45, and 55 days of age) to capture developmental changes

  • Measure SELT expression using RT-PCR and correlate with selenium status and oxidative stress markers

  • Include measurements of related selenoproteins or enzymes such as SPS1 and SecS to understand broader selenium metabolism pathways

This approach ensures that observed differences in SELT expression can be attributed to selenium status while controlling for other variables.

What analytical methods are most appropriate for measuring SELT expression in chicken tissues?

For quantitative analysis of chicken SELT expression, several complementary methods should be employed:

Molecular Expression Analysis:

  • Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) represents the gold standard for measuring SELT mRNA expression levels

  • Sample preparation should include careful RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis with appropriate reference genes

  • Primers should be designed specifically for chicken SELT sequences to ensure specificity

Protein Level Analysis:

  • Western blotting with specific antibodies against chicken SELT

  • Immunohistochemistry to visualize tissue localization patterns

  • ELISA for quantitative protein measurements

Functional Assessment:

  • Measurement of oxidative stress markers including catalase (CAT) activity, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) levels, and hydroxyl radical (- OH) concentrations to correlate with SELT expression

  • Calcium signaling assays to assess SELT's role in calcium homeostasis

When reporting results, researchers should present both raw data and statistically analyzed findings with appropriate significance testing (P < 0.05 is typically considered significant for SELT expression differences) .

What controls should be included when studying recombinant chicken SELT production?

When studying recombinant chicken SELT production, comprehensive controls must be incorporated:

Expression System Controls:

  • Empty vector control - cells transformed with expression vector lacking SELT gene

  • Housekeeping protein expression control - expression of a well-characterized protein under the same conditions

  • Wild-type cell control - untransformed cells maintained under identical conditions

Selenium Supplementation Controls:

  • Selenium-supplemented media - to ensure selenocysteine incorporation

  • Selenium-deficient media - to establish baseline expression without selenocysteine incorporation

  • Dose-response controls - varying selenium concentrations to determine optimal levels

Protein Functionality Controls:

  • Wild-type SELT control - native protein extracted from chicken tissues

  • Selenium-to-sulfur substitution control - cysteine variant to demonstrate selenium-specific functions

  • Denatured protein control - heat-inactivated recombinant SELT

These controls help distinguish between effects related to the recombinant protein production system versus intrinsic SELT functions, and ensure that the recombinant protein accurately reflects native SELT properties.

How can recombinant chicken SELT be used to study oxidative stress mechanisms in avian systems?

Recombinant chicken SELT provides a powerful tool for investigating oxidative stress mechanisms in avian systems through several research applications:

Mechanistic Studies:
Purified recombinant SELT can be used to directly assess its antioxidant capacity in cell-free systems, measuring its ability to neutralize reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals. Research has established that selenium deficiency reduces catalase activity and increases H₂O₂ and hydroxyl radical levels in chicken immune organs, suggesting SELT's involvement in redox regulation .

Cell Culture Models:
Recombinant SELT can be introduced to chicken cell cultures under controlled oxidative stress conditions to evaluate:

  • Changes in cellular ROS levels and antioxidant enzyme activities

  • Cell survival rates during oxidative challenges

  • Potential protective mechanisms against oxidative damage

  • Interaction with other antioxidant systems

Structure-Function Relationship Analysis:
Using site-directed mutagenesis of recombinant SELT, researchers can modify specific domains to determine:

  • Which regions are essential for redox activity

  • How selenium incorporation affects protein function

  • The mechanism of electron transfer during antioxidant reactions

A typical experimental approach would involve treating chicken immune cells with various concentrations of recombinant SELT, followed by oxidative challenge, and measuring outcomes including cell viability, ROS levels, and expression of stress-response genes.

What glycosylation patterns are observed in chicken SELT, and how do they affect protein function?

Understanding glycosylation patterns in chicken SELT represents an advanced research area with important functional implications:

Glycosylation Profile Analysis:
Native chicken SELT contains specific glycosylation sites that may differ from mammalian SELT variants. Recombinant expression systems must be carefully selected to reproduce these patterns, as inappropriate glycosylation can alter protein folding, stability, and function .

Chicken-derived expression systems are particularly valuable for producing properly glycosylated SELT, as they naturally contain the avian-specific glycosylation machinery. When compared to mammalian expression systems, avian bioreactors may produce recombinant proteins with glycosylation patterns closer to the native state .

Functional Impact Assessment:
Different glycosylation patterns can significantly impact:

  • Protein half-life in circulation

  • Binding affinity to receptors and interaction partners

  • Immunogenicity profiles

  • Subcellular localization patterns

Researchers studying recombinant chicken SELT should employ glycoproteomic approaches including mass spectrometry to characterize glycosylation patterns and correlate them with functional assays to determine their biological significance.

How does recombinant chicken SELT interact with other selenium-dependent proteins in immune regulation?

The interplay between recombinant chicken SELT and other selenoproteins in immune regulation represents a complex research area:

Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments with recombinant SELT can identify binding partners within immune cell populations. Research suggests potential interactions with selenium synthesis machinery components like selenophosphate synthetase-1 (SPS1) and selenocysteine synthase (SecS), which show coordinated expression patterns with SELT in chicken immune organs .

Pathway Analysis:
Recombinant SELT can be used to map signaling cascades in immune cells through:

  • Phosphorylation state analysis following SELT treatment

  • Calcium signaling pathway activation measurement

  • Changes in gene expression profiles of immune regulatory factors

Competitive Binding Studies:
In selenium-limited conditions, various selenoproteins compete for available selenium. Using recombinant SELT in controlled expression systems allows investigation of:

  • Hierarchical selenium incorporation patterns

  • Compensatory mechanisms when SELT is abundant or deficient

  • Cross-talk between different selenoprotein synthesis pathways

Research findings indicate that selenium deficiency simultaneously reduces expression of SELT, SPS1, and SecS in chicken immune organs, suggesting coordinated regulation mechanisms that warrant further investigation using recombinant protein approaches .

What expression systems are most suitable for producing functional recombinant chicken SELT?

Selecting the appropriate expression system for recombinant chicken SELT requires careful consideration of several factors:

Eukaryotic Expression Systems:
Mammalian cell lines (CHO, HEK293) offer advantages for producing chicken SELT with proper post-translational modifications, but may introduce mammalian-specific glycosylation patterns that differ from native chicken patterns . These systems require specialized vectors containing selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) elements to facilitate selenocysteine incorporation.

Avian Expression Systems:
Transgenic chicken systems represent an emerging and highly promising approach for producing authentic chicken SELT. This methodology involves:

  • Expression of target genes in chicken ovarian cells

  • Production of recombinant proteins in egg whites

  • Preservation of avian-specific post-translational modifications

The avian bioreactor system offers several advantages including:

  • Short production cycle

  • High production efficiency

  • Lower research costs compared to mammalian bioreactors

  • Expression products closer to their natural state

  • Easier purification processes

Table 1: Comparison of Expression Systems for Recombinant Chicken SELT Production

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesSelenocysteine IncorporationGlycosylation Pattern
E. coliHigh yield, low costLimited post-translational modificationsRequires specialized vectors and selenite supplementationNone
YeastModerate cost, eukaryotic processingDifferent glycosylation patternsPossible with modificationsDifferent from avian
Mammalian cellsGood post-translational modificationsHigh cost, lower yieldEfficient with SECIS elementsMammalian-specific
Transgenic chickenAuthentic avian modifications, high yieldLonger development timeHighly efficientNative avian pattern

When designing expression systems, researchers should prioritize selenium supplementation protocols to ensure proper selenocysteine incorporation, which is essential for SELT functionality.

What purification challenges are specific to recombinant chicken SELT, and how can they be addressed?

Purifying recombinant chicken SELT presents several specific challenges that must be addressed through optimized protocols:

Selenocysteine Oxidation Issues:
The selenocysteine residue in SELT is highly susceptible to oxidation during purification, which can compromise protein function. This challenge can be addressed by:

  • Adding reducing agents (DTT, β-mercaptoethanol) to all purification buffers

  • Working under nitrogen atmosphere when possible

  • Including antioxidants like glutathione in purification solutions

  • Performing rapid purification at 4°C to minimize oxidation time

Affinity Tag Considerations:
Selection of appropriate affinity tags must balance purification efficiency with functional impact:

  • C-terminal tags are generally preferred since N-terminal modifications may affect signal peptide processing

  • His-tags represent a common choice but may coordinate with selenol groups

  • Larger tags (GST, MBP) can improve solubility but may need removal for functional studies

  • Tag removal should employ proteases with high specificity to preserve SELT integrity

Avian-Specific Considerations:
When purifying from chicken-expressed systems:

  • Egg white proteins require specific separation strategies due to high albumin content

  • Isoelectric focusing can leverage SELT's unique pI for separation

  • Specialized affinity chromatography using anti-SELT antibodies may provide highly specific purification

A recommended purification workflow combines immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for initial capture, followed by ion exchange chromatography and size exclusion chromatography for final polishing, with all steps performed under reducing conditions.

How should researchers design experimental controls when studying the effects of recombinant chicken SELT on immune cell function?

When investigating recombinant chicken SELT effects on immune cell function, robust experimental controls are essential:

Protein-Specific Controls:

  • Heat-denatured SELT control - to distinguish between effects requiring proper protein folding versus non-specific protein effects

  • Selenium-free SELT variant control - with selenocysteine replaced by cysteine to isolate selenium-dependent functions

  • Dose-response gradient - multiple concentrations to establish physiologically relevant dosing

  • Time-course experiments - to distinguish between immediate and delayed effects

Cell Culture Controls:

  • Matched untreated control cells from the same isolation batch

  • Vehicle control containing all buffer components without SELT

  • Positive control using known immune stimulants (e.g., LPS, ConA)

  • Negative control using immunosuppressive agents

Functional Validation:

  • Include multiple immune cell types (T cells, B cells, macrophages) to determine cell-specific responses

  • Measure multiple parameters of immune function (proliferation, cytokine production, cell surface marker expression)

  • Include selenium supplementation and depletion conditions to model findings from in vivo studies showing SELT's response to selenium status

Experimental design should follow established protocols for control group balancing as used in selenium deficiency studies in chickens, where treatment groups are balanced based on baseline measurements before experimental intervention .

What are the primary technical challenges in producing functional recombinant chicken SELT?

Production of functional recombinant chicken SELT faces several significant technical challenges:

Selenocysteine Incorporation:
The fundamental challenge in SELT production stems from selenocysteine incorporation, which requires specialized translation machinery. The UGA codon, typically a stop codon, must be recognized as coding for selenocysteine through the selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) element. Expression systems must contain:

  • Functional selenocysteine synthesis pathway

  • Adequate selenium supplementation in growth media

  • Properly positioned SECIS elements in expression constructs

Maintaining Redox State:
SELT's functional properties depend on maintaining the selenocysteine residue in a reduced state. Challenges include:

  • Preventing oxidation during expression and purification

  • Ensuring proper folding around the selenocysteine residue

  • Maintaining stability during storage and experimental use

Avian-Specific Post-Translational Modifications:
Research suggests that chicken SELT may contain specific post-translational modifications that affect its function. Using mammalian expression systems may result in proteins with altered:

  • Glycosylation patterns

  • Disulfide bond formation

  • Subcellular targeting sequences

Advanced genetic engineering approaches such as CRISPR/Cas9 have revolutionized the precision and efficiency of generating recombinant proteins in avian systems, providing new opportunities to address these challenges .

How can researchers address data inconsistencies when comparing recombinant versus native chicken SELT function?

When confronting data inconsistencies between recombinant and native SELT function, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

Source Authentication:

  • Confirm the exact sequence of the recombinant protein matches the native chicken sequence

  • Verify chicken breed/strain consistency across studies, as genetic variations may exist

  • Ensure age-matching, as SELT expression and function change developmentally

Functional Characterization Matrix:
Develop a comprehensive comparison matrix that includes:

  • Detailed structural analysis (mass spectrometry, circular dichroism)

  • PTM profiling (glycosylation, phosphorylation states)

  • Selenium content quantification per protein molecule

  • Enzymatic activity measurements under standardized conditions

  • Binding affinity assays for known interaction partners

Methodological Standardization:
Adopt consistent protocols across labs for:

  • Expression system selection

  • Purification methods

  • Activity assays

  • Storage conditions

  • Experimental design elements like controls and statistical approaches

Research has shown that selenium deficiency affects multiple aspects of SELT function simultaneously, reducing expression levels while increasing oxidative stress markers . This multifactorial response may explain apparent inconsistencies when only single parameters are measured.

What emerging technologies might advance recombinant chicken SELT research in the coming years?

Several emerging technologies show promise for advancing recombinant chicken SELT research:

CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Chickens:
The application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to chicken genome editing represents a revolutionary approach for SELT research. This technology enables:

  • Precise modification of the endogenous SELT gene

  • Creation of reporter constructs for live visualization of SELT expression

  • Development of conditional knockout models to study SELT function in specific tissues

  • Generation of transgenic chicken lines producing modified SELT variants in eggs

Advanced Protein Engineering:
Novel protein engineering approaches offer opportunities to create specialized SELT variants:

  • Selenium-specific click chemistry for tracking SELT in cellular systems

  • Unnatural amino acid incorporation to create SELT with enhanced stability

  • Protein scaffolding to develop multi-functional SELT fusion proteins

  • Directed evolution to optimize specific SELT properties

High-Throughput Functional Genomics:
Integration of SELT research with broader -omics approaches:

  • Proteome-wide interaction mapping to identify SELT binding partners

  • Transcriptome analysis of SELT-dependent gene regulation

  • Metabolomics profiling to identify SELT-dependent metabolic pathways

  • Systems biology modeling of selenium utilization hierarchies

These technologies, particularly the development of chicken-based expression systems using gene editing, show remarkable potential for advancing our understanding of SELT biology while overcoming current technical limitations in recombinant protein production .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.