RCJMB04_18o22 belongs to a family of uncharacterized proteins (UPF0454 homologs) with conserved sequences across vertebrates. Key identifiers include:
| Gene Name | Species | Other Names |
|---|---|---|
| RCJMB04_18o22 | Chicken | C15H12orf49; C12orf49 |
| C17H12orf49 | Bovine | Chromosome 17 C12orf49 homolog |
| 2410131K14Rik | Mouse | RIKEN cDNA 2410131K14 gene |
| c12orf49.S | Xenopus laevis | Chromosome 12 open reading frame 49 S homeolog |
| zgc:110063 | Danio rerio | Spring protein |
These homologs share structural similarities, though their specific biological functions are not yet elucidated .
The protein is synthesized in multiple host systems, with purity levels exceeding 85% as verified by SDS-PAGE:
| Host System | Purity | Applications |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | ≥85% | High-yield protein expression |
| Yeast | ≥85% | Post-translational modification compatibility |
| Baculovirus | ≥85% | Mammalian-like protein folding |
| Mammalian cells | ≥85% | Complex glycosylation studies |
For chicken-specific production, yeast-based systems are commonly used due to scalable yields and cost efficiency .
While direct experimental data for RCJMB04_18o22 is limited, its homologs in other species suggest potential utility in:
Functional Studies: Investigating roles in cellular processes (e.g., protein interactions, signaling pathways).
Antibody Development: Cross-reactivity testing with anti-human or anti-zebrafish antibodies (e.g., rabbit anti-human C12orf49 antibodies suitable for ELISA and IHC) .
Comparative Genomics: Analyzing evolutionary conservation across vertebrates.
Note: Current literature lacks specific findings on this chicken homolog, emphasizing the need for targeted research .
The Recombinant Chicken UPF0454 protein C12orf49 homolog (RCJMB04_18o22) is a protein expressed in chicken tissue that shares homology with the human C12orf49 protein. Based on comparative genomics, this protein contains the evolutionarily conserved DUF2054 domain that is present across multiple species including humans, zebrafish, and potentially some plants. The recombinant form is produced using DNA technology where the chicken gene encoding this protein is inserted into expression vectors and introduced into host systems (typically bacterial, insect, or mammalian cells) to produce the protein in larger quantities for research purposes .
The chicken C12orf49 homolog likely shares structural similarities with its human counterpart, featuring:
An N-terminal region that serves as a Golgi localization signal
The highly conserved DUF2054 (Domain of Unknown Function 2054) domain, which is essential for its biological activity
Potential N-glycosylation sites that may affect protein-protein interactions
Unlike some plant homologs (such as in A. thaliana) that possess additional C-terminal glycosyltransferase domains, the chicken version likely maintains a structure more similar to that of other vertebrates, focused on the core regulatory functions associated with lipid metabolism .
Based on evolutionary conservation patterns, the chicken C12orf49 homolog likely serves similar functions to its mammalian counterparts. In mammals, C12orf49 plays a crucial role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism by:
Localizing to the Golgi apparatus
Binding to site 1 protease (MBTPS1)
Facilitating the cleavage of SREBP transcription factors and other MBTPS1 substrates
Promoting cell proliferation under cholesterol-depleted conditions
Given the high level of conservation of the DUF2054 domain across species, the chicken homolog can be expected to perform similar functions in avian cholesterol and lipid homeostasis, though species-specific regulatory mechanisms may exist .
For the recombinant production of chicken C12orf49 homolog, researchers typically employ several expression systems, each with advantages for different research applications:
| Expression System | Advantages | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid production | Basic structural studies, antibody production |
| Insect cells | Post-translational modifications, proper folding | Functional assays, complex formation studies |
| Mammalian cells (CHO, HEK293) | Native-like glycosylation, proper folding | Interaction studies, functional characterization |
| Yeast (S. cerevisiae, P. pastoris) | Post-translational modifications, high yield | Structural studies, large-scale production |
The choice of expression system should be guided by the specific research objectives. For studies focusing on protein-protein interactions, particularly with MBTPS1, mammalian expression systems may provide the most physiologically relevant results as they can properly localize the protein to the Golgi and maintain necessary post-translational modifications .
The chicken C12orf49 homolog likely plays a role in SREBP processing similar to its human counterpart, but with avian-specific adaptations. In the SREBP processing pathway:
The protein likely localizes to the Golgi apparatus through its N-terminal targeting sequence
It interacts with and modulates the activity of avian MBTPS1 (site 1 protease)
This interaction facilitates the proteolytic processing of SREBPs and other MBTPS1 substrates
Processed SREBPs then translocate to the nucleus to regulate genes involved in lipid metabolism
Experimental evidence from mammalian systems indicates that C12orf49 functions downstream of SCAP (SREBP cleavage-activating protein) localization but upstream of mature SREBP function. Knockdown or knockout of C12orf49 in mammalian systems prevents SREBP cleavage even upon brefeldin A treatment, suggesting the chicken homolog may similarly be essential for SREBP processing rather than affecting the nuclear function of mature SREBPs .
To fully characterize this pathway in chicken cells, researchers should design experiments comparing wild-type and C12orf49-depleted chicken hepatocytes or fibroblasts under various sterol conditions to examine SREBP processing efficiency.
For investigating protein-protein interactions of chicken C12orf49 homolog, particularly with MBTPS1 and other potential binding partners, several complementary approaches are recommended:
| Technique | Application | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Direct protein binding | Detects native interactions | Requires specific antibodies |
| Proximity ligation assay | In-situ interaction detection | Visualizes interactions in cellular context | Technical complexity |
| FRET/BRET | Real-time interaction dynamics | Monitors interactions in living cells | Requires fluorescent/luminescent tags |
| Yeast two-hybrid | Interaction screening | Identifies novel binding partners | High false positive rate |
| BioID or APEX | Proximity-based labeling | Maps neighborhood interactions | May capture transient interactions |
| Cross-linking mass spectrometry | Binding interface mapping | Identifies interaction surfaces | Complex data analysis |
Research on human C12orf49 has shown that it specifically immunoprecipitates with an N-glycosylated form of S1P (MBTPS1), with this interaction being sensitive to PNGase F treatment. This interaction requires both the proper Golgi localization of the protein and the presence of the DUF2054 domain. Similar experimental approaches should be effective for the chicken homolog, with attention to potential species-specific differences in glycosylation patterns .
The functional conservation of C12orf49 across species appears significant but with some taxonomic variations:
| Species | Functional Conservation | Notable Differences | Complementation Ability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Reference | - | - |
| Mouse | High | Minor regulatory differences | Complete rescue expected |
| Zebrafish | High | Developmental timing variations | Complete rescue demonstrated |
| Chicken | High (predicted) | Avian-specific regulatory elements | Likely complete rescue |
| A. thaliana | Partial | Additional glycosyltransferase domain | Failed to rescue in human cells |
Crystallizing chicken C12orf49 homolog presents several challenges that researchers must address:
Membrane association: The protein's Golgi localization suggests it may have membrane-interacting regions that reduce solubility and homogeneity
Post-translational modifications: N-glycosylation sites may create heterogeneity in the protein sample
Flexible regions: The protein likely contains disordered regions that impede crystal formation
Protein-protein interactions: Its function in binding MBTPS1 suggests it may not be stable in isolation
To overcome these challenges, researchers might consider:
Creating truncated constructs focusing on the DUF2054 domain
Using deglycosylation enzymes like PNGase F to reduce glycan heterogeneity
Employing co-crystallization with stabilizing binding partners
Exploring alternative structural biology techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy or NMR for flexible regions
When designing CRISPR-Cas9 knockout experiments for the chicken C12orf49 homolog:
Target selection:
Target the conserved DUF2054 domain for maximum disruption
Design at least 3-4 guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting different exons
Avoid regions with potential off-target effects using predictive algorithms
Cell line selection:
Use chicken hepatocyte cell lines (such as LMH) for metabolic studies
Consider chicken fibroblast lines for general cellular functions
Include appropriate wild-type and negative control cell lines
Validation approaches:
Confirm gene disruption by sequencing the targeted locus
Verify protein loss by Western blotting with specific antibodies
Perform rescue experiments with wild-type chicken C12orf49 and mutant variants
Phenotypic characterization:
The optimal expression vector systems for recombinant production of chicken C12orf49 homolog depend on the intended application:
| Vector System | Host | Features | Optimal Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| pET series | E. coli | T7 promoter, high yield | Basic protein characterization, antibody production |
| pFastBac/Bac-to-Bac | Insect cells | Baculovirus-based, glycosylation capacity | Functional studies requiring post-translational modifications |
| pcDNA/pCMV | Mammalian cells | Strong promoters, native-like processing | Interaction studies, functional assays |
| pAcGP67 | Insect cells | Secretory production | Purification of soluble domains |
| pCAGGS | Avian cells | Strong promoter active in avian cells | Chicken-specific studies |
For studies involving Golgi localization and MBTPS1 interaction, mammalian or avian expression systems would be most appropriate as they maintain the cellular compartmentalization and post-translational modifications necessary for authentic function. For biochemical characterization of the DUF2054 domain, bacterial systems may suffice if protein solubility can be achieved .
To establish a reliable cholesterol metabolism assay using chicken C12orf49 homolog:
Cell system preparation:
Generate C12orf49-knockout chicken cell lines using CRISPR-Cas9
Create stable lines expressing wild-type or mutant versions of chicken C12orf49
Include appropriate controls (wild-type cells, empty vector transfected)
Cholesterol depletion protocol:
Culture cells in lipoprotein-deficient serum
Add cholesterol synthesis inhibitors (e.g., statins)
Include sterol regulatory elements (25-hydroxycholesterol) in control conditions
Validation experiments:
Generating specific antibodies against chicken C12orf49 homolog requires careful consideration of several factors:
Antigen design strategy:
Full-length protein: Provides comprehensive epitope coverage but may include conserved regions
DUF2054 domain: Targets the functional region but may cross-react with homologs
N-terminal region: Potentially more species-specific but may be less accessible in native protein
Synthetic peptides: High specificity but potentially lower affinity
Production considerations:
Recombinant protein expression should maintain native conformation
Consider using chicken-specific sequences that differ from mammalian homologs
Ensure high purity (>90%) of immunogen
Antibody validation protocols:
Western blot against recombinant protein and chicken tissue lysates
Immunoprecipitation to confirm specific binding
Immunofluorescence to verify Golgi localization
Testing in C12orf49-knockout cells as negative controls
Cross-reactivity assessment with human/mouse homologs
Application-specific considerations:
| Application | Antibody Type | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Western blotting | Polyclonal/Monoclonal | Linear epitope recognition |
| Immunoprecipitation | Monoclonal | High affinity, specific binding |
| Immunohistochemistry | Monoclonal | Fixation-resistant epitopes |
| Proximity ligation | Paired antibodies | Non-overlapping epitopes |
| ELISA | Matched pair | Capture/detection optimization |
Researchers should prioritize antibodies that can distinguish between chicken C12orf49 and mammalian homologs when working in mixed systems .
When interpreting differences in SREBP processing between chicken and mammalian systems involving C12orf49 homologs, researchers should consider:
Evolutionary context:
Birds and mammals diverged approximately 320 million years ago
Avian-specific adaptations in lipid metabolism related to egg production and flight
Potential differences in regulatory mechanisms while maintaining core pathway functions
Interpretation guidelines:
Direct comparison requires equivalent cellular contexts (e.g., hepatocytes from both species)
Consider differences in baseline cholesterol metabolism between species
Account for variations in protein expression levels when comparing knockout phenotypes
Distinguish between qualitative (pathway architecture) and quantitative (processing efficiency) differences
Validation approach:
For analyzing C12orf49 knockout phenotypes in chicken cells, the following statistical approaches are recommended:
Experimental design considerations:
Use multiple independent knockout clones (minimum 3)
Include appropriate controls (wild-type, empty vector)
Perform rescue experiments to confirm specificity
Account for potential off-target effects
Statistical methods by data type:
| Data Type | Statistical Approach | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Gene expression (qPCR) | ANOVA with post-hoc tests | Log-transform data if not normally distributed |
| Protein levels (Western blot) | t-tests or ANOVA | Normalize to appropriate loading controls |
| Cell viability assays | Survival analysis | Consider time-dependent effects |
| Lipid measurements | ANOVA or non-parametric tests | Account for potential non-normal distribution |
| High-dimensional data | PCA or clustering analysis | Appropriate for transcriptomics/proteomics |
Multiple testing correction:
Apply Benjamini-Hochberg or Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons
Consider false discovery rate control for genome-wide studies
Effect size reporting:
Include fold-change values alongside p-values
Report confidence intervals when possible
Use standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d) for cross-study comparison
Power analysis:
Differentiating between direct and indirect effects of chicken C12orf49 homolog on lipid metabolism requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:
Temporal analysis:
Use inducible knockout/knockdown systems to monitor immediate versus delayed effects
Perform time-course experiments after C12orf49 depletion to establish sequence of events
Monitor acute changes in SREBP processing versus long-term adaptations
Mechanistic dissection:
Direct effects: Immediate disruption of MBTPS1-dependent SREBP processing
Indirect effects: Secondary changes in gene expression or cellular metabolism
Domain-specific perturbation:
Generate mutations in specific domains (e.g., DUF2054) to disrupt particular functions
Use domain-swapping experiments to isolate functional regions
Complementary approaches:
The study of chicken C12orf49 homolog offers unique insights into avian-specific lipid metabolism:
Avian-specific metabolic adaptations:
Birds have distinct lipid metabolism related to egg production
Avian liver is the primary site of lipogenesis (unlike mammals where adipose tissue plays a major role)
Unique regulatory mechanisms exist for mobilizing lipids during migration and reproduction
Research opportunities:
Comparative analysis of C12orf49 function in liver versus adipose tissue in chickens
Examination of sex-specific differences related to egg production
Investigation of seasonal variations in C12orf49 expression and function
Analysis of C12orf49's role in yolk formation and deposition
Potential discoveries:
| Aspect | Research Focus | Potential Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Egg production | C12orf49's role in yolk lipid synthesis | Improved understanding of reproductive biology |
| Flight capability | Metabolism during extended migration | Insights into extreme metabolic adaptations |
| Species diversity | C12orf49 variation across avian species | Evolutionary insights into metabolic adaptation |
| Domestic chicken breeds | C12orf49 variants in different breeds | Agricultural applications |
Translational relevance:
Several promising research directions for understanding the molecular function of C12orf49 homologs include:
Structural biology approaches:
Crystal or cryo-EM structure of the DUF2054 domain
Structural analysis of C12orf49-MBTPS1 complex
Molecular dynamics simulations of protein-protein interactions
Comprehensive interactome mapping:
Proximity labeling combined with mass spectrometry
Identification of additional binding partners beyond MBTPS1
Comparison of interactomes across species
Detailed mechanistic studies:
Precise role in enhancing MBTPS1 activity
Potential regulatory post-translational modifications
Investigation of potential enzyme activity within the DUF2054 domain
Evolutionary studies:
Researchers can leverage the cross-species conservation of C12orf49 for comparative studies through several strategic approaches:
Phylogenetic analysis framework:
Construct comprehensive phylogenetic trees of C12orf49 homologs
Identify regions under purifying versus diversifying selection
Correlate sequence divergence with functional differences
Map species-specific insertions/deletions to functional domains
Complementation studies:
Express homologs from different species in knockout cellular models
Assess the ability to rescue SREBP processing defects
Identify species-specific functional constraints
Create chimeric proteins to map functional domains
Comparative expression analysis:
| Species | Tissue Distribution | Developmental Regulation | Metabolic Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Broad, highest in liver | Stable in adult tissues | Responsive to sterol levels |
| Mouse | Similar to human | Developmental changes | Similar to human |
| Chicken | Predicted broad expression | Potential egg-laying regulation | Likely sterol-responsive |
| Zebrafish | Broad expression | Critical in development | Responsive to dietary lipids |
Model organism comparative advantages:
Chickens: Avian-specific metabolism, egg production
Zebrafish: Developmental studies, in vivo lipid processing
Mice: Mammalian model, genetic tools availability
Cell culture: Mechanistic studies, high-throughput approaches
Evolutionary insights:
Researchers beginning work with chicken C12orf49 homolog should consider several key factors:
Experimental system selection:
Primary chicken hepatocytes provide physiologically relevant context but are challenging to maintain
Immortalized chicken cell lines offer convenience but may have altered metabolism
In vivo models (embryos, chickens) provide whole-organism context but increase complexity
Technical considerations:
Limited availability of chicken-specific reagents may require validation of cross-reactive tools
Need for appropriate controls when using antibodies developed against mammalian proteins
Potential requirement for custom tools (antibodies, constructs) specific to chicken C12orf49
Methodological priorities:
Verification of subcellular localization to the Golgi apparatus
Confirmation of interaction with chicken MBTPS1
Establishment of knockout/knockdown models
Characterization of effects on SREBP processing
Collaborative opportunities:
Research findings on C12orf49 homologs should be integrated into the broader understanding of metabolic regulation through:
Contextual framework:
Position C12orf49 within the established SREBP processing pathway
Connect findings to broader lipid homeostasis mechanisms
Consider species-specific adaptations versus core conserved functions
Relate to other Golgi-localized regulatory proteins
Translational connections:
| Research Area | Integration Approach | Potential Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Human disease | Link to hyperlipidemia findings | Biomarker or therapeutic target development |
| Agricultural science | Application to poultry research | Improved egg production, meat quality |
| Comparative metabolism | Cross-species analysis | Evolutionary insights |
| Systems biology | Network modeling | Comprehensive pathway understanding |
Knowledge dissemination strategy: