Recombinant Chicken UPF0454 protein C12orf49 homolog (RCJMB04_18o22)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Gene and Protein Characteristics

RCJMB04_18o22 belongs to a family of uncharacterized proteins (UPF0454 homologs) with conserved sequences across vertebrates. Key identifiers include:

Gene NameSpeciesOther Names
RCJMB04_18o22ChickenC15H12orf49; C12orf49
C17H12orf49BovineChromosome 17 C12orf49 homolog
2410131K14RikMouseRIKEN cDNA 2410131K14 gene
c12orf49.SXenopus laevisChromosome 12 open reading frame 49 S homeolog
zgc:110063Danio rerioSpring protein

These homologs share structural similarities, though their specific biological functions are not yet elucidated .

Production and Purity

The protein is synthesized in multiple host systems, with purity levels exceeding 85% as verified by SDS-PAGE:

Host SystemPurityApplications
E. coli≥85%High-yield protein expression
Yeast≥85%Post-translational modification compatibility
Baculovirus≥85%Mammalian-like protein folding
Mammalian cells≥85%Complex glycosylation studies

For chicken-specific production, yeast-based systems are commonly used due to scalable yields and cost efficiency .

Applications and Research Potential

While direct experimental data for RCJMB04_18o22 is limited, its homologs in other species suggest potential utility in:

  • Functional Studies: Investigating roles in cellular processes (e.g., protein interactions, signaling pathways).

  • Antibody Development: Cross-reactivity testing with anti-human or anti-zebrafish antibodies (e.g., rabbit anti-human C12orf49 antibodies suitable for ELISA and IHC) .

  • Comparative Genomics: Analyzing evolutionary conservation across vertebrates.

Note: Current literature lacks specific findings on this chicken homolog, emphasizing the need for targeted research .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a reference for your application.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us for prioritized development.
Synonyms
RCJMB04_18o22; UPF0454 protein C12orf49 homolog
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
25-205
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Gallus gallus (Chicken)
Target Names
RCJMB04_18o22
Target Protein Sequence
LSLVYF LSSTFKQEER TVRDRNLLQV QEHEQPILWK EQFSSGNGSH LSNQCRNSVQ GKLLITDELG YICERKDLLV NGCCNVNVPS TKLYSCDSCL PNGCCSVYEY CVSCCLQPSK QHLLERFLNR AAMAFQNLFM AVEDRFELCL AKCRTSSQSV QHENTYRDPI AKYCYGEYPP ELLPV
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein positively regulates hepatic SREBP signaling by modulating SCAP (SREBP cleavage-activating protein) localization within the endoplasmic reticulum, thereby controlling functional SCAP levels.
Database Links
Protein Families
UPF0454 family
Subcellular Location
Golgi apparatus membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the Recombinant Chicken UPF0454 protein C12orf49 homolog?

The Recombinant Chicken UPF0454 protein C12orf49 homolog (RCJMB04_18o22) is a protein expressed in chicken tissue that shares homology with the human C12orf49 protein. Based on comparative genomics, this protein contains the evolutionarily conserved DUF2054 domain that is present across multiple species including humans, zebrafish, and potentially some plants. The recombinant form is produced using DNA technology where the chicken gene encoding this protein is inserted into expression vectors and introduced into host systems (typically bacterial, insect, or mammalian cells) to produce the protein in larger quantities for research purposes .

What are the key structural features of Chicken C12orf49 homolog?

The chicken C12orf49 homolog likely shares structural similarities with its human counterpart, featuring:

  • An N-terminal region that serves as a Golgi localization signal

  • The highly conserved DUF2054 (Domain of Unknown Function 2054) domain, which is essential for its biological activity

  • Potential N-glycosylation sites that may affect protein-protein interactions

  • Subcellular localization primarily to the Golgi apparatus

Unlike some plant homologs (such as in A. thaliana) that possess additional C-terminal glycosyltransferase domains, the chicken version likely maintains a structure more similar to that of other vertebrates, focused on the core regulatory functions associated with lipid metabolism .

How is the function of Chicken C12orf49 homolog related to its mammalian counterparts?

Based on evolutionary conservation patterns, the chicken C12orf49 homolog likely serves similar functions to its mammalian counterparts. In mammals, C12orf49 plays a crucial role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism by:

  • Localizing to the Golgi apparatus

  • Binding to site 1 protease (MBTPS1)

  • Facilitating the cleavage of SREBP transcription factors and other MBTPS1 substrates

  • Promoting cell proliferation under cholesterol-depleted conditions

Given the high level of conservation of the DUF2054 domain across species, the chicken homolog can be expected to perform similar functions in avian cholesterol and lipid homeostasis, though species-specific regulatory mechanisms may exist .

What expression systems are typically used for recombinant production of this protein?

For the recombinant production of chicken C12orf49 homolog, researchers typically employ several expression systems, each with advantages for different research applications:

Expression SystemAdvantagesCommon Applications
E. coliHigh yield, cost-effective, rapid productionBasic structural studies, antibody production
Insect cellsPost-translational modifications, proper foldingFunctional assays, complex formation studies
Mammalian cells (CHO, HEK293)Native-like glycosylation, proper foldingInteraction studies, functional characterization
Yeast (S. cerevisiae, P. pastoris)Post-translational modifications, high yieldStructural studies, large-scale production

The choice of expression system should be guided by the specific research objectives. For studies focusing on protein-protein interactions, particularly with MBTPS1, mammalian expression systems may provide the most physiologically relevant results as they can properly localize the protein to the Golgi and maintain necessary post-translational modifications .

How does the Chicken C12orf49 homolog contribute to SREBP processing in avian systems?

The chicken C12orf49 homolog likely plays a role in SREBP processing similar to its human counterpart, but with avian-specific adaptations. In the SREBP processing pathway:

  • The protein likely localizes to the Golgi apparatus through its N-terminal targeting sequence

  • It interacts with and modulates the activity of avian MBTPS1 (site 1 protease)

  • This interaction facilitates the proteolytic processing of SREBPs and other MBTPS1 substrates

  • Processed SREBPs then translocate to the nucleus to regulate genes involved in lipid metabolism

Experimental evidence from mammalian systems indicates that C12orf49 functions downstream of SCAP (SREBP cleavage-activating protein) localization but upstream of mature SREBP function. Knockdown or knockout of C12orf49 in mammalian systems prevents SREBP cleavage even upon brefeldin A treatment, suggesting the chicken homolog may similarly be essential for SREBP processing rather than affecting the nuclear function of mature SREBPs .

To fully characterize this pathway in chicken cells, researchers should design experiments comparing wild-type and C12orf49-depleted chicken hepatocytes or fibroblasts under various sterol conditions to examine SREBP processing efficiency.

What methodological approaches are most effective for studying protein-protein interactions involving Chicken C12orf49 homolog?

For investigating protein-protein interactions of chicken C12orf49 homolog, particularly with MBTPS1 and other potential binding partners, several complementary approaches are recommended:

TechniqueApplicationAdvantagesConsiderations
Co-immunoprecipitationDirect protein bindingDetects native interactionsRequires specific antibodies
Proximity ligation assayIn-situ interaction detectionVisualizes interactions in cellular contextTechnical complexity
FRET/BRETReal-time interaction dynamicsMonitors interactions in living cellsRequires fluorescent/luminescent tags
Yeast two-hybridInteraction screeningIdentifies novel binding partnersHigh false positive rate
BioID or APEXProximity-based labelingMaps neighborhood interactionsMay capture transient interactions
Cross-linking mass spectrometryBinding interface mappingIdentifies interaction surfacesComplex data analysis

Research on human C12orf49 has shown that it specifically immunoprecipitates with an N-glycosylated form of S1P (MBTPS1), with this interaction being sensitive to PNGase F treatment. This interaction requires both the proper Golgi localization of the protein and the presence of the DUF2054 domain. Similar experimental approaches should be effective for the chicken homolog, with attention to potential species-specific differences in glycosylation patterns .

How does the chicken C12orf49 homolog compare to orthologs in other species in terms of functional conservation?

The functional conservation of C12orf49 across species appears significant but with some taxonomic variations:

SpeciesFunctional ConservationNotable DifferencesComplementation Ability
HumanReference--
MouseHighMinor regulatory differencesComplete rescue expected
ZebrafishHighDevelopmental timing variationsComplete rescue demonstrated
ChickenHigh (predicted)Avian-specific regulatory elementsLikely complete rescue
A. thalianaPartialAdditional glycosyltransferase domainFailed to rescue in human cells

What are the challenges in crystallizing the Chicken C12orf49a homolog for structural studies?

Crystallizing chicken C12orf49 homolog presents several challenges that researchers must address:

  • Membrane association: The protein's Golgi localization suggests it may have membrane-interacting regions that reduce solubility and homogeneity

  • Post-translational modifications: N-glycosylation sites may create heterogeneity in the protein sample

  • Flexible regions: The protein likely contains disordered regions that impede crystal formation

  • Protein-protein interactions: Its function in binding MBTPS1 suggests it may not be stable in isolation

To overcome these challenges, researchers might consider:

  • Creating truncated constructs focusing on the DUF2054 domain

  • Using deglycosylation enzymes like PNGase F to reduce glycan heterogeneity

  • Employing co-crystallization with stabilizing binding partners

  • Exploring alternative structural biology techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy or NMR for flexible regions

How should one design CRISPR-Cas9 knockout experiments for studying Chicken C12orf49 homolog function?

When designing CRISPR-Cas9 knockout experiments for the chicken C12orf49 homolog:

  • Target selection:

    • Target the conserved DUF2054 domain for maximum disruption

    • Design at least 3-4 guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting different exons

    • Avoid regions with potential off-target effects using predictive algorithms

  • Cell line selection:

    • Use chicken hepatocyte cell lines (such as LMH) for metabolic studies

    • Consider chicken fibroblast lines for general cellular functions

    • Include appropriate wild-type and negative control cell lines

  • Validation approaches:

    • Confirm gene disruption by sequencing the targeted locus

    • Verify protein loss by Western blotting with specific antibodies

    • Perform rescue experiments with wild-type chicken C12orf49 and mutant variants

  • Phenotypic characterization:

    • Assess SREBP processing under normal and sterol-depleted conditions

    • Examine lipid droplet formation using fluorescent dyes

    • Measure expression of SREBP target genes using qRT-PCR

    • Analyze cellular cholesterol and fatty acid levels

What expression vector systems are optimal for recombinant production of the Chicken C12orf49 homolog?

The optimal expression vector systems for recombinant production of chicken C12orf49 homolog depend on the intended application:

Vector SystemHostFeaturesOptimal Applications
pET seriesE. coliT7 promoter, high yieldBasic protein characterization, antibody production
pFastBac/Bac-to-BacInsect cellsBaculovirus-based, glycosylation capacityFunctional studies requiring post-translational modifications
pcDNA/pCMVMammalian cellsStrong promoters, native-like processingInteraction studies, functional assays
pAcGP67Insect cellsSecretory productionPurification of soluble domains
pCAGGSAvian cellsStrong promoter active in avian cellsChicken-specific studies

For studies involving Golgi localization and MBTPS1 interaction, mammalian or avian expression systems would be most appropriate as they maintain the cellular compartmentalization and post-translational modifications necessary for authentic function. For biochemical characterization of the DUF2054 domain, bacterial systems may suffice if protein solubility can be achieved .

How can researchers establish a reliable cholesterol metabolism assay using the Chicken C12orf49 homolog?

To establish a reliable cholesterol metabolism assay using chicken C12orf49 homolog:

  • Cell system preparation:

    • Generate C12orf49-knockout chicken cell lines using CRISPR-Cas9

    • Create stable lines expressing wild-type or mutant versions of chicken C12orf49

    • Include appropriate controls (wild-type cells, empty vector transfected)

  • Cholesterol depletion protocol:

    • Culture cells in lipoprotein-deficient serum

    • Add cholesterol synthesis inhibitors (e.g., statins)

    • Include sterol regulatory elements (25-hydroxycholesterol) in control conditions

  • Validation experiments:

    • Rescue experiments with human C12orf49 to confirm functional conservation

    • Brefeldin A treatment to assess Golgi-dependent SREBP processing

    • Overexpression of mature SREBP forms to bypass processing requirements

What are the key considerations for generating specific antibodies against the Chicken C12orf49 homolog?

Generating specific antibodies against chicken C12orf49 homolog requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Antigen design strategy:

    • Full-length protein: Provides comprehensive epitope coverage but may include conserved regions

    • DUF2054 domain: Targets the functional region but may cross-react with homologs

    • N-terminal region: Potentially more species-specific but may be less accessible in native protein

    • Synthetic peptides: High specificity but potentially lower affinity

  • Production considerations:

    • Recombinant protein expression should maintain native conformation

    • Consider using chicken-specific sequences that differ from mammalian homologs

    • Ensure high purity (>90%) of immunogen

  • Antibody validation protocols:

    • Western blot against recombinant protein and chicken tissue lysates

    • Immunoprecipitation to confirm specific binding

    • Immunofluorescence to verify Golgi localization

    • Testing in C12orf49-knockout cells as negative controls

    • Cross-reactivity assessment with human/mouse homologs

  • Application-specific considerations:

    ApplicationAntibody TypeKey Considerations
    Western blottingPolyclonal/MonoclonalLinear epitope recognition
    ImmunoprecipitationMonoclonalHigh affinity, specific binding
    ImmunohistochemistryMonoclonalFixation-resistant epitopes
    Proximity ligationPaired antibodiesNon-overlapping epitopes
    ELISAMatched pairCapture/detection optimization

Researchers should prioritize antibodies that can distinguish between chicken C12orf49 and mammalian homologs when working in mixed systems .

How should researchers interpret differences in SREBP processing patterns between chicken and mammalian systems?

When interpreting differences in SREBP processing between chicken and mammalian systems involving C12orf49 homologs, researchers should consider:

  • Evolutionary context:

    • Birds and mammals diverged approximately 320 million years ago

    • Avian-specific adaptations in lipid metabolism related to egg production and flight

    • Potential differences in regulatory mechanisms while maintaining core pathway functions

  • Interpretation guidelines:

    • Direct comparison requires equivalent cellular contexts (e.g., hepatocytes from both species)

    • Consider differences in baseline cholesterol metabolism between species

    • Account for variations in protein expression levels when comparing knockout phenotypes

    • Distinguish between qualitative (pathway architecture) and quantitative (processing efficiency) differences

  • Validation approach:

    • Cross-species complementation experiments to test functional conservation

    • Domain-swapping between chicken and mammalian C12orf49 to identify species-specific functional regions

    • Comparative analysis of C12orf49 binding partners across species

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing C12orf49 knockout phenotypes in chicken cells?

For analyzing C12orf49 knockout phenotypes in chicken cells, the following statistical approaches are recommended:

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Use multiple independent knockout clones (minimum 3)

    • Include appropriate controls (wild-type, empty vector)

    • Perform rescue experiments to confirm specificity

    • Account for potential off-target effects

  • Statistical methods by data type:

    Data TypeStatistical ApproachConsiderations
    Gene expression (qPCR)ANOVA with post-hoc testsLog-transform data if not normally distributed
    Protein levels (Western blot)t-tests or ANOVANormalize to appropriate loading controls
    Cell viability assaysSurvival analysisConsider time-dependent effects
    Lipid measurementsANOVA or non-parametric testsAccount for potential non-normal distribution
    High-dimensional dataPCA or clustering analysisAppropriate for transcriptomics/proteomics
  • Multiple testing correction:

    • Apply Benjamini-Hochberg or Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons

    • Consider false discovery rate control for genome-wide studies

  • Effect size reporting:

    • Include fold-change values alongside p-values

    • Report confidence intervals when possible

    • Use standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d) for cross-study comparison

  • Power analysis:

    • Conduct a priori power analysis to determine sample size

    • Typically aim for 80% power at α = 0.05

    • Consider biological significance alongside statistical significance

How can researchers differentiate between direct and indirect effects of Chicken C12orf49 homolog on lipid metabolism?

Differentiating between direct and indirect effects of chicken C12orf49 homolog on lipid metabolism requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Temporal analysis:

    • Use inducible knockout/knockdown systems to monitor immediate versus delayed effects

    • Perform time-course experiments after C12orf49 depletion to establish sequence of events

    • Monitor acute changes in SREBP processing versus long-term adaptations

  • Mechanistic dissection:

    • Direct effects: Immediate disruption of MBTPS1-dependent SREBP processing

    • Indirect effects: Secondary changes in gene expression or cellular metabolism

  • Domain-specific perturbation:

    • Generate mutations in specific domains (e.g., DUF2054) to disrupt particular functions

    • Use domain-swapping experiments to isolate functional regions

  • Complementary approaches:

    • Proximity labeling to identify direct interactors

    • Rescue experiments with constitutively active SREBP to bypass processing

    • Comparative analysis with MBTPS1 knockout to identify shared versus unique effects

How might the study of Chicken C12orf49 homolog contribute to understanding avian-specific lipid metabolism?

The study of chicken C12orf49 homolog offers unique insights into avian-specific lipid metabolism:

  • Avian-specific metabolic adaptations:

    • Birds have distinct lipid metabolism related to egg production

    • Avian liver is the primary site of lipogenesis (unlike mammals where adipose tissue plays a major role)

    • Unique regulatory mechanisms exist for mobilizing lipids during migration and reproduction

  • Research opportunities:

    • Comparative analysis of C12orf49 function in liver versus adipose tissue in chickens

    • Examination of sex-specific differences related to egg production

    • Investigation of seasonal variations in C12orf49 expression and function

    • Analysis of C12orf49's role in yolk formation and deposition

  • Potential discoveries:

    AspectResearch FocusPotential Impact
    Egg productionC12orf49's role in yolk lipid synthesisImproved understanding of reproductive biology
    Flight capabilityMetabolism during extended migrationInsights into extreme metabolic adaptations
    Species diversityC12orf49 variation across avian speciesEvolutionary insights into metabolic adaptation
    Domestic chicken breedsC12orf49 variants in different breedsAgricultural applications
  • Translational relevance:

    • Birds as models for understanding metabolic disorders

    • Insights into evolutionary divergence of lipid regulation

    • Agricultural applications for improved egg production

What are the most promising future research directions for understanding the molecular function of C12orf49 homologs?

Several promising research directions for understanding the molecular function of C12orf49 homologs include:

  • Structural biology approaches:

    • Crystal or cryo-EM structure of the DUF2054 domain

    • Structural analysis of C12orf49-MBTPS1 complex

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of protein-protein interactions

  • Comprehensive interactome mapping:

    • Proximity labeling combined with mass spectrometry

    • Identification of additional binding partners beyond MBTPS1

    • Comparison of interactomes across species

  • Detailed mechanistic studies:

    • Precise role in enhancing MBTPS1 activity

    • Potential regulatory post-translational modifications

    • Investigation of potential enzyme activity within the DUF2054 domain

  • Evolutionary studies:

    • Functional analysis of C12orf49 in species lacking SREBP

    • Investigation of additional roles in lower organisms

    • Comparative genomics across vertebrate and invertebrate species

How can researchers leverage cross-species conservation of C12orf49 for comparative studies?

Researchers can leverage the cross-species conservation of C12orf49 for comparative studies through several strategic approaches:

  • Phylogenetic analysis framework:

    • Construct comprehensive phylogenetic trees of C12orf49 homologs

    • Identify regions under purifying versus diversifying selection

    • Correlate sequence divergence with functional differences

    • Map species-specific insertions/deletions to functional domains

  • Complementation studies:

    • Express homologs from different species in knockout cellular models

    • Assess the ability to rescue SREBP processing defects

    • Identify species-specific functional constraints

    • Create chimeric proteins to map functional domains

  • Comparative expression analysis:

    SpeciesTissue DistributionDevelopmental RegulationMetabolic Responsiveness
    HumanBroad, highest in liverStable in adult tissuesResponsive to sterol levels
    MouseSimilar to humanDevelopmental changesSimilar to human
    ChickenPredicted broad expressionPotential egg-laying regulationLikely sterol-responsive
    ZebrafishBroad expressionCritical in developmentResponsive to dietary lipids
  • Model organism comparative advantages:

    • Chickens: Avian-specific metabolism, egg production

    • Zebrafish: Developmental studies, in vivo lipid processing

    • Mice: Mammalian model, genetic tools availability

    • Cell culture: Mechanistic studies, high-throughput approaches

  • Evolutionary insights:

    • Investigation of C12orf49 in species lacking SREBP orthologs

    • Analysis of co-evolution with MBTPS1 and other pathway components

    • Examination of C12orf49 in species with specialized lipid metabolism

What are the key considerations for researchers beginning work with Chicken C12orf49 homolog?

Researchers beginning work with chicken C12orf49 homolog should consider several key factors:

  • Experimental system selection:

    • Primary chicken hepatocytes provide physiologically relevant context but are challenging to maintain

    • Immortalized chicken cell lines offer convenience but may have altered metabolism

    • In vivo models (embryos, chickens) provide whole-organism context but increase complexity

  • Technical considerations:

    • Limited availability of chicken-specific reagents may require validation of cross-reactive tools

    • Need for appropriate controls when using antibodies developed against mammalian proteins

    • Potential requirement for custom tools (antibodies, constructs) specific to chicken C12orf49

  • Methodological priorities:

    • Verification of subcellular localization to the Golgi apparatus

    • Confirmation of interaction with chicken MBTPS1

    • Establishment of knockout/knockdown models

    • Characterization of effects on SREBP processing

  • Collaborative opportunities:

    • Partner with poultry research institutions

    • Leverage expertise in avian metabolism

    • Combine resources with mammalian C12orf49 researchers

    • Integrate with broader lipid metabolism research community

How should research findings on C12orf49 homologs be integrated into the broader understanding of metabolic regulation?

Research findings on C12orf49 homologs should be integrated into the broader understanding of metabolic regulation through:

  • Contextual framework:

    • Position C12orf49 within the established SREBP processing pathway

    • Connect findings to broader lipid homeostasis mechanisms

    • Consider species-specific adaptations versus core conserved functions

    • Relate to other Golgi-localized regulatory proteins

  • Translational connections:

    Research AreaIntegration ApproachPotential Impact
    Human diseaseLink to hyperlipidemia findingsBiomarker or therapeutic target development
    Agricultural scienceApplication to poultry researchImproved egg production, meat quality
    Comparative metabolismCross-species analysisEvolutionary insights
    Systems biologyNetwork modelingComprehensive pathway understanding
  • Knowledge dissemination strategy:

    • Publication in both specialized (protein science, lipid research) and broader (general biochemistry) journals

    • Data sharing through appropriate repositories

    • Integration with existing pathway databases

    • Development of educational resources on lipid metabolism regulation

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.