Note: While we will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize development of your specified tag.
APOBEC3G is a cytidine deaminase that edits cytosines to uracils in single-stranded DNA. It has dual functions in cellular biology: serving as a potent nucleic acid editor in innate immunity and playing a significant role in DNA repair processes. In its antiviral capacity, APOBEC3G targets retroviruses like HIV and SIV, editing cytosines to uracils in the minus strand DNA during reverse transcription, resulting in guanine-to-adenine hypermutation in the viral DNA coding strand . Beyond antiviral activity, APOBEC3G promotes the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting a broader role in maintaining genomic integrity .
APOBEC3G expression has been documented across multiple tissue types relevant to both reproductive biology and immune function. Expression is particularly notable in testes, ovary, spleen, peripheral blood leukocytes, and T-lymphocytes . This tissue distribution pattern aligns with APOBEC3G's dual roles in protecting germline cells from retrotransposition events and defending immune cells from retroviral infection. For research applications, it's important to consider this expression pattern when selecting appropriate cell lines for in vitro studies of APOBEC3G function.
APOBEC3G's antiviral mechanism operates through a multi-step process:
The protein is packaged within newly formed virions during viral assembly
APOBEC3G is delivered into new host cells along with the viral genome
During reverse transcription, it catalyzes the deamination of cytosines to uracils in the minus strand DNA copied from the viral RNA
This results in extensive G-to-A hypermutation in the plus strand (protein-coding) of viral DNA
The antiviral effect may manifest through two potential mechanisms: either the introduced mutations directly reduce viral fitness by altering protein-coding sequences, or the uracil-containing viral DNA becomes targeted for destruction by cellular DNA repair pathways . Experimental designs seeking to evaluate APOBEC3G's antiviral potency should therefore incorporate assays measuring both mutation frequency and viral infectivity.
For detecting and studying APOBEC3G in research applications, several validated methodologies are available:
Western Blotting: Anti-APOBEC3G/A3G antibodies, such as the rabbit recombinant monoclonal antibody [EPR25404-59], can be used at a 1/1000 dilution in 5% NFDM/TBST buffer with expected exposure times around 180 seconds .
Immunoprecipitation (IP): Validated antibodies can effectively immunoprecipitate APOBEC3G from complex protein mixtures .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC-P): Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples can be analyzed for APOBEC3G expression patterns in tissues .
Mass Spectrometry: For quantitative proteomics approaches, APOBEC3G can be detected and quantified across experimental conditions, as demonstrated in radiation response studies .
When selecting antibodies, researchers should note specificity characteristics; for example, some antibodies (like EPR25404-59) are confirmed not to cross-react with human APOBEC3A or APOBEC3B, which is crucial for experimental specificity .
APOBEC3G's role in double-strand break (DSB) repair represents a significant function beyond its established antiviral activity. Transgenic mice expressing A3G demonstrate remarkable survival following lethal irradiation compared to wild-type controls, indicating a protective effect against radiation-induced DNA damage .
To experimentally investigate this function, researchers have employed several methodologies:
Plasmid-based DSB repair assays: Using stably-transfected exogenous plasmids bearing ISce1 restriction enzyme sites, researchers can induce controlled DSBs in cell populations expressing wild-type A3G or deamination-defective mutants (e.g., A3G-W285A and A3G-E259Q). The accuracy of repair can then be assessed through PCR amplification and high-throughput sequencing of the rejoined fragments .
Proteomic analysis post-irradiation: Mass spectrometry comparing A3G-expressing cells with A3G-deficient controls at defined time points after irradiation (e.g., 0, 3, and 8 hours) reveals differential protein expression patterns associated with DNA repair pathways .
Principal Component Analysis: Statistical approaches like PCA can quantify global trends in proteomic changes, revealing A3G-dependent differences in cellular responses to DNA damage .
Importantly, research indicates that A3G not only accelerates DSB repair but specifically promotes deamination-dependent error-free rejoining, suggesting a direct enzymatic role in the repair process rather than just a scaffolding function .
Following DNA damage, particularly from ionizing radiation, APOBEC3G expression is associated with the rapid accumulation of proteins involved in various DNA repair pathways. Proteomic analysis has identified 279 proteins that are significantly upregulated in A3G-expressing cells within 3 hours post-irradiation .
The major pathways and protein interactions include:
| ID number | Pathway description | Observed gene count | Background gene count | False discovery rate | Key proteins involved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSA-5685938 | HDR through Single Strand Annealing (SSA) | 8 | 36 | 7.27E-05 | BLM, ERCC1, ERCC4, KAT5, NBN, RAD50, TOP3A, TOPBP1 |
| HSA-73894 | DNA Repair | 19 | 290 | 7.27E-05 | ASCC1, BLM, CCNA2, DDB2, ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, ERCC5, EYA3, FANCD2, KAT5, NBN, PARP1, RAD23A, RAD50, RAD51C, TOP3A, TOPBP1, XRCC4 |
| HSA-5693532 | DNA Double-Strand Break Repair | 13 | 147 | 1.10E-04 | BLM, CCNA2, ERCC1, ERCC4, EYA3, KAT5, NBN, PARP1, RAD50, RAD51C, TOP3A, TOPBP1, XRCC4 |
| HSA-3108214 | SUMOylation of DNA damage response and repair proteins | 9 | 69 | 2.50E-04 | AAAS, BLM, NDNL2, NSMCE1, NSMCE4A, NUP107, PARP1, SMC6, XRCC4 |
| HSA-5693538 | Homology Directed Repair | 11 | 119 | 3.20E-04 | BLM, CCNA2, ERCC1, ERCC4, KAT5, NBN, PARP1, RAD50, RAD51C, TOP3A, TOPBP1 |
The most significantly enriched KEGG pathway was HSA 03440-Homologous Recombination (HR), highlighting key proteins including BLM, NBN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD54B, TOP3A, and TOPBP1 . These interactions suggest that APOBEC3G functions as a mediator of the DSB response by promoting the protein-level induction of DNA damage repair genes to facilitate accurate end-joining following DSB induction.
The N-terminal domain (NTD) of APOBEC3G plays a critical role in its functional interactions, particularly with nucleic acids. Structural studies employing homology modeling based on NMR structures have revealed surface characteristics that influence binding propensities with RNA and DNA .
Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) simulations using the ESPResSo package have been employed to study these interactions. In these models, amino acid and nucleotide residues are represented as single beads with fixed protein structures. A soft core potential is introduced between protein and nucleotides to prevent nucleotides from entering the core region of the protein .
The binding propensity (BP) of amino acids serves as an additional contact potential for sampling reliable nucleic acid binding conformations:
RNA binding propensities are predicted by a counterpart network model based on RNA-binding proteins
DNA binding propensities are predicted by an artificial neural network model based on DNA-binding proteins
Experimental validation of computational predictions involves analyzing the distribution of binding propensities across multiple models. For example, selected residues from the APOBEC3G structure demonstrate varying binding propensities that correlate with their functional roles in RNA association or protein-protein interactions (such as with HIV Vif protein) .
APOBEC3G shows evidence of ancient adaptive evolution that significantly predates the emergence of modern lentiviruses like HIV. This evolutionary history provides important context for understanding the protein's biological significance .
The gene responsible for differential susceptibility to HIV infection among human cell lines was identified as APOBEC3G, but its evolutionary history suggests it evolved to counter much older viral threats . This observation implies that RNA/DNA editing represents an ancient defense mechanism against retroviral elements.
Analysis of APOBEC3G across primate species reveals patterns of positive selection indicative of an evolutionary "arms race" between host restriction factors and viral countermeasures. The fact that this selective pressure existed long before HIV emerged in human populations suggests APOBEC3G evolved against ancestral retroviruses or endogenous retroviral elements .
For researchers, this evolutionary perspective is crucial when designing comparative studies or when using APOBEC3G from different species as research models. The functional conservation across species should be considered alongside species-specific adaptations that may influence experimental outcomes.
APOBEC3G's dual functionality suggests two distinct therapeutic approaches with potentially significant clinical implications:
Enhancing radioresistance: Transgenic mice expressing APOBEC3G successfully survived lethal irradiation, whereas wild-type controls quickly succumbed to radiation syndrome . This finding suggests that enhancing APOBEC3G activity could potentially reduce acute radiation syndrome in individuals exposed to ionizing radiation, which has applications in radiation protection during medical treatments, nuclear accidents, or space travel.
Improving cancer therapy: Conversely, strategies aimed at inhibiting APOBEC3G may improve the efficacy of genotoxic therapies used to treat malignant tumors . By suppressing DNA repair mechanisms in cancer cells, APOBEC3G inhibition could potentially sensitize tumors to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents.
Researchers investigating these applications should consider the molecular mechanisms by which APOBEC3G promotes deamination-dependent error-free rejoining of DNA breaks. This process involves the differential upregulation of proteins in multiple DNA repair pathways, including homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and nucleotide excision repair (NER) . Understanding these pathways is essential for developing targeted approaches that modulate APOBEC3G activity in specific clinical contexts.
When studying APOBEC3G in cellular systems, researchers should implement several critical controls and validations:
Deamination-defective mutants: Include APOBEC3G mutants such as A3G-W285A and A3G-E259Q alongside wild-type A3G to differentiate between deamination-dependent and deamination-independent effects . These controls are particularly important when investigating the role of APOBEC3G in DNA repair processes.
Expression verification: Confirm APOBEC3G expression through techniques such as western blotting or mass spectrometry throughout the experimental timeframe. This is especially important in time-course experiments, where protein expression may change in response to stimuli .
Antibody specificity validation: When using antibodies for APOBEC3G detection, verify there is no cross-reactivity with related APOBEC family members (particularly APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B) . This specificity is crucial for accurately attributing observed effects to APOBEC3G rather than other cytidine deaminases.
Cell line selection: Consider the endogenous expression of APOBEC3G in selected cell lines. Some human cell lines naturally vary in their susceptibility to HIV infection due to differential APOBEC3G expression , which could impact experimental outcomes if not accounted for.
Computational approaches offer powerful tools for understanding APOBEC3G's complex structure-function relationships:
Homology modeling: Generating homology models based on NMR structures provides insights into APOBEC3G domain structures and surface characteristics that influence functional interactions . These models can be particularly valuable for regions where crystallographic data is unavailable.
Coarse-grained molecular dynamics: Simulations that represent amino acids and nucleotides as single beads can efficiently sample possible conformations of APOBEC3G-nucleic acid complexes . This approach can identify potential binding sites and interaction modes that might be difficult to capture experimentally.
Binding propensity prediction: Neural network models and counterpart network models can predict the binding propensity of amino acids for RNA or DNA interactions . These predictions can guide experimental design by identifying residues likely to be involved in nucleic acid binding.
Clustering analysis: Progressive clustering of simulation snapshots helps identify predominant interaction modes between APOBEC3G and nucleic acids . By analyzing contact frequencies across multiple clusters, researchers can determine which amino acids are most consistently involved in binding.
Proteomic data integration: Principal components analysis and pathway enrichment analysis of proteomic data can reveal how APOBEC3G expression influences cellular response networks following DNA damage . These approaches can identify novel functional connections that might not be apparent from targeted experimental approaches.
Detection of APOBEC3G activity requires optimized conditions tailored to specific experimental objectives:
Western blotting conditions: For protein detection, use anti-APOBEC3G antibodies at 1/1000 dilution in 5% NFDM/TBST buffer with approximately 180 seconds exposure time . This protocol has been validated for detecting human APOBEC3G without cross-reactivity to related proteins APOBEC3A or APOBEC3B.
DSB repair assays: To study APOBEC3G's role in DNA repair, the use of plasmids containing I-SceI restriction sites allows for controlled induction of double-strand breaks. PCR amplification and high-throughput sequencing (generating 10^5-10^6 reads per sample) of the regions surrounding the break site can quantify repair accuracy .
Radiation response studies: When investigating APOBEC3G's role in radiation protection, examining cellular proteomes at specific time points (0, 3, and 8 hours post-irradiation) captures the dynamic changes in protein expression . Mass spectrometry approaches can detect APOBEC3G itself as well as associated changes in DNA repair protein networks.
Nucleic acid binding studies: For investigating APOBEC3G interactions with DNA or RNA, computational simulations should distribute 100 non-specific 5-mer nucleic acid molecules randomly around the protein model. Analysis of 10,000 snapshots grouped by progressive clustering (using 10Å as a threshold) can identify predominant binding modes .
Distinguishing between APOBEC3G's deaminase activity and its DNA repair functions requires specialized experimental approaches:
Despite substantial progress in understanding APOBEC3G, several critical questions remain unanswered that represent important opportunities for future research:
Mechanism of repair promotion: While APOBEC3G is known to promote DNA double-strand break repair, the precise mechanism by which its deaminase activity facilitates accurate repair remains incompletely understood . Future research could investigate whether APOBEC3G-mediated deamination creates specific DNA structures or modifications that recruit repair factors.
Evolutionary conservation of repair function: Whether APOBEC3G's DNA repair function is conserved across species and whether it evolved alongside or independently of its antiviral function remains unclear . Comparative studies across species could provide insights into the evolutionary history of these dual functions.
Therapeutic targeting approaches: While inhibiting APOBEC3G might improve cancer radiotherapy and enhancing it could protect against radiation damage, specific approaches to modulate its activity in a targeted manner have not been fully developed . Research into small molecule modulators of APOBEC3G activity could address this gap.
Structural basis of nucleic acid selectivity: Although structural studies have provided insights into binding propensities, the complete structural basis for APOBEC3G's selectivity between different types of nucleic acids (viral RNA, viral DNA, cellular DNA) is not fully elucidated . Advanced structural studies combining experimental and computational approaches could further clarify these interactions.