The recombinant EF-Tu (CAUR_2597) is produced in E. coli systems, with the following specifications:
Storage: Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol; stable for 6 months at -80°C .
Enzymatic Activity: Recombinant EF-Tu retains GTPase activity, critical for its role in translation. Structural studies suggest tetrameric assembly potential, though C. aurantiacus EF-Tu typically functions as a monomer .
Research Use:
Gene Localization: The tuf gene is part of the str operon in C. aurantiacus, co-transcribed with fusA (encoding elongation factor G) .
Conservation: EF-Tu sequences in Chloroflexi share >40% identity with homologs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Streptomyces coelicolor, reflecting ancient evolutionary conservation .
Post-Translational Modifications: Potential biotinylation or phosphorylation sites in the non-conserved regions remain uncharacterized .
Extracellular Roles: The relevance of EF-Tu’s moonlighting functions in C. aurantiacus’s environmental adaptation (e.g., microbial mat formation) requires further study .
KEGG: cau:Caur_2182
STRING: 324602.Caur_2367
For optimal stability and activity retention of Recombinant C. aurantiacus Elongation factor Tu, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines:
Storage Recommendations:
Short-term storage (up to one week): 4°C
Standard storage: -20°C
Extended storage: -20°C to -80°C
Handling Protocol:
When receiving lyophilized protein, briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect all material at the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being standard practice)
Prepare small working aliquots to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Store aliquots at recommended temperatures
The shelf life varies depending on formulation:
Liquid form: approximately 6 months at -20°C/-80°C
Lyophilized form: approximately 12 months at -20°C/-80°C
IMPORTANT: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly reduce protein stability and activity. Researchers should track the number of freeze-thaw cycles each aliquot undergoes and discard samples after 3-5 cycles for most reliable results .
Chloroflexus aurantiacus occupies a fascinating position in the evolutionary history of photosynthetic organisms. As a member of the Chloroflexi phylum, it represents one of the earliest diverging photosynthetic bacterial lineages.
The unique features that distinguish C. aurantiacus in evolutionary context include:
Photosynthetic apparatus characteristics: Contains a type II reaction center similar to purple bacteria, but with distinctive modifications. The M-subunit of the reaction center consists of 306 amino acid residues with a blocked N-terminus and replacement of a histidine (that normally coordinates magnesium of an accessory bacteriochlorophyll in purple bacteria) with leucine .
Novel electron transfer mechanisms: Possesses a unique multi-subunit membrane-bound electron transfer complex containing seven subunits, two of which are c-type cytochromes. This complex functionally replaces the cytochrome bc or bf complex found in many other photosynthetic organisms .
Metabolic versatility: Capable of photoheterotrophic, photoautotrophic, and chemoheterotrophic growth, suggesting an adaptable metabolism that may reflect early evolutionary strategies.
These characteristics make C. aurantiacus an excellent model organism for studying the evolution of photosynthesis and electron transfer mechanisms. The distinct features of its proteins, including Elongation factor Tu, may reflect adaptations to its thermophilic lifestyle and unique evolutionary position .
Based on current research protocols, the recommended expression system for producing Recombinant C. aurantiacus Elongation factor Tu is a yeast-based system. This methodological approach offers several advantages for this specific protein:
Expression System Details:
Host organism: Yeast (specific strain optimization may be required)
Target protein: Full-length (1-401 amino acids) Elongation factor Tu
Expected purity: >85% by SDS-PAGE analysis
Product identity: Verified by mass spectrometry or Western blotting
Methodological Workflow:
Gene synthesis or amplification from C. aurantiacus genomic DNA
Cloning into appropriate yeast expression vector
Transformation and selection of high-expressing clones
Optimization of induction conditions
Purification via affinity chromatography (tag-specific)
Quality control testing
While yeast is the documented expression system, researchers may consider alternative systems based on specific experimental requirements:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast | Post-translational modifications, proper folding | Longer production time | Full-length, active protein |
| E. coli | Rapid expression, high yields | Potential folding issues | Structural studies, domains |
| Insect cells | Complex folding capability | More complex setup | Functional studies |
The choice of expression system should be guided by the intended application, with yeast being preferred when native-like protein conformation and potential post-translational modifications are important .
The assessment of GTPase activity is crucial for functional characterization of Recombinant C. aurantiacus Elongation factor Tu. A comprehensive methodological approach should include multiple complementary assays:
Malachite Green Phosphate Assay Protocol:
Prepare reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl₂, 100 mM KCl)
Combine 1-5 μM purified EF-Tu with 50-200 μM GTP
Incubate at both standard (37°C) and thermophilic (55°C) conditions
At timed intervals, withdraw aliquots and terminate reactions with malachite green reagent
Measure absorbance at 650 nm and calculate released phosphate against standards
HPLC Nucleotide Analysis:
Set up reactions as above
Quench with EDTA at predetermined timepoints
Analyze GTP/GDP ratios by reversed-phase HPLC
Integrate peak areas to determine reaction progression
Temperature and pH Optimization:
For thermophilic EF-Tu from C. aurantiacus, systematic optimization is essential:
| Temperature (°C) | Relative Activity (%) | pH | Relative Activity (%) | [Mg²⁺] (mM) | Relative Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 20-30 | 6.5 | 50-60 | 5 | 60-70 |
| 40 | 50-60 | 7.0 | 80-90 | 10 | 90-100 |
| 50 | 80-90 | 7.5 | 95-100 | 15 | 80-90 |
| 60 | 90-100 | 8.0 | 70-80 | 20 | 70-80 |
| 70 | 60-70 | 8.5 | 40-50 | 25 | 50-60 |
Real-time Kinetics via Fluorescence:
Employ fluorescent GTP analogs (mant-GTP)
Monitor binding and hydrolysis through fluorescence changes
Determine kon and koff rates for nucleotide interactions
Control Experiments:
Negative control: Heat-denatured EF-Tu
Positive control: E. coli EF-Tu with established kinetic parameters
Specificity control: ATP versus GTP substrate preference
This methodological framework allows researchers to comprehensively characterize the GTPase activity of C. aurantiacus EF-Tu and compare it with homologs from other bacterial species, particularly with respect to thermostability and temperature optima.
As a protein from a thermophilic organism, C. aurantiacus Elongation factor Tu exhibits distinctive thermostability properties compared to mesophilic homologs. A systematic investigation reveals both the extent and mechanisms of this enhanced stability:
Comparative Thermal Stability Assessment:
Experimental approaches for quantitative comparison include:
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to determine melting temperatures (Tm)
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to monitor secondary structure loss
Activity retention assays following thermal challenge
| Organism | Growth Temperature | EF-Tu Tm Value | Activity Half-life at 60°C |
|---|---|---|---|
| C. aurantiacus | 50-60°C | ~75-85°C (estimated) | Hours |
| E. coli | 37°C | ~45-55°C | Minutes |
| T. thermophilus | 65-70°C | ~80-90°C | Days |
Structural Features Contributing to Thermostability:
Analysis of the amino acid sequence reveals several thermoadaptive features:
Electrostatic Interactions: Increased proportion of charged residues (Arg, Lys, Glu, Asp) forming stabilizing salt bridges
Hydrophobic Core: Enhanced hydrophobic packing through higher proportion of branched amino acids
Loop Stabilization: Strategic proline residues in loop regions reducing conformational entropy
Thermolabile Residue Reduction: Lower content of asparagine and glutamine that are prone to deamidation at high temperatures
Surface Features: Potential reduction in surface loop length and increased surface hydrophilicity
Methodological Approaches for Structure-Stability Relationships:
Homology modeling based on known EF-Tu structures
Molecular dynamics simulations at various temperatures
Site-directed mutagenesis targeting putative stabilizing residues
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to determine precise structural features
Understanding these thermostability mechanisms has significant implications beyond basic science, including potential applications in:
Protein engineering for enhanced thermostability
Development of heat-resistant translation systems for biotechnology
Insight into evolutionary strategies for adaptation to extreme environments
The intersection between Elongation factor Tu function and C. aurantiacus' distinctive photosynthetic apparatus presents an intriguing research area. While EF-Tu's primary role in translation is conserved, its activity may be specifically adapted to support the organism's unique energy metabolism:
Integration with Photosynthetic Machinery:
C. aurantiacus possesses a photosynthetic reaction center with distinctive features compared to purple bacteria, including a modified M-subunit with a blocked N-terminus and replacement of a conserved histidine with leucine . EF-Tu's role in this context includes:
Translation of photosynthetic proteins with appropriate efficiency and accuracy
Potential coordinated regulation with light-harvesting systems
Adaptation to expression needs across different growth modes (photoheterotrophic vs. chemoheterotrophic)
Connection to Novel Electron Transfer Complexes:
C. aurantiacus contains a unique seven-subunit membrane-bound electron transfer complex that functionally replaces the cytochrome bc or bf complex found in other photosynthetic organisms . This suggests:
Requirements for specialized translation of these novel components
Potential co-evolution of translation machinery with electron transfer innovations
Adaptation to the energy demands of protein synthesis in a thermophilic phototroph
Methodological Approaches to Investigate These Relationships:
Comparative proteomics under different growth conditions to correlate EF-Tu abundance with photosynthetic components
Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency of photosynthesis-related mRNAs
Analysis of tuf1 gene expression regulation in response to light and redox state
Co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify potential regulatory interactions
This integration of fundamental translation processes with specialized energy metabolism represents an important aspect of C. aurantiacus' evolutionary adaptation to its ecological niche, combining thermophilic lifestyle with photosynthetic capabilities.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact protein function, and their investigation in C. aurantiacus EF-Tu requires a multi-faceted methodological approach:
Mass Spectrometry-Based PTM Mapping:
Sample preparation: Purify recombinant protein to >95% homogeneity
Enzymatic digestion: Multiple proteases (trypsin, chymotrypsin, Glu-C) for comprehensive sequence coverage
LC-MS/MS analysis: High-resolution instruments with various fragmentation methods (HCD, ETD)
Bioinformatic analysis: Search algorithms allowing for variable modifications
PTM-Specific Enrichment Strategies:
| PTM Type | Enrichment Method | Detection Approach | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | TiO₂ or IMAC | Neutral loss scanning | Lambda phosphatase treatment |
| Methylation | Antibody-based | Diagnostic fragment ions | Synthetic methylated peptides |
| Acetylation | Anti-acetyl lysine antibodies | Diagnostic mass shift | HDAC treatment |
| Glycosylation | Lectin affinity | Glycosidase treatment | PNGase F digestion |
Functional Impact Assessment:
Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues
Comparative activity assays (GTP hydrolysis, tRNA binding)
Structural studies comparing modified and unmodified forms
In vivo studies correlating modification state with growth conditions
Context-Specific Analysis:
Compare PTM profiles under different growth conditions:
Different temperatures (30°C vs. 55°C)
Light vs. dark growth
Aerobic vs. anaerobic conditions
Quantitative PTM analysis using stable isotope labeling
PTM crosstalk analysis for multiple modifications
This comprehensive approach would provide insights into how PTMs might modulate EF-Tu function in response to environmental conditions, potentially contributing to C. aurantiacus' adaptation to its thermophilic photosynthetic lifestyle.
Elucidating the three-dimensional structure of C. aurantiacus EF-Tu requires careful selection and optimization of structural biology techniques. A comprehensive methodological framework includes:
This multi-technique approach allows researchers to capture both the static architecture and dynamic properties of C. aurantiacus EF-Tu, providing insights into its function in protein synthesis and potential adaptations to thermophilic conditions.
The interaction between EF-Tu and other components of the translation machinery in C. aurantiacus may reveal adaptations specific to this thermophilic photosynthetic organism. A comprehensive investigation requires:
Binding Partner Identification:
Pull-down assays using tagged recombinant EF-Tu
Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS)
Yeast two-hybrid or bacterial two-hybrid screening
Comparative interactome analysis with mesophilic EF-Tu homologs
Quantitative Binding Assays:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or bio-layer interferometry (BLI)
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) for solution-based measurements
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
Fluorescence anisotropy for labeled ligands
Functional Translation Assays:
Reconstituted in vitro translation system using C. aurantiacus components
Single-molecule FRET to monitor EF-Tu dynamics during translation
Ribosome binding and GTPase activation assays
Temperature-dependent activity measurements
Structural Studies of Complexes:
Cryo-EM of ribosome-EF-Tu-tRNA complexes
Crystallization of EF-Tu with binding partners
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map interaction surfaces
Computational docking validated by mutagenesis
Temperature-Dependent Interaction Analysis:
| Temperature | Association Rate (kon) | Dissociation Rate (koff) | Affinity (KD) | ΔG | ΔH | TΔS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25°C | Baseline | Baseline | Baseline | Baseline | Baseline | Baseline |
| 37°C | ↑ | ↑ | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable |
| 55°C | ↑↑ | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable |
| 65°C | Variable | ↑↑↑ | Variable | Variable | Variable | Variable |
This systematic approach would reveal how C. aurantiacus EF-Tu has adapted to function optimally at elevated temperatures and in the context of photosynthetic metabolism, potentially identifying unique features that distinguish it from mesophilic homologs.