SecA is a complex protein consisting of six characterized domains that enable it to bind substrates and facilitate their movement .
DEAD motor domain: Subdivided into two nucleotide-binding folds (NBF1 and NBF2), this domain binds and hydrolyzes ATP. The energy derived from ATP hydrolysis results in conformational changes that mechanically move the preprotein across the membrane.
Helical Scaffold Domain (HSD): Located in the center of the SecA protomer, the HSD interacts with all other subdomains via α-helical interactions and contains the intramolecular regulator of ATP hydrolysis 1 (IRA1) subdomain.
Helical Wing Domain (HWD): Situated at the C-terminal portion, this domain interacts with the HSD and PPXD domains, playing a role in transferring molecular conformational motion originating from ATP hydrolysis to the PPXD domain.
Peptide Cross-linking Domain (PPXD): This domain binds preproteins, which is essential for SecA's function in transporting proteins across the membrane.
C-terminal Linker Domain: Facilitates binding to the SecB chaperone during post-translational translocation, the ribosome during both post-translational and co-translational translocation, and the phospholipid bilayer.
SecA's primary function is to translocate proteins across the bacterial cell membrane . It interacts with the SecYEG complex to facilitate this process, utilizing ATP hydrolysis to drive the movement of preproteins . SecA functions as a monomer during protein translocation in vivo .
SecA homologs in thermophilic bacteria possess unique sequence features, such as conserved signature inserts (CSIs), which may contribute to the protein's stability at high temperatures . These CSIs are located in a surface-exposed region within the ATPase domain of SecA . One CSI, consisting of a 50 amino acid insert, is found in SecA homologs from the orders Thermotogales and Aquificales, while a 76 amino acid insert is specific to the order Thermales and Hydrogenibacillus schlegelii .
Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the 50 amino acid CSI stabilizes ADP/ATP binding, which is essential for SecA function . The surface-exposed CSIs may also enable novel protein-protein interactions, enhancing the thermostability of SecA .
SecA's role in protein translocation makes it a potential target for antibiotic development . The structural similarities between the active SecA–SecY complex and other protein translocation systems targeted by antibiotics suggest that SecA inhibitors could be effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria .
Chromobacterium violaceum is a bacterium known for producing violacein . Proteomic analysis of C. violaceum has been conducted to understand its adaptability to different stresses . While SecA is vital for protein secretion in bacteria, research indicates that antibiotic-induced stress in Chromobacterium violaceum influences violacein production, linking protein translocation processes with the bacterium's stress response .
KEGG: cvi:CV_4281
STRING: 243365.CV_4281
SecA in C. violaceum, like in other bacteria, functions as an essential ATPase that mediates the translocation of proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. It works in conjunction with the integral membrane proteins SecYEG, which form the protein-conducting channel in the membrane . In bacteria, SecA recognizes secretory proteins either directly or through secondary recognition via molecular chaperones that deliver proteins to SecA. The protein substrates are then screened for functional signal sequences by SecYEG and subsequently translocated across the membrane in an ATP-dependent process .
As C. violaceum is an opportunistic pathogen with high virulence in humans , its SecA likely plays a critical role in the secretion of virulence factors and other proteins essential for pathogenicity and survival in various environments.
While specific structural data for C. violaceum SecA is limited in the available literature, bacterial SecA proteins generally share conserved structural features that can be inferred for C. violaceum SecA:
Two nucleotide-binding domains (NBD-1 and NBD-2) that form the interface for ATPase activity
A polypeptide crosslinking domain (PPXD) that contacts substrate proteins during translocation
An α-helical scaffold domain (HSD) containing a two-helix finger (2HF) that plays a critical role in protein translocation
A C-terminal tail (CTT) that may include a zinc-binding domain (ZnBD) in some species
Given that C. violaceum belongs to the Betaproteobacteria within the Neisseriaceae family , its SecA structure may have unique characteristics compared to the well-studied E. coli SecA, warranting detailed structural analysis through methods such as X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM.
For successful expression of recombinant C. violaceum SecA, consider the following methodological approach:
Expression System Selection:
E. coli BL21(DE3) or its derivatives are typically suitable for SecA expression
Consider C41/C43 strains if toxicity issues arise with standard strains
Vector and Construct Design:
Use pET vectors with T7 promoter for high-level expression
Include a His6-tag (N- or C-terminal) for purification via nickel affinity chromatography
Consider including a TEV protease cleavage site for tag removal
Expression Protocol:
Transform expression plasmid into the selected E. coli strain
Grow cultures at 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8
Induce with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG
Reduce temperature to 16-25°C after induction and continue expression for 4-16 hours
Harvest cells by centrifugation (6,000 × g, 15 minutes, 4°C)
This approach should yield sufficient recombinant protein for downstream applications and analysis.
C. violaceum is known to be highly virulent in human infections, causing hepatic abscesses and fulminant septicemia . While direct evidence linking SecA to C. violaceum pathogenicity is not explicitly reported in the provided literature, several mechanisms can be proposed based on the known functions of SecA in other bacteria:
Secretion of Virulence Factors: SecA likely mediates the secretion of toxins, enzymes, and other virulence factors necessary for infection and host cell damage
Cell Surface Protein Display: SecA-dependent translocation could be essential for proper localization of adhesins, invasins, and other surface proteins required for host colonization
Survival Under Stress Conditions: SecA may facilitate the export of proteins required for adaptation to host environments, including stress response proteins
Interaction with Host Immune System: Through secretion of immunomodulatory proteins, SecA could indirectly contribute to immune evasion
The role of SecA in pathogenicity could be investigated using conditional knockdown approaches, as complete deletion would likely be lethal due to the essential nature of protein secretion.
Several methodological approaches can be employed to study SecA-substrate interactions:
In vitro Approaches:
Pull-down Assays: Using purified His-tagged SecA to capture potential substrate proteins from C. violaceum cell lysates
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): To determine binding kinetics between SecA and purified substrate proteins
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC): For thermodynamic analysis of binding interactions
Crosslinking Studies: Using chemical crosslinkers to capture transient interactions followed by mass spectrometry
In vivo Approaches:
Bacterial Two-Hybrid System: Adapted for studying protein-protein interactions in a bacterial context
Co-immunoprecipitation: Using antibodies against SecA to precipitate complexes from cell lysates
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): By tagging SecA and potential substrates with appropriate fluorophores
Computational Approaches:
Sequence Analysis: To identify potential signal sequences in C. violaceum proteins
Structural Modeling: Of SecA-substrate complexes based on known structures
These approaches can reveal which C. violaceum proteins interact with SecA and the nature of these interactions.
The ATPase activity of SecA is crucial for its function in protein translocation. Here's a comprehensive methodology for assessing this activity:
Coupled Enzyme Assay:
Reaction mixture containing:
50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5)
30 mM KCl
30 mM NH4Cl
5 mM Mg(OAc)2
1 mM DTT
0.5 mg/ml BSA
2 mM ATP
1 mM phosphoenolpyruvate
0.25 mM NADH
2.5 units of pyruvate kinase
2.5 units of lactate dehydrogenase
0.1-1 μM purified SecA
Monitor NADH oxidation at 340 nm over time
Calculate ATP hydrolysis rate based on the decrease in NADH absorbance
Malachite Green Assay:
Incubate SecA with ATP in appropriate buffer
Stop reaction at various time points with EDTA
Add malachite green solution to detect released phosphate
Measure absorbance at 620-650 nm
Calculate ATPase activity using a phosphate standard curve
Important Controls:
Negative control without SecA
Positive control with known functional ATPase
Addition of ATPase inhibitors to confirm specificity
Assessment of ATP hydrolysis in the presence of potential substrates or SecYEG
| Condition | Expected ATPase Activity | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Basal activity | Low | SecA alone has low intrinsic ATPase activity |
| +Lipids | Moderate increase | Membrane interaction stimulates activity |
| +Signal peptide | Significant increase | Substrate binding activates ATPase function |
| +SecYEG proteoliposomes | Highest | Full translocation system maximally activates SecA |
The interaction between SecA and SecYEG is fundamental to the translocation process. While specific data for C. violaceum is not available in the provided search results, the following approaches would be valuable for investigating this interaction:
Biochemical Approaches:
Co-purification: Express tagged versions of SecA and SecYEG components to isolate the complex
Site-directed mutagenesis: Introduce mutations in predicted interaction sites and assess the impact on binding and function
Crosslinking experiments: Use chemical or photo-crosslinkers to capture the SecA-SecYEG complex
Biophysical Approaches:
Fluorescence-based assays: Monitor FRET between labeled SecA and SecYEG components
Isothermal titration calorimetry: Determine binding thermodynamics
Surface plasmon resonance: Measure association and dissociation kinetics
Structural Approaches:
Cryo-electron microscopy: To visualize the SecA-SecYEG complex
X-ray crystallography: If the complex can be crystallized
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry: To identify regions protected upon complex formation
These approaches would provide insights into how C. violaceum SecA docks with SecYEG and facilitates protein translocation across the membrane.
Designing optimal constructs is critical for successful expression and functional analysis of SecA variants:
Full-length and Truncated Constructs:
Full-length SecA (for complete functional studies)
NBD-1 + NBD-2 (for ATPase activity studies)
PPXD domain (for substrate binding studies)
C-terminal domains (for interaction studies with SecB or other partners)
Fusion Tags Considerations:
N-terminal vs. C-terminal tags (consider potential interference with function)
Affinity tags: His6, GST, MBP (MBP may enhance solubility)
Include protease cleavage sites (TEV, PreScission, or thrombin)
Fluorescent protein fusions for localization studies (if appropriate)
Cloning Strategy:
Use codon-optimized synthetic genes for expression in E. coli
Include appropriate restriction sites for subcloning
Consider Gateway or Gibson Assembly for efficient cloning of multiple variants
Sequence verify all constructs before expression
Site-directed Mutagenesis Targets:
Walker A and B motifs in NBDs (for ATPase-deficient mutants)
Conserved residues in the PPXD domain (for substrate binding studies)
2HF region mutations (to assess translocation function)
Interface residues predicted to interact with SecYEG
This systematic approach to construct design will facilitate comprehensive structure-function analysis of C. violaceum SecA.
Purification of recombinant SecA can present several challenges. Here are the most common issues and their solutions:
Problem: Poor solubility/Inclusion body formation
Solutions:
Lower induction temperature (16-18°C)
Reduce IPTG concentration (0.1-0.2 mM)
Use solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO)
Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Add mild detergents (0.05% Triton X-100) to lysis buffer
Problem: Proteolytic degradation
Solutions:
Include protease inhibitors in all buffers
Add EDTA (1-5 mM) to chelate metal ions required by metalloproteases
Perform purification at 4°C
Reduce purification time by optimizing protocols
Consider C-terminal truncations to remove unstructured regions prone to degradation
Problem: Co-purification of nucleic acids
Solutions:
Include DNase/RNase treatment during lysis
Add high salt wash steps (500 mM NaCl)
Include polyethyleneimine precipitation step (0.1%) before affinity chromatography
Use heparin column as an additional purification step
Problem: Low activity of purified protein
Solutions:
Ensure reducing conditions are maintained (add 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)
Include stabilizing agents (10% glycerol, 100 mM KCl)
Avoid freeze-thaw cycles (aliquot and flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen)
Test different buffer systems (HEPES, Tris, phosphate) at various pH values
Recommended Purification Protocol:
Affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged protein)
Ion exchange chromatography (typically Q-Sepharose)
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing
Following these guidelines should help overcome common purification challenges.
Validating the translocation activity of SecA requires assessing its ability to drive protein transport across membranes. Here are recommended methodological approaches:
In vitro Translocation Assays:
Preparation of Components:
Purified SecA
SecYEG-containing proteoliposomes or inverted membrane vesicles
Radiolabeled or fluorescently labeled pre-protein substrates
ATP regeneration system (creatine phosphate/creatine kinase)
Assay Procedure:
Mix all components and incubate at 37°C
At defined time points, take aliquots and treat with protease (typically proteinase K)
Analyze protected (translocated) fragments by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography or fluorescence detection
Controls:
ATP-depleted condition (apyrase treatment)
SecA-depleted condition
Non-translocatable substrate (signal sequence mutant)
Real-time Fluorescence-based Assays:
Use substrates labeled with environmentally sensitive fluorophores
Monitor fluorescence changes during translocation
Calculate translocation kinetics from fluorescence data
Complementation Assays in SecA-depleted Strains:
Construct a conditional SecA-depletion strain of E. coli
Introduce plasmids expressing C. violaceum SecA
Assess growth under SecA-depleting conditions
Monitor secretion of reporter proteins
| Assay Type | Advantages | Limitations | Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|---|
| In vitro translocation | Direct measurement of function | Technical complexity | ATP concentration, temperature, ionic strength |
| Fluorescence-based | Real-time kinetics | Potential interference from labels | Fluorophore choice, background signal |
| Complementation | In vivo relevance | Indirect measurement | Expression level, growth conditions |
Combining these approaches provides comprehensive validation of SecA translocation activity.
As an essential component of the bacterial secretion machinery, SecA represents a promising target for novel antimicrobial development against C. violaceum, which is known for its multi-drug resistance characteristics similar to pseudomonas and aeromonas species . Here's a methodological framework for exploring this avenue:
Target Validation Approaches:
Demonstrate essentiality through conditional knockdown studies
Conduct structural analysis to identify unique features of C. violaceum SecA
Perform comparative analysis with human proteins to ensure specificity
Screening Methodologies:
Structure-based virtual screening:
Using solved or modeled structures of C. violaceum SecA
Focus on ATP-binding pocket or SecYEG interaction interface
Employ molecular docking with compound libraries
High-throughput biochemical assays:
ATPase inhibition assays using purified SecA
Translocation inhibition assays with reconstituted systems
Thermal shift assays to identify compounds that bind and stabilize SecA
Whole-cell screening:
Identify compounds with selective toxicity against C. violaceum
Confirm SecA as the target through resistant mutant analysis
Lead Optimization Strategies:
Structure-activity relationship studies of hit compounds
Assessment of spectrum of activity against related pathogens
Evaluation of resistance development frequency
Given C. violaceum's role as an emerging opportunistic pathogen with high virulence , developing SecA inhibitors could provide valuable new therapeutic options for these difficult-to-treat infections.
C. violaceum occupies a unique ecological niche and has evolved as both an environmental organism and an opportunistic pathogen . Studying its SecA translocase can provide several important insights:
Evolutionary Adaptations: Analyzing SecA from C. violaceum can reveal adaptations specific to its environmental lifestyle and transition to pathogenicity
Substrate Specificity: Identifying the repertoire of proteins secreted via the Sec pathway in C. violaceum can illuminate how the organism interacts with its environment and hosts
Integration with Other Secretion Systems: C. violaceum possesses two type III secretion systems (T3SSs) , and understanding how the Sec system coordinates with these specialized secretion systems could reveal novel regulatory networks
Comparison with Model Organisms: Detailed characterization of C. violaceum SecA structure and function would expand our understanding beyond the well-studied E. coli model
Biotechnological Applications: Given C. violaceum's importance in biotechnology for producing compounds like violacein , understanding its secretion mechanisms could facilitate engineered protein secretion for biotechnological purposes
This research area represents an opportunity to bridge fundamental bacterial physiology with applications in both medical and biotechnological fields.
To comprehensively investigate the structure-function relationship of C. violaceum SecA, consider the following analytical approaches:
Structural Analysis Techniques:
Functional Analysis Techniques:
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Maps regions of SecA that undergo conformational changes upon nucleotide binding
Identifies domains involved in substrate recognition
Requires careful optimization of exchange and quenching conditions
Site-Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopy:
Introduces spin labels at specific positions in SecA
Measures distances between labeled sites
Monitors conformational changes during the translocation cycle
Single-Molecule FRET:
Labels SecA with donor and acceptor fluorophores
Observes conformational dynamics in real-time
Reveals heterogeneity in protein behavior
These techniques, when used in combination, will provide comprehensive insights into how structure relates to function in C. violaceum SecA.
Establishing an in vitro translocation system is critical for detailed mechanistic studies. Here's a methodological approach:
Component Preparation:
SecA Purification:
Express with appropriate affinity tag
Purify using affinity chromatography followed by ion exchange and size exclusion
Verify ATPase activity before use
SecYEG Complex:
Option 1: Purify native complex from C. violaceum membranes using detergent solubilization
Option 2: Recombinantly express and purify individual components, then reconstitute
Reconstitute into liposomes using E. coli polar lipid extract
Substrate Proteins:
Select known Sec-dependent proteins from C. violaceum
Express as radiolabeled (35S-methionine) or fluorescently labeled pre-proteins
Maintain in unfolded state using urea or by co-expression with chaperones
Assay Setup:
Reaction Mixture:
SecYEG proteoliposomes (0.1-0.5 mg/ml protein)
SecA (0.5-2 μM)
Substrate protein (0.1-0.5 μM)
ATP (2 mM) with regeneration system
Buffer: 50 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT
Translocation Detection:
Protease protection assay (treat with proteinase K after incubation)
Analyze protected fragments by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography/fluorescence
Quantify translocation efficiency by densitometry
Validation and Controls:
Positive Controls:
Well-characterized substrate (e.g., proOmpA if using E. coli SecYEG)
Ensure ATP-dependence by omitting ATP or adding non-hydrolyzable analog
Negative Controls:
Heat-denatured SecA
Substrate with mutated signal sequence
Proteoliposomes without SecYEG