KEGG: cvi:CV_3072
STRING: 243365.CV_3072
What is the structural classification and functional domain organization of Chromobacterium violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase?
Chromobacterium violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase (tyrS), also known as Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS), is classified as a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) based on its structural and functional characteristics. The enzyme contains the defining HIGH and KMSKS consensus sequences in its active site region and features a Rossman fold catalytic domain that binds ATP and tyrosine .
TyrRS is further sub-classified as a class Ic enzyme, functioning as an α₂ dimer unlike most class I tRNA synthetases. The protein's structure includes:
N-terminal catalytic domain with the Rossman fold
C-terminal domain involved in tRNA binding
Dimerization interface essential for function
The enzyme exhibits an unusual tRNA recognition pattern, binding to tRNA^Tyr from the major groove side of the acceptor stem (similar to class II aaRSs) and binds the tRNA across both subunits in the α₂ dimer .
What is the genomic context of the tyrS gene in Chromobacterium violaceum?
In the Chromobacterium violaceum genome (strain ATCC 12472), the tyrS gene is designated as CV_3072 . This gene encodes the tyrosine-tRNA synthetase enzyme. The genomic context surrounding tyrS can provide insights into potential co-regulated genes or operonic structures.
Based on KEGG database information, the tyrS gene is part of a broader network of tRNA synthetase genes in C. violaceum including:
| Gene ID | Gene Name | Function |
|---|---|---|
| CV_3072 | tyrS | Tyrosine-tRNA synthetase |
| CV_0505 | leuS | Leucyl-tRNA synthetase |
| CV_3740 | aspS | Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase |
| CV_1962 | argS | Arginyl-tRNA synthetase |
This genomic organization allows researchers to investigate potential co-regulation of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in response to cellular stresses or during different growth phases .
What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase?
For the successful expression of recombinant C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase, several expression systems have been reported with varying efficacy:
| Expression System | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli (BL21, Rosetta) | High yield, simple cultivation | May require codon optimization |
| Mammalian cells | Proper folding, post-translational modifications | Lower yield, higher cost |
| Yeast | Good compromise between yield and folding | Medium complexity |
| Baculovirus | High expression of complex proteins | More complex setup |
Based on available data, the optimal expression protocol involves:
Transformation of expression plasmid (containing tyrS) into E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3) Singles Competent Cells
Culture growth in Terrific Broth (TB) supplemented with appropriate antibiotics (50 μg/mL kanamycin, 25 μg/mL chloramphenicol)
Growth at 37°C to an optical density (A600) of 0.6–0.8
Induction with IPTG (500 μM)
Post-induction growth for 3 hours followed by harvesting by centrifugation (10,000 g, 4°C, 45 min)
For difficult cases, codon optimization may be necessary. In some studies with related synthetases, initial PCR amplification was unsuccessful, necessitating gene sequence optimization for expression .
What are the key methodological approaches for determining kinetic parameters of C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase?
Determining accurate kinetic parameters for C. violaceum tyrS requires carefully designed experimental approaches:
Aminoacylation Assay: The standard method involves measuring the rate of tRNA^Tyr aminoacylation using radioactively labeled amino acids ([³H]-tyrosine or [¹⁴C]-tyrosine). A time-course analysis yields initial velocity data for Michaelis-Menten kinetic analysis.
ATP-PPi Exchange Assay: This measures the reverse reaction of amino acid activation, providing KM and kcat values for ATP and tyrosine binding independently of tRNA interaction.
Scintillation Proximity Assay (SPA): This high-throughput method has been successfully used for related TyrRS enzymes and is suitable for inhibitor screening .
For comprehensive kinetic characterization, researchers should determine:
| Parameter | Typical Range for tyrS | Experimental Approach |
|---|---|---|
| KM (Tyr) | 1-10 μM | Vary [Tyr] at saturating [ATP] and [tRNA] |
| KM (ATP) | 100-500 μM | Vary [ATP] at saturating [Tyr] and [tRNA] |
| KM (tRNA^Tyr) | 0.5-2 μM | Vary [tRNA] at saturating [Tyr] and [ATP] |
| kcat | 2-10 s⁻¹ | Measure at saturating substrate concentrations |
| kcat/KM | 10⁶-10⁷ M⁻¹s⁻¹ | Calculate from individual parameters |
The inclusion of proper controls and the use of purified components are essential for accurate measurements.
How can structural studies of C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase inform inhibitor design for antimicrobial development?
Structural studies of C. violaceum tyrS can significantly advance antimicrobial development through the following approaches:
X-ray Crystallography: Obtaining high-resolution crystal structures of tyrS alone and in complex with substrates (ATP, tyrosine, tRNA^Tyr) or inhibitors. This typically requires:
Protein concentration of >10 mg/mL
Screening of 500-1000 crystallization conditions
Co-crystallization with ligands or soaking approaches
Data collection at synchrotron radiation sources
Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Using the ATP-binding pocket and tyrosine-binding pocket as targets for in silico screening of compound libraries.
Fragment-Based Drug Design: Identifying small molecular fragments that bind to different sub-pockets within the active site.
Studies with related TyrRS enzymes have identified several characteristics of effective inhibitors:
| Inhibitor Property | Structural Basis | Example Compounds |
|---|---|---|
| ATP competitive binding | Interaction with Rossman fold | BCD38C11, BCD49D09 |
| Alternative mechanism | Non-substrate competitive | BCD37H06, BCD54B04 |
| Selective inhibition | Species-specific binding pockets | - |
The class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase structure of tyrS, with its conserved HIGH and KMSKS motifs, provides specific targeting opportunities. Compounds that exploit structural differences between bacterial and human TyrRS show the most promise for selective antimicrobial development .
What role does Tyrosine--tRNA ligase play in the virulence and pathogenicity of Chromobacterium violaceum?
While direct evidence linking tyrS to C. violaceum virulence is limited, several aspects warrant investigation:
Essential Gene Function: As a crucial enzyme for protein synthesis, tyrS is essential for bacterial survival, making it a potential antibiotic target. Inhibition studies could assess its value as a therapeutic target for C. violaceum infections.
Pathogenicity Context: C. violaceum causes fatal septicemia in humans and animals . The pathogenicity islands Cpi-1/-1a and Cpi-2 encode Type III secretion systems (T3SS) that are major virulence determinants , and the relationship between core metabolic genes like tyrS and virulence genes requires further study.
Quorum Sensing Relationship: C. violaceum utilizes a sophisticated quorum sensing system (CviI/R) that regulates violacein production . Research could investigate whether translation-related processes involving tyrS are linked to quorum sensing responses.
Biofilm Formation: C. violaceum forms biofilms that contribute to its pathogenicity . The role of protein synthesis and specifically tyrS in biofilm development represents an important research direction.
Experimental approaches to study these relationships could include:
Construction of conditional tyrS mutants
Transcriptomic analysis of tyrS expression during infection
Assessment of tyrS inhibitors on virulence in animal models
Protein-protein interaction studies to identify non-canonical functions
How can researchers investigate potential non-canonical functions of C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase beyond aminoacylation?
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including TyrRS, often exhibit functions beyond their canonical role in protein synthesis. To investigate such functions in C. violaceum tyrS:
Protein Interactome Analysis:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS)
Bacterial two-hybrid screening
Co-immunoprecipitation with tyrS-specific antibodies
Crosslinking mass spectrometry to identify transient interactions
Domain Function Analysis:
Generation of truncation variants to identify functional domains
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved and non-conserved regions
Assessment of in vitro and in vivo activities beyond aminoacylation
Transcriptional and Translational Regulation:
Chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify potential DNA-binding activities
RNA immunoprecipitation to identify RNA targets beyond tRNA^Tyr
Ribosome profiling in tyrS-depleted conditions
Stress Response Studies:
Analysis of tyrS expression and activity under various stress conditions
Phenotypic analysis of tyrS overexpression or depletion under stress
It's worth noting that in other organisms, TyrRS has been implicated in:
| Non-canonical Function | Experimental Evidence | Potential Relevance to C. violaceum |
|---|---|---|
| Cytokine-like activity | Proteolytic release of cytokine domain | Potential role in host-pathogen interaction |
| Transcriptional regulation | DNA binding activity | Gene regulation during stress response |
| Apoptosis signaling | Nuclear translocation | Possible role in bacterial programmed cell death |
| Regulatory RNA binding | RNA immunoprecipitation | Post-transcriptional regulation |
These approaches could reveal novel functions of tyrS that may contribute to C. violaceum's adaptation to environmental stresses or its virulence mechanisms.
What are the comparative characteristics of C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase versus other bacterial tyrS enzymes?
Comparative analysis of C. violaceum tyrS with other bacterial orthologs provides valuable insights into evolution and potential species-specific functions:
| Species | Sequence Identity with C. violaceum tyrS | Notable Features | Inhibitor Susceptibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Varies (dual TyrRS system) | Two forms: TyrRS-Z and TyrRS-S (27% identity) | Different inhibitor profiles |
| Escherichia coli | Moderate | Well-characterized structure | Susceptible to various inhibitors |
| Pseudogulbenkiana ferrooxidans | High | Closely related violacein producer | Expected similar properties |
Key methodological approaches for comparative studies include:
Phylogenetic Analysis:
Multiple sequence alignment of tyrS from diverse bacterial species
Construction of phylogenetic trees to establish evolutionary relationships
Identification of conserved versus variable regions
Structural Comparison:
Homology modeling of C. violaceum tyrS based on crystal structures from other species
Superposition of structures to identify conserved binding pockets
Analysis of species-specific structural features that could be exploited for selective inhibition
Biochemical Comparison:
Side-by-side kinetic analysis under identical conditions
Substrate specificity profiling (non-canonical amino acids, ATP analogs)
Temperature, pH, and salt tolerance profiles
Inhibitor Cross-Reactivity:
Testing of known TyrRS inhibitors against multiple bacterial enzymes
Structure-activity relationship analysis to identify species-specific determinants
This comparative approach is particularly relevant since some bacterial species (like P. aeruginosa) possess dual TyrRS systems, whereas C. violaceum appears to have a single tyrS gene .
What are the most effective purification strategies for obtaining homogeneous preparations of recombinant C. violaceum Tyrosine--tRNA ligase?
Obtaining highly pure, active preparations of recombinant C. violaceum tyrS requires a carefully designed purification strategy:
| Purification Step | Methodology | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| Affinity Chromatography | His-tag/Ni-NTA or Strep-tag | 70-80% purity |
| Ion Exchange | Resource Q or S column | >85% purity |
| Size Exclusion | Superdex 200 | >95% purity, dimeric form |
| Tag Removal | TEV or PreScission protease | Native protein |
The recommended complete purification protocol involves:
Lysis Buffer Optimization:
50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole
Addition of protease inhibitors (PMSF, leupeptin, pepstatin)
DNase I to reduce viscosity
Lysis via sonication or French press
Affinity Purification:
Pre-equilibration of Ni-NTA resin
Batch binding followed by column packing
Stepwise washing with increasing imidazole (20-40 mM)
Elution with 250 mM imidazole
Tag Cleavage and Secondary Purification:
Overnight dialysis with TEV protease
Reverse Ni-NTA to remove cleaved tag and TEV
Ion exchange chromatography to separate charge variants
Final Polishing and Storage:
Size exclusion chromatography in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl
Concentration to 1-10 mg/mL using appropriate molecular weight cutoff
Flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen with 10% glycerol
Quality assessment should include SDS-PAGE (>85% purity), enzymatic activity assays, and dynamic light scattering to confirm homogeneity and proper oligomeric state .