Recombinant Citrobacter koseri Monofunctional Biosynthetic Peptidoglycan Transglycosylase (mtgA) is a recombinant protein derived from the bacterium Citrobacter koseri. This enzyme plays a crucial role in the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan, a key component of bacterial cell walls. The mtgA protein is responsible for polymerizing the glycan chains of peptidoglycan, which is essential for maintaining the structural integrity and shape of the bacterial cell.
The recombinant mtgA protein is expressed in Escherichia coli and is fused with an N-terminal His tag for easy purification and identification. The protein consists of 242 amino acids and is available in a lyophilized powder form with a purity of greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE .
The mtgA enzyme is a monofunctional biosynthetic peptidoglycan transglycosylase, meaning it only possesses the transglycosylase activity necessary for polymerizing glycan chains. Unlike bifunctional penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) that have both transglycosylase and transpeptidase activities, mtgA does not catalyze peptide cross-linking .
Glycan Chain Polymerization: mtgA polymerizes the glycan chains of peptidoglycan, which are composed of alternating N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) residues.
Cell Wall Integrity: The polymerization of glycan chains is crucial for maintaining the structural integrity of the bacterial cell wall, which is essential for bacterial survival and resistance to osmotic pressure.
Research on mtgA has focused on its role in bacterial cell wall synthesis and its potential as a target for antibiotic development. Given the increasing resistance of bacteria to traditional antibiotics, enzymes like mtgA are being explored as novel targets for therapeutic interventions .
Antibiotic Target: Inhibiting mtgA could disrupt peptidoglycan synthesis, leading to weakened bacterial cell walls and increased susceptibility to osmotic stress.
Biotechnological Tools: Recombinant mtgA can be used as a tool in biotechnological applications, such as studying peptidoglycan biosynthesis or developing novel antimicrobial strategies.
KEGG: cko:CKO_04611
STRING: 290338.CKO_04611
Monofunctional peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase (mtgA) specifically catalyzes glycan chain elongation of the bacterial cell wall. Unlike bifunctional peptidoglycan synthases such as PBP1a and PBP1b, mtgA possesses only glycosyltransferase activity, without transpeptidase activity. In bacterial species, mtgA functions by polymerizing lipid II precursors to form the glycan backbone of peptidoglycan . This process is essential for maintaining cell wall integrity and proper bacterial cell division. Experimental evidence has shown that GFP-MtgA fusion proteins demonstrate glycosyltransferase activity in vitro, with studies showing a 2.4-fold increase in peptidoglycan polymerization when GFP-MtgA is overexpressed compared to controls (26% versus 11% of lipid II used) .
MtgA plays a significant role in bacterial cell division by participating in peptidoglycan synthesis at the division site. Localization studies have demonstrated that MtgA can localize at the division site of bacterial cells, particularly in cells deficient in certain penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). MtgA interacts with multiple divisome proteins, including PBP3, FtsW, and FtsN, suggesting that it works collaboratively within the divisome to synthesize peptidoglycan during cell division . This coordination appears to be critical for proper septum formation and subsequent cell division. The interaction between mtgA and FtsN is particularly noteworthy, as FtsN has been shown to stimulate in vitro peptidoglycan synthesis activities and may coordinate peptidoglycan synthases during cell division .
MtgA localization in bacterial cells is influenced by the presence or absence of other peptidoglycan synthesis enzymes. In Escherichia coli cells deficient in PBP1b and producing a thermosensitive PBP1a, MtgA localizes specifically at the division site . When PBP1b is expressed from a plasmid in these cells, MtgA no longer localizes at the midcell, suggesting competitive localization between mtgA and class A PBPs . This conditional localization pattern indicates that mtgA might serve as a compensatory mechanism when primary peptidoglycan synthases are compromised. The specific localization pattern suggests that mtgA may play a backup role in peptidoglycan synthesis during cell division, particularly when other key enzymes are deficient or impaired.
The activity of recombinant C. koseri mtgA can be effectively measured using radiolabeled substrates in an in vitro transglycosylase assay. Based on established protocols, the following methodology can be implemented:
Standard in vitro transglycosylase assay protocol:
Reaction mixture composition:
Purified recombinant mtgA protein (5-10 μg)
C14-GlcNAc-labeled lipid II substrate (approximately 9,000-10,000 dpm/nmol)
15% dimethyl sulfoxide
10% octanol
50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.0)
0.5% decyl-polyethylene glycol
10 mM CaCl₂
Incubate the reaction at 30°C for 1 hour
Separate the polymerized products using thin-layer chromatography
Quantify the radiolabeled products using a phosphorimager or scintillation counting
Calculate the percentage of lipid II substrate converted to polymer
Validation of polymerized products can be confirmed by adding lysozyme to the reaction products, which should result in complete digestion of the polymerized material . Activity is typically expressed as the percentage of lipid II substrate incorporated into polymerized peptidoglycan.
Recommended expression and purification protocol:
Vector construction:
Clone the C. koseri mtgA gene into a pET-based expression vector
Include a C-terminal His6-tag or other affinity tag for purification
Optional: create a fusion with GFP to monitor expression and purification
Expression conditions:
Transform vector into E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar expression strain
Grow cells at 37°C to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.6-0.8)
Induce protein expression with 0.5 mM IPTG
Reduce temperature to 18-20°C for overnight expression to enhance protein solubility
Cell lysis and membrane protein extraction:
Harvest cells by centrifugation (5,000 × g, 15 min, 4°C)
Resuspend in lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol
Add protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Disrupt cells by sonication or French press
Isolate membrane fraction by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g, 1 h, 4°C)
Solubilize membrane proteins with appropriate detergent (e.g., 1% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside)
Purification steps:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and obtain homogeneous protein
Concentrate purified protein to 5-10 mg/ml for enzymatic assays or crystallization
This protocol has been successful for similar membrane-associated glycosyltransferases and should yield functional recombinant mtgA protein with glycosyltransferase activity, as demonstrated by the successful purification of active GFP-MtgA fusion proteins described in previous research .
Several complementary approaches can be employed to study mtgA interactions with other divisome proteins:
1. Bacterial Two-Hybrid (BACTH) System:
This system has been successfully used to detect interactions between mtgA and divisome proteins including PBP3, FtsW, and FtsN
Advantages: Can detect interactions in a near-native environment
Protocol highlights:
Clone mtgA and potential interaction partners into compatible BACTH vectors
Co-transform into reporter strain (e.g., E. coli BTH101)
Plate on selective media containing X-gal
Quantify interaction strength by β-galactosidase assay
2. Fluorescence Microscopy with Protein Localization:
Create fluorescent protein fusions (e.g., GFP-mtgA) to visualize localization
Perform co-localization studies with other fluorescently tagged divisome proteins
Time-lapse microscopy can reveal the dynamics of protein recruitment to the division site
Analyze co-localization using specialized software to generate quantitative data
3. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use antibodies against mtgA or tagged versions to pull down protein complexes
Identify interaction partners by mass spectrometry
Validate specific interactions by Western blotting
4. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):
For in vitro confirmation of direct interactions
Determine binding affinities and thermodynamic parameters
Requires purified proteins or protein domains
Data interpretation:
When analyzing protein-protein interactions, researchers should include appropriate controls and consider that membrane protein interactions may be affected by detergents used during purification. Cross-validation using multiple methods is recommended for confirming genuine interactions.
Comparative analysis of mtgA across different bacterial species reveals important insights into its conservation and potential specialization in C. koseri:
*Percentage identities are estimated based on typical sequence conservation patterns among Enterobacteriaceae
C. koseri possesses several unique genomic features that may influence mtgA function in the context of pathogenicity:
The Group 8-specific core genome (C. koseri-specific) contains 285 gene families not found in other Citrobacter groups
C. koseri has fewer antibiotic resistance genes compared to other Citrobacter species
C. koseri contains specialized transport and metabolism genes that may provide advantages during infection
These genomic differences suggest that while mtgA's enzymatic function is likely conserved, its regulation, interaction partners, and contribution to pathogenicity may be specialized in C. koseri compared to homologs in other bacterial species.
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing can be a powerful approach to study mtgA function in C. koseri through gene knockout, modification, or complementation. Below is a methodological approach for implementing this technique:
Protocol for CRISPR-Cas9 editing of mtgA in C. koseri:
sgRNA design:
Identify target sequences within the mtgA gene with minimal off-target effects
Design at least 3-4 different sgRNAs targeting different regions
Include NGG PAM sequences required for Cas9 recognition
Verify specificity using tools like CHOPCHOP or CRISPOR
Vector construction:
Clone sgRNAs into a CRISPR-Cas9 vector compatible with C. koseri
For gene knockout: Design homology arms to introduce a stop codon or deletion
For gene modification: Design repair template with desired mutations flanked by homology arms
Include selectable marker for screening transformants
Transformation of C. koseri:
Prepare electrocompetent C. koseri cells
Transform with CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid containing sgRNA and repair template
Recover cells in rich media before plating on selective media
Optimize electroporation parameters for C. koseri (typically 1.8-2.5 kV)
Screening and validation:
Screen colonies by PCR to identify potential mutants
Confirm mutations by Sanger sequencing
Verify protein knockout by Western blot
Perform whole genome sequencing to check for off-target effects
Phenotypic characterization:
Challenges and solutions:
C. koseri may have lower transformation efficiency than model organisms
Multiple chromosomal copies of the target gene may require sequential editing
Potential effects on cell viability if mtgA is essential can be addressed by creating conditional mutants
This approach can be used to generate various mtgA mutants for functional studies, including complete gene knockouts, domain-specific mutations, or reporter gene fusions.
In vitro reconstitution systems provide powerful tools for understanding the molecular mechanisms of mtgA activity and its interaction with other cell wall synthesis enzymes. The following methodological approaches can be employed:
1. Purified Protein Reconstitution System:
Components needed:
Purified recombinant C. koseri mtgA (with or without fusion tags)
Lipid II substrate (radiolabeled or fluorescently labeled)
Appropriate membrane mimetic environment (nanodiscs, liposomes, or detergent micelles)
Experimental approach:
Reconstitute proteins individually or in combination in membrane mimetics
Initiate reaction by adding lipid II substrate
Monitor product formation using:
Thin-layer chromatography for radiolabeled substrates
HPLC analysis of digested products
Fluorescence-based assays for fluorescent substrates
Compare activities of mtgA alone versus in combination with potential partner proteins
2. Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) System:
This system allows real-time monitoring of protein-protein interactions and enzymatic activity:
Label mtgA and interacting proteins with appropriate FRET pairs (e.g., CFP/YFP)
Monitor FRET signal changes upon protein mixing and substrate addition
Correlate FRET changes with enzymatic activity measurements
Use this system to determine:
Binding kinetics between proteins
Conformational changes during catalysis
Effects of inhibitors or mutations
Sample data table that might be generated from such experiments:
| Protein Combination | Relative Glycosyltransferase Activity (%) | FRET Efficiency (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| mtgA alone | 100 (reference) | N/A | Baseline activity |
| mtgA + PBP3 | 125 ± 15 | 22 ± 3 | Moderate enhancement |
| mtgA + FtsW | 210 ± 25 | 45 ± 5 | Strong enhancement |
| mtgA + FtsN | 180 ± 20 | 38 ± 4 | Significant enhancement |
| mtgA + FtsW + FtsN | 250 ± 30 | 52 ± 6 | Synergistic effect |
| mtgA (D95A mutant) | 5 ± 2 | N/A | Catalytic mutant |
| mtgA (D95A) + FtsW + FtsN | 5 ± 2 | 50 ± 5 | Binding maintained despite loss of activity |
These reconstitution systems allow detailed mechanistic studies of mtgA function and provide insights into how this enzyme coordinates with other divisome proteins during bacterial cell wall synthesis.
When studying recombinant C. koseri mtgA, researchers often encounter differences between in vitro enzymatic assays and in vivo phenotypic observations. These discrepancies require careful interpretation:
Common discrepancies and interpretation strategies:
Activity levels:
Observation: Purified recombinant mtgA shows lower activity in vitro than expected based on in vivo phenotypes
Interpretation approach: Consider that in vitro conditions may lack essential cofactors or interaction partners present in vivo
Solution: Supplement in vitro assays with factors like FtsN, which has been shown to stimulate peptidoglycan synthesis activities
Localization patterns:
Enzyme kinetics:
Observation: Substrate utilization rates differ between in vitro assays and cellular measurements
Interpretation approach: Consider substrate accessibility, local concentration effects, and membrane environment differences
Solution: Use membrane mimetics that better represent the native environment
Protein-protein interactions:
Observation: Interactions detected in bacterial two-hybrid systems may not correlate with functional effects in vitro
Interpretation approach: Consider that interactions may be transient or dependent on specific cellular conditions
Solution: Validate interactions using multiple complementary methods and correlate with functional assays
When faced with discrepancies, researchers should:
Systematically evaluate experimental conditions for both approaches
Consider physiological relevance of buffer conditions, substrate concentrations, and reaction environments
Develop more complex in vitro systems that better mimic cellular environments
Use genetic approaches to validate biochemical findings and vice versa
Proper statistical analysis is crucial for interpreting enzymatic activity data for recombinant C. koseri mtgA. The following methodological approach is recommended:
Statistical workflow for mtgA activity data:
Experimental design considerations:
Use biological replicates (minimum n=3) from independent protein preparations
Include technical replicates (typically 2-3) for each biological replicate
Include appropriate positive and negative controls in each experiment
Data normalization approaches:
Normalize raw activity data to:
Protein concentration (specific activity)
Positive control reference enzyme
Internal standard
For comparative studies, express data as relative activity (% of wild-type or untreated control)
Statistical tests for different experimental scenarios:
| Experimental Scenario | Recommended Statistical Test | Assumptions to Verify |
|---|---|---|
| Comparing wild-type vs. mutant mtgA | Student's t-test (paired or unpaired) | Normal distribution, equal variance |
| Comparing multiple mutants | One-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Tukey's or Dunnett's) | Normal distribution, equal variance |
| Dose-response experiments | Non-linear regression (4-parameter logistic model) | Appropriate curve fit |
| Enzyme kinetics data | Non-linear regression for Michaelis-Menten or allosteric models | Substrate ranges cover Km |
| Non-normally distributed data | Non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis) | No specific distribution requirement |
Reporting standards:
Report means ± standard deviation or standard error
Include p-values for statistical comparisons
Provide n values (biological replicates)
Report confidence intervals where appropriate
Include raw data points in graphical representations
Advanced analysis for complex datasets:
Principal component analysis for identifying patterns in multivariate data
Hierarchical clustering for identifying relationships between multiple mutants
Machine learning approaches for identifying structure-function relationships
For enzyme kinetic parameters, the following data presentation format is recommended:
| Enzyme Variant | kcat (s⁻¹) | Km (μM) | kcat/Km (M⁻¹s⁻¹) | Statistical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type mtgA | X ± SD | Y ± SD | Z ± SD | Reference |
| Catalytic mutant | X' ± SD | Y' ± SD | Z' ± SD | p < 0.001 (vs. WT) |
| Regulatory domain mutant | X" ± SD | Y" ± SD | Z" ± SD | p < 0.05 (vs. WT) |
By following these statistical approaches, researchers can ensure robust and reproducible analysis of mtgA enzymatic data, facilitating meaningful comparisons across different experimental conditions and between different research groups.
Based on current understanding of C. koseri mtgA and related transglycosylases, several promising research avenues for antimicrobial development can be pursued:
Structure-based inhibitor design:
Determine high-resolution crystal structure of C. koseri mtgA
Identify unique structural features compared to human enzymes
Design selective inhibitors targeting the active site or allosteric sites
Focus on non-substrate analogs to avoid cross-resistance with existing glycopeptide antibiotics
Combination therapy approaches:
Explore synergistic effects between mtgA inhibitors and:
β-lactam antibiotics targeting PBPs
Cell division inhibitors
Membrane-disrupting agents
Design dual-targeting molecules that simultaneously inhibit mtgA and other cell wall synthesis enzymes
Protein-protein interaction disruptors:
Pathogen-specific targeting:
Leverage C. koseri-specific features for selective targeting
Focus on differences in mtgA between C. koseri and commensal bacteria
Develop narrow-spectrum agents to minimize disruption of the microbiome
Immunological approaches:
Investigate mtgA as a potential vaccine antigen
Develop antibodies targeting surface-exposed regions of mtgA
Explore the potential for antibody-antibiotic conjugates for targeted delivery
Research priorities table:
| Approach | Technical Feasibility | Potential Impact | Timeline | Key Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure-based inhibitor design | High | High | 3-5 years | Obtaining crystal structure of membrane-associated enzyme |
| Combination therapy approaches | High | Medium-High | 2-4 years | Identifying synergistic combinations without toxicity |
| Protein-protein interaction disruptors | Medium | High | 4-6 years | Specificity for bacterial interactions |
| Pathogen-specific targeting | Medium | Medium | 3-5 years | Maintaining efficacy while narrowing spectrum |
| Immunological approaches | Low-Medium | Medium | 5-7 years | Generating sufficient immune response to bacterial enzyme |
This multifaceted approach to targeting mtgA would create new opportunities for combating C. koseri infections, particularly in vulnerable populations such as neonates and immunocompromised individuals where this pathogen causes serious central nervous system infections .
Systems biology approaches offer powerful frameworks for understanding mtgA function within the broader context of C. koseri cellular processes:
Multi-omics integration strategies:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data from mtgA mutants
Map changes across multiple cellular pathways
Identify compensatory mechanisms activated when mtgA function is compromised
Correlate with phenotypic changes in growth, morphology, and virulence
Methodological approach:
Generate mtgA knockout or conditional mutants
Analyze global transcript, protein, and metabolite profiles under various conditions
Apply network analysis to identify key hubs and regulatory connections
Validate predictions through targeted experiments
Computational modeling of cell wall biogenesis:
Develop mathematical models incorporating:
Enzymatic activities of all peptidoglycan synthesis enzymes
Spatial and temporal regulation during cell division
Interaction networks within the divisome
Simulate effects of mtgA perturbation on cell wall structure and integrity
Predict compensatory mechanisms and synthetic lethal interactions
In vivo infection dynamics:
Track C. koseri proliferation and dissemination in animal models
Compare wild-type and mtgA mutant strains
Identify tissue-specific requirements for mtgA function
Correlate with host immune responses and pathological outcomes
Experimental design elements:
Synthetic biology approaches:
Engineer C. koseri strains with modified mtgA expression or activity
Introduce heterologous transglycosylases to assess functional complementation
Create chimeric enzymes to identify domain-specific functions
Develop inducible systems for temporal control of mtgA expression
Integrated data interpretation framework:
| Data Type | Measurement | Analysis Approach | Integration Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcriptome | RNA-seq | Differential expression analysis | Identify co-regulated gene clusters |
| Proteome | Mass spectrometry | Protein abundance and PTMs | Map to transcriptional changes |
| Metabolome | LC-MS/MS | Metabolic pathway analysis | Connect to peptidoglycan precursor pools |
| Phenome | Growth, morphology, virulence | Multivariate analysis | Correlate molecular changes with phenotypes |
| Interactome | Protein-protein interactions | Network analysis | Identify key interaction hubs |
By integrating these systems biology approaches, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of how mtgA functions within the complex cellular network of C. koseri, potentially revealing new therapeutic targets and intervention strategies for treating infections caused by this important opportunistic pathogen.
Despite growing understanding of bacterial peptidoglycan synthesis, several critical knowledge gaps remain in our understanding of C. koseri mtgA:
Structural characterization: The three-dimensional structure of C. koseri mtgA remains undetermined, limiting structure-based approaches to understanding its function and developing inhibitors.
Regulatory mechanisms: How expression and activity of mtgA are regulated in response to environmental conditions, antibiotic stress, and during infection remains poorly understood.
Functional redundancy: The extent to which other glycosyltransferases can compensate for mtgA deficiency in C. koseri needs further investigation, particularly given observations of conditional localization in E. coli .
Species-specific differences: While some information can be extrapolated from E. coli studies, the specific properties and interactions of C. koseri mtgA require direct experimental validation.
Contribution to pathogenesis: The specific role of mtgA in C. koseri virulence, particularly in the context of central nervous system infections, remains to be elucidated.
These knowledge gaps present significant opportunities for researchers to make important contributions to our understanding of C. koseri biology and pathogenesis.
To accelerate progress and enable meaningful comparisons across studies, the following standardized protocols would benefit researchers studying bacterial transglycosylases:
Enzyme activity assays:
Standardized substrate preparation methods
Defined reaction conditions (buffer composition, pH, temperature)
Calibrated activity units and reporting standards
Reference enzyme standards for inter-laboratory comparisons
Protein production and purification:
Optimized expression constructs and host systems
Detailed purification protocols for maintaining enzyme stability
Quality control standards for assessing protein purity and activity
Methods for reconstitution in membrane-mimetic environments
Genetic manipulation:
Validated CRISPR-Cas9 protocols for C. koseri
Standardized knockout and complementation strategies
Reporter systems for monitoring gene expression
Phenotypic assay standards for mutant characterization
Structural analysis:
Optimized crystallization conditions for transglycosylases
NMR protocols for studying dynamic regions
Cryo-EM approaches for membrane-associated enzyme complexes
In silico modeling validation standards
Animal infection models: