Recombinant Citrobacter koseri UPF0761 membrane protein CKO_03126 is a full-length, His-tagged protein derived from the Citrobacter koseri UPF0761 gene. Key features include:
| Property | Details |
|---|---|
| Protein Length | 290 amino acids (1–290 aa) |
| Molecular Weight | Not explicitly stated (estimated via sequence analysis) |
| Source Organism | Citrobacter koseri (Gram-negative bacterium) |
| Expression System | E. coli (recombinant production) |
| Tag | N-terminal His tag |
| Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE validated) |
| Form | Lyophilized powder |
| Storage Buffer | Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose, pH 8.0 |
| UniProt ID | A8AL54 |
CKO_03126 is primarily utilized in structural and functional studies of C. koseri membrane biology. Potential applications include:
Antibiotic Resistance Studies: Exploring interactions with antimicrobial peptides or β-lactamase inhibitors.
Vaccine Development: As a candidate antigen, though not yet prioritized in subtractive proteomics screens .
Membrane Protein Structural Analysis: Elucidating folding patterns via X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM.
| Attribute | CKO_03126 (UPF0761) | Other C. koseri Proteins |
|---|---|---|
| UniProt ID | A8AL54 | A8AD07 (UNG) |
| Pathway Involvement | Undocumented | Nucleotide excision repair |
| Expression Host | E. coli | E. coli (common) |
Functional Elucidation: Requires knockout studies or interaction mapping.
Structural Determination: Cryo-EM or NMR studies to resolve membrane topology.
Therapeutic Potential: Testing as a vaccine candidate or drug target.
KEGG: cko:CKO_03126
STRING: 290338.CKO_03126
E. coli is the established expression system for recombinant CKO_03126 protein production, as demonstrated in existing protocols. The current available recombinant form utilizes an N-terminal His-tag for purification purposes .
For researchers seeking to optimize expression, consider the following methodological approach:
Strain selection: BL21(DE3), C41(DE3), or C43(DE3) strains are recommended for membrane protein expression
Expression vector optimization: pET series vectors containing T7 promoter systems with tunable induction
Induction conditions: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) with reduced IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) often yield better results for membrane proteins
Growth media supplementation: Addition of glycerol (0.5-1%) can improve membrane protein folding
Researchers should validate protein functionality through activity assays following successful expression and purification.
The optimal storage conditions for purified CKO_03126 protein involve maintaining protein stability while preventing degradation. The recommended methodology includes:
Long-term storage: Store at -20°C/-80°C in appropriate buffer systems
Buffer composition: Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0
Aliquoting strategy: Prepare single-use aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Reconstitution protocol:
For experimental applications requiring extended stability, researchers should perform pilot studies comparing different stabilizing additives (glycerol, trehalose, sucrose) and evaluate protein integrity by SDS-PAGE at defined time points.
For functional studies involving CKO_03126, proper reconstitution into membrane mimetics is critical. The recommended methodological approach includes:
Selection of membrane mimetic:
Detergent micelles: DDM, LMNG, or Triton X-100 (initial screening)
Lipid nanodiscs: DMPC/DMPG mixtures with MSP1D1 scaffold protein
Liposomes: E. coli total lipid extract or defined lipid mixtures
Reconstitution protocol:
Detergent solubilization of purified protein
Addition of lipids at appropriate protein:lipid ratios (1:100 to 1:1000 molar ratio)
Controlled detergent removal via dialysis or bio-beads
Verification of reconstitution by size-exclusion chromatography
Functionality assessment:
Thermal stability assays (CPM or nanoDSF)
Circular dichroism to confirm secondary structure
Functional assays based on predicted activity
Researchers should optimize reconstitution conditions through systematic screening of detergents, lipids, and buffer conditions to maintain native-like protein conformation .
For predicting the structure of membrane proteins like CKO_03126, researchers should employ a comprehensive computational approach that addresses the unique challenges of membrane protein modeling:
Selection of appropriate membrane modeling framework:
Prediction workflow:
Sequence alignment and homology modeling if suitable templates exist
Ab initio modeling for regions lacking homology
Refinement in a realistic membrane environment
Validation through energy minimization and molecular dynamics
Evaluation metrics:
Native structure discrimination
Prediction of insertion energy and orientation in the membrane
ΔΔG calculation accuracy
The M19 model has demonstrated improved performance in computational benchmarks against experimental targets including prediction of protein orientations in bilayers and native structure discrimination, making it particularly suitable for proteins like CKO_03126 .
Determining the orientation of CKO_03126 in the membrane requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:
Site-directed labeling techniques:
Cysteine scanning mutagenesis with subsequent labeling using membrane-impermeable reagents
Analysis of accessibility patterns to determine topology
Protease protection assays:
Limited proteolysis of reconstituted protein in liposomes
Identification of protected fragments by mass spectrometry
Antibody accessibility studies:
Generation of antibodies against specific domains
Assessment of binding to intact vs. permeabilized proteoliposomes
Computational validation:
Use of the M19 membrane model to predict favorable insertion energy
Energy landscape mapping of potential orientations
The experimental data can be integrated with computational predictions to generate a consensus model of CKO_03126 orientation. The M19 model has been validated with oligomeric membrane proteins and has successfully predicted favorable insertion energies where other models failed .
Determining the function of uncharacterized membrane proteins like CKO_03126 requires a systematic approach combining computational predictions with targeted experiments:
Computational functional inference:
Sequence-based analysis: BLAST, HMM profiles, and conserved domain search
Structural homology: Comparison with structurally characterized proteins
Genomic context: Analysis of operon structure and gene neighborhood
Experimental validation plan:
Transport assays: Reconstitution in liposomes with fluorescent substrates
Binding studies: Thermal shift assays with potential ligands
Phenotypic analysis: Gene knockout/complementation in Citrobacter koseri
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Pull-down assays using His-tagged CKO_03126
Crosslinking studies in native or reconstituted systems
Bacterial two-hybrid or FRET-based interaction assays
Researchers should develop multiple working hypotheses regarding protein function based on computational predictions and systematically test these hypotheses through targeted experimental approaches.
For studying protein-protein interactions involving membrane proteins like CKO_03126, researchers should employ complementary approaches that address the challenges of membrane protein biochemistry:
In vitro methodologies:
Affinity purification with tagged CKO_03126 as bait
Crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (XL-MS)
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with immobilized CKO_03126
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) for quantitative binding analysis
In vivo approaches:
Split reporter systems (BACTH, split-GFP)
Proximity labeling methods (BioID, APEX)
Co-immunoprecipitation from native membranes
Data analysis framework:
Filtering of candidates based on subcellular localization
Validation through reciprocal pull-downs
Functional characterization of identified interactions
When publishing interaction studies, researchers should present data in table format with quantitative metrics (dissociation constants, enrichment factors) and multiple biological replicates to ensure reproducibility.
Engineering CKO_03126 variants requires sophisticated computational design approaches specifically tailored for membrane proteins:
Computational workflow for stability engineering:
Structure prediction using the biologically realistic implicit membrane model (M19)
Identification of destabilizing regions through in silico alanine scanning
Design of stabilizing mutations preserving native-like features
Energy evaluation in a membrane environment accounting for:
Function modification strategy:
Identification of putative functional residues through evolutionary analysis
Targeted library design focusing on these regions
In silico screening of variants using molecular dynamics simulations
Experimental validation through activity assays
Design evaluation metrics:
Native sequence recovery analysis
Energy landscape comparison to wild-type protein
Preservation of membrane protein hallmarks (interfacial aromatics, hydrophobic matching)
The advanced M19 model overcomes critical flaws in previous membrane models by avoiding leucine-rich designs and generating sequences with amino acid distributions closer to native membrane proteins .
Investigating lipid-protein interactions for CKO_03126 requires careful methodological considerations:
Experimental design for lipid dependence studies:
Systematic reconstitution in defined lipid compositions:
Variable head groups (PC, PE, PG, PS)
Acyl chain lengths and saturation
Inclusion of specific lipids (cardiolipin, cholesterol)
Careful control of protein:lipid ratios and reconstitution efficiency
Analytical techniques:
Differential scanning calorimetry to measure thermostability
Solid-state NMR to detect specific lipid-protein interactions
Molecular dynamics simulations with explicit lipids
Fluorescence-based assays for functional assessment
Data analysis framework:
Construction of lipid dependence profiles
Correlation of lipid properties with functional parameters
Identification of specific binding sites vs. bulk effects
Researchers should present lipid dependence data in comprehensive tables correlating multiple parameters (acyl chain length, headgroup, bilayer thickness) with functional metrics to identify determinant factors for CKO_03126 activity.
Membrane protein purification presents unique challenges that researchers working with CKO_03126 should anticipate and address methodically:
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Recommended Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression yield | Protein toxicity, inclusion body formation | Optimize expression conditions (lower temperature, reduced inducer); test different E. coli strains (C41, C43); use fusion partners (MBP, SUMO) |
| Poor solubilization | Inadequate detergent selection, insufficient extraction time | Screen detergent panel (DDM, LMNG, CHS combinations); optimize detergent:protein ratio; extend solubilization time at 4°C |
| Protein instability | Detergent-induced denaturation, lipid depletion | Add lipids during purification; include stabilizing additives (glycerol, trehalose); minimize purification time |
| Aggregation during concentration | Detergent concentration effect, protein-protein interactions | Utilize concentration methods that don't concentrate detergent; maintain temperature at 4°C; add specific lipids |
| Loss of function | Delipidation, cofactor loss, conformational changes | Supplement with specific lipids; identify and add essential cofactors; validate function at each purification step |
For CKO_03126, researchers should perform small-scale optimization experiments before scaling up, with protein quality assessment through size-exclusion chromatography after each optimization step .
Validating predicted structures of CKO_03126 requires a comprehensive strategy combining computational and experimental approaches:
Computational validation metrics:
Energy evaluation in realistic membrane environments
Ramachandran plot analysis for backbone conformations
Assessment of insertion energy into the bilayer
Molecular dynamics stability over extended simulations
Experimental validation techniques:
Limited proteolysis to confirm domain organization
Disulfide crosslinking to validate predicted residue proximities
Site-directed spin labeling EPR for distance measurements
Mass spectrometry-based protein footprinting
Structure-function correlation studies:
Site-directed mutagenesis of key predicted structural elements
Functional assays to correlate structural features with activity
Thermal stability analysis of designed mutations
Researchers should emphasize the importance of using the biologically realistic implicit membrane model (M19) for validation, as it has demonstrated superior performance in discriminating native structures from incorrect models .
To ensure reproducibility and transparency in research involving CKO_03126, researchers should adhere to the following reporting standards:
Materials reporting:
Complete sequence information including any tags
Expression construct details with vector maps
Strain information and growth conditions
Detailed purification protocol with buffer compositions
Methodological transparency:
Step-by-step protocols for key experiments
Equipment specifications and settings
Statistical analysis methods and sample sizes
Raw data availability statement
Computational method documentation:
Software versions and parameters
Model validation metrics
Input files and processing scripts
Accessibility of computational workflows
When publishing, researchers should include supplementary material with detailed protocols that would enable reproducibility by other laboratories. Additionally, protein samples should be characterized by multiple methods (SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry, circular dichroism) to confirm identity and quality .
When faced with contradictory data regarding CKO_03126 function, researchers should implement a systematic framework for resolution:
Methodological comparison analysis:
Side-by-side comparison of experimental conditions
Identification of critical variables between studies
Standardization of protocols to eliminate methodological differences
Orthogonal validation approach:
Employ multiple independent techniques to assess the same functional property
Utilize both in vitro reconstituted systems and in vivo approaches
Quantify function using different detection methodologies
Collaborative resolution strategy:
Direct collaboration with laboratories reporting contradictory results
Exchange of materials and protocols
Joint publication of consensus findings or structured disagreement
Researchers should present contradictory data transparently, including a comprehensive table comparing methodological differences between studies and their potential impact on results. The experimental design should explicitly address variables that might explain discrepancies in the literature .
Several cutting-edge technologies offer significant potential for deeper characterization of membrane proteins like CKO_03126:
Structural biology advancements:
Cryo-electron microscopy for medium to high-resolution structures without crystallization
Integrative structural biology combining multiple data sources (NMR, SAXS, crosslinking)
Microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) for structure determination from nanocrystals
Functional analysis innovations:
Single-molecule force spectroscopy for conformational dynamics
Nanoscale native mass spectrometry for intact membrane protein complexes
Advanced microscopy techniques (STORM, PALM) for in situ localization and dynamics
Computational method developments:
AI-driven structure prediction specifically optimized for membrane proteins
Molecular dynamics with polarizable force fields for accurate membrane interactions
Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics approaches for reaction mechanisms
Researchers should consider how these emerging technologies could address specific knowledge gaps regarding CKO_03126, prioritizing approaches that would overcome current methodological limitations .
Several critical knowledge gaps regarding CKO_03126 should guide future research priorities:
Functional role in Citrobacter koseri:
Physiological substrate identification
Contribution to bacterial pathogenesis or commensalism
Regulatory mechanisms controlling expression
Structural organization:
High-resolution structure determination
Conformational dynamics during function
Oligomerization state in native membranes
Interaction network:
Identification of protein partners
Lipid interactions and specificity
Integration into cellular pathways
Evolutionary significance:
Conservation across bacterial species
Structural homology with characterized proteins
Evolutionary pressure and sequence conservation patterns