Recombinant Clostridium beijerinckii ATP synthase subunit c (atpE)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format we have in stock. If you have a specific format requirement, please indicate it in your order notes. We will prepare the product according to your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery times.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance. Additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend briefly centrifuging this vial prior to opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%. Customers can use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by several factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein itself. Generally, the shelf life of the liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of the lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquoting is necessary for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a preferred tag type, please let us know, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
atpE; Cbei_0413; ATP synthase subunit c; ATP synthase F(0 sector subunit c; F-type ATPase subunit c; F-ATPase subunit c; Lipid-binding protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-71
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Clostridium beijerinckii (strain ATCC 51743 / NCIMB 8052) (Clostridium acetobutylicum)
Target Names
atpE
Target Protein Sequence
MSLGVLAAGIAVLSGIGAGVGIGIAAGKAVEAVGRQPEASGRVMTFFILGAALCETTAIY GLVMAFMLMGR
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
F(1)F(0) ATP synthase is responsible for ATP production from ADP in the presence of a proton or sodium gradient. F-type ATPases consist of two structural domains: F(1) containing the extramembraneous catalytic core and F(0) containing the membrane proton channel, linked by a central stalk and a peripheral stalk. During catalysis, ATP synthesis in the catalytic domain of F(1) is coupled to proton translocation through a rotary mechanism of the central stalk subunits. This subunit is a key component of the F(0) channel, playing a direct role in translocation across the membrane. A homomeric c-ring composed of 10-14 subunits forms the central stalk rotor element, interacting with the F(1) delta and epsilon subunits.
Database Links
Protein Families
ATPase C chain family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the genomic organization of the ATP synthase operon in Clostridium beijerinckii?

While specific data for C. beijerinckii is limited in the provided literature, we can extrapolate from closely related Clostridium species. In Clostridium pasteurianum, the atp operon consists of nine genes arranged in the order atpI(i), atpB(a), atpE(c), atpF(b), atpH(δ), atpA(α), atpG(γ), atpD(β), and atpC(ɛ), which follows the pattern found in many other bacteria . This organization likely applies to C. beijerinckii as well, with the atpE gene encoding subunit c positioned third in the operon. Researchers investigating C. beijerinckii should first verify this organization through genome analysis before designing expression constructs, as slight variations may exist between species.

How does ATP synthase function in anaerobic Clostridium species compared to aerobic organisms?

In anaerobic organisms like Clostridium species, ATP synthase function differs significantly from aerobic organisms. In C. acetobutylicum, neither the electron transport chain nor the Rnf complex (typically required for F-type ATPases to produce ATP) has been reported . Instead, ATP is primarily produced through substrate-level phosphorylation in glycolysis and acid-forming pathways. When designing experiments to study C. beijerinckii ATP synthase, researchers should consider this metabolic context. In contrast to oxidative phosphorylation in aerobes, the F-type ATP synthase in some Clostridium species may function in the reverse direction, hydrolyzing ATP to maintain membrane potential or regulate pH homeostasis, particularly during different growth phases .

What structural features characterize the subunit c (atpE) in Clostridium species?

Subunit c (atpE) in Clostridium species typically forms an oligomeric c-ring embedded in the membrane. In C. paradoxum, this structure appears as a stable oligomeric c-ring that can be dissociated into monomeric c subunits using trichloroacetic acid treatment . The c subunit in some Clostridium species functions as a DCCD-binding proteolipid, which is critical for proton translocation . Additionally, in C. paradoxum, the c subunit contains a sodium-binding motif (Q28, E61, and S62) , suggesting that some Clostridium ATP synthases may use sodium ions rather than protons as coupling ions. When studying C. beijerinckii atpE, researchers should examine the primary sequence for conserved ion-binding residues to determine if it uses proton or sodium gradients.

What expression systems are most suitable for recombinant production of C. beijerinckii atpE?

For recombinant expression of membrane proteins like atpE, E. coli remains the preferred expression system due to its simplicity and scalability. When designing expression constructs, researchers should consider using specialized E. coli strains like T7 Express lysY/Iq, which provide tight control of expression and are suitable for potentially toxic proteins . Fusion protein strategies using vectors like pMAL-c2x (MBP fusion) or pET-32a(+) (thioredoxin fusion) can enhance solubility and expression levels . For challenging membrane proteins like atpE, co-expression with chaperone proteins such as DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE using an additional plasmid (e.g., pOFXT7KJE3) can substantially increase recombinant protein yields .

How can codon optimization impact the expression of C. beijerinckii atpE in heterologous systems?

Codon optimization is critical when expressing Clostridium genes in E. coli due to differences in codon usage between these organisms. This optimization should account for the GC content difference between Clostridium (typically low GC) and E. coli (moderate GC). When designing synthetic genes for atpE expression, researchers should analyze the native sequence for rare codons and optimize accordingly while preserving key functional motifs. The methodology should include: (1) analyzing codon adaptation index and optimizing to E. coli preference, (2) eliminating potential RNA secondary structures and internal Shine-Dalgarno sequences, and (3) preserving critical amino acid sequences involved in ion binding and protein-protein interactions within the ATP synthase complex.

What are the most effective methods for purifying recombinant atpE from E. coli expression systems?

Purification of recombinant atpE requires specialized approaches due to its hydrophobic nature. A recommended methodology includes: (1) Cell lysis using French press or sonication in buffer containing gentle detergents like n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) or CHAPS; (2) Differential centrifugation to separate membrane fractions; (3) Solubilization of membrane proteins using appropriate detergents; (4) Affinity chromatography using tags incorporated in the expression construct; and (5) Size exclusion chromatography for final purification. For fusion protein constructs, consider on-column cleavage of fusion partners to retain solubility during purification . Special attention should be paid to maintaining the oligomeric state of atpE if studying the c-ring structure, as seen in C. paradoxum where stable c-rings were observed .

How can researchers effectively analyze the oligomeric state of purified atpE proteins?

Analyzing the oligomeric state of atpE is crucial since it naturally forms a ring structure within the ATP synthase complex. A comprehensive approach includes: (1) Blue Native PAGE to visualize intact c-rings under non-denaturing conditions; (2) Cross-linking studies using agents like glutaraldehyde followed by SDS-PAGE to capture oligomeric states; (3) Size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) for accurate molecular weight determination of oligomers in solution; (4) Analytical ultracentrifugation to determine sedimentation coefficients and assembly state; and (5) Electron microscopy (negative staining or cryo-EM) for direct visualization of c-ring structure. Researchers should note that the oligomeric state may depend on detergent choice and buffer conditions, as demonstrated in studies of other ATP synthase c subunits .

What methods can accurately assess ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activity of reconstituted C. beijerinckii ATP synthase?

Functional characterization of ATP synthase activity requires reconstitution into a membrane environment. The methodology should include: (1) Reconstitution of purified enzyme into liposomes using detergent removal techniques (dialysis, Bio-Beads, or gel filtration); (2) For ATP hydrolysis assays, use coupled enzyme systems (pyruvate kinase/lactate dehydrogenase) to monitor ADP production spectrophotometrically; (3) For ATP synthesis, generate artificial ion gradients across liposome membranes and measure ATP production using luciferase assays; (4) Assess the effect of specific inhibitors (DCCD, oligomycin) to confirm ATP synthase-specific activity; and (5) Determine optimal pH, temperature, and ion concentrations for maximum activity, considering C. beijerinckii's natural environment. Data should be presented as specific activity (μmol ATP/min/mg protein) under various conditions.

What advanced techniques can resolve the structure of C. beijerinckii atpE and its oligomeric ring?

Structural determination of atpE and its oligomeric c-ring requires complementary approaches. A comprehensive strategy includes: (1) X-ray crystallography after purification and crystallization trials with various detergents and lipid additives; (2) Cryo-electron microscopy, which has revolutionized membrane protein structure determination, especially for protein complexes like the c-ring; (3) Solid-state NMR spectroscopy for specific structural details, particularly regarding ion-binding sites; (4) Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify solvent-accessible regions and conformational changes; and (5) Molecular dynamics simulations based on homology models from closely related Clostridium species to predict structure-function relationships. Each technique provides complementary information, and researchers should consider multiple approaches for comprehensive structural characterization.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be used to identify critical residues in C. beijerinckii atpE?

Site-directed mutagenesis offers powerful insights into atpE function. A systematic approach includes: (1) Sequence alignment with related Clostridium species to identify conserved residues, particularly focusing on potential ion-binding sites similar to those in C. paradoxum (Q28, E61, and S62) ; (2) Creating alanine-scanning mutants of conserved residues; (3) Generating specific mutations that change ion specificity (e.g., modifying putative Na+-binding residues); (4) Expressing wild-type and mutant proteins under identical conditions for direct comparison; and (5) Assessing the impact of mutations on expression levels, oligomerization, and ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activities. Results should be analyzed statistically across multiple experiments to ensure reproducibility. This approach can definitively link specific residues to function and provide mechanistic insights into ion translocation.

How does C. beijerinckii ATP synthase compare with other Clostridium species in terms of structure and function?

Comparative analysis across Clostridium species reveals important insights about evolutionary conservation and specialization. The methodology includes: (1) Phylogenetic analysis of atpE sequences from multiple Clostridium species including C. acetobutylicum, C. pasteurianum, C. paradoxum, and C. beijerinckii; (2) Comparison of ATP synthase operon organization across species, noting that C. pasteurianum follows the typical bacterial arrangement (atpIBEFHAGDC) ; (3) Functional comparison of ATP synthase activity, considering that C. acetobutylicum relies more on acid-forming pathways than ATPase for ATP metabolism ; (4) Analysis of ion specificity, noting that C. paradoxum ATP synthase is stimulated by sodium ions ; and (5) Correlation of ATP synthase properties with ecological niches and metabolic strategies of each species.

What are the key differences between C. beijerinckii ATP synthase and those from non-Clostridium species?

Understanding the unique features of C. beijerinckii ATP synthase requires comparison with diverse organisms. The analytical approach includes: (1) Comparative sequence analysis of atpE from C. beijerinckii, other anaerobes, facultative anaerobes like E. coli, and aerobes; (2) Structural comparison of c-ring stoichiometry, which varies across species and affects the ATP/ion ratio; (3) Comparison of ion specificity (H+ vs. Na+) and correlation with environmental adaptations; (4) Analysis of regulatory mechanisms across diverse metabolic backgrounds; and (5) Examination of post-translational modifications that might occur in different organisms. This comparative analysis should be presented in a comprehensive table highlighting key differences in sequence features, structural elements, and functional properties across diverse taxonomic groups.

How can C. beijerinckii atpE be engineered for enhanced bioenergy applications?

Engineering atpE for bioenergy applications requires understanding structure-function relationships. The methodology includes: (1) Rational design based on structural knowledge to modify ion specificity or improve catalytic efficiency; (2) Directed evolution approaches using error-prone PCR followed by screening for desired properties; (3) Creation of chimeric proteins by combining domains from different species to obtain hybrid properties; (4) Investigation of mutations that might decouple ATP synthesis from ion gradients, potentially increasing metabolic efficiency; and (5) Integration of engineered atpE into synthetic biology circuits for novel energy conservation strategies. The success of engineered variants should be evaluated through comprehensive biochemical characterization and in vivo metabolic impact assessment.

What insights can systems biology approaches provide about the role of ATP synthase in C. beijerinckii metabolism?

Systems biology offers comprehensive insights into ATP synthase function within the cellular context. The methodology includes: (1) Transcriptomic analysis to determine how atp operon expression changes under different growth conditions; (2) Proteomic studies to quantify ATP synthase subunit abundance and identify interaction partners; (3) Metabolomic analysis to correlate ATP synthase activity with metabolic flux; (4) Genome-scale metabolic modeling to predict the impact of ATP synthase modifications on cell physiology; and (5) Integration of multi-omics data to create predictive models of energy metabolism. This approach can reveal regulatory networks controlling ATP synthase expression and activity, potentially identifying novel targets for metabolic engineering.

What are the common challenges in recombinant expression of C. beijerinckii atpE and how can they be overcome?

Recombinant expression of membrane proteins like atpE presents several challenges. The troubleshooting approach includes: (1) Addressing toxicity issues by using tightly regulated expression systems and lower growth temperatures; (2) Resolving inclusion body formation through co-expression with chaperones like DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE, as demonstrated for other challenging proteins ; (3) Optimizing membrane integration by using specialized E. coli strains or fusion partners that enhance membrane targeting; (4) Addressing proteolytic degradation through protease-deficient host strains; and (5) Improving protein stability by screening various detergents and buffer conditions. Researchers should systematically test multiple expression conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, host strain) and document their effects on expression yield and protein quality.

What strategies can improve the yield and stability of purified recombinant atpE?

Optimizing purification conditions is crucial for obtaining functional atpE. The methodology includes: (1) Screening different detergents at various concentrations to identify those that maintain protein stability without excessive delipidation; (2) Testing stabilizing additives including glycerol, specific lipids, and ion cofactors based on C. beijerinckii's natural environment; (3) Optimizing buffer components (pH, salt concentration, reducing agents) through systematic variation; (4) Investigating the impact of temperature on protein stability during purification; and (5) Developing rapid purification protocols to minimize exposure time to potentially destabilizing conditions. Protein stability should be monitored through activity assays, circular dichroism, and thermal shift assays at each optimization step. The collective data should be presented in a comprehensive stability profile under various conditions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.