Recombinant Coxiella burnetii 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase (gpmI), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
gpmI; CBU_1536; 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase; BPG-independent PGAM; Phosphoglyceromutase; iPGM; EC 5.4.2.12
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Coxiella burnetii (strain RSA 493 / Nine Mile phase I)
Target Names
gpmI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein catalyzes the interconversion of 2-phosphoglycerate and 3-phosphoglycerate.

Database Links
Protein Families
BPG-independent phosphoglycerate mutase family

Q&A

What is the functional role of gpmI in Coxiella burnetii metabolism?

The 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase (gpmI) in C. burnetii catalyzes the reversible conversion of 3-phosphoglycerate to 2-phosphoglycerate in the glycolytic pathway. Unlike the dependent form of the enzyme found in mammals, the independent form (gpmI) does not require 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate as a cofactor for activity. This enzyme represents a critical component of central carbon metabolism in C. burnetii, enabling the organism to generate energy through glycolysis during intracellular replication within host cell parasitophorous vacuoles. The metabolic pathways in C. burnetii are particularly important given its adaptation to the intracellular lifestyle, which requires specialized metabolism to thrive in the acidic environment of host cell phagolysosomes .

What challenges exist in expressing recombinant C. burnetii proteins?

Expression of recombinant C. burnetii proteins presents several methodological challenges. As an obligate intracellular bacterium, C. burnetii has evolved to function optimally within the unique environment of the host cell vacuole. Key considerations when expressing recombinant gpmI include:

  • Codon optimization: C. burnetii has a G+C content of 42.5-42.9% , which differs from common expression hosts like E. coli, potentially requiring codon optimization.

  • Protein folding: The intracellular environment of C. burnetii's natural habitat differs significantly from standard expression systems, potentially affecting proper folding.

  • Post-translational modifications: Any native modifications may be absent in heterologous expression systems.

  • Biosafety considerations: Working with C. burnetii genes requires awareness of biosafety regulations, as the native organism requires BSL3 conditions for propagation .

The recommended approach involves testing multiple expression systems (bacterial, yeast, or insect cells) with various affinity tags to identify optimal conditions for producing functional enzyme.

What are the optimal methods for detecting C. burnetii gpmI expression?

Detection of recombinant gpmI expression can be accomplished through several complementary approaches:

  • Immunological detection: Western blotting using antibodies against the recombinant protein or attached affinity tags (His, GST, etc.)

  • Activity assays: Enzymatic assays measuring the conversion of 3-phosphoglycerate to 2-phosphoglycerate

  • Mass spectrometry: For protein identification and verification of sequence integrity

  • qPCR: For measuring gene expression levels if working with the native gene in C. burnetii

When working with the native organism, researchers can adapt highly sensitive qPCR methodologies similar to those developed for detecting C. burnetii in clinical and environmental samples. These assays have demonstrated high efficiency, requiring only approximately 10 gene copies per reaction with high reproducibility . For recombinant protein work, a combination of activity assays and protein detection methods provides the most comprehensive validation.

How can researchers optimize purification of recombinant C. burnetii gpmI?

Purification of recombinant gpmI requires a tailored approach based on the protein's characteristics:

Table 1: Recommended Purification Strategy for Recombinant C. burnetii gpmI

Purification StepMethodParametersNotes
Initial CaptureImmobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC)pH 7.5-8.0, 300mM NaClOptimal for His-tagged constructs
Intermediate PurificationIon Exchange ChromatographyBased on predicted pIRemoves contaminants with different charge properties
PolishingSize Exclusion ChromatographyPBS or similar bufferSeparates by molecular weight, removes aggregates
Quality ControlSDS-PAGE and Western Blot-Confirms purity and identity
Activity VerificationEnzymatic AssaypH 6.5-7.5Confirms functional integrity

Throughout purification, buffer optimization is critical as the enzyme typically functions in the acidic environment of the C. burnetii-containing vacuole. Testing enzyme activity across a range of pH values (5.0-7.5) can provide valuable insights into functional characteristics relevant to the pathogen's lifecycle.

What enzyme assay systems are most appropriate for characterizing C. burnetii gpmI activity?

Several complementary approaches can be employed to characterize gpmI enzymatic activity:

  • Coupled spectrophotometric assays: Measure the formation of 2-phosphoglycerate by coupling to enolase and pyruvate kinase reactions, with NADH oxidation monitored at 340nm.

  • Direct product measurement: Use 31P-NMR spectroscopy to directly observe the conversion between 3-phosphoglycerate and 2-phosphoglycerate.

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): For detailed kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of substrate binding and catalysis.

Careful consideration of reaction conditions is essential, particularly pH optimization, as C. burnetii naturally exists in an acidic environment. Comparative analysis of kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat) between recombinant gpmI and known phosphoglycerate mutases from other organisms can provide insights into the enzyme's adaptation to C. burnetii's intracellular lifestyle.

How might gpmI contribute to C. burnetii pathogenesis and survival in different host environments?

The contribution of gpmI to C. burnetii pathogenesis likely centers on its role in central carbon metabolism, which is critical for bacterial survival and replication in diverse host environments. Metabolic adaptation is a key feature of C. burnetii's ability to establish persistent infections and potentially transition between acute and chronic disease states .

Research approaches to investigate this question include:

  • Gene knockout/knockdown studies: Using recently developed genetic systems for C. burnetii to assess the impact of reduced gpmI function on bacterial survival in different cell types

  • Metabolomic profiling: Comparing metabolite levels between wild-type and gpmI-mutant strains to understand metabolic pathway alterations

  • Host-pathogen interaction studies: Assessing whether gpmI activity influences the composition of the parasitophorous vacuole or interactions with host immune components

The fact that C. burnetii can cause both acute and persistent focalized infections suggests differential metabolic requirements across disease states . Research exploring potential regulatory mechanisms of gpmI across these states could provide insights into pathogenesis mechanisms.

What structural features distinguish C. burnetii gpmI from host phosphoglycerate mutases?

The 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase (gpmI) belongs to a different structural family than the dependent form found in mammals, making it an attractive potential drug target. Key methods for structural characterization include:

  • X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to determine the tertiary structure

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to analyze catalytic mechanisms

  • Structure-based virtual screening to identify potential inhibitors

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted active site residues to confirm functional importance

A methodological approach would begin with homology modeling based on related bacterial phosphoglycerate mutases if crystal structures are unavailable, followed by experimental validation. Comparative analysis with host enzymes would focus on identifying unique binding pockets or catalytic features that could be exploited for selective inhibition.

How does gpmI expression vary across different C. burnetii genotypes associated with varying disease presentations?

C. burnetii exhibits significant genomic diversity with multiple genotypes associated with different clinical manifestations . Research approaches to examine potential variation in gpmI expression include:

  • Transcriptomic analysis of different C. burnetii strains under standardized conditions

  • qPCR measurement of gpmI expression levels across clinical isolates

  • Correlation of expression patterns with genomic groups and plasmid types

  • In vitro growth and metabolic assays comparing different genotypes

Previous research has demonstrated associations between plasmid types and disease presentations, with QpH1 and QpDV plasmids associated with acute Q fever and QpRS associated with persistent focalized infections . Whether these genomic differences affect metabolic enzyme expression, including gpmI, remains an important research question. Methodologically, this would require accessing diverse clinical isolates representing the major genomic groups and plasmid types for comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses.

What mutagenesis approaches are most suitable for structure-function studies of C. burnetii gpmI?

Structure-function analysis of gpmI requires systematic mutagenesis approaches:

Table 2: Mutagenesis Strategies for gpmI Functional Analysis

ApproachApplicationAdvantagesLimitations
Site-directed mutagenesisTargeted modification of predicted active site residuesPrecise control over mutationsRequires structural knowledge
Alanine scanningSystematic replacement of residues with alanineIdentifies functionally important residuesLabor-intensive
Domain swappingExchanging domains with related enzymesIdentifies domain-specific functionsComplex interpretation
Random mutagenesisGeneration of diverse mutant librariesCan reveal unexpected functional regionsRequires high-throughput screening

For site-directed mutagenesis, prioritize conserved residues in the active site based on sequence alignments with related phosphoglycerate mutases. Following mutagenesis, comprehensive enzymatic characterization should include determination of kinetic parameters (Km, kcat) and thermostability analysis to assess the impact of mutations on enzyme function and stability.

How can isotope labeling be used to track C. burnetii metabolic activity in infection models?

Isotope labeling provides powerful insights into metabolic pathways and can be applied to study C. burnetii gpmI function during infection:

  • 13C-labeled glucose tracing: Follow carbon flux through glycolysis to assess gpmI activity in vivo

  • Heavy nitrogen (15N) labeling: Monitor amino acid synthesis dependent on glycolytic intermediates

  • Metabolic flux analysis: Quantify pathway activities during different stages of infection

What biosafety considerations apply when working with recombinant C. burnetii proteins?

While recombinant proteins themselves generally don't pose the same risks as live C. burnetii, proper biosafety practices remain important:

  • Risk assessment: Evaluate potential hazards based on the protein's function

  • Containment measures: Work in appropriate biosafety cabinets for protein purification

  • Decontamination protocols: Establish procedures for equipment and waste management

  • Training requirements: Ensure personnel understand C. burnetii-specific risks

What analytical approaches best characterize the kinetic properties of recombinant gpmI?

Comprehensive kinetic analysis of gpmI requires multiple analytical approaches:

  • Steady-state kinetics: Determine Km, Vmax, and kcat under varying substrate concentrations

  • pH-dependent activity profiling: Assess enzyme performance across pH 5.0-8.0 to reflect different host environments

  • Inhibition studies: Characterize responses to potential inhibitors or regulatory molecules

  • Temperature-dependent activity analysis: Evaluate thermal stability and temperature optima

Data analysis should employ appropriate enzyme kinetics models, including:

  • Michaelis-Menten analysis for standard substrate-velocity relationships

  • Lineweaver-Burk, Eadie-Hofstee, or Hanes-Woolf plots for visualization and parameter determination

  • Non-linear regression for accurate parameter estimation

Statistical approaches should include replicate measurements (minimum n=3) with calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for all kinetic parameters.

How can computational approaches enhance understanding of gpmI function in C. burnetii?

Computational methods provide valuable insights when experimental data is limited:

A methodological workflow would begin with sequence-based analysis (conserved domains, active site prediction), proceed to structural modeling, and culminate in simulation of enzyme-substrate interactions. Integration with experimental data at each step improves model accuracy and biological relevance. These approaches are particularly valuable given the challenges of working with C. burnetii, which requires BSL3 conditions for propagation .

What comparative genomic approaches can reveal the evolution of gpmI in C. burnetii?

Given C. burnetii's high genomic plasticity and open pangenome , evolutionary analysis of gpmI can provide insights into adaptation and specialization:

  • Phylogenetic analysis: Compare gpmI sequences across bacterial species to trace evolutionary history

  • Selection pressure analysis: Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify conserved functional regions

  • Comparative genomics across C. burnetii strains: Examine gpmI sequence conservation in relation to the core genome (1,211 genes) versus the flexible genome

  • Horizontal gene transfer analysis: Assess whether gpmI exhibits evidence of acquisition from other species

Methodologically, this requires extracting and aligning gpmI sequences from the 75+ available C. burnetii genomes representing diverse genotypes (MST types) and plasmid types . Statistical approaches including maximum likelihood phylogeny construction and Bayesian analysis can reveal evolutionary relationships and potential adaptive changes in this metabolic enzyme across different lineages of this important pathogen.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.