KEGG: cbu:CBU_0271
STRING: 227377.CBU_0271
What is the structure and function of Coxiella burnetii single-stranded DNA-binding protein (ssb)?
Coxiella burnetii ssb is a critical component of the bacterium's DNA metabolism machinery. It plays an important role in DNA replication, recombination, and repair processes by binding to ssDNA and recruiting partner proteins to their sites of action . The protein likely forms homooligomeric structures similar to other bacterial SSBs that coat and protect ssDNA intermediates during genome maintenance reactions .
C. burnetii ssb binds to ssDNA during replication, recombination, and repair processes, protecting it from nuclease degradation and preventing the formation of secondary structures. The cooperative binding mechanism involves a "bridge interface" that links adjacent SSB tetramers on the ssDNA, which is critical for its function in maintaining genomic integrity, especially in the hostile environment of the parasitophorous vacuole within host cells .
How does C. burnetii DNA repair differ from other bacterial systems?
C. burnetii possesses unique DNA repair adaptations that distinguish it from other bacterial systems:
| Repair Component | C. burnetii | E. coli (Reference) | Functional Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| RecA | Present | Present | DNA strand exchange, SOS response |
| RuvABC | Present | Present | Holliday junction resolution |
| LexA | Absent | Present | Results in constitutive SOS gene expression in C. burnetii |
| RecBCD | Absent | Present | Double-strand break repair |
| AddAB | Present | Absent | Functional equivalent to RecBCD |
C. burnetii has evolved unique repair adaptations, including constitutive SOS gene expression due to the lack of LexA and induction of AddAB under oxidative stress, unlike the non-inducible E. coli recBCD . These adaptations likely reflect the bacterium's need to maintain genomic integrity in the harsh environment of the macrophage parasitophorous vacuole with lysosomal characteristics .
What methods are recommended for expressing and purifying recombinant C. burnetii ssb?
Based on published protocols for C. burnetii proteins, recombinant ssb can be efficiently expressed and purified using the following optimized methodology:
Cloning strategy:
Amplify the ssb gene (CBU_1779/CBUD_1779) from C. burnetii genomic DNA
Clone into an expression vector with an affinity tag (His-tag or GST-tag)
Expression conditions:
Transform into E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar expression strain
Induce with 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at OD₆₀₀ of 0.6-0.8
Express at lower temperatures (16-25°C) to enhance solubility
Purification protocol:
Lyse cells in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF
Purify using affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins)
Further purify by ion-exchange and/or size-exclusion chromatography
Concentrate protein and store in buffer with 50% glycerol at -80°C
This approach has been successful for other C. burnetii proteins and should be adaptable for ssb .
What is the role of C. burnetii ssb in bacterial adaptation to environmental stresses?
C. burnetii is exposed to various stresses throughout its lifecycle, including the oxidative environment within macrophages and temperature fluctuations during transmission. The ssb protein plays a critical role in maintaining genomic integrity under these conditions by:
Protecting ssDNA during stress responses: During temperature stress, C. burnetii exhibits minor changes in gene regulation , but DNA repair mechanisms remain essential.
Supporting lifecycle transitions: C. burnetii transitions between a metabolically active large-cell variant (LCV) and a spore-like, quiescent small-cell variant (SCV) . These transitions involve DNA replication and repair processes where ssb is likely crucial.
Oxidative stress response: C. burnetii's DNA repair systems, including ssb-mediated processes, help maintain genomic integrity against oxidative damage in the parasitophorous vacuole .
The constitutive expression of SOS genes in C. burnetii (due to lexA absence) suggests that ssb and other DNA repair proteins are constantly available to respond to ongoing environmental stresses, representing a unique adaptation to its intracellular lifestyle .
How does cooperative DNA binding by C. burnetii ssb differ from other bacterial SSBs?
Cooperative DNA binding is a critical property of bacterial SSB proteins. While specific data for C. burnetii ssb is limited, insights can be drawn from structural studies of other bacterial SSBs:
| Feature | Description | Research Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Bridge Interface | An evolutionarily conserved surface near the ssDNA-binding site that links adjacent SSB tetramers | X-ray crystallography of SSB-ssDNA complexes |
| DNA Binding Modes | Multiple binding modes that differ in the number of nucleotides bound per tetramer | Fluorescence spectroscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation |
| Cooperativity Parameters | Quantitative measure of binding cooperativity | Electrophoretic mobility shift assays, isothermal titration calorimetry |
To determine C. burnetii-specific properties, researchers should:
Express and purify recombinant C. burnetii ssb
Perform DNA binding assays using fluorescently labeled ssDNA oligonucleotides
Compare binding parameters with well-characterized SSBs from E. coli or B. subtilis
Attempt crystallization of C. burnetii ssb with ssDNA to resolve the structure of the bridge interface
Mutations in the bridge interface residues of C. burnetii ssb would likely reduce binding cooperativity and alter DNA binding modes, similar to observations with E. coli SSB variants .
What experimental approaches can determine how the absence of LexA affects ssb expression in C. burnetii?
The absence of LexA in C. burnetii creates a unique regulatory environment for DNA repair genes. To investigate its impact on ssb expression:
Transcriptional analysis:
Quantitative RT-PCR to compare ssb expression levels between C. burnetii and other bacteria with LexA
RNA-seq to analyze the global transcriptional profile under normal conditions and after DNA damage
Reporter gene assays:
Clone the ssb promoter region upstream of a reporter gene (e.g., GFP or luciferase)
Introduce this construct into C. burnetii and a model organism with LexA (e.g., E. coli)
Compare baseline expression and response to DNA-damaging agents
Complementation studies:
ChIP-seq analysis:
Perform chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing to identify potential regulatory proteins that might bind to the ssb promoter in the absence of LexA
These approaches would help elucidate how ssb expression is regulated in C. burnetii despite lacking the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response system .
How does C. burnetii ssb interact with other DNA repair proteins like RecA and AddAB?
Understanding the interaction network of C. burnetii ssb is crucial for deciphering its role in DNA metabolism. Based on knowledge from other bacterial systems and the unique DNA repair mechanisms in C. burnetii:
| Protein Partner | Expected Interaction | Detection Method | Functional Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| RecA | Direct or indirect via adaptors | Pull-down assays, Y2H | Homologous recombination, SOS response |
| AddA/AddB | Potential direct interaction | Co-immunoprecipitation | Double-strand break processing |
| RuvA/RuvB | Potential interaction during recombination | FRET, BLI | Holliday junction resolution |
| DNA polymerase | Interaction with replicative polymerase | SPR, crosslinking MS | Coordination of replication |
To characterize these interactions:
Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express tagged ssb in C. burnetii or a surrogate host
Purify ssb complexes under near-native conditions
Identify interacting partners by mass spectrometry
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified ssb on a sensor chip
Flow potential partners (RecA, AddAB) over the surface
Measure binding kinetics and affinity constants
Bacterial Two-Hybrid:
Test binary interactions between ssb and other DNA repair proteins
Map interaction domains through truncation analysis
The AddAB system in C. burnetii, unlike E. coli's RecBCD, is upregulated under oxidative stress , suggesting potential coordinated regulation with ssb during DNA repair responses.
What are the potential applications of recombinant C. burnetii ssb in developing diagnostic tools for Q fever?
Recombinant C. burnetii proteins have shown promise as antigens for Q fever diagnostics. While ssb has not been specifically identified in immunoproteomic studies as a major immunodominant antigen, its potential utility can be evaluated:
Serological assay development:
Express and purify C. burnetii ssb with high purity
Develop ELISA, immunoblot, or protein microarray assays using the recombinant protein
Test against sera from acute and chronic Q fever patients
Advantages over whole-cell antigens:
Reduced cross-reactivity with other bacterial pathogens
No need to culture hazardous C. burnetii organisms
Potential differentiation between infection stages based on antibody profiles
Multiplex approach:
Potential for DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) diagnostics:
Immunoproteomic studies have identified approximately 50 C. burnetii proteins that strongly react with immune sera . Testing recombinant ssb alongside these known immunodominant antigens would determine its diagnostic value.
What structural modifications could enhance the stability and functionality of recombinant C. burnetii ssb?
Enhancing recombinant C. burnetii ssb stability and functionality requires rational protein engineering approaches:
| Modification Strategy | Implementation | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| N-terminal solubility tags | Fusion with MBP, SUMO, or TrxA | Improved solubility and expression yields |
| Thermostabilizing mutations | Site-directed mutagenesis of surface residues | Enhanced stability at elevated temperatures |
| Disulfide engineering | Introduction of strategically placed disulfide bonds | Increased structural rigidity |
| Surface entropy reduction | Replacement of high-entropy surface residues | Improved crystallization properties |
| DNA-binding optimization | Mutations in the DNA-binding interface | Enhanced or altered DNA binding properties |
Experimental approach:
Structure prediction and modeling:
Generate homology models based on known bacterial SSB structures
Identify regions for potential modification using computational tools
Stability screening:
Create a library of variants with different modifications
Screen for improved thermal stability using differential scanning fluorimetry
Assess functional stability through DNA binding assays
Activity optimization:
Test DNA binding properties using electrophoretic mobility shift assays
Verify cooperative binding behavior is maintained or enhanced
Confirm ability to interact with partner proteins remains intact
These modifications could prove valuable for both research applications and potential diagnostic or therapeutic development using C. burnetii ssb.
How can C. burnetii ssb be utilized as a target for antimicrobial development?
The essential role of ssb in DNA metabolism makes it a potential target for novel antimicrobials against C. burnetii:
Target validation:
Demonstrate essentiality using CRISPR interference or antisense RNA approaches
Identify whether ssb is accessible to inhibitors within the parasitophorous vacuole
Determine if inhibition of ssb function can clear persistent infection
Inhibitor screening strategies:
Develop high-throughput assays measuring ssb-ssDNA binding
Screen small molecule libraries for compounds that disrupt this interaction
Test peptide mimetics that interfere with ssb-protein interactions
Structure-based drug design:
Use structural information from crystallography or homology modeling
Identify potential binding pockets for small molecule inhibitors
Design compounds that specifically target C. burnetii ssb over human SSB
Evaluation in infection models:
Test candidate inhibitors in cell culture models of C. burnetii infection
Assess efficacy in animal models of acute and chronic Q fever
Determine pharmacokinetic properties and tissue distribution
The considerable differences between bacterial and eukaryotic single-stranded DNA-binding proteins provide an opportunity for selective targeting of C. burnetii ssb. Additionally, the unique properties of C. burnetii DNA repair systems, including constitutive SOS expression , may make ssb inhibition particularly effective against this pathogen.
What techniques can be used to study the protein-protein interactions of C. burnetii ssb?
Multiple complementary techniques can be employed to comprehensively map the protein interaction network of C. burnetii ssb:
Affinity Purification coupled with Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express His-tagged or FLAG-tagged ssb in heterologous systems
Perform gentle cell lysis to preserve protein-protein interactions
Capture ssb complexes using affinity resins
Identify binding partners by LC-MS/MS
Quantify enrichment relative to control pulldowns
Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry:
Treat samples with chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient interactions
Digest crosslinked complexes and identify crosslinked peptides by MS
Map interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI):
Immobilize purified ssb on sensor surfaces
Measure real-time binding kinetics with potential partners
Determine association and dissociation rate constants
Calculate binding affinities (KD values)
Fluorescence-based techniques:
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) between labeled proteins
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) for binding affinity measurements
Fluorescence Polarization (FP) for measuring interactions with small molecules
Computational prediction:
Utilize protein docking simulations
Predict interaction surfaces based on conserved domains
Guide experimental validation of predicted interactions
The integration of these techniques would provide a comprehensive understanding of how C. burnetii ssb interfaces with the DNA repair machinery and other cellular processes in this unique intracellular pathogen.
How should experiments be designed to analyze C. burnetii ssb expression under different stress conditions?
To systematically analyze C. burnetii ssb expression under different stress conditions relevant to its lifecycle:
Experimental Design Framework:
Stress Conditions to Test:
Oxidative stress (H₂O₂, paraquat)
Acid stress (pH 4.5-5.5, mimicking the parasitophorous vacuole)
Nutrient limitation
Temperature stress (heat shock at 42°C, cold shock at 4°C)
DNA-damaging agents (UV, mitomycin C, methyl methanesulfonate)
Cell Culture Models:
Axenic ACCM-2 medium culture of C. burnetii
Infected cell lines (THP-1 macrophages, Vero cells)
Primary macrophages from different sources
Expression Analysis Methods:
qRT-PCR for ssb mRNA quantification
Western blotting with anti-ssb antibodies
Promoter-reporter fusions (if genetic manipulation is available)
RNA-seq for global transcriptional response
Experimental Protocol:
Grow C. burnetii to mid-log phase
Apply stress treatments for varying durations
Extract RNA for transcript analysis
Harvest protein for Western blot analysis
Compare results to unstressed controls and other DNA metabolism genes
Data Analysis:
Normalize expression to reference genes stable under stress conditions
Perform statistical analysis (ANOVA with post-hoc tests)
Correlate ssb expression with other DNA repair genes
Compare responses to those observed in other bacteria with different SOS regulation
Since C. burnetii exhibits minor changes in gene regulation under short exposure to temperature stress , extended stress periods and multiple stress types should be evaluated to capture the full regulatory response of ssb.
What are the recommended protocols for assessing C. burnetii ssb-DNA binding properties?
To comprehensively characterize the DNA binding properties of C. burnetii ssb:
Protocol Suite for DNA Binding Characterization:
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA):
Prepare fluorescently labeled ssDNA oligonucleotides of varying lengths
Incubate with increasing concentrations of purified ssb protein
Resolve complexes on native polyacrylamide gels
Quantify bound vs. unbound DNA to determine binding affinities
Fluorescence Anisotropy:
Label ssDNA with fluorescent dyes
Measure changes in anisotropy as ssb binds
Determine binding constants and cooperativity parameters
Test various salt concentrations to assess binding mode transitions
Single-Molecule Techniques:
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) to monitor protein-induced DNA conformational changes
Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to visualize individual ssb-DNA complexes
Magnetic or optical tweezers to measure ssb binding dynamics in real-time
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM):
Visualize ssb-DNA complexes at nanometer resolution
Assess protein binding patterns and cooperativity
Monitor structural changes in DNA upon ssb binding
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):
Determine thermodynamic parameters of binding
Measure stoichiometry, binding affinity, enthalpy, and entropy
Compare data with other bacterial SSBs
Analytical Ultracentrifugation:
Characterize ssb oligomerization state
Analyze ssb-DNA complex formation
Determine stoichiometry of binding
These complementary approaches would provide a comprehensive understanding of how C. burnetii ssb interacts with ssDNA, its binding modes, cooperativity, and potential unique properties compared to other bacterial SSBs .
How can researchers effectively study C. burnetii ssb function in the context of the bacterial SOS response?
Studying C. burnetii ssb within the context of its unique SOS response system requires specialized approaches:
Genetic complementation studies:
Express C. burnetii ssb in E. coli ssb mutants
Assess functional complementation under DNA damage conditions
Introduce C. burnetii AddAB system to evaluate coordinated function with ssb
DNA damage response analysis:
Expose C. burnetii to DNA-damaging agents (UV, mitomycin C, MMS)
Monitor ssb expression relative to known SOS genes
Compare with E. coli response to identify LexA-independent regulation
Protein interaction mapping:
Identify binding partners of ssb after DNA damage
Determine if interaction networks change during stress response
Map regulatory proteins that might control ssb in absence of LexA
Axenic culture system for direct manipulation:
Utilize ACCM-2 medium for growing C. burnetii outside host cells
Apply CRISPR interference to modulate ssb expression
Monitor effects on growth and survival after DNA damage
Host cell infection models:
Infect macrophages with wild-type C. burnetii and ssb-modulated strains
Assess intracellular survival and replication
Measure oxidative stress response and DNA damage repair efficiency
This integrated approach would help elucidate how C. burnetii ssb functions within the bacterium's unique constitutive SOS expression system, particularly in relation to the AddAB recombinational repair system that is upregulated under oxidative stress .
What approaches should be used to develop C. burnetii ssb as a vaccine antigen candidate?
Although not identified among the top immunodominant C. burnetii antigens in previous studies , ssb could be systematically evaluated as a vaccine antigen using the following approach:
Immunogenicity assessment:
Express and purify recombinant C. burnetii ssb
Immunize mice using different adjuvants
Measure antibody titers using ELISA
Assess T-cell responses through cytokine profiling and proliferation assays
Protective efficacy evaluation:
Challenge immunized animals with virulent C. burnetii
Monitor bacterial load in tissues
Assess pathological changes and disease symptoms
Compare protection with existing vaccines (e.g., Q-Vax, Coxevac)
Antigen optimization:
Identify immunodominant epitopes within ssb
Create epitope-focused constructs for enhanced immunogenicity
Test multi-epitope vaccines combining ssb with other immunodominant antigens
Evaluate different delivery platforms (protein, DNA, viral vectors)
Safety profile characterization:
Assess reactogenicity in previously sensitized animals
Evaluate autoimmune potential through cross-reactivity studies
Determine stability and optimal formulation
DIVA capability testing:
Develop serological assays to differentiate vaccinated from infected animals
Evaluate in field studies in endemic regions
Previous attempts to develop Q fever vaccines using recombinant C. burnetii proteins (including Omp, HspB, and others) have shown limited success , suggesting that ssb would likely need to be part of a multi-antigen approach rather than used as a single antigen.
Human Vaccines Home