Recombinant Cyanidioschyzon merolae 30S ribosomal protein S8, chloroplastic (rps8)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for fulfillment according to your requirements.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is requested in advance. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. Please specify your required tag type for preferential development.
Synonyms
rps8; 30S ribosomal protein S8; chloroplastic
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-117
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Cyanidioschyzon merolae (strain 10D) (Red alga)
Target Names
rps8
Target Protein Sequence
MDTLSQMLTK IRNAQMARHR WVLVPASRMN WNVAQVLREE GLIAQVQPAD LHLRIQLKPK RIQRIWRVSK PGLRIYSSYK NMPKVLGMLI ISTSKGVMTH QKAKQMQVGG EILCGVY
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
A key rRNA-binding protein, it directly interacts with the 16S rRNA central domain, facilitating the assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit platform.
Database Links
Protein Families
Universal ribosomal protein uS8 family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast.

Q&A

What is Cyanidioschyzon merolae and why is it valuable as a model organism for RPS8 studies?

Cyanidioschyzon merolae is a unicellular red alga from the phylum Rhodophyta, considered one of the most primitive red algae. It thrives in extreme acidic hot springs (pH 0.2-4) at temperatures of 40-56°C . Its value as a model organism stems from its remarkably simple cellular architecture and genetic makeup:

  • Possesses only a single nucleus, single mitochondrion, and single chloroplast

  • Contains an extremely compact nuclear genome (16.5 Mb with 4,775 genes)

  • Features minimal intron content (only 38 introns)

  • Demonstrates stable transgene expression and capacity for homologous recombination

  • Shows high degree of gene compaction with short intergenic distances (approximately 40% of protein genes overlap in the plastid genome)

These characteristics make it an ideal system for studying fundamental biological processes, including the function of ribosomal proteins like RPS8 in a simplified eukaryotic context .

What is the role of chloroplastic 30S ribosomal protein S8 in C. merolae?

The 30S ribosomal protein S8 (RPS8) plays critical roles in chloroplast function:

  • Serves as an essential component of the small (30S) ribosomal subunit in chloroplasts

  • Participates in 30S ribosomal subunit assembly and stabilization

  • Functions in the chloroplast translation machinery

  • May contribute to environmental stress responses, particularly cold tolerance (based on findings in rice)

Unlike some other ribosomal proteins that have been transferred to the nuclear genome during evolution, the gene encoding RPS8 (rps8) remains in the chloroplast genome in C. merolae and other photosynthetic organisms . This conservation suggests an essential function that cannot be easily replaced by nuclear-encoded alternatives.

How does the genome structure of C. merolae facilitate recombinant RPS8 studies?

The unique genomic architecture of C. merolae offers several advantages for recombinant RPS8 studies:

  • Small nuclear genome (16.5 Mb) simplifies genetic manipulation and analysis

  • Low intron content reduces complications in gene expression studies

  • Stable transgene expression enables reliable phenotypic analysis

  • Capacity for homologous recombination allows precise genetic modifications

  • Rapid transformation protocols yield transformants in under two weeks

  • Available synthetic modular plasmid toolkit facilitates diverse experimental designs

These features collectively enable efficient genetic engineering approaches, making C. merolae an excellent platform for studying RPS8 function through recombinant DNA techniques.

What methods are available for expressing recombinant RPS8 in C. merolae chloroplasts?

Several established methods enable efficient expression of recombinant proteins, including RPS8, in C. merolae chloroplasts:

Transformation protocols:

  • PEG-mediated transformation is the primary method for chloroplast transformation

  • CAT (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) serves as an effective selectable marker

  • Optimized protocols yield transformants in under two weeks

Expression systems:

  • Three characterized chloroplast promoters with different expression patterns :

PromoterSource GeneExpression PatternApplication
PpsbDPhotosystem II D2 proteinLight-dependentLight-regulated expression
PrbcLRuBisCO large chainCell cycle-dependentGrowth phase-specific expression
PdnaKHsp70-type chaperoneConstitutiveContinuous expression

Monitoring tools:

  • Fluorescent reporter systems for tracking expression

  • Techniques for fluorescence imaging at different scales

  • Methods for protein quantification (Western blotting, mass spectrometry)

The accumulation of recombinant proteins in chloroplasts can reach up to 70% of total soluble protein, making this an efficient expression platform .

How does RNA editing affect RPS8 function in photosynthetic organisms?

RNA editing plays a crucial role in modifying RPS8 transcripts, with significant functional implications:

  • In rice, RNA editing at position 182 of the rps8 transcript changes a serine codon to a leucine codon

  • This represents a non-conservative amino acid change from a polar (Ser) to a non-polar (Leu) residue

  • Rice accessions lacking this editing capability show cold sensitivity, developing an albino phenotype at 20°C

  • Expression of the edited RPS8 isoform in editing-deficient mutants restores chlorophyll production under cold conditions

Experimental evidence demonstrates that:

  • The editing defect correlates with impaired chloroplast translation capacity

  • The edited form likely enables proper protein folding and/or interaction within the ribosome

  • This post-transcriptional modification appears to be an important regulatory mechanism for environmental adaptation

While the search results don't directly confirm RNA editing of rps8 in C. merolae, the importance of this mechanism in other photosynthetic organisms suggests it may be relevant when studying RPS8 function across species.

How does the structure and organization of the rps8 gene differ in C. merolae compared to other photosynthetic organisms?

The rps8 gene in C. merolae shows distinctive structural characteristics compared to other photosynthetic organisms:

Location and genome context:

  • The rps8 gene is located in the chloroplast genome in C. merolae, as in other plants and algae

  • In the highly compact plastid genome of C. merolae (149,987 bp), genes are tightly packed with minimal intergenic spaces

  • Approximately 40% of protein-coding genes overlap in the C. merolae plastid genome, which may include rps8

  • An example of overlapping genes shown in the plastid genome involves rps17 and rpl14, where they share 38 bp

Conservation patterns:

  • Unlike some other ribosomal protein genes that have been transferred to the nucleus during evolution, rps8 remains in the chloroplast genome

  • There is no evidence in sequence databases for transferred copies of chloroplast rps8 in the nucleus of angiosperms

  • The retention of rps8 in the chloroplast genome across diverse photosynthetic lineages suggests its essential function cannot be easily replaced by nuclear-encoded alternatives

These structural features reflect the evolutionary history of the chloroplast genome and have implications for genetic engineering approaches targeting RPS8.

What experimental approaches can determine how RPS8 modifications affect ribosome assembly and function in C. merolae?

A comprehensive experimental framework to investigate RPS8 modifications includes:

Genetic engineering strategies:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis to create specific amino acid substitutions (e.g., mimicking edited forms found in other species)

  • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing for precise modifications of the endogenous rps8 gene

  • Construction of chimeric RPS8 proteins with domains from different species

  • Expression of tagged versions for purification and interaction studies

Functional analysis:

  • Polysome profiling to assess ribosome assembly and translation efficiency:

    • Sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation for separating ribosomal subunits, monosomes, and polysomes

    • Northern blot or qRT-PCR analysis of specific mRNAs across gradient fractions

    • Measurement of translation rates using radiolabeled amino acids

  • Stress response testing:

    • Growth curve analysis under various temperatures (especially cold stress)

    • Photosynthetic efficiency measurements (oxygen evolution, chlorophyll fluorescence)

    • Reactive oxygen species detection and quantification

Structural studies:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy of ribosomes containing modified RPS8

  • Mass spectrometry to identify protein-protein interactions

  • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess structural changes

Comparative analysis:

  • Correlate functional changes with evolutionary conservation patterns

  • Compare results with data from other organisms (e.g., rice, E. coli)

This multifaceted approach would provide comprehensive insights into how specific modifications of RPS8 impact ribosome structure, assembly, and function in C. merolae.

How might recombinant RPS8 be utilized to engineer cold-tolerant strains of C. merolae?

Based on findings that RPS8 editing affects cold tolerance in rice , engineering cold-tolerant C. merolae strains through RPS8 modifications presents an intriguing research direction:

Engineering strategies:

  • Identification of crucial amino acid residues:

    • Comparative analysis of RPS8 sequences from cold-adapted vs. thermophilic species

    • Focus on non-conservative substitutions (e.g., Ser-to-Leu as observed in rice)

    • Structure-based prediction of residues involved in ribosome stability

  • Generation of modified RPS8 variants:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis targeting identified residues

    • Expression under control of appropriate promoters (constitutive or cold-inducible)

    • Integration into the chloroplast genome via homologous recombination

  • Validation experiments:

    • Growth assays at various temperatures (down to 20°C or lower)

    • Measurement of photosynthetic parameters under cold stress

    • Assessment of chloroplast translation efficiency at reduced temperatures

    • Quantification of cold-stress biomarkers (ROS, membrane integrity)

Expected outcomes and applications:

  • Identification of specific RPS8 residues critical for cold tolerance

  • Development of C. merolae strains with enhanced growth at lower temperatures

  • Potential applications in outdoor bioreactors in temperate climates

  • Insights applicable to engineering cold tolerance in crops

This approach combines fundamental ribosome biology with practical biotechnological applications while leveraging the genetic tractability of C. merolae.

What can comparative genomic analysis of RPS8 across red algae reveal about the evolution of translation machinery?

Comparative genomic analysis of RPS8 across red algal lineages can provide significant evolutionary insights:

Evolutionary patterns to investigate:

  • Sequence conservation analysis:

    • Identification of highly conserved functional domains across diverse red algae

    • Detection of lineage-specific adaptations correlated with ecological niches

    • Mapping of conservation patterns onto structural models of assembled ribosomes

  • Genomic context analysis:

    • Examination of gene neighborhood and synteny across species

    • Analysis of overlapping gene patterns (present in C. merolae)

    • Investigation of genome compaction trends

  • RNA editing patterns:

    • Identification of editing sites across species

    • Correlation between editing patterns and environmental adaptations

    • Analysis of co-evolution between editing mechanisms and ribosomal proteins

Phylogenetic implications:

  • Red algae (Rhodophyta) represent an early-diverging lineage of photosynthetic eukaryotes

  • C. merolae's position as a primitive red alga makes it particularly valuable for evolutionary studies

  • Analysis of RPS8 can help reconstruct the evolutionary trajectory of translation machinery from endosymbiotic chloroplast to modern photosynthetic organisms

  • Patterns may reveal selective pressures acting on translation machinery in different environments

How do dispersed repeat sequences in the C. merolae genome impact recombinant RPS8 expression strategies?

Recent research has revealed that dispersed repeat sequences comprise a significant portion of the C. merolae genome, with implications for recombinant protein expression:

Genomic repeat landscape:

  • Dispersed repeats constitute approximately 72% of the C. merolae genome

  • These repeats span 20 families with lengths ranging from 108 to 600 bp (average 522.54 bp)

  • Previous methods identified only about 28% of the genome as repetitive

  • The high repetitive content suggests a significant role in genome regulation

Impact on recombinant expression strategies:

AspectConsiderationsStrategic Approach
Integration sitesRepeats may facilitate unwanted recombinationTarget unique genomic regions for integration
Expression stabilityRepeats can influence chromatin structure and gene silencingMonitor expression over multiple generations
Homologous recombinationRepeats may cause off-target integrationDesign longer homology arms with unique sequences
Gene designRepetitive sequences within coding regions affect expressionOptimize codon usage and avoid repetitive elements

Experimental considerations:

  • Careful selection of integration sites to avoid disrupting essential genes

  • Thorough sequence analysis to identify unique genomic regions

  • Monitoring of genomic stability in transformants over multiple generations

  • Consideration of repeat-induced epigenetic effects on transgene expression

Understanding the impact of this extensive repetitive landscape is crucial for designing stable and efficient recombinant expression systems for RPS8 and other proteins in C. merolae.

What are the optimal conditions for expressing and purifying recombinant C. merolae RPS8 protein?

Based on C. merolae biology and established protocols, the following conditions are recommended for optimal expression and purification of recombinant RPS8:

Expression conditions:

  • Promoter selection: The constitutive PdnaK promoter provides stable expression, while the light-responsive PpsbD promoter offers inducible expression

  • Growth medium: Modified Allen's medium (MA2) at pH 2.5

  • Culture conditions: 42°C with continuous illumination at 50-100 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹

  • Oxygen supply: Gentle aeration to maintain dissolved oxygen levels

  • Harvesting time: Mid-logarithmic phase (OD750 of 0.8-1.0) for optimal yield

Purification strategy:

  • Cell lysis: Mechanical disruption (glass beads or sonication) in buffer containing detergents

  • Initial fractionation: Differential centrifugation to separate chloroplasts

  • Affinity purification options:

    • His-tagged RPS8 using Ni-NTA chromatography

    • Strep-tagged RPS8 using Strep-Tactin resins

  • Size exclusion chromatography for final purification

  • Protein quantification using Bradford or BCA assay

Quality control checks:

  • SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining to verify size and purity

  • Western blotting with anti-RPS8 antibodies

  • Mass spectrometry for identification confirmation

  • Functional assays for ribosome incorporation

These conditions should be optimized for each specific experimental setup, taking into account the particular RPS8 variant being expressed and the intended downstream applications.

How can fluorescent reporter systems be effectively used to study RPS8 expression and localization in C. merolae?

Fluorescent reporter systems provide powerful tools for studying RPS8 expression, localization, and function in C. merolae:

Reporter system design:

  • Fusion protein strategies:

    • C-terminal fusions to preserve chloroplast targeting

    • Inclusion of flexible linkers to minimize interference with function

    • Selection of appropriate fluorescent proteins (GFP variants, mCherry)

  • Promoter-reporter constructs:

    • RPS8 promoter driving fluorescent protein expression to study regulation

    • Bi-cistronic constructs with internal ribosome entry sites

Imaging techniques for C. merolae:

  • Confocal microscopy for high-resolution subcellular localization

  • Fluorescence microscopy at different scales to facilitate high-throughput screening

  • Time-lapse imaging to capture dynamic processes

  • Flow cytometry for quantitative analysis of population-wide expression

Applications for RPS8 studies:

  • Expression analysis:

    • Quantifying expression levels under different conditions

    • Monitoring responses to environmental stresses (temperature, light)

    • Tracking expression changes during cell cycle progression

  • Localization studies:

    • Confirming chloroplast targeting and incorporation into ribosomes

    • Visualizing ribosome distribution within chloroplasts

    • Detecting potential changes in localization under stress conditions

  • Protein-protein interactions:

    • Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to detect interactions with other ribosomal components

    • Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to visualize interactions in vivo

These approaches leverage the recently developed transformation protocols and fluorescent reporter systems specifically optimized for C. merolae , enabling sophisticated visualization and quantification of RPS8 dynamics.

What approaches can determine the impact of RPS8 variants on chloroplast translation under different environmental conditions?

Comprehensive analysis of how RPS8 variants affect chloroplast translation requires multifaceted approaches that integrate molecular, biochemical, and physiological measurements:

Translation efficiency analysis:

  • Polysome profiling:

    • Density gradient fractionation of cellular extracts

    • Analysis of ribosome subunits, monosomes, and polysomes

    • qRT-PCR of specific chloroplast transcripts across gradient fractions

  • Protein synthesis measurements:

    • In vivo labeling with radioisotopes (³⁵S-methionine)

    • Pulse-chase experiments to track protein synthesis and turnover

    • Quantitative proteomics comparing wild-type and RPS8 variant strains

Environmental condition testing matrix:

  • Temperature variations (15-50°C)

  • Light intensity gradients (10-500 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹)

  • Light/dark transitions

  • pH variations (1-5)

  • Nutrient limitations

Physiological and molecular readouts:

  • Growth rates and cell viability

  • Photosynthetic efficiency (oxygen evolution, fluorescence parameters)

  • Chlorophyll content measurements

  • Reactive oxygen species production

  • Stress response gene expression

Correlation analysis:

  • Link specific RPS8 mutations to translation phenotypes

  • Map phenotypic effects to environmental conditions

  • Connect translation defects to physiological outcomes

This systematic approach would enable precise determination of how specific RPS8 variants impact chloroplast translation across different environmental conditions, potentially revealing environment-specific adaptations mediated by this ribosomal protein.

How does the function of RPS8 in C. merolae compare with its role in cyanobacteria and higher plants?

Comparative analysis reveals both conserved and divergent aspects of RPS8 function across photosynthetic lineages:

Functional comparisons across evolutionary lineages:

OrganismRPS8 CharacteristicsFunctional AspectsGenetic Location
CyanobacteriaAncestral formCore component of 30S subunitBacterial genome
C. merolae (red alga)Primitive eukaryotic formEssential for ribosome assemblyChloroplast genome
Higher plants (e.g., rice)Modified through evolutionSubject to RNA editing (rps8-182) Chloroplast genome
E. coli (reference)Bacterial homologEssential for 30S assembly and cell survival Bacterial genome

Conserved features:

  • Core structural role in 30S ribosomal subunit assembly

  • Essential function in translation

  • Retention in chloroplast/plastid genome rather than transfer to nucleus

Divergent features:

  • RNA editing patterns (present in higher plants, not confirmed in C. merolae)

  • Environmental adaptation roles (cold tolerance in rice)

  • Sequence variations reflecting evolutionary adaptations

Evolutionary implications:

  • The retention of RPS8 in the chloroplast genome across diverse lineages suggests fundamental constraints preventing nuclear transfer

  • The emergence of RNA editing in higher plants may represent an adaptation to environmental challenges

  • C. merolae's RPS8 likely represents an intermediate evolutionary form between cyanobacterial ancestors and higher plant versions

This comparative perspective provides valuable insights into both the fundamental conservation of ribosomal function and the evolutionary adaptations specific to different photosynthetic lineages.

What lessons from bacterial RPS8 studies can be applied to C. merolae research?

Extensive research on bacterial RPS8, particularly in E. coli, provides valuable insights applicable to C. merolae studies:

Key findings from bacterial RPS8 research:

  • RPS8 plays a critical role in 30S ribosomal subunit assembly

  • It is essential for cell survival in E. coli

  • Functions in a network of interactions with other ribosomal proteins and rRNA

  • Serves as a primary binding protein during ribosome assembly

Methodological approaches transferable to C. merolae:

  • Structural analysis techniques:

    • Cryo-electron microscopy for ribosome structure determination

    • Chemical probing methods for RNA-protein interaction mapping

    • Crosslinking strategies to identify binding partners

  • Functional assays:

    • In vitro reconstitution of ribosomes with purified components

    • Translation efficiency measurements

    • Binding affinity determinations for RNA and protein partners

  • Mutagenesis strategies:

    • Identification of critical functional residues

    • Structure-function correlation studies

    • Complementation assays with bacterial variants

Experimental adaptations required:

  • Modifications to account for the extremophilic nature of C. merolae (pH 0.2-4, 40-56°C)

  • Considerations for chloroplast-specific factors not present in bacteria

  • Adjustments for eukaryotic cellular compartmentalization

By leveraging the extensive knowledge base from bacterial studies while accounting for the unique aspects of C. merolae biology, researchers can accelerate progress in understanding chloroplastic RPS8 function and developing biotechnological applications.

How can insights from RPS8 in rice cold tolerance inform C. merolae research and biotechnological applications?

Research showing that RPS8 contributes to cold tolerance in rice offers valuable insights for C. merolae research and biotechnology:

Key findings from rice studies:

  • RNA editing of rps8-182 generates a serine-to-leucine amino acid change in RPS8

  • This non-conservative change (polar to non-polar) appears critical for proper function

  • Rice accessions lacking this editing show cold-sensitivity (albino phenotype at 20°C)

  • Expression of the edited RPS8 isoform restores chlorophyll production under cold conditions

Translation to C. merolae research:

  • Comparative sequence analysis:

    • Identification of analogous residues in C. merolae RPS8

    • Assessment of evolutionary conservation of the key residue (Ser/Leu position)

    • Screening for potential RNA editing sites in C. merolae rps8

  • Engineering approaches:

    • Generation of C. merolae strains expressing RPS8 variants with targeted modifications

    • Creation of chimeric RPS8 proteins incorporating functional domains from cold-tolerant species

    • Testing of these variants for ribosome function and cold tolerance

Biotechnological applications:

  • Development of C. merolae strains with expanded temperature range for cultivation

  • Engineering strains for improved protein expression at lower temperatures

  • Creation of bioreactors operational in non-tropical climates

  • Application of insights to other algal species used in biotechnology

Experimental design framework:

  • Generate C. merolae strains expressing:

    • Wild-type RPS8 (control)

    • RPS8 with site-directed mutations mimicking rice edited form

    • RPS8 with additional modifications based on computational predictions

  • Test performance parameters:

    • Growth rates at various temperatures (15-45°C)

    • Photosynthetic efficiency measurements

    • Chloroplast translation capacity

    • Production of target compounds (e.g., isoprene as demonstrated in C. merolae)

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.