Recombinant Danio rerio Acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5A (acbd5a) refers to a genetically engineered version of the Acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5A from the zebrafish (Danio rerio). This protein is part of the ACBD family, which plays crucial roles in lipid metabolism and organelle interactions within cells. The ACBD proteins, including ACBD5, are involved in forming lipid hubs that facilitate lipid metabolism at organelle interfaces, such as peroxisomes .
ACBD proteins contain an ACB domain, a conserved structure found across eukaryotes. This domain is essential for binding acyl-CoA, a key molecule in lipid metabolism. The ACB domain's structure allows it to bind the 3′-phosphate-AMP moiety of acyl-CoA in one pocket and the acyl chain in another, facilitating the buffering and transport of acyl-CoA within cells .
| Protein | Function | Location |
|---|---|---|
| ACBD2 | Peroxisome-organelle tether | Peroxisomes |
| ACBD4 | Peroxisome-organelle tether | Peroxisomes |
| ACBD5 | Peroxisome-organelle tether | Peroxisomes |
| ACBD3 | Golgi-ER contact sites | Golgi apparatus |
| Application | Description |
|---|---|
| Lipid Metabolism | Understanding lipid metabolism pathways |
| Disease Modeling | Studying lipid-related diseases using zebrafish models |
| Drug Development | Identifying targets for lipid metabolism disorders |
Research on ACBD proteins, including ACBD5, can provide insights into lipid metabolism and organelle interactions. This knowledge can be applied to understanding diseases related to lipid metabolism and developing therapeutic strategies. Zebrafish models are particularly useful due to their genetic similarity to humans and their rapid development cycle, which facilitates drug testing and disease modeling .
Acyl-CoA binding protein functioning as the peroxisome receptor for pexophagy, although dispensable for aggrephagy and non-selective autophagy. It binds medium- and long-chain acyl-CoA esters.
Acyl-CoA-binding domain-containing protein 5A (acbd5a) is a peroxisomal protein in zebrafish that contains an acyl-CoA binding domain (ACBD) at its N-terminal region. It is a tail-anchored membrane protein that exposes its ACBD to the cytosol. This protein plays a crucial role in lipid metabolism, particularly in the β-oxidation of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) in peroxisomes. Zebrafish acbd5a is structurally and functionally similar to human ACBD5, making it valuable for studying human diseases related to peroxisomal dysfunction .
Zebrafish acbd5a shares significant sequence homology with human ACBD5, reflecting the evolutionary conservation of this protein. The zebrafish ortholog contains the characteristic N-terminal acyl-CoA binding domain that is critical for its function. Given that zebrafish share approximately 70% of their genes with humans and more specifically 84% of the genes associated with human genetic diseases, acbd5a likely retains key functional domains present in the human version . Both proteins are peroxisomal tail-anchored membrane proteins with similar topological organization, suggesting conserved mechanisms of action across species.
Zebrafish provide numerous advantages as a model organism for studying acbd5a:
Rapid development - Most major organs form within 24 hours, allowing for efficient experimental timelines
Transparent embryos - Enabling direct visualization of developmental processes and protein localization
External fertilization - Facilitating genetic manipulation and experimental interventions
High fecundity - Each female can produce up to 300 embryos every 2-3 days, providing sufficient samples for statistical power
Genetic similarity to humans - Zebrafish possess orthologs of many human disease-causing genes, including those involved in peroxisomal disorders
Amenability to drug administration - Novel methods allow for precise dosing of compounds in zebrafish studies
These characteristics make zebrafish an excellent model for investigating the physiological roles of acbd5a and its implications in human disease states.
Several methodologies can be employed to detect acbd5a expression in zebrafish tissues:
RT-qPCR: For quantitative analysis of acbd5a mRNA expression levels in different tissues or developmental stages. This technique requires designing specific primers for the zebrafish acbd5a gene.
In situ hybridization: For spatial mapping of acbd5a expression patterns during development and in adult tissues. This technique allows visualization of the specific cells expressing the gene.
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: Using specific antibodies against zebrafish acbd5a to detect protein localization in tissue sections. If antibodies against zebrafish acbd5a are not commercially available, recombinant acbd5a with epitope tags can be used to generate such antibodies.
Western blotting: For quantitative analysis of acbd5a protein levels in tissue lysates. This technique can also reveal potential post-translational modifications.
Transgenic reporter lines: Creating zebrafish lines expressing fluorescent proteins under the control of the acbd5a promoter to monitor gene expression in real-time, taking advantage of the transparency of zebrafish embryos .
The regulation of acbd5a expression during zebrafish development involves:
Temporal regulation: Expression patterns likely change throughout development, with specific peaks during organogenesis of tissues where peroxisomal metabolism is critical.
Spatial regulation: Expression is likely highest in tissues with significant peroxisomal content, including liver, kidneys, and potentially the retina, given the association of human ACBD5 mutations with retinal dystrophy .
Transcriptional regulation: The acbd5a promoter likely contains binding sites for transcription factors involved in peroxisomal biogenesis and lipid metabolism.
Post-transcriptional regulation: mRNA stability and translation efficiency may be regulated by RNA-binding proteins and microRNAs specific to metabolic pathways.
Characterizing these regulatory mechanisms requires techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), reporter assays, and RNA stability measurements in zebrafish embryos and tissues.
Multiple expression systems can be employed for recombinant zebrafish acbd5a production, each with specific advantages:
E. coli-based expression:
Advantages: High yield, cost-effective, rapid production
Considerations: May require optimization of codon usage for zebrafish genes; the peroxisomal membrane-associated nature of acbd5a may cause inclusion body formation
Recommendation: Express only the soluble N-terminal ACBD domain for functional studies, as the full-length protein contains a transmembrane domain that may complicate purification
Insect cell expression (Baculovirus system):
Advantages: Post-translational modifications closer to vertebrates, better folding of complex proteins
Considerations: Higher cost, longer production time
Recommendation: Preferable for full-length acbd5a expression with native folding
Mammalian cell expression:
Advantages: Most authentic post-translational modifications, proper folding
Considerations: Highest cost, lower yield
Recommendation: Best for studies requiring physiologically relevant modifications
Cell-free expression systems:
Advantages: Rapid production, direct incorporation of modified amino acids
Considerations: Lower yield, higher cost
Recommendation: Useful for preliminary functional studies or when rapid results are needed
The choice should be guided by the specific research questions and downstream applications. When precise binding studies with very-long-chain fatty acyl-CoAs (VLC-CoAs) are required, a system that ensures proper folding of the ACBD domain is essential .
Effective purification strategies for recombinant zebrafish acbd5a include:
Affinity chromatography:
His-tag purification: 6-8 histidine residues at N- or C-terminus
GST-fusion: Improves solubility but adds large tag
MBP-fusion: Enhances solubility for the full-length protein
Ion exchange chromatography:
Useful as a secondary purification step
Selection of cation or anion exchange depends on the isoelectric point of acbd5a
Size exclusion chromatography:
Final polishing step to remove aggregates and ensure monodispersity
Critical for structural studies and accurate binding assays
Lyse cells in buffer containing mild detergents (for full-length protein)
Perform initial purification via affinity chromatography
Remove tags using specific proteases if necessary
Further purify using ion exchange chromatography
Perform final purification via size exclusion chromatography
Verify purity by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Confirm identity using mass spectrometry
For the N-terminal ACBD domain alone (without the transmembrane region), standard protein purification protocols can be followed with higher expected yields and simpler procedures.
Several methodologies can be employed to measure binding affinities:
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):
Directly measures thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG) and binding constants (Kd)
Requires purified protein and ligands
Typical protocol: Titrate various concentrations of very-long-chain fatty acyl-CoAs into a solution of purified recombinant acbd5a while measuring heat changes
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):
Measures real-time binding kinetics (kon, koff)
Requires immobilization of either protein or ligand
Typical protocol: Immobilize recombinant acbd5a on a sensor chip and flow various acyl-CoA species at different concentrations
Fluorescence-based assays:
Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence quenching
Environmentally sensitive fluorescent probes
FRET-based approaches
Typical protocol: Monitor changes in fluorescence intensity as increasing concentrations of acyl-CoAs are added to a solution of recombinant acbd5a
Ligand displacement assays:
Competitive binding assays using fluorescently labeled acyl-CoA probes
Typical protocol: Establish binding of a fluorescent acyl-CoA analog, then compete with unlabeled acyl-CoAs of various chain lengths
Based on research with human ACBD5, zebrafish acbd5a is expected to preferentially bind very-long-chain fatty acyl-CoAs (VLC-CoAs) . Create a comparative binding profile using acyl-CoAs of various chain lengths (C16 to C26) to determine the specificity of zebrafish acbd5a.
To assess the impact of acbd5a on peroxisomal β-oxidation in zebrafish:
VLCFA analysis by GC-MS or LC-MS/MS:
Quantify C22:0-C26:0 fatty acid levels in tissues from wild-type versus acbd5a-deficient zebrafish
Protocol: Extract total lipids from tissues, derive fatty acids, and analyze by mass spectrometry
Expected result: acbd5a-deficient fish would show elevated VLCFA levels if the protein functions similarly to human ACBD5
Radioactive substrate-based β-oxidation assays:
Measure oxidation rates of [1-14C]-labeled VLCFAs in isolated peroxisomes or tissue homogenates
Protocol: Incubate samples with labeled substrates and measure radioactive CO2 production
Expected result: Reduced oxidation rates in acbd5a-deficient samples
Phospholipid profiling:
Peroxisome morphology and abundance assessment:
Zebrafish-specific behavioral tests:
Assess swimming patterns and responses to stimuli that might be affected by altered lipid metabolism
Protocol: Utilize standardized behavioral tests such as the light/dark preference test
Expected result: Potential behavioral abnormalities in acbd5a-deficient fish, particularly if VLCFA accumulation affects neural function
Zebrafish acbd5a models can provide valuable insights into retinal dystrophy mechanisms through:
Generation of mutant lines:
Create acbd5a knockout or knockdown zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9 or morpholinos
Introduce specific human patient mutations to recapitulate disease phenotypes
Retinal phenotype characterization:
Histological analysis of retinal layers and cell types
Immunohistochemistry for photoreceptor markers
Electron microscopy to examine subcellular structures, particularly photoreceptor outer segments
Functional assessment using electroretinography (ERG)
Mechanistic investigations:
Analysis of lipid composition in retinal tissues
Assessment of peroxisomal function in retinal cells
Evaluation of photoreceptor-specific gene expression
Intervention studies:
Human ACBD5 mutations have been associated with syndromic retinal dystrophy , making zebrafish models particularly valuable for understanding pathogenic mechanisms. The transparency of zebrafish embryos allows for real-time visualization of retinal development and degeneration processes , providing unique advantages for studying the progression of retinal pathology.
Based on knowledge of human ACBD5 and peroxisomal disorders, acbd5a-deficient zebrafish would likely exhibit:
Biochemical alterations:
Tissue-specific manifestations:
Developmental effects:
Possible delays in specific developmental processes
Potentially normal gross morphology but with subtle organ-specific defects
Behavioral phenotypes:
Stress response:
Potentially enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress
Possible altered response to lipid-modulating compounds
These phenotypes would likely be more subtle than those observed in zebrafish models of severe peroxisomal biogenesis disorders, as acbd5a deficiency affects specific aspects of peroxisomal function rather than global peroxisome formation .
Optimal CRISPR/Cas9 strategies for acbd5a modification in zebrafish include:
Target selection:
Target early exons to ensure complete loss-of-function
Focus on the ACBD domain-encoding region for functional studies
Design multiple gRNAs to increase targeting efficiency
Avoid regions with potential off-target sites in the zebrafish genome
Delivery methods:
Microinjection of Cas9 protein:gRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes into one-cell stage embryos
Co-injection with a donor template for precise mutations or insertions
Potential use of tissue-specific Cas9 expression for conditional knockout
Verification strategies:
T7 endonuclease assay for initial screening
Direct sequencing of targeted regions
Western blotting to confirm protein loss
RT-qPCR to assess mRNA levels and potential compensatory mechanisms
Specific applications:
Complete knockout: Target coding sequences to create frameshift mutations
Domain-specific studies: Create in-frame deletions of specific functional domains
Patient mutations: Introduce specific point mutations using homology-directed repair
Reporter tagging: Insert fluorescent protein sequences in-frame with acbd5a
Addressing potential limitations:
Screen for genetic compensation by related genes (potentially acbd5b if it exists in zebrafish)
Generate multiple independent lines to control for off-target effects
Consider generating tissue-specific conditional knockouts if complete knockout is lethal
To identify in vivo interaction partners of zebrafish acbd5a:
Proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID or TurboID):
Generate transgenic zebrafish expressing acbd5a fused to a biotin ligase
Harvest tissues at different developmental stages
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
Advantages: Captures transient interactions and works in native cellular environment
Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry:
Express tagged versions of acbd5a in zebrafish
Perform immunoprecipitation from tissue lysates
Identify co-precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
Advantages: Direct evidence for physical interactions
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use zebrafish acbd5a as bait against a zebrafish cDNA library
Verify positive interactions in zebrafish cells
Advantages: Systematic screening approach
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) in vivo:
Generate transgenic zebrafish expressing acbd5a fused to a fluorescent protein
Co-express candidate interactors with complementary fluorescent tags
Analyze interaction by FRET microscopy in live embryos
Advantages: Direct visualization of interactions in real-time in living organisms
Split-GFP complementation:
Express acbd5a and candidate partners fused to complementary GFP fragments
Visualize interactions through reconstituted GFP fluorescence
Advantages: Direct visualization with potentially less interference than full fluorescent proteins
Based on human ACBD5 studies, potential interaction partners to investigate include peroxisomal membrane proteins, components of the fatty acid transport machinery, and proteins involved in phospholipid metabolism .
Recombinant acbd5a solubility and stability challenges can be addressed through:
Expression strategy optimization:
Express only the soluble N-terminal ACBD domain without the transmembrane region
Use solubility-enhancing fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, or TrxA)
Lower induction temperature (16-18°C) for slower expression and better folding
Reduce inducer concentration to slow expression rate
Buffer optimization:
Screen different pH ranges (typically 7.0-8.0)
Test various salt concentrations (150-500 mM NaCl)
Include stabilizing agents: glycerol (5-10%), mild detergents (for full-length protein)
Add reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to prevent disulfide-mediated aggregation
Storage conditions:
Determine optimal protein concentration (typically 1-5 mg/ml)
Test stability at different temperatures (4°C, -20°C, -80°C)
Evaluate freeze-thaw stability and consider flash-freezing aliquots
Test lyophilization with appropriate protectants
Stability assessment methods:
Differential scanning fluorimetry to identify stabilizing conditions
Size exclusion chromatography to monitor aggregation state
Dynamic light scattering to assess homogeneity
Activity assays to confirm functional integrity over time
For full-length acbd5a containing the transmembrane domain, consider using mild detergents such as CHAPS, DDM, or Triton X-100 at concentrations just above their critical micelle concentration to maintain the native structure without causing aggregation.
To address inconsistent phenotypes in acbd5a-modified zebrafish:
Genetic background considerations:
Maintain consistent genetic background across experiments
Backcross mutant lines to wild-type for multiple generations
Use siblings as controls whenever possible
Consider generating mutations on multiple background strains to assess robustness
Molecular verification:
Thoroughly verify mutations at DNA, RNA, and protein levels
Check for potential genetic compensation by related genes
Assess potential alternative splicing around the mutation site
Quantify residual protein levels using sensitive detection methods
Experimental standardization:
Phenotyping strategies:
Data analysis approaches:
Use appropriate statistical methods for the data type
Account for potential covariates
Consider employing multiple analytical approaches
Report effect sizes along with p-values
When using behavioral assays such as the light/dark preference test, maintain consistent environmental conditions and use standardized protocols as described in the research methodology literature to ensure replicability across experiments .
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | ~55-60 kDa | Full-length protein |
| Isoelectric Point | ~9.0 | Predicted based on amino acid composition |
| Domains | ACBD (N-terminal), Transmembrane (C-terminal) | Similar to human ACBD5 structure |
| Subcellular Localization | Peroxisomal membrane | Tail-anchored topology |
| Stability (purified protein) | Moderate | Requires optimization for long-term storage |
| Expression Level in Zebrafish | Highest in liver, retina, brain | Based on expected pattern similar to mammals |
| Research Application | Recommended Expression System | Expected Yield | Purification Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binding Studies (ACBD domain only) | E. coli | High | Low-Moderate |
| Structural Studies | Insect Cells | Moderate | Moderate |
| Full-length Functional Studies | Mammalian Cells | Low-Moderate | High |
| Antibody Production | E. coli (ACBD domain) | High | Moderate |
| Interaction Studies | Depends on partners | Variable | Variable |
| Manipulation | Expected Biochemical Effects | Expected Physiological Effects | Potential Behavioral Effects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Knockout | ↑ VLCFAs, ↑ VLCFA-phospholipids, ↓ β-oxidation | Retinal abnormalities, Possible liver phenotype | Vision-dependent behavioral changes |
| ACBD Domain Mutation | Similar to knockout but potentially milder | Similar to knockout but potentially milder | Similar to knockout but potentially milder |
| Overexpression | ↓ VLCFAs, ↑ β-oxidation | Minimal or subtle effects | Likely minimal |
| Patient-specific Mutations | Variable depending on mutation | Potentially retinal dystrophy phenotypes | Possible light sensitivity changes |