Recombinant Danio rerio Fez family zinc finger protein 2 (FEZF2) is a recombinant protein derived from zebrafish (Danio rerio). It is part of the FEZ family of zinc finger proteins, which are transcription factors involved in various developmental and regulatory processes in the nervous system. The FEZF2 protein, specifically, plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of neurons, including those in the cerebral cortex and retina.
The recombinant FEZF2 protein from zebrafish is typically produced with a His tag for purification purposes. It spans amino acids 1-430 and is often expressed in yeast, though other expression systems like E. coli, mammalian cells, or baculovirus infection can also be used . The protein has a purity of over 90% and is commonly used in applications such as ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay).
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Origin | Zebrafish (Danio rerio) |
| Expression System | Yeast (common), E. coli, mammalian cells, or baculovirus |
| Purification Tag | His tag |
| Amino Acid Span | 1-430 |
| Purity | > 90% |
| Application | ELISA |
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Transcription Regulation | Regulates gene expression in neurons |
| Neurodevelopment | Essential for the development of corticospinal motor neurons |
| Neurotransmitter Identity | Influences neurotransmitter selection in neurons |
Research on FEZF2 has primarily focused on its role in mammals, particularly in mice. Studies have shown that FEZF2 is involved in maintaining the molecular profiles of mature neurons and regulating ion flux and cell signaling . In zebrafish, while specific studies on recombinant FEZF2 are scarce, its use in research could provide insights into neural development and transcriptional regulation in a model organism.
| Application | Description |
|---|---|
| Neurological Studies | Investigating neural development and maintenance |
| Transcriptional Regulation | Understanding gene expression control in neurons |
| Model Organism Research | Utilizing zebrafish for studying neural development |
STRING: 7955.ENSDARP00000094772
UniGene: Dr.82591
Fezf2 (Forebrain embryonic zinc finger 2) is a zinc-finger transcription factor crucial for proper neural development. While most extensively studied in mammals, Fezf2 in zebrafish shows conserved functions in forebrain development and neuronal specification. Similar to its mammalian counterpart, zebrafish Fezf2 regulates the expression of downstream genes involved in neural patterning, cell fate determination, and circuit formation .
Zebrafish Fezf2 expression begins during early gastrulation (similar to what has been observed in Xenopus at stage 10.5) and reaches peak expression during neurulation . Its expression is primarily localized to the anterior neural region and presumptive forebrain, consistent with its role in forebrain development. Importantly, Fezf2 continues to be expressed into adulthood, suggesting ongoing functions in mature neural tissues beyond initial developmental roles .
Fezf2 expression is dynamically regulated throughout zebrafish development, with both spatial and temporal specificity. Research indicates that neuronal activity plays a crucial role in regulating Fezf2 expression. Studies in mice have shown that manipulating neuronal activity through either Kir2.1 expression (to reduce activity) or chemogenetic approaches using DREADDs (to increase activity) directly impacts Fezf2 expression levels .
In zebrafish, as in other vertebrates, Fezf2 expression begins during early gastrulation, peaks during neurulation, and then maintains a steady state throughout later development . This temporal regulation likely involves both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has been implicated in the regulation of Fezf2 expression, as overexpression of Fezf2 has been demonstrated to activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling in early embryos .
Multiple complementary approaches have proven effective for investigating Fezf2 function in zebrafish:
| Approach | Application | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morpholino knockdown | Early developmental functions | Rapid results, targeted | Potential off-target effects, limited to early stages |
| CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing | Generation of stable mutant lines | Permanent modification, heritable | More time-consuming, requires genotyping |
| Conditional expression systems | Temporal control of Fezf2 expression | Precise timing of manipulation | Requires specialized transgenic lines |
| Single-molecule FISH | Expression pattern analysis | Single-cell resolution | Technical complexity, limited to fixed samples |
| RNA-sequencing | Transcriptome-wide effects | Comprehensive analysis | Requires careful control and validation |
| Chemogenetic approaches | Activity-dependent regulation | Cell-type specificity | Requires delivery of DREADDs and ligands |
For expression analysis, single-molecule RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization has been particularly informative in mammals and can be adapted for zebrafish to visualize Fezf2 expression at cellular resolution . For functional studies, both transient knockdown approaches (morpholinos) and stable genetic modifications (CRISPR-Cas9) have been successfully employed in zebrafish to study transcription factor function.
While specific downstream targets in zebrafish are still being fully characterized, studies in mammals have identified several key targets that are likely conserved in zebrafish:
RNA-sequencing analysis in mice with Fezf2 knockdown has revealed 756 genes with significantly altered expression, with 65% of these genes being direct targets of FEZF2 as confirmed by Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing . These include genes involved in neuronal signaling, calcium signaling pathways, and cell adhesion molecules.
Designing effective shRNA knockdown for zebrafish Fezf2 requires careful consideration of several factors:
Target sequence selection: Design shRNAs targeting conserved regions of zebrafish Fezf2 mRNA. Perform BLAST analysis to ensure 100% homology to zebrafish Fezf2 with minimal homology to other transcripts. Any sequence with ≥16 nucleotide match (84%) to off-target sequences should be discarded .
Control design: Include both a non-silencing shRNA control and a positive control targeting a gene with known knockdown phenotype. In published Fezf2 studies, shRNA against beta-galactosidase (LacZ) has been used as a control since it does not target mammalian genes .
Validation strategy: Develop a multi-tiered validation approach:
Quantify Fezf2 mRNA levels using qPCR (aim for >70% reduction)
Assess protein reduction via immunohistochemistry or Western blot
Confirm functional consequences by examining known downstream targets
Delivery system: For zebrafish embryos, microinjection of shRNA expression constructs is effective. For juvenile or adult studies, consider viral vectors with appropriate promoters for targeted expression. Studies in mammals have successfully used lentiviral delivery systems for Fezf2 knockdown in mature tissue .
Temporal considerations: If studying developmental roles, deliver shRNA before gastrulation. For mature functions, use inducible systems (e.g., Tet-On/Off) or CreERT2-mediated recombination with tamoxifen administration at desired timepoints .
Distinguishing between developmental and adult functions of Fezf2 requires temporal control of gene manipulation. Several approaches can accomplish this:
Inducible knockdown/knockout systems: The use of CreERT2 systems allows for temporal control of gene manipulation through tamoxifen administration. This approach has been successfully employed in mice by injecting retrograde AAV encoding inducible Cre (CreERT2) along with Fezf2 shRNA, followed by induction at P21 to study adult functions independently of developmental roles .
Temporal expression analysis: RNA-seq analysis at different developmental stages and in adult tissues can identify shifts in Fezf2-regulated gene networks. Comparative transcriptome analysis between developmental and adult tissues with Fezf2 manipulation can reveal stage-specific targets .
Rescue experiments: After early knockdown of Fezf2, reintroduction at specific later timepoints can help determine which phenotypes are reversible (likely maintained functions) versus irreversible (developmental functions).
Cell-type specific approaches: Using cell-type specific promoters to drive Cre expression allows for manipulation of Fezf2 in specific neuronal populations at defined developmental stages.
Activity-dependent manipulation: Since Fezf2 expression is activity-regulated in mature neurons, manipulating neuronal activity (e.g., through optogenetics or chemogenetics) specifically in adult animals can reveal activity-dependent functions of Fezf2 that are distinct from its developmental roles .
Investigation of Fezf2's role in activity-dependent inhibitory synapse formation requires sophisticated approaches that manipulate both neuronal activity and Fezf2 expression:
Activity manipulation paired with Fezf2 measurement:
Inhibitory synapse quantification:
Immunostaining for inhibitory synapse markers (gephyrin, VGAT, specific GABA-A receptor subunits)
Electrophysiological recording of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs)
Live imaging of fluorescently tagged inhibitory synapse markers in transparent zebrafish larvae
Molecular mechanism investigation:
Temporal manipulation:
Early knockdown of Fezf2 during the period of inhibitory synapse formation
Late knockdown after inhibitory synapses have formed to test maintenance role
Manipulation during defined critical periods of inhibitory circuit refinement
Research in mice has demonstrated that downregulation of Fezf2 in layer 5 ET cells reduced perisomatic PV+ inhibitory inputs, indicating Fezf2's crucial role in regulating inhibitory synapse formation in an activity-dependent manner .
Identifying direct transcriptional targets of Fezf2 requires approaches that can distinguish direct binding and regulation from indirect effects:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq):
Requires a highly specific antibody against zebrafish Fezf2 or epitope-tagged recombinant Fezf2
Optimized fixation and sonication protocols for zebrafish tissues
Bioinformatic analysis to identify binding motifs and genomic regions
CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag:
More sensitive alternatives to ChIP-seq requiring fewer cells
Particularly useful for tissue-specific analysis in zebrafish
Provides high-resolution binding data with lower background
ATAC-seq combined with Fezf2 manipulation:
Identify regions of open chromatin that change in accessibility following Fezf2 knockdown
Correlate with expression changes to identify potential direct targets
Integration of multiple datasets:
Validation of individual targets:
Reporter assays with wild-type and mutated binding sites
CRISPR interference at Fezf2 binding sites to test functional relevance
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays to confirm direct binding
Contradictory findings about Fezf2 function may arise from differences in experimental systems, developmental stages, or cell types. A systematic approach to reconciling such contradictions includes:
Comprehensive experimental comparison:
| Source of Variation | Analysis Approach | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Species differences | Direct comparison of zebrafish vs. mouse Fezf2 function using identical methods | Identification of conserved vs. species-specific functions |
| Developmental timing | Stage-specific manipulations with precise temporal control | Resolution of apparently contradictory roles at different stages |
| Cell-type specificity | Single-cell transcriptomics after Fezf2 manipulation | Cell-type specific Fezf2 functions and targets |
| Dosage effects | Titrated knockdown/overexpression | Threshold-dependent vs. graded responses |
| Genetic background | Experiments across different strains/genetic backgrounds | Modifier genes that influence Fezf2 function |
Molecular context investigation: Examine the expression of Fezf2 cofactors and interacting proteins across experimental systems. Differences in the availability of cofactors may explain functional variations.
Technical considerations: Evaluate methodological differences including:
Knockdown efficiency (shRNA vs morpholino vs CRISPR)
Expression analysis techniques (bulk RNA-seq vs. single-cell RNA-seq)
Phenotypic analysis approaches (timing, resolution, quantification methods)
Functional domain analysis: Different experimental approaches may preferentially affect specific functional domains of Fezf2. Structure-function analysis using domain-specific mutations can resolve such contradictions.
Integration of in vitro and in vivo findings: Establish simplified in vitro systems to dissect molecular mechanisms, then validate in vivo to maintain physiological relevance.
While Fezf2 is primarily studied in neural contexts, emerging research has identified important non-neuronal functions that can be investigated in zebrafish:
Recent studies have identified Fezf2 as a regulator of thymic epithelial cell development, particularly in the formation of Tuft-mTECs (medullary thymic epithelial cells) . This suggests broader roles for Fezf2 in epithelial development and immune system function.
To study non-neuronal functions of Fezf2 in zebrafish:
Tissue-specific expression analysis:
Whole-mount in situ hybridization at different developmental stages
Single-cell RNA-seq of non-neural tissues to identify Fezf2-expressing populations
Reporter transgenic lines (fezf2:GFP) to visualize expression patterns
Tissue-specific manipulation:
Use of tissue-specific promoters to drive Cre expression for conditional manipulation
Electroporation of specific tissues for targeted delivery of shRNA
Cell transplantation experiments to create chimeric animals
Immune system analysis:
Flow cytometry of thymic populations in Fezf2 mutant zebrafish
Functional immunological assays including pathogen challenge
Thymic organoid culture from zebrafish cells with Fezf2 manipulation
Cross-species comparisons:
Compare non-neuronal Fezf2 expression and function between zebrafish and mammals
Identify conserved signaling pathways across species
The study of non-neuronal Fezf2 functions represents an emerging area that may reveal new insights into the versatility of this transcription factor beyond its established roles in neural development.
Establishing a comprehensive experimental system requires integration of multiple approaches:
Temporal-spatial expression mapping:
Generate transgenic fezf2:GFP reporter lines for live imaging
Perform time-course in situ hybridization focusing on critical developmental periods
Use photoconvertible reporters to track Fezf2-expressing cells over time
Genetic manipulation tools:
CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts (complete or conditional)
Inducible expression systems (heat-shock or drug-inducible)
Cell-type specific manipulation using Gal4/UAS system
Transcriptome analysis pipeline:
Bulk RNA-seq of dissected brain regions
Single-cell RNA-seq to identify cell-type specific effects
Ribosome profiling to assess translational regulation
Temporal analysis at key developmental stages
Network modeling:
Integration of expression data with ChIP-seq results
Computational prediction of transcription factor binding sites
Pathway analysis to identify enriched biological processes
Comparison with mammalian Fezf2 networks to identify conserved modules
Validation system:
Reporter assays for direct target validation
CRISPR interference to test functional relevance of binding sites
Rescue experiments with wild-type and mutant Fezf2
Studies in mice have established that Fezf2 regulates hundreds of genes with enrichment for pathways including neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, cell adhesion molecules, and calcium signaling . Similar analyses in zebrafish would provide valuable comparative data on conserved transcriptional networks.
Cross-species comparisons of Fezf2 function require careful methodological considerations:
Sequence homology analysis:
Perform phylogenetic analysis of Fezf2 across species
Compare DNA-binding domains and protein interaction domains
Identify species-specific protein modifications or splicing variants
Expression pattern comparison:
Use standardized staging criteria across species
Compare expression in homologous structures rather than anatomical equivalents
Consider differences in developmental timing and heterochrony
Functional equivalence testing:
Cross-species rescue experiments (e.g., can zebrafish Fezf2 rescue mouse knockout?)
Domain-swapping experiments to identify functional conservation
Compare binding motifs and DNA recognition properties
Target gene conservation:
Compare ChIP-seq data across species
Identify conserved vs. species-specific targets
Analyze conservation of Fezf2 binding sites in orthologous genes
Standardized phenotypic analysis:
Develop comparable phenotypic assays across species
Focus on conserved developmental processes
Consider species-specific compensatory mechanisms
Cross-species comparisons between zebrafish and mammals can provide unique insights into both conserved and divergent functions of Fezf2, potentially revealing fundamental principles of transcriptional regulation in vertebrate development.
Fezf2 research continues to evolve, with several emerging areas showing particular promise:
Activity-dependent plasticity: The finding that Fezf2 expression is activity-regulated in mammals suggests it may serve as a link between neuronal activity and transcriptional regulation in mature circuits . This opens new avenues for studying activity-dependent plasticity in zebrafish.
Non-neuronal functions: The discovery of Fezf2's role in thymic epithelial cell development suggests broader functions that remain to be explored in zebrafish .
Disease modeling: Given Fezf2's role in regulating genes associated with specific behavioral phenotypes (including associative learning, social interaction, and hyperactivity) , zebrafish models with Fezf2 manipulation may provide insights into neurodevelopmental disorders.
Translational applications: Understanding the mechanisms by which Fezf2 regulates neuronal differentiation and maintenance may inform strategies for neuronal reprogramming and regeneration, areas where zebrafish research has particular advantages.